ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 15, 1994
ILLINOIS LANDFILL, INC.,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 94—200
(Variance)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by N. McFawn):
This matter is before the Board on a July 25, 1994 petition
for variance filed by Illinois Landfill, Inc. (ILl). The
petition included a waiver of hearing, with supporting affidavit.
Additionally, ILl filed a motion for expedited decision on August
26, 1994. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
filed its recommendation and response on August 25, 1994. On
September 2, 1994, an objection to the petition for variance was
filed by Larry Slates, Lonnie Seymour, James Klaber, Faye Mott,
Hoopeston Community Memorial Hospital, and representative members
of C.A.R.E. Subsequently, on September 12, 1994, ILl filed a
waiver of the decision deadline until December 16, 1994.
Section 104.141(a) of the Board’s procedural rules provides:
Any person may file with the Clerk, within 21 days after the
filing of the petition, a written objection to the grant of
the variance. Such objection may or may not be accompanied
by a petition to intervene in accordance with Section
103.220. A copy of such objection shall be mailed to the
petitioner and the Agency by the Clerk.
Therefore, in order to be timely, an objection to a variance
petition must be filed within 21 days of the variance petition.
Pursuant to Section 104.140 of the Board’s procedural rules,
within 10 days after a petition for variance is tiled, the Agency
must publish notice of the petition in a newspaper of general
circulation in the county in which the installation or property
is located for which the variance is sought. The Agency
published notice of the instant variance petition on August 12,
1994, 18 days after the petition was filed. The published notice
stated that objections to the variance petition could be filed
within “21 days from publication of this notice.”
Because the objectors filed their objection 21 days after
notice of the petition was published, we will construe the
objection as timely filed, despite the fact that it was filed 39
2
days after the petition. We therefore accept this matter for
hearing.
The hearing must be scheduled and completed in a timely
manner, consistent with Board practices and the applicable
statutory decision deadline, or the decision deadline as extended
by a waiver (petitioner may file a waiver of the statutory
decision deadline pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.105). A
hearing officer shall be assigned to conduct hearings. The Clerk
of the Board shall promptly issue appropriate directions to the
assigned hearing officer consistent with this order.
The assigned hearing officer shall inform the Clerk of the
Board as soon as possible of the time and location of the hearing
since the public notice of hearing must be published at least
21 days in advance thereof. After hearing, the hearing officer
shall submit an exhibit list, a statement regarding credibility
of witnesses and all actual exhibits to the Board within five
days of the hearing. Any briefing schedule shall provide for
final filings as expeditiously as possible and, in time-limited
cases, no later than 30 days prior to the decision due date,
which is the final regularly scheduled Board meeting date on or
before the statutory or deferred decision deadline. Absent any
future waivers of the decision deadline, the statutory decision
deadline is now December 16, 1994; the Board meeting immediately
preceding the due date is scheduled for December 15, 1994.
If after appropriate consultation with the parties, the
parties fail to provide an acceptable hearing date or if after an
attempt the hearing officer is unable to consult with the
parties, the hearing officer shall unilaterally set a hearing
date in conformance with the schedule above. The hearing officer
and the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding as
much as possible.
At the time the variance petition was filed, the regulatory
deadline, September 18, 1994, from which petitioner seeks
variance preceded the Board’s decision deadline. Petitioner
therefore requested expedited relief to avoid the need for
retroactive relief. Given the subsequent objection and
petitioner’s waiver of the original decision deadline, the
premise underlying the motion is moot. Therefore, the motion is
denied. Recognizing, however, that the regulatory deadline will
have passed by the time this matter is ripe for decision, the
Board will consider this matter as quickly thereafter as
possible.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Boar~hereby cert .fy that the above order was adopted on the
/5~
day of
~.
,
1994, by a vote of
~ ~
~.
Dorothy M.~unn, Clerk
Illinois Pàilution Control Board