ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    December 20, 1990
    PEOPLE OF
    THE
    STATE OF ILLINOIS
    )
    Complainant,
    PCB 90—127
    v.
    )
    (Enforcement)
    )
    WESTVACO CORPORATION,
    Respondent.
    DISSENTING OPINION (by J.D. Dumelle):
    I dissent from the Majority’s approval today of the
    stipulation for the following reasons.
    It is my belief that enforcement of the permit requirements
    constitutes a crucial aspect of the Illinois regulatory control
    system. Yet the way it is being handled currently, as reflected
    by the instant case, is so deficient as to render consent to the
    stipulation impossible. The current process merely runs through
    the criteria in a generic manner which sheds no understanding as
    to why this case was settled or how the fine stipulated to was
    calculated. It is virtually impossible to discern one
    stipulation from another.
    The case at bar not only reflects poorly on a significant
    aspect of regulatory enforcement, but continues this Board’s
    years of ratification of low Nnes in the absence of mitiqating
    factors. The resulting message to the regulated industry is
    hardly one which could be said to “enhance compliance with the
    Act”. On
    the contrary, the clear message being sent by the
    approval of stipulations such as the one at bar remains that the
    permit requirements in Illinois can always be ignored at little
    or no cost. I come to this conclusion when the majorit~’of this
    Board regularly approves stipulated agreements as per-.-.
    ~eu
    the instant case where there exists no explanation o~.:nico
    ~3(c~
    factors
    were
    applicable or considered or why, in riir~~
    contravention of the complaint, were attorney’s fees reco.’erable
    to Illinois not requested.
    For these reasons, I respectfully
    c~~
    Ja ob D. Dumelledissent.
    4tk~&
    L R-CEC-USNR (Ret)
    B ard Member
    117—9 1

    —2—
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Opinion was
    Board
    submitted
    herebyon certif~the
    ___________________
    t theday above~of
    _______________
    ________________,
    enting
    1991.
    nfl, Clerk
    Illinois ~~ution Control Board
    117—92

    Back to top