ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November
8,
1990
THE ENSIGN-BICKFORD
COMPANY
)
AND THE TROJAN CORPORATION,
)
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 88—156 and 88—168
(Consolidated)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
(Variance)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE
BOARD
(by M.
Nardulli);
This matter comes before the Board on a motion to modify Board
order
filed
on
October
11,
1990
by petitioner
Ensign-Bickford
Company and Trojan Corporation.
On October 30,
1990, the Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(Agency)
filed
its
response
objecting to the motion to modify.
On August 10,
1989,
the Board granted petitioner a five-year
variance from 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 237.102 prohibiting open burning
and
authorized
petitioner
to
open
burn
explosive
waste
and
explosive contaminated waste pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 237.103
subject to certain conditions.
By its instant motion, petitioner
seeks to modify Condition 0 of the Board’s order which restricts
the amounts of certain wastes which petitioner is allowed to open
burn.
Condition 0 provided that Ensign-Bickford
shall
not burn
more than 100 lbs. of explosive—contaminated materials per week and
that
Trojan
shall
not
burn
more
than
460
lbs.
of
explosive-
contaminated materials per week.
Petitioner proposes that a single limitation be imposed upon
Ensign-Bickford and Trojan so that Condition 0 would be modified
to
allow
petitioner
to
open
burn
3,035
lbs.
of
explosive-
contaminated materials per week.
According to petitioner,
it
is
no longer able to meet the current limitation because petitioner’s
old supplier ceased operations and petitioner’s new supplier
of
explosives packages TNT
in telescoping
boxes
which
weigh
seven
times
that
of the old
supplier’s packaging.
Consequently,
the
amount of material to be
open burned has
increased.
Petitioner
asserts that this
increase would not pose any increased adverse
environmental impact.
The
Agency
opposes
the
motion
for
modification
because
granting the motion would result in an additional 64.35 tons per
year
of explosive—contaminated materials being
burned,
which
is
four times the amount currently authorized be the Board’s order of
August
10,
1989.
The Agency also notes that while the requested
modification may not cause.a violation of the NAAQS,
it will result
in an adverse environmental impact.
116—07
2
Unlike those situations where a petitioner seeks modification
of an
internal deadline imposed in
a variance,
the modification
requested by petitioner would
significantly alter
a
substantive
condition imposed by the Board
in granting the initial variance.
The Agency
correctly
notes
in
its
response
that
granting
the
requested modification
by way
of
a
motion
rather
than
a
new
petition for variance deprives the public of the opportunity to
participate at hearing.
Because the requested modification would
significantly
alter
the
limitations
imposed
by
the
Board
in
granting the variance, the Board hereby denies petitioner’s motion
for modification.
Petitioner may file a new petition for varaince
if it so chooses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby c rtify that the above order was adopted on the
2~-’
day of
__________________
,
1990 by
a vote of
7O
c-~_~
,~.
Dorothy N. ~nn,
Cle’rk
Illinois Po’llution
Control Board
116—08