ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November
29,
1990
TAZEWELL COUNTY and
)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
)
AC 90—40
(Administrative Citation)
)
(Tazewell Docket No.
90—EH—3)
STEVE ZIMMERMAN and WASTE
)
LTD.,
INC.,
Respondents.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J. Anderson):
On July
27,
1990, Steve Zimmerman and Waste
Ltd.,
Inc.
(“Z
& W”)
filed a Motion to Dismiss.
The motion comes
in response
to
the May
21,
1990 filing of an Administrative Citation by Tazewell
County pursuant
to a delegation agreement with the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (“Agency”).
On August
30,
1990
the Board issued an order directing the Tazewell County
(“Tazewell”)
and the Agency to file their
responses
to the Motion
to Dismiss by September
20,
1990.
On September
27,
1990,
the
Board granted the Agency’s September
20,
1990 motion for an
extension of time
in which to file its
response,
and directed
it
to file its response by October
31,
1990.
On October
30,
1990,
the Agency filed
its response.
In its response,
the Agency states that
it would not have
brought this action because
the violations charged
in the
Administrative Citation
(i.e., violations of
21(p)(ll)
of the
Illinois Environmental Protection Act
(“Act”)
for failure to
timely submit reports and fees)
are the subject of an agreement
between
it
and the
Z
& W.
A review of
the Agency’s response
reveals that,
prior
to the filing of the complaint in this case,
the Agency determined that
Z
& W failed to file the reports and
fees required by
35
Ill.
Adrn.
Code 858.3073,
858.3083, and
858.401(a).
On March
15,
1990,
it sent
a second notice of the
violations to
Z
&
W.
On May 17,
1990,
the Agency completed the
execution of its agreement with
Z
&
W with regard to the
delinquent reports and fees,
and that,
to date,
Z
& ~ have
complied with the agreement.
Because the Board wishes the Agency to clarify its response,
the Board asks the Agency
to provide the following
information:
116—337
—2—
1.
Is the Agency recommending that this matter be dismissed
because
it considers that no violations
of the Act have
occurred as
a
result of
its agreement with
Z
& W?
2.
Section 4(r)
of the Act states that delegation
agreements shall require that the work performed
thereunder
(
i.e.
inspecting,
investigating, and
enforcement functions)
be subject to the Agency’s
review.
Is the Agency’s statement made pursuant to this
Section 4(r)
review authority to disapprove Tazewell’s
Administrative Citation?
3.
A copy of the Delegation Agreement.
The Agency’s response
to the above questions and the copy of the
Delegation Agreement should be received by the Board on or before
December
13,
1990.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on
the
~
day of
~
,
1990, by
a vote of
7~’
A.
/L~~~/
Dorothy N. Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
~
1 6—3
38