ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January 18, 1991
    LAND
    AND
    LAKES COMPANY, JMC
    )
    OPERATIONS,
    INC. and NBD
    TRUST
    COMPANY
    OF ILLINOIS,
    )
    AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST
    NO.
    2624EG,
    Petitioners,
    v.
    )
    PCB
    91—7
    )
    (Landfill Siting)
    VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by B. Forcade):
    This action is an appeal filed January
    15, 1991 pursuant to
    Section 40.1
    (a) of the Environmental Protection Act
    (“Act”)
    (Ill.Rev.Stat.
    ch. 111—1/2,
    par. 1040.1
    (a)).
    Land and Lakes
    Company, JMC Operations,
    Inc. and NBD Trust Company of
    Illinois,
    as Trustee under
    trust No. 2624EG appeal the decision of the
    Village of Romeoville denying site location suitability
    approval.
    On January 16,
    1991, Will County filed a “Petition for
    Leave for Will County to Intervene in Support of the Refusal by
    the Village Board of Romeoville, Will County,
    Illinois, to Grant
    Siting Approval”.
    On January 18, 1991,
    Land and Lakes filed an
    “Objection to Petition for Leave to Intervene”.
    Also on January
    18, 1991,
    Paul and Ann Jurca, John and Marlene Jurca, Kelby and
    Mary
    Briddick, Lawrence and Diane Kollins, James and Ann Dralle,
    Robert and Jean Hastert,
    Robert C. and Doris Hastert, Blanche
    Hassert, and Fillup, Inc.,
    filed a “Petition for Leave
    to
    Intervene
    in Support of the Refusal by the Village Board of
    Romeoville,
    ~Jil1County,
    Illinois,
    to Grant Siting Approval”.
    The Board will not rule on this petition until the time for any
    response by Romeoville has run.
    Record Before the County Board
    P.A.
    82—682, also known as SB—172, as codified in Section
    40.1(a)
    of the Act, provides that the hearing before the Board
    is
    to “be based exclusively on the record before the county board or
    governing body of the municipality”.
    The statute does not
    specify
    who
    is to file with the Board such record or who
    is to
    certify to the completeness or correctness of the record.
    As the Village of Romeoville alone can verify and certify
    what exactly
    is the entire record before
    it,
    in the interest of
    protecting the rights of all parties to this action, and
    in order
    118—115
    to satisfy the intention of SB—l72, the Board believes that the
    Village of Romeoville must be the party to prepare and file the
    record on appeal.
    The Board suggests that guidance in so doing
    can be had by reference to Rules 321 through 324 of the Illinois
    Supreme Court Rules.
    The record shall contain legible versions
    of all documents,
    transcripts, and exhibits deemed to pertain to
    this proceeding from the initial filing by the siting applicant
    through and including final action by the local government
    body.
    The record shall contain the originals of all documents,
    shall be arranged as much as is possible in chronological
    sequence, and shall be sequentially numbered, placing the letter
    “C” before the number of such page.
    In addition to the actual
    documents which comprise the record,
    the Village of Romeoville
    Clerk shall also prepare a document entitled “Certificate of
    Record on Appeal” which shall be an index of the record that
    lists the documents comprising the record and shows the page
    number upon which they start and end.
    Seven copies of the
    certificate, seven copies of the transcript of the Village of
    Romeoville hearing and three copies of any other documents
    in the
    record shall be filed with the Board, and a copy of the
    certificate shall be served upon the petitioner(s).
    The Clerk of
    the Village of Romeoville
    is given
    21 days from the date of this
    Order to “prepare, bind and certify the record on appeal”
    (Ill.
    Supreme Court, Rule 324).
    If the record
    is not legible,
    is not
    sequentially numbered, or fails to include an appropriate index
    of the record,
    the clerk of the Pollution Control Board may
    refuse to accept the document for filing.
    Waiver of Decision Deadline
    Section 40.1(a) provides that
    if there
    is no final action by
    the Board within 120 days, petitioner may deem the site location
    approved.
    The Board has construed identical “in accordance with the
    terms of” language contained in Section 40(b) of the Act
    concerning third—party
    appeals of the grant of hazardous waste
    landfill permits as giving the person who had requested the
    permit a) the right to a decision within the applicable statutory
    time frame
    (now 120 days), and b)
    the right to waive
    (extend) the
    decision period (Alliance for a Safe Environment, et al.
    v. Akron
    Land Corp.
    et al., PCB 80—184, October
    30,
    1980).
    The Board
    therefore construes Section 40.1(b)
    in like manner, with the
    result that failure of this Board to act in 120 days would allow
    the site location applicant to deem the site location approved.
    Pursuant
    to Section 105.104 of the Procedural Rules,
    it
    is each
    party’s responsibility to pursue its action, and to insist that a
    hearing on the petition
    is timely scheduled in order to allow the
    Board to review the record and to render its decision within 120
    days of the filing of the petition.
    118—116
    —3—
    Transcription Costs
    The issue of who has the burden of providing transcription
    in Board site location suitability appeals has been addressed in
    Town of Ottawa,
    et al.
    v.
    IPCB, et al., 129 Iii. App.
    3rd,
    472
    N.E.2d 150 (Third District, 1984).
    In that case,
    the Court
    ordered the Board to assume transcription costs
    (472 N.E.2d at
    155).
    The Supreme Court denied leave to appeal on March
    14,
    1985.
    In cognizance of this ruling,
    the Board will provide for
    stenographic transcription of the Board hearing in this matter.
    This matter
    is accepted for hearing.
    Hearing must be
    scheduled within 14 days of the date of
    this Order and completed
    within 60 days of the date of this Order.
    The hearing officer
    shall inform the Clerk of the Boarc
    f the time and location of
    the hearing at least
    40 days in advance of hearing so that public
    notice of hearing may be published.
    After hearing,
    the hearing
    officer shall submit an exhibit list, written schedule for
    submission of briefs
    if any and all actual exhibits to the Board
    within
    5 days of the hearing.
    Any briefing schedule shall
    provide for final filings as expeditiously as possible and in no
    event later than 70 days from the date of this Order.
    If after appropriate consultation with the parties,
    the
    parties fail to provide an acceptable hearing date or
    if after an
    attempt the hearing officer
    is unable to consult with the
    parties, the hearing officer shall unilaterally set a hearing
    date in conformance with the schedule above.
    This schedule will
    only provide the Board a very short time period to deliberate and
    reach a decision before the due date.
    The hearing officer and
    the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding as much as
    possible.
    The hearing officer may extend this schedule only on a
    waiver of the decision deadline by the site location suitability
    applicant and only for the equivalent or fewer number of days
    that the decision deadline
    is waived.
    Such waivers must be
    provided
    in writing to the Clerk of the Board.
    Any waiver must
    be an “open waiver” or a waiver of decision until a date
    certain.
    Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
    of hearing,
    no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the site
    location suitability applicant provides an open waiver or a
    waiver to a date at
    least 120 days beyond the date of the motion
    to cancel hearing.
    This should allow ample time for the Board to
    republish notice of hearing and receive transcripts from the
    hearing before the due date.
    Any order by the hearing officer
    granting cancellation of hearing shall include a new hearing date
    at least 40 days
    in the future and at least
    30 days prior to the
    new due date and the Clerk
    of the Board shall be promptly
    118—117
    —4—
    informed of the new schedule.
    Because this proceeding
    is the type for which the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Act sets a very short statutory deadline
    for making a decision, absent a waiver,
    the Board will grant
    ~extensionsor modifications only in unusual circumstances.
    Any
    such motion must set forth an alternative schedule for notice,
    hearing, and final submissions, as well as the deadline for
    decision, including response time to such a motion.
    However, no
    such motion shall negate the obligation of the hearing officer to
    establish a Scheduling Order pursuant to the requirements of this
    Order, and to adhere to that Order until modified.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify
    ~1i~t
    the above Order was adopted on
    the
    /?~
    day of
    1991, by a vote
    of
    7—~
    S
    Control Board
    118—118

    Back to top