ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 20,
1993
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
EMERGENCY AMENDMENTS TO THE
)
R93-15
OPEN-BURNING RULES,
35 ILL.
)
(Rulemaking)
ADM. CODE 237.121
)
ADOPTED EMERGENCY RULE.
FINAL ORDER.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by C.
A. Manning):
This matter comes before the Board on an August 18,
1993
proposal for emergency rulemaking filed by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (Agency).
The purpose of the
Agency’s proposal is to allow the open burning, without permit,
of certain combustible non—hazardous waste generated in twenty
(20) designated “disaster area” counties which have been impacted
by the recent flooding of the Mississippi River and its
tributaries.
These counties are Adams, Alexander, Calhoun,
Carroll, Greene, Hancock, Henderson, Jackson, Jersey, Jo Daviess,
Madison, Mercer,
Monroe, Pike, Randolph, Rock Island,
Scott,
St.
Clair, Union and Whiteside.
For the reasons stated below, the Board finds, pursuant to
Section 27(c)
of the Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1991 ch.
111
1/2,
par. 1027(c),
5 ILCS 5/27(c) and Section
5—45 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act
(APA)
(Ill.
Rev. Stat.
1991 ch.
127, par. 1005—45,
5 ILCS 100/5—45), that a
“situation exists which reasonably constitutes a threat to the
public interest, safety or welfare”.
The Board today adopts as
an emergency rule new section 237.121 Emergency Exemption for
1993 Flood—Generated Wastes.
This rule will become effective
upon filing with the Secretary of State for
a period of 150 days.
STATUTORY PROVISIONS
Open burning is governed by Section 9(c)
of the Act.
Section 9(c) provides that:
No person shall:
c.
Cause or allow the open burning of
refuse, conduct any salvage operation by
open burning, or cause or allow the
burning of any refuse in any chamber not
specifically designed for the purpose
and approved by the Agency pursuant to
regulations adopted by the Board under
this Act; except that the Board may
2
adopt regulations permitting open
burning of refuse in certain cases upon
a finding that no harm will result from
such burning,
or that any alternative
method of disposing of s~uchrefuse would
create a safety hazard so extreme as to
justify the pollution that would result
from such burning.
The Board’s regulations implementing this section are found
at 35
Ill. Adm. Code Part 327.
Subpart A establishes general
provisions including prohibitions and exemptions and Subpart B
establishes permit requirements.
The Board’s rulemaking requirements in this matter are
contained in the APA and the Act.
Section 5-45 Illinois
Administrative Procedure Act provides in pertinent part:
“Emergency” means the existence of any
situation that any agency finds reasonably
constitutes a threat to the public interest,
safety, or welfare.
If any agency finds that
any emergency exists that requires adoption
of a rule upon fewer days than is required by
Section 5-40 and states in writing its
reasons for that finding, the agency may
adopt an emergency rule without prior notice
or hearing upon filing of notice of emergency
rulemaking with the Secretary of State under
Section 5-70.
.
.
Subject to applicable
constitutional or statutory provisions,
an
emergency rule become effective immediately
upon filing under Section 5—65 or at a stated
date less than 10 days thereafter.
The
Agency shall take reasonable and appropriate
measures to make emergency rules shown to the
persons who may be affected by them.
An emergency rule may be effective for a
period of not longer than 150 days, but the
agency’s authority to adopt an identical rule
under Section 5—40 is not precluded.
Section 27(c)
of the Environmental Protection Act provides:
When the Board finds that a situation exists
which reasonably constitutes
a threat to
public interest, safety or welfare, the Board
may adopt regulations pursuant to and
in
accordance with Section 5.02 of the Illinois
Administrative Procedure Act.
3
Emergency rules are scrutinized by both the Joint Committee
on Administrative Rules and by the courts to determine whether
“there exists a situation which reasonably constitutes a threat
to the public interest, safety or welfare”.
Citizens for a
Better Environment v.
Illinois Pollution Control Board,
(1st
Dist.
1983)
162
Ill. App.3d 105,
504 N.~E. 2d 166,
169.
THE AGENCY’S PROPOSAL
Description of the Emergency
The Agency’s August
18,
1993 four page statement of
justification for its emergency rule proposal states that:
Due to a series of severe thunderstorms and
torrential rains throughout the Mississippi
River Basin, many Illinois counties have
experienced record flood levels that have
adversely impacted and continue to threaten
public health, safety and welfare.
The
flooding has resulted
in extensive damage to
homes,
farms, businesses,
livestock,
roads
and other property.
In an effort to aid
those counties affected by the adverse
weather, the President of the United States
and Governor Edgar have declared numerous
Illinois counties as federal and State
disaster areas.
In a number of Gubernatorial
Proclamations, Governor Edgar has sought to
coordinate the assistance of State agencies
in providing reasonably necessary emergency
measures to assist the flood victims.
T)his
Emergency Rulemaking is being proposed
in order to provide necessary assistance to
persons in various Illinois counties whose
health, welfare and safety have been and
continue to be directly impacted by the
Mississippi River and its tributaries....
Under the current open burning restrictions,
this waste may have to be stored and
stockpiled for many weeks while an
application for a permit is prepared by the
applicant and submitted to and acted upon by
the Agency.
The physical storage of this
waste has and may continue to create a severe
hardship for many flood victims.
Since the
waste products are often in contact and/or
soaked with raw sewage,
the stockpiling of
the waste may also pose a serious public
4
health risk.
The stockpiling of this flood-generated waste
could also critically hinder efforts toward
rebuilding homes and farms and re-
establishing communities.
The expeditious disposal of this flood waste
through the safe buring practices provided in
this proposal will mitigate the risks to
public health,
safety and welfare and the
obstacle to rebuilding and restoration
created by the excessive waste.
(Proposal,
p.
1—2,
3.)
Description of the Proposed Amendments
The Agency describes its proposed amendments as follows:
The current open burning regulations at 35
Ill. Adm. Code 237 allow persons to lawfully
engage in open burning under very specific
conditions;
otherwise,
a person may engage in
open burning only if a permit for such
activity has been issued by the Agency.
The
flooding of the Mississippi River and its
tributaries has resulted in the generation
and accumulation of excessive amounts of
landscape,
agricultural and other combustible
waste.
Under the current rules,
much of this
waste could not be burned until a permit had
been applied for and issued by the Agency.
This Emergency Rulemaking proposal exempts
open burning of flood generated waste from
these permit requirements, while expanding
the provisions for lawful open burning of
agricultural and landscape waste caused by
the flood.
Conditions have been included in
this proposal that are necessary to assure
the protection of public health.
They
include a prohibition from open burning of
potentially dangerous materials such as weed
killers, electrical components, and asbestos
containing materials.
This Emergency
Rulemaking proposal
is applicable to the
counties all along Illinois’ western border,
which have been directly impacted and
threatened by the flooding of the Mississippi
River and
is tributaries.
(Proposal,
p.
2)
5
THE BOARD’S ADOPTED RULES
Consistent with the Governor’s directive to the executive
agencies to coordinate flood relief activities, the Agency
advised the Board of its intent to file, this proposal.
Upon
receipt of the proposal,
on August 18 the Board scheduled this
special emergency meeting.
The staff of the Administrative Code
Unit of the Division of Index,
for its part,
has graciously
agreed to give prior review for format of the copy for filing
with the Secretary of State to avoid paperwork delays.
In prior regulatory proceedings1 the Board has given
exhaustive consideration to the dangers to public health posed by
unmanaged waste, which may become a breeding ground for disease
vectors including mosquitoes,
vermin and birds.
The
decomposition of unmanaged putrescible wastes can lead to
contamination of surface water and groundwater.
The sheer volume
of waste created by the recent flooding which must be relatively
quickly and efficiently handled is unprecedented in the state’s
history and, more specifically in the Board’s 23—year history.
While landfill disposal of all flood-generated wastes may be
possible given extended periods of time and unlimited funds,
this
disposal must be made at the same time that individuals and
governments are struggling to restore essential community
elements and services including drinking water supplies and
sewage treatment systems, housing and medical facilities,
and
highways and bridges.
Under these circumstances, while
controlled burning of certain wastes may have potential adverse
impacts on air quality, any such impacts are outweighed by the
more immediate impacts on surface water and groundwater quality
in the most heavily flood-impacted areas.
Having considered these factors and the information provided
by the Agency, the Board finds that “a situation exists which
reasonably constitutes a threat to the public interest, safety or
welfare”, within the meaning of Section 27(c)
of the Act and
Section 5-45 of the APA.
The Board further finds, as required by Section 9(c)
of the
Act,
that:
“no harm will result from such burning,
or
that any alternative method of disposing of
such refuse would create a safety hazard so
extreme as to justify the pollution that
1
See,
e.g.
In the Matter
of:
Development,
Operating and
Permit
Requirements
for
Non—Hazardous
Waste
Landfills,
R88—7
(Opinion
and
Order
of
March
1,
1990)
and
In
the
Matter
of:
Managing Tire Accumulations to Limit The Spread of the Asian Tiger
Mosquito, R88-12
(Emergency Opinion and Order of April
2,
1988).
6
would result from such burning”.
The Board is aware that today’s rule does not allow
controlled open burning in all disaster counties
(Section
237.121(a)).
While the Agency has not.presented a county-by—
county assessment,
the Board will defer to the Agency’s
assessment of the field conditions
in the affected counties.
Further, the Board agrees with the Agency’s assessment that
combustion of asbestos and chemical—laced wastes
is not in the
best interests of the People of the State even under the current
emergency, disaster conditions.
The Board, as proposed by the Agency, has adopted language
in many of the rules which
is somewhat familiar to the community
which will be using these rules.
Examples of such language
include Section 237.121(b), which duplicates language found in
the permanent exemption found in Section 237.120(a) (6), and
Section 237.121(b), and
(c)(2).
Similarly, the wording of the
conditions found in Section 237.121(e-i)
is taken from language
which has been appearing as standard conditions on Agency—issued
open burning permits since at least 1985.
(See IEPA form APC171,
dated July
1,
1985)..
Finally, the Board observes that today’s emergency rule will
expire within 150 days of its filing the maximum term of any
emergency rule.
The APA prohibits adoption of an emergency rule
“more than once in any 24 month period”
(5 ILCS 100/5—45), so
that any extension of this five month emergency exemption must be
obtained through regular rulemaking or through the Act’.s other
regulatory relief mechanisms.
ORDER
The Board hereby adopts the following emergency rule.
The
Clerk is directed to cause its filing with the Secretary of
.State.
TITLE 35:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SUBTITLE B:
AIR POLLUTION
CHAPTER
I:
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SUBCHAPTER
i:
OPEN BURNING
PART 237
OPEN BURNING
SUBPART A:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section
237.101
Definitions
237.102
Prohibitions
237.103
Explosive Waste
7
237.110
Local Enforcement
237.120
Exemptions
237.121
Emergency Exemptions for 1993 Flood-Generated Waste
EMERGENCY
237.130
Freeport Air Curtain Destructor
SUBPART B:
PERMITS
Section
237.201
Available Permits
237.202
Permit Application
237.203
Permit Conditions
237.204
Standards of Issuance
237.205
Duration and Renewal
237.206
Revision
237.207
Revocation
Appendix A
Rule into Section Table
Appendix B
Section into Rule Table
AUTHORITY:
Implementing Sections 9(c) and 10 and authorized by
Section 27 of the Environmental Protection Act (Ill.
Rev. Stat.
1991,
ch.
111½,
pars.
1009(c), 1010 and 1027
415
ILCS 5/9(c),
5/10 and 5/27).
SOURCE:
Adopted as Rules 401 through 406, R70-1l,
2 PCB 373,
filed and effective September 7,
1971; Renumbered as Chapter
2:
Air Pollution,
Part V:
Open Burning, R72-11,
6 PCB
199, filed
and effective November 10,
1972; amended at 3
Ill. Reg.
51,
p.
117, effective December 7,
1979; amended at 6 Ill.
Reg.
14521,
effective November
8,. 1982; codified at 7 Ill. Reg.
13579;
emergency amendment in R93-15 at 17
Ill. Reg.
_______,
effective
______________________ for a maximum of 150 days.
SUBPART A:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 237.121
Emergency Exemptions for 1993 Flood-Generated
Waste
EMERGENCY
The burning of wooden building debris, landscape and agricultural
wastes,
as defined in this Part, and other combustible waste,
caused by the 1993 Mississippi River flood disaster, without
obtaining a permit from the Agency shall not constitute a
violation of Section 9(c)
of the Act or of this Part,
if
the
following criteria are met:
~
Burning and generation of materials burned occurs only
in the following counties:
fl
Adams
8
21
Alexander:
~j
Calhoun:
iL
Carroll
~
Greene
j).
Hancock
fl
Henderson
.~j,.
Jackson
IL
Jersey
.3&1
Jo Daviess
ill
Madison
)~2J..
Mercer
.~1L
Monroe
iii
Pike
j~J.
Randolph:
,j~j Rock Island
~fl
Scott
j~J.
St. Clair
121
Union: and
IQI
Whiteside.
~j
No other economically reasonable alternative method of
disposal
is available.
~j
Atmospheric conditions will readily dissipate the
contaminants.
~j
In an incorporated area,
notification is provided to
the appropriate fire protection district or fire
department prior to burning.
~L
The burning site
is provided with adequate fire
protection and with such equipment as is necessary to
control the fire and the burning is conducted safely.
9
fi
The burning will not result
in the production of
obnoxious odors or excessive emissions of ~articu1ate
matter so as to cause
a violation of Section 9(a)
of
the Act.
gj
Wind velocity at the time of burning exceeds
5 miles
per hour.
hi
Burning shall not create a visibility hazard on
roadways. railroad tracks or air fields.
j),.
Burning is supervised at all times.
jj
Ashes,
residue, and other by—products of burning are
disposed of
in
a manner consistent with the Act and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
id
Materials burned do not include asbestos containing
products, tires, household appliances,
electrical
components,
carpets, weed killers,
paints,, drain
cleaners, motor oil,
fuel solvents,
or insect poisons.
(Source:
Emergency rule added at 17
Ill. Reg.
_________
effective
_____________________
for
a maximum of 150 days)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. Anderson concurred.
Sections
29 and 41 of the Environmental Protection Act,
415
ILCS 5/41
(1992), provides for appeal of final orders of the
Board within
35 days.
The Rules of the Supreme Court of Illinois
establish filing requirements.
(See also 35 Ill. Adm. Code
101.246, Motions for Reconsideration.)
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify that the a~oveopinion and order was
adopted on the
.~7’-~
day ~of
-~7
,
1993, by a vote
~
Dorothy M.
c~4hn,Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board