ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 5, 1993
LARRY SLATES, LONNIE
)
SEYMOUR, JAMES KLABER,
)
FAYE MOTT, and HOOPESTON
COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL,
)
)
Petitioners,
v.
)
PCB 93—106
(Landfill Siting Review)
ILLINOIS LANDFILLS, INC., and
)
HOOPESTON CITY COUNCIL, on
)
behalf of the CITY OF
)
HOOPESTON,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by J. Theodore Meyer):
This matter is before the Board on petitioners’ motion to
amend their petition, filed July 30, 1993. Respondent Illinois
Landfills, Inc. (ILl) filed a response in opposition to the
motion on August 4, 1993.
Petitioners simply state that they move to amend their
petition for review by filing an amended petition. Petitioners
have not set forth any argument on the issue, nor have they
explained in any way the differences between the original
petition and the amended petition. ILl notes that the amended
petition replaces the term “sole source aquifer” with the term
“non—sole source aquifer”, and adds new paragraphs 21—26. ILl
objects to the amendment of the petition, stating that the new
paragraphs are simply petitioners’ version of hearing testimony,
without cited references, and that amendment of the petition is
not contemplated by the Board’s rules and is not necessary.
Contrary to ILl’s statement, the Board’s procedural rules
allow pleadings to be amended to conform to the proof. (35
Ill.Adm.Code 103.210(a).) It is not necessary to provide
citations to the facts alleged in the new paragraphs, since the
amended petition is not argument, but sets forth the claims made
by petitioners. Those new paragraphs are simply allegations
which must be subsequently supported by petitioners’ brief. We
grant the motion to file the amended petition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
~
day of
~
,
1993, by a vote of ~
~
IC..~
,
Dorothy H. Guryh, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board