ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February 3,
1994
DART
CONTAINER CORPORATION,
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 94—47
(UST Fund)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by C.A. Manning):
On January 28,
1994, the Dart Container Corporation
(“Dart”)
filed a petition for review of an Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency (“Agency”) final UST Fund reimbursement decision.
Dart also
filed a motion to waive the recycled paper filing requirement. That
motion is hereby granted.
The Agency issued an invoice voucher on
December 13,
1993 accompanied by Attachment A which contains the
stated reasons for deductions,
and the final reimbursement check
was
issued
by
the
Comptroller
on
December
28,
1993.1
The
reimbursement determination concerns Dart’s facility located at 310
South Evergreen, North Aurora, Kane County,
Illinois. This matter
is hereby accepted for hearing.
The
hearing must
be
scheduled
and
completed
in
a
timely
manner,
consistent
with
Board
practices
and
the
applicable
statutory decision deadline
or the waiver provisions of 35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
101.105.
The
Chief
Hearing Officer
shall
assign
a
hearing officer to conduct hearings.
The Clerk of the Board shall
promptly
issue
appropriate
directions
to
the
assigned
hearing
officer consistent with this order.
The assigned hearing officer shall
inform the Clerk of the
Board of the time and location of the hearing at least 40 days in
advance of hearing so that public notice may be published.
After
1The Board
must
state
its reservations about
the Agency’s
statement,
on its invoice voucher, that “for purposes of appeal,
this voucher constitutes the Agency’s final decision as of the date
the check was issued by the Comptroller.”
Given the past history
of the UST Fund,
in which there have been long delays in payment
because the UST Fund was exhausted,
the Board
is concerned by a
scenario in which the Agency’s obligation to make a final decision,
which
cannot be amended
(see
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
AcTencv
v.
Pollution Control Board
(November 23,
1993),
No.
5-92-
0468),
is extended while the invoice voucher is awaiting payment by
the Comptroller.
(~
also Guether v. IEPA,
(February 3,
1994) PCB
93—232.)
2
hearing,
the
hearing
officer
shall
submit
an
exhibit
list,
a
statement
regarding
credibility
of
witnesses
and
all
actual
exhibits
to
the Board
within
five
days
of
the
hearing.
Any
briefing schedule shall provide for final filings as expeditiously
as possible and, in time—limited cases, no later than 30 days prior
to the decision due date, which is the final regularly scheduled
Board meeting date on or before the statutory or deferred decision
deadline.
In this case, pursuant to Section 40(a) (2) of the Act,
the statutory decision deadline
is May
28,
1994;
therefore,
the
decision due date is May 19,
1994.
If
after
appropriate
consultation
with
the
parties,
the
parties
fail to provide an acceptable hearing date or
if after
attempting to do so, the hearing officer is unable to consult with
the parties, the hearing officer shall unilaterally set a hearing
date in conformance with the above schedule.
The hearing officer
and the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding to the
extent possible.
This order will not appear in the Board’s opinion volumes.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy N.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board~hereby cert
that the above order was adopted on the
_____
day of
/
,
1994, by
a vote of
~
~.
~
Dorothy N.
9çmnn,
Clerk
Illinois Po1~utionControl Board
~~_1