ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    July 9, 1992
    NORTH SHORE
    )
    SANITARY DISTRICT,
    )
    )
    Petitioner,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 92—92
    )
    (Variance)
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by B. Forcade):
    On June 19, 1992, North Shore Sanitary District (North
    Shore) filed a petition for variance for its Waukegan Treatment
    Plant. This petition was filed in response to an April 25, 1991
    Board order in R86-3 that refused North Shore’s filing of an
    “Amended Petition” and suggested that the filing of a petition
    for variance may be proper. North Shore filed the amended
    petition to satisfy a condition of a wastewater treatment works
    loan from the Environmental Protection Agency (Agency). North
    Shore asserts that it did not receive a copy of the Board order
    until June 9, 1992, when a copy was faxed from the Agency. A
    review of the Board’s procedures and records provides no
    explanation why North Shore did not receive a copy of the order.
    The Board recognizes the difficulty that North Shore has
    encountered in attempting to comply with the loan condition. The
    Board also notes that North Shore is not solely responsible for
    the inappropriate captions and the delay in filing in this
    matter. North Shore filed the “Amended Petition” at the
    instruction of the Agency and claims to have not been promptly
    notified of the Board’s refusal to accept that petition.
    However, the Board is compelled to follow the requirements of the
    Environmental Protection Act and the Board’s rules and
    regulations and insist that all filings satisfy the required
    standards.
    While the Board finds that a request for variance is proper
    in these circumstances, the petition is deficient in that it
    fails to provide:
    1. A request for hearing on the petition if desired by
    petitioner; or, in the alternative, a statement waiving
    a hearing accompanied by such affidavits or other proof
    in support of the material facts alleged in the
    petition as the petitioner may submit,. sufficient to
    enable the Board, if it so decides, to rule upon the
    petition without a hearing, as required by 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 104.124.
    0135-0067

    2
    2. The information required by 35 Ill. Adm. Code 104.121.
    and 104.122(b). The applicable information includes
    information on: the business and activity of the
    petitioner (104.121(b)), the materials discharged from
    the operation (104.121(d)), environmental impact of the
    variance (104.102(g)), measures to be taken during the
    variance to minimize the impact (104.121(j)), arbitrary
    and unreasonable hardship (104.121(k)) and consistency
    with Federal regulations (104.122(b).) While some of
    this information was addressed in the rulemaking
    proceeding it is necessary to update this information
    and include the applicable information in the petition
    for variance.
    3. Proof of service (35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.143) showing
    that a copy of the petition for variance was filed with
    the Agency. (35 Ill. Adm. Code 104.120.)
    Unless an amended petition for variance is filed within 45
    days of the date of this order; curing the above-noted defect(s),
    this matter will be subject to dismissal. The Board notes that
    for purposes of calculation of the decision deadline pursuant to
    Section 38 of the Act, the filing of an amended variance petition
    will restart the Board’s 120 day deadline.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board hereby cert that the above order was adopted on the
    ________day of
    ,
    1992, by a vote of
    ~‘
    ,/~
    ~
    ~Dorothy M. c~?in, Clerk
    Illinois po~j1utionControl Board
    0135-0068

    Back to top