ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January
6,
1994
WILNER BROCKNAN,
JR.
and
)
FIRST MIDWEST
BANK
OF JOLIET
)
AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NO. 757,
)
)
Petitioners,
)
v.
)
PCB 93—162
)
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION ~AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE
BOARD
(by G.
T. Girard):
This matter is before the Board on a number of filings in
the proceeding which include a December 17,
1993, motion to
supplement the Agency record in this proceeding filed by
petitioners.
On December 27,
1993, the Board received a filing
from the Agency objecting to the motion to supplement.
The
Agency’s filing indicated that it had been timely mailed pursuant
to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.102.
On December 22,
1993, the Board
received a motion for leave to file an amicus brief,
filed by
Residents Against a Polluted Environment.
On December 27,
1993,
petitioner filed a motion in opposition to leave to file an
amicus brief.
Further, on January 4,
1994, the Board received
a
motion to strike petitioner’s brief filed by the Agency.
The Board will first address the issue of supplementing the
record.
The petitioner asks that the Board supplement the record
with a document which petitioner. asserts is “referenced on page
85 of Book I of the Administrative Record as ‘LPC—PA15 facility
data sheets’
“.
The petitioner argues that the document is
“material to understanding references already existing in the
record”.
The Agency objects to supplementing the record with
this document arguing that it is a “selected transcription of
some information supplied by the LPC-PA15 form.”
The Agency
further states that the LPC-PA15 form is in the record on appeal
at pages 174-176 of Book
1.
An exaininationof the record
indicates that the LPC-PA15 form is included in the record at
pages 174-175.
The two pages offered as joint exhibit 18 appear
to be a compilation of the data already included in the LPC-PA15
form.
Therefore,
the Board will deny the motion to supplement as
the information being offered is already included in the record.
The Board will next discuss the issue of allowing the leave
to file the amicus.
The Board’s past practice has been to allow
participants at the local
level in landfill siting cases to
participate before the Board only as amici.
(Clean Oualitv
Resources,
Inc.
v. Marion County Board, PCB 90—216,
—
PCB
,
(February 28,
1991); Laidlaw Waste Systems v. McHenrv CountY
2
Board,
90 PCB 135
(PCB 88—27, June 16,
1988); Waste Haulinci.
Inc.
V.
Macon County Board, 129 PCB 321
(PCB 91-223, January 23,
1992).)
Further, the Board has allowed the filing of an amicus
brief
in a permit appeal case.
In CWM Chemical Services. Inc.
v.
IEPA, PCB 89—177,
116 PCB 19, November 8, 1990, the Board allowed
the 35th District Environmental Task Force to participate as an
amicus.
Therefore, the Board will grant leave to file the amicus
brief.
The Board does note however that although the Residents
Against
a Polluted Environment did attend the hearing below,
the
representatives declined to make a statement which would be
subject to cross—examination.
The Board will grant the petitioner an opportunity to reply
to the amicus brief.
Such reply must be received by the Board no
later than January 11,
1994.
Lastly, the Board notes that the motion to strike the
petitioner’s brief is not ripe.
Therefore, the Board will
reserve ruling on that motion and take it with the case.
The
Board notes that the Agency’s brief accompanied the motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, ~xeby
certify that th
above order was adopted on the
_________________
day of
___________________,
1994,
by a vote
of
_______
Illinois
Control Board