ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 20,
1994
IN THE MATTER
OF:
)
)
STAGE II VAPOR RECOVERY IN
)
R93-28
THE METRO-EAST AREA: REPEAL
)
(Rulemaking)
OF 35 ILL.
ADM. 219.586
)
Proposed Rule.
Second Notice.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by R.C.
Flenial):
On October 21,
1993 the
Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency
(Agency)
filed a rulemaking petition in which it
proposes
that the Board repeal the Stage II vapor recovery controls
applicable in the Metro-East area
(Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair
Counties, Illinois).
By today’s action the Board adopts the
repeal proposal for second notice.
The Board’s responsibility in this matter arises from the
Illinois Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
(415 ILCS 5/1 et
seq.).
The Board is charged under the Act to “determine, define
and implement the environmental control standards applicable in
the State of Illinois”
(Act at Section 5(b)).
More generally,
the Board’s rulemaking charge is based on the system of checks
and balances integral to Illinois environmental governance: the
Board bears responsibility for the rulemaking and principal
adjudicatory functions, whereas the Agency is responsible for
carrying out the principal administrative duties.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 4,
1993 the Board adopted the repeal proposal
for first notice.
Publication occurred at 17 Ill. Reg.
20203,
November 29,
1993.
Hearing was held on December 7,
1993 in Collinsville,
Illinois.
Testimony was presented by representatives of the
Agency, the Illinois Petroleum Marketers Association
(IPMA), the
Illinois Association of Convenience Stores,
Piasa Motor Fuels,
Inc.
(Piasa), Clinton County Oil Company,
Inc.,
and the Illinois
Petroleum Council.
The 45-day first-notice comment period closed on January 14,
1994.
Comments were filed by the Department of Commerce and
Community Affairs
(DCCA)
(PC #1), IPMA
(PC #2), Administrative
Code Division
(PC #3)
and the Agency
(PC #4).
Administrative
Code Division recommended one non—substantive change which the
Board accepts.
DCCA has determined that the proposed rule will
not “significantly impact small businesses”.
(PC #1.)
—2—
Repeal of the Stage II regulations is predicated upon
adoption by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA)
of rules that govern on-board vapor recovery
(OBVR)
systems
(see discussion following).
The OBVR rules are scheduled
for signing on January 22,
1994.
(PC #4 at ¶2.)
The Board
believes that it is in the public interest that Illinois respond
to adoption of the OBVR rules expeditiously.
Pursuant thereto,
the Board today adopts repeal of the Stage II controls for second
notice.
RATIONALE
Stage II vapor recovery systems are designed to control and
capture hydrocarbon vapors during the fueling of motor vehicle
tanks.
Vehicle fuel emissions consist of gasoline vapors
displaced from the vehicle tank by dispensed liquid gasoline as
the tank is filled.
The Stage II system captures these vapors as
they exit the vehicle’s fuel fillpipe, thereby preventing escape
of the vapors into the atmosphere.
Vapor capture is accomplished
by one of several types of devices attached to or part of the
nozzle of the fuel dispensing system.
The Stage II regulations at issue occur at 35
Ill.
Adm. Code
219.586.
They were adopted by the Board
in August 19921 in
response to requirements of both the federal Clean Air Act and
the Illinois Environmental Protection Act.
In particular,
the
Clean Air Act requires that areas classified as “moderate ozone
nonattainment areas” have Stage II regulations in place and
submitted for approval to the USEPA by November 15,
1992.
(42
USC 7511a(b)(3).)
The Metro—East area is classified by the
USEPA
as a moderate ozone rionattainment area.
The Clean Air Act, however, does provide for
a circumstance
under which Stage II regulations are ~
required in moderate
ozone nonattainment areas.
That circumstance is that the USEPA
promulgate regulations for OBVR2.
The Clean Air Act specifies that USEPA was to promulgate the
OBVR regulations by November 15,
1991.
However,
tJSEPA had still
not promulgated the OBVR regulations by November 15,
1992, the
date on which the Clean Air Act required the State to implement
1
In the Matter of:
Stage II Gasoline Vapor Recovery Rules:
Amendments to 35
Ill.
Adm. Code Parts
215,
218 and 219, R91-30,
August 13,
1992.
In addition to the Metro-East Stage II
regulations,
Stage
II regulations for the Chicago ozone
nonattainment area were also adopted in R91—30.
The Chicago area
regulations are not at issue today.
The effective date of the
R91—30 regulations was August 24,
1992.
2
OBVR systems accomplish vapor recovery through devices
built into the vehicle rather than into the fuel pump.
—3—
Stage II in the absence of OBVR regulations.
The nexus between
the Stage II regulations required as of November 15,
1992 and the
USEPA’s action on the OBVR regulations has also been recognized
by the state legislature in its directive to the Board to address
Stage II:
The Board shall adopt regulations requiring the owner
or operator of a gasoline dispensing system that
dispenses more than 10,000 gallons of gasoline per
month to install and operate a system for the recovery
of gasoline vapor emissions arising from the fueling of
motor vehicles that meets the requirements of Section
182 of the federal Clean Air Act
(42 USC 7511a).
These
regulations shall apply only in areas of the State that
are classified as moderate, serious, severe or extreme
nonattainment areas for ozone pursuant to Section 181
of the federal Clean Air Act
(42 USC 7511),
but shall
not ap~lvto areas classified as moderate nonattainment
areas for ozone if the Administrator of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency ~romu1~ates standards
for vehicle—based (onboard~systems for the control of
vehicle refueling emissions pursuant to Section
202(a) (6)
of the federal Clean Air Act
(42 USC
7521(a) (6) by November 15,
1992.
(415 ILCS 5/10,
emphasis added)
Now, however,
it appears that federal promulgation of OBVR
regulations will in fact occur.
The National Resources Defense
Council
(NRDC)
and others have successfully brought suit against
USEPA for failure to promulgate the OBVR regulations.
(NRDC v.
Reilly, No.
92—1137, D.C.
Cir. Jan. 22,
1993.)
The court has
found that USEPA did not have the discretion to forego
promulgation of the OBVR regulations, and accordingly ordered
USEPA to proceed with the regulations.
Additionally,
a consent
decree has been entered that requires that USEPA promulgate the
OBVR regulations by January 22,
1994.
(See Exh.
1.)
In recognition of these OBVR developments, the Agency on May
3,
1993 filed a motion with the Board requesting that the Board
adopt an emergency rule that would extend the deadline upon which
affected facilities in the Metro—East area were required under
Section 219.586 to come into compliance with the Stage II
requirements.
By order of May 20,
1993 the Board granted the
Agency’s motion and adopted an emergency rule,
the net effect of
which was to temporarily move out the compliance date to October
15,
1993.
That date is now past,
and, absent further regulatory
amendment, the affected facilities are again required to be in
compliance with Stage II requirements.
It is the Agency’s observation that absent repeal of the
Stage II rules
—4—
•.. the specter is raised of a very large capital
outlay in an economically depressed area of the State
to satisfy a Clean Air Act requirement for only
a very
short period of time.
Specifically, the Agency
estimated that the capital outlay for installation of
Stage II at the 400 area station would be approximately
$14 million.
In January when the
OBVR
rules are
promulgated, there is no longer a federal requirement
for Stage II systems to be in place.
(Agency
Statement of Reasons at p.2)
COSTS
In the interest of assuring a full record in this matter,
the Board asked the Agency and interested persons to present the
following particular information:
(1) the number of facilities
that have already installed some Stage II equipment,
including
those who may have done installation in conjunction with
installing new tanks;
(2) the remaining equipment or
modifications necessary to operate Stage II vapor recovery
in
accordance with the in—place rule; and
(3) cost estimates to
complete installation that has begun,
and estimated costs to
operate a Stage II program in accordance with the in-place rule.
Information presented at hearing included some answers to
these questions.
The Agency witness testified that under the
current regulations,
377 facilities would be subject to the
current Stage II control requirements in the Metro-East area
absent the repeal as follows:
Madison County
-
188
Monroe County
—
19
St.
Clair County
—
170
(Tr. at 13)
Additionally, the Agency provided other documentation that
includes costs estimates for Stage II vapor recovery
requirements.
Using the cost information presented, the Agency
calculates Metro—East area figures as follows
(Tr.
at 13):
Throughput
Number of
Capital Cost
Total Cost
(gal. /inonth)
Facilities
Per Facility
By Size
10,000
—
24,999
62
$
9,760
$
605,120
25,000
—
49,999
97
27,480
1,695,560
50,000
—
99,999
133
24,120
3,207,960
100,000 or more
36,710
3,120,990
Totals
377
$8,361,990
—5—
Piasa presents the following cost estimate to install Stage
II vapor recovery at an existing location:
COST ESTIMATE TO INSTALL STAGE II VAPOR RECOVERY
AT AN EXISTING LOCATION
4—6 Hose MPD
6—6 Hose MPD
24 Hoses
36 Hoses
Nozzles, hoses, etc.
OPW Nozzle $155
Dayco Hose
105
Whip Hose
44
Breakaway
~
$400
$
9,600
$14,400
Labor to Retrofit Dispenses
4,000
6,000
Underground Piping
-
Materials
labor, excavation,
paving
20,000
25,000
Vacuum Assist Kits $3480/each
13,920
20,880
$47,520
$66,280
Annual maintenance cost,
for hoses, nozzles, and bellows is
$l50—$200 per hose plus labor
(Estimates prepared by Piasa Motor Fuels with help from
Superior Equipment)
(Exh.
3.)
Piasa states that estimating costs for retrofitting Stage II
is difficult for a “typical” location, because every location and
situation is different.
(Id.)
No facilities to date have registered Stage II systems with
the Agency or have applied for any associated construction and
operating permits.
Ten to 15 percent of the area retail stations
have probably installed the underground vapor recovery lines
during station upgrades
in the past few years.
(Tr. at 17.)
The
Agency estimates that the average cost to install Stage II vapor
recovery at a “typical” service station is approximately
$40,000.00.
For the effected facilities in the Metro—East area,
the Agency estimates $8,000,000.00 in capital costs for all
facilities, and an ongoing annual operational cost of $7,000 per
station.
(u.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As a final matter, the Board observed at first notice that
the Act at Section 10 specifies that Stage II
“...
regulations
shall not apply
...
if
USEPA)
...
promulgates OBVR
—6—
standards
...
by November 15,
1992”
(see full quotation above).
In light of this language, the Board at first notice asked
interested persons to comment on whether USEPA’s failure to
promulgate
OBVR
regulations by November 15, 1992 constitutes an
impediment to the Board’s moving forward with repeal of the
Metro—East Stage II regulations.
At hearing, the Agency observed that in promulgating the
Stage II regulations in 1992 the State was acting in accord with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act.
The Agency further
observes that in now proposing to repeal Stage II in the Metro-
East moderate nonattainment area the State would be continuing to
act not only in accord with the Clean Air Act, but also the
Court’s order and the consent decree in NRDC v. Reilly and the
clear legislative intent of implementing Stage II only if OBVR
regulations were not in place.
(Pr. at 37.)
(See also PC #4 at
¶1.)
Other participants at hearing agreed that the timeframes in
the state legislation were intended to be consistent with the
federal requirements.
(Tr. at 35,
36,
20.)
IPMA also stated
that it believes that the current language in the statute is not
an impediment to the current action to repeal the Stage II
requirements
(Tr. at 35.)
IPMA
further states that the
legislative history of SB 1241
(see full quotation of 415 ILCS
5/10,
above) which changed the requirements for Stage II vapor
recovery was intended to bring the State into conformance with,
but to be no more stringent than the requirements of the federal
CAA.
(PC #2 at 9.)
Based on the information in the record, the Board believes
that it is prudent to move forward with the repeal of the Stage
II vapor recovery rules for moderate nonattainment areas in
Illinois.
The rules requiring Stage II vapor recovery in
moderate nonattainment areas appear to no longer be economically
reasonable.
There
is further no indication in the record that
the VOM reductions accomplished through use of Stage II are
necessary to meet
CAA
objectives in addition to
OBVR.
As the
Agency has observed:
These Stage II systems would provide redundant control
when onboard canisters are present, and would provide
little additional vapor recovery at great cost.
(Tr.
at 14.)
ORDER
The Board hereby adopts for second notice the following
amendments to 35
Ill.
Adin.
Code 219 effectuating the repeal of
Section 219.586.
The Clerk of the Board is directed to submit
this proposal with the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules.
TITLE 35:
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
SUBTITLE B:
AIR POLLUTION
—7—
CHAPTER I:
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SUBCHAPTER
c:
EMISSIONS STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS
FOR STATIONARY SOURCES
PART 219
ORGANIC MATERIAL EMISSION STANDARDS
AND
LIMITATIONS
FOR THE METRO EAST AREA
SUBPART A:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section
219.100
219.101
219.102
219.103
219.104
219.105
219.106
219.107
219.108
219. 109
219.110
219.111
219. 112
219.113
Introduction
Savings Clause
Abbreviations and Conversion Factors
Applicability
Definitions
Test Methods and Procedures
Compliance Dates
Operation of Afterburners
Exemptions, Variations, and Alternative Means of
Control or Compliance Determinations
Vapor Pressure of Volatile Organic Liquids
Vapor Pressure of Organic Material or Solvent
Vapor Pressure of Volatile Organic Material
Incorporations by Reference
Monitoring for Negligibly-Reactive Compounds
Separation Operations
Pumps and Compressors
Vapor Blowdown
Safety Relief Valves
SUBPART B:
ORGANIC EMISSIONS FROM STORAGE
AND
LOADING OPERATIONS
Section
219.121
Storage Containers
219.122
Loading Operations
219.123
Petroleum Liquid Storage Tanks
219.124
External Floating Roofs
219.125
Compliance Dates
(Repealed)
219.126
Compliance Plan
(Repealed)
SUBPART C:
ORGANIC EMISSIONS FROM MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
Section
219.141
219.142
219.143
219.144
Section
219. 181
219. 182
219.183
219. 184
219.185
SUBPART E:
SOLVENT CLEANING
Solvent Cleaning in General
Cold Cleaning
Open Top Vapor Degreasing
Conveyorized Degreasing
Compliance Schedule (Repealed)
—8—
Emission Limitations
Daily-Weighted
Average
Limitations
Solids
Basis
Calculation
Alternative
Emission
Limitations
Exemptions
From
Emission Limitations
Exemption
From
General
Rule
on
Use
of
Organic
Material
Compliance
Schedule
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
SUBPART G:
USE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL
Use of Organic Material
Alternative Standard
Fuel Combustion Emission Units
Operations with Compliance Program
SUBPART H:
PRINTING
AND
PUBLISHING
Flexographic
and
Rotogravure
Printing
Applicability
Compliance
Schedule
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Heatset-Web-Offset Lithographic Printing
SUBPART
Q:
LEAKS FROM SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CHEMICAL AND POLYMER
MANUFACTURING
PLANT
General
Requirements
Inspection
Program
Plan
for
Leaks
Inspection Program for Leaks
Repairing Leaks
Recordkeeping for Leaks
Report for Leaks
Alternative Program for Leaks
Open-Ended
Valves
Standards
for
Control
Devices
Compliance Date
(Repealed)
SUBPART R:
PETROLEUM REFINING AND RELATED INDUSTRIES;
ASPHALT MATERIALS
Section
219.441
Petroleum
Refinery
Waste
Gas
Disposal
219.442
Vacuum
Producing
Systems
219.443
Wastewater
(Oil/Water)
Separator
219.186
Test
Methods
SUBPART F:
COATING OPERATIONS
Section
219.204
219.205
219.206
219.2 07
219.
2 08
219.209
219.2 10
219
.
211
Section
219.301
2 19.302
219.303
219.304
Section
219.401
219.402
219.403
219.404
219.405
Section
219.421
219.422
219.423
219.424
219.425
219.426
219.427
219.428
219.429
219.430
—9—
219.444
Process
Unit
Turnarounds
219.445
Leaks:
General
Requirements
219.446
Monitoring
Program
Plan
for
Leaks
219.447
Monitoring
Program
for
Leaks
219.448
Recordkeeping
for
Leaks
219.449
Reporting
for
Leaks
219.450
Alternative
Program
for
Leaks
219.451
Sealing
Device
Requirements
219.452
Compliance
Schedule
for
Leaks
219.453
Compliance
Dates
(Repealed)
SUBPART
S:
RUBBER
AND
MISCELLANEOUS
PLASTIC
PRODUCTS
Section
219.461
Manufacture
of
Pneumatic Rubber Tires
219.462
Green
Tire
Spraying
Operations
219.463
Alternative
Emission
Reduction
Systems
219.464
Emission Testing
219.465
Compliance Dates
(Repealed)
219.466
Compliance Plan (Repealed)
SUBPART T:
PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING
Section
219.480
Applicability
219.481
Control of Reactors, Distillation Units, Crystallizers,
Centrifuges
and
Vacuum
Dryers
219.482
Control
of
Air
Dryers,
Production
Equipment
Exhaust
Systems and Filters
219.483
Material Storage and Transfer
219.484
In—Process Tanks
219.485
Leaks
219.486
Other Emission Units
219.487
Testing
219.488
Monitoring
for Air Pollution Control Equipment
219.489
Recordkeeping for Air Pollution Control Equipment
SUBPART V:
AIR OXIDATION PROCESSES
Section
219.521
Definitions
(Repealed)
219.525
Emission
Limitations
for
Air
Oxidation
Processes
219.526
Testing
and
Monitoring
219.527
Compliance
Date
(Repealed)
SUBPART
W:
AGRICULTURE
Section
219.541
Pesticide Exception
SUBPART X:
CONSTRUCTION
Section
—10—
219.561
2 19.562
219.563
Section
219.581
219.582
219.583
219.
584
219.585
219.586
Architectural
Coatings
Paving
Operations
Cutback
Asphalt
SUBPART Y:
GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION
Bulk
Gasoline
Plants
Bulk Gasoline Terminals
Gasoline
Dispensing
Facilities
-
Storage
Tank
Filling
Operations
Gasoline
Delivery
Vessels
Gasoline
Volatility
Standards
Gasoline
Dispensing
Operations
-
Motor
Vehicle
Fueling
Operations (Repealed)
SUBPART
Z:
DRY CLEANERS
Section
219.601
219.602
219.603
219.604
219.605
219.606
219.607
219.608
219.609
219.610
219.611
219.612
219.613
Perchloroethylene
Dry
Cleaners
Exemptions
Leaks
Compliance
Dates
Repealed
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
Exception
to
Compliance Plan
(Repealed)
Standards
for
Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners
Operating
Practices
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Dry
Program
for
Inspection
and
Repair
of Leaks
Testing
and
Monitoring
Exemption
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Dry
Cleaners
Compliance
Dates
(Repealed)
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
Cleaners
SUBPART
AA:
PAINT AND INK
MANUFACTURING
Section
219.620
219.621
219.623
219.624
219.625
219.626
219.628
219.630
219.636
219.637
Section
219
.
640
219.642
219.644
Applicability
Exemption
for
Waterbase
Material
and
Heatset-Offset
Ink
Permit Conditions
Open-iop Mills, Tanks, Vats or Vessels
Grinding
Mills
Storage Tanks
Leaks
Clean
Up
Compliance
Schedule
Recordkeeping and Reporting
SUBPART
BB:
POLYSTYRENE
PLANTS
Applicability
Emissions
Limitation
at
Polystyrene
Plants
Emissions
Testing
—11—
219.875
219.877
219.879
219.881
219.883
219.886
Section
219.920
219.923
219.926
219.927
219.928
Applicability
of
Subpart
BB
(Renumbered)
Emissions
Limitation
at
Polystyrene
Plants(Renumbered)
Compliance
Date
(Repealed)
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
Special
Requirements
for
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
Emissions Testing (Renumbered)
SUBPART
PP:
MISCELLANEOUS FABRICATED PRODUCT
MANUFACTURING
PROCESSES
Applicability
Permit
Conditions
Control Requirements
Compliance
Schedule
Testing
SUBPART
QQ:
MISCELLANEOUS FORMULATION MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Section
219 .940
219
.
943
219.946
219.947
219.948
Section
219.960
219.963
219.966
219.967
219.968
Section
219.980
219.983
219.986
219.987
219.988
Applicability
Permit
Conditions
Control Requirements
Compliance Schedule
Testing
SUBPART PR:
MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC CHEMICAL
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Applicability
Permit
Conditions
Control
Requirements
Compliance Schedule
Testing
SUBPART TT:
OTHER EMISSION
UNITS
Applicability
Permit Conditions
Control
Requirements
Compliance Schedule
Testing
SUBPART UU:
RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
Exempt
Emission
Units
Subject
Emission
Units
Section
219.990
219. 991
—12—
Section 219.Appendix A:
List of Chemicals Defining Synthetic
Organic
Chemical
and
Polymer
Manufacturing
Section
2l9.Appendix
B:
VOM
Measurement
Techniques
for
Capture
Efficiency
Section
219.Appendix
C:
Reference
Test
Methods
For
Air
Oxidation
Processes
Section
219.Appendix
D:
Coefficients
for
the
Total
Resource
Effectiveness Index
(TRE) Equation
AUTHORITY:
Implementing Section 10 and authorized by Section
28.5 of the Environmental Protection Act
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1991,
ch.
111½, par.
1010)
(P.A.
87—1213,
effective
September
26,
1992)
415
ILCS
5/10
and
28.5.
SOURCE:
Adopted
at
R91-8
at
15
Ill.
Reg.
12491,
effective
August
16,
1991;
amended
in
R91—24
at
16
Ill.
Reg.
13597,
effective
August
24,
1992;
amended
in
R91—30
at
16
Ill.
Reg.
13883,
effective
August
24,
1992;
emergency amendment in R93-12 at Ill.
Reg.
8295,
effective
May
24,
1993,
for
a
maximum
of
150
days,
amended
in
R93—9
at
17
Ill.
Peg.
16918,
effective September 27,
1993
and
October
21,
1993;
amended
in
P93—28
at
18
Ill.
Req.
___________
effective
__________________________
SUBPART
Y:
GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION
Section
219.586
Gasoline Dispensing Operations
-
Motor
Vehicle Fueling Operations
(Repealed)
a)
For the purposes of this Section, the following
definitions apply.
1)
Average monthly volume means the amount of motor
vehicle
fuel
dispensed
per
month from a gasoline
dispensing
operation
based
upon
a
monthly average
for
the
2-year
period
of
November,
1990
through
October,
1992
or,
if
not
available,
the
monthly
average
for
the
most
recent
twelve
calendar
months.
Monthly averages are to include only
those
months when the operation was operating.
2)
Certified
means
any
vapor
collection and control
system
which
has
been
tested
and
approved by CARB
as
having
a
vapor
recovery
and
removal
efficiency
of
at
least
95
(by
weight)
shall
constitute a
certified
vapor
collection and control system.
CARB
testing
and
approval
is
pursuant
to
the
CARB
manual,
incorporated by reference at 219.112
of
this
Part.
3)
Completion
of
installation means the successful
passing
of
one
or
more of the following tests
applicable
to
the
installed vapor collection and
—13—
control
system:
Dynamic
Backpressure
Test,
Pressure
Decay/Leak
Test,
and
Liquid
Blockage
Test,
incorporated
by
reference
at
219.112
of
this
Part.
4)
Constructed means fabricated,
erected or
installed;
refers
to
any
facility,
emission
source
or
air
pollution
control
equipment.
5)
CARB
means
California
Air
Resources
Board,
P.O.
Box
2815,
Sacramento,
CA
95812.
6)
Employee means any person who performs work for an
employer.
7)
Operation means any building,
structure,
installation,
operation
or combination thereof
located
on
contiguous
properties and under common
ownership
that
provides
for
the
dispensing of
motor
vehicle
fuel.
8)
Gasoline dispensing operation means any operation
where
motor
vehicle
fuel
is dispensed into motor
vehicle fuel tanks or portable containers from a
storage
tank
with
a
capacity
of 2176 liters
(575
gallons) or more.
9)
Modification means any change, removal or
addition,
other
than an identical replacement,
of
any component contained within the vapor
collection and control system.
10)
Motor
vehicle
means
any self-propelled vehicle
powered
by
an
internal
combustion
engine
including,
but
not
limited
to,
automobiles
and
trucks.
Specifically excluded from this
definition are watercraft and aircraft.
11)
Motor vehicle fuel means any petroleum distillate
having
a
Reid
vapor
pressure
of
more
than
27.6
kilopascals
(kPa)
(four
pounds
per
square
inch)
and which is used to power motor vehicles.
12)
Owner or operator means any person who owns,
leases, operates, manages, supervises or controls
(directly or indirectly)
a gasoline dispensing
operation.
13)
Reid
vapor
pressure
for
gasoline, shall be
measured
in
accordance with either the method ASTM
D323
or
a
modification of ASTM D323 known as the
“dry
method”
as
set
forth
in
40
CFR
80,
Appendix
—14—
E, incorporated by references
in 35
Ill. Adm.
Code
219.112
of
this
Part.
14)
Vapor
collection
and
control
system
means
any
system
certified
by
CARB
which
limits
the
discharge
to
the
atmosphere
of
motor
vehicle
fuel
vapors
displaced
during
the
dispensing
of
motor
vehicle
fuel
into
motor
vehicle
fuel
tanks.
b)
The
provisions
of
subsection
(c)
below
shall
apply
to
any
gasoline
dispensing
operation
which
dispenses
an
average
monthly
volume
of
more
than
10,000
gallons
of
motor
vehicle
fuel
per
month.
Compliance shall be
demonstrated
in
accordance
with
the
schedule
provided
in
subsection
(d)
below.
c)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
gasoline
dispensing
operation
subject
to
the
requirements
of
subsection
(b)
above
shall
cause
or
allow
the
dispensing
of
motor
vehicle
fuel
at
any
time
from
a
motor
fuel
dispenser
unless
the
dispenser
is
equipped
with
and
utilizes
a
vapor collection and control system which is properly
installed and operated as provided below:
1)
Any vapor collection and control system installed,
used or maintained has been CARB certified.
2)
Any
vapor
collection
and
control
system
utilized
is
maintained
in
accordance with the
manufacturer’s
specifications
and
the
certification.
3)
No elements or components of a vapor collection
and control system are modified,
removed, replaced
or otherwise rendered inoperative in a manner
which
prevents
the system from performing in
accordance
with
its
certification
and
design
specifications.
4)
A
vapor
collection
and
control
system
has
no
defective, malfunctioning or missing components.
5)
Operators and employees of the gasoline dispensing
operation
are
trained
and instructed in the proper
operation
and
maintenance of a vapor collection
and
control
system.
6)
Instructions are posted in a conspicuous and
visible
place
within
the motor fuel dispensing
area
and
describe
the
proper
method
of
dispensing
motor
vehicle
fuel
with
the
use
of
the
vapor
collection
and
control
system.
—15—
d)
In
conjunction
with
the
compliance
provisions
of
Section
219.105
of
this
Part,
operations
subject
to
the
requirements
of
subsection
(c)
above
shall
demonstrate
compliance
according
to
the
following:
1)
Operations
that
commenced
construction
after
November
1,
1990,
must
comply
by
May
1,
1993.
BOARD
NOTE:
The
Board
adopted
an
emergency
rule
in
R93-12,
extending
the
compliance
date
in
Section
219.586(d)
(1) from
May
1,
1993
to
October
15,
1993.
This
emergency
rule
became
effective
on
May
24,
1993
and
will
expire
on
October
21,
1993.
2)
Operations
that
commenced
construction
before
November
1,
1990,
and
dispense
an
average
monthly
volume
of
more
than
100,000
gallons
of
motor
fuel
per
month
must
comply by November
1,
1993.
3)
Operations
that
commenced
construction
before
November
1,
1990,
and
dispense
an
average
monthly
volume of less than
100,000
gallons
of
motor
fuel
per month must comply by November
1,
1994.
4)
New operations constructed after the adoption of
this
Section
shall
comply
with
the
requirements
of
subsection
(c)
above
upon
startup
of
the
operation.
5)
Existing operations previously exempted from but
which become subject to the requirements of
subsection
(c)
above after May
1,
1993 shall
comply with the requirements of subsection
(c)
above within six calendar months of the date from
which
the
operation
becomes
subject.
e)
Any
gasoline
dispensing operation that becomes subject
to
the
provisions of subsection
(c) above at any time
shall
remain
subject
to
the
provisions
of
subsection
(c)
above
at
all
times.
f)
Upon
request
by
the
Agency,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
gasoline
dispensing
operation
which
claims
to
be
exempt
from
the
requirements of this Section shall submit
records
to
the
Agency
within
30
calendar
days
from
the
date
of
the
request
which
demonstrate
that
the
gasoline
dispensing
operation
is
in
fact
exempt.
g)
Recordkeeping and reporting:
1)
Any
gasoline
dispensing
operation
subject
to
subsection
(c)
above
shall
retain at the operation
—16—
copies
of
the
registration
information
required
at
subsection
(h)
below.
2)
Records
and
reports
required
pursuant
to
this
subsection
shall
be
made
available
to
the
Agency
upon
request.
Records
and
reports
which
shall
be
maintained
by
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
gasoline
dispensing
operation
shall
clearly
demonstrate:
A)
That
a
certified
vapor
collection
and
control
system
has
been
installed
and
tested
to
verify
its
performance according to its
specifications.
B)
That proper maintenance has been conducted
in
accordance with the manufacturer’s
specifications and requirements.
C)
The time period and duration of all
malfunctions of the vapor collection and
control system.
D)
The motor vehicle fuel throughput of the
operation
for
each
calendar
month
of
the
previous year.
E)
That operators and employees are trained and
instructed in the proper operation and
maintenance of the vapor collection and
control system and informed as to the
potential penalties associated with the
violation of any provision of this Section.
h)
Any gasoline dispensing operation subject to subsection
(c)
above shall be exempt from the permit requirements
specified under 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 201.142,
201.143 and
201.144 for its vapor collection and control systems,
provided that:
1)
Upon the installation of a vapor collection and
control system, the owner or operator of the
gasoline dispensing operation submits to the
Agency a registration which provides at minimum
the operation name and address, signature of the
owner or operator, the CARB Executive Order Number
for the vapor collection and control system to be
utilized, the number of nozzles
(excluding diesel
or kerosene) used for motor vehicle refueling, the
monthly average volume of motor vehicle fuel
dispensed, the location (including contact
person’s name,
address, and telephone number)
of
records and reports required by this Section,
and
—17—
the
date
of
completion
of
installation
of
the
vapor
collection
and
control
system.
2)
The registration is submitted to the Agency within
30
days
of
completion
of
such
installation.
3)
A copy of the registration information is
maintained at the gasoline dispensing operation.
4)
Upon the modification of an existing vapor
collection
and
control
system,
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
gasoline
dispensing
operation
submits
to
the
Agency
a
registration
that
details
the
changes
to
the
information provided in the
previous
registration
of
the
vapor
collection
and
control
system
and
which includes the signature of
the
owner
or
operator.
The
registration
must be
submitted to the Agency within 30 days of
completion of such modification.
(Source:
Repealed at 18
Ill. Peg.
___________,
effective
_____________________________________________________________________
)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Board Member J. Theodore Meyer concurred.
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above opinion and order was
adopted on the
________
day of
____________________,
1994, by
avoteof
Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
L—20—94
01:lOp
ree:
1,319,936
Current
ARNYCORP. FIN
ESCAST4
.STA
REPEALII.
2ND
SOCAL2
.STA
Dir
..
Parent
38,880
01—20—94
09:16a
AUTOSRD9.STA
2,976
01—19—94
01:OOp
HACO
45,479
01—20—94
01:lOp
PHONE
.DIS
3,013
01—20—94
01:04p
1
Directory
A:\*.*
Dir
3,241 01—20—94 Ol:Olp
33,682
01—20—94
Ol:O4p
9,392
01—20—94
lO:06a
—17—
the
date
of
completion
of
installation
of
the
vapor
collection
and
control
system.
2)
The
registration
is
submitted
to
the
Agency
within
30
days
of
completion
of
such
installation.
3)
A
copy
of
the
registration
information
is
maintained
at
the
gasoline
dispensing operation.
4)
Upon
the
modification of an existing vapor
collection
and
control
system,
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
gasoline
dispensing
operation
submits
to
the
Agency
a
registration
that
details
the
changes
to
the
information
provided
in
the
previous registration of the vapor collection and
control
system
and
which
includes
the
signature
of
the
owner
or
operator.
The
registration
must
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
within
30
days
of
completion
of
such
modification.
(Source:
Repealed
at
18
Ill.
Reg.
__________,
effective
_____________________________________________________________________
)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Board Member 3. Theodore Meyer concurred.
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the abov,e—ppinion and order was
adopted on the
~?~Q-
day of
a vote of
•7—~
1994,
by
Ill
Control Board