ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February 25, 1993
    THE GRIGOLEIT COMPANY,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    PCB 92—23
    )
    (Permit Appeal)
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER
    OF THE BOARD (by J. Anderson):
    On February 16, 1993, The Grigoleit Company (Grigoleit)
    filed a joint status report in response to the Board’s January
    21, 1993 order and a motion to continue. In its January 21, 1993
    order, the Board directed the parties to file status reports with
    the Board by February 16, 1993. On February 18, 1993, Grigoleit
    provided a waiver of the decision deadline through June 30, 1992.
    In its motion, Grigoleit requests the Board to continue this
    matter and require the parties to file a status report on or
    before March 16, 1993. In support of its request, Grigoleit
    states that it and the Agency have been engaged in settlement
    negotiations which would, if successful, culminate in the
    settlement of this case as well as the following three cases:
    PCB 90-135, The Griaoleit ComDanv y. Illinois Environmental
    Protection Aaency PCB 91-157, People of the State of Illinois v.
    The GricToleit Company and PCB 92-110, In the Matter of Trade
    Secret Claim by The Grigoleit Company.
    Grigoleit adds that it submitted a written draft settlement
    proposal to the State on December 6, 1992. On January 6, 1993,
    the State provided its written response to the proposal. On
    January 6, 1993, Grigoleit and the State met to discuss the
    State’s response. On February 2, 1993, Grigoleit submitted a
    written answer to the State’s written response. The State has
    informed Grigoleit that it will provide its written reply on or
    before February 19, 1993. Grigoleit and the State have
    tentatively agreed to meet on February 25, 1993, to conduct
    negotiations. Finally, Grigoleit asserts that the Agency has no
    objection and has authorized Grigoleit to file the status report
    as a joint response and motion.
    We again point out that the Board, in its October 29, 1992
    and January 21, 1993 orders, reminded the parties that they were
    obligated, via a September 21, 1992 Board order, to contact the
    hearing officer if they wished to hold another hearing in this
    matter. The Board stated that it intended to make a final
    determination in this matter by the decision deadline (i.e., at
    0139-01499

    2
    that time, December 11, 1992) if there was no second hearing and
    if no waiver was forthcoming. Although the decision deadline is
    now June 30, 1993, the Board again cautions the parties that the
    timing of settlement negotiations or the desire for another
    hearing must take into account the Board’s intent to make a
    timely determination in this matter.
    In light of the above filings and Grigoleit’s waiver of the
    decision deadline, the Board grants Grigoleit’s motion to
    continue. The parties are directed to file status reports in
    this matter. Such status reports are to be received by the Board
    no later than March 16, 1993.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
    ____________
    day of
    _________________,
    1993, by a vote of
    ~
    Dorothy M.M~nn, Clerk
    Illinois P~orlutionControl Board
    0139-0500

    Back to top