1.  
    2. Conclusion
  1. Exhibit A
  2. Exhibit C
      1. PROOF OF SERVICE

BEFORE THE
IN
THE MATTER OF:
)
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
TO
AMMONIA
)
R02-19
NITROGEN
STANDARDS
35111.
Adm. Code
)
302.212, 302.213, and 304.122
)
)
NOTICE OF FILiNG
Please see attached Service List
PLEASE
TAKE NOTICE that I have today filedwith the Office ofthe Clerk ofthe
Pollution Control Board the POST-1IEA1UNG COMMENTS ofthe flhinois Environmental
Protection Agency,
a copy ofwhich is herewithserved upon you.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Tw~
RJJiL9~
Deborah
J.
Williad~/
Assistant Counsel
Division ofLegal Counsel
DATED:
May 15, 2002
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021
North GrandAvenue East
Post Office Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217)
782-5544
)
)
RE
CE 1~/ED
CLERIç~
OFFICE
MLIV
1
7
2002
BOARD
STATE
OF
Pollut,0,~
Contr01
Board
THIS
FILING
IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

RECEIVED
CL!~K’S
OFFICE
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
~
1
7
2002
STATE OF
ILLINOIS
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
Pollution
Control Board
R02-19
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
)
(Rulemaking-Water)
AMMONIA NITROGEN STANDARDS
)
35 ILL. ADM. CODE 302.212, 302.213,
)
AND 304.122
)
POST-HEARING COMMENTS OF THE
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
NOW
COMES
the
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
(“Illinois
EPA”),
by its
attorney,
Deborah
J.
Williams,
and
hereby submits comments
in
the above rulemaking proceeding.
The Illinois
EPA
appreciates the
Illinois Pollution Control
Board’s
(“Board”)
efforts
in this rulemaking to amend the ammonia
nitrogen water quality standard and welcomes
the
opportunity
to
make
these
comments.
The
Illinois
EPA
believes
the
proposed
amendments
submitted
by
Illinois
Association
of Wastewater Agencies
(“IAWA”)
will
meet federal requirements and will continue to assure
protection of the water resources
of
the
State
of
Illinois,
while
recognizing
the
need
for
continued
development
and
utilization of these resources.
IAWA’S AMENDED PROPOSAL
The Illinois
EPA submitted pre-filed testimony of Robert Mosher in this matter on
March
1, 2002.
Mr. Mosher’s testimony was entered as Exhibit
9 at the
March 25,
2002
Chicago hearing.
In this pre-filed testimony, the Illinois EPA suggested several changes
to IAWA’s original regulatory proposal.
On April 3, 2002, IAWA filed an amended
rulemaking proposal which incorporated
all of the changes suggested by the Illinois
EPA.
In addition,
IAWA attempted to address
the issues raised by the Board at the

March
25th hearing.
The Illinois EPA agrees with
all of the changes contained
in
IAWA’s amended rulemaking proposal and believes they adequately address the issues
raised by the Board while remaining
consistent with
the federal National Criteria
Document, the
Board’s existing regulatory structure and the programmatic needs of the
Illinois
EPA.
The specific changes made by IAWA in response to the
Board’s
comments were changing the term Summer and Winter to Early Life Stages Present
and Early Life Stages Absent,
adding
the term water before the word temperature
in
several places, adding
a definition ofthe term
early life stage and changing the method
for evaluating attainment of the sub-chronic water quality standard to require that the
four samples utilized must be taken on four consecutive days.
The Illinois
EPA agrees
with
IAWA’s conclusion that inclusion of the
term indigenous
is not necessary based on
the testimony presented
by IAWA’s witness
Mr.
Robert J.
Sheehan and the
Illinois
EPA’s internal review.
TYPOGRAPHICAL SUGGESTIONS
Although the
Illinois
EPA is
in agreement with
the substance of IAWA’s amended
proposal, the Agency would like to point
out
a few minor typographical issues for the
Board’s consideration
in drafting a first notice order.
IAWA does
not add the term
“water” before the word temperature in
a few places
in the amended proposal.
These
occur in the equations found
in Section 302.212(b)(2)(A) and (B).
The Board may want
to considering adding the
term “water” before “temperature”
in these two places also.
In the equations found
in Section 302.212(b)(2), placement ofthe
phrase “Where
T
=
Temperature, degrees Celsius” is not consistent.
In Section 302.212(b)(2)(A)(ii),
the
phrase appears after the equation, while it appears before the equation in
Section
2

302.212(b)(2)(B)(ii).
The Board may want to consider achieving consistency between
the two sections by changing the equation
in
Section 302.212(b)(2)(B) to match the
equation
in Section 302.212(b)(2)(A).
In Table C-2 of IAWA’s amended proposal, titled
Temperature andpH-
Dependent Values of the CCC (Chronic Criterion) for Fish Early Life Stages Absent,
there are five instances where
it appears that the ammonia values have been rounded
to one decimal
point and reported with two decimal points.
For the values with
a pH of
6 and temperatures of 12,
13,
14,
15 and
16,
the ammonia values should be 8.17, 7.66,
7.19, 6.74
and 6.32
respectively instead of 8.20, 7.70,
7.20, 6.70 and 6.30 as reported.
Responses
to questions raised
at the March
25 and April 23 hearings
Though the
Illinois EPA
responded to most issues raised at the first and second
hearings in this matter on the
record during those proceedings, a few outstanding
issues remain to be addressed in these post-hearing
comments.
Environmental
Impact and Alternatives
At the first hearing
in this proceeding, a question was raised by Albert Ettinger
regarding whether the new ammonia water quality standard proposed by IAWA would
be
a relaxation of the current standard
in all
circumstances.
Specifically,
Mr. Ettinger
asked Mr. Sheehan:
“Is there anywhere in this proposal
in terms of the formulas that
come out of this proposal in which you would actually wind up with a stricter ammonia
standard
.
.
.
under the proposed rule than under the existing rules?”
Transcript of
Chicago hearing at 135.
Mr. Sheehan
did not know the answer to this question.
The
Illinois
EPA has looked at that question and provided a Table for the Board which
demonstrates those pH and temperature values that would result
in less stringent water
3

quality standards
under the proposal and those pH
and temperature values that would
result in stricter water quality standards
under the proposal.
See Exhibit A.
Although
for most common pH and temperature values, the equations result in
higher water
quality standard values under the proposal; for those values above the
dark line
in
Exhibit A, the new standard would result in
stricter water quality standard values.
At the Chicago hearing, testimony was presented from by David Zenz of Consoer
Townsend Envirodyne
Engineers,
Inc. regarding
a conversation
between
Mr. Zenz,
Mike Zima of DeKaIb Sanitary District and Al Keller of the
Illinois EPA regarding the
use
of breakpoint chlorination as an alternative treatment technology for ammonia nitrogen.
(Transcript at p.
80-81).
IAWA testified that during that conference call with Al Keller, he
indicated that the
Illinois
EPA would not accept use of the breakpoint chlorination
alternative for treating ammonia.
IAWA also testified that Al Keller would be sending a
letter to that effect to them.
The hearing officer requested that a copy of the
letter from
the Illinois
EPA to DeKaIb Sanitary District confirming the
Illinois EPA’s position on use
of that technology be submitted into the
record ofthis proceeding.
A letter such as that
described by IAWA was sent by the
Illinois
EPA to Mr. Zenz on March 26,
2002.
A copy
of that letter has been attached to these post-hearing comments as Exhibit B.
Submittal of Typical pH data
At the Springfield hearing, Anand Rao of the Board’s technical staff requested
that the
Illinois
EPA submit a general range oftypical pH values for some major Illinois
streams.
Attached to these comments as Exhibit C are the
pH data for six Illinois
streams covering the period January
1997 to December 2001.
The Exhibit also
4

provides the high, average,
low,
50th
percentile, 75~”
percentile and standard deviation
of the
pH values for this time period.
Implementation Issues
At both the first and second hearings the Board
raised concerns about whether
the proposal adequately established a sub-chronic water quality standard that would
address what the Board termed the
“highest four day average within the thirty
day
period” concept of the
National Criteria Document.
Transcript of Springfield hearing at
32.
IAWA made changes to its initial proposal in an attempt to address
this
issue.
The
Illinois
EPA supports the changes proposed by IAWA as the best way to ensure that the
National Criteria Document’s intent to establish distinct four day and thirty day chronic
toxicity standards
is implemented.
In addition, this language establishes water quality
standards whose attainment can be assessed with
the available or obtainable
monitoring data.
At both hearings the
Board questioned whether there was a need for an effluent
limit on ammonia dischargers under Part 304 of the
Board’s rules and whether Section
355.203(a) of the Agency’s existing procedural rules
represents an effluent limit that
should
be placed
in Part 304.
At the first and second hearings, the
Illinois
EPA
explained that Section 355.203(a)
is not expected to change following amendments to
the water quality standard proposed
in this rulemaking docket; that it is intended as a
procedure for setting water quality based permit limits that contain an adequate safety
factor to prevent violations of the
Board’s water quality standards for ammonia;
that this
provision
is not
intended to function as either a water quality standard or technology
based effluent limit; and that this provision
was adopted after extensive negotiations
5

between
Region V of the
United States Environmental
Protection Agency,
environmental groups and the
regulated community.
Though the
Board
is free to
develop an administrative
record for establishment of a technology based effluent limit
applicable to all
ammonia dischargers, the
Illinois EPA does
not believe
such a
provision
is
a necessary component of this rulemaking docket.
Conclusion
The Illinois
EPA thanks the Board for the opportunity to participate in this
rulemaking proceeding and encourages the
Board to proceed expeditiously towards the
adoption of a first notice opinion and order revising the ammonia nitrogen water quality
standards.
Respectfully submitted,
Deborah J. Williams
Assistant Counsel
Division of Legal Counsel
Dated:
May
15,
2002
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021
North Grand Avenue
East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield,
Illinois 62794-9276
6

Back to top


Exhibit A

ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
1021
NORTH GRAND AVENUE
EAST,
P.O.
Box 19276,
SPRINGFIELD.
ILUNOIS
62794-9276
RENEE
CIPRIANO,
DIRECTOR
March
26,
2002
David
R.
Zenz, Ph.D.,
P.E.
Senior Associate
CTE Engineers
300
East Wacker Drive
Suite 600
Chicago,
IL 60601-5276
Re:
DeKalb Sanitary District Ammonia Reduction Using Breakpoint Chlorination
Dear Mr.
Zenz:
The Agency received your letter dated January
28, 2002 concerning
a requestto use breakpoint chlorination
at DeKa~bSanitary District’s sewage treatment plant (STP).
As discussed by
phone
March
19, 2002,
the
Agency will
not approve the proposed use of breakpoint chlorination
to reduce ammonia from
the wastewater
treatment
plant effluent.
As we discussed
in
the teleconference
the Agency’s main
concern was with the
formation
of chlorinated organic compounds.
We also discussed the existing STP flows, the STP schematic,
the
use of only one year of flow data and future STP expansion.
The Agency believes biological treatment
is the best solution for removing ammonia in effluents.
The Agency
appreciates
your correspondence and will
continue
to
work with
DeKaib
Sanitary
District to
address the compliance schedule in their NPDES Permit requiring them to meet the stated ammonia limits
by
December2003.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the above, please contact Gary Bingenheimer at the
indicated
telephone number and address.
Since
ly,
-
Thomas G. McSwiggin,
P.E.
Manager,
Permit Section
Division
of Water Pollution Control
TGM:GWB:l:\users\epal
1 75\Ietters\dekalb
cc:
Records Unit
Rockford FOS
Michael Zima
-
DeKaIb Sanitary District
GEORGE
H.
RYAN,
GOVERNOR
217/782-0610
PRINTED ON
RECYCLED
PAPER

Exhibit
B

To the right and
below the darkened line, the new WQS is less restrictive.
Winter (Chronic)
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
Temp\pH
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Temp\pH
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Temp\pH
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Temp\pH
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
25.9
20.6
16.3
13.0
10.3
8.2
6.5
5.2
4.1
3.3
2.6
2.1
1.7
1.3
1.1
0.8
0.7
23.9
19.0
15.1
12.0
9.5
7.6
6.0
4.8
3.8
3.0
2.4
1.9
1.5
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
22.0
17.5
13.9
11.0
8.8
7.0
5.5
4.4
3.5
2.8
2.2
1.8
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6
20.3
16.1
12.8
IO.2
8.1
6.4
5.1
4.1
3.2
2.6
2.1
1.6
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.5
18.8
14.9
11.8
9.4
7.5
5.9
4.7
3.8
3.0
2.4
1.9
1.5
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.5
17.3
13.8
10.9
8.7
6.9
5.5
4.4
3.5
2.8
2.2
1.8
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
16.0
12.7
10.1
8.0
6.4
5.1
4.0
3.2
2.6
2.0
1.6
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
Winter
(Acute)
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
145.0
115.2
91.5
72.7
57.8
45.9
36.5
29.0
23.1
18.4
14.6
11.6
9.3
7.4
5.9
4.7
3.8
133.7
106.2
84.4
67.1
53.3
42.4
33.7
26.8
21.3
16.9
13.5
10.7
8.6
6.8
5.5
4.4
3.5
123.3
98.0
77.8
61.9
49.2
39.1
31.1
24.7
19.7
15.6
12.5
9.9
7.9
6.3
5.0
4.0
3.2
113.8
90.4
71.8
57.1
45.4
36.1
28.7
22.8
18.1
14.4
11.5
9.2
7.3
5.8
4.7
3.7
3.0
105.1
83.5
66.3
52.7
41.9
33.3
26.5
21.1
16.8
13.3
10.6
8.5
6.8
5.4
4~3
3.5
2.8
97.1
77.1
61.3
48.7
38.7
30.8
24.5
19.5
15.5
12.3
9.8
7.8
6.3
5.0
4.0
3.2
2.6
89.7
71.3
56.7
45.0
35.8
28.5
22.6
18.0
14.3
11.4
9.1
7.3
5.8
4.6
3.7
3.0
2.4
Summer (Chronic)
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
19.9
15.8
12.6
10.0
7.9
6.3
5.0
4.0
3.2
2.6
2.0
1.6
1.3
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.6
18.5
14.7
11.7
9.3
7.4
5.9
4.7
3.7
3.0
2.4
1.9
1.5
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.5
17.2
13.6
10.8
8.6
6.9
5.5
4.4
3.5
2.8
2.2
1.8
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
16.0
12.7
10.1
8.0
6.4
5.1
4.1
3.2
2.6
2.1
1.6
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
14.8
11.8
9.4
7.5
5.9
4.7
3.8
3.0
2.4
1.9
1.5
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
13.8
11.0
8.7
7.0
5.5
4.4
3.5
2.8
2.2
1.8
1.4
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
12.9
10.2
8.1
6.5
5.2
4.1
3.3
2.6
2.1
1.7
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
12.0
9.5
7.6
6.0
4.8
3.8
3.1
2.4
1.9
1.6
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.4
11.2
8.9
7.1
5.6
4.5
3.6
2.9
2.3
1.8
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
10.4
9.7
8.3
7.7
6.6
6.2
5.3
4.9
4.2
3.9
3.3
3.1
2.7
2.1
2.5
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
Summer
(Acute)
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
115.1
91.5
72.7
57.8
46.0
36.6
29.2
23.2
18.5
14.8
11.8
9.4
7.6
6.1
4.9
4.0
3.2
106.9
85.0
67.6
53.7
42.8
34.0
27.1
21.6
17.2
13.7
11.0
8.8
7.1
5.7
4.6
3.7
3.0
99.4
79.0
62.8
50.0
39.8
31.6
25.2
20.1
16.0
12.8
10.2
8.2
6.6
5.3
4.3
3.5
2.8
92.4
73.5
58.4
46.5
37.0
29.4
23.5
18.7
14.9
11.9
9.5
7.6
6.1
4.9
4.0
3.2
2.6
86.0
68.4
54.4
43.3
34.4
27.4
21.8
17.4
13.9
11.1
8.9
7.1
5.7
4.6
3.7
3.0
2.5
80.0
63.6
50.6
40.3
32.1
25.5
20.3
16.2
13.0
10.4
8.3
6.7
5.4
4.3
3.5
2.9
2.3
74.5
59.3
47.1
37.5
29.9
23.8
19.0
15.1
12.1
9.7
7.8
6.2
5.0
4.0
3.3
2.7
2.2
69.5
55.2
43.9
35.0
27.8
22.2
17.7
14.1
11.3
9.0
7.2
5.8
4.7
3.8
3.1
2.5
2.1
64.7
51.5
41.0
32.6
26.0
20.7
16.5
13.2
10.5
8.4
6.8
5.4
4.4
3.6
2.9
2.4
1.9
60,4
48.0
38.2
30.4
24.2
19.3
15.4
12.3
9.8
7.9
6.3
5.1
4.1
3.3
2.7
2.2
1.8
56.4
44.8
35.7
28.4
22.6
18.0
14.4
11.5
9.2
7.4
5.9
4.8
3.9
3.1
2.6
2.1
1.7
To the left
and above
the dardkened line, the new WQS is more restrictive.

Back to top


Exhibit
C

pH
Result
Sample Date
Value
High
Average
Low
D-23, ILLINOIS RIVER AT MARSEILLES,
IL
03/11/97
7.59
04/15/97
7.67
05/19/97
7.90
07/14/97
8.06
09/08/97
8.06
11/04/97
7.55
12/16/97
7.72
01/29/98
7.75
03/12/98
7.64
04/07/98
7.64
05/04/98
7.74
06/22/98
7.75
07/20/98
8.50
09/21/98
7.64
11/17/98
7.64
12/15/98
7.74
04/26/99
7.15
05/24/99
7.43
06/28/99
7.65
08/25/99
7.83
09/27/99
7.80
12/07/99
7.29
03/13/00
7.82
04/24/00
7.40
05/22/00
7.31
06/29/00
7.72
08/08/00
8.19
03/14/01
7.96
04/10/01
8.10
04/30/01
7.34
05/23/01
7.91
06/28/01
8.36
07/26/01
7.63
09/06/01
8.16
10/18/01
7.44
8.50
7.75
7.15
50th Percentile
Median
Standard
75th Percentile
Deviation
7.72
7.91
0.30

pH
Sample Date
Value
High
Average
Low
Median
DT-09,
FOX RIVER AT SOUTH ELGIN,
IL
01/07/97
8.17
02/18/97
8.12
03/26/97
8.55
05/28/97
8.60
07/11/97
8.54
09/04/97
8.19
11/06/97
7.73
12/17/97
8.27
02/04/98
8.07
03/17/98
8.36
04/09/98
7.78
06/01/98
8.70
07/06/98
8.98
08/10/98
8.63
09/15/98
7.64
11/12/98
8.37
11/12/98
8.37
12/07/98
8.83
12/07/98
8.83
03/18/99
8.49
04/13/99
8.43
05/27/99
8.46
06/25/99
8.23
08/24/99
7.99
08/24/99
7.99
09/21/99
8.78
09/21/99
8.78
10/21/99
8.25
10/21/99
8.25
12/02/99
8.23
12/02/99
8.23
01/05/00
8.50
02/15/00
7.84
03/16/00
8.48
04/24/00
8.34
04/24/00
8.34
06/05/00
7.88
06/12/00
8.02
07/06/00
8.05
07/06/00
8.05
07/06/00
8.05
07/10/00
8.06
07/18/00
8.38
07/31/00
8.02
08/21/00
8.49
09/05/00
8.12
09/11/00
8.13
09/18/00
8.44
Result
50th Percentile
Standard
75th
Percentile
Deviation

pH
Result
50th Percentile
Standard
Sample Date
Value
High
Average
Low
Median
75th
Percentile
Deviation
09/25/00
7.89
09/29/00
8.18
09/29/00
8.20
09/29/00
8.20
11/14/00
8.61
01/10/01
7.97
03/07/01
7.97
03/07/01
7.97
04/04/01
8.74
04/04/01
8.74
04/27/01
8.74
06/04/01
8.18
08/10/01
8.50
09/25/01
8.15
11/06/01
8.46
12/26/01
8.23
8.98
8.29
7.64
8.24
8.49
0.30115

pH
Result
Sample Date
Value
High
Average
Low
E-26, SANGAMON RIVER AT RIVERTON, IL
01/02/97
7.90
02/11/97
7.40
03/11/97
7.90
04/28/97
7.90
07/08/97
8.00
08/25/97
7.80
09/16/97
7.80
10/07/97
8.00
11/06/97
7.50
12/29/97
8.20
02/18/98
7.90
03/24/98
7.30
05/05/98
7.90
06/02/98
7.70
08/11/98
7.71
09/09/98
8.30
10/28/98
7.80
12/02/98
7.60
01/27/99
7.50
03/01/99
7.30
04/06/99
7.80
05/13/99
7.60
06/14/99
7.30
08/09/99
8.21
09/14/99
7.70
10/28/99
7.60
11/29/99
7.96
12/27/99
8.17
02/07/00
8.35
03/23/00
8.04
05/25/00
7.90
08/14/00
8.51
09/11/00
7.84
10/11/00
6.96
12/11/00
8.21
01/11/01
7.59
02/26/01
7.32
03/27/01
8.02
04/24/01
7.59
05/23/01
7.70
07/18/01
7.93
08/09/01
8.26
10/22/01
7.80
11/26/01
7.67
8.51
7.81
6.96
50th Percentile
Median
Standard
75th
Percentile
Deviation
7.80
8.00
0.32275

pH
Result
Sample Date
Value
High
Average
Low
G-22, DES
PLAINES RIVER
NEAR DES PLAINES, IL
01/27/97
7.45
03/05/97
7.93
04/29/97
8.16
06/02/97
8.09
06/17/97
7.82
08/14/97
7.90
09/30/97
7.91
11/05/97
7.97
12/08/97
7.88
02/03/98
7.75
03/03/98
7.91
04/15/98
7.88
05/29/98
7.92
06/22/98
7.97
08/05/98
7.81
10/28/98
7.69
12/01/98
6.54
03/05/99
8.00
04/01/99
8.04
05/18/99
7.73
06/22/99
7.72
08/26/99
7.53
09/30/99
7.67
11/03/99
7.67
12/16/99
7.72
02/09/00
7.82
03/01/00
7.58
04/13/00
8.31
05/18/00
7.58
07/11/00
7.59
08/10/00
8.00
09/28/00
7.92
03/19/01
7.85
04/05/01
7.96
05/02/01
7.87
06/05/01
7.77
07/25/01
7.59
09/13/01
8.01
11/08/01
7.57
50th Percentile
Median
Standard
75th Percentile
Deviation
12/19/01
7.44
8.31
7.79
6.54
7.84
7.94
0.27973

pH
Result
Sample Date
Value
High
Average
Low
N-li,
BIG MUDDY RIVER AT PLUMFIELD, IL
02/05/97
6.60
03/05/97
7.00
04/02/97
7.30
05/20/97
7.20
06/10/97
7.20
07/17/97
7.40
08/21/97
7.40
10/22/97
7.70
12/03/97
7.40
02/02/98
7.60
03/04/98
7.90
04/22/98
7.10
05/21/98
7.30
06/18/98
7.10
07/22/98
6.70
09/02/98
7.80
10/14/98
6.90
11/24/98
7.10
01/06/99
7.20
02/09/99
7.10
03/23/99
7.60
05/19/99
7.00
07/07/99
6.60
08/16/99
7.00
09/14/99
7.10
10/26/99
7.30
12/07/99
7.00
01/04/00
6.70
02/16/00
6.80
05/25/00
6.90
06/20/00
6.80
07/19/00
6.80
09/06/00
6.50
10/11/00
6.80
12/07/00
7.10
01/11/01
7.20
02/07/01
7.30
03/20/01
7.20
05/01/01
7.10
05/31/01
7.10
07/16/01
6.90
08/20/01
6.90
10/17/01
6.70
12/05/01
6.30
7.90
7.08
6.30
50th Percentile
Median
Standard
75th
Percentile
Deviation
7.10
7.30
0.34096

pH
Result
Sample Date
Value
High
Average
Low
P-06, ROCK RIVER AT COMa, IL
01/08/97
8.18
03/04/97
7.79
04/22/97
8.80
05/21/97
8.74
07/07/97
8.42
08/06/97
8.43
09/23/97
8.42
11/18/97
9.00
01/07/98
8.10
02/05/98
8.30
03/1 8/98
8.50
04/13/98
8.09
05/19/98
8.30
06/30/98
7.94
07/28/98
8.69
08/18/98
8.67
09/22/98
8.18
11/18/98
8.19
12/16/98
8.39
02/04/99
7.91
03/16/99
8.59
04/12/99
8.02
06/07/99
8.09
07/06/99
8.47
08/10/99
8.47
09/21/99
8.39
10/18/99
8.65
11/16/99
8.09
01/25/00
7.50
02/24/00
7.74
04/03/00
8.58
05/09/00
8.24
06/14/00
7.59
08/01/00
8.85
09/06/00
8.52
11/21/00
8.19
02/06/01
7.24
03/28/01
8.34
04/18/01
8.40
05/22/01
8.22
08/07/01
8.27
11/28/01
8.18
9.00
8.28
7.24
50th Percentile
Median
Standard
75th Percentile
Deviation
8.30
8.49
0.36497

)
STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
)
SS
COUNTY OF SANGAMON
)
)
PROOF OF SERVICE
I,
the undersigned, on oath state that I have
served
the
attached
POST-HEARING COMMENTS of
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency upon the person to whom it is directed, by placing a copy in
an envelope addressed to:
Please see attached service list.
and mailing
it from Springfield, Illinois on
May
15, 2002 with sufficient postage affixed
as indicated
above.
~7o~
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN
TO
BEFORE ME
this
15thi
day ofMay
2002
~)m\L
~
Notary Public
OFFICIAL
SEAL
BRENDA BOEHNEP
NOTARY
PUBLIC,
STATE
CF
IlLINOIS
~MY
COMMISSION
EXPIRES
1
~-i4-2005~
THIS
FILING
IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

SERVICE LIST
R02-19
May
15,
2002
Dorothy Gum, Clerk
Illinois PollutionControl Board
100 West Randolph,
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois
60601
Catherine Glenn
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100
West Randolph, Suite
11-500
Chicago, Illinois
60601
Tim
Bachman
Urbana/Champaign Sanitary District
1100 East University Avenue Post Office Box 669
Urbana, Illinois
61803
Mike Callahan
Bloomington Normal
Water Reclamation District
Post Office Box 3307
Bloomington, Illinois
61702-3307
Larry Cox
Downer’s Grove Sanitary District
2710 Curtiss Street
Downer’s Grove, Illinois
60515
Dennis
Daffield
Department ofPublic Works City of Joliet
921
East Washington Street
Joliet, Illinois
60433
Jim Daugherty
Thorn CreekBasin Sanitary District
700
West End Avenue
Chicago Heights, Illinois
60417
Sheila Deely
Gamder, Carton and Douglas
321 North Clark Street, Suite 3400
Chicago, Illinois
60610-4795
Albert Ettinger
Environmental Law and Policy Center
35
East Wacker Drive,
Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois
60601-2110
Susan M. Franzetti
Sonnenschein Nath and Rosenthal
8000
Sears Tower
233
South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois
60606
Lisa Frede
Chemical Industiy Council
9801
West Higgins Road, Suite 515
Rosemont, Illinois
60018
James T. Harrington
Ross and Hardies
150
North Michigan, Suite 2500
Chicago, Illinois
60601
Katherine Hodge
Hodge, Dwyer Zeman
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois
62705-5776
Margaret Howard
Hedinger and Howard
1225
South Sixth Street
Springfield, Illinois
62703
Richard Lanyon
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District
100 East Erie, Room 400
Chicago, Illinois
60611
Robert Messina
Illinois
Environmental Regulatory Group
215 East Adams Street
Springfield, Illinois
62701
Tom Mulh
Fox Metro Walter Reclamation District
682 State Route 31
Oswego, Illinois
60543
Irwin Polls
Metropolitan Water Reclamation
District of Chicago
Environmental Monitoring Division
6001 West Pershing Road
Cicero, Illinois
60804-4112
David Zenz
CTE Engineers
303 East Wacker Drive, Suite 600
Chicago, Illinois
60601
Michael Zima
DeKalb Sanitary District
Post Office Box 624
DeKalb, Illinois
60115
THIS
FILING
IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

Back to top