ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January 24,
    1991
    PEOPLE
    OF
    THE
    STATE
    OF
    ILLINOIS,
    )
    )
    Complainant,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 90—62
    )
    (Enforcement)
    SURE-TAN
    INC.,
    an Illinois
    )
    corporation,
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER
    OF THE BOARD
    (by J.
    C. Narlin):
    This matter is before the Board on Respondent Sure—Tan,
    Inc.’s
    Motion to Reopen Hearing filed December 27,
    1990.
    No
    response has been received from Complainant Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency
    (“Agency”).
    The motion requests that the hearing of December 18,
    1990,
    be reopened because an Agency engineer did not appear to testify
    “thus causing a void in our defense.”
    The Respondent states that
    the witnesses’ appearance at the hearing was “expected” and
    mentions ?hat additional witnesses are planned.
    The Respondent fails to give adequate justification for
    reopening the hearing of December 18,
    1990.
    Respondent
    apparently did not subpoena the attendance of the “expected”
    witness nor has Sure—Tan given any indication of why the
    engineer’s testimony is necessary.
    Finally, Sure—Tan gives no
    reasons as to why the “additional witnesses” were not present or
    called at the prior hearing.
    The Respondent’s motion is,
    therefore, denied.
    IT
    IS
    SO
    ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Cl~rkof the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, h~by certify that
    above Order was adopted on the
    ~-~“
    day of __________________________,
    1991 by a vote
    of
    7—o
    Dorothy N.
    G)1j(n, Clerk’
    Illinois Poflution Control Board
    118—149

    Back to top