ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February
    7,
    1980
    SAFETY~KLEENCORPORATION,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB
    80~l2
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Dr. Satchell):
    This matter comes before the Board upon a variance petition
    filed January 17,
    1980 by Safety~KleenCorporation (Safety~
    Kleen)
    The Petitioner requests a variance from the requirements
    of Chapter
    9:
    Special
    Waste Hauling Regulations, or in the alter~
    native
    a finding that Chapter
    9 is inapplicable to its spent
    solvent collection and regeneration operations.
    Safety—Kleen
    leases solvent washing equipment to customers throughout the state.
    Its customers are mostly engaged in automotive repair
    and
    industri~
    al maintenance.
    The equipment appears to typically consist of
    a
    covered sink,
    solvent puma,
    nozzle and return drain.
    The equip~
    ment
    is
    leased for a periodic charge which includes regularly
    scheduled maintenance and solvent changes,
    Safety~Kleenalso
    provides solvent leasing service to persons who own equipment
    manufactured by
    others.
    About 97
    of
    the
    solvent handled by Safety~Kleenis mineral
    spirit, which the Merck Index defines as
    a flammable petroleum
    fraction boiling in the range of 80°to 145°
    C.
    The remainder
    is
    a mixture of halogenated hydrocarbons with a water phase
    solvent.
    The spent solvents are transported in closed drums by
    route trucks
    to storage tanks
    at the sales branch offices,
    Tanker trucks periodically transport spent solvent from the sales
    branches to one of Safety~Kleen~sregional solvent regeneration
    facilities,
    one of which is in Elgin, Illinois,
    The spent solvent
    is distilled after emulsions and sediment are removed,
    Products
    which are not reused as solvent or sold are disposed of at ap~
    proved disposal sites,
    This
    is done utilizing the special waste
    manifest procedures of Chapter
    9,
    Safety—Kleen requests
    a
    variance or a determination that the manifest system is other~
    wise inapplicable to its spent solvent collection system.
    37—363

    Rule 201 of Chapter 9 requires a permit for transportation
    of special waste generated in Illinois or for transportation into
    Illinois for disposal,
    storage
    or treatment.
    Rules 301 and 302
    require a manifest for delivery or acceptance of special wastes.
    Waste
    is defined by
    Rule 103 as follows:
    “Waste” means any garbage, refuse, sludge from a waste
    treatment plant, water supply treatment plant or air
    pol-
    lution control facility or other discarded material includ-
    ing solid,
    liquid,
    semi-solid, or contained gaseous material
    resulting
    from industrial,
    commercial, mining
    and agricultur-
    al operations, and from community activities,
    If
    the spent solvent is a waste
    it is
    a special waste.
    How-
    ever,
    it is necessary to first determine whether the spent solvent
    is waste.
    Since
    it does not fit into any of the enumerated cate-
    gories the question is whether it is “other discarded material.”
    Since it is destined to be reused, rather than discarded,
    it is
    not waste.
    The fact that a small fraction is rejected from the
    clarification and distillation process to he landfilled does not
    change this conclusion.
    Even if the feedstock were crude oil,
    there would likely be some portion rejected from the purification
    process to be discarded.
    The Board does not seek in Chapter
    9 to
    regulate the movement of materials in general, but only waste
    (Rule 101 of
    Chapter
    9),
    Section 20 of the Environmental Protection Act provides that
    a purpose of the Act is to promote the conservation of natural re-
    sources by encouraging the recycling and reuse of waste materials.
    It would tend to defeat this purpose of the Act if the Board were
    to impose the expenses of compliance with the requirements of
    Chapter
    9 on persons
    who are engaged in recycling and reuse of
    materials which would otherwise be wasted
    (33
    PCB 131,
    147).
    The
    Board therefore will dismiss the petition.
    IT IS
    SO
    ORDERED,
    I, Christ~anL.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereb
    certify the above Order was adopted on
    the
    ~
    day ~
    1980 by
    a vote of
    ~tan.Moff,~lerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    37—364

    Back to top