ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    July
    3,
    1990
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE
    OF ILLINOIS,
    Complainant,
    V.
    )
    PCB 88—199
    (Enforcement)
    SEEGERS
    GRAIN,
    Respondent.
    DISSENTING OPINION
    (by J. Theodore Meyer):
    I dissent
    from the majority~s acceptance
    of the
    settlement
    stipulation
    in this case.
    Neither the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
    nor the Attorney General have articulated any standards as to what
    factors should be considered when negotiating a fine to be imposed
    pursuant to
    a
    settlement
    agreement.
    Additionally,
    although the
    proposed settlement agreement states that Seeger’s noncompliance
    was economically beneficial in that it delayed acquiring adequate
    noise suppression equipment,
    there is not any specific information
    on
    the
    amount
    of
    that
    economic benefit.
    Section
    33(c)
    of the
    Environmental Protection
    Act specifically
    requires
    the Board
    to
    consider any economic benefits accrued by noncompliance.
    I believe
    that this provision contemplates a consideration of the amount of
    the economic benefit, not just a statement that an economic benefit
    was realized.
    Without more specific information,
    it
    is impossible
    to know
    if the penalty of $1,000 even comes close
    to any savings
    realized
    by
    Seegers.
    I
    am
    also bothered
    by
    the
    fact
    that
    the
    stipulation actually signed by the parties provides for only half
    of the penalty originally presented at the hearing.
    Finally,
    I am frustrated that, although this case was brought
    in the name of the people
    of the State
    of Illinois,
    there
    is no
    recognition that costs and fees could have been assessed against
    Seegers.
    Ill.Rev.Stat..1989,
    ch.
    ill
    1/2,
    par.
    1042(f).
    I am
    pleased that the Attorney General is beginning to bring enforcement
    cases
    in
    the name
    of
    the
    People,
    but
    I
    believe that settlement
    agreements
    in such cases should,
    at a minimum, recognize that the
    Board could award costs and reasonable fees.
    113~1C~

    2
    For these reasons,
    I dissent.
    J
    ~.J
    Theodore Meyer
    Board Member
    I,
    Dorothy N.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Dissenting Opinion was filed
    on the
    /~
    day of
    ________________
    ,
    1990.
    Dorothy M.
    ‘Gunn,
    Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    113—20

    Back to top