ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 13,
1992
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 90—63
(Enforcement)
CITY OF EAST MOLINE,
)
Respondent.
PAMELA M.
CIARROCCHI, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON
BEHALF OF COMPLAINANT;
WILLIAM PHARES,
PHARES
& CHICKRIS,
APPEARED ON BEHALF OF
RESPONDENT.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by R.C. Flemal):
This matter comes before the Board upon
a complaint filed
April
18,
1990 on behalf of the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency (Agency),
by and through its attorney, Roland W. Burns,
Attorney General of the State of Illinois, against the City of
East Moline,
located in Rock Island County,
Illinois
(East
Moline).
The complaint alleges that East Noline has violated
Section 12(a)
of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (Act),
Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1991,
ch.
111 1/2, par.
1012(a), and 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 304.105 of the Board’s rules and regulations.
A hearing was held on July 14,
1992 in Rock Island,
Illinois. The parties presented a Stipulation and Proposal for
Settlement
(Settlement Agreement)
at hearing.
The Settlement Agreement sets forth facts relating to
the
nature,
operations and circumstances surrounding the claimed
violations.
East Moline neither admits nor denies the alleged
violations.
East Moline agrees to pay a civil penalty of seven
thousand five hundred dollars
($7,500)’.
The Board has authority to impose a penalty where the
parties have stipulated to a penalty, but not to a finding of
violation.
See, Chemetco,
Inc.
v
Illinois Pollution Control
Board
(5th Dist.
1986),
140 Ill. App.3d
,283,
488 N.E.2d 639,
The Board notes that the Settlement Agreement also
discusses the adjusted standard petition by East Moline currently
pending before the Board, AS 90-9.
We have reviewed the
Settlement Agreement and believe that it does not prejudge the
outcome on the adjusted standard request.
0135-0261
2
643; and Archer Daniels Midland v. Pollution Control Board
(3rd
Dist.
1986),
140 Ill.App.3d 823, 489 N.E.2d 887.
The Board finds the Settlement Agreement acceptable under 35
Ill.
Adin.
Code
103.180.
This
Settlement
Agreement
in
no
way
affects
respondent’s
responsibility
to
comply
with
any
federal,
state or local regulations, including but not limited to the Act
and the Board’s pollution control regulations.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
1)
The Board hereby accepts the Stipulation and Proposal
for Settlement executed by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency and the City of East Moline,
concerning its operations
located
in Rock Island
County,
Illinois.
The Stipulation and Proposal for
Settlement are incorporated by reference as though
fully set forth herein.
2)
The City of East Noline shall pay the sum of seven
thousand five hundred dollars
($7,500.00) within
30
days of the date of this order.
Such payment shall be
made by certified check or money order payable to the
Treasurer of the State of Illinois, designated to the
Environmental Protection Trust Fund,
and shall be sent
by First Class mail to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Division
2200 Churchill Road
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield,
IL 62794—9276
The City of East Moline shall also write its Federal
Employer Identification Number or Social Security
Number
on
the
certified
check
or
money
order.
Any such penalty not paid within the time prescribed
shall
incur
interest
at
the
rate
set
forth
in
subsection
(a)
of Section 1003 of the Illinois Income
Tax Act,
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1991,
ch.
120, par.
10—1003),
as now or hereafter amended, from the date of payment
is due until the date payment is received.
Interest
shall not accrue during the pendency of an appeal
during which payment of the penalty has been stayed.
3)
The City of East Moline shall cease and desist from the
alleged
violations.
0135-0262
3
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act,
Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1991,
ch. l1l~,par.
1041, provides for appeal of final
orders of the Board within 35 days.
The Rules
of the Supreme
Court of
Illinois establish filing requirements.
(But see also
35
Ill. Adm. Code 101.246, Motions for Reconsideration,
and
Castenada v.
Illinois Human Rights Commission
(1989),
132 Ill.2d
304,
547 N.E.2d 437.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certi~ythat the abov~opinion and order was
adopted on the
/5LL
day of
__________________,
1992,
by
a
vote of
7-c2
.
4~J
Dorothy M. 9~nn,Clerk
Illinois Pq)(lution Control Board
0135-0263