ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

January

26,

1995

IN THE MATTER OF:

)

15

ROP

PLAN

 CONTROL

MEASURES

)

FOR VOM EMISSIONS-PART IV:

)

TIGHTENING SURFACE COATING

)

STANDARDS; SURFACE COATING OF

)

AUTOMOTIVE\TRANSPORTATION AND

)

BUSINESS MACHINE PLASTIC PARTS;

)

 R94-21

WOOD FURNITURE COATING; REACTOR

)

 (Rulemaking)

PROCESSES AND DISTILLATION

)

OPERATION PROCESSES IN SOeMI;

)

AND BAKERY OVENS; AMENDMENTS TO

)

35

ILL.

ADM.

CODE

PARTS

211,

)

218

AND

219

)

Proposed

Rule.

Second

Notice.

OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD

 (by G.

 P. Girard):

On September 12,

 1994,

 the Illinois Environmental Protection

Agency

 (Agency)

 filed this proposal for rulemaking.

 Section

182 (b) (1)

 of the Clean Air Act

(CAA),

as amended in 1990,

requires all moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas to

 achieve a 15

 reduction of 1990 emissions of volatile organic

material

 (VOM) by 1996.

 In Illinois, the Chicago and Metro-East

St. Louis

 (Metro—East)

 areas are classified as “severe” and

“moderate” nonattainment for ozone, respectively, and as such are

subject to the 15

 reduction requirement.

 Also pursuant to

Section 182(b) of the

CAA~

Illinois is to submit a 15

 Rate of

Progress Plan

 (ROP) within three years of the enactment of the

CAA

amendments.

 This rulemaking represents Part IV of the rules

proposed in Illinois’

15

 ROP plan.’

The Board’s responsibility in this matter arises from the

Environmental Protection Act

 (Act)

 (415 ILCS 5/1 et seq.

 (1992)).

The Board is charged therein to “determine,

 define and implement

the environmental control standards applicable in the State of

Illinois”

 (415 ILCS 5/5(b)).

 More generally, the Board’s

rulemaking charge is based on the system of checks and balances

integral to Illinois environmental governance:

 the Board bears

responsibility for the rulemaking and principal adjudicatory

functions; the Agency has primary responsibility for

 See R94-12, In the Matter of 15

 ROP Plan Control

Measures for VOM Emissions

 Part I, R94-15, In the Matter of 15

ROP

 Plan Control Measures for VON Emissions

—

 Part II, and R94—

16, In the Matter of 15

 ROP Plan Control Measures for VON

Emissions

—

 Part III.

2

administration of the Act and the Board’s regulations.

The

latter includes administration of today’s new regulation.

The proposal includes several measures for reduction of

VON in various coating operations.

 Specifically,

 lower limits

for VON content of coatings applied to the following categories

are proposed:

 can, paper, coil, fabric,

 vinyl, metal furniture

coatings, baked large appliance coatings and miscellaneous parts

and products.

 The proposal also includes amendments requiring

automotive\transportation and business machine plastic parts

coating sources to meet specific pound per gallon VON limitations

for coating operations which exceed the applicability threshold

set forth in the rule or which emit more than 15 pounds per day

of VON.

 Finally, the proposal tightens the applicability levels

(from 100 tons per year to 25 tons per year)

 for wood furniture

coating operations.

The proposal also includes provisions regulating synthetic

organic chemical manufacturing industry (SOCMI)

 distillation and

reactor processes and bakery oven VON emissions.

 SOCNI processes

regulated by this proposal will be required to apply control

 technology to certain process vents which demonstrates 98

reduction of VON emissions or reduces VOM to 20 parts per million

by volume on a dry basis corrected to 3

 oxygen.

This proposal was filed pursuant to Section 28.5 of the Act

and was accepted for hearing.

 Pursuant to the provisions of that

section the Board is required to proceed within set time—frames

toward the adoption of this regulation.

 The Board has no

discretion to adjust these time-frames under any circumstances.

Today the Board acts to send this proposal to second notice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 15,

 1994, the Board sent this proposal to first

notice under the

APA

without commenting on the merits of the

proposal.

 The proposal was published in the Illinois Register on

October 14, 1994 at 18 Ill. Reg. 15192

 (Part 211),

 18 Ill. Reg.

15211

 (Part 218), and 18 Ill. Reg. 15274

 (Part 219).

 Hearings

were held on November

4,

 1994, December 2,

 1994 and December 16,

1994,

 in Chicago, Illinois before hearing officer Marie Tipsord.

The comment period closed on January 4,

 1995 and the Board

received 16 comments which are discussed in detail below.

On January 5,

 1995, the Board received the Agency’s final

comments and a motion to correct transcript.

 The Board grants

the motion to correct the transcript.

PROPOSAL

Section 182(b) (1) of the

CAA,

as amended in 1990, requires

all moderate and above ozone nonattainmerit areas to achieve a 15

3

reduction of 1990 emissions of VON by 1996.

 This rulemaking is

Phase

 4 of Illinois’ 15

 ROP plan to achieve that reduction.

The

proposal represents a group of measures which are presented to

reduce VOM emissions in the Metro-East area (moderate

nonattainment)

 and the Chicago area (severe nonattaimuent).

As discussed above, the proposal includes four processes to

be controlled.

 Those four types are:

1.

 Coating of Automotive/Transportation and Business

Machine Plastic Parts

2.

 Wood Furniture Coating

3.

 Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry

(SOCMI) Distillation and Reactor Processes

4.

 Bakery Ovens

 (Prop. at

5_8)2

In addition, the Agency has proposed minor Reasonably Available

Control Technology

 (RACT) revisions in this proceeding.

 (Prop.

at 8.)

Coatincr Operations

The proposal would tighten the existing VON content

limitations for over 300 potentially affected sources, the

majority of which are in the Chicago area.

 (Prop. at 5-6.)

The

categories of coatings which are affected by the proposal include

“can, paper, coil,

 fabric, vinyl, metal furniture, baked large

 appliances and miscellaneous metal parts and products”.

 (Prop.

at 6.)

 The Agency expects the proposed control measures to

reduce the VON emissions in the Chicago area by 10.16 tons per

day

 (TPD)

 and 0.39 TPD in the Metro-East area.

The proposal also adds a new method for compliance known as

cross—line averaging.

 (Prop. at 6.)

 Cross—line averaging will

allow a source to demonstrate, using mathematical equations, that

the aggregate of all emissions from all coating lines is less

than the daily allowable VON emissions from the same group of

lines.

 (Prop.

 at 10.)

With regard to the technical feasibility and economic

reasonableness of the proposal, the Agency contracted for the

services of Science Application International Corporation

 (SAIC),

an engineering consulting firm,

 to assess the technical

feasibility and economic reasonableness of the proposed

 The statement of reasons filed by the Agency will be

cited as “Prop. at

_“;

 public comments will be cited as “P.C.

at

_“;

 the transcript will be cited as “Tr. at

_“;

 prefiled

testimony will be cited as

“Exh.

at

_“;

 and attachments to the

Agency’s proposal will be cited as “Attach.

—

at

“.

4

amendments to the VON content limitations for coatings.

 (Prop.

at 17.)

 SAIC found that the existing coating standards were

being met by sources through the use of coatings which had a VON

content that was only 77 percent of the current allowable VON

limit.

 (Id.)

 The Agency also notes that the technical

feasibility of the proposed amended VON content limitations for

coatings is also being demonstrated by sources subject to the VOM

content limitations in California’s South Coast Air Quality

Management District (“South Coast”).

 (~g:

 South Coast Air

Quality Management District, Rules and Requlations, Tit. IX,

Sl107

 (1992); Attach.

 17(b) (10).)

The general cost effectiveness of alternative control

options under this proposal vary depending on the size of the

source.

 (Prop. at 17—18.)

 For control by means of waterborne

coatings, SAIC estimates that costs range from $310 to $680 per

ton of VOM reduced and for high solids coatings, SAIC estimates

that costs range from $650 to $1,560 per ton of VON reduced.

(Prop. at 18.)

 Finally, for add—on controls, SAIC estimates that

costs range from $3,450 to $12,570 per ton of VON reduced.

 (Id.)

Coating of Automotive/Transportation and Business Machine Plastic

Parts

The proposal amends the coating requirements applicable to

seven potentially affected sources, all in the Chicago area, with

coating operations for interior and exterior plastic parts for

automotive or other transportation equipment.

 Such equipment

includes trucks (light-, medium-, or heavy—duty); construction

equipment; vans; buses; tractors; lawninowers and other mobile

equipment intended for primary use on land; and housing and

exterior plastic parts for business and commercial machines,

including, but not limited to, computers, monitors, printers,

facsimile machines, microfiche readers, copy machines, cellular

and standard phones, typewriters, pencil sharpeners, medical

equipment,

 and entertainment equipment.

 (Prop. at 6.)

 This

proposal excludes coating operations for plastic parts coated on

the main

 (body) paint line in automobile and light duty truck

assembly plants; coating operations for plastic parts coated

during refinishing of automobile,

 trucks, tractors,

 lawnmowers

and other mobile equipment; watercraft and aircraft; and internal

electrical components of business machines.

 (Prop. at 6.)

These control measures are expected to reduce 1996 VON

emissions by 0.28 TPD in Chicago, according to the Agency.

(Prop. at 11)

 The cost-effectiveness of lower VON content

coatings for Automotive/Transportation plastic parts are $606—668

per ton of VON reduced and the cost—effectiveness of lower VON

content coatings for Business Machine plastic parts are $470-480

per ton of VOM reduced.

 (Prop. at 18.)

 Add-on thermal

 incineration systems are an option that can be used to control

VON emissions instead of lower VOM content surface coatings and

5

the costs vary depending on the plant size and volume of coating

required.

 (Id.)

Wood Furniture Coating

This proposal includes amendments which will potentially

affect 19 facilities which have wood coating operations, all in

the Chicago area.

 (Prop. at 7.)

 Specifically, the Agency is

proposing to modify the applicability section to lower the

threshold from 100 tons per year of maximum theoretical emissions

to 25 tons per year potential to emit.

 (Prop. at 7.)

 In effect,

then, the proposal is tightening the applicability of the wood

coating provisions; however, the Agency does not believe that the

proposed amendments will reduce VOM emissions.

 (Prop. at 12.)

Rather, the Agency believes this provision is important to insure

that no increase in VON emissions occurs.

 (Prop. at 12.)

The technology for controlling VOM emissions from wood

furniture coating operations through add—on controls is

available, and includes thermal or catalytic incinerators and

adsorption devices.

 (Prop. at 19.)

 The cost estimates below

represent sources that emit from 50 TPY to 500 TPY of VON.

 (Id.)

The capital costs for control devices range from $446,400 to

$8,115,600 while the operating costs for catalytic incinerators

 range from $170,700 to $3,439,500 annually.

 (Id.)

 These costs

are based on a scheme where a single control device controls all

VON emissions from the source.

 (Id.)

 An enclosure over the

entire finishing line may be required for most wood furniture

coating sources to use a single control device with a capital

cost of range from $10,000 to $100,000, depending on the size of

the facility.

 (Prop. at 19—20.)

SOCNI

The Agency has identified

 2 sources which are potentially

affected by these proposed amendments.

 One facility is in the

Chicago area and the second is in the Metro—East area.

specifically, the proposal would apply to facilities that have

continuous chemical manufacturing process units that produce as a

primary product chemicals set forth in Appendix A of Parts 218

and 219.

 (Prop. at 7.)

Excluded from the applicability of this proposal are:

(1)

reactor processes or distillation operations that are designed

and operated in batch mode;

 (2) reactor processes or distillation

operations that are part of a polymer manufacturing operation;

(3) reactor processes or distillation operations in a process

unit with a total design capacity of less than 1,100 tons per

year for all chemicals produced within that unit;

 (4) any vent

stream with a flow rate less than 0.0085 scm/mm

 or total VON

concentration of less than 500 ppmv; or

 (5) any reactor or

 distillation unit included within an Early Reduction Program

6

approved by USEPA.

 (Prop. at 12.)

 Under the proposal,

applicability for all non-exempt process vents will be determined

by a total resource effectiveness

 (“TRE”) index calculation.

A

TRE index value of 1.0 or less subjects that process vent to the

control requirements in this rulemaking.

 (Id.)

The control requirements of this proposal recommend a

presumptive norm for

RACT

of 98 percent reduction of VON

emissions or 20 ppmv, on a dry basis, corrected to

 3 percent

oxygen, emission limit for affected vent stream(s).

 (Prop. at

12—13.)

 No vent stream with an existing combustion device is

required

 to meet the 98 percent reduction requirement or 20 ppmv

emission limit until the combustion device is replaced.

 (Prop.

at 13.)

This proposal is based on USEPA’s control technology

guideline (CTG) for controlling VON process vent emissions from

SOCMI reactor processes and distillation operation, which was

formally announced on November 15,

 1993.

 (~g58 FR 60197,

November 15,

 1993;

 Prop.

 at 13.)

 According to the Agency, this

measure is not expected to reduce VON emissions in either the

Chicago or the Metro—East nonattainment area; rather, this

measure is proposed in accordance with the State’s obligation to

 adopt regulations implementing

RACT,

as promulgated by USEPA

under Section 182(b) (2) (A) of the CAA.

 (Prop. at 13.)

Combustion is the primary control method used for VON

emissions reduction for these processes.

 Control options

include, but are not limited to, boilers,

 flares, afterburners,

or recovery.

 USEPA estimates indicate that the cost

effectiveness of controlling VON emissions from SOCMI

distillation and reactor processes ranges from $241 to $21,000

per ton of VON reduced.

 (Prop. at 20.)

 The highest cost

effectiveness is for low—flow and low—heat value sources

processing halogenated hydrocarbons.

 An analysis prepared by the

State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators and

Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials

(STAPPA/ALA.PCO)

 indicates that the corresponding maximum cost of

control, for CTG exempt sources with a TRE index greater than

1.0,

 is approximately $2,300 per ton

 (Id.)

Bakery Ovens

The proposal regulates bakery ovens for the first time.

Bakery ovens are defined as ovens which bake yeast—leavened bread

products.

 The source must have a potential to emit 25 tons per

year before it is subject to the requirements.

 However, the

proposal excludes ovens which are used to bake for on—site

consumption or on—site retail sale.

 (Prop. at 13.)

The proposal requires emission controls that achieve an

 overall efficiency of 81

 reduction in VON from bakery ovens.

7

(Prop. at 13.)

 This level includes VON emissions from all

emission units at the source.

 (Id.)

 Sources with VON emissions

limits below the applicability threshold of 25 tons per year are

required by this proposal to maintain records to establish their

annual emissions level and to certify that they are exempt from

the control requirements.

 (Prop.

 at 13-14.)

The proposal states:

Afterburners, such as catalytic oxidizers or regenerative

oxidizers, are the most effective devices for controlling

VOM emissions from bakery ovens.

 Catalytic oxidizers have

been used successfully at numerous bakeries in other states.

The costs vary depending on the age and size of the oven,

and the

number of

exhaust streams that must be routed to the

control device.

 Capital costs range from $84,000 to

$205,000 for catalytic oxidizers and from $197,000 to

$295,000 for regenerative oxidizers.

 Annual operating costs

range from $36,000 to $72,000 for catalytic oxidizers and

from $72,000 to $115,000 for regenerative oxidizers.

(~:

Item 16(e)

 of the Table of Contents.)

 (Prop. at 20—21.)

Minor RACT Amendments to Parts 218 and 219

The proposal amends Sections 219.926, 219.946, 219.966 and

219.986 dealing with permitting issues that have the potential to

affect many facilities.

 (Prop. at 8.)

 specifically, the

proposal adds the word “equivalent” to these sections before any

reference to an alternative control plan.

 The proposal also

amends Section 218.980 and 219.980 to add polyethylene foam

packaging as a category of packaging not subject to the control

requirements in Sections 218.986 and 219.986.

 The proposal also

corrects a list of criteria by which a source determines if it is

able to fill aerosol cans by the “through—the—valve” method,

making it clear that satisfaction of any single criterion would

not require a source to fill aerosol cans through this method,

and the source may use another filling method.

 (Id.)

The

amendment to Section 218.966(c) adds the inadvertently omitted

compliance date of March 15,

 1995, to that subsection, and

affects non—SOCMI sources

 (i.e. miscellaneous organic chemical

manufacturing processes) with leaks in the Chicago ozone

nonattainment.

 (Id.)

The amendments to Section 218.106(e) affect coating

operations on electromotive diesels in Cook County, Illinois

setting forth the date for compliance with the VON content limits

for coatings applied in this category, consistent with USEPA’s

settlement in the litigation concerning the Federal

Implementation Plan

 55 FR 26814, June 29,

 1990.)

The Agency has not identified any potential sources in the

 Metro—East area and so anticipates no reduction in VON emissions

8

for that area.

 In the Chicago area, the Agency expects the

control of VON emissions will result in a 0.98 TPD reduction in

the Chicago area.

TESTIMONY

AND

COMMENTS

As stated previously, the Board received 16 public comments

on this rulemaking.

 Comments were received from the following:

1.

 Linda Brand, Manager of Regulatory Flexibility Unit,

Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affair

2.

 Dietzgen Corporation submitted by Beth A.

 Caylor,

Environmental Affairs Manager

3.

 Connie Bradway, Administrative Code Division, Secretary

of State

4.

 Interstate Brands Corporation submitted by Robert E.

Stine

5.

V.

 3. Dolan

 & Co. by Stepen 3. Dolan

6.

 City of Chicago by Henry L. Henderson,

 Commissioner,

Department of Environment

7.

 USEPA by Stephen Rothblatt,

 Chief, Regulation

Development Branch

8.

 American Bakers Association submitted by Anne G.

Giesecke,

 Ph.D.

9.

 Interstate Brands Corporation submitted by Robert E.

Stine, Attorney

10.

 Kraft General Foods submitted by Peggy L. Martin,

Director, State Government Affairs and Deborah A.

Becker, Vice President, Environmental Policy

11.

 Harris Marcus Group by Jeffrey C. Fort

12.

 Stepan Company submitted by Patricia F. Sharkey

13.

 Illinois Environmental Regulatory Group submitted by

Whitney Wagner Rosen

14.

 Outboard Marine Corporation submitted by Naribeth

Flowers

15.

 S & C Electric Company submitted by Kathleen Hodge

9

16.

 Agency comments submitted by Bonnie Sawyer, Shelia

Kolbe and Kyle Davis, Assistant Counsels, Legal

Division

In addition, several individuals testified at the Board’s

December 2,

 1994, hearing including:

Deborah Becker for Kraft General Foods;

Dr. Anne Giesecke for American Bakers Association;

Mark Biel for Chemical Industry Council;

Gordon Nelson for Harris Marcus Group;

Greg Miller for Solar Corporation;

Elizabeth Steinhour for Illinois Environmental Regulatory

Group;

Robert Sullivan for S

 & C Electric.

The discussion that follows will be organized by subject

matter and where possible by the public comment number.

 We will

begin by discussing the testimony received at the December 2,

1994 hearing which was not followed by a public comment.

 We will

then discuss the comments received.

PAINT

AND

COATING INDUSTRY

MANUFACTURERS

Chemical Industry Council

Mr. Mark Biel testified on behalf of the Chemical Industry

 Council

 (Council) at the Board’s December 2,

 1994, hearing.

Mr.

Biel testified that implementation of a portion of these rules

would have a “dramatically negative effect on the paint and

coating industry manufacturers and, more importantly, their

customers and be at odds with state and federal requirements

relating to establishing VON emission control technologies for

existing surface coating processes.”

 (Exh.

 20 at 1—2.)

Specifically Mr. Biel made the following points:

1.

 The Agency’s reliance upon southern California’s

coating industry and coating regulations as a technical

basis for emission limits set forth in this proposal is

inappropriate because the feasibility of applying lower

VON coatings that comply in southern California is

heavily dependent upon the existence of drier and

warmer weather conditions.

 Also the emission limits

set forth in the southern California regulations go

beyond RACT and, in fact, rely upon future advanced

technology which is not currently available.

10

2.

 Certain emission limits set forth in the Agency’s

proposal are technology forcing,

 and, therefore, go

beyond the

RACT

threshold allowed by the

CAA

to meet

the 15

 ROP plan control measures for VON emissions in

non—extreme areas of the country.

3.

 The 2.2 lbs./gal. emission limit set forth in Subpart

F, Section 218.204(b) (1) of the proposal cannot be met

by certain manufacturers of sheet basecoat and

overvarnish for can coating using current technology.

4.

 The 1.7 lbs./gal. emission limit set forth in Subpart

F, Section 218.204(d)

 of the proposal goes well beyond

RACT

and may be economically and technologically

infeasible with current add—on control technologies.

5.

 The 2.3 lbs./gal. emission limit set forth in Subpart

F, Section 218.204(g) (2)

 of the proposal for baked

coatings applied to metal furniture will cause

substantial reductions in the quality and performance

of these coatings which will make them unusable for

many applications in this category.

6.

 The 3.0 lbs./gal. emission limit set forth in Subpart

F, Section 218

•

204

(j)

(2) (B)

 of the proposal for baked

extreme performance coatings applied to miscellaneous

metal parts and products will extremely limit

applicability of these coatings due to reductions in

viscosity, non—uniform film thickness and curing

problems.

 Reductions in spread rates of these coatings

at the proposed VON levels would also likely decrease

productivity tremendously.

7.

 The 2.8 lbs./gal. emission limit set forth in Subpart

F, Section 218.204(j) (4) (A) of the proposal for air

dried coatings applied to miscellaneous metal parts and

 products cannot be met for the majority of applications

with current technology.

 Reductions in spread rates of

these coatings at the proposed VON levels would also

likely decrease productivity tremendously.

8.

 The 2.3 lbs/gal. emission limit set forth in Subpart F,

Section 218.204(j) (4) (B) of the proposal for baked

coatings applied to miscellaneous metal parts and

products cannot be met with current technology.

Reductions in spread rates of these coatings at the

proposed VOM levels would also likely decrease

productivity tremendously.

11

Agency Response to Council

The Agency and the Council have reached agreement on

proposed changes to the rulemaking and are recommending those

changes to the Board.

 (P.C. 16 at 4.)

 Specifically, changes are

being recommended for Sections 218/219.204(j) (2) and

218/219.204(j) (4), new subsections 218.204(j) (6) and (7), and

219.204

(j)

(5)

and

(j)

(6).

 (P. C

•

 16 at 4.)

 The recommendation

for change would raise the VON emission limit for extreme

performance coatings from 3.0 lb/gal as proposed to 3.3 lb/gal.

All other air dried coatings will also have a limit of 3.3 lb/gal.

and baked coatings will be limited to 2.8 lb/gal rather than 2.3

lb/gal.

 (Id.)

 The Agency also recommends adding a definition

 for “Metallic Coating” with limits for this category at 3.5

lb/gal for air dried and 3.0 lb/gal for baked coatings.

 (Id.)

Board Action

The Board accepts the recommendations for amendments as

proposed by the Council and the Agency.

 Sections

218/219.204(j) (2)

 and 218/219.204(j) (4) new subsections

218.204(j) (6) and

 (7) and 219.204(j) (5)

and

 (j)(6) will be

amended to read as follows:

Section 218.204

j)

 Miscellaneous Metal Parts and

Products Coating

1)

 Clear coating

 0.52

 (4.3)

0.52*

______

Air—dried coating

u.~

 (3.5)

~-~)

Extreme performance

coating

A)

 Air dried

B)

 Baked

4~)

 Steel pail and drum

interior coating

&j)

 All other coatings

~j

 Air Dried

~j.

 Baked

0.42

 (3.5)

0.42

 (3.5)

0.42*

 (3.5)

0.42

 (3.5)

~M!~:.

‘~~

*

t4.~~)

0.52*

 (4.3)*

0.36

(3.0)

(..~

•~

~

0.36

 (3.0)

k~,f~*

______

~•

~

~:

~

.~.

 ~.a::..

~

~

:..~Lc~J~Lflg

 a.~,p1led

Via

~J~~.p1.LQr

u~&ycoatinc~,

for

the.

f

:::~:.

~irc;

cc•rro~ior~

::~-sistance.

 m~r.~:

:trLjc~.i_charoe~re

applied

the

~t~t~~c_1

~t4~g~

The

cçzt~:—..

~ttr~ctc~d

th~.

substrate

due

thE

ro

c

pot

nt ial

ere

nc

t~c~.escf

 b~ct

cn_~1L.4EL.g~:

hi~J~c-ticn,

 ~~re~e

 performance

-rc.tectiveL.deccr~tiveorfunctj Qfl

ci~t~j.ig aprdie~

 ~n~e*•g~i•~-

h~t

pc~L~i~c~

~t~E S~ctlor~.

 eta.,i~ic

ccatlng” means

a

1./4

1b/~I

~Et.

t-artiei~~

~p~_ied..

::cc~E .~.a

:~:-

~4)

 All other coatinas

~j

Air

Dried

~

Baked

~

 ~etal1ic.~coati~

~..

_____

aPp~Lied.

0.42

 (3.5)

~3.

_____

 0.36

 (3.0)

iii

~

Q.~AZ

 (3.5.~

0.42*

______

_____

O,3G

(3.0~

q~tZZP~iiU~I~c

~

means

cc?n~n~c~.c_tban_114,L~LajJ...jp.ar~

SOLAR

CORPORATION

Mr.

Greg

Miller

testified

behalf

the

Solar

Corporation

the

Board’s

December

2,

1994

hearing.

Mr.

Miller

explained

that Solar

~5

“job

shop”

making

custom—made,

painted—

and

fabric— covered plastic decorative components for original

equipment

manufacturers

home

entertainment

and

automotive

 industries.

 (Exh.

27

at

1.)

 Solar does not specify the types of

coating applied to its product lines,

 according to Mr. Miller.

(Id.)

 Further, due to the nature of the products manufactured,

there are wide swings

 in production and overlapping business

cycles which make record keeping and production planning

difficult.

 (Id.)

Mr. Miller testified that Solar,

 which

is

located

Libertyville,

 Illinois, anticipates that all its coatings, with

the exception of two, will comply with the proposed VOM

limitations.

 (Exh~

27

at

2.)

Those

two

exceptions

are

adhesion primer used to coat automotive plastic parts made from

polyolefifliC, polyvinyl chloride or polyaniide—based plastics and

a metal flake coating~

 (Id.)

Solar has been in contact with the Agency to discuss

alternatives and was provided with a copy of the Alternative

control

Techniques

Guidance

Document

which

formed

 the basis for

Air

dried

0.42

(3.5)

0.42*

______

B)

 Baked

 0.42

(3.5.~

14

the proposed emission limits.

 (Exh. 27 at 4.)

 Mr. Miller

states:

While that document does indicate that there are compliant

adhesion primers for use with sheet molded plastics, those

plastics are physically and chemically different than the

plastics Solar applies adhesion primers to prior to

painting.

 Solar uses, among others, high impact styrenes,

polycarbonates, ABS, Noryl and polyamides.

 As different

plastics have different physical compositions, so do they

also have different chemical compositions.

 Different

reactions,

 therefore, will occur between different plastics

and the solvents in different coatings.

 Consequently,

it

does not follow that simply because one adhesion primer

formulated for one plastic will react in the same way with

another plastic.

 (sic

(Exh. 27 at 4.)

Mr. Miller asks that the Board consider amending the

proposal to include a specific category and limit for adhesion

primers used to coat automotive plastic parts made from

polyolefinic, polyvinyl chloride or polyamide—based plastic

parts.

 (Exh.

 27 at 5.)

 Mr. Miller asserts that since USEPA

“apparently did not consider the use of adhesion primers to coat

polyolefinic, polyvinyl chloride or polyamide-based plastic

parts” the request for amendment to the Board is warranted.

(Id.)

 Solar suggests the following language to be added to

 Sections 218/219.204:

~j

 Plastic Parts Coating:

 Automotive/Transportation

kg/l

 lb/gal

***

~

 Specialty

F)

 Adhesion primers used to coat

polyolefinic, polyvinyl

chloride or polyamide plastic

parts

 .85*

 (7.l)*

Metal

flake

coat

•79*

(6.5)*

(Id.)

Agency Response to Solar

The Agency in its final comments indicated that after the

December 2,

 1994, hearing in this proceeding, the Agency

contacted USEPA regarding the issues raised by Solar.

 According

to the Agency, USEPA does not believe that the information

provided by Solar at the second hearing supports the need for

15

separate categories for these types of coatings.

 (P.C.

 16 at

23.)

 “USEPA believes that compliant coatings are available.”

(Id.)

 The Agency contacted several manufacturers of paints and

coatings all of which stated that there are adhesion primers

available which meet the proposed levels.

 (Id.)

Board Action

The Board will not adopt the changes suggested by Solar at

this time.

 The Board notes that the Agency does not fully

address several of the concerns raised by Solar,

 In fact, the

Agency has reiterated the economic and technical support for the

 proposal without addressing the specifics of Solar’s operation.

However, Solar also fails to give sufficient technical and

economic support for a general rulemaking change.

 Solar might

wish to examine the possibility of a site-specific rulemaking or

adjusted standard for its facility on this issue.

CAN

 COATING OPERATIONS

Agency Response to Comments of United States Can Company

The Agency indicated that,

 in response to questions

presented at the November 4,

 1994,

 hearing, the Agency reexamined

the proposed limits for overvarnish coatings used in three—piece

can coating operations.

 (P.C.

 16 at 8.)

 After reviewing the

limit, the Agency recommends that the proposal be amended to

retain the current limit for overvarnish while lowering the

basecoat limits.

 (P.C. 16 at 8—9.)

Board Action

The Board will accept the recommendation and amend the

proposal at Sections 218.204(b) (1) and 219.204(b) (1) to read:

Section 218/219.204 Emission Limitations

b)

 Can Coating

 kg/l

 lb/gal

1)

 Sheet basecoat and

overvarnish

 0.34

 (2.S)

J~L

 ~heet basecoat

 p 34~

•

S

0.25*

(2.2~*

GENERAL

PUBLIC

COMMENTS

16

DCCA

 (P.C.

 1) and Secretary of State

 (P.C.

3)

The first comment was filed by the Illinois Department of

Commerce and Community Affairs which indicated that the rule

would not significantly impact small business.

 (P.C.

1.)

A

comment was also received from the Secretary of State

Administrative Code Division which indicated minor changes

necessary for codification purposes.

 (P.C.

3.)

 Those changes

have been made in the proposed second notice.

Dietzgen Corporation

 (P.C.

2)

Dietzgen Corporation’s comment centers around the use of

USEPA test Method 24 for determining the VON content of water-

based paper coating formulas used by Dietzgen.

 (P.C.

2

 at 1.)

Dietzgen is concerned that the Method 24 analysis is inaccurate

and that use of Method 24 will not give a correct VOM level.

Dietzgen indicates that it will continue to seek alternatives and

welcome suggestions on the approach it has taken.

 (Id.)

V.

 J. Dolan

 & Co..

 Inc.

 (P.C.

5)

V.

 J. Dolan & Co. comments that,

 as a coatings manufacturer,

the proposed limits set forth for “Miscellaneous Metal Parts

&

Products Coating’ are not feasible for a large number of coating

users in the Greater Chicago area.”

 (P.C.

5.)

 The comment

 “strongly” urges the Board to reconsider these limits and allow

for limits which are “both realistic and achievable”.

 (Id.)

Henry L.

 Henderson.

 Commissioner, Chicago DeDartment of

Environment (CDOE)

 (P.C.

6)

Mr. Henderson states that “CDOE supports the goals of this

rulemaking and urges the State to allow implementation in the

most flexible and cost effective manner as possible.”

(P.

C.

6

at 2.)

 Specifically, CDOE supports interfacility trading and

seasonality components which would allow flexibility to meet the

lower VON emissions requirements.

 (Id.)

 CDOE also supports the

use of cross—line averaging.

 (Id.)

Agency Response to Dietzgen Corporation. Dolan and CDOE

The Agency did not specifically respond to each of these

comments.

 However, the Agency’s comments in general do address

the issues raised by the above mentioned commentors.

Board Action

No formal Board action is necessary to address these

concerns.

17

BAKERY

OVENS

United States Environmental Protection Agency

 (USEPA)

 (P.C.

7)

The USEPA provided specific comment on the proposal for

bakery ovens.

 The USEPA has issued an “Alternative Control

Technique (ACT)” for bakery oven emissions.

 (P.C.

7.)

 The TJSEPA

indicates:

The ACT states that control efficiencies on ovens of 95

percent could be achieved at a reasonable cost using

catalytic oxidation.

 The USEPA is aware that in some States

bakeries have achieved reductions of 90 percent or more and

have not reported any problems in instituting a level of

control to achieve this.

 Based in part on this information,

the USEPA believes that reasonably available control of VON

emission from bakery ovens is from 80 percent to 95 percent.

Illinois’ proposed regulations which require 81 percent

control of VOM emissions from bakery ovens reflects USEPA’s

intent.

 (P.C.

7.)

Interstate Brands Corporation

 (Interstate)

 (P.C.

 4 and 9)

Interstate Brands Corporation supported the comments made by

the American Bakers Association

 (described below)

 and also

initially commented that it urges:

an option be included to allow facilities to have a choice

to either control the total non—exempt emission units to the

percent reduction specified in the regulation or control all

non—exempt emission units to below 25 tons per year in

actual emissions as an alternative to the percent of control

level suggested.

 (P.C.

 4 at 1.)

Additionally, Interstate Brands Corporation asked that the

applicability section be more clearly worded and noted that the

recordkeeping requirements as proposed were unduly burdensome.

 (Id.)

Interstate Brands Corporation states in its final comments

that it urges an exemption of all ovens with less than 15 tons

per year of actual emissions in all baking facilities.

 (P.C.

9

at 1.)

 Interstate Brands Corporation also states that it no

longer objects to the recordkeeping requirements after further

explanation of the requirements by the Agency.

 (Id.)

American Bakers Association

 (P.C.

8)

Dr. Ann Giesecke testified at the December

2,

 1994, hearing

on behalf of the American Bakers Association (Association).

In

addition, several bakers from the Chicago area were present to

show support for the Association’s position as well as being

18

available to answer questions.

 (Tr. at 136—140.)

 Dr. Giesecke

testified that bakers would like to do their part to see the

state reach the 15 percent goal; however, he asserted that the

industry must also be able to maintain economic viability.

 (Tr.

at 142—143.)

Dr. Giesecke points out that the bakery oven proposal is

regulating the emissions of “ethanol, a non—toxic low reactive,

natural by—product of yeast fermentation that was captured under

the definition of VON because of the oxygen molecule.”

 (Tr. at

143.)

 Dr. Giesecke further states that “there is minimal public

benefit and risk analysis benefit to eliminating ethanol

 emissions from the atmosphere.”

 (Id.)

 Dr. Giesecke requests

that the Chicago area have a 15 ton per year exemption rather

than 10 ton per year.

 (Id.)

 The cost differential for the

bakers in dollars per ton is “$8,000 per ton at the 15 ton level,

$14,000 per ton at the 10 ton level”.

 (Tr. at 143.)

The Association

 in its final comments again requests that

the rule apply only to major sources,

 i.e.

 “sources with actual

emissions of 25 tons per year of VON in the Chicago area and

sources with actual emissions of 100 tons per year in the St.

Louis area.”

 (P.C.

 8 at 1.)

 The Association suggests the

“definition of potential to emit be qualified to apply after

control equipment has limited emissions.”

 (P.C.

 8 at 2.)

The Association also agrees with the exemption for low

emitting ovens and suggests that a 60 percent reduction

requirement is reasonable when actual emissions are less than 100

tons per year.

 (P.C.

 8 at 2.)

Kraft General Foods

 (P.C.

10)

Deborah Becker testified on behalf of Kraft General Foods

(Kraft) at the December 2,

 1994, hearing.

 Ms. Becker testified

concerning the control requirements and the emissions monitoring

requirements.

 (Tr. at 126.)

 Specifically, Ms. Becker made four

recommendations in the area of control requirements to help

address cost—effectiveness.

 (Tr. at 125—129.)

 First,

 Ms. Becker

recommends that an exemption be included for small emitting ovens

with actual emissions of less than 15 tons per year.

 (Tr. at

127.)

 Next,

 Ms. Becker recommends implementation of the emission

reduction requirement on a facility wide basis rather than on an

oven—by—oven basis.

 (Id.)

 Thirdly, Ms. Becker suggests

establishing a facility—wide reduction of VON at a 60 percent

level rather than 81 percent.

 (Tr. at 128.)

 Finally, Ms. Becker

recommends providing for innovative use of technology which would

encourage innovation in reducing emissions.

 (Pr. at 128—129.)

Ms. Becker also testified that as an alternative to the

continuous monitoring requirement, that compliance be verified

through calculation using the USEPA’s formula contained the ACT

document.

 (Tr. at 130; Attach. 25.)

19

Kraft’s final comments reiterate the position that

applicability of the VON emission rates should be based on

actual, rather than potential emissions, as well as the position

that the reduction should be 60 percent facility-wide.

 Kraft

states that it is “encouraged by the willingness of the state to

address the need for flexibility for Illinois bakeries to meet

the requirements of the regulation.”

 (P.C.

 10 at 1.)

 Kraft also

indicates support for the exemption of ovens which emit less than

 15 tons per year.

 (P.C. at 2.)

Agency Response to Bakeries

The Agency, in its final comments, has grouped its response

to the bakeries and states that:

The Agency believes that this proposal represents a

reasonable balance between the concerns of this industry and

Illinois’ need to reduce VOM emission in the State’s

nonattainjuents.

 (P.C.

 16 at 25.)

Specifically, the Agency has agreed to request that the Board

amend the proposal to “extend the exemption to individual ovens

with actual emissions of 15 TPY or less, provided that total

emissions from all exempt ovens never exceed 25 TPY.”

 (P.C.

16

at 28.)

 In addition the Agency recommends “allowing for an

extended period of time for bakeries with emissions in the range

of 25 to 100 TPY to comply with the proposed control

requirements”.

 (P.C.

 16 at 31.)

 Finally, the Agency is

recommending that the testing portion of the proposal be amended

to allow sources additional time to submit requested test results

to the Agency.

 (P.C.

 16 at 33.)

The Agency, in response to comments regarding actual

emissions versus potential to emit, noted that USEPA determines

that a source is a major source based on the potential to emit

rather than actual emissions.

 (P.C.

 16 at 26.)

 A bakery may

limit its potential to emit through permit conditions to avoid

the applicability of the rule; however, any change in the

 definition of potential to emit or major source must come from

USEPA.

 (P.C.

 16 at 27.)

 The Agency also states that the

proposed rule allows flexibility to bakeries for alternative

control as long as the overall emissions reduction goal is

achieved.

 (P.C.

 16 at 28.)

The Agency also responded to the comments requesting a 60

percent level of reduction versus 81 percent.

 The Agency stated

that it was not convinced that a 60 percent facility-wide

reduction approach would be advantageous to many bakeries and the

Agency believes that 81 percent control is achievable and cost

effective level of control.

 (P.C.

 16 at 30.)

 In support of this

position, the Agency points to the USEPA’ s comment (~gP.C. 7).

The Agency has recommended that some flexibility be allowed in

20

this

 area and proposed

change

the

rulemaking

which

was

discussed

abOVe~

~oara

ActiOn

The Board

will

 accept the recommendation offered by the

AGency for amendments to the proposal on emission limits for

bakery

 OVEnS.

 The Board appreciates the extensive comments

provided by

the

bakery

industry;

however,

the

 remaining

sucoestioflE

~or

 change

 offerec

by andustry are not supported by

the

record.

The

 USE.PA clearly agrees with the Agency that 81

percent control

IS

viable ano achievable.

 Further,

 many of the

o~i~ionsquestioned

 by the industry such as recordkeeping and

~onitoring

 have been further explained by the Agency,

 which

should

alleviate

these

concerns.

The

Board

will

amend

the

rules

 relating to bakery ovens at

second notice as follows:

section

2i8j~l~

~.7

Control

Requirements

~nc~nc~

or

 ?~orof ~

 ~curce

sub~ect

the

contro~

may

elect

 ~empt

from

the

 ccntroi

r

uirement~

suh~ection~~~1

oy~n~jbactua~

vo~

 emis~cj.cn~~essthan~or

 equal.ta

.~1

su~.

~xer~ot

bakery.

ov~fl~

.nev~r

~25~

‘J~P~..:

NotWithstanthn~:

the

j.fl.

~

.(~

of

thi.~_S~ct3o~until

 ~ar~15~

 ~998

anIy,

~

~sourcemay

e~.ectto ccmp1~with

the

crn~tr.ol

rem.~ire~ents

than~t~er~orit~o1

j

~ub

~

~j~I)

or

~

a,...jj~i

 ~~on

 ~nats

at .tb~

the

acrg~gte)

~

____*

p

E

.F~.

uda~q

n

21b

~05

th.a.~

Subpart)

 S~T ~e~~uda~

 S~ctaor

2J~~6 of

tna.s

~ubpart1

X

Y

 Z ~r

~

 o~th.~

~thnart

have

 ~ru.m

 thecretica.1 e~1~.io~s

 of jese

than 90

7 ~

 (1O~)to~n~)cf

VGM per year pr’ ~e

toles.s

 than 90

 7 Ma

 f100 tors)

 of VO1~em.assior~per

calendar

year

,in

 the absence of

air po1Iutpp~icPntrQJI

—.—

—

—

.~.I

—

_A_.

._.J;

.L_..4. 11.44.

1.24.2

._~JAS~.1

ccntamned

ifl

 federall~yenforceable permit C~o~ditaonsor

~~.:::Opei~ate.

.e~j::1~

zr~ccntmfl~dVcM

em:eo

 of~tle.~zt60

pero~fl~

frcr~each ba)~erycve~v:tb i~rate~d

heat

 thp~.it

at~:eas~z

B~tuJ~Ir

 or at

least

58~

~

am..

~

~pj~ baiker~ova~ at the .sou~rce~

 h~ been

approved

B~t~e

e..n~ a~

 USEP.~tr~u~bfederaflv

e~iforceab2e~srm~t cc~ditionsor as~a ~TP

v~~ke~yovent

 hat becoine~subiect tot

~~irements

 of this Su~~t at any time shall remain

subject

 to the reouirements

 of this

 Subpart

 at all

times

thereafter.

_____

23.8/2

Record.keeping

and

Reporting

yvery

owner

~j~ajtor

hak~ry

ov~n ~ib~h:.~i..s

frc~

the

control

2u~reme~t~~

cacf

the

 cr~atera.asDcc11~.ed.~nSection

21S

722

~b)

-‘-

 tbi~.Sub~art

h•l

...

~a~ntai.n

records

demonstrate~..~tth~

actual

OM~j ~saon

empt

 bakery

ovens

ai’~

less

 than or equal

to.

~iB

TPY

fèr

 e~.~be~.:~oven

~~t~~recua

tc

25TPY

 fr~n

~11

e~empt

baker’

 ovens_combined..

Suj

~

:b~

~a2

 t-aine’~for

the

rost

 recent ca~ecutive

3

ye~EIr

period

and

shall:’

 made

available

~mcoiatelv

 upon request;

and

Not If~

 eAoncv

in

if

the

t~á3A~VO~

C~±U5~iOfl~

from

:~~t

b•k•~•••

..______

Vo~

e

 ~j..pns

fro~na

~.gmbination. of exe~pt

baThzer~qovens

:~

.

TP~

s~ithmn 30

after

 the exceed~.nceoccurs.

SUchAflOtj~:

 ~.ha:~3~.incJude’a~copy.~f~.a

 :l~~ec~rds~of:

dl

 ~ve~y owner cr

°p rato~~

___________

are

1e~.s than

 7 Mg

 (i.~30tons)

of

VON pe~

“ear

Such

 records shafl r~e

maint~n~ed

for

the

 ~o~t

peC.5.~

CClseCrUtlVe

year

 ~r.iod

and

s~aU

 made

~~lanl?

the

~oenc~-

:mmedaetelv

u~~on

req~est~

2~8

‘2l~.73O

Certificatior~

~

 ~rcr

~Defore

 .~Marc~i15.

~

 ~cr u~oninataastartu~

~

 or o~er~ c~~ ~ak~rv

 oven ~hich i~

f

~

 cont~o~rec

 ~-?mants

this

~bpar.et

e-c~usecf

the

 cr~ter~aspecified

secUon

 21S.722~b.~

~

 Subpeft shall

certify that actu~.IVON emissions

~.1thvidua1

 exempt bakery o~r~nn~v~e~ççesd15

o~n5

the

 ~ggrea.ate, never exceed

25 TPY.

Onor

before

~arcb

3~5

1995

or

upon

initta.~.

 startup if

p~Pr~

oh

98e~erp~er

na~keYV

 oven

w~’1cb

 controlline emissicn.~~

~~v~.ded

_______

t~iis

Subp

1~a~imjnntheoretical emiss~onsas ~~c~fjed

an

gtior~2l~

722.~c~

are less than 90

1~0~torw~

...

WOOD FURNITURE

COATINGS

harras14arCP.5~

OP.P

C.ilJ

Mr.

Gordon

Nelson

testified

behalf

the

Harris

Marcus

Group

(Harris

Marcus)

the

Board’s

December

2,

1994,

hearing.

(Exh.

 22.)

Mr.

Nelson

indicated

that

 is Vice President of

Operations

for

Harris

Marcus,

which

has

facility

located

3757

South

Ashland

lfl

 Chicago.

 (Exh.

22

1.)

Harris

Marcus

specialty

m~fli~facturer

portable

lighting

and

promotional

furniture,

originally

founded

197?.

(Exh.

2.)

Harris

Marcus

emploY5

approximately

soo

people

and

produces

its

product

Chicago.

(Id.)

The

Harris

Marcus

 facility

 is a

custom,

made—to—Order

operation

with

 over

15,000

finished

goods

and

end

itemS

with

small

quantity

typical

production

runs

36.

(Exh:

23.)

these

processes,

use

 variety

coatings

necessary.

1993

the

 facility

used

different

wood coatings and

140

different

coatings

its

metal

products.

(Exh.

34.)

Mr. Nelson testified that the estimated

 emissions

 of VOlls

from the facilitY

ifi

1994

 Is “fIfty—four

 (54)

 tons per year,

thirty-two

tons

which

 are attributable to wood furniture

coating

operations,

fourteen

(14)

tons

metal

coating

operatioflS~ and eight

(8)

 tons to other substrates.”

 (Exh.

 22 at

4.)

Mr.

 NelSCfl testified that Harris Marcus will be adversely

affected

the

changes

proposed

 in this rulemaking

 lowering the

threshold of applicability in wood furniture coatings from 100

tons

per

year

tons

per

year,

and

the

lowering

the

VON

content

applicable

the

metal

coating

operations

the

Harris

Marcus

facility.

(Exh,

5.)

Mr.

Ne~scn

 testiti5o.

that

the

 Harris Marcus facility wall

‘1be

unable

meet

the

 limitations of the

proposed

rules

without

either

severe

restriction

 in its production

 or monetary

burden.”

(Exh.

5.)

Mr.

Ne1SO~’S

 testimony

 indicates

 that the Harris

23

Marcus’ suppliers of wood and metal coatings have only recently

began to offer low VON-content and water-based coatings.

 (Id.)

Mr. Nelson states that the some of these coatings “while meeting

the VON limitations of the regulations, do not produce a saleable

product”.

 (Exh.

 22 at 5-6.)

 Mr. Nelson further indicated that

the cost of add-on control equipment is estimated at an

annualized cost of VOM emissions control ranging between $15,000

 and $30,000 per ton with a cost for wood coating at $25,000 to

$50,000 per ton.

 (Exh.

 22 at 6.)

In its final comment, Harris Marcus suggests four options

which it is requesting the Board consider to mitigate the

economic hardship the regulations as proposed will impose.

 (P.C.

11 at 3-7.)

 First, Harris Marcus suggests that the Board retain

the 100 ton per year VON applicability threshold for wood

furniture coating.

 (P.C.

 11 at 3.)

 Harris Marcus points out

that the Agency testimony indicated that the Agency does not

believe any wood furniture coating facilities in the Chicago area

will be affected by the new applicability level.

 (P.C.

 11 at

3,

citing to Exh.

 1 at

 4 and Exh.

 7 at 2.)

 Further, the Agency is

“not required by USEPA to lower the applicability threshold for

wood furniture coating” and USEPA has not issued a CTG for wood

furniture coating.

 (P.C.

 11 at 3.)

Harris Marcus argues that the inclusion of the provision

lowering the wood furniture threshold is inappropriate as a part

of the Section 28.5 process.

 (P.C.

 11 at 4.)

 Harris Marcus

maintains that Section 28.5 allows adoption of “a rule that the

federal Clean Air Act Amendments

 (CAAA)

 requires to be adopted

before December 31,

 1996” and this proposal was initiated to

fulfill requirements of Section 182(b) (1)

 of the

CAAA

relating to

reasonable further progress.

 (Id.)

 Harris Marcus points out

that the Agency “conceded that it has not relied upon lowered

applicability threshold to meet its 15

 ROP obligations because

it has not expected any emission reductions from the proposed

rule change.”

 (Id.)

The second suggestion from Harris Marcus is that the

proposal include an exemption for coatings used in small amounts.

(P.C.

 11 at 5.)

 Harris Marcus points to the agreement the Agency

made to allow an exemption for touch—up and repair coatings to

support its proposal.

 (Id.)

 Harris Marcus maintains that there

is no technical basis for limiting the exemption to touch-up and

repair coatings, when the operations at facilities like Harris

Marcus, where there are few if any production lines and coatings

are applied manually, also seem to £it the description.

 (Id.)

Thirdly, Harris Marcus suggests that a separate category for

custom wood furniture and lamp manufacturing be established in

the proposed rule based on the language offered at hearing.

(P.C.

 11 at 6.)

 Finally, Harris Marcus suggests that use of

emission reduction credits be recognized.

 (Id.)

24

Agency Response to Harris Marcus

The Agency reiterates,

 in its final comment, that the change

 for wood coating will lower the applicability threshold; however,

the Agency is not changing the VON content limits.

 (P.C.

 16 at

15.)

 The Agency states that its proposal:

is a necessary part of the State’s 15

 ROP Plan.

 If the

applicability level for this category is not lowered back to

the pre—FIP 25 TPY level, it is possible for emissions from

this category to increase, creating a “backsliding” effect.

Those increases would negatively impact the 15

 ROP Plan and

make it difficult to obtain the necessary reductions.

 (P.C.

16 at 16.)

The Agency concedes that there is no CTG for wood coatings

at the present time, although USEPA anticipates publishing a CTG

in 1995.

 (P. C.

 16 at 17.)

 The Agency maintains that, even

without the final CTG, Illinois is required to regulate sources

above 25 tons per year because it is

RACT.

 (Id.)

 Further, the

Agency states that Harris Marcus

is:

the only source objecting to the proposed changes to the

wood furniture coating regulations.

 All other wood

furniture coating facilities identified by the Agency are

either already complying with the limits, which are not

changed by this proposal, or are emitting less than 25 TPY

of VOM.

 (P.C.

 16 at 20—21.)

The Agency also asserts that Harris Marcus should currently be

complying with current metal coating VON content limitations and

 that Harris Marcus exceeds the 100 tons per year maximum

theoretical emissions for wood coatings as well.

 (P.C.

 16 at

18.)

 With regard to the other suggested changes by Harris

Marcus, the Agency maintains that the record lacks sufficient

information to proceed with those changes.

 (P.C.

 16 at 18—20.)

The Agency suggests that if Harris Marcus is a “unique” facility,

the changes are better addressed through an adjusted standard.

(P.C.

 16 at 20.)

Board Action

The Board will lower the applicability threshold for wood

furniture coating operations from 100 tons per year maximum

theoretical emissions

 (MTE)

 to 25 tons per year potential to emit

(PTE)

 as requested by the Agency in this proposal.

 The Board

will make this change because the Agency has demonstrated that

the change in applicability level is a necessary part of the

Illinois 15

 ROP Plan, and because the record shows that the

change in applicability is economically reasonable for the

majority of the sources in the Illinois wood furniture coating

industry.

 The Board will also promulgate the VOM emission limits

25

for the different

types

 of wood furniture coatings proposed by

the Agency at 218/219.204(1), which represents no change from

current regulations.

The

CAA

requires

all

moderate

and

worse

ozone

nonattainment

areas to achieve by 1996 a 15

 reduction of 1990 VON emissions.

The states are allowed to choose the control measures for the

nonattainment

areas

that

will

reduce

VON

emissions

meet

the

15

 requirement, except that the

CAA

identifies the specific

measures that are not creditable towards the 15

 reduction.

Further, the

CAA

requires states to account for any growth in

emissions after 1990 in developing the 15

 ROP plan.

 Therefore,

state

may

develop

ROP

plan

which

would

require

actual

VOM

emission reductions for certain categories of sources, and

maintenance of baseline emission levels for other source

categories to meet the 15

 VON reduction requirement.

For example,

 if there are eight sources in a nonattainmerit

area with a 1990 baseline emission level of 100 tons per year,

a

ROP

plan

may

require

six

the

sources

achieve

reductions

totaling 15 tons per year

 (15)

 and require the remaining two

 sources to maintain baseline emission levels.

 Even though the

two sources are not required to reduce VON emissions, they are an

integral component of the 15

 ROP plan since they contribute

towards the 15

 VON reduction by maintaining the 1990 baseline

emission levels.

The Agency notes that it developed a plan incorporating the

reduction measures for each nonattairnuent area (Chicago and East

St. Louis)

 to reduce VON emissions to meet the 15

 VON reduction

requirement.

 (Prop. at 1-2.)

 Further, the Agency states that

tightening the wood furniture coating applicability levels was

identified as a control measure for the 15

 ROP plan for both

nonattainment areas.

 (Prop. at 2-3.)

 In this regard, the Agency

states that while no reductions are expected from this category,

the proposed amendments are important because they ensure that

VON emission increases will not occur in wood furniture coating

operations

 in comparison to the 1990 VOM emission level.

 (Prop.

at 12.)

 In effect, the proposed change of applicability level

for wood furniture coating operations from 100 tons per year MTE

to 25 tons per year PTE is an integral part of the Agency’s 15

ROP plan.

Therefore, if the amendments to the wood furniture coating

requirements are not accepted by the Board as a part of the 15

ROP plan, the Agency may have to identify other measures to

offset any increases in VON emissions from wood coating

 operations above the 1990 baseline levels to meet the 15

reduction requirement.

 For these reasons the Board finds that

the inclusion of wood furniture coatings in the proposed 15

ROP

plan is necessary and this proposal was appropriately filed under

Section 28.5 of the Act.

26

The Board is also required by the Act to consider the

economic reasonableness and technical feasibility of rules before

promulgation.

 The Board will first examine technical feasibility

and then the economic reasonableness of the proposed wood

furniture coating limitation.

 As proposed, the amendments to the

wood coating requirements of Parts 218 and 219 do not change the

existing VON limits for wood furniture coatings.

 The affected

facilities may comply with the proposed regulations by: using

compliant coatings; adding emission control equipment; or

limiting emissions to less than 25 tons per year.

 Regarding VON

limits for coatings, the Agency states that coatings with VON

content levels which meet the limitations are available and have

been used by

numerous

 sources for several years.

 (Prop. at 19.)

Further, the Agency states that the coating applicators required

for wood furniture coaters in the proposed regulations are

available and used by most sources.

 (Id.)

 Regarding add—on

controls, the Agency notes that technology for controlling VON

 emissions from wood furniture coating operations through add—on

control is available and includes thermal or catalytic

incinerators and adsorption devices.

 (Id.)

 However, the Agency

admits that it could not find any instances of wood furniture

coating operations using add—on controls in Illinois

nonattainment areas.

 (Attach. 16c at 3.)

 In this regard, the

Agency states that it is likely that any sources impacted by this

proposal would choose permit conditions to place them below the

applicability level or compliant coatings rather than add-on

controls as the method of compliance.

 (Exh.7 at 3.)

Harris Marcus states that compliance with the proposed

regulations would result in severe restrictions on its production

or monetary burden because of the nature of its operation, which

involves a custom made—to—order operation with over 15,000

finished goods end items.

 Harris Marcus says that it used over

40 different coatings on its wood furniture products in 1993 of

which some coatings do not meet the proposed limitations.

 (Exh.

5 at

4,

5.)

 Further, Harris Marcus notes that its efforts to use

compliant coatings instead of high VON-content coatings have not

resulted in the production of saleable products.

 Thus, Harris

Marcus contends that the only compliance alternative available

under the proposed regulations is add—on pollution control

equipment.

 In this regard, Harris Marcus does not question the

 availability of appropriate control technology, but argues that

the costs associated with the installation of such controls are

unreasonable.

The Agency’s position on technical feasibility of the

proposed regulations is based on the fact that the proposed VON

limits on coatings are the same as existing limits and on the

observation that all existing sources are already in compliance

with the proposed regulations.

 The Agency identified 19

potentially affected sources based on a review of its emission

inventory system

 (EIS).

 (Attach. 16c at 6.)

 The Harris Marcus

27

facility was not a part of this list of affected facilities.

The

record indicates that the 19 existing sources identified by the

Agency are either complying by using compliant coatings or

emitting less than 25 tons per year of VON.

 None of these

19

compliant sources are using add—on controls.

 Harris Marcus

contends that the only compliance alternative available for its

facility

add-on

controls.

The information in the record concerning economic

reasonableness includes a discussion by the Agency of the costs

of both reformulated coatings and add—on controls using the

information included in the USEPA’s draft CTG for wood furniture

coating operations.

 The Agency has stated that one of the

reasons for USEPA not including the CTG for wood furniture

 coating with other surface coating CTGs is due to the

complexities involved in this industry.

 (Attach.

 16c at

3.)

According to the Agency, the total annual cost of switching from

existing coatings to reformulated coatings range from:

 $85,330 to

$1,128,860 for waterborne coating systems; $38,280 to $644,915

for hybrid waterborne coating systems; $144,170 to $1,083480 for

polyester/polyurethane

 (pe/pu)

 system; and $162,040 to $1,606,960

for hybrid pe/pu system.

 (Attach. 16c at 10-13.)

 These costs

consider material storage, drying capabilities, paint

circulation, and the need for clean room environment.

 The cost

break—downs for the four types of reformulated coatings are

provided in Exhibit 23.

Regarding add-on controls, the Agency notes that the costs

vary with the size of the source and the type of equipment used.

(Prop. at 19.)

 Information presented by the Agency indicates

that for sources emitting 50 TPY to 500 TPY, the capital costs

for control devices range from $446,400 to $11,393,400.

The

operating costs range from $170,700 to $3,439,500.

 (Attach. 16c

at 9.)

 These costs are based on a scheme where a single control

device controls all VON emissions from the source.

 The costs for

different types of control equipment are presented in the

proposal.

 (Id.)

Harris Marcus also presented a preliminary estimate of

annualized cost of VON control for its coating processes.

According to this information, the total direct annual costs for

operating a thermal regenerative incinerator would be $414,079

and for a thermal recuperative incinerator would be

 $1,873,000.

(Exh.

 23.)

 In addition, Harris Marcus expects equipment and

engineering costs to exceed $1,500,000.

 These estimates cover

all coating operations, which include metal and wood coating

lines.

 The cost information provided by Harris Marcus is

presented in Exhibit 23.

In

summary,

the Agency has requested that the Board lower

the applicability level for wood furniture coating operations

from 100 tons per year

MTE

to 25 tons per year PTE.

 The Agency

28

states that the change is part of the state’s 15

 ROP Plan, and

the change is economically reasonable and technically feasible

because 19 potentially affected facilities can be in compliance

at no cost.

 Harris Marcus contends that they are adversely

affected because lowering the VON emission applicability level

would require them to use unreasonably expensive add—on equipment

to control VON emissions.

 After careful consideration of the

record, the Board finds that the change in applicability level is

economically reasonable and technically feasible for the majority

(19 out of 20)

 of wood-furniture coating operations in Illinois,

 and therefore the Board will adopt the proposed changes at

Sections 218.208(b) and 219.108(b).

 There is not enough specific

information in the record about Harris Marcus’ operations to

determine whether or not a different VOM emission applicability

level should apply to it.

 Harris Marcus might wish to consider

other relief as provided for in the Act such as filing a proposal

with the Board for possible site—specific rulemaking or adjusted

standard relief.

In reviewing the other requests for changes by Harris

Marcus, the Board agrees with the Agency that the record lacks

sufficient information to proceed at this time.

 The Board again

encourages Harris Marcus to review the possibility of a site—

specific rulemaking or adjusted standard to address its remaining

concerns.

SOCMI

Stepan ColuIDanv (P.C.

12)

Stepan Company (Stepan) requests in its comment that the

proposed rule regulating SOCMI be extended to include Stepan”s

non-SOCMI processes.

 (P.C.

 12 at 1-2.)

 Stepan maintains that

its processes are virtually identical to the processes which

would be covered by the Agency’s proposal, and in fact those

units can produce either SOCMI or non-SOCMI products.

 (Id.)

Stepan argues that the approach proposed in Subpart V is more

appropriate than the provisions of the general rule, and

inclusion of Stepan’s processes in this rulemaking might

alleviate the need for site-specific relief being sought by

 Stepan in two proceedings, one before the Board (AS 88—2) and one

rule before USEPA.

 (P.C.

 12 at 2, 8—10.)

Stepan points out that the Agency, in response to

questioning, agreed that the approach proposed for SOCMI sources

is “technically appropriate for Stepan’s continuous non—SOCMI

distillation and reactor processes”.

 (Tr. at 44—46;

 P.C.

 12 at

2.)

 Stepan also provides discussion of three of its processes

and points out similarities between the non—SOCHI processes and

the SOCMI processes.

 Stepan notes that “some of Stepan’s

products are listed as SOCMI chemicals in the Federal CTG list

but not in the State’s Appendix A list.”

 (P.C.

 12 at 6.)

 Based

29

on the comments filed and the testimony of the Agency,

 Stepan

urges

the

Board

adopt

amendatory

language

which

will

include

Stepan’s

processes

its

Millsdale

Plant

Subpart

the

proposal.

(P.C.

and

12.)

Agency Response

The Agency agrees that the VOMs produced in Stepan’s

continuous reactor and distillation operations in Stepan’s

Millsdale facility “have characteristics similar to SOCMI

 chemicals that are manufactured as a primary product.”

 (P.C. 16

at 38.)

 The Agency states that it “believes that inclusion of

these processes is reasonable”.

 (Id.)

 Therefore, the Agency has

recommended an amendment to include Stepan’s processes in the

proposal.

(P.C.

38—39.)

Board Action

The Board finds that the record supports the inclusion of

Stepan’s processes in the rule to be subject to the SOCMI

regulations.

Therefore

the

Board

will

amend

Section

218.431

adding

subsection

(a)

(2)

which

will

read:

ZL

 All continuous distillation and reactor process

emission units not sub-ject to Section 218.520 through

218.527 of this Part, and located within Stepan

Company’

Millsdale manufacturing facility, Elwood,

Illinois.

TOUCH-UP

AND

REPAIR COATINGS. MARINE ENGINE COATINGS

AND

CROSS-LINE AVERAGING

Illinois

Environmental

Regulatory

Groui

(IERG)

(P.C.

13)

IERG,

its

final

comment,

notes

that

IERG

has

met

with

the

Agency to discuss concerns about the regulatory proposal.

Specifically, those concerns include marine engine manufacturing

industry’s ability to comply with the coating standards, the

necessity

exemption

from

the

coating

standards

for

touch—up

or repair coating and the availability of cross—line averaging

provisions to show compliance with the coating standards.

 (P.C.

13 at 1.)

 IERG also expressed support for the consensus reached

between

Electric

and

the

Agency

for

cross—line

averaging,

which

discussed

detail

below.

(P.C.

2.)

Ms. Elizabeth Steinhour testified on behalf of IERG

regarding touch-up and repair coatings

 (Exh.

 30).

 Ms. Steinhour

testified that scratches or nicks may occur during the

manufacturing process and repair is made using a limited amount

of coating.

 (‘Exh.

 30 at 2.)

 Ms. Steinhour states:

30

It is my understanding that generally, but not in all

instances, the application of touch-up coatings which would

meet the emissions limitations dictated by the proposed

Sections 218/219.204 is inappropriate in that such coatings

are either not readily available, inadequate for the purpose

 intended,

 or would require a substantial revision of the

application processes currently utilized for touch—up

operations.

 (Id.)

Ms. Steinhour also testified that “the inclusion of such a touch-

up exemption within the regulations would not constitute a

loosening for the Federal Implementation Plan.”

 (Exh.

 30 at 6.)

IERG provided proposed amendments to the proposal which

would exempt touch-up and repair coatings.

 (P.C.

 13 at 3-6.)

IERG

states

that

and

the

Agency

agree

that

“the

adoption

the proposed exemption would place necessary, yet practical,

limitations on the use of touch—up and repair coatings.”

 (P.C.

13 at 6.)

 IERG also states in its final comment that it supports

the

adoption

cross—line

averaging

provisions

including

the

revisions

proposed

Electric

(~g

P.C.

15,

discussed

above).

(Id.)

Agency

Response

IERG

The

Agency

agrees

that

higher

VON

content

for

marine

engine coatings is necessary.

 Therefore, the Agency is

recommending

amendment

the

proposal

which

would

raise

the

limit

 3.5 lb/gal for as-applied coating for baked

applications.

 (P.C.

 16 at 11.)

 The Agency notes that of

significant importance is the fact that various gaskets and

plastic

parts

used

the

paints

sub—assemblies

are

subject

failure at higher baking temperatures that are employed to

accommodate lower VON content coatings.

 (Id.)

 Failure of these

gaskets

and

parts

could

create

loss

torque

control,

which

has

potential serous product reliability and safety ramifications.

(Id.)

The Agency is also recommending a change in cross—line

averaging as discussed in detail in below with the comments filed

by S

 & C Electric.

Board Action

The Board accepts the recommendations for amendments as

proposed by the IERG and the Agency.

 The Board will amend

Section 218.204(j) to read:

-

~i~t~nt.

.

2~3*.

3

S C:

coat

(4. 3~

—

‘.

‘

—

 _.U_~_i~__~.!

~‘

(

~

~

:

~

n~

ttr~~L

CC.:j

i

r~:~c

~çflL_~

(

‘~

ç’f

CC~2’~’

~

4~__-~Qr~

~~!~2JS~

 c:rx.~.1 PS

 th._t

~JJ.

rr~cc~c~.

~~~ar~cj.na

corr~o~:j

r

I

st

~fl C

e•

II~lCi.C~(~$•~CT.

i~r0Ce~S”•

fl1C~3fl~.

for

~Yac:_~.pc~’~:

c~

j~.

tj..çm..

8..

2CI4.(.ij~1

-—

t

 _Lj~J2P_trL~.p

‘J~c4r)c’~i

~

The

 co~ti~’ç~

~1

~‘

~.ttriet(:.~

 t~c :-ubstrate_•th~e..~tothe

~cc~ti.r~?r

 c~1~ctcnt~.~

d~i1fcrenc?

“~r

-~_

-.c

‘s-c

t~c~rs.._~g~’

~j~cf__c~Q.~i

~I8

 2C~4

 )(E1

c

~r’5

 trc-~crfDrrcancc

rrctect

v’s..

 dr.ccrativ~....or:..

~.Imct:ional

c

 anc-’-g~ne_that~s

~‘3 to ~rqpe.

 ~tcrcraft

c~

 c~t~-section

 2.1~.12.O4..(.1..)&6).:: of.

~cticr

~et&LC

 coatinq~’

means

a

~

 t.nan

114

lh/~~

:.oar~;I~.aiEc

~r:e~

Section

21E1’2JS.20~

to include:

~

c~~

...

cr2be

~?L~

_________

~-~--~

 2O4(E~,

~)

~

 (~i~~t

(:i).,

hi)

~nd

 1o~) of~

:~I3~~1~

Subpart~

prcv~c~edzJiat

t~h?

zcurce—~wide

volume

L.~c,a~gs

 ~QQQ~.~ç~e

“~

~

~

______

~_py

ro I Ia~o

1’ve

~n~c~th

per aod

Re~tor.dke~a~

~

~

C

~

•

I~••~

•,~:.

~•~•1~

•

~:!.i,•~•i

~

••:.

~

•

•~

••.

.~.

~••~

..~

•.~

~

~

,,,

•

$:ect

.•••.•.~

Ljj-~~---~LnL,,,.

 and~)

oft~

subpart

pQ~2~~i~

.~,..

2~

2~~~Lca~

~

;~L

~

•.~,•-

~

?i~ber~arid

vo1ui~ne used

ht~uc~-up

a~d

r~p~i~:

 co~j~nga~~ppJ~~a~

on

 cbo~t13~jan~

~e~a~oY~

 -hour p~ri~od~~idper ~non~±

;•_L

~

~

 o~ a d~iv b~s±s~

~

~in

.of

the

cn~:D1ne~d

touch~n~

~

 coat~qs

USE~

 soUrce—w3de for epch

~

.~j_

Perfo~

oa1cui:atit~s

~onthJ1y

bas~,

and

~~3~flt~n

the

scurc~e records

o~ s~cth

~u1at~ons

the

coithined

 vol~ep~tovcb’—up

~flc~

~ep~a~

coat~p~gs~

 ~ourc~—~.d~e for the month

the

rollinq

twelve

~onth

 ‘peri~d~

P~e~re ~ndm

 n~tt

 tree a~

~r~3a~t

 to suseotian

 c’J(4~A) a~ .(c)(4)(B) Gf

Thllowi~g

year~

~

 ~aintai~n -at th~s-o~rce

for

~ir~i~

 period of

~hrec

 years all records rm~ired

to

)~ept ui~d~~

thi~subs~ct~rn

~nd

 m~e such recox~d~

av~J~Lab~LG

to

—

~p a~3

rep~ar

co~t in~s

the

su~oe

ever

exceed~

a vol

~in-eof 0 95 1

 ~iart~

 per eight-hou.~.~?r~1~

~

~

Such

 ~tIficstion

 sh~l

include

~

1~oc~.

L..

~

~

113.

 Ad.m

 Cocie2l~2O~

any

 costinq

Used

to

~v.er

~min~r

sçratcbes~d

~çs

that

oc~r

th~rinq

~ufn~in~

 snd ass~blvproC~S~~s.

Section

 218.431 will

read:

Tne

~D~CV~S1O~S

of

S

 tiors

218

 throuah

 218-

436

this

~j

 ~fX~V owner

 coerator of any chemical

manufacturing

nrocess

unit

that

manufactures,

primary

Droduct~

one

or~Q,~,.p~the,

che~ic

.~jsted

Appendix

this

Part

and

that

eThical

inanufacturinc

process

unit

causes

~.k1ows

any

reactor

distillation

unit,

either

individually

tandem,

discharge

one

process

vent

streams

either

directly

the

atmosphere

rec~.yçrY

 system.~ arid

Section

219.431

 will

amended

 read:

a,

 Th~,,

p~Y~l~

~

shall

P

é~Q9~ç~r

~

 ~~p~in

 process unit~ha~~a

~çti~~

a~ a

~~y~product,

 one or more of the chemicals listed

in

Aof

this

Part

and

that

chemical

manufacturing

 allows

any

 r~ç~pr•o~is

ion

~~~ther

 individually or in tandem,

 to discharge

 one or

1~g~ocess vent streams either directly to the atmosphere

ortoarecov

 ery system.

ord.

 ~a~e

 c,9rporat on (2.C.143

outboard Marine Corporation

 (Outboard)

 filed a comment

in

support of two specific revisions

 initially proposed

 in the

testimony

 of Elizabeth Steinhour

 of IERG

 (which was discussed

in

detail above).

 Outboard supports

 a separate

category under

Section

 218.204(3)

 regulating miscellaneous metal parts and

product coatings for marine engine coatings.

 (P.C.

14

 at 1—2.)

Outboard

maintains

that

coatings

that

meet

the

limits

proposed

are

not

availab.?.e

for

marine

engine

coatings,

 specific

section

addressing

marine

engine

coatings

necessary.

(P.C.

2.)

outboard

also

 supports

exemption

for

touch—up

coating.

outboard

points

out

that

it

critical

that

it

allowed

touch—UP

any

scratches,

nicks,

other

minor

paint

defects

which

might occur during manufacturjn~

and

the

assembly

process.

 (Id.)

Low VON coatings are not viable and Outboard

is

not

aware

alternative

IOWYOM

 technology that could be used.

 (P.c.

 14 at

2~3.)

Qutboara

aoes

ask

that

the

Eoard

consider

daily

limit

34

for touch-up coatings rather than the eight hour limit proposed

by IERG.

 (P.C.

 14 at 3.)

 Outboard argues that recordkeeping for

an eight hour period would be burdensome and impractical.

 (P.C.

3—4.)

Agency Response to Outboard

The Agency did not specifically respond to the comments of

Outboard.

 Rather the Agency responded to IERG comments which

were similar to the comments by Outboard.

 Those comments and the

response

are

discussed

above.

Board

Action

The Board finds that the record lacks sufficient information

to support the adoption of a daily limit for touch—up coatings

recommended by Outboard.

3.

S

& C

Electric Company (P.C.

15)

Mr. Robert Sullivan testified on behalf of the S

& C

Electric

Company

the

Board’s

December

 1994 hearing.

Mr.

Sullivan

testified

that

the

 & C Electric Company owns and

operates

facility

Chicago

 which manufactures as one of its

products a high-voltage metal enclosed switch gear.

 (Exh.

 33 at

1.)

 Mr. Sullivan testified in support of the adoption of the

cross—line averaging proposal.

 (Exh.

 33 at 2.)

S & C Electric notes in its final comment that the cross-

line averaging provision in this proposal does not “anticipate

the actual situation at S & C”.

 (P.C.

 15 at 3.)

 That situation

that

has

spent

date

about

$10

million

developing

and

implementing the use of powder coatings prior to this rulemaking.

(Id.)

 As a result,

S

 & C has reduced its emissions over 15,

but

at this time is unable to convert any additional lines to powder

coatings.

 (P.C.

 15 at 3.)

 Therefore,

 S & C and the Agency have

developed proposed language which would allow cross—line

averaging using coating lines added after July 1,

 1988 under very

limited

circumstances.

(P.C.

4—5.)

S & C indicates in its final comment that it supports the

exemption for touch-up and repair coatings proposed by IERG.

(P.C.

 15 at 6.)

Agency ResDonse to S & C

The Agency, in its final comments, recommends a change in

the proposal which would allow credit to be given to facilities

which were making the change to powder coatings even before there

was

great

incentive.

(P.C.

15.)

The

change

being

suggested

Sections

218/219.212

and

218/219.213.

Board Ac~jQn

The Board accepts the recommendations

 for amendments

as

proposed

&

C

and

the

Agency.

The

Board

will

amend

Sections

218.212,

 218.213,

219.212

 and 219.213

 to read:

~g~ion~~8/2l9.2l2

 Cross-Line Averacinc

Establish

Compliance

for_Coating

Lines

I~ ~‘ft~.is”Se~on~.-any

me subject to -the

Itmitations

set

 forth in section 218.204--of-this

~Ject

i’-~gto

1’~. on

this

Sect

ion

~~re

 .c..ci~pliance

~i’-)i

 tTh~sSubpart, nay

lso

flgeas

 a Dart~c2pata~co~t~cjlne~

 unti.l

December

~nt~

i’~ie

that sat

s f~es ~

f_the~p~1

:lp~’ang

conditions

r~p~ace~.e~t

.ii

 ~cnerated

 as a

powder

coat

Lng

 line

ir

~,p.çcr~=jt

3._ne

~as

~-ci~?~

~fte.r

 July

i

ncre’~crcratc~-

 also inc~uies as a

~rticipati~~g.coatjng

 line one

or--~or~e

:~c~tiña

Ifl~I~i)1?~it~

 ~~tn~cr

ten a of a

rep la ceme~

~

 as described in s..~bsectaon~

 o.f this

demonstrate

comoliance

with

this

Section,

source

shal

estab ii

fol

lowing;

alternative

daily

emission

limitation

shall

determined

for

 all participating coating

 lines

at

~he source accoraing to

~ubscction

Q~~f

t~1~

~ectj.

‘~

3~a ~t

coat

ne~ s~aU

~actor~du~

each

day

oc’mcnstrate

compliance

Prc.y.i

ded co~n3

 -iance- ~

recuiment~...in-.-tb~s-subs~ctjcn~:.~nO?

::~thi

~ecticn

r~guires

daily

operation

o~ each

rticipat~j~q

 lane

 ~Actual aaily emissions

 from

all--~articip~tjngcoating

 lines (EJ~shall never

exceed the alternative daily emission limitation

~dj~and

 shall be calculated

 by use of the

following

equation:

S~ctin

2l~,(2~.~13

Recordkeenjna and Reoortinq- for Cross—Line

Averaoincpartjc~~a~jflqCoating Lines

36

Any

owner

or operator of a coating line that elects to comply by

means

Section

218.212

this

Subpart

shall

establish

the

following:

~j

 BY the date consistent with Section 218.210(f)

 of this

Subpart, or upon initial start-up of a new coating line

replacing a pre—existing coating line,

 as defined in

Section 218.212 of this Subpart, or upon changing the

method of compliance for a pre-existing coating line

from the recruirements of Section 218.204 or Section

218.207 of this Subpart to the requirements of Section

218.212 of this Subpart, the owner or operator of the

source shall certify to the Acrencv that each

participatino coating line,

 as determined in accordance

with Section 218.212 of this Subpart. will be in

 compliance with Section 218.212 of this Subpart on and

after

date

consistent

with

Section

218.210(f)

this

Subpart,

and

after

the

initial

start-up

date

such participating coating lines.

 Such certification

shall also include:

.~J..

 The method by which the

owner

or operator has

calculated K, for

the

equation contained in

Section 218.212~~~~of this Subpart,

if

applicable.

CONCLUSION

The Board has carefully considered all public comments,

as

well

 the testimony and exhibits in this matter.

 Although

there

are

still

areas

 controversy, the majority of

the

proposal is supported by the regulated community.

 Where

controversy remains in the areas of bakeries and plastic parts

coatings,

the

Board

has

found

that

the

record

supports

proceeding

second

notice

with

those

proposed

amendments

modified

suggestions from the Agency.

 In the area of wood furniture

 coatings, the Board has found that the Agency-proposed amendments

to the wood furniture coatings regulations are appropriate for a

Section 28.5 rulemaking and therefore, those provisions will

proceed to second notice.

The Board has accepted all agreed upon requested changes as

those changes are supported by the record before the Board.

The

Board finds that the proposed rules are technically feasible and

economically reasonable, and that the rules are necessary to meet

the requirements of the Clean Air Act.

 We find that the record

supports proceeding with the proposed rules,

 as amended, to

second

notice.

To assist comparison of today’s proposal with the proposal

as adopted for first notice on September 15,

 1994, the Board

indicates revisions by highlighting (redlining)

 in the order that

37

follows.

Appropriate

underlining

and

strikeouts

 are included in

the

highlighting.

ORDER

The

Board

directs

the

Clerk

cause

the

filing

Second

Notice

 the following proposal with the Joint Committee on

Administrative

Rules:

TITLE

35:

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION

SUBTITLE

AIR

POLLUTION

CHAPTER

POLLUTION

CONTROL

BOARD

SUBCHAPTER

EMISSION

STANDARDS AND

LIMITATIONS

FOR

STATIONARY

SOURCES

PART

211

DEFINITIONS

AND

GENERAL PROVISIONS

SUBPART

DEFINITIONS

Section

211.660

Automotive/Transportation

Plastic

Parts

211.670

Baked

Coatings

211.680

Bakery

Oven

211.820

Busi”ess

Machine

Plastic

Parts

211.980

Chemical

Manufacturing

 Process Unit

211.1780

Distillation

Unit

211.

1880

Electromagnetic

Interference/Radio

Freauencv

Interference

(E!41/RFI)

Shielding

Coatings

211.1900

Electrostatic

Prep

Coat

211.2290

Fermentation

Time

211.2360

Flexible

Coating

211.2365

Flexible

Operation

Unit

211.2630

Gloss

Reducers

211.4055

Non—Flexible

Coating

211.4740

Plastic

Part

211.5060

 Primary Product

211.5480

 Reflective Argent Coating

 211.5600

 Resist Coat

211.6060

 Soft Coat

211.6140

 Specialty Coatings

211.6400

 Stencil Coat

211.6580

 Texture Coat

211.6880

 Vacuum Metallizing

211.7400

 Yeast Percentage

AUTHORITY:

Implementing

Sections

9.1

and

authorized

Section

and

28.5

the

Environmental

Protection

Act

(Ill.

Rcv.

Ctat.

19~1,

oh.

111~, p~ro.

1009,

1009.1,

1010

and

1027),

(P.A.

87—1213,

pff

1~ri-

F~~-r~tcmbcr

26,

1992)

(415

ILCS

5/9,

9.1,

10,

and

28.5).

38

SOURCE:

Adopted

Chapter

Air

Pollution,

Rule

201:

Definitions,

R71-23,

PCB

191,

filed

and

effective

April

14,

1972; amended in R74—2 and R75—5,

 32 PCB 295, at

 3 Ill. Reg.

5,

p.

 777,

 effective February 3,

 1979; amended in R78—3 and 4,

35

PCB 75 and 243, at

 3 Ill. Reg.

30,

p.

 124, effective July 28,

1979;

amended

R80—5,

Ill.

Reg.

1244,

effective

January

21,

 1983; codified at

Ill.

Reg.

13590;

amended

R82—1

(Docket

Ill.

Reg.

12624,

effective

July

1986;

amended

R85—21(A)

Ill.

Reg.

11747,

effective

June

29,

1987;

amended

R86—34

Ill.

Reg.

12267,

effective

July

10,

1987;

amended

R86—39

Iii.

Reg.

20804,

effective

December

14,

1987;

amended

R82-14

and

R86-37

Ill.

Reg.

787,

effective

December

24,

1987;

amended

R86—18

Ill.

Reg.

7284,

effective

April

1988;

amended

R86—10

Ill.

Reg.

7621,

effective

April

11,

1988;

amended

R88—23

Ill.

Reg.

10862,

effective

June

27,

1989;

amended

R89—8

Ill.

Reg.

17457, effective January

1,

1990;

amended

R89—16(A)

Ill.

Reg.

9141,

effective

May

23,

1990;

amended

R88—30(B)

Ill.

Reg.

5223,

effective

March

28,

1991;

amended

R88-14

Ill.

Reg.

7901,

effective

May

14,

1991;

amended

R91—10

Ill.

Reg.

15564,

effective

October

11,

1991;

amended

R91—6

15 Ill. Reg.

 15673, effective October 14,

1991;

amended

R91—22

Ill.

Reg.

7656,

effective

May

1992;

amended

R91-24

Ill.

Reg.

13526,

effective

August

24,

1992;

 amended in R93-9

Ill.

Reg.

16504,

effective

September

27,

1993;

amended

R93-11

Ill.

Reg.

21471,

effective

December

1993;

amended

R93—14

Ill.

Reg.

1253,

 effective January 18,

 1994;

amended

R94-12

Iii.

Reg.

14962,

 effective September 21,

1994;

amended

R94-14

Ill.

Reg.

 15744, effective October

17,

1994;

amended

R94—l5

Ill.

Reg.

16379,

 effective

October

25,

1994;

amended

R94—16

Ill.

Reg.

16929,

effective

November

14,

1994;

amended

R94—21

Ill.

Reg.

effective

____________________________

Aet

as~~

 J~4y~

SUBPART

DEFINITIONS

Section 211.660

 Automotive/Transportation Plastic Parts

“Automotive/transportation plastic parts” means the interior and

exterior plastic components of automobiles, trucks, tractors,

lawnmowers. and other like mobile equipment intended for primary

use

land.

with

the

exception

the

following:

plastic

parts

coated

the

main

(body)

paint

line

automobile

and

light

duty

truck

assembly

plants.

and

elastic

carts

coated

during

refinishing

 automobile. trucks, tractors, lawnmowers and other

mobile

equipment.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

 effective

____

______________________________________________________)

Section 211.670

 Baked Coatings

39

“Baked coatings” means any coating which is cured or dried in an

oven

where

the

 oven air temperature exceeds 909C

 (194QF)--.

 or any

coatincr which is cured in any manner that does not otherwise fit

into

the

definition

“air

dried

coatings,”

defined

Section

211.330

this

Part.

Section

211.680

BakerY

Oven

“Bakery

oven”

means

oven

used

any

time

for

the

purpose

baking

yeast-leavened

products,

including,

but

not

 limited to,

breads,

rolls

and

buns.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

effective

____

)

Section

211.820

Business

Machine

Plastic

Parts

“Business

machine

plastic

parts”

means

the

plastic

 housings and

other

exterior

plastic

components

electronic

office

 equipment

and

medical

and

musical

 eauipment. including, but not limited

the

following:

computers.

monitors,

printers

and

keyboards.

facsimile machines, copiers. microfiche readers. cellular and

standard

phones,

and

pencil

sharpeners.

This

definition

 excludes

internal electrical components of business machines.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

effective

____

Section

211.980

 Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit

“Chemical manufacturing Process unit” means the equipment

assembled

and

connected

pipes

ducts

Process

raw

materials

and

 manufacture an intended product.

 For purposes

Ill.

Adm.

 Code Section

218.43.

through

218.436.

and

Sections

219.431

throucrh

219.436.

the

 chemical manufacturing

process unit includes reactors and their associated product

separators and recovery devices; distillation units and their

associated distillate receivers and recovery devices.

 A chemical

manufacturing process unit includes, but

 not limited to, any

combination of pumps. compressors. acritators, pressure relief

 devices, sampling connection systems. open ended valves or lines.

valves,

 connectors, instrumentation systems, and control devices

systems.

chemical

manufacturing

Process

unit

 identified

its

primary

product.

 defined in Section

211.5060

this

Part.

(Source:

 Added

_____

 Ill. Reg.

 effective

Section 211.1780

 Distillation Unit

“Distillation unit” means a device or vessel in which one or more

feed streams are separated into two or more exit streams. each

exit stream having component concentrations different from those

40

in the feed stream(s).

 Separation is achieved by a

redistribution of the components between the liquid and the vapor

phases

vaporization

and

condensation

they

approach

equilibrium within the distillation unit.

 A distillation unit

includes, but is not limited to. the distillate receiver.

reboiler. vacuum

Pump.

steam

let

 and any associated recovery

system.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

 effective

____

______________________________________________________)

Section

211.1880

Electromagnetic

Interference/Radio

Frequency

Interference (EMI/RFI) Shielding Coatings

“Electromagnetic

mt

erference/radio frequency interference

(EMI/RFI)

 coatings” means coatings used on busmess machine

plastic housings to attenuate electromagnetic and radio frequency

interference signals that would otherwise pass through the

plastic housing.

Ill.

Reg.

)

Electrostatic

Prep

Coat

effective

(Source:

Added

Section

211.1900

‘*4

~fr’

a~..

“Electrostatic prep coat” means a coating that is applied to a

plastic part solely to provide conductivity for the subseauent

~rw~1

‘-~

 of a prime coat, a

 or o~’qrcoating throug)~

the use of electrostatic application methods.

 An electrostatic

prep coat is dearly identified as an electrostatic prep coat on

its accompanying material safety data sheet.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

effective

____

___________________________________________________________)

Section

211.2290

Fermentation

Time

“Fermentation

time”

means

the

 time elapsed between adding yeast

the

dough

and

placina

the

product

into

the

oven.

expressed

hours

the

nearest

one—tenth

hour.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

__________,

 effective

____

______________________________________________________ )

Section 211.2360

 Flexible Coating

“Flexible coating” means a paint with the ability to withstand

dimensional changes.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

__________,

 effective

____

_______________________________________________________)

Section 211.2365

 Flexible Operation Unit

“Flexible operation unit” means a chemical manufacturing process

unit that manufactures different chemical products periodically

by alternating raw materials or operating conditions.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

__________,

effective

____

______________________________________________________)

Section

211.2630

Gloss

 Reducers

“Gloss

reducers”

means

low—gloss

coating

formulated

eliminate glare for safety ~u~poses ~n interior surfaces of a

vehicle,

specified

the

U.S.

DeDartment

Transportation

Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

 effective

____

______________________________________________________)

Section

211.4055

Non—Flexible

Coating

“Non-flexible

coating”

means

paint

without

the

ability

withstand

dimensional

changes.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,.effective

____

_________)

Section 211.4740

 Plastic Part

“Plastic part” means a product, or piece of a product, made from

a substance that has been formed from resin through the

application of pressure or heat or both.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg

effective

)

Section

211.5060

Primary

Product

“Primary Product” means

product

ch.~mica1 manufacturing

process

unit

that

shall

determined

according

the

procedures

specified as follows:

chemical

manufacturing

 process unit produces more

than

one

intended

chemical

product,

the

product

with

the

greatest

annual

design

capacity

mass

basis

determines

the

primary

product_of

the

process.

~

 If a chemical manufacturing process unit has

two

products that have the same maximum annual design

capacity

mass

basis

and

one

those

chemicals

listed

Appendix

Ill.

Mm.

Code

218

219. then the listed chemical is considered the prima~y

product.

than

one

the

products

listed

Appendix

Iii.

Adin.

Code

218

219,

then

the

owner

operator

may

designate

the

primary

product

any

the

listed

chemicals.

42

~

 For a chemical manufacturing process unit that is

designed

and

operated

flexible

operation

unit

and

used predominantly to produce one or more of the listed

chemicals in Appendix A of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218 or

219. the primary product shall be determined based on

the expected utilization for the five years following

promulgation for existing sources and based on the

e~ectedutilization for the first five years after

initial start—up for new sources.

fl.

the

 flexible operation unit produces one

product

for

the

areatest

 annual operating time,

then_that

product

shall

represent

the

primary

product of the flexible operation unit.

the

 flexible operation unit produces multiple

chemicals

equally

based

 on operating time, then

the

product

with

the

greatest

annual

 production on

mass

basis

shall

represent

the

primary

 product

of the flexible operation unit.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

 effective

______________________________________________________ )

Section

211.5480

Reflective

Ar~ent

Coating

“Reflective argent coating” means a silver—colored coating that

will

reflect

light.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

effective

____

__________________________________________________ )

Section

211.5600

Resist

Coat

“Resist

coat”

means

 a coating that is applied to a plastic cart

before metallic plating to prevent deposits of metal on portions

of the plastic part.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

 effective

____

_______________________________________________________)

Section

211.6060

Soft

Coat

“Soft coat” means any coating that provides a soft tactile feel

similar to leather and a rich leather—like appearance when

applied to plastic interior automotive parts and exterior

business machine parts.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

effective

____

Section 211.6140

 Specialty Coatings

“Specialty

coatings”

means,

for

the

purposes

Ill.

Adin.

 Code

218

and

219.

~1astic

 parts coatings used for unusual lob

performance

requirements.

These

products

include

 adhesion

primers,

resist

coatings,

soft

coatings,

reflective

coatings,

electrostatic

prep

coatings,

headlamp

lens

 coatings,

 ink ~ad

printing coatings, stencil coatings, vacuum metallizing coatings.

gloss

reducers,

plating

resist

coatings,

and

plating

sensitizer

coatings.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

 effective

____

______________________________________________________)

Section

211.6400

Stencil

Coat

“Stencil

coat”

means

coating

that

 is applied over a stencil on

plastic

part

thickness

mil

less

coating

solids.

Stencil

coats

are

most

 frequently letters, numbers, or decorative

designs.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

effective

____

______________________________________________________)

Section 211.6580

 Texture Coat

“Texture coat” means a

coating

applied

plastic

part

which.

in

its

finished

form,

consists

discrete

raised

spots

the

coating.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

 effective

____

______________________________________________________)

Section 211.6880

 Vacuum Metallizing

“Vacuum metallizing” means a process whereby metal is vaporized

and

deposited

substrate

vacuum

chamber.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

 effective

____

______________________________________________________ )

Section 211.7400

 Yeast Percentage

“Yeast percentage” means lbs of yeast ~er hundred lbs of total

flour

the

recipe,

expressed

percentage.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

 effective

____

______________________________________________________)

TITLE

35:

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION

SUBTITLE B:

 AIR POLLUTION

CHAPTER I:

 POLLUTION CONTROL

BOARD

SUBCHAPTER

C:

 EMISSIONS

STANDARDS

AND

 LIMITATIONS

FOR

STATIONARY

SOURCES

PART

218

ORGANIC

MATERIAL

EMISSION

STANDARDS

AND

LIMITATIONS

FOR

THE

CHICAGO AREA

SUBPART A:

 GENERAL

PROVISIONS

Section

218.106

 Compliance Dates

Emission

Limitations

Daily-Weighted Average Limitations

Alternative Emission Limitations

Exemptions from Emission Limitations

Compliance Schedule

Cross-Line Averaging to Establish Compliance for

Coating Lines

218.213

 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Cross-Line Averaging

Participating Coating Lines

218.214

 Changing Compliance Methods

SUBPART

LEAKS

FROH

SYNTHETIC

ORGANIC

CHEMICAL

AND

 POLYMER

MANUFACTURING

PLANT

Section

218.431

218.432

218.433

218

434

218.435

218.436

Section

218.686

Applicability

Control Reauirements

Performance and Testing Requirements

Monitoring Requirements

Recordkee~ing

and

Reporting

Requirements

Compliance

Date

SUBPART

DD:

AEROSOL

CAN

FILLING

Control Requirements

SUBPART

FF:

BAKERY

OVENS

Section

218.720

218.722

218.726

218.727

218.728

218.729

218.730

Applicability

Control Requirements

Testing

Monitoring

Recordkeeping and Reporting

Compliance Date

Certification

SUBPART

RR:

 MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC

CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING

PROCESSES

SUBPART

COATING

OPERATIONS

Section

218.204

2 18.205

218.207

218. 208

218.210

218.212

Section

218.966

control

Requirements

SUBPART

TI:

OTHER

EMISSION

UNITS

Section

218.980

 Applicability

~iofl21S.ACflQiXG~

IRE

ma~

Measurements

for

SOCMI

Reactors

and

Distillation

Units

~seline

VOM

Content

 Limitations

for

~part

 Section

218.212

 Cross—Line

Averagina

AUTHORITY:

 IinP.ementing Section 10 and authorized

by

Section

~

ti~

Unvjroflmer-itaJ

Protect~cn

I’.CL

+~*~—$t-~4±~99±r

26

1~

92)

1415

ILCS

5/10

arid

2851

SOURCE:

Adopted

R91—7

Il1~

Reg.

12231,

effective

August

16,

1991;

amended

R91—23

111.

Reg.

13564,

effective

August

24,

 1992; amended

 in R91-28 and R91-30 at 16 Iii.

 Reg.

13864,

 effective August 24,

 1992; amended

 in R93—9

at

 17 Ill.

Reg.

 16636,

 effective September 27,

 1993;

 amended in R9314

at

Ill.

 Reg.

 1945,

 effective January 24,

 1994; amended

 in R94—12 at

Iii.

Reg.

14973,

effective

September

21,

1994;

amended

R94—

Iii.

Reg.

 16392,

 effective October

25,

 1994;

 amended

in

R94—16

Ill.

Reg.

16950,

effective

November

15,

1994;

amended

R94—21

Ill.

Reg.

_____

 effective

SUBPART

GENERAL

PROVISIONS

Section

218.106

Compliance

Dates

Except

 ~herwise

provided

this

Section

21&.106

+e+—~e-~-ewor

 as otherwise provided

specific

Subpart

this

Part,

compliance

with

the

requirements

all

rules

req-uired

July

1991,

September

1991,

for

all

sources

located

Cook,

DuPage,

 Kane,

Lake,

NcHenry

W111

Counties,

consistent

with

the

appropriate

provisions

Section

218.103

this

Part

~rt.

Except

otherwise

provided

this

Section

 218.lG~6

~—~e-~

otherwise

provided

specific

Subpart

this

Part,

compliance

with

the

requirements

this

Part

reauired

November

15,

 1993,

 for all

sources located

in Aux Sable Township or

Goose

Lake

Township

in Grundy county or

in Oswego Township

in

Nendall County.

46

C)

All

emission

units

which

meet

 the applicability

requirements

Sections

218.402(a)

(2),

218.611(b),

218.620(b),

218.660(a),

218.680(a),

218.920(b),

218.940(b),

 218.960(b)

 or 218.980(b)

 of this Part,

including emission units at sources which are excluded

from the applicability criteria of Sections

218.402(a) (1), 218.611(a), 218.620(a),

 218.920(a),

218.940(a), 218.960(a), or 218.980(a) of this Part by

virtue of permit conditions or other enforceable means,

must

comply

 with the requirements of Subparts H,

 Z, AA,

CC,

DD,

PP,

QQ,

this

Part,

respectively,

March

15,

1995.

Any

owner

operator

emission

unit

which

has

already

met

the

 applicability

requirements

Sections

218.402

(a)

(1),

218.611(a),

218.620(a),

218.920(a),

218.940(a),

218.960(a),

218.980(a)

 of this Part on or by the effective date of

this

subsection

required

comply

with

all

compliance dates or schedules found in Sections

218.106(a)

 or 218.106(b)

above,

 as applicable.

Any

owner

operator

source

with

emission

unit

subject

the

requirements

Section

218.204

(m)

(2)

(m)

(3)

this

Part

shall

comely

with

those

requirements

March

25,

1995.

(Source:

Amended

_____

Ill.

Reg.

 effective —

_________________________________________________________)

SUBPART F:

 COATING OPERATIONS

Section 218.204

 Emission Limitations

Except

provided

Sections

218.205,

218.207

a~4

.

 218.208

and 218.212 of this rart Subpart, no owner or operator of a

coating line shall apply at any time any coating in which the VOM

content exceeds the following emission limitations for the

specified coating.

 Compliance with the emission limitations

marked

with

asterisk

this

Section

required

and

after

March 15.

 1996.

 Compliance with emission limitations not marked

with

asterisk

required

until

March

15,

1996.

The

following

emission

limitations

are

 expressed in

units

VOM

per

volume

coating

 (minus water and any compounds which are specifically

exempted from the definition of VON) as applied at each coating

applicator, except where noted.

 Compounds which are specifically

 exempted from the definition of VON should be treated as water

for the purpose of calculating the “less water” part of the

coating composition.

 Compliance with this Subpart must be

demonstrated through the applicable coating analysis test methods

and procedures specified in Section 218.105(a)

 of this Part and

the

record)~eeping

and

reporting

requirements

specified

Section

218.211(c)

 of this Part Subpart except where noted.

 (Note:

The

equation

presented

Section

218.206

this

Part

shall

used

calculate

emission

limitations

for

 determining compliance by

add-on controls, credits for transfer efficiency, emissions

trades

and

cross—line

averaging.)

The

emission

limitations

are

as follows:

Automobile

Light-Duty

kg/i

lb/gal

Truck Coating

1)

 Prime coat

 0.14

 (1.2)

0.14*

(1.2I~

Primer

surface

coat

1.81

(15.1)

1.81*

(15.1)~

(Note:

The

primer

surface

coat

limitation

units

(ibs)

VON

per

(gal)

 coating

solids

deposited.

Compliance

with

the

limitation

shall

based

the

 daily-weighted average from

entire

primer

surfacer

operation.

Compliance

shall

demonstrated

 accordance with the

topcoat

protocol

referenced

Section

218.105(b)

and

the

recordkeeping

and

reporting

requirements

specified

Section

218.211(f).

Testing

demonstrate

compliance

shall

performed

accordance

with

 the topcoat protocol and a

detailed

 testing proposal approved by the Agency

and

USEPA

specifying

the

method

demonstrating

compliance

with

the

 protocol. Section 218.205 does

not

apply

the

primer

surface

 limitation.)

kg/i

lb/gal

Topcoat

1.81

(15.1)

1.81*

(15.1)*

(Note:

The

topcoat

 limitation is in

units

(lbs)

VON

per

(gal)

coating

solids

deposited.

 Compliance with the limitation shall

based

the

daily—weighted

average

from

entire

topcoat

operation.

Compliance

shall

demonstrated

accordance

with

the

topcoat

protocol

referenced

Section

218.105(b)

this

Part

and

the

recordkeeping

and

 reporting

requirements specified in Section 218.211(f).

Testing to demonstrate compliance shall be

performed in accordance with the topcoat protocol

and a detailed testing proposal approved by the

Agency and USEPA specifying the method of

demonstrating compliance with the protocol.

Section 218.205 of this Part does not apply to the

topcoat limitation.)

kg/i

 lb/gal

Final

repair

coat

0.58

(4.8)

0.58*

f4.8~*

b)

 Can Coating

 kg/i

 lb/gal

48

I)

Sheet

basecoat

and

overvarnish

A)

 Sh~~

~aseco~t

 0.34~

_____

•

0.26*

~

 v?::r

 ?L.~

1~1

O~34L

______

2)

 Exterior basecoat and

overvarnish

0.34

(2.8)

0.25*

 (2.1)*

3)

 Interior body spray coat 0.51

—

Two

piece

0.51

(4.2)

0.44*

(3.7)*

Three

piece

0.5?

0.51*

(4.21*

 Exterior end coat

 0.51

 (4.2)

0.51*

14.21*

5)

Side

seam

spray

coat

0.66

(5.5)

0.66*

 (5.5)*

End

sealing

0.44

(3.7)

compound

coat

0.44*

(3.7)

kg/i

lb/gal

Paper

Coating

0.35

(2.9)

0.28*

(2.31*

(Note:

The

paper

 coating

limitation

shall

not

apply

any

owner

operator

any

paper

coating

line

which

printing

performed

 if the paper coating line

complies

with

 the emissions limitations

 in Subpart H:

Printing

and

Publishing,

Section

218.401

this

Part.)

kg/i

lb/gal

Coil

Coating

0.31

(2.6)

0.20*

(1.71*

Fabric

Coating

0.35

(2.9)

0.28*

(2.3)*

Vinyl

Coating

0.45

(3.8)

0.28*

(2.3)*

Metal

Furniture

Coating

 C.2~

1)

Air

dried

0.36

 (3.01

0.34*

 (2.81*

Baked

Large Appliance Coating

dried

•

0.34*

~j_~ed

0. 34

0.28*

(Note:

The

limitation

shall

not

apply

the

use

quick-drying

 lacquers for

repair

scratches

and

nicks

that

occur

during

assembly,

provided

that

the

volume

coating

does

not

exceed

0.95

quart)

any

one

rolling

eight-hour

period.)

Magnet

Wire

Coating

Miscellaneous

Metal

Parts

and

products Coating

Clear

coating

0.52

Air-dricd

eootin;

0.42

~2)

Extreme

performance

0.42—

coating

Air

dried

0.42

0.42*

B)

 Baked

43)

Steel

pail

and

drum

interior coating

~54)

All

other

coatings

~j.

 Air Dried

Baked

0.42

Q_~~4Q:~i

(3

.51

~

0.52

(4 .3)

0.52*

(4 .31k

0.36

(3 .0)

0.36

_____

 (2.8~

~42*

0.36

0.28~

(3.0)

(2.8)

kg/i

0.20

0.20*

lb/gal

(1.7)

(4.3)

(3.5)

.

 ~:.4~:

_____

(~

~\*

‘-~

•

_______

•

_________

____

~

:~cc~t

_______

____

 (4.3)

(4.

:~:i

 •~i.~~c:

_____

•

(;

 4’*

(~3

‘•;‘~*

•

.~.~

L2

U)

L~.

~

~

“(

r

—

?~ç~t~j-~c

~tn

~

an

~

çç~~ng,

 for th~

~it.~Jt~

~n~r2~~L

 r~Ic.

t~ç

j~~)~’

c~-

‘~

 ~-ul’~c~tic’p

21~

‘04(jiI5)

~ ~t~r—born~

dip

cct

i’a

 .jr--~

 ~ç~j~ppposite

..ubs~rat.--

e

 .--.~..

•

•.

or~-.

~-“

t:c~:u

th-

-~h-~t

~-.‘

••

-fl

•

~

r~c~’cccf

-.r~-~ct~cn2i8

2O4(~~)

0±

~

 rryvr~i~ r~~r~c’e

___

 ztom

 2i~.2O4i~(6~z~f

o~m~1~a1pa~t~te~

~.app~i~4.

Heavy

Off-Highway

Vehicle

kg/i

lb/gal

Products

Coating

Extreme

performance

0.42

(3.5)

prime

coat

0.42*

(3.5)*

Extreme

performance

top—

0.42

(3.5)

coat

(air

dried)

0.42*

(3.5)*

Final

repair

coat

0.42

(3.5)

(air

dried)

0.42*

(3.5)*

4)

 All other coatings are subject to the emission

 limitations for miscellaneous metal parts and

products coatings in subsection

(j)

 above.

Wood

Furniture

Coating

kg/i

lb/gal

Clear

topcoat

0.67

(5.6)

0.67*

______

Opaque

stain

0.56

(4.7)

0.56*

(4.7)*

Pigmented

coat

0.60

(5.0)

0.60*

(5.0)*

Repair

coat

0.67

(5.6)

0.67*

(5.6)*

Sealer

0.67

(5.6)

0.67*

(5.6)*

Semi—transparent

stain

0.79

(6.6)

0.79*

(6.6)*

Wash

coat

0.73

(6.1)

Q73*

 (6.1)*

(Note:

An

owner

or operator of a wood furniture

coating operation subject to this Section shall

apply all coatings, with the exception of no more

than 37.8 1

 (10 gal)

 of coating per day used for

touch—up and repair operations, using one or more

of the following application systems:

 airless

spray application system, air—assisted airless

spray application system, electrostatic spray

application system, electrostatic bell or disc

spray

application

system,

heated

airless

spray

application

system,

roller

coating,

brush

wipe

coating

application

system,

dip

coating

application

system

high

volume

low

pressure

(HVLP)

application

system.)

in)

Existing

Diesel-Electric

 Locomotive Coating Lines

in

Cook

County

kg/i

lb/gal

Extreme

performance

prime

coat

0,42

(3.5)

0.42*

(3.5)*

Extreme

performance

top-

coat

 (air dried)

 0.42

 (3.5)

0.42*

(3.5’i*

Final

repair

coat

(air

dried)

0.42

(3.5)

0.42*

13.5)*

4)

 High-temperature aluminum

coating

 0.72

 (6.0)

0.72*

______

All

other

coatings

0.36

(3.0)

0.36*

(3.0)*

fli

Plastic

Parts

Coating:

Automotive/Transportation

kgf 1

lb/~al

fl

Interiors

~j

 Baked

ii

 Color coat

 0.49*

 (4.1)*

j~j)

Primer

0.46*

(3.8)*

~J..

Air

Dried

LL

Color

coat

0.38*

(3.2)*

ii)

 Primer

 0.42*

(3.5j~

~J..

 Exteriors

 (flexible

and non—flexible)

~j..

Baked

jj..

Primer

0.60*

(5.0)*

ii)

Primer

non—

0.54

*

 (4.5)

flexible

iii)

Clear

coat

0.52*

(4~3)*

j~j

Color

coat

0.55*

(4.61*

~j.

Air

Dried

ji.

Primer

0.66*

(5.5)*

iii

Clear

coat

0.54*

(4.5)*

iii)

Color

coat

0.67*

(5.61*

(red

black)

Lu.

Color

coat

(others)

0.61*

(5.1)*

~j

 Specialty

~j

 Vacuum metallizing

 0.66*

 (5,,5)*

basecoats. texture

basecoats

~j

 Black coatings.

 0.71*

 (5.9)*

reflective

arcient

coatings. air

bag cover coatings,

and soft coatings

Qj

 Gloss reducers.

 0.77*

 (6.41*

vacuum metallizing

topcoats,

and

texture topcoats

~

 Stencil coatings.

 0.82*

 (6.8)*

adhesion primers,

ink ~ad coatings.

electrostatic prep

coatings, and resist

 coatings

~

 Head lamp lens

 0.89*

 (7.4)*

coatings

Plastic

Parts

Coating:

Business

Machine

kci/l

lb/gal

fl

Primer

0.14*

(1.2)*

Color

coat

(non-

0.28*

(23)*

texture

coat)

Color

coat

(texture

0.28*

(2.3)*

coat)

Electromagnetic

0.48*

(4.0)*

interference/radio

frequency interference

(EMI/RFI)

shielding

coatings

~

 Specialty Coatincis

~j

 Soft coat

 0.52*

 (4.3)*

flj,.

Plating

resist

0.71*

(5.9)*

ci

 Plating

sensitizer

0.85*

(7.1)*

(Source:

Amended

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

effective

___________________________________________________________ )

Section

218.205

 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations

owner

operator

coating

line

subject

the

limitations

Section

218.204

this

PartSubpart

and

complying

means

this

Section

shall

operate

the

subject

coating

line

unless

the

owner

operator

has

 demonstrated compliance with subsection

(a),

(b),

(c),

(d),

(e)~..e~ (f).

(ci),

(hI

(i)

this

Section

(depending

upon

the

 category of coating) through the applicable

coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in Section

218.105(a)

 of this Part and the recordkeeping and reporting

requirements

specified

Section

218.211(d)

this

PartSubpart:

a)

 No owner or operator of a coating line subject to only

one of the limitations from among Section

218.204(a)(1),

 (a)(4),

 (c),

 (d),

 (e),

 (f),

 (g),

 (h), or

(i)

this

PartSubpart

shall

apply

coatings

any

such

coating

line,

during

any

day,

whose

daily-weighted

average

VOM

 content exceeds the emission limitation to

which

the

coatings

are

subject.

owner

operator

miscellaneous

metal

parts

and

products coating line subject to the limitations of

Section 218.204(j) of this PartSubpart

shall

apply

coatings to

 miscellaneous metal parts or products on

the subject coating line unless the requirements in

subsection

(b)

(1)

(b) (2)

b~-1owofthis

Section

are

met.

1)

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings,

all

which

are

subject

the

same

numerical

emission

limitation

within

Section

218.204(j)

during

the

same

day

(e.g.,

all

coatings

used

the

line

are

subject

0.42

kg/i

(3.5

lbs/gal),

the

daily-weighted

average

VOM

content

shall

not

exceed

the

coating

VON

 content limit

corresponding

the

category

coating

used,

For

each

 coating line

which

applies

coatings

subject

than

one

numerical

emission

limitation

Section

218.204(j)

abovcof

this

Subpart,

during

the

same

day,

the

owner

operator

shall

have

site—specific

proposal

approved

the

Agency

and

approved

the

USEPA

SIP

revision.

 To receive approval, the

requirements

 USEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy

Statement

(and

policy)

Fed.

Reg.

43814

(December

1986),

must

satisfied.

owner

operator

of-a

can

coating

line

subject

the limitations of Section 218.204(b)

 of this

PartSubpart

shall

operate

the

subject

coating

line

using a coating with a VON content in excess of the

limitations

specified

Section

218.204(b)

this

PartSubpart unless all of the following requirements

are

met:

alternative

daily

emission

limitation

shall

determined

for

the

can

coating

operation,

i.e.

for

all

the

can

coating

lines

the

source,

according to subsection

 (C) (2) belowof this

Section.

 Actual daily emissions shall never

exceed the alternative daily emission limitation

and

shall

calculated

use

the

following

equation.

n

Ed

=

1=1

where:

=

Actual

VON

emissions

for

the

day

units

kg/day

(lbs/day);

i

=

 Subscript denoting a specific coating

applied;

n

=

 Total number of coatings applied in the

can coating operation,

 i.e.

 all can

coating

lines

the

source;

=

Volume

each

coating

 applied for the

day

units

i/day

(gal/day)

coating

(minus

water

and

any

 compounds

which

are

specifically

exempted

from

the

definition

VON);

=

The

VOM

content

each

 coating as

applied

units

VOM/l

(lbs

VOM/gal)

coating

(minus

water

and

any

 compounds

which

are

specifically

exempted from the definition of VON).

The

alternative

daily

emission

limitation

 (Ad)

shall

determined

for

the

can

coating

operation,

i.e.

for

all

the

can

 coating lines at the

source,

daily

basis

follows:

n

2

V~

L1

(D1

 -C11

i=.

(D1

—

L1)

where:

=

The

VON

emissions

allowed

for

the

day

units

kg/day

(lbs/day);

=

Subscript

denoting

specific

coating

applied;

=

 Total number

surface

coatings

applied

the

can

coating

operation;

=

The

VON

content

each

surface

coating

as applied in units of kg VON/i

 (lbs

VON/gal) of coating

 (minus water and any

compounds which are specifically

exempted

from

the

definition

VON);

D1

=

 The density of VON in each coating

applied.

 For the purposes of

calculating

 Ad, the density is

0.882 kg VON/i VOM

 (7.36

lbs

VON/gal

VON);

=

Volume

 each surface coating applied

for

the

day

units

(gal)

coating

(minus

water

and

any

 compounds

which

are

specifically

exempted

from

the

definition

VON);

=

The

VON

 emission limitation for each

surface coating applied as specified in

Section 218.204(b) of this PartSub~art

in units of kg VON/i

 (lbs VON/gal) of

coating (minus water and any compounds

which

are

specifically

exempted

from

the

definition

VON).

owner

operator

heavy

off—highway

vehicle

products

coating

line

subject

the

limitations

Section

218.204(k)

this

r~rtSubpart

shall

apply

coatings

heavy

off-highway

vehicle

 products on the

subject coating line unless the requirements of

subsection

 (d) (1) or

 (d) (2) belowof this Section are

met.

1)

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all of which are subject to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

218.204(k)

 aboveof this Subpart, during the same

day

 (e.g., all coatings used on the line are

subject

0.42

kg/l

3.5

 lbs/gal),

the

daily-weighted average VON content shall not

exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding

to the category of coating used,

or

2)

 For each coating line which applies coatings

subject to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 218.204(k)

 aboveof this

Subpart, during the same day, the owner or

operator shall have a site specific proposal

approved by the Agency and approved by the USEPA

as a SIP revision.

 To receive approval, the

requirements of USEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy

Statement (and related policy)

 51 Fed. Req. 43814

(December

4,

 1986), must be satisfied.

e)

 No owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line

subject to the limitations of Section 218.204(1) of

this PartSubpart shall apply coatings to wood furniture

on the subject coating line unless the requirements of

subsection

 (e) (1)

 or subsection

 (e) (2) belowof this

Section, in addition to the requirements specified in

the note to Section 218.204(1) of this PartSubpart,

are

met.

1)

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings,

 all of which are subject to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

218.204(1) abovcof this Subpart, during the same

day

 (e.g., all coatings used on the line are

subject to 0.67 kg!1

5.6

 lbs/gal)), the

daily—weighted average VON content shall not

exceed the coating VON content limit corresponding

to the category of coating used,

or

2)

 For each coating line which applies coatings

subject to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 218.204(1) abovcof this

Subpart, during the same day, the owner or

operator shall have a site specific proposal

approved by the Agency and approved by the USEPA

as a SIP revision.

 To receive approval, the

requirements of IJSEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy

Statement (and related policy)

 51 Fed. Reg. 43814

(December 4,

 1986), must be satisfied.

58

f)

owner

operator

existing

diesel—electric

locomotive coating line in Cook County, subject to the

limitations of Section 218.204(m) of this rartsubpart

shall

apply

coatings

diesel-electric

locomotives

the

subject

 coating line unless the requirements of

subsection

(f)

(1)

(f)

(2)

this

Section

are

met.

For

 each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all

which

are

subject

the

same

numerical emission limitation within Section

218.204(m) aboveof this Subpart, during the same

day

(e.g.,

all

coatings

used

the

line

are

subject

0.42

kg/l

3.5

lbs/gal)),

the

daily-weighted

average

VON

content

shall

not

exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding

the

category

 of coating used,

or

For

each

coating

line

which

applies

coatings

subject to more than one numerical emission

limitation

Section

218.204(m)

abovcof

this

Subpart,

during

the

same

day,

the

owner

operator shall have a site specific proposal

approved by the Agency and approved by the USEPA

SIP

revision.

receive

approval,

the

requirements

USEPA’s

 Emissions Trading Policy

Statement

(and

policy)

must

satisfied.

.gI

owner

operator

plastic

parts

coating

line,

subject

the

limitations

Section

218.204(n)

(0)

this

Subpart

shall

apply

coatings

business

machine or automotive/transportation plastic parts on

the

subject

coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

(ci) (1)

(ci) (2)

this

Section

are

met:

jj~.

For

each

coating

line

which

applies

multiple

coatings, all of which are subject to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

218.204(n)

(0)

this

Subpart.

during

the

same

day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are

subject to 0.42 kci/i 3.5

 lbs/pall),

the

daily-weighted average VON content shall not

exceed the coating VON content limit corresponding

the

category

 of coating used; or

~

 For each coating line which applies coatings

subject to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 218.204(n) or

(0)

 of this

Subpart, during the same day. the owner or

operator shall have a site specific ~ro~osa1

approved

the

Agency

and

approved

the

USEPA

as_a_SIP

revision.

receive

approval,

the

requirements of USEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy

Statement

(and

policy)

must

 satisfied.

~

 No owner or operator of a metal furniture coating line.

subject to the limitations of Section 218.204(g)

of

this Subpart shall apply coatings on the subject

coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

(hI (1)

(hI (2)

this

Section

are

met:

~3j

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all of which are subject to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

218 .204 (gI

this

Subpart.

during

the

same

day

(e.g.. all coatings used on the line are subject

to 0.34 kg/i 2.8

 lbs/gall), the daily—weighted

average

VON

content

shall

not

exceed

the

coating

VOM

content

limit

corresponding

the

category

coating used; or

~

For

each

coating

line

which

applies

coatings

subject

than

one

numerical

emission

limitation

Section

218.204(gl

this

Subpart.

during

the

same

day,

the

owner

operator

shall

have a site specific ~ro~osal approved by the

Agency and approved by the USEPA as a SIP

revision.

 To receive approval. the recruirements

USEPA’S

Emissions

Trading

Policy

Statement

(and

related policy) must be satisfied.

fl

owner

 or operator of a larcie appliance coating line,

subject

the

 limitations of Section 218.204(h) of

this

Subpart

shall

a~plv coatings

the

subiect

coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

(i)

(1)

(il

(2)

this

Section

are

met:

For

 each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all of which are subject to the same

numerical

 emission limitation within Section

218.204(h)

this

Subpart,

during

the

same

day

(e.g..

all

coatings

used

the

line

are

subject

0.34

kg/i

12.8

lbs/gall),

the

daily—weighted

average

VON

content

shall

not

exceed

the

coating

VON content limit corresponding to the category of

coating

used,

For

each

coating

line

which

applies

coatings

subject to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 218.204(h) of this Subpart.

during

the

same

day.

the

owner

operator

shall

have

site

specific

proposal

approved

the

Agency and approved by the USEPA as a SIP

revision.

 To receive approval, the requirements

of USEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and

oolicy)

must

satisfied.

(Source:

Amended

_____

Xli.

Reg.

 effective

—

I

60

Section 218.207

 Alternative Emission Limitations

a)

Any

owner

operator

coating

line

subject

Section 218.204 of this PartSub~artmay comply with

this Section, rather than with Section 218.204 of this

PartSubpart,

 if a capture system and control device are

operated at all times the coating line is in operation

and the owner or operator demonstrates compliance with

subsection

 (c),

 (d),

 (e),

 (f), (g)~e~(h).

 (il.

 (1),

(k)

this

Section

(depending

upon

the

source

category)

through

the

 applicable coating analysis and

capture

system

and

control

device

efficiency

test

methods and procedures specified in Section 218.105 of

this Part

and

the

recordkeeping

and

reporting

requirements specified in Section 218.211(e)

 of this

PartSubpart; and the control device is equipped with

the

applicable

monitoring

equipment

specified

in

Section 218.105(d)

 of this Part and the monitoring

equipment is installed, calibrated, operated and

maintained

according

vendor

specifications

all

times

the

control

device

 use.

 A capture system

and control device, which does

not

demonstrate

compliance with subsection

(C),

 (d),

 (e),

 (f),

 (g),.. e~

(h),

 (il.

 (1).

or

(kI

 of this Section may be used as an

alternative to compliance with Section 218.204 of this

PartSubpart only if the alternative is approved by the

Agency and approved by the USEPA as a SIP revision.

b)

 Alternative Add-On Control Methodologies

1)

 The coating line is equipped with a capture system

and control device that provides 81 percent

reduction in the overall emissions of VON from the

coating line and the control device has a 90

percent efficiency,

or

2)

The

system

used

control

VON

from

the

coating

line is demonstrated to have an overall efficiency

sufficient

limit

VON

emissions

than

what is allowed under Section 218.204 of this

PartSubpart.

Use

any

control

system

other

than

an afterburner, carbon adsorption, condensation,

or absorption scrubber system can be allowed only

approved

the

Agency

and

approved

the

USEPA

SIP

revision.

The

use

transfer

efficiency

credits

can

allowed

only

 approved

the

Agency

and

approved

the

T.JSEPA

SIP

revision.

 Baseline transfer efficiencies and

transfer efficiency test methods must be approved

by

the Agency and the USEPA.

Such overall efficiency is to be determined as

follows:

Obtain

the

emission

limitation

from

the

appropriate subsection in Section 218.204 of

this PartSubpart

B)

 Calculate “S” according to the equation in

Section

218.206

this

P~artSubpart;

C)

 Calculate the overall efficiency required

according to Section 218.105(e) of this Part.

For

the

purposes

calculating

this

value,

according

the

 equation in Section

218.105(e)

(2)

this

Part,

VON1

equal

the value of “S” as determined above in

subsection

(b)

(2)

(B)

this

Section.

c)

 No owner or operator of

 a coating line subject to only

one

the

emission

limitations

from

among

Section

218.204(a)(1),

(a)(4),

(c),

(d),

(e),

(f),

(g),

(h)

(i)

this

PartSubpart

and

equipped

with

 capture

system and control device shall operate the subject

coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

(b) (1)

(b) (2)

aboveof

this

Section

are

met.

owner or operator of a coating line subject to Section

218.204 (a) (2)

 or 218.204(a)

(3)

and

equipped

with

capture system and control device shall operate the

 coating line unless the owner or operator demonstrates

compliance

with

such

limitation

accordance

with

the

topcoat

protocol

referenced

Section

218.105(b).

d)

 No owner or operator of a miscellaneous metal parts and

products coating line which applies one or more

coatings during the same day, all of which are subject

the

same

numerical

emission

limitation

within

Section

218.204(j)

this

PartSubpart

(e.g.,

all

coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/i 3.5

lbs/gal)),

and

which

 equipped with a capture system

and

control

device

shall

operate

the

subject

coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

(b) (1)

(b) (2)

aboveof

this

Section

are

met.

owner

operator

heavy

off—highway

vehicle

products coating line which applies one or more

coatings during the same day, all of which are subject

to the same numerical emission limitation within

Section

218.204(k)

this

PartSubpart

(e.g.,

all

coatings

used

the

line

are

subject

0.42

kg/i

3.5

lbs/gal),

 and which is equipped with a capture system

and

control

device

shall

operate

the

subject

 coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

(b) (1)

(b) (2)

aboveof

this

Section

are

met.

f)

 No owner or operator of an existing

diesel—electric

locomotive coating line in Cook County which applies

one or more coatings during the same day, all of which

62

are

subject

the

same

numerical

emission

limitation

within Section 218.204(m)

 of this PartSubpart

 (e.g.,

all

coatings

used

the

line

are

subject

0.42

kg/i

(3.5

lbs/gal)),

and

which

equipped

with

capture

system

and

control

device

shall

operate

the

subject

coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

(b) (1)

(b)

(2)

aboveof

this

Section

are

met.

owner

operator

wood

furniture

coating

line

which applies one or more coatings during the same day,

all

which

are

subject

the

same

 numerical emission

limitation

within

Section

218.204(1)

this

PartSubpart

(e.g.,

all

coatings

used

the

line

are

subject

0.67

kg/i

5.6

lbs/gal)),

and

which

equipped with a capture system and control device shall

operate

the

subject

coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

(b)

(1)

(b) (2)

this

Section

are

met.

 compliance is

achieved

meeting

the

requirements

subsection

(b) (2)

this

PartSection,

then

the

provisions

the

note

Section

218.204(1)

this

PartSubpart

must

also

met.

owner

operator

can

coating

line

which

equipped

with

capture

system

and

control

device

shall

operate

the

subject

coating

 line unless the

requirements in subsection

 (h) (1)

or

 (h) (2)

bclow~f

this Section are met.

1)

 An alternative daily emission limitation shall be

determined for the can coating operation, i.e.

for

all of the can coating lines at the source,

according to Section 218.205(c) (2) of this

PartSubpart.

 Actual daily emissions shall never

exceed

the

alternative

daily

emission

limitation

and shall be

calculated

use

the

following

equation:

n

=

2

V1

C1

 (1—F,

i=1

where:

Ed

=

Actual

VON

emissions

for

the

day

units of kg/day (lbs/day);

=

 Subscript

denoting

the

specific

coating applied;

n

=

Total

number

surface

coatings

applied in the can coating

operation;

63

=

Volume

each

coating

applied

for

the

day

units

1/day

(gal/day)

 of coating (minus water

and

any

compounds

which

are

specifically exempted from the

definition

VON);

=

The

VON

content

each

coating

applied

units

VON/i

(lbs

VON/gal) of coating (minus water

and any compounds which are

specifically exempted from the

definition

VON)

and

=

Fraction,

weight,

VON

emissions

from

the

surface

coating,

reduced or prevented from being

emitted

the

 ambient air. This is

the

overall

efficiency

the

capture

system

and

control

device.

2)

 The coating line is equipped with a capture system

and control device that provide 75 percent

reduction

the

overall

emissions

VON

from

the

coating line and the control device has a 90

percent efficiency.

LL

 No owner or operator of a plastic Parts coating line

which

applies

one

 more coatings during the same day,

all

which

are

subject

the

same

numerical

emission

limitation within Section 218.204(n) or

(o)

 of this

Subpart

 (e.g.,

 all coatings used on the line are

subject to 0.42 kci/l

 13.5 lbs/gal)), and which is

equipped

with

capture

system

and

control

device

shall

operate the subject coating line unless the

reciuireinents in subsection

 (b) (1) or

 (b) (2) of this

Section

 are met.

jJ

 No owner or operator of a

metal

furniture

coating

line

which

a~~lies one

 more coatings during the same day,

all

which

are

subject

the

same

numerical

emission

limitation

within

Section

218.204(g)

this

Subpart

(e.g.,

all

coatings

used

the

line

are

subject

0.34

 kci/i

2.8

 lbs/gal)), and which is equipped with a

capture

system

and

control

device

shall

operate

the

subject

coating

line

unless

the

reanirements

subsection

 (bI (1)

or

 (bI (2) of this Section are met.

~

No

owner

 or operator of a larae a~~liancecoating line

which

applies

one

coatings

during

the

same

day.

all

which

are

subject

the

same

numerical

 emission

limitation within Section 218.204(h) of this Subpart

(e.g..

all

coatings

used

the

line

are

subject

0.34 kg/l

 12,8

lbs/gal)),

and

which

ecrui~ped with

capture sYstem and control device shall operate the

subject coating line unless the requirements in

subsection

 (b) (1) or

 (b) (2)

 of this Section are met.

(Source:

 Amended at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

__________,

 effective

___________________________________________________________)

Section 218.208

 Exemptions From Emission Limitations

a)

 Exemptions for all coating categories except wood

furniture coating.

 The limitations of this Subpart

shall not apply to coating lines within a source, that

otherwise would be subject to the same subsection of

Section 218.204

 (because they belong to the same

coating category, e.g. can coating) provided that

combined actual emissions of VON from all lines at the

source subject to that subsection never exceed 6.8

kg/day

 (15 lbs/day) before the application of capture

systems and control devices.

 (For example, can coating

lines within a source would not be subject to the

limitations of Section 218.204(b) of this PartSubpart

if the combined actual emissions of VON from the can

coating lines never exceed 6.8 kg/day

 (15 lbs/day)

before the application of capture systems and control

devices.)

 Volatile organic material emissions from

heavy off-highway vehicle products coating lines must

be combined with VON emissions from miscellaneous metal

parts and products coating lines to determine

applicability.

 Any owner or operator of a coating

source shall comply with the applicable coating

analysis test methods and procedures specified in

Section 218.105(a)

 of this Part and the recordkeeping

and reporting requirements specified in Section

218.211(a) of this PartSubpart

 if total VON emissions

from the subject coating lines are always less than or

equal to 6.8 kg/day

 (15 lbs/day) before the application

of capture systems and control devices and, therefore,

are not subject to the limitations of Section 218.204

of this PartSub~art. Once a category of coating lines

at a source is subject to the limitations in Section

218•204T of this PartSubpart the coating lines are

always subject to the limitations in Section 218.204 of

this PartSubpart.

Applicability

for

 wood furniture coating

The

limitations

this

Subpart

shall

apply

source’s

wood

furniture

coating

lines

the

source

contains

process

emission

units,

not

regulated by Subparts B,

 E, F (excluding Section

218.204(1)

 of this PartSubpart), H (excluding

Section 218.405 of this Part),

Q,

R,

 5, T

65

(excluding Section 218.486 of this Part),

V,

X,

Y,

or BB of this Part, which as a group both:

Have

maximum

theoretical

emissions

(100

tons)

 more per calendar year of VON

if no air pollution control equipment were

used,

and

Are

not

limited

less

than

(100

tons)

of

VON

per

calendar

year

if

air

pollution

control equipment were used, through

production

capacity

limitations

contained

federally

enforceable

permit

SIP

revision.

~

 The limitations of this Subpart shall apply to a

source’s wood furniture coating lines,

 on and

after March 15,

 1996,

 if the source contains

process emission units, which as a group. have a

potential to emit 22.7 Mg

 (25 tons)

 or more of VON

per

calendar

year

and

have

not

limited

emissions

less

than

22.7

(25

tons)

VON

per

calendar

year through production or capacity limitations

contained in a federally enforceable operating

permit or

SIP

revision, and which:

~j..

Are

not regulated by Subparts B,

 E. F

(excluding Section 218.204(1)

 of this

Subpart).

 H. p

R,

 S, T (excluding Section

~8.486

 of this Part).

V.

X.

Y,

 Z or BB of

this Part: and

~j

 Are not included in any of the following

categories:

 synthetic organic chemical

manufacturing industry (SOCNI) distillation1

SOCMI reactors, plastic parts coating

(business

machines).

plastic

parts

coating

(other), offset lithography, industrial

wastewater. autobody refinishing. SOCMI batch

 processing, volatile organic licruid storage

tanks

and

clean—up

solvents

operations.

2~) If a source ceases to fulfill the criteria of

subsection~(b) (1) or

 (b) (2)

 of this Section, the

limitations of Section 218.204(1) of this

PartSub~artshall continue to apply to any wood

furniture coating line which was ever subject to

the limitations of Section 218.204(1) of this

PartSubpart.

3~) For the purposes of subsection

 (b) of this

Section, an emission unit shall be considered ~

~

 regulated by a Subpart if it is subject to the

limitations

that

Subpart.

emission

unit

not considered reaulated by a Subpart

if

it

 is not

subject to the limits of that Subpart,

 e.g.

the

emission unit is covered

 by an exemption

 in the

Subpart or the applicability criteria

 of the

Subpart are not met.

45)

Any

 owner or operator of a wood furniture coating

line

which

the

limitations

this

Subpart

are

not applicable due

the

criteria

in

subsection

(b)

this

Section

shall,

upon

request

the

Agency or the USEPA,

 submit records

 to the Agency

and the USEPA within 30 calendar days from the

date

the

request

that

document

that

the

coating

line

exempt

from

the

limitations

this

Subpart.

~nana

fter~rcr~~icS5

 the 1:~ta~ons

tnas

~ub~tshafl.

 not atpJ~to touch-up and repai.~ppatings.

çfi ..hy.~’ç~a~

sced~scm

bed

by

subsect~~,o~s

IP

20~~j

 li~_~f1 ~

(i)

 i-fl

 Cn~and

(ol

of

t~i~U~part;

 provided that the source-~idthvól~e

of

ueh.~coatanqE~sVc_acesnot ~ceeo

 0 95

 1. U

 ~art~

PeY

ci~g~t—hour

period

 exceed

209

1~~55~~ l/y~f.or

~

 m~onthDeraod

 ~ecordkeeping

and

r~POL_frt_crLrj~~2±pd

r~p~ir

coata~g~1j~j,~1

be

.~c~si~t~rnt

 ~~ithSe’t~o~

 218 211(bl(4)

of

 th.1S Subpar-t

,~......

.-...~

-~..~---

::~_-,~

....

--..~......,.

.......

..-.‘~..

coat~flQ

.1fl~

cr~

 group

ccatinq

lines

u~i~nq~~toucb’-uc

ct

Setao1~

 2i.~.:204.~b):,~

(d

ti)

proV.isiofls o~Sectjion-

2aS.2Q8(.c~

cf.this.si~b~r±~:shall~

Ii.

 1~t ~nd r~c~d~ti-ie

‘—‘.‘

..-....‘..-.~...

~‘~34

re~ai~.coatj~c,as.

~

per

eight-hour.

i~d~i-3d~D~

ii~dnth

•.•~...

.....

......

P-c?rforlr

calc~ñatior~s

 daily

basis,

and

ca~Icu1atjcn~

 of ~

comban~5

~Ld

and.:rep-eir.

co~tind~

 used s

 rcë

iid.~~~6~ie

j~

 Perform caLlcu:ations

on a

~c~thly

basis,

and

.~..

..~-

..~.

~..J

.,..

1...

~

~“

~-oat’n-~-

“sec~~o’~-’-’e--~’-d-’

~rr~

~

 ~—

~i1~”r’.c~

67

this

Sect~o’—on or ~fcre

J~anUErV

 31 of

the

~

 Na~ntain

the

 s~mrce

for ~ mimu~

period of

~

 ~Pt~D~X

~

 sUb~ectio~and ~aa3~.e

 such

records

~vail-abl~

S.::.:.

~

~

exceeds

209

1/yr

(55

 gal/yr) for ~ny

 roflhn-q

~

~

~

LL

~

~

~

~

py~r~

u~cr~p~

~

(Source:

Amended

_____

Ill.

Req.

,

effective

Section

218.210

Compliance

Schedule

Every owner or operator of a coating

 line

 (of a type included

within Section 218.204 ~,,,this

shall

comply

with

the

requirements

Section

218.204,

218.205,

218.207

218.208

and

Section

218.211

 Sections 218.212 and 218.213 of

this ~J1~2J2~1It

~ifl

accordance

with

the

appropriate

compliance.

hedule

specified

subsection

(a)

,

(b)

,

(c)~or

(d)

(e)

~J~fj~

below:

owner

operator

coating

line

which

exempt

from

the

limitations

Section

218.204

this

~a~-~Subpart

because

the

criteria

Section

218.208(a)

this

p-a~-tSuboart

shall

operate

said

coating

line

after

date

consistent

with

Section

218.106

this

Part,

unless

the

owner

operator

has

complied

with,

and

continues

comply

with,

Section

218.211(b)

this

Portsubnart.

Wood

furniture

coating

lines

are

not

subject

Section

218.211(b)

 of this

p&~-~Subpart.

b)

No

owner

operator

coating

line

complying

means of Section 218.204

 of this P-or-tSuboart shall

operate

said

coating

line

after

date

consistent

with

Section

218.106

this

Part,

unless

 the owner or

operator

has

complied

with,

and,

continues

comply

with,

Sections

218.204

and

218.211(c)

this

pa~Suboart,

68

owner

 or operator of a coating line complying by

means

Section

218.205

this

PartSubpart

shall

operate said coating line on or after a date consistent

with

Section

218.106

this

Part,

unless

the

owner

operator has complied with, and continues to comply

with,

 Sections 218.205 and 218.211(d) of this

rartsubpart.

owner

 or operator of a coating line complying by

means of Section 218.207 of this PartSub~artshall

operate

said

coating

line

after

date

consistent

with

Section

218.106

this

Part,

unless

the

owner

operator

has

complied

with,

and

continues

comply

with,

Sections

218.207

and

218.211(e)

this

Part Subpart.

owner

onerator

coating

line

subiect

one

the

emission

limitations

contained

Section 218.204 of this Subpart on or after March 15,

1996,

choosing

comply

means

Section

218.204,

218.205 or 218.207 of this Subpart, shall operate said

coating line on or after March 15,

 1996. unless the

owner

 or operator complies with and continues to comely

with,

respectively,

the

applicable

requirements

Section

218.204,

the

alternative

control

options

Sections

218.205

218.207

and

the

reguirements

Section 218.211.

~J

 No owner or operator of a coating line sublect to one

or more of the emission limitations contained in

Section 218.204 of this Subpart on or after March 15.

1996, choosing to comply by means of Section 218.212 of

this Subpart, shall operate said coating line on or

after March

15,

 1996. unless the owner or operator

complies with and continues to comply with the

requirements of Sections 218.212 and 218.213 of this

Subpart.

(Source:

Amended

_____

Ill.

Reg.

,

effective

____________________________________________________________)

Section 218.212

 Cross-Line Averaaing to Establish Compliance

for

Coating

Lines

~j

 On and after March 15.

 1996. anY owner or operator of a

coating

line

subject

 the limitations set forth in

Section 218.204 of this Subpart, and with coating lines

in operation prior to January 1. 1991 (“~re—existina

coating lines”), may. for pre—existing coating lines

only,

elect

co~piy with

the

reauirements

this

Section. rather than complying with the anplicable

emission limitations set forth in Section 218.204,

if

an o~erationa1change of the tv~edescribed below has

been made after January

1.

 1991.

 to one or more pre—

existinc coatinc lines

 at the source.

 An operational

h~flge0ccurs when

 a Dre-existing coatinq1in~

 j.~,

~plaç~d_

 with

a

 using lower VON coating’ for the

same

ourpose

the

replaced

line

(“replacement

line”)

A

~

 ~~1~cting

to

rely

his

Sec

nto

deqflstrate compliance with the requirement

 of t~i5

S~p~rt:

shall

Qperate

oursuant

federally

enforceable

peconditionsappr

 ovbv

~e

An owner

 or operator of pre—existinc coating

 lines

~,~Jectto

 a VON content limitation

 in Section

 218.204

of ~

 Su)~p.artand electing ,,to ~

on

~

S

demonstrate conioljance with this Subpart must

establish,

use

the

ecuations

subsection

(d)

of

this

Scction~

that

the

calculated

,~QM

ei5~S1o

flS

from

~11

partici,pa

~ipg

oatin

def J.ped

below,

are

lss

than

the

calculat

allowable

VON

emissions

from

the

same

group

coating

lines

For

aoypj~-existing

coating

~in

eto

q~qated

purposes

218

218.

3,,

218.214

 hi.s

Subpart

 (“p.ai,t

icip~,pq

coa~pg

1±ne~”)

th e

source

must

establish

hat:

All

coatings

anolied

the

participating

coating

i~ne

shall,

all

times,

have

VON

content

 less

than

 ec-ual to the applicable VON

content

i~1natation

for

such

coating

listed

Appendix

Part~

and

the

date

the

source

elects

rely

this

Section

demonstrate

com~ljance

with

this

.~bpart,

all

coatinos

applied

the

participating

coating line are not already in

compliance with

the

VON

content

limitation

for

such

coating

effective on or after

March

15,

1996;

the

participating coatina line is

a

replacement

 line,

defined

subsection

(a)

this

Section

with

an operational change occurring on or after

~ary

.1 ~9l~

~

 tw~.thstanaangsubsect~~fa~ of this

 S~ct,ion.,

any

owner

operator.a.f.:.~..

c~attnq...l1~d:.:.1?~’t’~

1~tataons

 set forth

~n Se~q~on218.204 Qf tha~

.~-.

~

—

.~J,.J

:~ •_,.

~,-

,4J

$.S ‘.A.S

~‘.J

JflI,.1.’Y~•~-

,J_

~lude

 as ~ ~artic~~ting

 x~t1pq lane, until

~-eceinber

1.~99

 cn.v

 an~r

repLacement

.aie

that

satIs~ies

a1~

of o~efollowing

conditions~

~I

t~~ati~q

ct~atinc~

1n~eone o~~

hues

 t~u~

satisfy

the

criteri~

rep1ace~ent

~

~

~J,,

TodemonstratecomplianwithtsSect~on,

shah

 estabii

 the following:

An

alternative

daily

emission

limitation

shall

~~IP~PQ~U,

fg~,,all

participating

coating

lines

source

 according

sction

~.)

ection

~

~d

)

d~y ~c

de~nons

£q,~sestabI1Eh~d~p3ar

esdahly

~.t-~a~i---l---

:~:~

 ‘J~

ñi~ion

from

~~~rtac

lPa t3.flg

~,flg_~1ne~s

(E~

hl

never

e~ceedthe

 al,ternativedoily emission limi~at~p~

L~)~,anL~1

calculated

ist

foilg~iflg~quat

o

n

Ed

il

where:

Actual

daily

VON

emissions

from

participatin~

coating

lines

units

kg/day

(lbs/day)

Subscrjp~

 denoting

a

 specific coating

ap~1i~dj

n—

 Total num.be

i-p

 fcoatinQs applied

by aU

participati rig

coating

 lines

at

the

~qprce;

Volume

each

coatinc

 applied for the day in

1~,nitsof

1/day

jday)

coating

jminus

~iater

 ~and any

compounds

which

~pecifical?y

 exempted

 from the definition

of

VON);

and

The

VON

content

each

coating

 as applied in

un.ts

VON/i

ksJ,g~,~

Q~J~in~

(rDifl

Water

and

ayy

çmpp~fl.~S

i~.çh

Sp,~çallyexe~

oorn

tie

definition

2)

~e

~

 ~tive~dai1y

 emission limitation LA~

shall

.k~

determined

for

all

 art~ç,~Dating

coat

lines at the Source on

 d-ilv ba~is as

 fr~11tmic.

.....~,

 c....,

-........

....,~,,,

~

___

where A1 and ~are

 defined in subsections

 (2) (A)

and

 (2) (B)

 of this Section.

~

 The portion of the alternative daily

emissions limitation for coating oDerations

at a source using non—powder coating (A~

shall be determined for all such

participating non—powder coating lines on a

daily basis as follows:

n

A1

E

V~L~fD~-C~

i=1

(D1

—

L1)

where:

The

VON

emissions

allowed

for

the

day

units of k~/dav (lbs/day);

i—

Subscript

denoting

specific

coating

applied~

Total

number

coatings

a~~1iedin

the

participating coating lines:

~

 The VON content of each coating as

applied in units of kg VON/i

 (lbs

VON/gal) of coating (minus water

and

any

compounds which are s~ecifica1ly

exemPted from the definition of VOM)~

The

density

VON

each

coating

applied.

For

the

purposes

calculating A1. the density is 0.882 kg

VON/l

VON

(7.36

lbs

VON/aai

VON)

Volume

each

coating

applied

for

the

day

units

(gal)

coating

Iminus water and anY compounds which are

specifically exempted from the

definition

VON);

and

The

 VON emission limitation for each

coating applied.

 as specified in Section

218.204

 of this Subpart,

 in units of kg

VON/i

(lbs

VON/gall

 of coating

 (minus

water and anY compounds which are

specifically

exempted

from

the

definition of VON).

~j

The

portion

the

alternative

daily

emission

limitation

for

coating

operations

source

usina

powdered

coating

(As)

shall

determined for all such participatin~Powder

coating lines at the source on a daily basis

follows:

E

E

 V~ L~ D~ K~

h=1 j=1

(D~

—

L3)

where:

The

VON

emissions

allowed

for

the

day

units

kg/day

(lbs/day):

h=

 Subscript denoting a specific powder

coating lineL

j~

 Subscript denoting a specific powder

coating applied

in=

 Total number of participating powder

coating linest

n=

 Total number of powder coatings applied

the

participating

coating

lines;

The

assumed

 density of VOM in liquid

coating, 0.882 kg

VON/i VON

 (7.36

lbs

VOM/~al

VON);

Volume

each

powder

coating

consumed

for the day in units of

1

 (gal) of

coating; and

The

VON

 emission limitation for each

coating applied. as specified in Section

218.204

 of this Subpart,

 in units of kg

VON/i

 (lbs VON/gal) of coating

 (minus

water and any compounds which are

specifically exempted from the

definition

VON);

and

K=

 A constant for each individual coating

line_representing the ratio of the

volume of coating solids consumed on the

liauid coating system which has been

replaced to the volume of powder coating

consumed

 the replacement line to

accomplish

the

same

coating

lob.

This

value shall be determined by the source

based on tests conducted and records

73

maintained pursuant to the requirements

of Section 218.213 of this Subpart

demonstrating the amount of coating

solids consumed as both liauid and

powder.

Test

methods

and

recordkeepin~

reauirements shall be approved by the

Agency and USEPA and shall be contained

in the source’s operating permit as

federally enforceable permit conditions,

sublect to the following restrictions:

j)..

 K cannot exceed 0.9 for non—

recycled powder

coating

systems;

jjj.

 K cannot exceed 2.0 for recycled

powder coating systems.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

 effective

____

Section

218.213

Recordkeeping

and

Reporting

for

Cross—Line

Averaging

Participating

Coating

Lines

AnY

owner

operator

coating

line

that

elects

com~lv

means of Section 218.212 of this Subpart

shall

establish

the

following:

~J..

By

the date consistent with Section 218.210(f) of this

Subpart,

 or upon initial start-up of a new coating line

replacing a pre-existing coating line,

 as defined in

Section 218.212 of this Subpart. or upon changing the

method of compliance for a pre-existinci coating line

from

the

reQuirements

 of Section 218.204 or Section

218.207

this

Subpart

the

requirements

 Section

218.~212 of

this

Subpart,

the

owner

operator

the

source shall certify to the Agency that each

participating coating line,

 as determined in accordance

 with_Section 218.212 of this Subpart, will be in

compliance with Section 218.212 of this Subpart on and

after a date consistent with Section 218.210(f) of this

Subpart, or on and after the initial start-up date of

such

participating

coating

lines.

Such

certification

shall

also

include:

fl

The

name

and

identification

number

each

participating coating line

~j.

 The name and identification number of each coating

as applied on each participating coating line

fl

The

weight

VOM

per

volume

each

coating

and

the volume of each coating (minus water and any

comPounds which are specifically exempted form the

definition of VON)

 as applied each day on each

participating

coating

line

j)-

 The instrument or

method

which

the

owner

operator will accurately measure or calculate the

volume of each coating as applied each day on each

participating coating line

~j.

The

method

which

the

owner

 or operator will

create

and

maintain

records

each

day

required

in subsection

(b)

 of this Section

~j.

example

the

format

which

the

records

required

subsection

(b)

 this Section will be

kept

ih

A

statement

that

all

coatings

used

participating coating lines have a VON content

less

than

equal

the

applicable

VOM

limitation

for

such

coating

set

forth

within

Appendix H of this Part,

 and that all lines

either:

~j

 Underwent a change in operations

incorporating a lower VON coating on each

applicable participating coating line after

the

date

 of January 1.

 1991:

or

Are

not

 in compliance and continued

compliance with the coating limitations in

Section 218.204 of this Subpart, compliance

with which is required on or after March

15,

1996.

~j.

The

method

by

which the owner or operator has

calculated K. for the equation contained in

Section 218 212~4(~~B~of this Subpart

if

applicable.

~

 On and after a date consistent with Section 218.210(f)

this

Subpart,

and

after

the

initial

start-up

date,_the

owner

operator

source

electing

comply with the requirements of this Subpart by means

of Section 218.212 of this Subpart shall collect and

record the following information on a daily basis for

each participating coating line and maintain the

information

the

source

for

period

three

years:

The

name

and

identification

number

each

coating

as applied on each participating coating line

~j.

The

weight

VOM

per

volume

and

the

volume

each coating (minus water and any compounds which

are

specifically

exempted

from

the

definition

VON) as applied on each participating coating line

on a daily basis; and

 The daily weighted

average

VOM

content

all

coatings as applied on each coating line as

defined at 35

Ill.

 Adm.

Code 211.1230.

~

 On and after a date consistent with Section 218.210(f)

of this Subpart. the

owner

or operator of participating

coating lines shall:

~j

Notify

 the Agency within 30 days following an

occurrence of a violation of Section 218.212 of

this

Subpart;

and

Send

the

Agency

anY

record

showing

violation

Section

218.212

this

Subpart

within

days

following

the

occurrence

 violation.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

effective

____

___________________________________________________________)

Section

 218.214

 Changing Compliance Methods

~j

At

least

30

calendar

days

before

changing

the

method

compliance with this Subpart from Section

218.212

of

this

Subpart

Section

218.204

Section

218.207

this

Subpart.

 the owner or operator of a source relyin~

on Section 218.212 to demonstrate compliance with this

Subpart

for

one

pre—existing

coating

lines

shall comely with all requirements of Section 218.211

(c) (1) or

 (e) (1) of this Subpart. respectively.

Upon

changing

the

method

 of compliance with this

Subpart

from

Section

 218.212 to Section

218.204

or

Section

218.207

 of this Subpart, the

owner

or operator

of a source shall comely with the reauirements of

Section 218.211(c)

or

(e)

 of this Subpart,

respectively.

The

owner

operator

shall

certify

that

all

 remaining

participatina coating lines,

 if any, comply and

continue to comply with the requirements of Section

218.212 of this Subpart.

(Source:

Added

Ill.

Reg.

,

effective

)

SUBPART

LEAI(C

 FROM SYNTHETIC

 ORGANIC

CHEMICAL AND

POLYMER

MANUFACTURING

PLANT

Section

218.431

A~plicabjlity

proviion~ of Sec~.j,.cns2i~A31 thro~iqh

2l~43~

t’h~s p~parts?~aU

~~1y

~

 Every owner or operator of any chemical

‘

manufacturing

process

unit

that

manufactures,

primary

nroduct,

one

the

chemicals

listed

Appendix

this

Part

and

 that

chemical

manufacturina

process

unit

causes

allows

any reactor

or distillation unit,

 either

individually or

 in tandem,

 to discharge one Or

process

vent

streams

either

directly

to-

the

 atmosohere

 or to

 a recovery system~ ~

~

All

continuous

distillation

and

r-e~ctor

process

emission

uflits

not

subj.~,pt

 to ~ect~.on

2l~52O

through

218

527

this

Part,

a~d

~a~~t~In

Stepa~

 ~ompany’~

 Milisdale manu.facti,~ru~f~cul1ty~

~J

 Notwithstanding

 subsection

(a)

 of this

Section,

the

control requirements set forth within Section

 218.432

of

 this Subpart shall not amply to the

following:

Any

process

vent

stream

with

total

resource

effectiveness

 (TRE)

 index value greater than

1.0.

However,

 such process vent stream remains subject

to the performance testing requirements contained

in Section 218.433 of this Subpart and the

reporting

and recordJceeping requirements contained

in Section 218.435 of this Subpart

~j,

 Any reactor or distillation

 unit that

is

designed

and operated

 as a batch operation

~

 Any reactor or distillation unit that

 is part

of

a

polymer manufacturing operation

~j

 Any reactor or distillation unit that is part of

the chemical manufacturing process unit witb~

total design capacity of less than

 1 gigagraIn

(1,100

 tons)

 per year for all chemicals produced..

as a primary product. within that process unit.

However,

 such operations remain subject to the

reporting and recordkeeping requirements contained

in Section 218.435(d)

 of this Subpart; or

~)

Any

 vent stream with

 a flow rate less than 0.0085

scm/mm

or

 a total VON concentration of less than

500 oomv~ less methane

and

ethane, as measured

Method

18,

or

 a concentration of VON of less than

250 ppmv as measured by Method 25A.

 However, such

çperations remain subject to the terformance

testing reauirement listed in Section 218.433 of

this Subpart.

 as well as the reporting and

recordkeeping

requirements

contained

Section

218.435 of this Subpart.

~Qj

Any

 reactor or distillation unit included within

an Early Reduction Program. as

specified

CFR

63,

and

published

Fed.

Req.

61970

(October

22,

1993),

evidenced

timely

enforceable

commitment

approved

USEPA.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

effective

____

)

e~-t&on

218.432

Control

Requirements

~J

Every

owner

operator

 a source sublect to the

requirements

 this Subpart, as determined by Section

218.431

this

Subpart,

shall

either:

fl

 Reduce emissions of

VON,

less

methane

ethane,

weight-percent,

ppmv.

dry

basis,

corrected

percent

oxygen.

whichever

less stringent

~j

 If a boiler or process heater is used to comply

with this Subpart. the vent stream shall be

introduced

into

the

flame

zone

the

boiler

process heater; or

.~j

 If a flare is used to comply with this Subpart it

shall comply with the requirements of 40 CFR

60.18.

 incorporated by reference at Section

218.112

this

Part.

The

flare

operation

requirements

CFR

60.18

not

a~~lyif

process.

not

subiect

this

Subpart,

vents

emergency relief discharge into a common flare

header and causes the flare servicina the process

subject to this Subpart to not comply with one or

more of the provisions of 40 CFR 60.18.

~j

 Notwithstanding subsection

 (a) or

 (c) of this Section,

and

subject

subsection

(b) (2)

this

Section:

jj.

owner

operator

 a source sublect to

Section 218.432 of this Subpart shall cause or

allow VON to be emitted throuah an existing

control device unless the control device is

operated to achieve:

~j

 90 percent control of the VON emissions

vented to it; or

~j

 VON emissions concentration of less than 50

ppmv, on a dry basis.

~j

Any

existing control device sublect to subsection

(a) of this Section is reauired to meet the 98

percent emissions

limit

set

forth

subsection

(a) (1) upon the earlier to occur of the date the

control

device

replaced

for

any

reason.

including,

but

not

limited

to,

normal

 maintenance,

malfunction,

accident,

 and obsolescence,

or

December 31,

 1999.

 A control device is considered

replaced

when:

All

the

device

 replaced: or

flj..

 When

the

cost

repair

the

device

the

cost

replace

cart

the

device

exceeds

percent of the cost of

replacing

the

entire

device with a device that complies with the

98

 emissions 1imitat~Lonin subsection

 (a) (1)

this

Section.

.~j

 For each individual vent stream within a chemical

 manufacturing process unit with a TRE index value

greater than 1.0. the owner or oøerator shall maintain

process vent stream parameters that retain a calculated

TRE

index

value

greater

than

1.0

means- of

recovery.

Any

recovery

device

shall

have

its

primary

purpose

the

caoture

chemicals

for

use,

reuse.

sale.

The

TRE

index

value

shall

calculated

the

 outlet of

the

final

recovery

device.

(Source:

Added

—

 Ill.

Reg.

________,

 effective

Section

218.433

Performance

and

Testing

Requirements

For

the

purpose

demonstrating

compliance

with

the

TRE

index

value

Section

218.432(c)

this

Subpart,

engineerin~

assessment

shall

made

determine

process

vent

stream

flow

rate.

net

heating

value,

and

VON

emission

rate

for

the

 representative operating

conditions

expected

yield

the

lowest

TRE

index

value.

 The source shall also calculate the TRE index

values pursuant to the equations contained within

Appendix

(b)

(1)

this

Part.

il

If

the TRE index value calculated using such

engineering

assessment

and

the

TRE

equation

Appendix G

 (b) (1)

 of this Part is greater than

4.0,

then

the

owner

operator

exempt

from

performing

the

measurements

specified

Appendix

(a)

 of this Part.

~j..

the

TRE

index

value

calculated

using

 such

engineering assessment and the TRE eauation in

Appendix G

 (b) (1)

 of this Part is less than or

79

eaual to 4.0. then the owner or operator shall

perform the measurements specified in Appendix

 G(a)

 of this Part.

An

owner

or operator of

a

source

may.

the

alternative,

elect

comply

with

the

control

requirements

specified

Section

218.432 of this Subpart rather than performing the

measurements

Appendix

G(a)

this

Part.

~j.

 An engineering assessment shall include, but is

not

limited

to,

the

fo1lowing~

test

results,

provided

the

tests

are

representative of current operating practices

at the chemical manufacturing process unit

Bench—scale

pilot—scale

test

data

the

process under representative operating

conditions

~j

 Maximum flow rate,

 as stated within a permit

limit, applicable to the process vent

~

 Design analysis based on accepted chemical

engineering principles, measurable process

parameters, or physical or chemical laws or

Properties.

Examples

analytical

methods

include,

but

are

 not limited to, the

following:

jj.

 Use of material balances based on

process stoichiometry to estimate

maximum VON concentrations

jj)

 Estimation of maximum flow rate based on

physical equipment design such as pump

or blower capacities;

iii) Estimation of VON concentrations based

on saturation conditions; and

i~I

Estimation

maximum

expected

net

heating

value

based

the

stream

concentration of each organic compound.

or. alternatively, as if all VON in the

stream

were

the

compound

with

the

highest heating value.

~J..

 All data.

 assumptions, and procedures used in

the engineering assessment shall be

documented.

For

the

purpose

 of demonstrating com~ljancewith the

control reauirements in Section 218.432 of this

Subpart. the chemical manufacturing process unit shall

80

run

representative

operating

conditions

and

flow

rates during any Performance test.

gj..

The

following

methods

CFR

60,

incorporated

reference at Section 218.13.2 of this Part,

 shall be

used

demonstrate

compliance

with

the

reduction

efficiency requirement listed in Section 218.432(a) (1)

of this Subpart.

fl

 Method

 3. or 1A, incorporated by reference at

Section 218.112 of this Part.

 as appropriate, for

selection

 of the sampling sites.

 The control

device inlet sampling site for determination of

vent stream molar composition or VOM content,

 less

methane and ethane. reduction efficiency shall be

located

after

the

last

recovery

device

but

prior

to the inlet of the control device, prior to any

dilution of the process vent stream, and prior to

release

the

atmosphere.

21

 Method

2.

2A,

2C,

or

2D,

incorporated

reference

at Section 218.112 of this Part,

 as a~pro~riate.

for determination of ~as stream volumetric flow

rate.

.~j..

The

emission

rate

correction

Iactor,

integrated

sampling,

and

analysis

procedure

Method

incorporated bY reference at Section 218.112 of

 this Part.

 shall be used to determine the oxygen

concentration

 (O2d)

 for the purpose of determining

compliance with the 20 ppmv limitation.

The

sampling site for determining compliance with the

20 ppmv limitation shall be the same site used for

the VON samples. and samples shall be taken at the

same time that

the

VON

samples

are

taken.

The

VON

concentration

corrected

percent

oxygen

(C~j

shall

computed

using

the

following

formula:

~VOM~

 17.9

20.9 —

where:

 Concentration of VON

 (minus methane

and

ethane)

corrected

Percent

Q2.

dry basis. ppmv.

 Concentration of VON

 (minus methane

and ethanej. dry basis. ~Pmv

~.Q2d

 Concentration of oxygen. dry basis,

percent

volume.

81

jl.

 Method 18.

 incorporated by reference at Section

218.112

of this Part, to determine the

concentration of VON. less methane and ethane. at

 the outlet of the control device when determining

compliance with the 20 ~~mv limitation in Section

218.432

(a)

(1)

this

Subpart.

both

the

control device inlet and outlet

when

the

reduction

efficiency of the control device is to be

determined.

~j

The

minimum

sampling time for each run shall

hour

which

either

integrated

sample

four

grab

samples

shall

taken.

If grab sampling

 used then the samples

shall be taken at 15-minute intervals.

The

emission

reduction

(R)

VON,

less

methane

and

ethane,

shall

determined

using

the following formula:

j.~-_E~

____________

100

where:

Emission reduction. percent by

weight.

Mass rate of VON (minus methane and

ethane) entering the control

device. kg VON/hr.

Mass

rate

VON,

less

methane

and

 ethane discharged to the

atmosphere.

 kg VON/hr.

Qj

The

mass

rates

VON

(E1.

shall

computed using the following formula:

n

K~J~

C1~~)Q~

n

~

 (E C~)

Q~,

where:

C~,

 Concentration of sample

component “1” of the

gas

stream

the

inlet

and

outlet

the

control

device.

res~ectivelv.dry basis. p~mv.

___

 Molecular weight of sample

component “j” of the gas

stream

the

inlet

and

outlet

of the control device.

respectively, grams

per

gram—mole.

Q1. O~

 Flow rate

gas

stream

the

inlet and outlet of the

control device, respectively.

dry

scm/mint.

2.494

x

10~

(liters

~er

minute) (aram—mole ~er

scm) (kg/g)

 (min/hr).

where

standard temperature for

(gram-mole per scm)

 is 20°C.

The

representative

VON

concentration (C~0~

the

sum

each

the

individual

components of

VON

 (Cj)

and shall be computed

for each run using the following:

n

cVOM

E ~

where:

~VOM

 Concentration of VON

 (minus methane

and ethane), dry basis. ~pmv.

 Concentration of sample component

“1”, dry basis. ~pmv.

n

 Number of components in the sample.

~j

When

 boiler or process heater with a design heat

input capacity of

 44 megawatts or greater, or a

boiler or process heater into which the Process

vent

stream

introduced

with

the

primary

fuel.

used

comply

with

the

control

requirements,

an initial performance test is not reauired.

~

 When a flare is used to comply with the control

requirements

this

rule.

 the flare shall com~lvwith

the

requirements

 40 CFR 60.18.

incorporated bY

reference at Section 218.112 of this Part.

83

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

effective

____

___________________________________________________________)

Section 218.434

 Monitoring Requirements

~J

The

owner

operator

source

subject

the

control

requirements

Section

218.432

this

Subpart

that

uses

incinerator

comPly

with

the

VON

emission

limitation

specified

Section

218.432

(a)

(1)

shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate,

according to manufacturer’s specifications.

a

temperature

monitoring

device

equipped

with

continuous recorder and having an accuracy of ±1

percent of the temperature measured expressed in

degrees Celsius. or

±0.5°C.whichever

greater.

Where

incinerator

other

than

catalytic

incinerator

used,

temperature

monitoring

device

shall

installed

the

firebox.

21

Where

cata1y~tic

incinerator

used,

temperature

monitoring

devices

shall

installed

the

~as

stream

immediately

before

and

after

the

catalyst

bed.

The

owner

operator

 a source that uses a flare to

comply

with

Section

 218.432

(a) (2)

this

SubPart

shall

install, calibrate. maintain, and operate, according to

manufacturer’s specifications.

 a heat—sensing device.

such as an ultraviolet beam sensor or thermocouple. at

the

pilot

light

indicate

continuous

presence

flame.

The

owner

operator

source

that

uses

boiler

process

heater

with

 a design heat input capacity less

than

megawatts

comply

 with Section 218

•

432 (a)

(1)

of this Subpart shall install, calibrate, maintain, and

operate,

according

the

manufacturer’s

specifications,

temperature

 monitoring device in the

firebox.

 The monitoring device shall be equipped with

a continuous recorder with an accuracy of ±1percent of

the temperature being measured expressed in degrees

Celsius

±0.5°C,

whichever is greater.

 AnY boiler or

process heater in which all vent streams are introduced

with primary fuel is

exemPt

from

this

requirement.

~j.. The owner or operator of a process vent with a TRE

index value of 4.0 or less that

uses

one

product recovery devices shall install either an

organic monitoring device equipped with a continuous

recorder or the monitoring equipment specified in

subsections

 (d) (1).

 (d) (2).

 (d) (3).

or

 (d) (4) of this

Section, depending on the type of recoverY device used.

All

monitoring equipment shall be installed,

calibrated,

and

maintained

according

the

manufacturer’s specifications.

jj..

 Where an absorber is the final recovery device in

the

recovery system. a scrubbing

liquid

temPerature monitoring device and a specific

aravitv monitoring device, each equipped with a

continuous recorder. shall be used.

21

 Where a

condenser is the final recovery device in

the recovery system. a condenser exit

 (product

side) temPerature monitoring device equipped with

a continuous recorder and having an accuracy of ±1

percent of the temperature being monitored

expressed in de~reesCelsius or ±0.5°C.whichever

is greater.

~j

 Where a carbon

the

final

 recovery

device in the

recóvéry

 system. an integrating

regeneration

stream

 flow monitoring device having

an accuracy of ±10percent. capable of recording

the total regeneration stream mass flow for each

regeneration

cycle;

and

carbon

bed

temperature

monitoring device having an accuracy of ±1Percent

the

temperature

being

monitored

expressed

degrees Celsius of ±0.5°C.capable of recording

the

carbon

bed

temperature

after

each

regeneration

and within 15 minutes of completing any cooling

cycle.

il

 Where a

scrubber

used

with

incinerator,

boiler,

or.

the

case

haloaenated

vent

streams.

 a Process heater. the following

monitoring eguipment is required for the scrubber:

~j.

 A pH monitoring device eauipped with a

continuous recorder to

monitor

the

pH

the

scrubber effluent; and

~I

 Flow meters equipped with

 a continuous

recorder

the

 scrubber influent for liquid

flow

and

the

scrubber

inlet

for

gp~

stream

flow.

The

owner

operator

process

vent

using

vent

system

that

contains

bypass

lines

capable

diverting

vent

stream

away

from

the

 control device associated

with

process

vent

shall

com~lv with

either

(e)

(1)

(e) (2) of this Section. E~ipmentneeded for safety

purPoses.

 including, but not limited to. pressure

relief devices, are not subject to this subsection.

jL.1

The

owner

 or operator shall install, calibrate.

maintain, and operate a flow indicator that

provides a record of vent stream flow at least

once

everY

minutes0

The

flow

indicator

shall

installed

the

entrance

any

bypass

line

that

could

divert

the

vent

stream

away

from

the

control

device

the

atmosphere.

21

 The owner or operator shall secure the bypass line

valve in the closed position with a car—seal or a

lock-and-key tv~econfiguration.

 A visual

inspection of the seal or closure mechanism shall

be performed at least once everY month to ensure

that

the

valve

maintained

the

 closed

position

and

the

vent

stream

not

 diverted

through

the

bv~ass

line.

The

owner

operator

 a Process vent may monitor by

an_equivalent alternative means or Parameters other

than those listed in subsections

 (a) through

(d)

of

this Section.

 Any equivalent alternative shall be

aPProved bY the Aaencv and USEPA, and contained in the

source’s operating permit as federally enforceable

permit conditions.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

effective

____

______________________________________________________)

Section 218.435

 Record1ceepin~and Reporting Requirements

~j.

 EverY owner or operator of a reactor or

distillation

unit with a TRE index value of

4.0

or less shall keep

records,

for

minimum

years.

the

following

parameters

measured

during

performance

test

TRE

determination

required

under

Section

218.433

this

Subpart. and required to be monitored under Section

218.434 of this Subpart.

Every owner or operator of a source that seeks to

demonstrate compliance with Section 218.432(a) (1)

this

Subpart

throu~’h the

use

 of either a

thermal

catalytic

incinerator

shall

maintain

records of the followi~g.j.

~j

 The average firebox temPerature of the

incinerator

 (or the average temperature

upstream and downstream of the catalyst bed

for a catalytic incinerator), measured at

least every 15 minutes and averaged over the

same time period of the performance testing

and

~

 The Percent reduction of VON determined as

specified in Section 218.433(c)

 of this

Subpart achieved bY the incinerator, or the

concentration of

VON

(ppmv, by compound)

86

determined as specified in Section 23.8.433(c)

this

Subpart

the

outlet

the

control

device,

dry

basis,

corrected

Percent

oxy~en.

 Every owner or operator of a source that seeks to

demonstrate compliance with Section 218.432 (a) (1)

of this Subpart through the use of a boiler or

process heater shall maintain the records

described below.

 AnY boiler or process heater in

which all vent streams are introduced with primary

fuel

are

exempt

from

these

requirements.

description

the

 location at which the

vent

stream

introduced

into

the

boiler

process heater; and

~l

The

average

combustion

temperature

the

boiler or process heater with a design heat

input capacity of less than 44 megawatt

measured at least every 15 minutes and

averaged over the same time period of the

performance testing.

fl

 Every owner or operator

source

that

seeks

demonstrate compliance with Section 218.432(a) (21

this

Subpart

through

use

smokeless

flare.

or flare design

 (i.e..

 steam—assisted.

air—assisted. or nonassisted). shall maintain

records of all visible emission readings, heat

content determinations, flow rate measurements.

and exit velocity determinations made during the

performance test, continuous records of the flare

pilot flame monitoring, and records of all periods

of operations during

which

the

pilot

flame

absent.

4j

 Every owner or operator of a source that seeks to

demonstrate compliance with Section 218.432(b)

of

this Subpart shall maintain records of the

following:

~j

 Where an absorber is

the final recovery

device

the

recovery

system,

the

exit

specific gravity

 (or alternative Parameter

which is a measure of the degree of absorbing

liquid

saturation,

 if a~~rovedby the Agency

and USEPA. and average exit temPerature of

the

absorbing

 liquid

measured at least every

15 minutes and averaged over the same time

period as the Performance testing

 (both

measured while the vent stream is normally

routed and constituted)

87

Where

condenser

the

final

recoverY

device

the

recovery

system.

the

average

exit

(product

side)

temPerature

measured

least

every

minutes

and

averaged

over

the

same

 time period as the performance testing

while

the

vent

stream

normally

routed

and

constituted:

Q1

 Where a

carbon ~

 is the final recovery

device in the recovéry system, the total

stream

mass

volumetric

flow

measured

least every 15 minutes and averaged over the

same time period

 the performance testing

(full carbon bed cycle), the temperature of

the carbon bed after regeneration

 (and within

minutes

completion

any

cooling

cycle(s)),

 and duration of the carbon bed

steaming

cycle

(all

measured

while

the

vent

stream

normally

routed

and

constituted)

alternative

subsection

(a)

(4)

(A)

(a)(4)(B)

(a)(4)(C)

this

Section.

the

concentration level or reading indicated by

the

 organic monitoring device at the outlet

the

absorber.

condenser.

carbon

absorber. measured at least every 15 minutes

 and averaged over the same time period as the

performance testing

 (measured while the vent

stream is normally routed and constituted)

or

~

All

measurements and calculations performed

determine

the

flow

rate.

VON

concentration,

heating

value,

and

TRE

index

value

the

vent

stream.

~

 Every owner

or operator of a

reactor

distillation

unit

with

TRE

index

value

less

than

4.0

shall

subiect

the

exceedance

retorting

requirements

the

draft Enhanced Monitoring Guidelines as published at 58

Fed.

Reg.

54648

 (October 22,

 1993).

ci

EverY

owner

operator

source

seeking

comply

with

Section

218.432(b)

this

Subpart

shall

maintain

records of the following:

fl.

 AnY changes in production capacity. feedstock

~ype.

 catalyst

tv~e,

 or of anyre~lacement.

removal, or addition of recovery equipment or

reactors and distillation units: and

AnY

recalculation of the flow rate. VON

concentration, or TRE index value calculated

88

according to Section

 (c) of Appendix G of this

Part.

~j.

Every

owner

 or operator of a source claiming a design

capacity of less than

 1 gigagram

 (1,100 tons) Per year,

as contathed in Section 218.431Lb)

 of this Subpart.

~1Lall maintain records of the design capacity or any

chances in equipment or operations that maY affect the

design capacity.

EverY

owner

oPerator

 a source claiming a vent

stream

flow

rate

vent

stream

concentration

exemption

level. as contained in Section 218.431(b) (5) of this

Su~part.shall maintain records to indicate that the

stream flow rate is less than

0.0085

scm/mm

 or the

y~j~it

stream

concentration

less

than

500

ppmv.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

,

effective

Section

218.436

Compliance

Date

Every owner or oPerator of an source subiect to Sections 218.431,

218.432,

 218.433.

 218.434 or 218.435

this

Subpart

shall

 comply

with

its

standards,

limitations

and

 mandates

by

Narch 15.

 1996.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

,

effective

____

_______________________________________________________)

SUBPART

DD:

AEROSOL

CAN

 FILLING

Section 218.686

 Control Requirements

a)

 Every owner or operator of an aerosol can filling line

that is filling cans with a propellant which contains

propane, butane or other VON subject to this Subpart

shall comply with the following requirements:

1)

Emission

capture

and

control

techniques

which

achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VON

emission of at least 81

 from the propellant

filling area,

 also known as the gas house, on each

line; or

2)

 As an alternative to compliance with subsection

(a) (1)

abovcof

 this Subpart, the owner or operator

of an aerosol

can

 filing

line,- shall comply

with

the following requirements:

Fill

all

cans,

other

 than trial runs of cans

to verify product quality, using through-the-

valve fill or enhanced under-the-cup

fill

to

minimize

loss

VON propellant;

use

reclamation system to recover surplus

VOM

89

propellant

use

another

system

approved

a federally enforceable permit which achieves

at least 75

 reduction of the emissions of

under-the-cup

fill;

B)

 Fill

on a monthly basis at least 90

 of cans

filled

such

aerosol

can

filling

lines

that

are capable of being filled

by

the through-

the-valve

method

 with through-the-valve fill.

All

cans

shall

considered

capable

being

filled

by

the

through-the-valve

method

unless,

demonstrated

by

the

records

required

by

Section

218.692(b) (2)

this

Part,

the

valve

assembly

not

adaptable

the through-the-valve fill;

 through-the-

valve fill cannot be accomplished with at

least 85

 of the under-the-cup operating rate

cans

per

minute

filling;

and~

performance,

that

the

discharge

the

can’s

contents

accomplish

its

 intended

function,

negatively

affected

by

through-

the—valve fill considering factors such as

propellant solubility in the can’s contents

and

the

amount

turbulence

which

the

contents may experience during propellant

filling; and

C)

Verify

proper

filling

cans

with

VON

monitoring

system

the

gas

house.

This

system may monitor VOM concentration as a

percentage of the lower explosive limit.

b)

Every

owner

operator

propellant

booster

pump

associated with an aerosol can filling line subject to

this Subpart shall comply with one of the following

requirements:

Emission

capture

and

control

techniques

which

achieve

overall

reduction

uncontrolled

VON

emission

least

from

each

pump.

the

pumps

are

located

the

gas

house

filling

line,

compliance

with

this

reduction

may

achieved by the combination of the pumps located

in the gas house and the propellant filling area;

or

2)

 Work practices to prevent leaks from a pump,

meaning

loss

VON

from

the

 pump

above

background levels.

 Work practices shall include

changing seals every four

 (4) weeks and plungers

every 16 weeks unless a pump monitoring procedure

approved in a federally enforceable permit

establishes otherwise.

90

(Source:

 Amended at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

,

effective

—

______________________________________________________________)

SUBPART

FF:

 BAKERY

OVENS

Section 218.720

 Applicability

.~j

The

provisions

this

Subpart

shall

apply

every

owner

operator

source

which

operates

bakery

oven,

defined

Ill.

Adm.

 Code 211.680, unless

the source bakes products only for on—site human

consumption or on—site retail sale.

~

 Notwithstanding subsection

(a)

 of this Section.

a

source is required to comply with the control

requirements of this Subpart only if the source has the

potential to emit

22.7 Mg

(25

tons)

 or more of

VOM

per

year,

the

aggregate,,

from

all

emission

units

the

source, excluding:

fl

 Emission units regulated

by

Subparts B.

E.

F.

H,

0.

R.

 S. T

(excluding Section 218.486 of this

Part),

V.

X,

Y,

Z

BB

this

Part;

and

 Emission units that are included in any of

the

following categories:

 synthetic organic chemical

manufacturing industry

 (SOCNI)

distillation.. SOCNI

reactors. wood furniture coating, plastic carts

coating

 (business machines), plastic parts coating

(other). offset litho~a~hy.industrial

wastewater. autobodv refinishing, SOCMI batch

processing. volatile organic liquid storage tanks

and clean—up solvents operations.

 Every owner or operator of a source which has limited

its potential to emit below 22.7 Mg

 (25 tons)

 of VON

per

year.

specified

subsection

(b)

this

Section.

through

federally

enforceable

permit

conditions

not

required

comply

with

this

Subpart.

~ì

Every

owner

operator

baker~y oven

which

exempt

from

the

control

requirements

this

Subpart

because of the criteria in subsection

(b)

 of this

Section remains subject to the record)ceepin~and

reporting requirements of Section 218.728(b)

 of this

Subpart and the certification requirements in Section

218.730(d) of this Subpart.

(Source:

Added

______

Ill.

Reg.

,

effective

—

____________________________________________________________)

Section 218.722

 Control Requirements

~ry

 Owner or operator of

source

subject

n.~r2lreouirements

this

Subpart

shall

comply

with

~fl~xe~irements

subsection

(a)

(1)

(a)

(2)

this

gection

for

each

bakery

oven

with

rated

heat

input

Q~c~f~y~gf

least

2

 mmbtu/hr or at least

 586 kW:

Q~.r~te emissions

capture

and

control

ej~uipment

3~h

achieves

overall

reduction

~fl~ntrolled

VON

 emissions of

at

least

percent

from

each

such

bakery

oveni

rovjdean

uivalent

alternative

control

plan

for

such bakery ovens

 at the source which has been

~pprod

 by the Agency

and

USEPA

through

fe~eral1y

~Dforceable permicondtsas

S~

revision.

-j~

o.~ne.r or

oper~rc~-

.~‘ourc~

~i~ect

 ‘co the control

1 o1~2~~nit~-

~~u~p~rt

imay

 ect to ~xe~mpt from

~r~t~O1_r~

Lcjr~flts

:lri

 ‘~ut~sections~

or

~

 th:is Section

any

ba)rery

 ~~c’~s

Le~

than or equal to 15

TJ_~~e~tr~at_the

 t-ctal actual

VON

 iss.~on~f~oin

er~

o~ns

e~e~25

 ~T~X

NotVathagth~

r

 i±~ii~-ent~in

 ~b~.~:.(a)a4~

~

 March 15

 1~9~

only

 a source n~

E?~

ect

tO

 c-Um

V~dth

the

control

requi~~fl~~:.

~n

sc~lc~ii~jor~icj

~2).cf

 th:i~:ct~o..~t~

than:: the

cont

 r~qi~rement~

 in ~

or

1a~t2I~ f~*h~ ~

~n th— ~g’

~

 exc~uci~~

~

 R) S~

~~c~~tiôn

~iA~~çf

t~is

S~bpa~J,

V

o~~3B

of

th&s

~

 t~ave

maxi~r~t~’eoretica1

TLiSs1or~s

Of

less

~.n:

 QQ~JL

NL

00

 ~oVo~

De.r

~

~

to~Ss

than

907

(100

 .toris:) .~fvoMem.i

ccilcndarvcar

the

absence

 of ~ar pollution control

L.~1

J~’...-

4~Y

~~-“k~

fepe

 ly ~~rc

 bIe~p

 ___pr~ditign~P~

jfla

 SIP revision

ii•~

era

 ~i~on~cap~ure

~

W~ic~acn~ev~s a~~vera?I

 reduction

~

~nco~tro1..ed Vo~

~

of

~.t

least 60 p~rc~n~

bake~

 ~at~h~

~~a~ity

 of at.

leest:2

~btuIhr

...

..........

.........

.... ....... ... .....

.....

.....

.......

~

such

b~akerv.

~

~

 ....sou

~

~r~j

.a~3

LSEPA

 throi~qh

fe~dera11y

92

~

~

 bakery oven that becomes subject to the

requirements of this Subpart at any time shall remain

sublect to the requirements of this Subpart at all

times thereafter.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

,

effective

Section 218.726

 Testing

~

 Upon request by

the

Agency,

the

owner

operator

 bakery oven shall.

 at its own expense. conduct such

tests in accordance with the applicable test methods

and procedures specified in Section 218.105(f)

 of this

Part to demonstrate compliance with the control

requirements of this Subpart and shall:

,3j

 Notify the AgencY 30 days prior to conducting such

tests; and

 Submit all test results to the A~encvwithin

days of conducting such tests.

“

~j

 Nothing in this Section shall limit the authority of

USEPA Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

(CAM

to require

testing, or shall affect the authority of USEPA under

Section 114 of the

CAA (42 U.S.C.

7414

 (1990)).

(Source:

 Added at

 Ill. Reg.

,

effective

Section 218.727

 Monitoring

,~j,,

 Every owner or operator of a bakery oven subject to the

control requirements of this Subpart shall install and

operate at all times a device to continuously monitor

the following parameters for each tYpe of control

device as follows:

fl

 For catalytic oxidizers, the inlet and outlet

temperatures

the

oxidizer

For

regenerative

oxidizers,

the

 temperature in the

combustion chamber: or

.~j..

For

thermal

incinerators,

the

temperature

the

combustion chamber.

The

owner

operator

may

monitor

with

alternative

method or monitor other parameters

 if approved by

the

,~oencvand USEPA through federally enforceable pe~it

conditions

 or as

 a SIP revision.

(Source

 Added at

 Ill.

 Reg.

_________,

 effective

ctiop~,2~22~.

 Recordkeening and Reporting

Every

owner

onerator

of

 a bakery oven shall maintain

the

following

records

for

the

most

recent

consecutiVe

~r

 period for all bakery ovens

 sub~iectto the control

~~qp1reInents

this

Subpart.

Such

records

shall

made

 available to the Agency immediately upon reqiJest.

1)

 Parameters for control devices

 as monitored

pj~rsuantto Section 218.727

 of this Subpart~

~j,

 Hrs/day of operation of each bakery oven~

~j,

 Factors necessary to calculate VON emissions for

 all bakery ovens

 including,

 but not limited ~

type

dough

used

for

each

yeast—leavened

baked

product~ ~

product, total fermentation time for eacfl~ypduct,

any

 additional percentage

 of yeast added, and the

,f~~nent

 ation

time

any

additional

ye

Calculated

daily

VON

emissions

each

bakery

oven

~pressed

aslbsJday:

~J

Total

amount

each

type

yeast—leavened

bread

product produced by each bakery oven expressed

as

lbs/day.

~

 EverY~,Qwn~r

operator

 of’

 a bakeryov ~

 which,

J~.

pt from the control requirements

 of this Subpart

because of the criteria

 in Section

 218.720(b)

 of this

part shall maintain records necessary to demonstrate

that its potential to emit is less than 22.7 Mg

(25

tons),pf VON ~

 ~eçtjo~

318.720(b).

 Such records

 shall be maintained for the

most recent consecutive

 3 year period and shall be made

available to the Ag~cy imr~ediatelyupon request.

“~-~-.~‘

~

~

because of the

criteria

 .si~ec~fied

 .in Sectao~

218~722~b~

-~.

.....

.....

.....

...

......

..........................

...

~

d

~‘

 ~-~a’~

e~mp

___

~

~

 ~b~l~e

94

~1aant.a~-ie~3

 fcr ~e

 most recent consecuta’v~.3 ye.ar

anc shall

 be made available to

the

~py

~e~aately

 upon re~uest,j.~.~nd

~j,

~Ct1fV

 th~?~ency

~‘ratlng’

lf~the

 actupl

VON

~1Ss

ions

 fro~an e~erptbakery

oven

eve~

 exceed

~5

~IP~?or

tbe

 actua’ VO~

 ~sions

 ~‘ro~ a

~th3flatjo~ of

e~empt b~k~r

over~ev.~r~

~PY.,

within

 days after

the

e~ceed~nce

~occurs

Such notice shall include a copy of’ all ~recor~e

of

DveT~owner

o~operator

 ot’ a ba~ry

oven wb~.tcb.~.s

confro~.la~.q

sac~-~s

.as

provided

ect~~7~c.)

g.this

.Siibpart

 until ~arrh

 15.,

 1998.. eh~1l alntaln

records necessary to demonstrate tl~atits ma~~m~m

~~7~Lç),

~e

 less t~an9Q ,.~g ~

recent

consecutive

year

i~eri~d and

 sba).1 be ~made

available to the Agency

~.m~ediatel~y

upon

reuUe~t~.

(SourCe

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

__________,

 effective

~qmp1iance

 Date

~ii

an~

fter~arch

15,

1996,

upon

initial

startup

upon

2jcat~0~~

 Y~ry,.o~,er~

 ,a~sour~cesubjeç~io,ti~

subpax~3.h~iIcom0lVwith the reciuirements of this

Subpart.

(Source

Added

Ill.

Reg.

__________,

 effective

s~

ctior

 218,,,

 Certification

~ije~-v

owner

operator

source

sublect

the

control

requirements

this

Subpart

shall

certify

~,g~1iance

 with this Subpart on or before a

date

consastent with Section 218.729

 of this

Subpart.

an

owner

operator

bakery

 oven subject to the

controj,

 reauirements

of

this Subpart changes the methg~

of compliance,

 the owner

 or operator shall certify

comoliance with the reauirements

 of this

Subpart for

the alternative method upon

changing the method of

commliance.

All

 certifications

 of comoliance with this Subpart

shall include the results

 of all tests and the

calculations Derformed

 to demonstrate that each oven at

the source

is

 in comoijance

 with,

or

 is exempt

 from1,.

the control recuirements

 of this Subpart.

The

certlfication sha~? include the foilowina:

1)

 l13~name and identification number of_each oven

~

 ~py associated caoture and contro,l deyige~

2J

~

 Tp,.rnr

e

 heat input

Q,f

 each,.,,,o~enL

,~j,.

 A classification of each oven as either

 a “bakery

oven”

defined

 Ill.

Adm.

Code

211.680

an oven used exclusively to bake non—yeast—

leavened oroducts

The capture and control efficiency

 of each bakery

oven

control

device;

Test reoorts, calculations,

 and other data

necessary to demonstrate that the capture and

control efficiency of each bakery oven control

device

achieves

overall

reduction

uncontrolled

VON

emissions

least

percent

and

,~j

 The date each bakery oven control device was

installed

and

operating.

~j

 OnOl’

 before March

15,

 1996,

 or upon

 initial startup~

every owner

 or operator of a bakery oven which

is

from

the

control

requirements

this

Subpart

because

the

criteria

Section

218.720(b)

this

~~p~rt

 shall certify that its potential to emit

is

less than

 22.7 Mg

(25

 tons)

 of VON per year,

as

~çified

Section

218.720(b).

 onor before ~arch

 1:5,

 or upon

~mtia1

 startup

~v~o~ner

or

operator of ~

 ..~V~flf’h~j~e

exempt

 from the

control: reouir~ament~:’Of

~tec?U

se ~±

the

crateri.a

 s~ec~.f,.te~

an

Sect ion

218.722

b’)

this

 Subpart shall certify

 that

act.u:.VO::is~i.ofl~

~7i

an

a

 ~yemn t

o-v-e

n never

e~ceed

 1,.~

and

that

VON

 emission~from

~

c~cns. in

tne

acgr~,qate never

e~.ceed

 T,PY~

±j

Q1Lo~.fOre

r.ch

 :,~i~t5____

____

rricr:”tc~arch j5~:..lg98...

e~,rv.:

 t~’o

bak,ce~,..~’)l~jch

~

 gpntrpi1i~g~_gpi

STOD

~s~rovade’a

bvsection

S

~

that ‘.its: maximum

 he~dre.t.ica~l::

~

~ect:on

2~I8

 22~c~

are

less

t~n 90

7

Mg

 ~1O0

 tons)

o.f

“

(Source

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

effective

SUBPART

RR:

NISCELLANEOUS

ORGANIC

CHENICAL

MANUFACTURING

 PROCESS

96

Section 218.966

 Control Requirements

Every

owner

operator

miscellaneous

organic

chemical

manufacturing

process

emission

unit

subject

 this Subpart shall

comply

with

the

requirements

subsection

(a),

(b),

(c)

bclow

of this Section.

Emission

capture

and

 control techniques which achieve

overall

reduction

 uncontrolled

VOM

emissions

at least 81 percent from each emission unit, or

(Board

Note:

For

the

purpose

 this provision, an

emission

unit

any

part

activity

 a source of a

type

that

by

itself

subject

control

requirements

other

Subparts

this

Part

CFR

60,

incorporated

by

reference

Section

218.112,

e.g.,

coating

line,

printing

line,

process

unit,

wastewater system, or other equipment, or is otherwise

any

part

activity

source.)

equivalent

alternative

control

plan

which

has

been

approved

by

the

 Agency and USEPA in a federally

enforceable permit or as a SIP revision.

c)

Any

leaks from components subject to the control

requirements

this

Subpart

shall

subject

the

following control measures by March 15,

 1995:

1)

 Repair any component from which a leak of VOL can

be observed.

 The repair shall be completed as

soon

practicable

but

later

than

days

after the leak is found, unless the leaking

component cannot be repaired until the process

unit is shut down,

 in which case the leaking

component

must

repaired

before

the

unit

restarted.

For

any

leak

which

cannot

 readily repaired

within one hour after detection, the following

records, as set forth in this subsection, shall be

kept.

 These records shall be maintained by the

owner or operator for a minimum

two

years

after

the date on which they

are

made.

Copies

the

records shall be made available to the Agency or

USEPA upon verbal or written request.

A)

The

name

and

identification

the

leaking

component;

B)

 The date and time the leak is detected;

C)

 The action taken to repair the leak;

and

D)

 The date and time the leak is repaired.

97

(Source:

Amended

____

Ill.

Reg.

effective

—

____________________________________________________________________)

SUBPART

TT:

OTHER

EMISSION

UNITS

Section 218.980

 Applicability

a)

 Maximum theoretical emissions:

1)

 A source is subject to this Subpart if it contains

process emission units not regulated by Subparts

B,

E,

 F (excluding Section 218.204(1)

 of this

Part),

(excluding

Section

218.405

this

Part),

(excluding

Section

218.486

this

Part),

this

Part,

which

group both:

Have

maximum

theoretical

emissions

90.7

(100

tons)

per

calendar

year

VON,

and

Are

not

limited

less

than

 90.7 Mg

 (100

tons)

VON

emissions

per

calendar

year

the absence of air pollution control

equipment through production or capacity

limitations contained in a federally

enforceable permit or a SIP revision.

2)

 If a source is subject to this Subpart as provided

abovcin this SubDart, the requirements of this

Subpart shall apply to a source’s VON emission

units which are not included within any of the

categories specified in Subparts B,

E,

F,

H,

Q,

R,

5,

T,

V,

X,

Y,

Z,

 AA, BB, PP,

QQ,

 or RR of this

Part

which

are

not

exempted

from

permitting

requirements pursuant to 35 Ill.

Adm.

Code

201.146.

Potential

emit:

1)

 A source is subject to this Subpart if it has the

potential

emit

 22.7 Mg

(25

tons)

VOM

per

year,

aggregate,

from

emission

units,

other

than furnaces at glass container manufacturing

sources

and

VON

leaks

from

components,

that

are:

Not

regulated

Subparts

S,

T,

 (excluding Section 218.486 of

this

Part), V,

X,

1,

 Z, or BB of this Part,

or

B)

 Not included in any of the following

categories:

 synthetic organic chemical

manufacturing

industry

(SOCNI)

distillation,

SOCMI reactors, wood furniture, plastic parts

98

coating (business machines), plastic parts

coating

 (other), offset lithography,

industrial wastewater, autobody refinishing,

SOCNI batch processing, volatile organic

liquid storage tanks and clean—up solvents

operations.

2)

 If a source is subject to this Subpart as provided

above, the requirements of this Subpart shall

apply to a source’s VON emission units, which are:

A)

 Not included within any of the categories

specified in Subparts B,

E,

F,

H,

Q,

R,

S,

T,

V,

X,

Y,

 Z, AA,

BB,

CC,

 DD, PP, QQ or RR of

this Part, or which are not exempted from

permitting requirements pursuant to 35 Ill.

Adin. Code 201.146 (excluding Section

201.146(o)

and

 (p)), or

B)

 Not included in any of the following

categories:

 synthetic organic chemical

manufacturing industry (SOCMI)

 distillation,

SOCMI reactors, wood furniture, plastic parts

coating (business machines), plastic parts

coating

 (other), offset lithography,

industrial wastewater, autobody refinishing,

SOCMI batch processing, volatile organic

liquid storage tanks and clean—up solvents

operations.

C)

 If a source ceases to fulfill the criteria of

subsection

 (a) and/or

 (b) abovcof this Section, the

requirements of this Subpart shall continue to apply to

an emission unit which was ever subject to the control

requirements of Section 219.986 of this Part.

d)

 No limits under this Subpart shall apply to emission

units with emissions of VON to the atmosphere less than

or equal to 2.3 Mg

 (2.5 tons) per calendar year if the

total emissions from such emission units not complying

with Section 219.986 of this Part does not exceed 4.5

Mg

 (5.0 tons) per calendar year.

e)

 For the purposes of this Subpart, an emission unit

shall be considered regulated by a Subpart,

 if it is

subject to the limits of that Subpart.

 An emission

unit is considered not regulated by a Subpart if it is

not subject to the limits of that Subpart, e.g., the

emission unit is covered by an exemption in the Subpart

or the applicability criteria of the Subpart are not

met.

f)

 The control requirements in Subpart TT shall not apply

to sewage treatment plants; vegetable oil extraction

99

and processing; coke ovens

 (including by—product

recovery plants); fuel combustion units; bakeries;

barge loading facilities; jet engine test cells;

production of polystyrene foam insulation board

including storage and extrusion of scrap where blowing

agent is added to the polystyrene resin at the source,

but not including blending and preliminary expansion of

resin prior to molding where blowing agent is

incorporated into the polystyrene resin by the producer

of the resin; production of polystyrene or ~olvethvlene

foam packaging not including blending and preliminary

expansion of resin prior to molding where blowing agent

 is incorporated into the polystyrene resin by the

producer of the resin,

 and not including storage and

extrusion of scrap where blowing agent is added to the

polystyrene

resin

the

source;

iron

and

 steel

production;

and

furnaces

glass

container

manufacturing sources.

(Source:

 Amended at

_____

 Ill.

 Req.

_________,

 effective

Section 218.Appendix G

 TRE Index Measurements for SOCMI

Reactors and Distillation Units

For purposes of Subpart Q, Sections 218.431 through 218.435. the

following apply:

~j.

 The following test methods shall be used to determine

compliance

with

the

total

resource

 effectiveness

(“TRE”)

 index value:

jj

 Method 1 or 1A.

 incorporated by reference at

Section 218.112 of this Part,

 as approPriate.

for

selection

the

sampling

site.

Al

 The sampling site for the vent stream molar

composition determin&-ion and flow rate

prescribed in subsections

 (a) (2) and

 (a) (3)

this

A~~endjxshafl,

be.

except

for

the

situations outlined in subsection

 (a) (1) (B),

after the final recovery device,

 if a

recovery system is present, prior to the

inlet of any control device, and prior to any

post-reactor or post—distillation unit

introduction of halogenated compounds into

the vent stream.

 No traverse site selection

method

 needed for vents smaller than 10 cm

diameter.

~J..

 If any gas stream other than

the

reactor

distillation unit vent stream is normally

conducted

through

the

final

recovery

device:

100

jj

 The sampling site for vent stream flow

rate and molar composition shall be

prior to the final recovery device and

prior to the point at which any

nonreactor or nond~istillationunit vent

stream or stream from a nonaffected

reactor or distillation unit is

introduced.

 Method 18 incorporated by

reference at Section 218.112 of this

Part, shall be used to measure organic

compound concentrations at this site.

jj)

The

efficiency of the final recovery

device is determined bY measuring the

organic compound concentrations using

Method 18,

 incorporated by reference at

 Section 218.112 of this Part,

 at the

inlet to the final recovery device after

the introduction of all vent streams and

at the outlet of the final recovery

device.

iii) The efficiency of the final recovery

device determined according to

subsection

 (a) (1) (B) (ii) of this

Appendix shall be applied to the organic

compound concentrations measured

according to subsection

 (a) (1) (B) (i) ~f

this Appendix to determine the

concentrations of organic compounds from

the final recovery device attributable

to the reactor or distillation unit vent

stream.

 The resulting organic compound

concentrations are then used to perform

the calculations outlined in subsection

(a) (4) of this Appendix.

21

 The molar composition of the vent stream shall be

determined as follows:

Al

 Method 18, incorporated bY reference at

Section 218.112 of this Part, to measure the

concentration of organic compounds including

those containing halogens

~j

 ASTM D1946-77.

 incorporated by reference at

Section 218.112 of this Part,

 to measure the

concentration of carbon monoxide and

hydrogen: and

~j

 Method 4. incorporated by reference at

Section

218.112

this

Part,

measure

the

content

water

vapor.

101

fl

 The volumetric flow rate shall be determined using

Method

2.

2A,

 2C. or 2D, incorporated by reference

at Section 218.112 of this Part, as appropriate.

j).

The

emission

rate

VON

(minus

methane

and

ethane)

 (EVOM)

 in the vent stream shall be

calculated using the following formula:

n

LOM

K~E

Cj~Q~

where:

~VOM

Emission

rate

VON

(minus

methane

and

ethane)

 in the sample. kg/hr.

Constant,

2.494

10~ (l/ppmv)(g—

mole/scm)

(kg/g)

 (min/hr). where standard

temperature

for

(g—mole/scm)

20°C.

Concentration

compound

i,

on a dry

basis,

 in ppntv as measured bY Method 18,

incorporated by reference at Section

218.112 of this Part,

 as indicated in

Section 218.433(c) (3)

 of this Part.

Molecular weight of sample

 i, g/g-mole.

 Vent stream flow rate

 (scm)

 at a

temperature of

 20°C.

~j

 The total vent stream concentration

 (by volume) of

compounds containina halogens

 (ppmv, by compound)

shall

summed

from

the

individual

concentrations

of compounds containing haloaens which were

measured by Method 18, incorporated by reference

at Section 218.112 of this Part.

~

 The net heating value of the vent stream shall be

calculated using the following:

n

UT

E

____

where:

Net

heatina

value

the

sample

(MJ/scm~.

 where the net enthaply per

mole

of”vent

stream

based

combustion of 25°Cand 760

mmHG.

but the

standard temperature for determining the

volume

corresponding

one

mole

102

25°C,

as in the definition of~Q~(vent

stream

flow

rate).

i~1

 Constant, 1.740 x

10~ (ppmvY’

(a—mole/scm).

(MJ/KCal).

where

standard

temperature

for

(p—mole/scm)

20°C.

 Water vapor content of the vent stream.

proportion by volume; except that if the

vent

stream

passes

through

final

stream

-let

and

not

condensed,

shall

assumed

that

 0.023

in

order to correct to 2.3 percent

moisture.

Concentration on a dry basis of compound

 in ppmv,

measured

for

all

organic

compounds by Method 18, incorporated by

reference at Section 218.112 of this

Part,

and

measured

for

hydrogen

and

carbon

monoxide

using

ASTM

D1946-77,

incorporated

reference

Section

218.112

this

Part.

JJ~

 Net heat of combustion of compound

kCal/g-mole, based on combustion at 25°C

and

760

mmHG.

The

heats

combustion

vent

stream

components

shall

determined using ASTN D2382-83,

incorporated by reference at Section

 218.112

of this Part.

 if published

values are not available or cannot be

calculated.

The

TRE

index

value

the

vent

shall

calculated

using

the

followina:

l1a+b(Q3)+c(H~)+d(E~0~jj.

LOM

where:

TRE index value.

&OM

 Hourly emission rate of VON

 (kg/hr) as

calculated in subsection

 (a) (4) of this

Appendix.

 Vent stream flow rate scm/mm

 at a

standard temperature of 20°C.

103

UT

 Vent stream net heating value

 (NJ/scm),

as calculated in subsection

 (a) (6)

of

this Appendix.

LOM

 Hourly emission rate of VON (minus

methane and ethane),

 (kg/hr) as

calculated in subsection

 (a) (4)

 of this

Appendix.

a,b,

 Value of coefficients presented below

c,d

are:

Value

Coefficients

Type of Stream

 Control Device Basis

a

b

c

d

Nonhaloaenated

 Flare

 2.129

 0.183

 -0.005

 0.359

Thermal incinerator

 3.075

 0.021

 -0.037

 0.018

zero

 (0) Percent heat

Recovery

Thermal incinerator

 3.803

 0.032

 —0.042

 0.007

70

Percent heat

Recovery

Halogenated

 Thermal incinerator

 5.470

 0.181

 -0.040

 0.004

and scrubber

21

 Every owner or operator of a vent stream shall use

the applicable coefficients identified for values

a, b,

c,

 and d in subsection

 (b) (1) of this

Appendix to calculate the TRE index value based on

a flare,

 a thermal incinerator with zero

(0)

percent heat recovery, and a thermal incinerator

with 70 percent heat recovery, and shall select

the

lowest

TRE

index

 value.

fl

 EverY owner or operator of a reactor or

distillation unit with a halogenated vent stream.

determined as anY stream with a total

concentration of haloaen atoms contained in

organic compounds of 200 o~mvor greater, shall

use_the

 applicable coefficients identified for

values a,

 b. c and d in subsection

 (b)(l) of this

Appendix to calculate the TRE index value based on

a thermal incinerator and scrubber.

g~

 Every owner or operator of a source seeking to com~lv

with Section 218.432(b) of this Part shall recalculate

the

flow

rate

and

VON

concentration

for

each

 affected

vent

stream

whenever

process

changes

are

made.

Examples of process chanaes include, but are not

limited to. changes in production capacity. feedstock

type,

or catalyst type.

 or whenever

there

is

104

replacement. removal, or addition of recovery

equiPment.

The

flow

rate

and

VON

concentration

shall

recalculated

based

test

data.

best

engineering estimates of the effects of the chanae to

the recovery system.

~j

 Whenever a process change,

 as defined in Section

218.435(c)

 of this Subpart, yields a

TRE

index value of

1.0 or less, the owner or operator shall notify and

submit a report to the Aaencv according to the

requirements specified in Section 218.435(c)

 of this

Subpart, within 180 calendar days after the process

change

and

shall

conduct

 a performance test according

the

methods

and

Procedures

reauired

Section

218.433

this

Part.

For

the

purpose

demonstrating

that

process

vent

stream

has

VON

concentration

below

500

ppmv.

the

following shall be used:

~j.

 The sampling site shall be selected as specified

in Section 218.433(c) (1) of this

Part.

21

 Method 18

Method

25A

CFR

Part

60,

Appendix

incorporated

reference

Section

218.112

this

Part,

shall

used

measure

concentration; alternatively, any other method or

data that has been validated according to the

protocol in Method 301 of 40 CFR Part 63. Appendix

A.

 incorporated by reference at Section 218.112 of

this Part, maY be used.

,~J.

Where

Method

is

used,

the

following

procedures

shall be used to calculate ~Pmv concentration:

The

minimum

sampling

time

for

each

run

shall

be

hour

which

either

integrated

sample or four grab samPles shall be taken.

If arab sampling is used, then the samples

shall be taken at a~~roximatelyea~ual

intervals in time, such as 15 minute

intervals during the run.

jjj..

The

concentration of VON shall be calculated

using

Method

according

Section

218.433(c)

(4)

this

Part.

il

 Where

Method 25A is used, the followina procedures

shall be used to calculate p~mvVOM concentration:

j)

 Method 25A shall be used onlY if a single VON

is greater than 50 percent of total VOM. by

volume, in the Process vent stream.

105

JJJ.

The

vent

 stream composition may be determined

by either orocess knowledge, test data

collected using an appropriate Reference

Method or a method of data collection

validated

according

the

protocol

Method

301

of

CFR Part

63,

Appendix

incorporated by reference at Section 218.112

 of this Part.

 Examples of information that

constitute process knowledae include

calculations based on material balances,

process stoichiometry. or previous test

results provided the results are still

relevant to the current Process vent stream

conditions.

iii)

The

VON

used

the

calibration

gas

for

Method

25A

shall

the

single

VON

present

areater

than

percent

the

total

VON

volume.

~

The

sean

value

for

Method

25A

shall

ppmv.

Use

Method

25A

acceptable

the

response

from

the

high—level

calibration

gas

least

times

the

standard

deviation

the

response

from

the

zero

calibration

aas

when the instrument is zeroed on the most

sensitive scale.

yjj

The

concentration

VON

shall

corrected

to

3

percent

oxygen

usina

the

procedures

and

equation in Section 218.433(c) (3) of this

Part.

~

The

owner

or operator shall demonstrate that the

concentration of VON, including methane and

ethane, measured by Method 25A is below 250 p~mv

aualify

for

the

low

concentration

exclusion

Section

218.431

this

Part.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

__________,

 effective

____

__________________________________________________)

Section 218.Appendix H

 Baseline VON Content Limitations for

Subpart F. Section 2L8.212 Cross—Line

Averagina

This Appendix contains limitations for purposes of determining

compliance

with

the

reciuirements

 Section 218.212 of this Part.

A source must establish that.

 at very least. each ~articipatina

coating

line

used

for

purposes

cross—line

averaging

meets

the

Federal

Implementation

Plan

level

VON

content,

listed

106

below.

The

emission

limitations

for

participating

coating

lines

that

must

not

exceeded

are

 follows:

ka/l

 lb/gal

~j

 Automobile or Light-Duty

Truck

Coating

.~j

Prime

coat

0.14

(1.2)

 Primer

surface

coat

1.81

(15.1)

(Note:

 The primer surface coat limitation is in

units of kg

 (lbs)

 of VON per

1

 (aal)

 of coating

solids deposited.

 Compliance with the limitation

shall be based on the daily—weiahted averaae from

an entire primer surface operation.

 Compliance

shall be demonstrated in accordance with the

topcoat protocol referenced in Section 218.105(b)

and the recordkeeping and reportina recruirements

specified in Section 218.211(f). Testing to

demonstrate compliance shall be performed in

accordance with the topcoat protocol and a

detailed testing proposal a~~rovedby the Aaencv

and USEPA specifying the method of demonstrating

compliance with the protocol. Section 218.205 does

not ap~lvto the primer surface limitation.)

kg/i

 lb/gal

~J.

 Topcoat

 1.81

 (15.1)

(Note:

 The topcoat limitation is in units of ka

(lbs)

 of VON ~er

1

 (cral)

 of coating solids

deposited.

Compliance

with

the

limitation

shall

be based on the daily—weighted average from an

entire topcoat operation.

 Compliance shall be

demonstrated in accordance with the topcoat

protocol referenced in Section 218.105(b)

 of this

Part and the recordkeeping and reporting

requirements specified in Section 218.211(f).

Testina_to

demonstrate

compliance

shall

performed

accordance

with

the

topcoat

protocol

and a detailed testing ~ro~osal approved by the

Aaencv and USEPA specifying the method of

demonstrating compliance with the protocol.

Section 218.205 of this Part does not apply to the

topcoat limitation.)

kg/l

 lb/gal

iL

 Final repair coat

 0.58

 (4.8)

~

Can

Coating

 kg/i

 lb/gal

.~j.

 Sheet basecoat and

overvarnish

 0.34

 (2.8)

107

Exterior

basecoat

and

overvarnish

0.34

(2.8)

21

 Interior

body

sDray

coat

0.51

(4.2)

41

Exterior

end

coat

0.51

(4.2)

Side

seam

spray

coat

0.66

(5.5)

.~1

End

sealing

comPound coat

 0.44

 (3.7)

kg/i

lb/aai

 PaPer Coating

 0.35

 (2.9)

(Note:

The

paper

coating

limitation

shall

not

apply

any

owner

operator

any

paper

coating

line

which printina is performed if the

paper

coating

line

complies

with

the

emissions

limitations

 in Subpart H:

Printing and Publishina. Section 218.401 of this Part.)

kg/i

 lb/gal

4)

 Coil Coating

 0.31

 (2.6)

~

 Fabric Coating

 0.35

 (2.9)

~j.. Vinyl Coating

 0.45

 (3.8)

gj

 Metal Furniture Coating

Air

Dried

0.36

(3.0)

21

 Baked

 0.36

 (3.0)

~j

 Larae

Appliance Coating

fl.

Air

Dried

0.34

(2.8)

Baked

0.34

(2.8)

(Note:

The

limitation

shall

not

apply

the

use

auick—drving

lacauers

for

repair

scratches

and

nicks

that

occur

 during assembly. provided that the volume of

coating does not exceed 0.95

1

 (1 quart)

 in any one

rolling eight—hour period.)

kg/i

 lb/aal

iL

Magnet

 Wire Coating

 0.20

 (1.7)

jI

 Miscellaneous

Metal Parts and

Products Coating

fl

 Clear coating

 0.52

 j4.3)

108

21

 Extreme performance

coating

 Air Dried

 0.42

 (3.5)

Baked

0.42

(3.5)

21

Steel

pail

and

drum

0.52

(4.3)

interior coating

41

All

other coatings

 Air Dried

 0.42

 (3.5)

Baked

0.36

(3.0)

Ic!

HeavY

Off-Highway

Vehicle

 kg/i

 lb/gal

Products Coating

fl.

 Extreme performance

 0.42

 (3.5)

prime coat

 Extreme performance top- 0.42

____

coat

 (air dried)

21

 Final repair coat

 0.42

 (3.5)

(air dried)

41

All

other coatings are subiect to the emission

limitations for miscellaneous metal parts and

products coatings in subsection

(1)

 above.

Wood Furniture Coating

 ka/l

 lb/gal

jj

 Clear topcoat

 0.67

21

 Opaque stain

 0.56

 (4.7)

 Pigmented coat

 0.60

 (~01

41

 RePair coat

0.67

j~6)

~

 Sealer

 0.67

 j~6)

~j

 Semi-trans~arentstain

0.79

 (6.61~

fl

 Wash coat

 0.73

 (6.1)

(Note:

 owner

or operator of

wood

furniture

coating operation subiect to this Section shall

 apply all coatings, with the exception of no more

than 37.8

1

 (10 cral)

 of coating per day used

for

touch—un and repair operations. using one or more

of the following application systems:

 airless

109

spray application system, air—assisted airless

spray application system, electrostatic spray

application system, electrostatic bell or disc

spray application system, heated airless spray

application system. roller coating, brush or wipe

coating application system, dip coating

application system or high volume low pressure

(HVLP)

application system.)

~j

 Existing Diesel-Electric Locomotive Coating Lines

in Cook County

ka/l

 lb/gal

fl

 Extreme performance

prime

coat

0.42

(3.5)

21

 Extreme performance

topcoat

 (air dried)

 0.42

 (3.5)

IL

 Final repair coat

(air dried)

 0.42

 (3.5)

41

 High-temperature

aluminum coating

 0.72

L6.O)

~j.

All

other coatings

 0.36

 (3.0)

~J

 Plastic Parts Coating:

 Automotive/Transportation

kg/l

 lb/gal

fl,.

 Interiors

 Baked

jI

 Color coat

 0.49

 (4.1)

La

 Primer

 0.46

 (3.8)

~l

 Air Dried

Li.

 Color coat

 0.38

 (3.2)

uI

 Primer

 0.42

 (3.5)

21

 Exteriors (flexible

and

non-flexible)

Al

 Baked

 Primer

 0.60

 (5.0)

jj).

 Primer non—

 0.54

 (4.5)

flexible

110

iii)

Clear

coat

0.52

(4.3)

jyl

 Color coat

 0.55

 (4.6)

Air

Dried

iL

 Primer

0.66

(5.5)

~il

Clear

coat

0.54

(4.5)

iii)

Color

coat

0.67

(5.6)

(red

 & black)

J.3L1

 Color coat

(others)

 0.61

 (5.1)

Specialty

Al

Vacuum

metailizing

0.66

(5.5)

basecoats,

texture

basecoats

Black

coatings,

0.71

(5.9)

reflective

argent

coatings, air

bag cover coatinas.

and soft coatings

çj

Gloss

reducers,

0.77

(6.4)

vacuum metallizing

topcoats, and

texture topcoats

121

 Stencil coatings,

 0.82

 (6.8)

adhesion

primers,

ink pad coatings,

electrostatic prep

coatings,

and

resist

coatings

Head

lamp

lens

0.89

(7.4)

coatings

,~j

 Plastic Parts Coating:

 Business Machine

ka/l

 lb/gal

fl

 Primer

 0.14

 (1.2)

21

 Color coat

(non—

0.28

(2.3)

texture coat)

 Color coat (texture

 0.28

 (2.3)

coat)

111

41

 Electromagnetic

interference/radio

freczuency interference

(ENI/RFI)

shielding coatings

~

 Specialty Coatings

Al

 Soft coat

____

~j

 Plating resist

____

Plating

sensitizer

0.85

 (7.1)*

(Source:

Added

____

Ill.

Reg.

 —, effective

TITLE

35:

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION

SUBTITLE B:

 AIR POLLUTION

CHAPTER

I:

 POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

SUBCHAPTER c:

 EMISSIONS

STANDARDS AND

LIMITATIONS

FOR STATIONARY SOURCES

PART 219

ORGANIC

MATERIAL

EMISSION

STANDARDS AND

LIMITATIONS

FOR

THE

METRO EAST AREA

SUBPART A:

 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section

219.100

219.101

219.102

219.103

219.104

219.105

219.106

219.107

219.108

219.109

219.110

219.111

219.112

219.113

Section

219.121

219.122

219

123

219.124

219.125

Introduction

Savings Clause

Abbreviations and Conversion Factors

Applicability

Definitions

Test

Methods

and

Procedures

Compliance Dates

Operation of Afterburners

Exemptions, Variations, and Alternative Means of

Control or Compliance Determinations

Vapor Pressure of Volatile Organic Liquids

Vapor Pressure of Organic Material or Solvent

Vapor Pressure of Volatile Organic Material

Incorporations

Reference

Monitoring

for

Negligibly-Reactive

Compounds

SUBPART

ORGANIC

EMISSIONS

FROM

STORAGE

AND

OPERATIONS

Storage

Containers

Loading Operations

Petroleum Liquid Storage Tanks

External Floating Roofs

Compliance Dates (Repealed)

0.48

 (4.0)

0.52

 14.3)

0.71

 (5.9)

112

SUBPART

C:

 ORGANIC EMISSIONS FROM

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

Separation Operations

Pumps and Compressors

Vapor Blowdown

Safety Relief Valves

SUBPART E:

 SOLVENT

CLEANING

Emission Limitations

Daily-Weighted Average Limitations

Solids Basis Calculation

Alternative Emission Limitations

Exemptions From Emission Limitations

Exemption From General Rule on Use of Organic Material

Compliance Schedule

Recordkeeping and Reporting

Cross—Line Averaging to Establish Compliance for

Coating Lines

219.213

 RecordkeePing and Reporting for Cross—Line Averaging

Participating Coating Lines

219.214

 Changing Compliance Methods

SUBPART G:

 USE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL

Section

219.301

219.302

219.303

219.304

Section

219.401

219.402

219

•

403

219.404

219.405

Use of Organic Material

Alternative Standard

Fuel Combustion Emission Units

Operations with Compliance Program

SUBPART H:

 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING

Flexographic and Rotogravure Printing

Applicability

Compliance Schedule

Recordkeeping and Reporting

Heatset-Web-Offset Lithographic Printing

219.126

 Compliance Plan (Repealed)

Section

219.141

219.142

219.143

219.144

Section

219.181

219.182

219.183

219.184

219.185

219. 186

Section

219.204

219.205

219.206

219.207

219.208

219.209

219.210

219.211

219

212

Solvent Cleaning in General

Cold Cleaning

Open Top Vapor Degreasing

Conveyorized Degreasing

Compliance Schedule (Repealed)

Test Methods

SUBPART F:

 COATING OPERATIONS

113

SUBPART

 LEA1~SFROM SYNTHETIC

ORGANIC

CHEMICAL AND POLYMER

MANUFACTURING PLANT

Section

219.421

219.422

219.423

219.424

219.425

219.426

219.427

219.428

219.429

219.430

219.431

219.432

219.433

219.434

219.435

219.436

General Requirements

Inspection Program Plan for Leaks

Inspection Program for Leaks

Repairing Leaks

Recordkeeping for Leaks

Report for Leaks

Alternative Program for Leaks

Open-Ended Valves

Standards for Control Devices

Compliance Date

 (Repealed)

Applicability

Control Requirements

Performance and Testing Requirements

Monitoring Reguirements

Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements

Compliance Date

SUBPART

R:

 PETROLEUM REFINING AND RELATED

INDUSTRIES;

ASPHALT

MATERIALS

Section

219.441

219.442

219.443

219.444

219.445

219.446

219.447

219.448

219.449

219.450

219.451

219.452

219.453

Section

219.461

219.462

219.463

219.464

 219.465

219.466

Petroleum Refinery Waste Gas Disposal

Vacuum Producing Systems

Wastewater

 (Oil/Water) Separator

Process Unit Turnarounds

Leaks:

 General Requirements

Monitoring Program Plan for Leaks

Monitoring Program for Leaks

Recordkeeping for Leaks

Reporting for Leaks

Alternative Program for Leaks

Sealing Device Requirements

Compliance Schedule for Leaks

Compliance Dates

 (Repealed)

SUBPART

RUBBER

AND

MISCELLANEOUS

PLASTIC

PRODUCTS

Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires

Green Tire Spraying Operations

Alternative Emission Reduction Systems

Emission Testing

Compliance Dates (Repealed)

Compliance Plan (Repealed)

SUBPART T:

 PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING

Section

114

219.480

219.481

219.482

219.483

219.484

219.485

219.486

219.487

219.488

219.489

Section

219.521

219.525

219.526

219.527

Section

219.541

Section

219.561

219.562

219.563

Section

219.581

219.582

219.583

219.584

219.585

219.586

Section

219.601

219.602

219.603

219.604

219.605

219.606

Applicability

Control of Reactors, Distillation Units,

 Crystallizers,

Centrifuges and Vacuum Dryers

Control of Air Dryers, Production Equipment Exhaust

Systems and Filters

Material Storage and Transfer

In—Process Tanks

Leaks

Other Emission Units

Testing

Monitoring for Air Pollution Control Equipment

Recordkeeping for Air Pollution Control Equipment

SUBPART V:

 AIR OXIDATION PROCESSES

Definitions

 (Repealed)

Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes

Testing and Monitoring

Compliance Date (Repealed)

SUBPART W:

 AGRICULTURE

Pesticide Exception

SUBPART

X:

 CONSTRUCTION

Architectural Coatings

Paving Operations

Cutback Asphalt

SUBPART Y:

 GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION

Bulk Gasoline Plants

Bulk Gasoline Terminals

Gasoline Dispensing Operations - Storage Tank Filling

Operations

Gasoline Delivery Vessels

Gasoline Volatility Standards

Gasoline Dispensing Operations - Motor Vehicle Fueling

Operations

 (Repealed)

SUBPART Z:

 DRY CLEANERS

Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners

Exemptions

Leaks

Compliance Dates

 (Repealed)

Compliance Plan (Repealed)

 Exception to Compliance Plan (Repealed)

115

219.607

219.608

219.609

219

610

219.611

219.612

219.613

Section

219.620

219.621

219.623

219.624

219.625

219.626

219.628

219.630

219.636

219.637

Section

219.640

219.642

219.644

Standards for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners

Operating Practices for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners

Program for Inspection and Repair of Leaks

Testing and Monitoring

Exemption for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners

Compliance Dates

 (Repealed)

Compliance Plan (Repealed)

SUBPART

AA:

PAINT

AND

INK

MANUFACTURING

Applicability

Exemption for Waterbase Material and Heatset-Offset Ink

Permit Conditions

Open-Top Mills, Tanks, Vats or Vessels

Grinding

Mills

Storage Tanks

Leaks

Clean Up

Compliance Schedule

Recordkeeping and Reporting

SUBPART BB:

 POLYSTYRENE PLANTS

Applicability

Emissions Limitation at Polystyrene Plants

Emissions Testing

SUBPART

FF:

BAKERY

OVENS

Section

219.720

219.722

219.726

219.727

219.728

219.729

219.730

219.875

219.877

219.879

219.881

219.883

219.886

Section

219.920

219.923

219.926

219.927

Applicability

Control Requirements

Testing

Monitoring

Recordkeeping and Reporting

Compliance Date

Lfi~ation

Applicability of Subpart BB (Renumbered)

Emissions Limitation at Polystyrene Plants

 (Renumbered)

Compliance Date (Repealed)

Compliance Plan (Repealed)

Special Requirements for Compliance Plan (Repealed)

Emissions Testing (Renumbered)

SUBPART PP:

 MISCELLANEOUS FABRICATED

PRODUCT MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

Applicability

Permit Conditions

Control Requirements

Compliance Schedule

116

219.928

 Testing

SUBPART

QQ:

 MISCELLANEOUS FORMULATION

MANUFACTURING

PROCESSES

Section

219.940

 Applicability

219.943

 Permit Conditions

219.946

 Control Requirements

219.947

 Compliance Schedule

219.948

 Testing

SUBPART

RR:

MISCELLANEOUS

ORGANIC

CHEMICAL

MANUFACTURING

PROCESSES

Section

219.960

 Applicability

219.963

 Permit Conditions

219.966

 Control Requirements

219.967

 Compliance Schedule

219.968

 Testing

SUBPART TT:

 OTHER EMISSION

UNITS

Section

219.980

 Applicability

219.983

 Permit Conditions

219.986

 Control Requirements

219.987

 Compliance Schedule

219.988

 Testing

SUBPART UU:

 RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING

Section

219.990

 Exempt Emission Units

219.991

 Subject Emission Units

Section 2l9.Appendix A:

 List of Chemicals Defining Synthetic

Organic Chemical and Polymer

Manufacturing

Section 219.Appendix B:

 VON Measurement Techniques for Capture

Efficiency

Section 219.Appendix C:

 Reference Test Methods For Air Oxidation

Processes

Section 219.Appendix D:

 Coefficients for the Total Resource

Effectiveness Index

 (TRE) Equation

Section 219.Appendix G:

 TRE Index Measurements for SOCMI

Reactors and Distillation Units

Section 219.Appendix H:

 Baseline VOM Content Limitations for

Subpart

F,

 Section 219.212 Cross—Line

Averaging

AUTHORITY:

 Implementing Section 10 and authorized by Section

28

 5 of the Environmental Protection Act

U~”Ue~’

~ta4~

117

•~•~

~

itcs

~7iJO

 a~d2~SJ.

SOURCE:

 Adopted

 at R9l-8

 at ~5 Ill.

 Reg.

12491,

 effective August

16,

 1991;

 amended

 in R91-24

 at 16

 Iii.

 Peg.

 13597,

 effective

AuaUSt

24,

 1992; amended in P91—30 at

16

 Ill. Peg.

 13883,

effective

Aug1~1St

24,

1992;

emergency

amendment

in

P93—12

Ill.

 Peg. 8295~ effective May 24,

 1993,

 for a maximum of 150

days,

 amended

 in P93-9

at

 17 IlL

 Peg.

 16918, effective September

27,

 1993 and October

21,

 1993; amended

 in P93—28

at

18

 Ill.

 Peg.

4242,

effective

March

3,

 1994;

 amended

 in P94—12 at 18 Iii.

 Peg.

14987,

effective

September

21,

1994;

amended

R9415

Ill.

Peg.

 16415,

 effective October 25,

 1994;

 amended in P94—16

Ill-

Peg.

 at 16980,

 effective November

15,

 1994; amended

in

P94—21

I3~1.

 Peg.

at

_____

,

effective ______________________

•~••~•~,

 Epnme~~ct~~p

~

~

SUBPART

F:

 COATING OPERATIONS

Section 219.204

 Emission Limitations

Except as provided

 in Sections 219.205,

 219.207 &f~&~

219.208

d 219~

 of this part Subpart, no owner or operator of

a

coating line

 shall apply at any time any coating

 in which the VO~M

content

exceeds

the

following

emission

limitations

f or

the

specified

coating.

Compliance

with

the

emission

limitations

1i~r~e~.

 w~h~fl~

ir

 this

Section

 r~qu~red

on and after

March

~

 Compliance with emission limitations not marked

wiLt~an

asteriS~~

~~,ired

until

~M~xc~

~

 The following

emission limitations are expressed

 in units

 of VON per volume

of

coating

(minus

water

and

any

compounds

which

are

specifically

exempted from the definition of VON)

 as applied at each

coating

applicator, except where noted.

 Compounds which are specifically

exempted from the definition

 of VON should be treated

 as water

for the purpose of calculating the “less water” part of

the

coating

composition.

Compliance

with

this

Subpart

must

demonstrated through

the

applicable coating analysis test methods

and

procedures

specified

Section

219.105(a)

this

Part

and

the

recordkeeping

 and reporting requirements specified in Section

219.211(c)

 of this P~a-~Subpart except where noted.

 (Note:

The

equation

presented

Section

219.206

this

Part

shall

used

to calculate emission limitations for determining compliance

by

add-on

controls,

credits

for

transfer

efficiency,

emissions

trades

and

cross—line

averaging.)

The

emission

limitations

are

follows:

a)

 Automobile or Light-Duty

 kg/l

 lb/gal

Truck Coating

1)

Prime

coat

0.14

 (1.2)

0.14*

______

118

2)

 Primer surface coat

 1.81

 (15.1)

1.81*

 (15.1)*

(Note:

 The primer surface coat limitation is in

units of kg

 (lbs)

 of VON per 1

 (gal)

 of coating

solids deposited.

 Compliance with the limitation

shall be based on the daily-weighted average from

an entire primer surface operation.

 Compliance

shall be demonstrated in accordance with the

topcoat protocol referenced in Section 219.105(b)

and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements

specified in Section 219.211(f). Testing to

demonstrate compliance shall be performed in

accordance with the topcoat protocol and a

detailed testing proposal approved by the Agency

and USEPA specifying the method of demonstrating

compliance with the protocol. Section 219.205 does

not apply to the primer surface limitation.)

kg/l

 lb/gal

3)

 Topcoat

 1.81

 (15.1)

1.81*

 (15.1~*

(Note:

 The topcoat limitation is in units of kg

(ibs)

 of VON per 1

 (gal)

 of coating solids

deposited.

 Compliance with the limitation shall

be based on the daily—weighted average from an

entire topcoat operation.

 Compliance shall be

demonstrated in accordance with the topcoat

protocol referenced in Section 219.105(b)

 of this

Part and the recordkeeping and reporting

requirements specified in Section 219.211(f).

Testing to demonstrate compliance shall be

performed in accordance with the topcoat protocol

and a detailed testing proposal approved by the

Agency and USEPA specifying the method of

demonstrating compliance with the protocol.

Section 219.205 of this Part does not apply to the

topcoat limitation.)

kg/i

 lb/gal

 Final repair coat

 0.58

 (4.8)

0.58*

 (4.8)*

b)

 Can Coating

 kg/i

 lb/gal

1)

 Sheet basecoat and

overvarnish

 0.34

I—’

119

2)

 Exterior basecoat and

overvarnish

 0.34

 (2.8)

0.25*

 (2.1)*

3)

 Interior body spray coat

u.~i

—

Two

piece

 0.51

 (4.2)

0.44*

 (3.7)*

B)

 Three piece

 0.51

 (4.2)

0.51*

 (4.2)*

 Exterior end coat

0.51

(4.2)

0.51*

(4.2)*

 Side seam spray coat

 0.66

 (5.5)

0.66*

(5.5)*

 End sealing

 0.44

 (3.7)

compound coat

 0.44*

 (3.7)*

kg/l

 lb/gal

c)

 Paper Coating

 0.35

 (2.9)

0.28*

 (2.3)*

(Note:

 The paper coating limitation shall not apply to

any owner or operator of any paper coating line on

which printing is performed if the paper coating line

complies with the emissions limitations in Subpart H:

Printing and Publishing, Section8 219.401 of this

Part.)

kg/i

 lb/gal

d)

 Coil Coating

 0.31

 (2.6)

0.20*

 (1.7)*

e)

 Fabric Coating

 0.35

 (2.9)

0.28*

 (2.3)*

f)

 Vinyl Coating

 0.45

 (3.8)

0.28*

 (2.3)*

g)

 Metal Furniture Coating

 v.36

1)

 Air dried

 0.36

 (3.0)

0.34*

 (2.8)*

2)

 Baked

 0.36

 (3.0)

 0.28*

 (2.3)*

h)

 Large Appliance Coating

p.34

 (2.8)-

~

 Air dried

 0.34

 (2.8)

0.34*

 (2.8)*

120

-3-2)

 Extreme performance

 0.42

coating

 Air dried

 0.42

0.42*

lb/gal

(1.7)

(1.7) *

(4.3)

(4.3)

(3.5)

(3.

Baked

43)

Steel

pail

and

 drum

interior coating

~4)

 All other coatings

Air

Dried

Baked

MetalJ.i.c

 ccatj.nc

fL!42

Q:.IQ±.

U~~b

0.42

 (3.5)

40*

*

0.36

 (3.0)

______

L~4Z

 .42*

______

t..~.

~

o.~

 (3.0

~

36~

Or*

F

 r~.ce~of ~uhsecti~i

~

Srct~cr

 ~ctE

 113C

~t2

 n’~’ ~

 L’ia Wh1C~

2crr~:~1s

ore ~a’

‘~

1

c

—

0.34

 (2.8)

0.28*

 (2.3)*

(Note:

The

limitation

shall

not

 apply to the use of

quick-drying lacquers for repair of scratches and nicks

that occur during assembly, provided that the volume of

coating does not exceed 0.95

1

 (1 quart)

 in any one

rolling eight-hour period.)

kg/l

i)

 Magnet Wire coating

 0.20

0.20*

_______

Miscellaneous Metal Parts and

products Coating

1)

 Clear coating

 0.52

0.52*

_______

•

—I

0.52

0.52*

(4.3)

(4.3) *

121

k)

 Heavy

Off-Highway Vehicle

 kg/l

 lb/gal

Products Coating

1)

 Extreme performance

 0.42

 (3.5)

prime coat

 0.42*

 (3.5)*

2)

 Extreme performance top- 0.42

 (3.5)

coat (air dried)

 0.42*

 (35)*

3)

 Final repair coat

 0.42

 (3.5)

(air dried)

 0.42*

 (3.5)*

4)

 All other coatings are subject to the emission

 limitations for miscellaneous metal parts and

products coatings in subsection

(j)

 above.

1)

 Wood Furniture Coating

 kg/l

 lb/gal

1)

 Clear topcoat

 0.67

 (5.6)

0.67*

 (5.6)*

2)

 Opaque stain

 0.56

 (4.7)

0.56*

 (4.7)*

3)

 Pigmented coat

 0.60

 (5.0)

0.60*

 (5.O)*

4)

 Repair coat

 0.67

 (5.6)

0.67*

 (5.6)*

5)

 Sealer

 0.67

 (5.6)

0.67*

 (5.6)*

6)

 Semi-transparent stain

 0.79

 (6.6)

0.79*

 (6.6)*

7)

 Wash coat

 0.73

 (6.1)

0.73*

 (6.1)*

(Note:

 An owner or operator of a wood furniture

coating operation subject to this Section shall

apply all coatings, with the exception of no more

than 37.8

1

 (10 gal)

 of coating per day used for

touch—up and repair operations, using one or more

of the following application systems:

 airless

spray application system, air—assisted airless

spray application system, electrostatic spray

application system, electrostatic bell or disc

spray application system, heated airless spray

application system, roller coating, brush or wipe

coating application system, dip coating

application system or high volume low pressure

 (HVLP)

application system.)

122

~j.

 Plastic Parts Coating:

 Automotive/Transportation

kg/i

 lb/aal

3j

 Interiors

~J.. Baked

j)

 Color coat

 0.49*

 L4.1)*

jJJ

 Primer

 0.46*

 (3.8)*

,~J

 Air Dried

ii.

 Color coat

 0.38*

 (3.2)*

JJJ..

 Primer

 0.42*

 (3.5)*

2~

 Exteriors (flexible

and non—flexible)

~

 Baked

j)..

 Primer

 0.60*

 (5.0)*

ii.L

 Primer non—

 0.54*

 (45)*

flexible

iii)

 Clear coat

 0.52*

 (4.3)*

jyJ

 Color coat

 0.55*

 (4.6)*

~

 Air Dried

fl.

 Primer

 0.66*

 (55)*

Li!

 Clear coat

 0.54*

 (4.5)*

iii)

 Color coat

 0.67*

 (5.6)*

(red

 & black)

~jyj Color coat

(others)

 0.61*

 (5.1)*

~J

 Specialty

~j.

 Vacuum metallizing

 0.66*

 (5.5)*

basecoats. texture

basecoats

~

 Black coatings,

 0.71*

 (59)*

reflective argent

coatings, air

bag cover coatings,

and soft coatings

123

çJ

 Gloss reducers~

 Ø•77*

 (6.4)*

vacuum metallizing

topcoats. and

texture topcoats

Qj

 Stencil coatings,

 0.82*

 (6.8)*

adhesion primers.

ink

~ad coatings,

electrostatic prep

coatings. and resist

coatings

~

 Head lamp lens

 0.89

*

 (7.4)

*

coatings

Plastic Parts Coating:

 Business Machine

kg/l

 lb/gal

~j

 Primer

 0.14*

 (1,2)*

21

 Color coat

 (non-

 0.28*

 (2.3)*

texture coat)

~j.. Color coat (texture

 0.28*

 (2.3)*

coat)

41

 Electromagnetic

 0.48*

 (4.0)*

interference/radio

frecruency interference

(EMI/RFI) shielding coatings

~j

 Specialty Coatings

~J.

 Soft coat

 0.52*

 (4.3)*

~

 Plating resist

 0.71*

 (59)*

QI

 Plating sensitizer

 0.85*

 (7.1)*

(Source:

 Amended at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

__________,

 effective

)

Section 219.205

 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations

No owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations

of Section 219.204 of this PartSubpart and complying by means of

this Section shall operate the subject coating line unless the

owner or operator has demonstrated compliance with subsection

(a),

 (b),

 (c),

 (d),

 (e)1.. e~(f).

 (a). or

 (h) of this Section

(depending upon the category of coating) through the applicable

coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in Section

219.105(a)

 of this Part and the recordkeeping and reporting

requirements specified in Section 219.211(d) of this PartSubpart:

124

a)

 No owner or operator of a coating line subject to only

one of the limitations from among Section

219.204(a)(l),

 (a)(4),

 (c),

 (d),

 (e),

 (f),

 (g),

 (h), or

(i)

 of this PartSubpart shall apply coatings on any

such coating line, during any day, whose daily-weighted

average VON content exceeds the emission limitation to

which the coatings are subject.

b)

 No owner or operator of a miscellaneous metal parts and

products coating line subject to the limitations of

Section 219.204(j)

 of this PartSubpart shall apply

coatings to

 miscellaneous metal parts or products on

 the subject coating line unless the requirements in

subsection

 (b) (1)

or

 (b) (2) of this Section below are

met.

1)

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all of which are subject to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

219.204(j)

 above of this Subpart during the same

day (e.g.,

 all coatings used on the line are

subject to 0.42 kg/i 3.5

 lbs/gal)), the

daily-weighted average VON content shall not

exceed the coating VON content limit corresponding

to the category of coating used,

or

2)

 For each coating line which applies coatings

subject to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 219.204(j) aboveof this

Subpart, during the same day, the owner or

operator shall have a site—specific proposal

approved by the Agency and approved by the USEPA

as a SIP revision.

 To receive approval, the

requirements of USEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy

Statement (and related policy)

 51 Fed. Reg. 43814

(December 4,

 1986), must be satisfied.

C)

 No owner or operator of a can coating line subject to

the limitations of Section 219.204(b) of this

PartSubpart shall operate the subject coating line

using a coating with a VOM content in excess of the

limitations specified in Section 219.204(b) of this

PartSubpart unless all of the following requirements

are met:

1)

 An alternative daily emission limitation for the

can coating operation,

 i.e. for all of the can

coating lines at the source, shall be determined

according to subsection

 (c) (2) belowof this

Section.

 Actual daily emissions shall never

exceed the alternative daily emission limitation

and shall be calculated by use of the following

equation.

125

n

Ed=

where:

Ed

 Actual VON emissions for the day in

units of kg/day

 (lbs/day);

i

 Subscript denoting a specific coating

applied;

n

 Total number of coatings applied in the

can coating operation,

 i.e. all can

coating lines at the source;

 Volume of each coating applied for the

day in units of 1/day (gal/day)

of

coating (minus water and any compounds

which are specifically exempted from the

definition of VOM);

C~

 The VON content of each coating as

applied in units of kg VON/i

 (lbs

VOM/gal)

 of coating

 (minus water and any

compounds which are specifically

exempted from the definition of VOM).

2)

 The alternative daily emission limitation

 (Ad)

shall be determined for the can coating operation,

i.e. for all of the can coating lines at the

source, on a daily basis as follows:

n

E

 L1j~,

-C~1

i=1

(D1

—

L1)

where:

 The VON emissions allowed for the day in

units of kg/day (lbs/day);

i

 Subscript denoting a specific coating

applied;

n

 Total number of surface coatings applied

in the can coating operation;

 The VON content of each surface coating

as applied in units of kg VON/i

 (lbs

VOM/gal)

 of coating (minus water and any

compounds which are specifically

exempted from the definition of VON);

126

 The density of VON in each coating

applied.

 For the purposes of

calculating Ad, the density is

0.882 kg VON/i VON

 (7.36 lbs VON/gal

VON);

 Volume of each surface coating applied

for the day in units of

1

 (gal)

of

coating

 (minus water and any compounds

which are specifically exempted from the

definition of VOM);

 The VOM emission.limitation for each

surface coating applied as specified in

Section 219.204(b)

 of this PartSubpart

in units of kg VON/i

 (lbs VON/gal) of

coating

 (minus water and any compounds

which are specifically exempted from the

definition of VOM).

d)

 No owner or operator of a heavy off—highway vehicle

products coating line subject to the limitations of

Section 219.204(k)

 of this PartSubpart shall apply

coatings to heavy off-highway vehicle products on the

subject coating line unless the requirements of

subsection

 (d) (1) or

 (d) (2)

 bel-owof this Section are

met.

1)

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all of which are subject to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

219.204(k)

 abovcof this Subpart, during the same

day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are

subject to 0.42 kg/1

3.5

 lbs/gal),

the

daily-weighted average VON content shall not

exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding

to the category of coating used,

or

2)

 For each coating line which applies coatings

subject to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 219.204(k) abovcof this

Subpart, during the same day, the owner or

operator shall have a site specific proposal

approved by the Agency and approved by the tJSEPA

as a SIP revision.

 To receive approval, the

 requirements of USEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy

Statement (and related policy)

5.

 Fed. Reg. 43814

(December 4,

 1986), must be satisfied.

e)

 No owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line

subject to the limitations of Section 219.204(1) of

this PartSubpart shall apply coatings to wood furniture

on the subject coating line unless the requirements of

127

subsection

 (e) (1) or subsection

 (e) (2) belowof this

Section,

 in addition to the requirements specified in

the note to Section 219.204(1)

 of this

Partof

this

Subpart, are met.

1)

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all of which are subject to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

219.204(1)

abovcof

 this Subpart,

 during the same

day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are

subject to

0

•

67 kg/i 5.6

 lbs/gal),

the

daily-weighted average VON content shall not

exceed the coating VON content limit corresponding

to the category of coating used, or

2)

 For each coating line which applies coatings

subject to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 219.204(1)

 zibo~eofthis

Subpart, during the same day, the owner or

operator shall have a site specific proposal

approved by the Agency and approved by the USEPA

as a SIP revision.

 To receive approval, the

requirements of USEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy

Statement (and related policy) 51 Fed. Reg. 43814

(December 4,

 1986), must be satisfied.

fl

 No owner or operator of a plastic parts coating line

subiect to the limitations of Section 219.204(m) or

(n)

of this Subpart shall a~~lvcoatings to business

machine or automotive/transportation plastic carts on

the subiect coating line unless the requirements of

subsection

 (f) (1)

or

 (f) (2)

 of this Section are met.

fl..

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all of which are subiect to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

219.204(m) or

 (n) of this Subpart. during the same

daY

 (e.g., all coatings used on the line are

subiect to 0.42 kg/i

 13.5 lbs/cral)), the

daily-weiahted average VON content shall not

exceed the coating VON content limit correspondina

to the cateaorv of coating used, or

21

 For each coating line which applies coatings

subiect to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 219.204(m)

or

 (n) of this

Subpart. during the same day

 the owner or

operator shall have a site specific proposal

approved by the Agency and USEPA as a SIP

revision.

 To receive aPproval. the reauirements

of USEPA’s Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and

related policy) must be satisfied.

128

gl

 No owner or operator

of

a metal furniture coating line

subject to the limitations of Section 219.204(g)

of

this Subpart shall apply coatings on the subiect

coating line unless the requirements of subsection

(g) (1)

or

(g)

 (2) of this Section are met.

fl-

 For each coating line which applies multip1~

coatings, all of which are subiect to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

219.204(g)

 of this Subpart, during the same day

(e

cr..

 all coatings used on the line are subject

to 0.34 kg/i

2.8

 lbs/pall), the dailv—weiahtéd

averacre VOM content shall not exceed the coating

VON content limit corresponding to the cate~orvof

coatina used,

or

21

 For each coating line which applies coatings

sublect to more than one numerical emission

limitation in Section 219.204(cr)

 of this Subpart,

during the same day, the owner or operator shall

have a site specific ~ro~osal approved by the

Agency~andUSEPA as a SIP revision.

 To receive

approval. the requirements of USEPA’s Emissions

Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must

be satisfied.

hi

 No owner or operator of a large appliance coating line

sublect to the limitations of Section 219.204(h) of

this Subpart shall apply coatings on the subiect

coating line unless the requirements of subsection

(h) (1)

or

 (h) (2)

 of this Section are met.

fl..

 For each coating line which applies multiple

coatings, all of which are subiect to the same

numerical emission limitation within Section

219.204(h)

 of this Subpart, during the same day

(e.cr.. all coatings used on the line are subject

to 0.34 kcr/l 2.8

 lbs/gal).

 the daily—weighted

average VON content shall not exceed the coating

VON content limit correspondina to the cate~orvof

coating used. or

21

 For each coating line which ap~1iescoatings

sublect to more than one numerical emission

limitation

 in Section 219.204(h) of this Subpart,

during the same day, the owner or operator shall

have a site specific proposal approved by the

Agency and USEPA as a SIP revision.

 To receive

a~~rovpl,the requirements of USEPA’s Emissions

Trading Policy Statement (and related ~olicv) must

be satisfied.

(Source:

 Amended at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

 , effective

—

129

Section 219.207

 Alternative Emission Limitations

a)

Any

owner or operator of a coating line subject to

Section 219.204 of this ppr-tSubpart may comply with

this Section, rather than with Section 219.204 of this

PartSubpart,

 if a capture system and control device are

operated at all times the coating line is in operation

and the owner or operator demonstrates compliance with

subsection (c),

 (d),

 (e),

 (f),

 (g)... e~ (h).

 (i). or

(1)

of this Section (depending upon the source category)

through the applicable coating analysis and capture

system and control device efficiency test methods and

procedures specified in Section 219.105 of this Part

and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements

specified in Section 219.211(e)

 of this PartSubpart;

and the control device is equipped with the applicable

monitoring equipment specified in Section 219.105(d)

of

this Part and the monitoring equipment is installed,

calibrated, operated and maintained according to vendor

specifications at all times the control device is in

use.

 A capture system and control device, which does

not demonstrate compliance with subsection

 (c),

 (d),

(e),

 (f), (g)~e~(h).

 (i),

 (1), or

 (k) of this Section

may be used as an alternative to compliance with

Section 219.204 of this PartSub~artonly if the

alternative is approved by the Agency and approved by

the USEPA as a SIP revision.

b)

 Alternative Add-On Control Methodologies

1)

 The coating line is equipped with a capture system

and control device that provides 81 percent

reduction in the overall emissions of VON from the

coating line and the control device has a 90

percent efficiency, or

2)

 The system used to control VOM from the coating

line is demonstrated to have an overall efficiency

sufficient to limit VON emissions to no more than

what is allowed under Section 219.204 of this

PartSubpart.

 Use of any control system other than

an afterburner, carbon adsorption, condensation,

or absorption scrubber system can be allowed only

if approved by the Agency and approved by the

USEPA as a SIP revision.

 The use of transfer

efficiency credits can be allowed only if approved

by the Agency and approved by the USEPAas

 a SIP

revision.

 Baseline transfer efficiencies and

transfer efficiency test methods must be approved

by the Agency and the USEPA.

Such overall efficiency is to be determined as

follows:

130

A)

 Obtain the emission limitation from the

appropriate subsection in Section 219.204 of

this PartSubpart;

B)

 Calculate “5” according to the equation in

Section 219.206 of this PartSubpart;

C)

 Calculate the overall efficiency required

according to Section 219.105(e)

 of this Part.

For the purposes of calculating this value,

according to the equation in Section

219.105(e) (2)

 of this Part, VON1 is equal to

the value of “5” as determined above in

subsection

 (b) (2) (B) of this Section.

c)

 No owner or operator of a coating line subject to only

one of the emission limitations from among Section

219.204 (a) (1),

 (a) (4),

(c)

,

(d)

,

(e)

,

(f)

,

(g)

,

 (h) or

(i) of this PartSubpart and equipped with a capture

system and control device shall operate the subject

coating line unless the requirements in subsection

(b) (1)

or

 (b) (2) aboveof this Section are met.

No

owner or operator of a coating line subject to Section

219.204 (a) (2) or

 (a) (3) of this Part and equipped with

a capture system and control device shall operate the

coating line unless the owner or operator demonstrates

compliance with such limitation in accordance with the

topcoat protocol referenced in Section 219.105(b) of

this Part.

d)

 No owner or operator of a miscellaneous metal parts and

products coating line which applies one or more

coatings during the same day, all of which are subject

to the same numerical emission limitation within

Section 219.204(j)

 of this PartSub~art(e.g., all

coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/i (3.5

 lbs/gal),

 and which is equipped with a capture system

and control device shall operate the subject coating

line unless the requirements in subsection

 (b) (1) or

(b) (2) abovcof this Section are met.

e)

 No owner or operator of a heavy off—highway vehicle

products coating line which applies one or more

coatings during the same day, all of which are subject

to the same numerical emission limitation within

Section 219.204(k) of this Subpart (e.g., all coatings

used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/i

 (3.5

lbs/gal),

 and which is equipped with a capture system

and control device shall operate the subject coating

line unless the requirements in subsection

 (b) (1)

or

(b) (2)

 abovcof this Section are met.

f)

 No owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line

which applies one or more coatings during the same day,

131

all of which are subject to the same numerical emission

limitation within Section 219.204(1)

 of this

PartSubpart

 (e.g., all coatings used on the line are

subject to 0.67 kg/i (5.6 lbs/gal),

 and which is

equipped with a capture system and control device shall

operate the subject coating line unless the

requirements in subsection

 (b) (1) or

 (b) (2) of this

Section are met.

 If compliance is achieved by meeting

the requirements in subsection

 (b) (2) of this

PartSection, then the provisions in the note to~Section

219.204(1)

 of this PartSubpart must also be met.

g)

 No owner or operator of a can coating line and equipped

with a capture system and control device shall operate

the subject coating line unless the requirements in

subsection

 (~)-~gj..)

 (1) or -(4~-jg~(2)belowof this Section

are met.

1)

 An alternative daily emission limitation for the

can coating operation,

 i.e.

 for all of the can

coating lines at the source,

 shall be determined

according to Section 219.205(c) (2)

 of this

PartSubpart.

 Actual daily emissions shall never

exceed the alternative daily emission limitation

and shall be calculated by use of the following

equation:

n

E

V1

C1

 (1—F1

)

i=1

where:

Ed

 Actual VON emissions for the day in

units of kg/day

 (lbs/day);

i

 Subscript denoting the specific

coating applied;

n

 Total number of surface coatings as

applied in the can coating

operation;

 Volume of each coating as applied

for the day in units of 1/day

(gal/day)

 of coating

 (minus water

and any compounds which are

specifically exempted from the

definition of VON);

C1

 The VOM content of each coating as

applied in units of kg VON/i (lbs

VON/gal) of coating (minus water

132

and any compounds which are

specifically exempted from the

definition of VON) and

F,

 Fraction, by weight, of VOM

emissions from the surface coating,

reduced or prevented from being

emitted to the ambient air. This is

the overall efficiency of the

capture system and control device.

2)

 The coating line is equipped with a capture system

and control device that provide 75 percent

reduction in the overall emissions of VOM from the

coating line and the control device has a 90

percent efficiency.

~

 No owner or operator of

p

plastic parts coating line

which applies one or more coatings during the same day,

all of which are sublect to the same numerical emission

limitation within Section 219.204(m) or

(n)

 of this

Subpart

 (e.g., all coatings used on the line are

subject to 0.42 k~/l3.5

 lbs/gall), and which is

eauipped with a capture system and control device shall

operate the subiect coating line unless the

requirements in subsection

 (b) (1) or

 (b) (2) of this

Section are met.

jj..

 No owner or operator of a metal furniture coating line

which applies one or more coatings during the same day.

all of which are sublect to the same numerical emission

limitation within Section 219.204(g) of this Subpart

(e.g..

all

coatjn~s

used

the

line

are

subiect

0.34

kcr/l

2.8

lbs/gal)),

and

which

equi~~edwith

capture system and control device shall operate the

subject coating line unless the requirements in

subsection

 (b) (1) or

 (b) (2) of this Section are met.

jj

 No owner or operator of a large appliance coating line

which ap~1iesone or more coatings during the same day.

all of which are subiect to the same numerical emission

limitation within Section 219.204(h) of this Subpart

(e.g.. all coatings used on the line are subiect to

0.34 k~/l 2.8

 lbs/gall), and which is eguipped with a

capture system and control device shall operate the

subject

coating

line

unless

the

requirements

subsection

 (b) (1)

or

 (b) (2) of this Section are met.

(Source:

 Amended at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

 , effective —

_______________________________________________________ )

Section 219.208

 Exemptions From Emission Limitations

133

Exemptions

for

 all coating categories except wood

furniture

coating.

The

limitations

this

Subpart

shall

not

apply

coating

 lines within a source, that

otherwise would be

subject

the

same

subsection

Section

219.204

 (because they belong to the same

coating

category,

e.g.

can

coating),

provided

that

combined

actual

emissions

VON

from

all

lines

the

source

subject

that

subsection

never

exceed

6.8

kg/day

 (15 lbs/day) before the application of capture

systems

and

control

devices.

(For

example,

can

coating

lines

within

source

would

not

subject

the

limitations

Section

219.204(b)

this

PartSub~art

if the combined actual emissions of VON from the can

 coating lines never exceed 6.8 kg/day

 (15 lbs/day)

before the application of capture systems and control

devices.)

 Volatile organic material emissions from

heavy

off-highway vehicle products coating lines must

combined

with

VON

emissions

from

miscellaneous

metal

parts

and. products

coating

lines

determine

applicability.

Any

owner

operator

coating

source

shall

comply

with

the

applicable

coating

analysis

test

methods

and

procedures

specified

Section

219.105(a)

this

Part

and

the

recordkeeping

and

reporting

requirements

specified

Section

219.211(a)

 of this PartSubpart if total VON emissions

from

the

subject

coating

lines

 are always less than or

equal

6.8

kg/day

(15

lbs/day)

before

the

application

capture

systems

and

control

devices

and,

therefore,

are

not

subject

the

limitations

Section

219.204

this

PartSubpart.

Once

category

coating

lines

source

subject

the

limitations

Section

219.204T

this

Part

the

coating

lines

are

always

subject

the

limitations

Section

219.204

this

Part Subpart

Applicability

for

wood

furniture

coating

 The limitations of this Subpart shall apply to a

source’s wood furniture coating lines if the

source

contains

process

emission

units,

not

regulated

Subparts

(excluding

Section

219.204(1)

this

PartSubpart),

(excluding

Section

219.405

this

Part),

(excluding

Section

219.486

this

Part),

this

Part,

which

group

both:

Have

maximum

theoretical

emissions

(100

tons)

per

calendar

year

VON

air

pollution

control

equipment

were

used,

and

Are

not

limited

less

than

(100

tons)

VOM

per

calendar

year

air

pollution

control equipment were used, through

134

production or capacity limitations contained

in a federally

enforceable

permit

SIP

revision.

21

The

limitations

this

Subpart

shall

 a~Plyto a

source’s

wood furniture coating lines, on and

alter March 15, 1996.

 if the source contains

process emission units. which as a group. have a

potential to emit 22.7 Mg

 (25 tons)

 or more of VOM

per calendar year and have not limited emissions

 to less than 22.7 Mg (25 tons)

 of VON per calendar

year through production or capacity limitations

contained in a federally enforceable operating

Permit or as a SIP revision, and which:

~j

 Are not recrulated by Subparts B,

 E, F

(excluding Section 219.204(1) of this

Subpart). H.

0,

R,

 S, T

 (excluding Section

219,486

of this Part),

V,

X,

1,

 Z or BB of

this

Part;

and

~

 Are not

included in any

the

following

categories:

synthetic

organic

chemical

manufacturing industry

(SOCMI)

 distillation,

SOCNI

reactors,

plastic

Parts

coating

(business

machinesL

plastic

parts

coating

(other),

offset

litho~raphv,

industrial

wastewater,

autobody

refinishing,

SOCMI

batch

processing. volatile organic liquid storacre

tanks and clean—up solvents operations.

~)

 If a

source

ceases

fulfill

the

criteria

subsection~ (b) (1)

or

 (b) (2) of this Section, the

limitations of Section 219.204(1) of this

 PartSubpart shall continue to apply to any wood

furniture coating line which

was

ever

subject

the limitations of Section 219.204(1)

 of this

PartSubpart.

~4)

For

the

purposes

subsection

(b)

this

Section, an

emission

unit

shall

considered

regulated

 a Subpart if it is

subject

 to the

limitations of that Subpart.

 An emission unit is

not considered regulated by a Subpart if it is not

subject to the limits of that Subpart,

 e.g., the

emission unit is covered by an exemption in the

Subpart or the applicability criteria of the

Subpart are not met.

4.~)

 Any owner

or operator of a wood furniture coating

line to which the limitations of this Subpart are

not applicable due to the criteria in subsection

(b)

 of this Section shall, upon request by the

Agency or the USEPA,

 submit records to the Agency

and

thE

USEPA

within

caiendar

days

from

the

aate

 the request that document tnat the coating

 line

is

 excitpt

 ftoin the limitations of this

Subpart.

c_j_

this.

S~ubp~r~

nc~

~

 b’~?~

~

by

subsections

‘219

204th)

~fi~

~f

~

~‘

~ct

~~_1P~CE’-iae~c.

cfc~c~

coat

i~gs

 used

 d.oe.~~ot

ci

J~iicrt.3_j!er

 c:~ht-hcur

pcrod

r~r e~ceed

209

i(ra1Jy~~o3-

~

rdH2flc

t~e1v~ !nonth

period

I ccs~

~l~Q

touc~-Lp

argi

repair

~oatjngs

j~,econ~j~tpnt

with

Section

219.211(b)~4)

of~thts

~

 th~c~nercr- op~ratbr:of: a

~catiJ~gra

crou~

of

coating

~ ine.s

uzing~ toucth-i~.

~hd

gs~t1~t

ar~

~

 fr~ti~J ii~~Z

 ~dJ~

~

 (a) ~

~:~:

)::::d.(~~jf

~hi~

 1i~cE~1~___

~çt~on

2~

208

~c)

-~h~s S~~thaI1

~

 ~J1~cta~~eccrd

 the name.; ~dentificatjon

____

 t~cb-~p

and

~paar

coating1

 a1i~d

i

 each c~t~~:a

~nc

Q_~ioi~period

and

per

~nonth

~

 ~rforipcaIculatjcn.~

 on .a ~ily.basis1.

and

~jp.tajnat

 t~e~ource-records.of

 such

~j.cul~tacns~f_theca

vc

.rn~e of touch-uc

~~ji~r

 cpatings us~d

4~1

r?-1’t-_~-,.,-,.......-.

 .-~.-.-......~

..:

PerfDrincacuatSon~

~

~ioflthIV:

~

ma~intajn

athe

 ~-ourc-e-

rec~rd~s

~f

c~-cp3ations~h~çQ3~fl~d:

~

a~pd-

used~..source-~ide.;~:--for-:

---~onth

erolling

t~e1v.e

month

i~eraod~

Prepare

ar’d

~ta~ntain

 the source

-an

annual

~

of’

the

ir~fcrmataon

 recuar-ed to

ccn~xipiled

p~~j~t

~

this

 Sectaon o~or before

 JanUary

of

the

~

~

three Years all records

 r.eauired

 to b-~

kept und~

~~~beectior~

and

~nake

such

 reccrd~avaLLable to

..‘.

--w--.--.’.......-.-

~

 Notaf~.

tne 2~c~ce~cv

.i~

 t~na~f the use of touch~

.~v~

re

 catang~

 -at:

the source ever e~cee~d~

~~clu~ne

 o.9s

 c~-aart’ ~r

 eight—hour ~eraO~

136

~~ceecs

 2~91/yr

f55

~1/yr~

~or

any roiling

z:welve

month

nerlod withIn

 days ai~ter

any

SUCh

~

~cp~ of a~ny

records

 of such e~ce~dance

 ~ arid

~S.

~

~yer

 minor

soratches and nicks that occur durIng

(Source:

 Amended at

_____

 Ill.

 Req.

__________,

effective

Section

 219.210

Compliance

Section

Every

owner

Operator

coating

line

(of

type

included

within Section 219.204

 of this P~rtSubpart)

shall

comply

with

the

requirements

 of Section 219.204,

 219.205,

 219.207

 or 219.208 and

section 219.211 e—Pa~Sections

 239.212

 and 219.213

of

this Subu~~in accordance with the appropriate

 compliance

schedule

 specified

 in subsection

 (a),

 (b),

 (c)~e~ (ci)

(e)

below:

a)

 No owner or operator of

 a coating line which

 is e~empt

from

the

limitations

Section

219.204

this

Pc~rt

~p~t

because

the

criteria

Section

219.208(a)

this

~ar-t

Subpart

shall

operate

said

coating

line

after

date

consistent

with

Section

219.106

this

part,

unless

the

owner

operator

has

complied

with,

and

continues

comply

with,

Section

219.211(b)

this

Par-t

Subpart.

Wood

furniture

coating

lines

are

not

subject

Section

219.211(b)

this

Part

Subpart.

b)

 No owner or operator of

 a coating line complying by

means

Section

219.204

this

Part

Subpart

shall

operate

said

coating

line

after

date

consistent

with

Section

219.106

this

Part,

unless

the

owner

operator has complied with,

 and continues

 to comply

with, Sections 219.204 and 219.211(c)

 of this Part

Suboart.

owner

operator

coating

line

complying

means

Section

219.205

this

Part

Subpart

shall

operate said coating line on or after

 a date consistent

with

Section

219.106

this

Part,

 unless the owner or

operator

has

complied

with,

and

continues

comply

with,

Sections

219.205

and

219.211(d)

this

Part

Subpax~.

ci)

 owner or operator of

 a coating

 line complying by

means

Section

219.207

this

Part

Suboart

shall

operate

said

coating

line

after

date

consistent

with

Section

219.106

this

Part,

unless

the

owner

operator

has

complied

with,

and

continues

comply

137

with, Sections 219.207 and 219.211(e) of this Part

Subpart.

~

 No owner or operator of a coating line subiect to one

or more of the emission limitations contained in

Section 219.204 of this Subpart on or after March

15,

1996. choosing to comply by means of Section 219.204,

219.205 or 219.207 of this Subpart.

 shall operate said

coating line on or after March 15,

 1996, unless the

owner

 or operator complies with and continues to comply

with, respectively, the applicable requirements in

Section 219.204. or the alternative control options in

Sections 219.205 or 219.207 and the recruirements of

Section 219.211.

~j

 No owner or operator of a coating line subject to one

or more of the emission limitations contained in

Section 219.204 of this Subpart on or after March 15,

1996,

 choosing to com~1yby means of Section 219.212 of

this Subpart,

 shall operate said coating line on or

after March 15,

 1996, unless the owner or operator

complies with and continues to comply with the

requirements of Sections 219.212 and 219.213 of this

Subpart.

(Source:

 Amended at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

 effective

—

___________________________________________________________ )

ection 219.212

 Cross-Line Averaging to Establish Compliance

for Coating Lines

~j..

On and after March 15,

 1996.

 any owner or operator of a

coating line subiect to the limitations set forth in

Section 219.204 of this Subpart. and with coating lines

in operation prior to January 1,

 1991 (“pre-existing

coating lines”). may. for pre-existing coating lines

only.

 elect to comely with the recruirements of this

Section, rather than complyina with the applicable

emission limitations set forth in Section 219.204.

if

an operational change of the

tv~e

described below has

been made after January

 1. 1991,

 to one or more pre-

existing coating lines at the source.

 An operational

change occurs when a pre—existing coatina line is

replaced with a line using lower VOM coating for the

same purpose as the replaced line (“replacement line”).

A source electing to rely on this Section to

demonstrate compliance with the reauirements of this

Subpart shall operate pursuant to federally enforceable

permit conditions approved by the Agency and USEPA.

~

 An owner or operator of pre—existing coating lines

subject to a VOM content limitation

 in Section 219.204

of this Subpart and electing to rely on this Section to

demonstrate compliance with this Subpart must

138

establish.

use

the

ecuations

 subsection

 (ci)

of

~

Section,

 that the calculated actual daily

VQ~

emi~~ons~9

~_p

çipstjng

co~.t

pg

~

~

d~f~edbelow~

are

less

than

c~lcp~1at~

~

~U~wable

 ~QM~

i~ipn~

from the

 coating

~

 For ~nypre-existing

~g~g

 cated for the purposes of ~

 .2.l~~

219.233,

or

219.214

this

Subpart

(“participatina

co~~flg~lines”~

the

source

must

All

coatings

applied

the

particjpating

coating

line

shall,

all

times,

have

VON

content

less

~an

egpal

the

 ap2licable VON content

2imitation

for

such

coating

listed

Appendix

p

 is Parts

and

 P~~e

date the source

 elects

~

Section to demonstrate co~p1iance

~,,

is

~bpart~

all

coatings

applied

the

partic~patipg

poating

line

are

not

already

compliance

with

the VOM content

 limitation for such coating

effective

after

March

15,

1996;

the

p~~jcipating

coating

line

replacement

line,

asd

efined

subse ction

(a.)

this

Section

with

operational

change

occurring

after

~nuary

1991.

pj

 ~d-~

_____

____

limitations set forth in ~

204

~i~part_and

eJ~ç~ang to

rely

this

Section

thas

subpart,

may

also

~n~ge as a~p~-3c1

~

003

t

~flc

 Ia~e.

un~t.L

 December

~~flt

line:

~

of j~

.-~.

_______

___

Thi~i~acement

 line’ is

~

coating iine.~

~

The

~~eD1aceref’~

lane

was

 aaded

after

July 1~

19B8~

~i

~

9~T

..~.

~..

.,_

..-,.-.

 ..-,-

..~

.~.

..-

-~

.r’.~

lines

that satisfy the

c~iteriaof a

rep1~cement

as

 decor

i

,..~,,.,..:.

“.

.-.

~

 gg~p~i~r1ce

Wth

:c.bi.~

Q~Q~rn~

~

shall

ablis

the

 following:

j.)

 An alternative daily emission limitation shall be

determined

for

all

partjcj,patjnc

coating

lines

ccording

,,~~s~egtiq

 ~(2)of

 UI1~S

139

Section,__~i~.~á~:~~~i~:~t~~~

factored

jr~each

th~y

to demonstrate

coi1nlD11ance.~

Provided

co~ml~nce

establi~hed

r~uant

the

~

 1r~mentsan this subs-ect

1or~,

nothin~’

a~ this

~Ction~equi~s

daily

operation

e~e:b

_____

d~JIy

ssIons

from

all oarticipating coating

 lines

 (Ed)

shall

never

exceed

the

alternative

daily

emission

limitation

j~J

and

shall

calculated

by

use

the

~ow1ng

 equation:

n

Ed

~

Cj

il

where:

 Actual daily VON emissions from

participating

p~ting

lines

units

kg/day

(lbs/day)

1,f~

.~iibscriot

denoting

specific

coating

applied

fl,~ Total

nui~ber

 of coatings applied by all

P~iUcipating

coating

lines

the

source

~

 Volume

each

coating

applied

for

the

day

,UDJt~s of

1/day

(gal/day)

coating

(minus

~ter

and

any

compounds

which

are

~p~cifically

exempted

from

the

definition

VOM);

and

Th~YOM content

each

coating

 applied in

,Pnits of ka VON/l

 (lbs VON/gal)

 of coating

iminus

water

and

any

compounds

which

are

,~p~cifical1y

exempted

from

the

definition

21

Th~

alternative

daily

emission

limitation

(Adi

.~h~ll

determined

for

all

participating

coating

lines

the

source

daily

basis

follows:

~

A1

+

where

and~are

defined

subsections

(2)

(A)

.~pg,

~2)

L~J,p~t is

s

j~j

The

portion

the

alternative

 daily

emissions

limitation

 for coating operations

 source using non—oowder coating LA~1

shall

determined

for

all

such

p.~rticjoatjna

non—powder

coating

lines

daily

basis

 follows:

140

n

E

 V1L~

(D1-C~

i=1

 (D1 —

L1)

where:

 The VON emissions allowed for the day in

units of kg/day

 (lbs/day);

i—

 Subscript denoting a specific coating

applied;

n=

 Total number of coatings applied in the

participating coating lines

~

The

VON content of each coating as

applied in units of kg VOM/1

 (lbs

VON/gal) of coating (minus water and any

compounds which are specifically

exempted from the definition of VON)

fl~ The density of VOM in each coating

applied.

 For the purposes of

calculating A1. the density is 0.882 kg

VOM/l VON

 (7.36 lbs VOM/cral VON)

Volume

 of each coating applied for the

daY in units of

1

 (gal)

 of coating

(minus water and any compounds which are

specifically exempted from the

definition of VON); and

~

 The VON emission limitation for each

coating applied, as specified in Section

219.204 of this Subpart. in units of ka

VOM/l

 (lbs VON/gal) of coating

 (minus

water and any compounds which are

specifically exempted from the

definition of VON).

flj..

 The portion of the alternative daily emission

limitation for coating operations at a source

using_powdered coating (A~sha.l be

determined for all such Participating powder

coating lines at the source on a daily basis

as follows:

m

n

E

~

 L~D~

Kb

h=1 j=1

 (D~ -

where:

141

The VON emissions allowed for the day in

units of ka/dav (lbs/day)

h=

 Subscript denoting a specific powder

coating line

j~

 Subscript denoting a specific powder

coating applied;

m=

 Total number of participating powder

coating lines;

n=

 Total number of powder coatings applied

in the participating coating lines;

The assumed density of VON in liquid

coating,

 0.882 kg VON/l VON (7.36 lbs

V0M/~alVON);

Volume of each powder coating consumed

for the day in units of

1

 (gal)

of

coating

~

 The VON emission limitation for each

 coating applied, as specified in Section

219.204 of this Subpart, in units of kg

VOM/l

 (lbs VON/gal)

 of coating (minus

water and any compounds which are

specifically exempted from the

definition of VON): and

K=

 A constant for each individual coating

line representing the ratio of the

volume of coating solids consumed on the

liauid coating system which has been

replaced to the volume of powder coating

consumed on the replacement line to

accomplish the same coating lob.

 This

value shall be determined by the source

based on tests conducted and records

maintained pursuant to the requirements

of Section 219.213 of this Subpart

demonstrating the amount of coating

solids consumed as both liquid and

powder.

 Tests methods and recordkeeping

reauirements shall be a~~rovedby the

Agency and USEPA and contained in the

source’s operating permit as federally

enforceable permit conditions, subiect

to the following restrictions:

ii

 K cannot exceed 0.9 for non—

recycled powder coating systems; or

142

jjj

 K cannot exceed 2.0 for recycled

powder coating systems.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

 effective

_________________________________________________________)

Section 219.213

 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Cross-Line

Averaq~ingParticipating Coating Lines

Any

owner

or operator of a coating line that elects to comply by

means_of_Section 219.212 of this Subpart shall establish the

following:

~j

By

the date consistent with Section

219.210(f)

 of this

Subpart, or upon initial start—up of a new coating line

replacing a pre—existing coating line,

 as defined in

Section 219.212 of this Subpart, or upon changing the

method of compliance for a pre—existing coating line

from the requirements of Section 219.204 or Section

219.207 of this Subpart to the requirements of Section

219.212 of this Subpart, the owner or operator of the

source shall certify to the Agency that each

participating coating line,

 as determined in Section

219.212 of this Subpart, will be in compliance with

Section 219.212 of this Subpart on and after a date

consistent with Section 219.210(f) of this Subpart, or

on and after the initial start-up date of such

participating coating lines.

 Such certification shall

also include:

jj,.

 The name and identification number of each

participating coating line

21

 The name and identification number of each coating

as applied on each participating coating line:

,~j

 The weight of VON per volume of each coating and

the_volume of each coating (minus water and any

compounds which are specifically exempted from the

definition of VON) as applied each day on each

participating coating line;

j~

 The instrument or method by which the owner or

operator will accurately measure or calculate the

volume

 of each coating as applied each day on each

~articipating

 coating line

~

 The method by which the owner or operator will

create and maintain records each day as required

in subsection

(b)

 of this Section;

 example of the format in which the records

required in subsection

(b)

 of this Section will be

kept

143

jj.

 A statement that all coatings used on

participating coating lines have a VON content

less than or

eaual

 to the applicable VON

limitation for such coating set forth in Appendix

H of this Part,

 and that all lines either

~J.

 Underwent a chance in o~erations

incorporating a lower VON coating on each

applicable participating coating line after

the date of January

 1, 1991;

or

~j

Are

 not in compliance and continued

compliance with the coating limitations in

Section 219.204 of this Subpart, compliance

with which is required on or after March 15,

1996.

,~J

 The method by which the owner or operator has

calculated K. for the equation contained in

Section 219.212(~)

~

 of this Subpart,

if

applicable.

~

 On and after a date consistent with Section 219.210(f)

of this Subpart, or on and after the initial start-up

date, the

owner

or operator of a source electing to

com~lvwith the reguirements of this Subpart by means

of Section 219.212 of this Subpart shall collect and

record the following information on a daily basis for

each participating coating line and.maintain the

information at the source for a period of three years:

fl

 The name and identification number of each coating

as applied on each participating coating line

21

 The weight of VON per volume and the volume of

each coating

 (minus water and any compounds which

are specifically exempted from the definition of

VON)

 as applied on each participating coating line

on a daily basis; and

,~j.

 The daily weighted average VON content of all

coatings as applied on each coating line as

defined at 35 Ill.

Adm.

 Code 211.1230.

~j

 On and after a date consistent with Section 219.210(f)

of this Subpart, the owner or operator of participating

coating lines shall:

j~j

 Notify the Agency within 30 days following an

occurrence of a violation of Section 219.212 of

this Subpart; and

144

21

 Send to the Agency any record showing a violation

of Section 219.212 of this Subpart within 30 days

following the occurrence of a violation.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

 effective

_________________________________________________________)

Section

 219.214

 Changing Compliance Methods

~

 At least 30 calendar days before chanaing the method of

compliance with this Subpart from Section 219.212 of

this Subpart to Section 219.204 or Section 219.207 of

this Subpart, the owner or operator of a source relying

on Section 219.212 to demonstrate compliance with this

Subpart for one or more pre—existing coating lines

shall comply with all requirements of Section 219.211

(c) (1) or

 (e) (1)

 of this Subpart, res~ective1y.

~

 Upon changing the method of compliance with this

Subpart from Section 219.212 to Section 219.204 or

Section 219.207 of this Subpart. the owner or operator

of a source shall comply with the requirements of

Section 219.211

 (c) or

(e)

 of this Subpart.

respectively.

~j

 The owner or operator shall certify that all remaining

participating coating lines,

 if any, comply and

continue

comply

with

the

requirements

Section

219.212

 of this Subpart.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

effective

—

)

SUBPART Q:

LEAKS

FRON

 SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CHEMICAL

AND

POLYMER

MANUFACTURING

PLANT

Section

 219.431

 Applicability

The

thisSub~a.rt

Shall

apply

every

own

èr

O~ator

any_chemical

 manufacturing process unit that

manufactures,

 primary product, one or more of the

chemicals listed in Appendix A of this Part and that

chemical manufacturing process unit causes or allows

any reactor or distillation unit,

 either individually

or in tandem, to discharge one or more process vent

streams either directly to the atmosphere or to a

recovery system.

~

 Notwithstanding subsection

(a)

 of this Section. the

control requirements set forth within Section 219.432

of this Subpart shall not apply to the following:

145

fl

An~process

vent

stream

with

total

resource

effectiveness

(TRE)

index

value

greater

than

1.0.

However,

such

process

vent

stream

 remains sublect

the

performance

testing

 requirements contained

Section

219.433

this

Subpart

and

the

reporting

and

recordkeeping

requirements

contained

Section

219.435

this

 Subpart

21

An~reactor

 distillation unit that is designed

and

operated

 batch operation

21

Any

reactor

distillation

unit

that

part

polymer

manufacturing

operation;

Any

reactor

 distillation unit that is part of

the chemical manufacturing process unit with a

total design capacity of less than

 1 gigagram

(1.100

tons)

per

year

for

all

chemicals

produced.

as a primary product, within that process unit.

 However, such operations remain sublect to the

reporting

and

recordkeeping

requirements

contained

Section

219.435(d)

this

Subpart;

~J

Any

vent stream with a flow rate less than 0.0085

scm/mm

total

VON

concentration,

less

methane

or ethane. of less than 500 p~mvas measured by

Method 18 or a concentration of VON of less than

250 ppmv as measured by Method 25A.

 However, such

operations remain subject to the performance

testing requirement listed in Section 219.433 of

this Subpart. as well as the reporting and

recordkee~ingrequirements contained in Section

219.435 of this Subpart.

~j.

 An~reactor or distillation unit included within

an Early Reduction Program. as specified in 40 CFR

63. and published in ~

 Fed. Reg. 61970

 (October

22.

 1993).

evidenced

timely

enforceable

commitment approved by USEPA.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

effective

—

_________________________________________________________)

Section 219.432

 Control Requirements

~1

 Every owner or operator of a source subject to the

requirements of this Subpart, as determined by Section

219.431 of this Subpart,

 shall either:

fl

Reduce

emissions

VON,

 less methane or ethane,

by 98 weight—percent. or to 20 ppmv, on a dry

basis, corrected to 3 percent oxygen, whichever is

less stringent

146

21

 If a boiler or process heater is used to comply

with this

Subpart,

the

vent

stream

shall

introduced into the flame zone of the boiler or

process heater: or

21

flare

used

comply

with

this

Subpart

shall

comply

with

the

requirements

CFR

60.18.

incorporated

 by reference at Section

219.112

this

Part.

The

flare

operation

requirements of

CFR

60.18

not

apply

process, not sub-iect to this Subpart, vents an

emergency

relief

discharge

into

common

flare

 header and causes the flare servicing the process

subject to this Subpart to not comply with one or

the

provisions

CFR

60.18.

Notwithstanding

subsection

(a)

(C)

of

this

Section,

and

subject

subsection

(b) (2)

this

Section:

fl

 No owner or operator of a source

 sub-iect to

Section 219.432 of this Subpart shall cause or

allow VON to be emitted through an existing

control device unless the control device is

operated to achieve:

~j

 90 percent control of the VON emissions

vented to it; or

~j

 VON emissions concentration of less than 50

ppmv.

 on a dry basis.

Any

existing control device

 sub-iect to subsection

(a) of this Section is required to meet the 98

percent emissions limit set forth

 in subsection

(a) (1) upon the earlier to occur of the date the

control device is replaced for any reason.

including, but not limited to, normal maintenance,

malfunction,

 accident,

 and obsolescence, or

December 31.

 1999.

 A control device is considered

replaced

when:

Al

 All of the device is replaced; or

~j

 When

the

cost

repair

the

device

the

cost to replace part of the device exceeds 50

percent of the cost of replacing the entire

device with a device that complies with the

98

 emissions limitation in subsection

 (a) (1)

of this Section.

~j

For

each

individual

vent

stream

within

chemical

manufacturing

process

unit

with

TRE

index

value

greater than 1.0. the owner or operator shall maintain

process vent stream parameters that retain a calculated

147

TRE index value greater than 1.0 by means of recovery.

Any recovery device shall have as its primary purpose

the capture of chemicals for use, reuse, or sale.

The

TRE index value shall be calculated at the outlet of

the final recovery device.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

__________,

 effective —

_________________________________________________________)

Section 219.433

 Performance and Testing Requirements

~

 For the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the

TRE index value in Section 219.432(c)

 of this Subpart,

an engineering assessment shall be made to determine

process vent stream flow rate, net heating value, and

VON emission rate for the representative operating

conditions expected to yield the lowest TRE index

value.

 The source shall also calculate the TRE index

values

pursuant

the

equations

contained

within

appendix

(b)

(1)

this

Part.

jj

 If the TRE index value calculated using such

engineering assessment and the TRE equation in

Appendix G

 (b) (1) of this Part is greater than

4.0, then the owner or operator is exempt from

p~rformingthe measurements specified in Appendix

G

(a)

 of this Part.

21

the

 TRE index value calculated using such

engineering assessment and the TRE equation in

Appendix G

 (b) (1) of this Part is less than or

equal to 40, then the owner or operator shall

perform the measurements specified in Appendix

G(a) of this Part.

 An owner or operator of a

source may, in the alternative, elect to comply

with the control requirements specified in Section

219.432 of this Subpart rather than performing the

measurements in Appendix G(a) of this Part.

fl

 An engineering assessment shall include,

 but is

not

limited

to.

the

following:

 Previous test results, provided the tests are

representative of current operating practices

at the chemical manufacturing process unit

 Bench-scale or pilot—scale test data of the

process under representative operating

conditions

~j

 Maximum

flow rate,

 as stated within a permit

limit.

applicable

the

process

vent

148

QJ

 Design analysis based on accepted chemical

engineering principles. measurable process

p~ameters, or physical or chemical laws or

properties.

 Examples of analytical methods

include,

but

are

not

limited

to.

the

following:

j)

 Use of material balances based on

process stoichiometry to estimate

maximum VOM concentrations;

jJJ

Estimation

maximum

flow

rate

based

physical equipment design such as pump

or blower capacities;

iii) Estimation of VOM concentrations based

on saturation conditions; and

jy).

 Estimation of maximum expected net

heating

value

based

the

stream

concentration of each organic compound,

or. alternatively,

 as if all VON in the

stream

were

the

compound

with

the

highest heating value.

~j

 All data,

 assumptions, and procedures used in the

engineering assessment shall be documented.

~

 For the puriDose of demonstrating compliance with the

control requirements in Section 219.432 of this

Subpart, the chemical manufacturing process unit shall

be run at representative operating conditions and flow

rates during any performance test.

gj

 The following methods in 40 CFR 60. incorporated by

reference at Section 219.112 of this Part,

 shall be

used to demonstrate compliance with the reduction

efficiency requirement listed in Section 219.432(a) (1)

of this Subpart.

fl

 Method

 1 or 1A, incorporated by reference at

Section 219.112 of this Part,

 as a~~ropriate.for

selection of the sampling sites.

 The control

device inlet sampling site for determination of

vent stream molar composition or VON content,

 less

methane and ethane. reduction efficiency shall be

located after the last recovery device but prior

to the inlet of the control device, prior to any

dilution of the process vent stream, and prior to

release to the atmosphere.

2.1

 Nethod

2.

 2A, 2C, or 2D,

 incorporated by reference

at Section 219.112 of this Part,

 as appropriate,

149

for

determination

gas

stream

volumetric

flow

rate.

31

The

emission

rate

correction

factor.

integrated

sampling, and analysis procedure of Method

3.

incorporated

reference

Section

219.112

this

Part,

shall

used

determine

the

oxygen

concentration (O~1 for the purpose of determining

compliance with the 20 ppmv limitation.

The

sampling

site

for

determining

compliance

with

the

20 ppmv limitation shall be the same site used for

the VON samples, and samples shall be taken at the

same_time_that the VON samples are taken.

 The VON

concentration corrected to

 3 percent oxygen (C~j

shall be computed using the following formula:

~VOM

 17.9

20.9

— O2d

where:

Concentration

VOM

(minus

methane

and ethane)

 corrected to

 3 percent

Q~dry basis,

 ppmv.

~VOM

 Concentration of VON (minus methane

and ethane)

 dry basis, ppmv

 Concentration of oxygen, dry basis,

percent by volume.

.4j

 Method 18. incorporated by reference at Section

219.112 of this Part, to determine the

concentration of VON,

 less methane and ethane, at

the outlet of the control device when determining

compliance with the 20 ppmv limitation in Section

219.432(a) (1)

 of this Subpart, or at both the

control

device

inlet

and

outlet

when

the

reduction

efficiency of the control device is to be

determined.

The

minimum

sampling

time

 for each run shall

be_1_hour in which either an integrated

sample or four grab samples shall be taken.

If grab sampling is used then the samples

shall be taken at 15-minute intervals.

.~j.

 The emission reduction

 (R) of VON, less

methane and ethane. shall be determined using

the

following

formula:

(E1

—~j

___________

100

150

where:

R

 Emission reduction, percent by

weight.

Mass rate of VON

 (minus methane and

ethane) entering the control

device, kg VON/hr.

 Mass rate of VON,

 less methane and

ethane discharged to the

atmosphere, kg VON/hr.

Q1

 The mass rates of VON (E1,~) shall be

computed using the following formula:

n

~

 (E C~~)

0,

i~!

n

E~ K2

 (E C4&~)

1=1

where:

C~,C~

 Concentration of sample

component

“1”

 of the gas

stream at the inlet and outlet

the

control

device,

respectively. dry basis, ppmv.

 Molecular weight of sample

component

“i”

of the gas

stream at the inlet and outlet

of the control device,

respectively, grams per

gram—mole.

___

Flow

rate

gas

stream

the

inlet

and

outlet

the

control

device,

respectively.

dry scm/mm.

2.494 x 10~(liters per

minute) (gram—mole per

scm)

(~g/g)

(min/hr), where

 standard temperature for

(gram—mole per scm)

 is 20°C.

151

Qj

 The representative VON concentration

 (CVoMI

is the sum of each of the individual

components of VON

 (C-i)

 and shall be computed

for

each

run

using

the

following:

n

~VOM

where:

cVOM

 Concentration of VON (minus methane

and ethane). dry basis,

 Ppmv.

 Concentration of sample component

“1”.

 dry basis, ~pmv.

Number

components

the

sample.

~j

 When a

boiler

process

 heater with a design heat

input

capacity

megawatts

greater,

boiler

process

heater

into

which

the

process

vent

stream

introduced

with

the

primary

fuel,

is used to comply with the control requirements.

initial

performance

test

not

required.

~j

 When a flare

 is used to comply with the control

requirements of this rule, the flare shall comply with

the

requirements

CFR

60.18.

incorporated

reference

Section

219.112

this

Part.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

effective

—

______________________________________________________________)

Section 219.434

 Monitoring Requirements

~j

 The owner or operator of a source subiect to the

control

requirements

Section

219.432

this

Subpart

that

uses

incinerator

comply

with

the

VON

emission

limitation

specified

Section

219.432

(a)(1i

shall

install,

calibrate,

maintain,

and

operate,

according

manufacturer’s

specifications,

temperature monitoring device egui~pedwith a

continuous recorder and having an accuracy of ±1

percent

the

temperature

measured

expressed

degrees

Celsius,

±0.5°C, whichever

greater.

JJ

 Where

an incinerator other than a catalytic

incinerator

used,

temperature

monitoring

device

shall

installed

the

firebox.

21

Where

 a catalytic incinerator is used, temperature

monitoring

devices

shall

installed

the

gas

152

stream

immediately

before

and

after

the

catalyst

bed.

The

owner

operator

source

that

uses

flare

comply

with

Section

219.432

(a)

(2)

this

Subpart

shall

install,

calibrate,

maintain,

and

operate,

according

manufacturer’s

specifications,

heat—sensing

device.

such

ultraviolet

beam

sensor

thermocouple,

the

pilot

light

indicate

continuous

presence

flame.

The

owner

operator

source

that

uses

boiler

process

heater

with

design

heat

input

capacity

less

than

megawatts

comply

with

Section

219.432(a)

(1)

this

Subpart

 shall install, calibrate, maintain, and

operate,

according

the

manufacturer’s

specifications,

temperature

 monitoring device in the

firebox.

The

monitoring

device

 shall be equipped with

continuous

recorder

with

 accuracy of

±1 percent

the

temperature

being

measured

expressed

degrees

Celsius

±0.5°C,whichever

greater.

Any

boiler

process heater in which all vent streams are introduced

with primary fuel is exempt from this requirement.

~fl

 The owner or operator of a process vent with a TRE

index value of 4.0 or less that uses one or more

product recovery devices shall install either an

organic monitoring device equipped with a continuous

recorder

the

 monitoring equipment specified in

subsections

(d)(1).

(d)(2),

(d)(3).

(d)(4)

this

Section,

depending

the

type

 recovery device used.

All

monitoring

equipment

shall

installed.

calibrated,

and

 maintained according to the

manufacturer’s

specifications.

Where

absorber

the

final

recovery

 device in

the

recovery

system,

scrubbing

liquid

temperature

monitoring

device

and

specific

gravity monitoring device, each equipped with a

continuous recorder, shall be used.

21

Where

condenser

 is the final recovery device in

the

recovery

system,

condenser

exit

(product

side)

temperature

monitoring

device

equipped

with

continuous

 recorder and having an accuracy of ±1

 percent of the temperature being monitored

expressed in degrees Celsius or ±0.5°C,whichever

greater.

31

Where

carbon

the

final

recovery

device

the

 recOv

ery

system,

integrating

regeneration

stream

flow

monitoring

device

having

accuracy

 ±10percent,. capable of recording

the

total

regeneration

 stream mass flow for each

153

regeneration

cycle:

and

carbon

bed

temperature

monitoring

device

 having

accuracy

±1percent

the

temperature

being

 monitored expressed in

degrees Celsius of

±0.5°C.capable

recording

the

carbon

 bed temperature after each regeneration

and within

minutes

completing

any

cooling

cycle.

j)

 Where a scrubber is used with an incinerator,

boiler,

 or, in the case of halogenated vent

streams, a process heater, the following

monitoring

equipment

required

for

the

scrubber:

Al

 pH monitoring device equi~~edwith a

continuous

recorder

monitor

the

scrubber

effluent;

and

Flow

meters

equipped

with

continuous

recorder

the

scrubber

influent

for

liquid

flow

and

the

scrubber

inlet

for

gas

stream

flow.

The

owner

operator

process

vent

using

vent

system

that

contains

 bypass lines capable of diverting

vent

stream

away

from

the

control

device

associated

with a process vent shall comply with either

(e)

(1)

(e)

(2)

this

Section.

Equipment

needed

for

safety

p~rposes, including, but not limited to. pressure

relief devices, are not sub-ject to this subsection.

jj.

The

owner

or operator shall install,

 calibrate,

maintain, and operate a flow indicator that

provides

record

vent

stream

flow

least

once

every

minutes.

The

flow

indicator

shall

installed

the

entrance

any

bypass

line

that

could

divert

the

vent

stream

away

from

the

control device to the atmosphere.

21

 The owner or

operator

shall

secure

the

bypass

line

valve

the

closed

position

with

car—seal

lock-and-key

type

configuration.

visual

inspection

the

seal

 closure mechanism shall

performed

least

once

every

month

ensure

that

the

valve

maintained

the

closed

position

and

the

vent

stream

not

diverted

 through the bypass line.

fj

The

owner

operator

process

vent

may

monitor

an equivalent alternative means or parameters other

than those listed in subsections

(a)

 through

 (d) of

this Section.

 Any equivalent alternative shall be

approved by the Agency and USEPA. and contained in the

source’s operating permit as federally enforceable

permit conditions.

154

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill.

Reg.

__________,

effective

—

______________________________________________________________)

Section

219.435

Recordkeeping

and

Reporting

Requirements

Every

owner

 operator of a reactor or distillation

unit

with

TRE

index

value

4.0

less

 shall keep

records, for a minimum of

years,

the

following

parameters measured during a performance test or TRE

determination required under Section 219.433 of this

Subpart, and required to be monitored under Section

219.434

this

Subpart.

fl..

Every

owner

operator

source

that

seeks

demonstrate

compliance

with

Section

219

•

432(a) (1)

this

Subpart

 through the use of either a

thermal

catalytic

incinerator

 shall maintain

records of the following:

Al

The

 average firebox temperature of the

incinerator

 (or the average temperature

upstream

and

downstream

the

catalyst

bed

for

catalytic

incinerator),

measured

least

every

minutes

and

averaged

over

the

same

time

period

the

performance

testing

and

~j

 The percent reduction of VON determined as

specified in Section 219.433(c)

 of this

Suboart achieved by the incinerator, or the

concentration of VOM (ppmv,

 by compound)

determined as specified in Section 219.433(c)

of this Subpart at the outlet of the control

device, on a dry basis, corrected to

3

percent

oxygen.

21

 Every owner or operator of a source that seeks to

demonstrate compliance with Section 219.432(a) (1)

of this Subpart through the use of a boiler or

process heater shall maintain the records

described below.

 Any boiler or process heater in

which

all

vent

streams

are

introduced

with

primary

fuel

are

exempt

from

these

requirements.

Al

description

the

location

 which the

vent

stream

introduced

into

the

boiler

process heater; and

~1

 The average combustion

temperature

the

boiler or process heater with a design heat

input capacity of less than 44 megawatt

measured at least every 15 minutes and

averaged over the same time period of the

performance

testing.

155

31

 Every owner or operator of a source that seeks to

demonstrate compliance with Section 219

•

432(a) (2)

of this Subpart through use of a smokeless flare.

or flare design

 (i.e., steam—assisted.

air—assisted, or nonassisted), shall maintain

records of all visible emission readings. heat

content

determinations,

flow

rate

measurements,

and exit velocity determinations made during the

performance test, continuous records of the flare

pilot flame monitoring, and records of all periods

of operations during which the pilot flame is

absent.

ii

 Every

owner

operator

source

that

seeks

demonstrate

compliance

with

Section

219.432(b)

this

Subpart

shall

maintain

 records of the

following:

Al

Where

absorber

the

final

recovery

device

the

recovery

system,

the

exit

specific

gravity

(or

alternative

parameter

which

measure

the

degree

absorbing

liquid

saturation,

 if approved by the Agency

and

USEPA.

and

 average exit temperature of

the

absorbing

liquid

 measured at least every

minutes

and

averaged

over

the

same

time

period

the

performance

testing

(both

measured

while

the

vent

stream

normally

routed

and

constituted)

~l

Where

condenser

 is the final recovery

device

the

recovery

system,

the

average

exit (product side) temperature measured at

least every 15 minutes and averaged over the

same

time

period

the

performance

testing

while

the

vent

stream

 normally routed and

constituted

~j.

Where

carbon

a~be~

the

final

recovery

device in the

recovery

system,

 the total

stream mass or volumetric flow measured at

least every 15 minutes and averaged over the

same time period as the performance testing

1~u1lcarbon bed cycle), the temperature of

the

carbon

bed

after

regeneration

(and

 within

15 minutes of completion of any cooling

cycle(s)), and duration of the carbon bed

steaming cycle

 (all measured while the vent

 stream is normally routed and constituted):

~j

 As an alternative to subsection

 (a) (4) (A).

(a)(4)(B)

or

 (a)(4)(C). of this Section, the

concentration level or reading indicated by

the

 organic monitoring device at the outlet

156

the

 absorber, condenser, or carbon

absorber, measured at least every

minutes

and

averaged

over

the

same

time

period

the

performance testing (measured while the vent

stream

normally

routed

and

constituted):

~

 All measurements and calculations performed

determine

the

flow

rate,

VON

concentration, heating value,

 and TRE index

value

the

vent

stream.

Every

owner

operator

reactor

 distillation

unit

with

TRE

index

value

less

than

4.0

shall

sublect

the

exceedance

reporting

requirements

the

draft

Enhanced

 Monitoring Guidelines as published at 58

Fed.

Reg.

54648

 (October 22.

 1993).

Every

owner

operator

source

 seeking to comply

with

Section

219.432(b)

 this Subpart shall maintain

records

the

following:

jj.

 Any changes in production capacity. feedstock

type,

catalyst

type,

any

 replacement.

removal,

addition

recovery

equipment

reactors

and

distillation

units;

and

21

Any

recalculation

the

flow

rate,

VON

concentration, or TRE index value calculated

according to Section

 (ci of Appendix G of this

Part.

~j

 Every owner or operator of a source claiming a design

capacity of less than

 1 gigagram (1.100 tons) per year,

as contained in Section 219.431(b)

 of this Subpart,

shall maintain records of the design capacity or any

changes in equipment or operations that may affect the

design capacity.

Every

owner

operator

 a source claiming a vent

stream

flow

rate

vent

stream

concentration

exemption

level,_as_contained in Section 219.431(b)

(5)

this

Subpart,

 shall maintain records to indicate that the

stream

flow

rate

less

than

0.0085

scm/mm

the

vent stream concentration is less than 500

ppmv.

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Reg.

_________,

 effective

—

_________________________________________________________ )

Section

219.436

Compliance

Date

Every

owner

 operator of an source sub-lect to Sections 219.431.

219.432, 219.433.

219.434

219.435

this

Subpart

 shall comply

with its standards, limitations and mandates by March

15,

 1996.

157

(Source:

 Added at

_____

 Ill. Req.

_________,

effective

—

SUBPART

FF:

BAKERY

OVENS

Section

219.720

Applicability

The

provisions

this

Subpart

 shall apply to every

owner

 operator of a source which operates a bakery

oven,

 defined at

Ill.

Adm.

Code

211.680,

unless

the

source

bakes

products

only

for

on—site

human

consumption

on—site

 retail sale.

Notwithstanding

subsection

(a)

this

 Section,

a

source

required

comoly

with

the

 control

requirements

 this Subpart only if the source has the

potential

emit

22.7

(25

tons)

VON

per

year,

the

aggregate.

from

all

emission

units

the

source, excluding:

~J

 Emission units regulated by Subparts B.

E.

F.

H,

0.

R.

 S. T (excluding Section 219.486 of this

Part),

V.

X.

Y,

 Z or BB of this Part; and

21

Emission

units

that

are

included

any

the

following categories:

 synthetic organic chemical

manufacturing industry (SOCMI) distillation,

 SOCNI

reactors, wood furniture coating, plastic parts

coating (business machines). plastic carts coating

(other). offset lithography, industrial

wastewater. autobody refinishing,

 SOCMI batch

Processing, volatile organic liquid stora~etanks

and clean—up solvents operations.

Every

owner

operator

source

which

has

 limited

its potential to emit below 22.7

(25

tons)

VON

per

year,

specified

subsection

(b)

this

Section,

through

 federally enforceable permit

conditions

not

required

comply

with

this

 Subpart.

Every

owner

operator

bakery

oven

which

exempt from the control requirements of this Subpart

because of the criteria in subsection

 (b) of this

Section remains subiect to the recordkeepinq and

reporting requirements of Section 219.728(b) of this

Subpart

and

the

certification

requirements

Section

219.730(d)

this

 Subpart.

(Source:

Added

____________

Ill.

Reg.

effective

 ___________________________)

Section

219.722

Control

Requirements

158

o~r

 or operator of

 a source subiect to the

control

 reouirements of

this

Subpart

shall

comply

with

the

?~irementsof~section

(a)

(1)

(a)(2)

g~f

sec~qn

 for each

baker y

oven

wit ha

rated

heat

in pu,~

ca~acitvof

least

mmbtu/hr

least

586

kW:

2p~rateemissions capture and control equipment

~hichach~eves

overall

io n

~ncQntrolled

VOM

emissions

least

percent

from

each

such

 bakery oven;

~pr

21

 Provide

eaujvalent

alternative

control

plan

for

~c~bakery

ovens

the

source

which

has

been

~pp~oved

byt

 Agency

and

USEP1~ through

federally

fnforceable oermit conditj,gp

ion

Or coer~tor

of

e

sc’urce

sub~ect::~h~~ontrol.

~i’~~j~mcnts_of

 this Sut-j~rt

V

~Iect to

eXempt

 frolt

fl~cOntro

at~r~nents

Lr

~WDseCt1Ons

 (a)~l) or

~j~pfl.W1tj~.

.actuaj

VO~

emissicn~

1es~

th:an

c~u~l~to15

rF~rroyaded

that

the

tot~

acti~..a1

em~s.io~s

fi~

~Hsuch

 ei~pt bakery ovens

no’ver

exceeds

25..TPY.

c)

Notwi

S*

t~io~:(á)

:~f

i9~

oi~Iy

 source

 i~iay

~ect

 to comply

with

the co~troIrequ

~Fç~~~j1

 (cJjfl_or

(cj~2~ cf

this

Sectaoi~

 rather

~~the

 control

recmire~ents-

fJ2i_

 of t~iis

~ectaon~

a’

er~.msslDn UrUt.S

 -~tth~

jrc~

 in the

 grega~te

eyclnding~s~o~.üni?~

~

B

E

F

H

~excIithj-~gSect.~pn

~g~Q5

tlu,s

Subpart).,

T~., S.

 ~excJ~u~,Thg

Sectior

~B6

 this Sii~j~rt,V

Y

Y..

 ‘Z or ~3Bof this

~ubn~rt

 havc~~~itheoret~

~

~.OQ

tcjis~

0

____

~

~-v.

~- ~

tb.~.. 9 ~

tC~i~r.J

°~

~-‘~:

em

 ~om~s

 ~ie’

a

r~onr

~cnt~a

inea:

in~-~eaei-akIy

en~’crcea~ble

a

~evizicn

 Qperate

 ~ssacr~s

c~pt~re.ar~dccntrol

eau)T~ent

t3rcomt~c3I1~d

~~OM~as.sions

 Iea~t60

percent

frc~_each

bakery

oven

~tJ

z’.at~

be-at

 i~put

~t:.

l.e~t..•

~

..-..-:.-.-.-.-.-.-

—~

Provide

ecrni-y-alert

a..ter~at~ye

control

plan

for

SUCh~:hakCrV.~

~p~roved

b’s-

tne

)~cencv

an~

~EP’~

thro-uqh

federally

159

bakery oven that

becomes

subject

the

requirements

this

 Subpart at any time shall remain

sub-ject

the

requirements

this

Subpart

all

times

thereafter.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Req.

_________,

effective

_________________________________________________________)

Section

219.726

Testing

Upon

request

the

Agency,

the

owner

operator

bakery

oven

shall,

its

own

expense,

conduct

such

tests

accordance

with

the

applicable

test

methods

and

procedures

specified

Section

219.105(f)

this

Part

demonstrate

compliance

with

the

control

requirements

this

Subpart

and

shall:

Notify

the

Agency

days

prior

conducting

such

tests;

and

21

 Submit all test results to the Agency within

days of conducting such tests.

j~j

 Nothing in this Section shall limit the authority of

USEPA pursuant to the Clean Air Act

(CAA)

 to require

testing, or shall affect the authority of USEPA under

Section

114

the

CAA

(42

U.S.C.

7414

(1990)).

(Source:

 Added at

_____

Ill.

Req.

__________,

 effective

—

_________________________________________________________ )

Section

219.727

Monitoring

Every

owner

operator

bakery

oven

 sub-iect

the

control requirements of this Subpart shall install and

operate at all times a device to continuously monitor

the

following

parameters

for

each

type

 of control

device as follows:

fl.

 For catalytic oxidizers, the inlet and outlet

temperatures

the

oxidizer

21

For

regenerative

oxidizers,

the

temperature

the

combustion

chamber;

31

For

thermal

 incinerators, the temperature in the

combustion chamber.

The

owner

 or operator may monitor with an alternative

method or monitor other parameters if approved by the

160

Aaenqy

and

USEPA

throuch

federally

p~g~g~a

permit

aSIP

revsi.

(Source

Added

Ill.

Reg.

_________,

effective

Eecor~eeoinq

and

Reporting

 Every

owner

operator

bakery

oven

shall

maintain

-t,j-je

 following

records

for

the

most

recent

consecutive

~~~period

for

all

bakery

ovens

sub~ect

t othe

control

~~ements

 of this Subpart.

 Such

records

shall

made

available

the

 Agency immediately upon

 req-uest.

~L~~eters

 for control devices

 as monitored

mursuant

Sn

 219.727

 of this Subpart~

21

 Hrs/4~yof operation of each bakery

oven~

Factors

necessary

 to calculate VON emissions

for

all.

bakery

ovens

including.

but

not

limited

ç,

type

dough

used

for

each~y~aSt—1eavened

baked

product,

initial

yeast

percentage

for

each

product,

total

fermentation

time

for

each

product.

any additional percentage

 of yeast added,

 and the

fermentation

time

any

additional

yeast;

Calculated

daily

VON

emissions

each

bakery

oven

expressed

lbsJday;

Total

amount

each

 typ~

yeast—leavened

bread

product

produced

by

each

bakery

oven

ex~jressed

lbs /d~y~

~~y~owner

operator

bakery

oven

which

is

~~~from

the

control

recuirements

this

Subpart

~~use

the

criteria

Section

219.720(b)

this

p~r~

shall

maintain

records

necessary

demonstrate

that

its

potential

emit

i~jess

than

22.7

(25

VON mer year,

 as smecified

 in Section

2~.720(b).

Such

records

shall

maintained

for

the

most

recent

consecutive

year

period

and

shall

mad~

available

the

Aoency

immediately

upon

reguest.

~~o~ercr

 omorator of a~kery

oven

which

i-s

~~ro~t~’e

 contro

 re~marente~~te

Of

this ~ub~rt

~g~US?

 ~fle

crmtera-a

sr~ec~fae~

 Section

2lg.722fb~.

0~thIS

Sub~art

shall

~

 x~.air ~rec~rda

 oe~sa.~yto de~onstrat~

that the

actual

VO?~~

from

e~e~pt

bakery

ovens

are

less

t~n or e~a1 to 15

TPY

or

eah

 ~.aker-yOVen

~9

less

 than

or eoi~!to

25 TP~

~rom

all

exempt

~ekerv_ovens

c~-ied.

 records s~a.l1be

161

~

 for thE

~oEt

 recent

coisecnt±V~.

3

 ye-ar

ç~Od

~nd

~ha1i

made

available to the A~er~cy

~j.

~lfy~he

~-q~ncy

 ~‘r1ting

if the a~t~alVO~

~~sic~s

from

 eyempt

bakery

oven

 ever exceed

~

~EL.

watJ~

days

after

the

 exce-edanoe occurs

~cb

notice

shall

include

 copy

of all records of

c~i

~

,al~.2a?~cI~

~

~

 less

~

 SucIi

r?cords shalj

be

 ~De-C~ for 1~j~~ost

c~fl~coneecj~tave

 sear per

 ~âI-~ ~

(Source:

Added

____

Ill.

Reg.

__________,

effective

Section 2l9.~22~

 çcmpliance

Date

On and after

 arch

15,

1996,

upon

initial

startup

upon

:~fiça~o~,.

eY~Y

o~r

operat

 or of

a

source

 subje

tto

Subpa~,

c,~PmOly,~ith the

recuirements

this

Subpart.

(Source:

Added

_____

Ill.

Reg.

__________

,

effective

Section 2l9~~

 tification

a)

Every~p~nEr

 Pr .gperatorof

 a source sub ect

 o the

contrQ)~.~re~ire

 ments of this Sub~a

rt ~

 QQ~~y

compliance

with

this

Subpart

before

date

consistent

with

Section

219729

this

Subpart.

owner

operator

bakery

oven

subject

the

control

reauirements

this

Subpart

changes

the

method

compliance,

the

owner

operator

shall

certify

compliance

with

the

reauirernents

this

Subpart

for

the

alternative

method

umon

changing

the

method

of

compliance.

All

certifications

comtliance

with

this

Subpart

shall

lnçlude

t~e

results

11 tt~

calculations

merformed

demonstrate

that

 each oven at

the sou~cQ,is incomp1janc~

it~~

p~,,

~,,

 exempt

~

the

control

re~uirements

this

SubDart.

The

certification

shall

include

the

followinc:

162

21

 Th~~ameand identification number

each

oven

~

 any associated cacture and control device

21

The

maximum

rated

heat

input

each

oven

21

AfJ.assification

each

oven

either

 “bakery

as defined

in

Ill.

 Adm.

 Code 211.680 or

oven

used

exclusively

bake

non—yeast—

leavened

products;

~~caoture

and

control

efficiency

 each

bakery

control

device

.~j

~t

 renorts, calculations, and other data

D~cessary

demonstrate

that

the

capture

and

~ptrol

efficiency

each

bakery

oven

control

~~yice

 achieves an overall reduction

in

uncontrolled

VOM

emissions

least

percent

and

~j

 The date each bakery oven control device was

installed and operating.

~J

g~~

 March i5~ i996~ or upon initiais ta~up~,,

eve~y,owner or

opera

to

of

 a bakery

o

y~n

~hich~..

exeI1~p~,~,,

fro

 Con rol recuire

 f this Subpa~t

because

the

criteria

Section

219.720(b)

this

~~p~rt

shall

certify

that

its

 notential to emit

is

less

than

22.7

(25

tons)

VON

per

year,

~p~gjfied

Section

219.720(b).

on

 before ~arch 15,

i~96

 or upon lnit~ajstartUp,

eveiy~cwnezi.gr

ppcrator_ot

Jak~r’~ oVen

w~jc;~h

is

~

fro~

the

c-ontrol

rem1are~ents

th.~s

Subpart

~ecause of the cratcrae

soc~fied In Sect.~.c~~l94722~b)

of~-tIi~ SubpaI~t

shal3~: c~rtify

that.

~CtU~2

V~M

 ~~em

from any

indavidual

 exempt-

bake

oven

ne

•~••~~•••••~

Tpy and that VON emissicns

fro~l

s~j.~th?

~g~gate

 never

e~eed

 25 T~Y.

~j

 p~~~before~arch

15

 i996., or ~

 ~flit~

 ~t~tUP

if

p~~O

~arch

i992.

 ev~r~

own-er

oz~

opçr.ato~

a

~~ç~~oven

 which

controlling

 ssior~~a~provided

—

.‘

LJ~

‘~~

:~~‘--~

~C’.

that

its

na~jnuin

theoretaca.l

 ae~io~is

a-s

~pecified

i~

s~±on -9

(Source:

Added

_____

fl~

Re~

__________,

 effective

SUBPART

PP:

 MISCELLANEOUS

FABRICATED PRODUCT

MANUFACTURING

PROCESSES

163

Section

219.926

Control

Requirements

Every

owner

operator

miscellaneous

fabricated

product

manufacturing

process

emission

unit

 subject to this Subpart shall

comply

with

the

requirements

subsection

(a),

(b)

(C)

this

Section:

Emission

capture

and

 control techniques which achieve

an overall reduction in uncontrolled VON

emissions

least

percent

from

 each emission unit,

or

(Board

Note:

For

the

 purpose of this provision,

an

emission

unit

any

part

activity

 source of a

type

that

itself

subject

control

requirements

in other Subparts of this Part or

CFR

60,

incorporated

reference

 in Section 219.112,

 e.g.,

a

coating

line,

printing

line,

 process unit,

a

wastewater

system,

other

 equipment, or is otherwise

any

part

activity

source.)

For

coating

lines,

the

daily-weighted

average

VON

content

shall

not

exceed

0.42

VON/i

 (3.5

lbs

VON/gal)

 of coating as applied

 (minus water and any

compounds which are specifically exempted from the

definition of VON) during any day.

 Owners and

operators complying with this Section are not required

 to comply with Section 219.301 of this Part, or

c)

 An equivalent alternative control plan which has been

approved

the

Agency

and

the

USEPA

federally

enforceable

permit

SIP

 revision.

(Source:

Amended

Ill.

Reg.

,

effective

____________

SUBPART

QQ:

NISCELLA.NEOUS

FORMULATION

MANUFACTURING

PROCESSES

Section

219.946

Control

Requirements

Every

owner

operator

 miscellaneous formulation

manufacturing

process

emission

unit

subject

this

Subpart

shall

comply

with

the

requirements

subsection

(a)

(b)

bclow~

this

Section.

Emission

capture

and

control

techniques

which

 achieve

an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of

least

percent

from

each

emission

unit,

(Board

Note:

For

the

purpose

this

provision,

emission

unit

any

part

activity

 source of a

type

that

itself

subject

 control requirements

in other Subparts of this Part or 40

CFR

60,

incorporated by reference in Section 219.112,

 e.g.,

a

coating line,

 a printing line,

 a process unit,

a

164

wastewater system,

 or other equipment, or is otherwise

any

part

activity

source.)

eauivalent

alternative

control

plan

which

has

been

approved

the

Agency

and

the

USEPA

federally

enforceable

permit

SIP

revision.

(Source: Amended at

Ill.

Reg.

____,

effective

_________

SUBPART

RR:

 MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC

CHEMICAL

MANUFACTURING

PROCESSES

Section 219.966

 Control Requirements

Every owner or operator of an miscellaneous organic chemical

manufacturing process emission unit,

 subject to this Subpart

shall

comply

with

the

requirements

subsection

(a),

(b),

(c)

bc.pwof

this

Section.

Emission

capture

and

control

techniques

which

achieve

overall

reduction

uncontrolled

VON

emissions

least

percent

from

each

emission

unit,

(Board

Note:

For

the

 purpose of this provision,

an

emission unit is any part or activity at a source of a

type

that by itself is subject to control requirements

in other Subparts of this Part or

CFR

60,

incorporated by reference in Section 219.112,

 e.g.,

a

coating line,

 a printing line,

 a process unit,

a

wastewater

system,

other

equipment,

otherwise

any

part

activity

 source.)

equivalent

alternative

 control plan which has been

approved

 the Agency and the USEPA

federally

enforceable

permit

SIP

revision.

Any

leaks

from

components

subject

the

control

requirements

this

Subpart

 shall be subject to the

following

control

measures

March

15,

1995:

1)

 Repair any component from which a leak of VOL can

observed.

The

repair

shall

completed

soon as practicable but no later than 15 days

after

the

leak

found,

unless

the

leaking

component

cannot

repaired

until

the

process

unit

 shutdown,

 in which case the leaking

component must be repaired before the unit is

restarted.

For

any

leak

which

cannot

 be readily repaired

within

one

 hour after detection, the following

records,

set

forth

this

subsection,

shall

kept.

These

 records shall be maintained by the

owner

operator

for

minimum

two

years

after

165

the

date

which

they

are

made.

Copies

the

records shall be made available to the Agency or

USEPA

upon

verbal

written

request.

The

name

and

identification

the

leaking

component;

The

date

and

time

the

leak

 detected;

The

action

taken

repair

the

leak;

and

The

date

and

time

the

leak

 repaired.

SUBPART

TT:

OTHER

EMISSION

UNITS

Section

219.980

Applicability

The

requirements

this

Subpart

 shall apply to a

source’s VON emission units, which are not included

within

any

the