ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October 20,
1994
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
ENHANCED VEHICLE INSPECTION
AND
)
R94-19
MAINTENANCE
(1/14) REGULATIONS
)
(Rulemaking)
AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL.
ADM. CODE
)
240
Proposed Rule. Second Notice.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by G. Tanner Girard):
By this opinion and order the Board proposes regulations for
Second Notice review by the Joint Committee on Administrative
Rules
(JCAR).
These proposed amendments pertain to a vehicle
inspection and maintenance program for the Chicago and
metropolitan East St. Louis areas of the state.
The purpose is
to aid the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
in
assembling an acceptable State Implementation Plan
(SIP)
for
ozone for these two areas of the state for submission to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.
EPA).
The Board’s responsibility in this matter arises from the
Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
(415 ILCS 5/1 et seq.
(1992)).
The Board is charged therein to “determine,
define and implement
the environmental control standards applicable in the State of
Illinois”
(415 ILCS 5/5(b)).
More generally, the Board’s
rulemaking charge is based on the system of checks and balances
integral to Illinois environmental governance: the Board bears
responsibility for the rulemaking and principal adjudicatory
functions; the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency)
is responsible for carrying out the principal administrative
duties.
The latter’s duties include administering today’s
proposed regulation.
Procedural Summary
On July 20,
1994, the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency
(Agency) filed this proposal for rulemaking pursuant to
Section 28.5(e)
of the Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
and
Section 13B-20 of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995
625
ILCS 5/13B—20
(see P.A. 88—533, effective January 18,
1994).
The Board accepted the proposal for hearing and proposed
amendments for First Notice publication in the Illinois Register
on July 21,
1994 pursuant to Section 28.5(f), which required the
Board to submit the proposed amendments for First Notice
publication within 14 days.
A Notice of Proposed Amendments
appeared in the Register on August 5,
1994,
at 18
Ill. Reg.
12021.
The Board conducted a public hearing on September 8,
1994
pursuant to Section 28.5(g) of the Act, which required the Board
to conduct a hearing within 55 days.
The transcript of that
hearing was available on September 14,
1994.
The hearing officer
2
subsequently cancelled hearings previously scheduled for October
7 and 21 at the request of the Agency, because we received no
objection to the rule from the United States Environmental
Protection Agency
(U.S.
EPA),
and because no person submitted
a
request for hearing by September
15,
1994.
Therefore the record
closed in this matter on September 28,
1994 pursuant to Section
28.5(1)
of the Act.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
The Board initially adopted a vehicle “inspection and
maintenance”
(I/N) program as part of
35 Ill. Adm. Code 240 in
R85—25 in 1986.
Sections 182(b)
and
(C)
of the federal Clean Air
Act (CAA),
as amended in 1990,
require the use of I/M programs in
areas not meeting the national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS)
for ozone or carbon monoxide.
The
CAA
specifies the use
of “basic” I/M programs in “moderate” nonattainment areas and in
“marginal” nonattainment areas with existing I/M programs.
It
requires the use of “enhanced” I/N programs in “serious”,
“severe”, and “extreme” ozone nonattainnient areas with urbanized
populations of 200,000 or more.
In Illinois, the Chicago and
Metro—East St.
Louis
(Metro—East)
areas are classified as
“severe” and “moderate” nonattainment for ozone,
respectively.
As such, they are subject to the federal I/N requirement.
Illinois recently adopted the Vehicle Emissions Inspection
Law of 1995
(625 ILCS 5/l3B),
P.A. 88—533, effective January 18,
1994.
That statute provides authority for the Agency to
implement an enhanced I/M program and meet U.S. EPA’s
requirements for such a program.
P.A. 88—533 mandates enhanced
1/14 testing for the Metro-East area and certain portions of the
Chicago nonattainment area.
P.A. 88—533, at new Section 13B-20, mandates that the Agency
propose and the Board adopt enhanced I/M rules by the identical-
in—substance rulemaking procedure.
The Agency proposed codified
U.S. EPA emissions standards concerning evaporative system
pressure and purge testing for the enhanced 1/14 program in
companion docket R94-20, proposed by the Board for public comment
on July 21,
1994,
by identical—in-substance procedures under
Section 28.4 of the Act.
However, major portions of the federal
enhanced I/N scheme are not codified in federal regulations, but
exist only as federal guidance.
Section 7.2 of the Act, which
defines “identical—in—substance” rulemaking and establishes
conditions for its use, allows the Board only to adopt federal
rules using the identical—in—substance procedure.
The Agency accordingly chose to use the next most expedient
procedural mechanism, that of Section 28.5 “fast—track”
rulemaking
(415 ILCS 5/28.5),
since this rulemaking also
implements the requirements of the federal CAA.
The Agency’s
proposal represented the procedural means by which the Agency
3
sought to achieve the mobile source emissions standards necessary
for the implementation of the enhanced I/M program.
The
standards proposed incorporate federal guidance.
Review of Record
Section 28.5(f) required the Board to publish the Agency’s
proposal as received by the Agency, without substantive review.
Section 28.5(m) prohibited the Board from revising the Agency’s
proposal until after the close of the record unless the Agency
agreed to the changes.
That provision restricts the Board in the
scope of any revisions during the course of this proceeding to
those “based on the record”.
The substantive record consists of the Agency’s proposal and
accompanying documents; the transcript of the September 8
hearing; four exhibits tendered by the Agency at hearing; the
document entitled “Identical First Notice Line Numbered Version”,
in which JCAR indicates its suggested corrections to the proposed
rules; and five public comments.
The exhibits tendered include
an Agency errata sheet
(Ex.
1); the personal resume of Elizabeth
R.
Tracy, Program Manager, Division of Vehicle Inspection and
Maintenance for the Agency
(Ex.
2); the personal resume of James
R. Matheny,
P.E., Manager, Technical Services Section, Division
of Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance for the Agency
(Ex.
3); and
the personal resume of Ronald L. Wohrle, Manager,
Field Services
Section, Division of Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance for the
Agency
(Ex.
4).
The public comments received were as follows:
PC
1 Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs,
by Linda D.
Brand, Manager of Regulatory Flexibility
Unit (to Vicki Thomas, Executive Director,
JCAR),
received August 11,
1994
PC
2 Browning—Ferris Industries, by William R. Uffelman,
Divisional Vice President, Government Affairs, Midwest
Region, received August 31,
1994
PC
3 Office of the Secretary of State,
by Connie Bradway,
Index Department, Administrative Code Division,
received September 7,
1994
PC
4 City of Chicago, by Maribeth Flowers, Assistant
Corporation Counsel, received September 19,
1994
PC 5 Agency, by Christopher P. Demeroukas, Assistant
Counsel, Division of Legal Counsel, received September
30,
1994
By PC
1, DCCA asserted that it defers to the findings of the
Board with regard to the impact of the proposed rules on small
businesses in Illinois.
By PC 2, Browning—Ferris Industries
4
(BFI)
voiced general support for the proposed rules, while
suggesting a single change in the proposed regulatory language to
enhance clarity.
The Secretary of State,
by PC 3, suggested two
minor format revisions to the proposed text.
By PC 4, the City
of Chicago voiced general support for the proposed rules,
highlighting the need for prompt adoption,
in order to achieve
the benefits of improved regional air quality and in order to
avoid federal sanctions.
The proposed changes suggested by PC 2
and PC
3 are discussed below.
At the public hearing, the Agency described the background
for its proposal, including the statutory and regulatory
background behind the proposal.
The Agency described that the
CAA
required Illinois to have submitted the statutory and
regulatory authority for a new vehicle 1/14 program by November
15,
1993.
The Agency stated that U.S. EPA notified Illinois on
December 30,
1993 that it would disapprove a proposed SIP
revision, thus triggering the federal sanctions provisions of the
CAA.
Illinois is required to submit a complete SIP request
involving a new vehicle 1/14 program within 18 months (i.e., by
June 30,
1995)
or face federal sanctions.
The possible sanctions
reportedly include an imposed one—for—one emissions offset for
new sources and the withdrawal of an estimated $710,000,000 in
federal highway funds.
The Agency described how the General
Assembly adopted P.A.
88-533 to confer the necessary statutory
authority in January,
1994, and how the present proposal flowed
from that authority.
(Tr.
10-12.)
According to the Agency,
U.S. EPA developed a performance
standard at 40 CFR 51, Subpart S for an I/N program.
In that
regulation, U.S. EPA sets forth the elements of an acceptable
program and the expected emissions reductions a state must meet
to have an acceptable program.
The Agency asserted that most of
the elements of the performance standard are not strictly
required by U.S. EPA,
so long as the emissions reductions
achieved by the state meet the federal objectives.
The Agency
stated that U.S. EPA has embodied additional standards into
guidance documents, upon which the Agency relied in assembling
the proposed vehicle 1/14 program amendments.
The Agency asserted
that the Board’s adoption of the proposed amendments would allow
the state to meet the federal objectives.
(Tr.
12-14.)
The Agency presented the testimony of Elizabeth R. Tracy and
James R. Matheny at hearing.
Ms. Tracy is in charge of the
operations of the Illinois vehicle emissions testing program.
She stated that the program presently tests 2,400,000 vehicles
each year at 19 stations in and around Chicago and three in the
Metro—East area, with 90 test lanes.
The tests are performed by
a contractor whose contract expires after 1995.
Since
1986, the
program has performed nearly 20,000,000 vehicle tests.
The
present test includes an emissions control systems tamper check
and a high idle/low idle tailpipe emissions test.
(Tr.
20—21.)
5
Ms. Tracy asserted that an enhanced I/N program is mandated
for the Chicago area by federal law.
Illinois has decided to
apply the enhanced program to the Metro-East area to aid in
achieving the federally-required 15 percent reduction in volatile
organic material
(VOM)
emissions for that area by 1996.’
Ms.
Tracy stated that the proposed enhanced vehicle I/N program would
help identify gross polluting vehicles, thus increasing the
efficiency and efficacy of a repair program and encouraging
proper maintenance.
It would also upgrade quality assurance.
The proposed new test,
called the “IN 240” for its 240 second
test cycle, would test 1981 and newer vehicles under load on a
dynamometer.
The program would include tests of the fuel
evaporative emissions control system,
a check of the on—board
vehicle emissions control diagnostic system,
and on—road testing
of emissions by remote sensors.
She stated that adoption of the
Agency proposal is
“an integral and necessary step” towards
compliance with the federal requirements.
Ms. Tracy estimated
that the number of vehicles included in the program will expand
by about five percent in the Chicago area
(by about 330,000
vehicles)
and by about 121 percent
(by about 185,000 vehicles)
in
the Metro—East area as a result of the new Vehicle Emissions
Inspection Law of 1995.
(Tr. 22—25.)
Ms. Tracy asserted that the Agency would attempt to build
conveniences into the enhanced I/N program.
These include a
testing location within 12 miles of each motorist’s home and a
maximum 20-minute waiting period for testing.
Staggered,
biennial testing will reduce the frequency of testing for most
vehicles.
(Tr. 24—25.)
Ms. Tracy stated that the Agency will implement the enhanced
testing program initially by adopting its own regulations for the
operation of the program.
Once the Board has adopted regulations
based on the Agency proposal and the Agency has adopted the
operational regulations, the Agency will submit a complete SIP
revision proposal to U.S. EPA.
(Tr.
26; see Tr. 50—51
& 58—63.)
Mr. Matheny testified that the most significant changes
involved in changing from the existing emissions testing program
to the enhanced vehicle 1/14 program are the enlarged geographic
area, the change to biennial testing for all vehicles, the use of
improved testing procedures, changes in the waiver requirements,
and other federally—required program features, such as procedures
for dealing with emissions—related recalls, the testing of on—
board diagnostic equipment,
and the on-road testing.
When fully
implemented, the program will involve testing all 1981 and newer
The Board notes that this is the goal for the Chicago and
Metro-East areas of the four “15
RAP
plan” proceedings filed by
the Agency to date:
R94—12, R94—15, R94-16, and R94-21.
6
vehicles using the IN 240 procedure.
The IN 240 procedure
consists of a series of vehicle accelerations, decelerations, and
high—speed cruises on a dynamometer to simulate on—road driving.
Older passenger cars and light-duty trucks, heavy-duty trucks,
and other vehicles that are unsuitable for dynamometer testing
will be tested using an upgraded version of the existing idle
emissions test.
Another change is the addition of a fuel
evaporative emissions control system test to check for possible
tampering and system operation.
(Tr.
31-34.)
Mr. Matheny stated that the enhanced vehicle I/N program
will have an increased emission reduction effectiveness by a
factor of three in the Chicago area and a factor of six in the
Metro-East area over the existing program.
By the end of 2000,
the Agency expects the reduction in VOM emissions to increase
from 35.2 tons per day
(tpd) to 95.9 tpd in the Chicago area and
from 1.9 tpd to 12.6 tpd in the Metro-East area.
The Agency’s
technical review has assertedly placed it in the position to
prove to U.S. EPA that the enhanced I/M program will meet the
federal requirements.
Mr. Matheny asserted that the enhanced I/N
program will reduce area VOM and nitrogen oxide
(NOr) emissions
to meet the federal program performance standards, provided the
emissions standards proposed by the Agency are adopted by the
Board.
(Tr.
34—36.)
Mr. Matheny testified that the Agency proposed emissions
standards identical to those recommended by U.S. EPA for use with
the
114 240 test.
These include startup standards, for use during
the first two years of program implementation, and final
standards,
for use after startup.
He said that the startup
standards are intended to smooth the transition from the existing
testing to the enhanced program.
The final standards are set at
levels believed necessary to achieve compliance by 2000.
Mr.
Matheny explained that the IM 240 test provides model year groups
within three vehicle classes:
light duty vehicles (passenger
cars),
light duty trucks
1
(up to 6,000 pounds gross vehicle
weight
(gvwr)),
and light duty trucks
2
(6,001 to 8,500 gvwr).
Separate emissions standards are provided for vehicles certified
for the tighter Tier
1 emissions standards of the 1990
CAA
amendments.
(Tr. 37—40
& 49—50.)
The Agency has proposed two standards for each model year—
vehicle class group.
The composite standards are mass emissions
rates over the entire 240 seconds of the IN 240 test cycle.
Phase
2 standards are the emissions rates allowed over the second
segment of the test cycle (seconds 94 through 239).
A vehicle
passes the IM 240 test if either the composite emissions levels
are below the composite emissions standards or the Phase
2
emissions levels are below the Phase
2 emissions standards for
that model year and vehicle class for the vehicle.
(Tr.
40—41.)
7
Mr. Natheny stated that most other states implementing an
enhanced 1/N program are using the federally-recommended IM 240
test.
He said that some states have chosen more stringent
emissions limitations if necessary to achieve the federal
performance standard for the particular nonattainment area.
More
stringent standards are used to offset program design
differences,
like model year and vehicle type exemptions
in the
particular area.
(Tr.
37-39.)
Mr. Natheny testified that there are only very minimal
differences in the emissions standards used in the steady—state
idle test.
He said that the Agency did not propose more
stringent emissions standards for pre—1981 vehicles because doing
so would have resulted in insignificant changes.
The Vehicle
Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 allows the use of the present
steady-state idle exhaust test for vehicles in model years 1968
through 1980,
on heavy-duty vehicles (those with a gvwr greater
than 8,500 pounds), and on any vehicle whose design or
configuration does not allow the use of the IM 240 test.
The
only differences are the redefinition of heavy duty trucks
(changing the lower weight limit from 8,000 pounds gvwr to 8,500
gvwr), splitting light duty trucks into two categories
(light-
duty trucks
1 and light-duty trucks
2
(and increasing the upper
limit to 8,500 pounds gvwr), and lowering the carbon monoxide
(CO) and unburned hydrocarbons
(HC)
emissions standards for post—
1980 light-duty trucks
(classes 1 and 2)
(from 3.0
to 1.2
and
300 parts per million
(ppm)
to 220 ppm, respectively).
The
steady-state idle test is further improved by using an “initial
idle mode”,
a high—idle “conditioning mode”, and a “second—chance
idle mode”,
to assure that any initial failure was not due to
inadequate vehicle warm—up or preparation and giving each vehicle
an immediate second chance to pass the test.
(Tr.
37-43.)
The Agency intends to have all the regulations
(both Board
and Agency regulations)
in place in early 1995, so it may begin
implementation of the enhanced 1/14 program.
The Agency is
presently preparing a request for proposals to obtain a
contractor to perform the testing.
The Agency intends to enter
into a contract by time the regulations are adopted.
However,
the Agency conceded that it is possible that it may submit a
proposed SIP revision including the program even if some elements
are not fully finalized.
(Tr. 50-53.)
A member of the general public questioned the Agency
witnesses at the September 8,
1994 public hearing.
Mr. John
Wright,
of Martha Technologies inquired about the proposed
release date for the Agency’s request for quotations on the
testing contract.
The Agency responded that it intended to
release the~request in mid-October,
for a possible contract
inception date of January
1,
1996.
(Tr.
63-66.)
Aside from
questions by Board members and staff and the public comments
8
received, the Board received nothing further on the Agency’s
proposal.
Revisions to Agency’s Proposal
As noted above, the Board is constrained to rely on the
record in revising the Agency’s proposal without the Agency’s
consent.
The Board has,
in fact, made a small number of
corrections in the text of the rules as originally proposed by
the Agency.
In the First Notice proposal, we made agreed minor
corrections prior to submission for publication in the Illinois
Register.
These very minor corrections were made with the prior
consent of the Agency.
They involved corrections to the Illinois
Administrative Code-Illinois Register format of the proposed
amendments and the elimination of a duplicate definition.
At the September
8 public hearing, the Agency further
submitted an “errata sheet”
(Ex.
1).
The changes made by the
Board from the First Notice—proposed text based on this errata
sheet included correction of the citation to the Vehicle
Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 at Section 240.151
(a change
also requested by JCAR staff) and the addition of the words “at
or” in two places in the fifth sentence of Section 240.164.
The Agency later requested a single set of simple changes.
As a result of this request, the Board has changed
“=“
in
Sections 240.Table A and 240.Table B to
“?“.
This use of the
correct scientific symbol comports with the Board’s general
tendency to use the appropriate technical symbols for enhanced
clarity.
Beyond these Agency—consented changes, the Board has
necessarily made minor revisions based on JCAR and Secretary of
State
(PC
3)
requests.
We changed the Administrative Code-
Illinois Register format of the definitions of “loaded mode” and
“test procedure”
in Section 240.102 in response to PC
3 and
JCAR’s “Identical First Notice Line Numbered Version”.
In
response to verbal JCAR requests, the Board has revised the
format to citations to the Act at the main source note and at
Sections 240.101 and 240.105(a);
citations to the vehicle
inspection statute at Sections 240.104,
240.105(b), and 240.151;
and citations to the Illinois Vehicle Code at Section 240.102
(definition of “motor vehicle”).
We further corrected
punctuation in Section 240.102 in response to the verbal JCAR
request:
hyphenating “steady-state” in the definition of “high-
idle”, removing the commas from the numbers in the definitions of
“light duty truck 1” and “light duty truck 2”, and adding commas
in the definitions of “motor vehicle” and “tier 1”.
9
A final change relates to codification constraints imposed
on the Board by JCAR.
JCAR has requested that the Board not
include the date in citations to the Illinois Compiled Statutes.
The text of the Agency proposal originally included these dates,
but the Board deleted them upon request by JCAR.
We believe that
the dates are useful because subsequent statutory amendments
would hinder any future research into the authorities cited.
To
accommodate JCAR and at least partially achieve the goal of
complete citation to authorities, we have added a Board Note to
Part 240.
This follows our action with regard to Part 211,
218,
and 219 in R94—15 and R94—16.
The record does not support revision of the Agency’s
proposed amendments on any other basis.
This is despite the
comments of BFI
(PC 2).
BFI suggested that the Board should
revise the language of Section 240.104 to incorporate the
inspection applicability language from Section 13B—15 of the
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995.
BFI states that
confusion is possible relating to the applicability of the
amended inspection regulations to diesel—powered vehicles.
Section 13B—l5(f)(8) expressly exempts diesel-powered and
exclusively electric-powered vehicles.
BFI states that the
presence of a definition of “diesel engine”
in Section 240.102
might confuse persons in the regulated community as to the
applicability of the inspection requirements.
The Agency responds that no change is desireable.
First,
the Agency highlights that the Section 240.104 applicability
statement refers directly to Section 13B-15 for applicability.
Second, the Agency highlights that Part 240 includes regulations
for inspection of diesel—powered vehicles at Subparts B and C.
(The vehicles subject to the enhanced I/N program are subject to
Subparts B and D through F.)
Third, the Agency asserts that
incorporating the language of Section 13B-15 directly into
Section 240.104 would require a regulatory amendment in the event
of a statutory amendment before the Agency could implement the
revised intent of the General Assembly.
While the Board generally prefers to have the regulations
appear in as complete a form as possible for clarity and the
benefit of the regulated community, we agree with the Agency in
this instance that the BFI-requested change is not desireable.
We note that the universe of vehicles subject to inspection under
the enhanced I/M program is essentially the same as it presently
is under the existing program.
(~
625 ILCS 5/13A-104(d)(8).)
Further, vehicles are subject to inspection upon notice to the
owner by the Agency under both programs.
(~
625 ILCS 5/13A-
104(a)
& 13B-15(a).)
Under these circumstances, the Board
believes that the likelihood of confusion is minimal and that any
such likelihood is quickly dispelled by reference to the Agency-
proposed text of Section 240.104 and Section 13B—15 cited
therein.
10
ORDER
The Board directs the Clerk to cause the filing of the
following proposal for Second Notice review by the Joint
Committee on Administrative Rules:
TITLE 35:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SUBTITLE B:
AIR POLLUTION
CHAPTER I:
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SUBCHAPTER k:
EMISSION
STANDARDS
AND
LIMITATIONS FOR MOBILE SOURCES
PART 240
MOBILE SOURCES
SUBPART A:
DEFINITIONS AND
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section
2.40. 101
240.102
240. 103
240.104
240.105
240.106
240.107
Section
240. 121
240. 122
240. 123
240.124
240. 125
Section
240.140
240.141
Preamble
Definitions
Prohibitions
Inspection
Penalties
Determination of Violation
Incorporations by Reference
SUBPART
B:
EMISSIONS
Smoke Emissions
Diesel Engine Emissions Standards for Locomotives
Liquid Petroleum Gas Fuel Systems
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards
Compliance Determination
SUBPART
C:
HEAVY-DUTY
DIESEL
SMOKE
OPACITY STANDARDS AND TEST PROCEDURES
Applicability
Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Smoke Opacity Standards and
Test Procedures
Section
240. 151
240.152
240.153
SUBPART D:
STEADY-STATE IDLE MODE TEST
EMISSION STANDARDS
Ami~licability
Steady—State Idle Mode Vehicle Exhaust Emission
Standards
Compliance Determination
SUBPART E:
TRANSIENT LOADED MODE TEST
Section
240.161
EMISSION STANDARDS
Applicability
11
240.162
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up Standards
240.163
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final Standards
240.164
Compliance Determination
SUBPART
F:
EVAPORATIVE
TEST
STANDARDS
Section
240.
171
Applicability
240.Appendix A Rule into Section Table
240.Appendix B Section into Rule Table
240.Table A
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up Standards
240.Table B
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final Standards
AUTHORITY:
Implementing Sections
9,
10
and
13 and authorized by
Sections 27 and 28.5 of the Environmental Protection Act
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1989,
oh. 111
1/2, pars.
1009,
1010,
1013 and 1027)
415
ILCS 5/9,
10,
13,
27, and 28.5)
and Section 13B—20 of the
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995
625
ILCS 5/13B—201
(see
P.A.
88—533, effective January
18,
1994).
SOURCE:
Adopted as Chapter 2:
Air Pollution, Part VII:
Mobile
Sources, filed and effective April
14,
1972; codified at
7 Ill.
Reg.
13628; amended in R85—25,
at 10 Ill. Reg.
11277,
effective
June 16,
1986; amended in R90—20 at 16
Ill. Reg.
6184,
effective
April
7,
1992; amended in R94—19 at
Ill.
Rep.
effective
BOARD NOTE:
This Part implements the Environmental Protection
Act as of July
1,
1994.
NOTE:
Capitalization denotes statutory language.
SUBPART A:
DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 240.101
Preamble
As the state of knowledge and technology relating to the control
of emissions from motor vehicles shall permit and make
appropriatcadvances, and in furtherance of the purposes of the
Environmental Protection Act
(Ill.
flcv.
Stat.
1981,
oh.
111 1/2,
pare.
1001 Ct ~cq.)415
ILCS
5)
(Act), the Pollution Control
Board
(Board)
shall provide for by rules and regulations for the
control of emissions from motor vehicles.
Such rules and
regulations shall prescribe requirements for the installation and
use of equipment designed to reduce or eliminate emissions and
for the proper maintenance of such equipment and of vehicles.
Any rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to this Section
shall be consistent with provisions of federal law,
if any,
relating to control of emissions from the vehicles concerned.
12
(Source:
Amended at
Ill.
Reg.
_______
,
effective
Section 240.102
Definitions
All terms which appear in this Part have the definitions
specified in this Part and 35 Ill.
Adni.
Code 201 and 211.
Where
conflicting definitions occur,
the definitions of this Section
apply in this Part.
“Diesel ~ngine”÷
means A~lltypes of
internal—combustion engines
in which air is compressed
to a temperature sufficiently high to ignite fuel
injected directly into the cylinder area.
“Diesel ~ocomotive”÷
means A~,diesel engine vehicle
designed to move cars on a railway.
“Driver”:
The
came
meaning
ac defined in the Illinoic
Vehicle Code,
Ill.
Rev.
Ctat.
1939,
oh.
95-1/2,
par.
116.1.
IfFlcetIt:
Five or more vehiclec.
“Full
Ppower
Pposition”÷
means
~he
throttle
position
at which the engine fuel delivery is at maximum flow.
“Gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR)” means the value
specified by the manufacturer as the maximum design
loaded weight of a single vehicle.
“Heavy ~uty
~vehicle”÷ means Aany motor vehicle rated
at more thanwith 8,0008500 pounds or greater
manufacturer’s maximum grosc vehicle weight rating
-(-GVWR)- or that has a vehicle curb weight of more than
6000 pounds or that has a basic vehicle frontal area in
excess of 45 square feet.
“High ~jdle”÷ means ~hat
portion of
a two-~pecdsteady-
state idle test conducted with the engine operating at
a speed of approximately 2500 RPM.
“Idle M~ode”+means ~hat
portion of a vehicle emission
test procedure conducted with the engine disconnected
from an external load and operating at minimum
throttle.
“Initial idle mode” means the first of up to two idle
mode sampling periods during
a steady—state idle mode
test,
during which exhaust emission measurements are
made with the vehicle in “as—received” condition.
13
——~--
~——~-.L~———.-—-
-
pounds gross vehicle weight or less which is designed
for carrying more than 10 persons or designed for the
transportation of property, freight or cargo,
or
is a
derivative of such a vehicle.
“Light duty truck 1” means a motor vehicle rated at
6000 pounds maximum
GVWR
or less and which has a
vehicle frontal area of 45 square feet or less,
and
which is designed primarily for purposes of
transportation of pro~ertvor is a derivation of such a
vehicle,
or is designed primarily for transportation of
persons and has a capacity of more than 12 persons, or
is available with special features enabling off—street
or off—highway operation and use.
“Light duty truck 2” means a motor vehicle rated
between 6001 and 8500 pounds maximum
GVWR
and which has
a vehicle frontal area of 45 square feet or less, and
which is designed primarily for purposes of
transportation of property or is a derivation of such a
vehicle,
or is designed primarily for transportation of
persons and has a capacity of more than 12 persons, or
is available with special features enabling off—street
or off—highway operation and use.
“Light Dduty Vyehicle”÷means A
passenger car
uc~j.yncu
to carry not more than 10 peroonsa passenger car or
passenger car derivative capable of seating 12
passengers or fewer.
“Loaded mode” means that portion of a vehicle emission
test procedure conducted with the vehicle positioned
and operating under load on a chassis dynamometer.
“Loaded vehicle weight
(LVW)” means the vehicle curb
weight plus 300 pounds.
“Measured values” means five second running averages of
exhaust emission concentrations sampled at a minimum
rate of twice per second.
“Model ~year”÷ means ~he
year of manufacture of a
motor vehicle based upon the annual production period
as designated by the manufacturer and indicated on the
title and registration of the vehicle.
If the
manufacturer does not designate a production period for
the vehicle, then “model year” means the calendar year
of manufacture.
“Motor Vvehicle”÷ Aas used in this section Part,~
motor vchicle” shall have the same meaning as in
14
Section 1-146 of the Illinois Vehicle Code
(Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1989,
oh. 95 1/2,
par. l-146)f625 ILCS 5/1—1461.
“Opacity”:
That fraction of light, expressed in
percent, which when transmitted from a source through a
smoke—obscured path,
is prevented from reaching the
observer or instrument receiver.
“Preconditioning mode” means a period of steady—state
loaded mode or high—idle operation conducted to ensure
that the engine and emissions control system components
are operating at normal operating temperatures, thus
minimizing false failures caused by improper or
insufficient warm—up.
“Pressure test” means a test of a vehicle’s evaporative
emission control system to verify the system’s
integrity by identifying the presence of system leaks
by iniecting an inert gas into the system and
confirming the system’s ability to hold pressure over a
specified period of time.
“Purge test” means
a test of the vehicle’s evaporative
emission control system to determine the ability of the
system to properly recycle gasoline vapors captured and
adsorbed on the charcoal in the system’s canister.
The
purge test consists of determining the volume of vapor
flow between the canister and the enqine as measured
durin~the course of the transient loaded
(114240)
exhaust emissions test.
“Second—chance idle mode” means the second of two idle
mode sampling periods during a steady-state idle mode
test,
preceded by
a preconditioning mode and utilized
as a second chance to pass idle exhaust emission
standards immediately following an initial idle mode
failure.
“Smokemeter or ~Qpacimeter”÷ means A~noptical
instrument designed to measure the opacity of smoke or
diesel exhaust gases using the light extinction method.
“Snap-idle ~ycle”÷
means R~apidlydepressing the
accelerator pedal from normal idle to the full power
position while the vehicle
is in neutral, holding the
pedal
in the position for no longer than ten seconds or
until the engine reaches maximum cpecd~, and fully
releasing the pedal so that the engine decelerates to
normal idle.
“Steady—state idle test” means a vehicle emission test
procedure consisting of an initial idle mode
15
measurement of exhaust emissions followed,
if
necessary, by a loaded or high idle preconditioning
mode and
a second—chance idle mode.
“Tier
1” means the exhaust emission standards required
by the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 that require
auto makers to reduce tailpipe emissions of
hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen by 35
and 60,
respectively, from pre-existing standards, beginning
with 40
of the vehicles sold in 1994.
80
in 1995,
and
100
thereafter.
“Transient loaded mode test” means a vehicle emissions
test run on an inertial and cower absorbing dynamometer
using USEPA’s 1M240 driving cycle consisting of
accelerations and decelerations simulating on—road
driving conditions.
“Test Procedure”+ means ~he
preparation,
preconditioning sequence and smoke opacity measurement
processes using the snap idle cycle for determining
compliance with Section 240.141.
“Two—S~peed~idle ‘P~est”i-means A~,vehicle emission
test procedure consisting of the measurements of
exhaust emission in high idle and idle modes.
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
Section 240.104
Inspection
All motor vehicles subject to inspection pursuant to Section
l3A-l04 of the Illinois Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1085,
Ch.
95 1/2,
par.
13A—104) 625
ILCS 5/13A—104)
shall comply with the exhaust emission standards for carbon
monoxide and hydrocarbons set forth at Section 240.124 of this
Part.
All motor vehicles subiect to inspection pursuant to
Section 13B—15 of the Illinois Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law
of 1995
(Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995)
1625 ILCS
5/13B—15
(see P.A. 88—533, effective January 18.
1994)
shall
com~lvwith applicable vehicle emission standards contained in
Sections 240.152, 240.162,
240.163, 240.172, and 240.173 of this
Part.
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
_____________________________________________________
)
Section 240.105
Penalties
a)
Any violations of Sections 240.103, 240.121, 240.122,
and 240.123 of this Part shall be subject to the
16
penalties
as
set
forth
in
Section
42 of the Act
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1985,
oh.
lii
1/2,
par.
1042)1415
ILCS
5/421.
b)
Any
violations of Sections 240.104
and
240.124
of this
Part shall be subject to the penalties as set forth in
Sections 13A-112 and 13A—113 of the Vehicle Emissions
Inspection Law
(Ill.
Rev. Stat.
1985,
oh.
95
1,’2,
par.
13A—112,
13A—113)1625 ILCS 5/13A—1l2 and l3A—113).
~j
Any violations of Sections 240.152, 240.162,
240.163,
240.172, and 240.173 of this Part shall be sub-ject to
the penalties as set forth in Sections 13B—55 and 13B-
60 of the Vechicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995.
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
_____________________________________________________
)
Section 240.106
Determination of Violation
a)
Any violations of Sections 240.103, 240.121,
240.122,
and 240.123 of this Part shall be determined by visual
observation; or by a test procedure employing an
opacity measurement system as qualified by 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 201,
Subpart J.
b)
Any violations of Section~240.124,
240.152,
240.162.
240.163,
240.172,
or 240.173 of this Part shall be
determined in accordance with test procedures adopted
by the Agency in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 276.
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
_____________________________________________________
)
Section 240.107
Incorporations by Reference
The following materials are incorporated by reference and include
no later editions or amendments:
a)
Society of Automotive Engineers
(SAE),
400 Commonwealth
Drive,
Warrendale, PA 15096:
Report J255a Diesel
Engine Smoke Measurement (August,
1978).
b)
International Standards Organization
(ISO), Case
Postale 56,
1211 Geneva 20,
Switzerland:
ISO 393
(Working Draft, January 1991).
Also available from
American National Standards Institute (ANSI),
11 West
42nd Street, New York,
NY 10036.
~j
United States Environmental Protection Agency
(tJSEPA),
2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105:
Report EPA-
AA—EPSD-IM-93-1, High—Tech
1/14 Test Procedures,
17
Emission Standards, Quality Control Requirements, and
Equipment Specifications
(April 1994).
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
,
effective
_____________________________________________________
)
SUBPART
B:
EMISSIONS
Section 240.124
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards
a)
Exhaust emissions from light duty vehicles shall not
exceed the following limitations:
Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons as Hexane
()
(ppm)
9.0
900
8.0
800
7.0
700
6.0
3.0
1.2
220
b)
Exhaust emissions from light duty trucks, which for the
purposes of this subsection means a motor vehicle rated
at 8000 rounds ~ross vehicle weight or less which is
designed for carrying more than 10 persons or designed
for the transportation of property. freight or cargo,
or is a derivative of such a vehicle,
shall not exceed
the following limitations:
Model Year
(ppm)
1968
—
1971
900
1972
—
1974
800
1975
—
1978
700
1979
—
1980
600
1981
—
1983
300
1984 and later
220
c)
Exhaust emissions from heavy duty vehicles~.which for
the purposes of this subsection means a vehicle with
8001 pounds or greater manufacturer’s
maximum cross
vehicle weight rating
(GVWR),
shall not exceed the
following limitations:
Model Year
Carbon Monoxide
Hydrocarbons as Hexane
()
(ppm)
1968
—
1971
9.5
1500
1972
—
1978
9.0
900
1979
—
1984
7.0
700
1985
and
later
Model Year
1968
—
1971
1972
—
1974
1975
—
1977
1978
—
1979
1980
1981 and later
600
300
Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons as Hexane
()
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
3.0
1.2
3.0
300
18
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
Section 240.125
Compliance Determination
For purposes of determining compliance with Section 240.124 of
this Part,
all vehicles shall be inspected while operating in the
idle mode,
and all 1981 and later model year light duty vehicles
and light duty trucks
(as defined in Subsection 240.124(b)
of
this Part)
shall be inspected at high idle during a two-speed
idle test.
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
SUBPART D:
STEADY-STATE IDLE MODE TEST EMISSION STANDARDS
Section 240.151
Applicability
The standards of Subpart D apply to all vehicles inspected upon
implementation of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995
and identified
in Subsections 13B-25(c) and
(d)
of that law
utilizing steady—state exhaust emission test procedures adopted
by the Agency.
(Source:
Added at
_____
Ill. Reg.
_______
,
effective
_____________________________________________)
Section 240.152
Steady-State Idle Mode Vehicle Exhaust
Emission Standards
~j
Exhaust emissions from light duty vehicles shall not
exceed the following limitations:
Model Year
Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons as Hexane
(~~m)
1968
—
1971
1972
—
1974
~Q_Q.
1975
—
1977
1978
—
1979
6.0
600
1980
1981 and later
220
~j
Exhaust emissions from light duty trucks
1 and light
duty trucks
2 shall not exceed the following
limitations:
Model Year
Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons as Hexane
In
Ipi,m)
1968
—
1971
1972
—
1974
8.0
800
19
1975
—
1978
7.0
LQ&
1979
—
1980
~QQ
1981 and later
1.2
220
~j
Exhaust emissions from heavy duty vehicles shall not
exceed the following limitations:
Model Year
Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons as Hexane
IlL
(ppm)
1968
—
1971
1500
1972
—
1978
900
1979
—
1984
700
1985
and
later
3.0
300
(Source:
Added at
Ill.
Reg.
________
,
effective
_____________________________________________ )
Section
240.153
Compliance
Determination
Compliance
shall
be
determined
based upon the measurement of
exhaust
emissions
using
the
steady-state
idle
test while the
vehicle
to
be
tested is operating in the idle mode.
The vehicle
shall pass exhaust emissions inspection
if
at
any
time
during
the
initial idle mode or second-chance idle mode of the steady-state
idle test the measured values are at or below the applicable
limits of Section 240.152 of this Subpart.
Vehicles failing the
initial idle mode shall undergo a loaded or high idle
preconditioning mode and receive
a second—chance idle mode
unless no measured values
less than 1800 ppm HC are obtained
within an elapsed time of 30 seconds.
(Source:
Added at
Ill. Reg.
,
effective
_________________________________________ )
SUBPART
E:
TRANSIENT LOADED MODE TEST EMISSION STANDARDS
Section 240.161
Applicability
The standards of this Subpart a~~lvto model year 1981 and newer
light duty vehicles, light duty trucks
1. and light duty trucks
2
which are inspected utilizing transient IM240 loaded mode exhaust
emission test procedures adopted by the Agency in 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 276.
(Source:
Added at
_____
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
_______
_____________________________________________)
Section 240.162
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start—Up Standards
Vehicle exhaust emission start—up standards contained in Section
240.Table A of this Part shall apply for all vehicles sublect to
20
inspection until December 31,
1997.
Tier
1 standards shall apply
to all model year 1996 and newer vehicles and model year 1994 and
newer vehicles certified to Tier
1 standards.
All standards are
expressed in grams per mile (qpm).
(Source:
Added at
_____
Ill. Reg.
_______
,
effective
______
_____________________________________________)
Section 240.163
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final Standards
Vehicle exhaust emission final standards contained in Section
240.Table B of this Part shall apply for all vehicles sublect to
inspection beainning on January
1,
1998.
Tier
1 standards shall
apply to all model year 1996 and newer vehicles and model year
1994 and newer vehicles certified to Tier 1 standards.
All
standards are expressed in grams per mile (gpm).
(Source:
Added at
_____
Ill. Reg.
_______
,
effective
______
Section 240.164
Compliance Determination
Compliance shall be determined based upon the measurement of
exhaust
emissions
while
operating
the
vehicle
on
a
dynamometer
and
following
the
driving
cycle
as s~ecifled for the transient
IM240 test procedures adopted by the Agency.
If
the
corrected,
composite emission rates exceed standards for any pollutant,
additional analysis of test results shall review the second phase
(“Phase 2”)
of the driving cycle separately.
Phase
2 shall
include second 94 through second 239 of the driving cycle.
Second—by—second emission rates
in grams and composite emission
rates
in grams per mile for Phase
2 and for the entire composite
test shall be recorded for each ~o1lutant.
For any given
pollutant,
if the composite emission level is at or below the
composite standard or if the Phase
2 grams per mile emission
level is at or below the applicable Phase
2 standard, then the
vehicle shall pass the test for that pollutant.
Composite and
Phase
2 emission rates shall be calculated in accordance with
procedures specified in “High—Tech I/M Procedures, Emissions
Standards, Quality Control Requirements, and Equipment
Specifications Final Technical Guidance” incorporated by
reference at Section 240.107 of this Part.
(Source:
Added at
_____
Ill.
Reg.
________
,
effective
SUBPART
F:
EVAPORATIVE TEST STANDARDS
Section 240.171
Applicability
21
~I
The standards of Section 240.172 of this Subpart shall
apply to all model year 1968 and newer vehicles
required at the time of manufacture to be equipped with
evaporative emission control systems.
~j
The standards of Section 240.173 of this Subpart shall
apply to model year 1981 and newer light duty vehicles.
light duty trucks
1, and light duty trucks
2 that are
inspected utilizing the transient loaded mode exhaust
emission test procedures adopted by the Agency.
(Source:
Added at
)
Ill.
Reg.
_______
,
effective
Section 240.Table A:
Vehicle
Exhaust
Emission
Start-Up
Standards
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide Oxides of Nitrogen
Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2
(ppm)
(gpm)
(ppm)
(gpm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
Tier
1
(1994+) 0.80
0.50
15.0
12.0
2.0
Reserved
1991—1995
1.20
0.75
20.0
16.0
2.5
Reserved
1983—1990
2.00
1.25
30.0
24.0
3.0
Reserved
1981—1982
2.00
1.25
60.0
48.0
~Q
Reserved
Light Duty Trucks
1:
Light Duty Trucks
2:
0.80
1.00
2.40
3.20
3.20
7.50
0.50
0.63
1.50
2.00
2.00
5.00
15.0
20.0
60.0
80.0
80.0
100.0
12.0
16.0
48.0
64.0
64
.
0
80.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
7.0
7.0
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide Oxides of
Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2 Composite
Nitrogen
Phase
2
(gpm)
(gpin)
Tier
1
(1994+)
(?3750
LVW)
(3750
LVW)
1991—1995
(gpm)
(gpm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
Reserved
Reserved
Reserved
1988—1990
Reserved
1984—1987
Reserved
1981—1983
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide Oxides of
Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2 Composite
(gum)
(ppm)
(gpm)
(ppm)
(gpm)
Tier
1
(1994+)
(?5750
LVW)
1.00
0.63
20.0
16.0
2.5
(5750
LVW)
2.40
1.50
60.0
48.0
4.0
1991—1995
2.40
1.50
60.0
48.0
4.5
Reserved
Nitrogen
Phase
2
(ppm)
Reserved
Reserved
Reserved
1988—1990
3.20
2.00
80.0
64.0
5.0
Reserved
1984—1987
3.20
2.00
80.0
64.0
7.0
Reserved
1981—1983
7.50
5.00
100.0
80.0
7.0
Reserved
22
(Source:
Added at
_____
Ill.
Reg.
________
effective
Section 240.Table B:
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final
Standards
Li~htDuty Vehicles:
Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2
(ppm)
(ppm)
(cipm)
(ctpm)
(~m)
(ppm)
Tier
1
(1994+) 0.60
0.40
10.0
~
Reserved
1983—1995
0.80
0.50
15.0
12.0
~Q
Reserved
1981—1982
0.80
0.50
30.0
24.0
~
Reserved
Light
Duty
Trucks
1:
Light Duty Trucks
2:
IT
IS
SO
ORDERED
I, Dorothy N.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above opinion and order was
adopted on the
___________________
day of
_____________________
1994,
by
a
vote
of
Model
Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide Oxides of Nitrogen
0.60
0.80
1.60
1.60
3.40
0.40
0.50
1.00
1.00
2
.
00
10.0
13
.
0
40.0
40.0
70.0
8.0
10.
0
32.0
32.0
56.0
1.5
1.8
2.5
4.5
4.5
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide Oxides of
Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2 Composite
Nitrogen
Phase
2
(ppm)
(cipm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(qpm)
Tier
1
(1994+)
Reserved
Reserved
Reserved
(?3750 LVW)
(3750
LVW)
1988—1995
1984—1987
Reserved
1981—1983
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide Oxides of
Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2 Composite
Reserved
Nitrogen
Phase
2
(gpm)
(gp~)
(gpm)
(ppm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
Tier
1
(1994+)
(?5750
LVW)
0.80
0.50
(5750
LVW)
0.80
0.50
1988—1995
1.60
1.00
13.0
10.0
15.0
12.0
40.0
32.0
1.8
2.0
3~
Reserved
Reserved
Reserved
1984—1987
1.60
1.00
40.0
32.0
j~
Reserved
1981—1983
3.40
2.00
70.0
56.0
4.5
Reserved
(Source:
Added at
)
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
23
Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
22
(Source:
Added at
)
Ill.
Reg.
________
effective
St~ir~,
24O..T~h1e~
Vehicle
F~eh~ust
Thniesion Fin~1 Standards
Light
Duty
Vehicles:
Composite Phase
2
Composite
Phase
2 Composite Phase
2
(gpm)
(qpm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(~~m)
Tier
1
(1994+)
0.60
0.40
10.0
.~Q
~
Reserved
1983—1995
0.80
0.50
15.0
12.0
~
Reserved
1981—1982
0.80
0.50
30.0
24.0
~
Reserved
Light
Duty Trucks
2:
Model
Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon
Monoxide
Oxides
of
Nitrogen
Light Duty Trucks
1:
Model
Years
Tier
1
(1994+)
(?3750
LVW)
(3750
LVW)
1988—1995
1984—1987
198 1—19 83
0.
60
0.80
1.60
1.60
3.40
0.40
0.50
1.00
1.00
2
.
00
10.0
13. 0
40.0
40.0
70.0
8.0
10.0
32.0
32.0
56.0
Model
Years
1.5
1.8
2.5
4.5
4.5
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide Oxides of
Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2 Composite
Nitrogen
Phase
2
(ppm)
(gpm)
(ppm)
(qpm)
(gpm)
(ppm)
Reserved
Reserved
Reserved
Reserved
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide Oxides of
Composite Phase
2 Composite Phase
2 Composite
Reserved
Nitrogen
Phase
2
(gpm)
(gpm)
(ppm)
(gpm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
0.50
13.0
10.0
Reserved
0.50
15.0
12.0
2.0
Reserved
1.00
40.0
32.0
Reserved
1.00
400
32.0
j.~
Reserved
2.00
70.0
56.0
j~
Reserved
Tier
1
(1994+)
(?5750 LVW)
(5750
LVW)
1988—1995
1984—1987
198 1—1983
0.80
0.80
1.60
1.60
3.40
(Source:
Added at
)
Ill. Reg.
________
,
effective
23
IT
IS
SO
ORDERED
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby
certify
that
the
above
opinion
~nd
order
was
adopted
on
the
________________
day
of
£uI~~L~
1994,
by
a vote of
~—O
/7
~
/~
Dorothy
M.
G~4~n,Clerk
Illinois
Po(Zution
Control
Board
