ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June 27,
1991
PIERCE
& STEVENS,
CORP.,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
V.
)
PCB 91—100
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD by
(M. Nardulli):
This matter
comes
before the Board
on petitioner
Pierce
&
Stevens Corporation’s filing of a petition for review challenging
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s (Agency) imposition
of permit conditions.
Section
40(a) (1)
of the Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
provides that an applicant may seek review of the Agency’s permit
decision by filing a petition for hearing with the Board within 35
days.
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1989,
ch.
111
1/2,
par.
1040(a)(1).)
Section
105.102(a)(2)
of
the Board’s procedural
rules
governing
permit appeals provides that such
a petition for hearing shall be
filed with the Board “within 35 days of the date of mailing of the
Agency’s final decision.”
(35
Iii. Adm.
Code 105.102(a) (2).)
Here, the Agency’s permit from which appeal is sought is dated
Nay
10,
1991——
35
days
from
Nay
10,
1991
is
June
14,
1991.1
Petitioner’s petition for hearing was date-stamped by the Clerk on
June 18,
1991.
Because the petition
for hearing
is date-stamped
after the due date,
“the time of mailing shall be deemed the time
of filing.”
(35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.102(d).)
Hence, the Board must
look to petitioner’s certificate of service to determine the time
of
filing.
(35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
101.143(a)(1).)
Petitioner’s
certificate of service
states that the petition for hearing was
served
on the Board
by personal delivery on June
18,
1991,
four
days after June 14,
199•l.
1
Section 101.109 of the Board’s general procedural rules
provides
that
“c)ornputation
of
any
period
of
time
prescribed by this Chapter
or the Act shall begin with
the first calendar day
following the day
on which the
act, event, or development occurs and shall run until the
end of the last day, or next business day if the last day
is
a
Saturday,
Sunday,
or
national
or
state
legal
holiday.”
(35 Ill. Mm.
Code 101.109.)
2
Based upon the above,
it appears that petitioner’s petition
for
hearing
is
untimely
filed.
Therefore,
the
Board
hereby
rescinds
its
set for hearing order adopted
at the June
20,
1991
board meeting.
The Board directs the parties to address the issue
of
timeliness
of
the
filing
of
the
instant
petition
by filing
simultaneous responses to this order to be received by the Board
no later than 4:30 p.m.
on July 8,
1991.
In particular, the Board
directs the parties’ attention to the Board’s decision in Finks
&
Austman v.
IEPA, PCB 90-243
(February 7,
1991).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy
N.
Gunn,
Clerk of
the
Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby ce
ify that the above Order was adopted on the
~
day of
_____________
,
1991 by a vote of
o
‘7
~
Dorothy N. ~inn, Clerk
Illinois P~1lutionControl Board