ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February
7,
1980
SAFETY~KLEENCORPORATION,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB
80~l2
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Dr. Satchell):
This matter comes before the Board upon a variance petition
filed January 17,
1980 by Safety~KleenCorporation (Safety~
Kleen)
The Petitioner requests a variance from the requirements
of Chapter
9:
Special
Waste Hauling Regulations, or in the alter~
native
a finding that Chapter
9 is inapplicable to its spent
solvent collection and regeneration operations.
Safety—Kleen
leases solvent washing equipment to customers throughout the state.
Its customers are mostly engaged in automotive repair
and
industri~
al maintenance.
The equipment appears to typically consist of
a
covered sink,
solvent puma,
nozzle and return drain.
The equip~
ment
is
leased for a periodic charge which includes regularly
scheduled maintenance and solvent changes,
Safety~Kleenalso
provides solvent leasing service to persons who own equipment
manufactured by
others.
About 97
of
the
solvent handled by Safety~Kleenis mineral
spirit, which the Merck Index defines as
a flammable petroleum
fraction boiling in the range of 80°to 145°
C.
The remainder
is
a mixture of halogenated hydrocarbons with a water phase
solvent.
The spent solvents are transported in closed drums by
route trucks
to storage tanks
at the sales branch offices,
Tanker trucks periodically transport spent solvent from the sales
branches to one of Safety~Kleen~sregional solvent regeneration
facilities,
one of which is in Elgin, Illinois,
The spent solvent
is distilled after emulsions and sediment are removed,
Products
which are not reused as solvent or sold are disposed of at ap~
proved disposal sites,
This
is done utilizing the special waste
manifest procedures of Chapter
9,
Safety—Kleen requests
a
variance or a determination that the manifest system is other~
wise inapplicable to its spent solvent collection system.
37—363
Rule 201 of Chapter 9 requires a permit for transportation
of special waste generated in Illinois or for transportation into
Illinois for disposal,
storage
or treatment.
Rules 301 and 302
require a manifest for delivery or acceptance of special wastes.
Waste
is defined by
Rule 103 as follows:
“Waste” means any garbage, refuse, sludge from a waste
treatment plant, water supply treatment plant or air
pol-
lution control facility or other discarded material includ-
ing solid,
liquid,
semi-solid, or contained gaseous material
resulting
from industrial,
commercial, mining
and agricultur-
al operations, and from community activities,
If
the spent solvent is a waste
it is
a special waste.
How-
ever,
it is necessary to first determine whether the spent solvent
is waste.
Since
it does not fit into any of the enumerated cate-
gories the question is whether it is “other discarded material.”
Since it is destined to be reused, rather than discarded,
it is
not waste.
The fact that a small fraction is rejected from the
clarification and distillation process to he landfilled does not
change this conclusion.
Even if the feedstock were crude oil,
there would likely be some portion rejected from the purification
process to be discarded.
The Board does not seek in Chapter
9 to
regulate the movement of materials in general, but only waste
(Rule 101 of
Chapter
9),
Section 20 of the Environmental Protection Act provides that
a purpose of the Act is to promote the conservation of natural re-
sources by encouraging the recycling and reuse of waste materials.
It would tend to defeat this purpose of the Act if the Board were
to impose the expenses of compliance with the requirements of
Chapter
9 on persons
who are engaged in recycling and reuse of
materials which would otherwise be wasted
(33
PCB 131,
147).
The
Board therefore will dismiss the petition.
IT IS
SO
ORDERED,
I, Christ~anL.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereb
certify the above Order was adopted on
the
~
day ~
1980 by
a vote of
~tan.Moff,~lerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
37—364