ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May
6,
1993
SANCAI~1ONCOUNTY,
Petitioner,
v.
)
AC 93-2
(SCDPH—93--AC—l)
MARY ROSE ROBSON,
WILLIAM
)
(Administrative Citation)
EDDINGTON, AND ANN EDDINGTON
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(J. Anderson):
On January
19,
1993,
Sangainon County filed an Administrative
Citation (“AC”)with the Board.
The Environmental Protection Act
(“Act”)
allows parties
35
days from the date of service to appeal
the AC.
(415 ILCS 5/31.1(b)
(4)
(1992).)
The respondents did riot
file
a petition for review within 35 days.
On March
11,
1993,
the Board entered a default order in this matter.
The default
order found that the respondents had violated section 2l(p)(l)
of
the Act by causing
or allowing the open dumping of litter.
On
April
13,
1993,
the respondents filed a motion for
reconsideration.
On April 26,
1993,
Sangamon County filed a
response to the respondents’ motion for reconsideration.
In their motion for reconsideration, respondents state that
they have been
in the process of purchasing the property in
question since June,
1992.
They also state that the property was
covered with litter in June of
1992,
and that they have been
“aggressively cleaning the site” until bad weather
in November of
1992, prevented further cleaning.
(Not.
at
1.)
Respondents also
state that
in February,
1993,
they contacted someone to remove
the debris however, the person’s tractor was broken and he could
not immediately remove the debris.
(Mot.
at 1.)
In March,
1993,
respondents made arrangements for the debris to be removed and
they report that the hauling away of the debris is now finished.
(Mot.
at
1.)
Sangamon County in its response states that the arguments in
respondents’ motion do not justify their failure to respond to
the AC within thirty-five days after service.
(Resp. at 1.)
Additionally,
Sangamon County argues that remedial efforts do not
justify the finding of no violation.
(Resp.
at 1.)
As the Board has previously held, the Act does not give the
Board the statutory authority to provide for removal
of the
litter after the issuance of an AC as a reason to find no
violation.
Additionally, clean up of a site is not a mitigating
factor under the AC program.
(See,
IEPA v.
Jack Wright (August
0
L~2-O059
2
30,
1990),
AC 89-227,
114 PCB 863 and IEPA
v.
Dennis Grubaugh
(October 16,
1992)
,
AC 92—3,
PCB.)
Therefore,
the respondents’ motion for reconsideration
is
denied. The parties are to abide by the Board’s March 11,
1993
default order.
However,
the Board on its own motion hereby
extends by 30 days the time for payment of the penalty specified
in paragraph one of the Board’s default order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Boaçd, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
_____
day of __________________________,
1993,
by a vote of
5
0.
~
Dorothy
M.,
unn,
Clerk’
Illinois Pj3llution Control Board
O1~.2-
0060