ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    April
    12,
    1990
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    PETITION OF GRANITE CITY DIVISION
    OF NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION
    FOR ADJUSTED STANDARDS FROM
    )
    AS 90-4
    35
    ILL. •ADM. CODE 302.102, 302.208,
    )
    (Adjusted Standard)
    302.210, AND SUBPART
    F,
    PROCEDURES
    FOR DETERMINING WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by R.
    C.
    Flemal):
    This matter
    comes before the Board upon
    a motion
    to dismiss
    Petitioner’s adjusted standard petition filed March
    26,
    1990 by
    the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (“Agency”).
    On
    April
    3,
    1990,
    Petitioner
    filed
    its reply requesting
    that the
    Agency’s motion be denied.
    On March
    5,
    1990 Petitioner
    filed a petition
    for adjusted
    standard with the Board
    for relief from Board regulations
    governing mixing zones; numeric standards
    for cyanide, copper and
    fluoride;
    and narrative standards and whole effluent toxicity
    standards,
    as those rules were amended by the Board in the Toxics
    Control Regulatory Proceeding,
    R88—21(A)
    (January 25,
    1990,
    effective February
    13,
    1990).
    In its motion,
    the Agency requests the Board dismiss this
    petition
    “until the Petitioner provides all the informational
    requirements contained
    in
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code 106.705.”
    In support
    of
    its motion,
    the Agency discusses several areas
    in which
    it
    believes the petition contains insufficient
    information.
    Petitioner challenges the Agency’s contentions,
    stating that
    its petition meets all regulatory requirements.
    Petitioner
    submits
    that even should the Board believe that more information
    is required, Petitioner requests that the Board issue an order
    seeking more
    information rather than dismissal, consistent with
    Section 106.705.
    Petitioner further submits that the Agency’s
    challenge
    1o
    this petition
    is
    in contrast with the Agency’s
    position
    In R88—2l(IB), where the Agency encouraged the Board to
    resolve Petitioner’s requested relief through
    the Adjusted
    Standard process.
    Moreover,
    Petitioner states its willingness
    to
    discuss with the Agency technical disagreements regarding
    the
    type and amount of information submitted (Response at par.
    4).
    Upon review of the alleged deficiencies and response by
    Petitioner,
    the Board finds that the Agency’s concerns mainly
    involve matters which are best resolved during the course
    of this
    proceeding.
    The Board notes that several petitions
    for variance,
    110—99

    —2—
    as well as petitions
    for adjusted standards,
    have been filed
    seeking relief from the R88—2lA water toxics rules.
    (PCB 90—27,
    PCB 90—28,
    PCB 90—29,
    PCB 90—30,
    AS 90—2,
    AS 90—3,
    AS 90—5.)
    The
    Agency has requested dismissal due to asserted informational
    deficiencies
    in each case,
    save for AS
    90—5.
    Given the nature of
    the water toxics amendments and the fact that there
    is
    no
    previously established benchmark
    for judging the sufficiency of a
    petition in this arena,
    the Board
    is not prepared at this time
    to
    dismiss this petition as deficient.
    However, since Petitioner
    bears the burden of proof,
    it
    is obvious
    that
    to the extent
    additional
    information
    is
    necessary for such proof, such
    information should be submitted during the course of the
    proceeding,
    and
    in advance of hearing.
    The Agency’s motion
    to dismiss
    is accordingly denied.
    Lastly,
    the Board notes
    that pursuant
    to procedural
    rule
    106.711, petitioners are required to cause the publication
    of
    notice of a petition for adjusted standard within
    14 days after
    filing, and pursuant
    to 106.712, petitioners must file proof of
    notice publication within
    30 days after
    filing.
    No publication
    proof has been filed
    for this petition.
    Given the Agency’s
    motion to dismiss,
    it may be that Petitioner was awaiting
    a Board
    ruling prior to publishing notice.
    Therefore,
    on its own motion,
    the Board extends
    the time
    for filing proof
    of notice publication
    for
    30 days of the date of
    this Order.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I,
    Dorothy M.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify
    that
    the, above Order was adopted
    on
    the
    ~
    day of
    (/
    ~.
    Lt
    ,
    1990,
    by
    a vote
    of
    7—C~
    .
    /‘
    ~
    C1)
    ~
    ~
    borothy
    M.
    Gi~inn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    I
    ~fl—1fl~~

    Back to top