ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    August
    9,
    1990
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE
    OF ILLINOIS,
    Complainant,
    V.
    )
    PCB 90-69
    (Enforcement)
    MATERIAL SERVICE CORPORATION,
    )
    a Delaware corporation,
    )
    Respondent.
    DISSENTING OPINION
    (by J. Theodore Meyer):
    I dissent
    from the majority’s
    acceptance
    of the settlement
    stipulation
    in this case.
    The proposed settlement agreement
    states
    that
    respondent’s
    noncompliance
    was
    not
    economically
    beneficial,
    except
    that
    respondent saved approximately $850 in permit fees which would have
    otherwise
    been
    required.
    I
    find
    this
    statement
    to
    be
    contradictory, since by admitting that $850 was saved demonstrates
    at least some economic benefit.
    Additionally,
    I note that there
    is no mention of the economic benefit of operating the unpermitted
    equipment without
    the delay
    of applying to and waiting
    for the
    Agency
    to
    issue
    permits,
    although
    that
    language
    is
    routinely
    repeated in other stipulations of this type.
    Section
    33(c)
    of the
    Environmental Protection
    Act specifically
    requires the
    Board
    to
    consider any economic benefits accrued by noncompliance.
    I believe
    that this provision contemplates a consideration of the amount of
    all economic benefit.
    Without more specific information,
    it
    is
    impossible to know if the penalty of $4,000 even comes close to any
    savings realized by respondent.
    Finally,
    I am frustrated that, although this case was brought
    in the name of the people of the State
    of Illinois,
    there
    is no
    recognition that costs and fees could have been assessed against
    respondent.
    Ill.Rev.Stat.l989,
    ch.
    ill 1/2,
    par.
    1042(f).
    I am
    pleased that the Attorney General is beginning to bring enforcement
    cases
    in the name
    of the
    People,
    but
    I believe
    that
    settlement
    agreements
    in such cases should,
    at a minimum, recognize that the
    Board could award costs and reasonable fees.
    114—63

    2
    For these
    reasons,
    I dissent.
    \
    1~-~~--
    J.
    ‘~1’heodoreMeyer
    Board Member
    I,
    Dorothy
    M.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Dissenting Opinion was filed
    on the
    ~
    day of
    ________________,
    1990.
    (/
    /~
    ~/~/
    /~
    Dorothy M.”,thinn,
    Clerk
    Illinois
    Pdilution
    Control
    Board
    ~.
    1
    .~--(ì.~

    Back to top