ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 9,
    1991
    OLIN CORPORATION
    (Joliet Plant),
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 89—72
    )
    (Variance)
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by B. Forcade):
    This matter comes before
    the Board on
    a motion filed on
    March
    14,
    1991 by Olin Corporation, Joliet Plant
    (“Olin”),
    requesting that the Board modify certain internal deadlines
    in
    the variance granted to Olin by Board Order
    of February
    7,
    1991.
    That variance
    is
    from the Board’s air
    regulations
    governing the emission of particulate matter,
    found at
    35 Ill.
    Adrn. Code 212.321,
    and applies
    to the A and B building scrubbers
    at the Joliet fa:ility.
    The variance will expire on March
    1,
    1992, and was issued by the Board subject
    to various conditions,
    including the installation of new emissions control equipment and
    monitoring,
    testing and reporting requirements.
    Olin’s request
    for modification involves the A Building scrubbers which are
    temporarily not
    in use, and,
    therefore,
    variance conditions
    relating
    to A Building scrubbers will not be met.
    Olin claims
    that,
    since December
    1990, one of Olin’s major
    phosphate customers unexpectedly and significantly reduced
    its
    production order
    for 1991 and other customer orders are also
    lower than expected for 1991.
    Motion at
    p.
    4 and Exhibit
    A,
    p.
    2.
    As
    a result of the decreased demand for its product, Olin has
    temporarily discontinued operations at its A building since
    “production capacity at Buildings B and C currently meets and
    will for
    the forseeable future meet the market demands
    for Olin’s
    STPP sodium
    tripoly phosphate
    products”.
    Exhibit A,
    pp.
    2-3.
    Olin’s contention
    is
    that, without the ongoing operations at
    Building A, compliance work at either
    the A—North or A—South
    stacks
    in accordance with the conditions as specified
    in the
    Board’s February
    7,
    1991 variance order cannot be met.
    Olin
    asserts that the A—North scrubber had already achieved marginal
    compliance but final modifications, testing and evaluation would
    be delayed.
    The A—South scr.ubber was
    to be modified by January
    1,
    1992 and tested by March
    1,
    1992,
    and these activities might
    also be delayed.
    Olin has suggested some modifications
    of
    the variance to
    allow compliance—related work
    on the A building to be carried out
    on a schedule that
    is t!ed
    to the start
    of operations at A—Nort~
    and A—South stacks.
    The exact date
    for resumption of operations
    122—35

    —2—
    at the A Building is not known.
    However, Olin does not request
    that the period of
    the variance end other than on March
    1, 1992
    as specified in the February
    7, 1991 Board Order.
    Thus,
    final
    compliance would
    still
    be required by the same March
    1,
    1992
    deadline.
    Progress Under Current Variance
    Olin represents that substantial progress has been made at
    Building B pursuant
    to the conditions of the variance granted on
    February 7,
    1991.
    “For the B—South scrubber, Olin installed the
    new scrubber and completed other modifications by early December,
    1990,
    three weeks ahead of schedule.”
    Motion at p.
    3.
    Olin has
    initiated emissions testing at the B—South scrubber and has
    reported significant reductions
    in emissions to the Agency.
    Motion at pp.
    3—4; Progress report at Exhibit
    C,
    pp.
    1—2.
    For
    the B—North scrubber, Olin completed all modifications on January
    21, 1991.
    Olin reported that emissions were higher
    than expected
    and more modifications were made.
    Additional
    testing
    is to.be
    performed.
    Motion at
    p.
    4;
    Exhibit
    C at p.
    1.
    Olin notes,
    too,
    that since economic conditions forced the
    shutdown
    of Building A,
    no particulate matter
    is now emitted from
    the A—North and A—South scrubbers.
    Motion at pp.
    5—6.
    Olin states
    that
    it has
    taken numerous cost cutting measures
    due to reduced demand,
    including closing certain administrative
    buildings, consolidating personnel,
    and operating only one of the
    plant’s three coal-fired boilers.
    The adverse economic situation
    prevents compliance with the current variance with respect
    to the
    A—North and A—South scrubbers since
    stack testing can only be
    undertaken during production activity.
    Motion at pp.
    4—5.
    Olin
    does not state whether
    its financial condition prevents making
    expenditures to modify the non—complying A—South scrubber,
    but
    the total shut down of
    that scrubber
    to some extent obviates the
    present need for emissions control at that source.
    Requested Modification of Variance
    Olin has requested the Board to add a new paragraph
    12
    and
    to make certain changes
    in paragraphs
    2,
    3, and
    5 of the Board’s
    Order of February
    7,
    1991.
    Certain other minor changes are added
    here to paragraphs
    4,
    7,
    and
    11 on the Board’s own initiative,
    and these are intended to add clarity to the revised sections.
    The modifications are shown below by overstriking and underlining
    new language.
    2.
    Olin shall complete all testing and minor modifications
    on the A—North scrubber as follows:
    A)
    Not later than Peb~a~y~87 ~99~ four weeks after
    resuming operation of the A—North kiln, Olin shall
    complete all engineering matrix tests and the
    evaluation of any modifications,
    if necessary.
    In
    122—36

    —3—
    addition, Olin shall notify the Agency in the first
    monthly report subsequent to Olin’s resuming
    operations at A—North.
    Olin shall inform the
    Agency of the date when operations resumed and of
    all activities completed or planned to achieve
    compliance using the A—North scrubber.
    B)
    Not later than five months after resuming operation
    of the A—North kiln,
    but
    in no event later than
    March
    1,
    1992, Olin shall complete its evaluation
    of the impact of engineering modifications at A—
    North.
    Note:
    The Board added
    the March
    1,
    1992 deadline
    to Olin’s
    suggested language
    in paragraph
    2(B).
    Olin had suggested
    in its
    request that paragraph 2(B)
    should be added as paragraph 5(A).
    The Board finds
    that placement here
    in paragraph 2(B) would
    be
    more appropriate.
    Similarly,
    the deadlines for evaluation of
    engineering modifications at the B—North and B—South scrubbers
    will also be moved from paragraph 5(A)
    since paragraph 5(A)
    is
    already being modified at Olin’s request.
    3.
    Olin shall complete modifications
    m~e~th the
    A—Nerth
    ~e~bbe~
    me
    fiea~ier~s
    at the B—North scrubber,
    as
    follows:
    A)
    Not later than April
    1,
    1991,
    Olin shall complete
    modifications to the B—North scrubber, ~a~ed en
    the
    ~tix
    ~
    a~A—Nerth ~i1~- and
    P2erform engineering matrix tests
    for all products.
    B)
    Not later than July 31,
    1991, Olin shall complete
    the evaluation of the impact of any engineering
    modifications,
    if
    necessary,
    and all tests,
    evaluations and further engineering modifications.
    4•
    *
    *
    *
    B)
    Not later
    than June
    30,
    1991, Olin shall complete
    matrix tests,
    evaluation of the performance of the
    additional scrubber and optimize unit performance.
    C)
    Not later
    than September 30,
    1991, Olin shall
    evaluate any further engineering modifications,
    if
    necessary.
    Note:
    The September
    30 date was inadvertently omitted
    from
    the Board’s earlier order.
    5.
    Olin shall complete modifications to the A—South
    scrubber, as follows:
    122—37

    —4—
    A~)-
    Net 3tet’ than
    cy
    3~~99~
    ea~n
    ~ha~3 eemp~ete
    4t~eve~uatienef the 4mpaet ef engeerin~
    med~f4eat~en~
    at A—North and B—North7 a~we~a~
    the perfermartee of the add4tiena3
    ~er~bber at B—
    Se~tth~
    AB)
    If operation at the A—South kiln will be
    resumed on
    or before January
    1,
    1992,
    then nNot later than
    January 1,
    1992, Olin shall complete engineering
    modifications
    to the A—South scrubber, based on the
    evaluations made pursuant
    to paragraphs
    2(B),
    if
    completed,
    3(3) and 4(B) Ef3~here~rt.
    In addition,
    Olin shall also notify the Agency
    in the first
    monthly report subsequent
    to Olin’s resuming
    operations at A—South.
    Olin shall inform the
    Agency of the date when operations resumed and
    of
    all activities completed or planned to achieve
    compliance using the A—South scrubber.
    Be)
    :n any event, nNot later
    than March
    1,
    1992 Olin
    shall complete matrix tests and optimize unit
    performance and complete any further engineering
    modifications, if necessary.
    Note:
    The substance of paragraph 5(A)
    of the original
    variance has been reorganized and placed
    in paragraphs
    2(3),
    3(B)
    and 4(B), rather
    than modified and placed
    in paragraphs
    5(A) and
    5(B) as suggested by Olin.
    Paragraph 5(3) has been modified and
    now
    is shown as paragraph 5(A).
    Olin’s suggested paragraphs
    5(C)
    and
    (D) are addressed
    in the modified paragraphs
    5(A) and
    (B)
    above.
    However, Olin’s suggested paragraphs 5(C) and
    (D) only
    seemed to focus on what happens
    if A—South kiln operation
    is
    resumed before January
    1,
    1992 without providing the necessary
    compliance plan
    if operation begins after January
    1,
    1992.
    Therefore,
    the Board’s new paragraph 5(C)
    states that in any
    event testing, optimization, and further modifications must meet
    the March
    1,
    992 deadline.
    The Board also notes
    that Olin
    correctly identified
    a typographical error
    in the Board’s earlier
    Order when
    the Board referred in paragraph 5(3)
    to paragraph E(l)
    when the Board intended
    to refer
    to paragraph 5(A).
    The
    reference will now be
    to paragraphs
    2(B),
    3(B),
    and 4(B).
    7.
    Olin shall evaluate its progress and submit
    a report by
    October
    1,
    1991 indicating whether compliance is
    anticipated by the end of the variance period.
    ~f
    eemp±~anee4~net ant~e4patedythe report shaH ~ne~de
    a ~repe~a~ for an a±ternat~emethod to aehte~e
    eemp~aneewith a time ~ehed~e
    for ~ta ~mp±ementat~en
    that eemp±~anee±seehie~edby Mareh
    ~-
    ~99~
    Note:
    Since
    the requested modification is itself a proposal
    to achieve compliance
    in a form not consistent with the variance
    previously granted,
    no further changes are anticipated.
    Any
    122—38

    —5—
    further modification must again be submitted to the Board.
    *
    *
    *
    11.
    That wWithin forty—five days oe the grant of the
    variance, Petitioner shall execute and forward
    to Renee
    A.
    Stadel,
    Division of Legal Counsel, Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency,
    P.O.
    Box 19276,
    Springfield,
    Illinois,
    62794—9276,
    a. Certificate of
    Aöceptance and Agreement
    to be bound by all terms and
    conditions of the granted variance.
    This grant
    of
    variance shall be null and void
    if Petitioner
    fails
    to
    execute and deliver
    its certification in accordance with
    this paragraph.
    12.
    The period of this variance shall,
    in any event,
    expire
    on Marcb
    1,
    1992.
    Note:
    This twelfth condition has been suggested by Olin.
    The Board believes that paragraph
    1 clearly states the expiration
    of the variance, but accepts
    this suggested revision as
    a
    restatement
    of Olin’s unequivocal commitment
    to fully comply
    by
    March
    1,
    1992.
    Olin states,
    “Under any scenario,
    however, Olin
    does not propose to extend the overall period of the variance.”
    Motion at
    p.
    5.
    Conc1usion
    Olin’s request appears reasonable based on the circumstances
    presented in their petition.
    The Board finds
    that it
    is
    appropriate
    to provide for the relief
    requested by Olin and to
    make minor corrections
    to the Order, provided compliance will be
    achieved by the same March
    1,
    1992 deadline.
    Based on Olin’s request,
    the Agency’s supporting comments
    and the Board’s evaluation of Olin’s
    representations, the Board
    believes the modifications are appropriate and involve no
    substantial adverse environmental impact.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of
    law.
    ORDER
    The Board hereby modifies
    the variance granted to Olin
    Corporation, Joliet Plant,
    by Board Order of February 7,
    1991.
    The variance with modifications
    is reproduced here in its
    entirety.
    Olin Corporation
    is hereby granted
    a variance from
    35
    Ill. Adm. Code 212.321
    as applied to the scrubbers
    in Buildings A
    and B, Joliet Plant,
    Joliet,
    Illinois, subject
    to the following
    terms and conditions:
    122—39

    —6—
    1.
    The variance period shall extend from January
    24, 1991 until March 1,
    1992.
    2.
    Olin shall complete all testing and minor
    modifications on the A—North scrubber as
    follows:
    A)
    Not later than four weeks after resuming
    operation of the A—North kiln, Olin shall
    complete all engineering matrix tests and
    the evaluation of any modifications,
    if
    necessary.
    In addition, Olin shall
    notify
    the Agency
    in the first monthly
    report subsequent to Olin’s resuming
    operations at A—North.
    Olin shall inform
    the Agency of
    the date when operations
    resumed and of all activities completed
    or planned
    to achieve compliance using
    the A—North scrubber.
    3)
    Not later than five months after resuming
    operation of the A—North kiln,
    but
    in no
    event
    later than March
    1,
    1992, Olin
    shall complete
    its evaluation of the
    impact of engineering modifications at A—
    North.
    3.
    Olin shall complete modifications at the B—
    North scrubber,
    as
    follows:
    A)
    Not later than April
    1,
    1991, Olin shall
    complete modifications to the B—North
    scrubber and perform engineering matrix
    tests
    for all products.
    B)
    Not later than July
    31, 1991, Olin shall
    complete the evaluation of the impact of
    any engineering modifications,
    if
    necessary,
    and all tests, evaluations and
    further engineering modifications.
    4.
    Olin shall
    install an additional scrubber
    (BECO Smoke Ring Contactor and Mist Master)
    at
    B—South and implement the optimization
    schedule as
    follows:
    A)
    Not
    later than January
    31,
    1991, Olin
    shall
    install the BECO scrubber system.
    B)
    Not later than June
    30,
    1991,
    Olin shall
    complete matrix tests,
    evaluation of the
    performance of the additional scrubber
    and optimize unit performance.
    122—40

    —7—
    C)
    Not later than September 30,
    1991, Olin
    shall evaluate any further engineering
    modifications,
    if necessary.
    5.
    Olin shall complete modifications to the A—
    South scrubber, as follows:
    A)
    If operation at the A—South kiln will be
    resumed on or
    before January
    1,
    1992,
    then not later than January
    1,
    1992,
    Olin
    shall complete engineering modifications
    to the A—South scrubber, based on the
    evaluations made pursuant
    to paragraphs
    2(B),
    if completed,
    3(3) and 4(3).
    In
    addition, Olin shall also notify the
    Agency in the first monthly report
    subsequent
    to Olin’s resuming operations
    at A—South.
    Olin shall inform the Agency
    of the date when operations resumed and
    of all activities completed or planned to
    achieve compliance using the A—South
    scrubber.
    B)
    In any event,
    not later than March
    1,
    1992 Olin shall complete matrix tests and
    optimize unit performance and complete
    any further engineering modifications,
    if
    necessary.
    6.
    Monthly progress reports are to be made to the
    Agency.
    The reports should be submitted
    to:
    Regional Manager
    Division of Air Pollution
    Control
    Illinois ~nvironmental
    Protection Agency
    1701 First Avenue
    Maywood,
    Illinois
    60153
    7.
    Olin shall evaluate its progress and submit
    a
    report by October
    1,
    1991 indicating whether
    compliance
    is anticipated
    by the end of the
    variance period.
    8.
    Olin shall maintain the scrubbers consistent
    with its optimization and maintenance schedule
    which was attached as Exhibit
    D to the Third
    Amended Petition.
    122—4 1

    —8—
    9.
    Olin shall test to insure compliance, prior
    to
    expiration of the variance period.
    Notification
    is
    to be given to the Agency no
    later than fifteen days prior to compliance
    testing.
    10.
    Olin shall comply with all provisions of any
    construction permits issued by the Agency for
    additional scrubbers for the tripoly A and B
    buildings.
    11.
    Within forty-five days of the grant of the
    variance, Petitioner shall execute and forward
    to Renee A. Stadel,
    Division of Legal Counsel,
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
    P.O.
    Box 19276, Springfield,
    Illinois, 62794—9276,
    a Certificate of Acceptance and Agreement to
    be bound by all terms and conditions of the
    granted variance.
    This grant of variance
    shall be null and void if Petitioner fails
    to
    execute and deliver its certification in
    accordance with this paragraph.
    The form of
    Certification shall be as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I
    (We), _________________________
    ,
    hereby
    accept and agree
    to be bound by all terms and
    conditions of the Order of the Pollution
    Control Board
    in PCB 89—72,
    May
    9,
    1991.
    Petitioner
    Authorized Agency
    Title
    Date
    12.
    The period of this variance shall,
    in any
    event,
    expire on March
    1,
    1992.
    122—42

    —9—
    Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act,
    Ill. Rev.
    Stat. 1987,
    ch. lll~,par.
    1041,
    provides for appeal of
    final
    Orders of the Board within
    35 days.
    The Rules of the Supreme
    Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    J.D. Dumelle abstained.
    I,
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on
    the
    ~2
    day of ______________________,
    1991, by a vote
    of
    ~
    *
    ~.
    Dorothy M.
    G4kin, Clerk
    Illinois Pol’~utionControl Board
    122—43

    Back to top