ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October 24,
1991
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL.
ADN. CODE
)
R91—32
SUBTITLE B: AIR POLLUTION
)
(Rulemaking)
GRANITE CITY S02 EMISSION
)
LIMITATIONS
)
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.D.
Dumelle):
On its own motion the Board today opens a series of dockets
to address rulemaking required by Title
I of the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990
(“CAAA”), Public Law 101—549,
104 Stat.
2399
(November 15,
1990).
This particular docket is intended to
address the requirements for emission limitations for sulfur
dioxide for facilities located in the Granite City area.
The
purpose of opening this docket prior to submission of a proposal
is to:
*
Facilitate the notification, as soon as possible, of
all entities within the state which may have an
interest in participating in this rulemaking
proceeding,
so that everyone may have a forum to
express their views on all aspects of the timing and
content of the rules.
*
Specifically solicit the views of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (“Agency”), the
Illinois Attorney General (“AG”), the Illinois
Department of Energy and Natural Resources (“DENR”),
the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(“USEPA”), members of the regulated community and other
interest groups on the timing of this proceeding.
The
Board is today entering a scheduling Order which
establishes a date for submission of the proposal and
supporting materials.
Further,
it briefly describes an
anticipated schedule for subsequent days for hearing,
and anticipated days for Board actions.
All interested
persons are invited to submit comments, to be received
not later than November 4,
1991,
if they believe the
schedule must be amended.
Such comments must specify
how the schedule is proposed to be amended.
*
Ensure, to the maximum extent possible, that required
rulemaking will be completed in a timely fashion so
that Clean Air Act sanctions can be avoided in the
State of Illinois.
126—761
2
USEPA established the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(“NAAQS”)
for several criteria pollutants,
including ozone.
These standards were authorized pursuant to Sections 108 and 109
of the Clean Air Act,
42 U.S.C.
7408,
7409.
Section 110 of the
Clean Air Act requires that a State Implementation Plan (“SIP”)
be adopted to achieve federal air quality standards.
42 U.S.C.
7410.
The rule contemplated in this docket is intended to
satisfy a part of the federal requirements for a SIP for S02.
The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments require Illinois to submit an
S02 SIP addressing this area by early 1992.
To accomplish that goal the Board is now opening a docket to
establish a “compliance assurance” schedule in each area where it
anticipates air pollution regulation will be required in the
State of Illinois before that date.
These include:
*
RACT
-
25 Ton per year Sources
(R91-27; J. Anderson)
*
RACT
-
Geographical Expansion for the Chicago CNSA
(R91-28;
J. Theodore Meyer)
*
RACT
-
Geographical Expansion for St. Louis MSA (R91-
29; J.C. Marlin)
*
Stage II Vapor Recovery for Chicago and St. Louis Area
(R91—30;
R.
Fleinal)
*
Employee Trip Reduction Program (R91-31;
B. Forcade)
*
Granite City S02 Emission Limits (R91-32; J.D.
Duinelle)
*
Alton S02 Emission Limits
(R91—33; H.
Nardulli)
*
Southeast Chicago S02 Emission Limits
(R91-34;
3.
Anderson)
*
PM-b
Ambient Limits (R91-35;
3. Theodore Meyer)
*
Episode Regulations for PM-b
(R91—3.6; R. Flemal)
*
Contingency Measures for PM-b
(R91-37;
B. Forcade)
The Board requests specific comment from the participants to
identify any and all other ozone or non—ozone regulatory
proceedings required for submission to USEPA before November
1992. USEPA is specifically requested to provide the status of
development of guidance documents for these rules which will be
made available to the states.
These comments must be received by
the Board not later than 4:30 p.m., November 4,
1991.
The Board
specifically solicits comment from the Agency and USEPA on this
issue for both ozone and non—ozone regulatory requirements.
If
additional rulemaking is required, the Board would appreciate a
126—762
3
citation to the federal statutory or regulatory requirements and
a brief description of the rulemaking goals.
The Board will also
anticipate, for each rulemaking identified in the comments,
opening a docket and establishing a schedule for completion that
follows the concepts articulated in the schedule below.
The Board, and almost all other agencies, must comply with
the provisions of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act
(APA).
(Ill.Rev.Stat.
1989,
ch.
127, par.
1001. et seq.)
Its
provisions require notice, publication, hearing, and comment
prior to adoption of any rule.
Additionally, the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act (“Act”)
(Ill.Rev.Stat. 1989,
ch.
111 1/2,
par.
1028.2)
imposes its own requirements upon
environmental rulemaking.
In this instance, the Board
contemplates that the regulations in this docket will be proposed
and adopted pursuant to the procedures of Section 28.2 of the
Act.
That section establishes adoption procedures for federally
required rules.
The Board has considered rulemaking procedures under Section
28.2 of the Act before.
In three of those proceedings the time
required to complete the process averaged about 280 days.
See,
PM-iD Emissions Limits for the Portland Cement Manufacturing
Plant and Associated Quarry Operations Located South of the
~jinois
River in LaSalle County,
R91-6; RACT Deficiencies in the
Chicaczo Area, R91-7, and RACT Deficiencies in the Metro-East
Area, R91—8.
In one of those proceedings the proposal was
represented to be an agreed rule and in the other two, the
content of the rules was largely dictated by USEPA regulations.
In sum,
it took roughly eight and a half to nineiuonths to
complete three relatively non—controversial rulemakings.
The
Board stresses that these rulemakings did not include an EelS,
which adds about five months to the rulemaking process.
SCHEDULE FOR RULEMAKING
This schedule
is based on current Illinois law which
was earlier amended to allow an expedited EelS process
for federally required rules.
If the legislature
grants relief from any current statutory requirements,
the rulemaking process could be shortened accordingly.
Event
Day Number
Proposal Filed
1
Board Accepts Proposal
5-14
Give Notice to Clerk to Set Date for a
Minimum of Two Hearings
-
45 days before
hearing date (30 days published notice for
air rule)
126—763
4
Board Adopts 1st Notice Opinion and Order
28
(the Board meeting after the Board accepts
the proposal)
1st Notice Publication
43-50
EelS Determination
-
must make within 60 days
50-65
after accept for hearing and allow a maximum
of 6 months for the EelS
Hearings
(2)
60—90
Receipt of Transcripts
(4 working days for an
67-97
expedited transcript and 12 working days if
not expedited)
1st Notice Expires
71—95
Post—Hearing Comment Period
(2
weeks)
81-111
Give Notice to Clerk to Set Date for EelS
Hearing
—
45 days before hearing date (30
days published notice for air rule)
Preparation Time for EcIS Expires
214
EelS Hearing
235-242
Receive EelS Transcript
242-249
EcIS Post-Hearing Comment Period Expires
256-263
2nd Notice Opinion and Order Placed on
270-277
Discussion Agenda
Board Adopts 2nd Notice Opinion and Order
284—291
Proposal Submitted to
JCAR
-
JCAR
has 45 days
294-301
to review
Final Notice Opinion and Order Placed on
333-360
Discussion Agenda
JCAR
Review Period Ends
339-346
Board Adopts Final Opinion and Order
(it is
364
this final Board action,
not the filing with
the Secretary of State, that allows IEPA to
prepare and transmit the rule to USEPA)
126—7
64
5
IEPA Submits Rule to USEPA -IEPA has
378—385
indicated that it can submit rules to USEPA
within 14 to 21 days rather than 30 days
It is clear from the above schedule that a proposal should
be submitted by November
15,
1991,
if the Board is to meet the
federal deadline for those proceedings with a November 15,
1992
due date.
It is also clear from the above schedule that earlier
deadlines cannot be met, certainly if an EelS is required,
or
legislative or other relief is not available.
If the proposal
were filed with the Board by November 15,
1991,
and, pursuant to
Section 28.2(c), the Board would decide that an EelS would not be
needed, the resulting approximately five months extra time would
still leave,
at best, an extremely tight schedule for those rules
with a November 1992 deadline.
We must assume at the outset that
an EelS will be required and that DENR will use the full
statutory six months to prepare it.
The schedule only gives
significant leeway if the Board makes a “no EelS” decision.
We
emphasize, though, that the leeway can be taken up by the time
used by the participants to address complex issues, the need to
stagger final adoption of these many rules to ensure Illinois
Register publication,
etc.
In any event,
the Board must
emphasize that the fundamental purpose of this Order is to alert
all participants of the need to take the necessary steps to meet
the federal deadlines.
As is apparent from the above discussion, time is critical.
We today order that this regulatory proposal and supporting
documentation be filed with the Board not later than November 15,
1991.
In order to expedite first notice publication, the Board
requests that filings be accompanied by
a computer disk
containing the proposal in WordPerfect 5.0 format.
If the participants wish to utilize the prehearing
conference provisions of Section 27(a)
of the Act, the hearing
officer must be quickly notified.
All new proceedings identified
by the November 4,
1991 filings will be promptly assigned to a
Board Member for handling.
Phil Van Ness,
the Board’s
Intergovernmental Affairs Attorney, will co-ordinate discussions
on the status of CAAA activities of the Board.
He will
specifically interact with the Agency and USEPA to keep them
informed of the progress being made in these regulatory
proceedings.
126—765
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board
ereby certfy t at the above Order was adopted on the
4
~day of
_______________,
1991, by a vote of
7~O
~Dorothy
H.
9/inn,
Cler)~
Illinois Pc~flutionControl Board
126766