ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 26, 1991
VILLAGE OF FOX RIVER GROVE,
Petitioner,
PCB 91—104
v.
)
(Variance)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
DISSENTING OPINION (by J.D.
Duinelle and B. Forcade):
We dissent in this case because we believe
a hearing should
be held.
To date,
three objections have been filed opposing the
grant of this variance.
Unfortunately, the only objection which
was
filed
timely,
and
this
mandated
a
hearing
was
withdrawn.
After
this,
however,
the McHenry County State’s Attorney as well
as
a
private
citizen
requested
a
hearing.
In ~flyvariance hearing the Board has the authority, pursuant
to
Section
37(a)
of
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Act,
to
order
a
hearing
should
it
feel
the
need
to do
so.
In
this
particular case, the Village of Fox River Grove has indicated that
industrial solvents are present within its water supply.
We would
like to know the identity of the source of this pollution,
where
it
is located
in respect to the well, how long it has been going
on, what the village intends to do about it and what health effects
are predicted for the residents who regularly consume this water.
Although
we
realize
that
an
expedited
decision
has
been
requested
by
the
petitioner
and
that
development
may
be
stalled
by
a
normal
variance
period,
we
are
of
the
opinion
that
safeguarding
the
public’s
water
supply
far
outweighs
the
possibility
of
delaying
construction.
Accordingly, we would set this matter for hearing
in order to accumulate all information possible.
For these reasons, we respectfully dissent.
Member
P.E.
Board Member
125—525
2
I, Dorothy H.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board
hereby
certif~r ~hat
the
above
Dss
g
Opinion
was
submitted on the
__________
day of
____________________,
1991.
‘7
~
~.
~
Dorothy M. GuW, Clerk
Illinois Pol1i~tionControl Board
125—52 6