ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    November 19, 1992
    OLIN CORPORATION,
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 92—175
    )
    (Permit Appeal)
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by R.C. Flemal):
    On November 9, 1992, Olin Corporation filed a petition for
    hearing to review the denial by the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency of its RCRA closure plan permit. Accompanying
    the petition is a motion for Charles E. Merrill and Amy L. Wachs
    to appear
    pro hac vice.
    That motion is granted.
    In addition, on page 20 of its petition, Olin “demands that
    certain documents be incorporated as part of the Record in this
    proceeding”. The Board notes that 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    105.102 (a) (4) requires that the Agency file the entire Agency
    record within 14 days which shall include the application,
    correspondence with the applicant, and the denial. After the
    Agency files its record, should Olin find that record deficient,
    it may file an appropriate motion at that time.
    This matter is accepted for hearing.
    This matter concerns closure and post-closure care issues,
    and the parties are particularly directed to Board opinions and
    orders in Browning-Ferris Industries v. EPA, PCB 84-136, May 5,
    1988, aff’d, 179 Ill. App. 3d 598, 534 N.E.2d 616 (2d Dist.
    1989) Narley-Ingrid (USA), Inc. v. EPA, PCB 88-17, January 19,
    1989; and Testor Corp. v. EPA, PCB 88-191, November 2, 1989 £or
    discussions of standards of review and burdens of proof. The
    only issues before the Board are whether correct permitting
    procedures were followed and whether the application demonstrates
    that the Environmental Protection Act and Board regulations will
    or will not be violated.
    For each issue, the Board expects, and strongly encourages
    the parties to state the applicable regulatory law and relevant
    facts, with appropriate record citations, which demonstrate that
    a violation is likely or unlikely to occur. The parties are
    urged to focus on RCRA Update, USEPA Regulations, R87—39,
    February 25, 1988 and June 16, 1988 and R87—26, December 3, 1987.
    0137-0223
    2
    Hearing must be scheduled within 14 days of the date of this
    order and completed within 60 days of the dat of this order.
    The hearing officer shall inform the Clerk of the Board of the
    time and location of the hearing as expeditiously as possible but
    at least 40 days in advance of hearing so that public notice of
    hearing may be published. After hearing, the hearing officer
    shall submit an exhibit list, and all actual exhibits to the
    Board within 5 days of the hearing. Any briefing schedule shall
    provide for final filings as expeditiously as possible and in no
    event later than 70 days from the date of this order.
    If after appropriate consultation with the parties, the
    parties fail to provide an acceptable hearing date or if after an
    attempt the hearing officer is unable to consult with the
    parties, the hearing officer shall unilaterally set a hearing
    date in conformance with the schedule above. This schedule will
    only provide the Board a very short time period to deliberate and
    reach a decision before the due date. The hearing officer and
    the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding as much as
    possible.
    Within 10 days of accepting this case, the Hearing Officer
    shall enter a Hearing Officer Scheduling order governing
    completion of the record. That order shall set a date certain
    for each aspect of the case including: briefing schedule,
    hearing date(s), completion of discovery (if necessary) and pre—
    hearing conference (if necessary). The Hearing Officer
    Scheduling order may be modified by entry of a complete new
    scheduling order conforming with the time requirements below.
    The hearing officer may extend this schedule only on a
    waiver of the decision deadline by the petitioner and only for
    the equivalent or fewer number of days that the decision deadline
    is waived. Such waivers must be provided in writing to the Clerk
    of the Board. Any waiver must be an “open waiver” or a waiver of
    decision until a date certain.
    Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
    of hearing, no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the
    petitioner provides an open waiver or a waiver to a date at least
    120 days beyond the date of the motion to cancel hearing. This
    should allow ample time for the Board to republish notice of
    hearing and receive transcripts from the hearing before the due
    date. Any order by the hearing officer granting cancellation of
    hearing shall include a complete new scheduling order with a
    new
    hearing date at least 40 days in the future and at least 30 days
    prior to the new due date and the Clerk of the Board shall be
    promptly informed of the new schedule.
    Because this proceeding is the type for which the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Act sets a very short statutory deadline
    for making a decision, absent a waiver, the Board will grant
    Di
    37-O22~
    3
    extensions or modifications only in unusual circumstances. Any
    such motion must set forth an alternative schedule for notice,
    hearing, and final submissions, as well as th~deadline for
    decision, including response time to such a motion. However, no
    such motion shall negate the obligation of the hearing officer to
    establish a scheduling order pursuant to the requirements of this
    order, and to adhere to that order until modified.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy N. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Bo~,rd, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
    /~E~iday of
    ___________________,
    1992, by a vote of
    7 ~
    ~A.
    Dorothy M. 4~nn, Clerk
    Illinois P~lution Control Board
    0137-0225

    Back to top