ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July
 11.,
 1991
SEXTON ENVIRONMENTAL
SYSTEMS,
 INC.
 )
Petitioner,
V.
 )
 PCB 91—4
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
ORDER OF
THE
BOARD
 (by J. Anderson):
On May 30,
 1991,
 the Environmental Protection Agency
(~Agency”)filed a motion for
 reconsideration of the Board’s
Order of April
 25, 1991.
 Sexton Environmental Systems,
 Inc.
(“SES”)
 filed
 a response on June
 12,
 1991.
 The Board’s Order
struck Special Condition #29 of
 a two year experimental permit
issued by the Agency on December
 3,
 1990 to Sexton Environmental
Systems,
 Inc.
 (SES)
 “to develop a solid waste management site
 to
treat hazardous
 (infectious)
 hospital waste”.
 (SES Pet.
 Ex.
 1,
January
 7,
 1991).
 Special Condition #29 made SES subject
 to the
hazardous waste treatment fee requirements of Section 22.2of
 the
Environmental Protection Act
 (Act).
The motion for reconsideration is granted;
 however,
 the
Board declines
 to modify its Order.
The Agency raised an issue not previously considered by the
Board,
 the Illinois Appellate Court decision
 in National
Environmental Services Corp.
 v.
 Illinois Pollution Control Board
and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
 No.
 4—90-0702
 (4th
Dist.
 Ill., April
 23,
 1991)).
 In that case the court affirmed
the Board’s determination that National Environmental Services
Corp.
 (NESC)
 treatment by incineration was subject
 to the
treatment
 fee requirements of Section 22.2 of the Act.
Even
 if one were to view,
 as
 it appears does the
 court,
hazardous (infectious) hospital waste as a hazardous waste under
the definition of “Hazardous Waste”
 in Section 3.15 of the Act,
we do not believe,
 given
 the distinguishing factual situation in
the
 instant case, that the court’s
 reasoning in the NESC case
controls here.
124—5 1
—2—
It should be noted that SES’s application requested,
 in
treatment terms,
 approval
 to deal with only the infectious
characteristic of
 the medical waste,
 and the experimental permit
was issued on that basis.
 It
 is this biological character of the
waste that the proposed method
 is designed to change.
 (See
Section 3.49 of the Act.).
 And the change must be complete.
Where treatment of infectious characteristics of living organisms
in medical waste are involved, nothing short of complete
treatment constitutes any treatment.
 This
 is
 in contrast
 to
partial treatments
 for other characteristics of waste, such as pH
or chemical, where partial treatment can make these wastes less
hazardous.
 Unless the ability of living organisms
 to divide and
multiply
 is completely eliminated, they have the potential
 to
reconstitute their
 numbers.
In the NESC case,
 it was not at
 issue that incineration
 is a
treatment method that can eliminate the infectious
characteristics of the waste.
 In this case,
 it
 is the issue.
SES has yet to demonstrate that the proposed treatment method
 is,
in fact, designed to change
 the biological character of the waste
in terms of eliminating
 its infectious characteristics.
We find nothing else
 in the arguments*
 that the Board has
not already considered or would otherwise cause it
 to reverse
itself.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. Dumelle,
 B. Forcade and R.
 Flemal dissented
I,
 Dorothy M.
 Gunri, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, he~bycertify that the above Order was adopted on
the
 //
 day of
_______________
 ,
 1991,
 by a vote of
_________
~
 /~
 orothy M. ,,$unn, Clerk
Illinois P
 lution Control Board
*
 We note that HB 2491 has been adopted by the legislature.
 If
signed by the Governor,
 it will become effective on January
 1,
1992.
 Included
 in its provisions
 is,
 by January
 1,
 1992, the
elimination of the term, and all regulation of,
 “hazardous
hospital waste”.
 Instead,
 “potentially infectious medical
waste”, newly defined, will be regulated and
 it
 is specifically
not a hazardous waste,
 but rather
 a special waste with its own
fee provisions.
124—52