i~PR—15-2002 16:47
2177829807
2177829807
P.02
BEFORE
THE
ILL
f~4i~ROL
BOARDAPR 152002
N THE MATTER OF:
WATER QUALITY AMENDMENTS TO
35
IlL
Adm.
Code 302.208(e)-(g), 302.504(a),
302.575(d), 303.444,309.141(h); and
PROPOSED
35
Iii. Adm, Code 301.267,
301.313, 301.413, 304.120, and 309.157
NOTICE OF FIL1T~G
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Mathew Dunn
illinois Attorney General’s Office
Environmental Control Division
James R. Thompson Center
100 WestRandolph Street
Chicago, illinois 60601
Attached Service List
Marie E. Tipsord
illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 WestRandolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Legal Service
Illinois Department ofNaturalResources
524
South Second Street
Springfield, Illinois 6270 l-17~7
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filedwith the Office ofthe Clerk ofthe Pollution Control
Board the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s COMMENTS, a copy ofwhich is herewith
servedupon you.
ILLINOIS ENViRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Sanjay K Sofat
Assistant Counsel
Division ofLegal Counsel
Dated: April 15, 2002
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Springfield, illinois 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
)
)
)
)
)
STATE OF IWNOIS
PollutIon Control Board
R02-11.
(Rulemaking
-
Water)
/e
~f/
ThIs
1~XLINGPRINTED
ON RECYCLED PAPER
i~iPR15-2002 16:48
2177829807
2177829807
P.03
~~iVED
CL!~g’S
OFFICE
BEFORE
THI~
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
~
i. 5 2002
STATE OF IWNOIs
Pollution Control
Board
iN THE MATTER OF:
WATER QUALITY AMENDMENTS TO
35
Ill. Adm. Code 302 208(e)-(g), 3
02.504(a),
302.575(d), 303.444, 309.141(h); and
PROPOSED 35111. Adm. Code 301.267,
301.3 13, 301.413, 304.120, and
309.157
AGENCY’S COMEMNTS
THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (“Agency”) respectfully
submits its comments in the above-entitled matter to the illinois Pollution Control Board(“Board”).
The Age~icyappreciates this opportunity to submit comments supplementing the comments it
presented during the two public hearings. These comments will address request for additional
information made duringthe March
~,
2002 Board Public Hearing and the Agency’s proposal
regarding the implementationprocedures.
I. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Illinois’ Section 303(d~list:
Albert Ettinger oftheEnvironmental Law & Policy Center requested a clarification on whether the
Mississippi Riveris listed as impaired for dissolved oxygen in the illinois’ Section 303(d) list.
See
Transcript for March 6, 2002 Hearing (“Tr.”), p.3g. The Agency’s review ofthe 1998 Section
303(d) list revealed that the Mississippi River is not listed as impaired because ofdissolved oxygen
problems.
Stmam Survey Reports:
Board Member Girard inquired ifthere are any published models that show a relationship between
the ammonia effluent limits and its impact on the oxygen demand from the ammonia in aquatic
environment. Tr, pp. 41-42. The Agency witness, Bob Mosher, testified that he is notpersonally
aware of any suchmodels, however, believes that the Agency’s stream studies would be helpful to
)
)
)
)
)
R02-ll
(Rulemaking
-
Water)
2
I~PR—15—2002 16:48
2177829807
2177829807 P.04
mistake, the lower value of9.9 was inserted into the proposed rule and also put into page 20 ofthe
Agency’s original Exhibit F. The Agency believes that the appropriate inputs were n 6 and t =3
as shown above. Therefore, the chronic standard proposed for the Board adoption is 11 ~.tg(L.
IL IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES
At this time, the
Agency has respectfully decided to not submit a draft proposal
for the application
of the dissolved metals water quality standards in pemlits (“implementation procedures”). This
decision will afford the
Agency
additional time to develop such procedures. Therefore, we will not
be complying with
the
HearingOfficer’s request for submission ofimplementationprocedures. The
Agency believes that it needs additional time to review the existing Board arid
Agency
rules to
identify the areas that are in need ofimplementation procedures. With the help ofa stakeholder
work group, the
Agency will
develop a draft proposal forthe Board or proceedto the first notice if
such procedures do not
require Board rulemaking. Ifthe internal review and the
work group
concludes that aparticular implementationprocedure belongs in the Board regulations, the Agency
will propose such rules
for the Board’s
adoption.
For
the permitting procedures,
the Agency intends to follow the procedures
outlined in
the USEPA
publications,
Technical Support Document For Water Quality Based Toxics Control, EPA/50512-
90-001 (March
1991),
and
The Metals Translator: Guidancefor Calculating A Total Recoverable
Permit Limit From A Dissolved Criterion,
EPA 823-8-96-007
Respeeffiully.Submitted
ILLINOIS ENV1RONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY
By:________________________
Sanjay K Sofat
Assistant Counsel
Division ofLegal Counsel
DATED: April 15, 2002
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217)
782-5544
4
FRPR—15-2082 16:48
217782988’?
2177829887
P.85
ILLINOIS. EPA
-
BOW
-
DWPC
-
MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
FACILITY-RELATED STREAM SURVEY (FRSS) REPORT
A. Facility: Anna MWWTP
NPDES
Permit
27481
Exp.:
08/31/00
Cot~t~i:
Union.
________ ~
Po~ula~on:4)750
Tv~eof
facility:
minor municipal
BOW Reoion:.7
Survey date: 9/1/99
Report
date: October 30, 2000
Discharge ID: AD 181 03
Treatment level: activated sludge, sand filters
j~~:0.85 mgd or 1.3
cfs
Q~E:.1.65 mgd or 2.6
cfs
L~stma~grup~rade:12/1/98
C,SO’s: 0
Disinfection status: year-round exemption (since8/28/95)
Q~erationaIcondition of facility:
Agency
effluent data after
12198
indicated good operation, with some
inconsistency (in
part
due to
structural
problems with sand filters)
Effluent bioassay
data
available
April
1992
B. Receiving stream: Cache River (AD)
BasinJsj~b-basin:Ohio River ~A)/CacheRiver (AD)
USEPA
stream
reach: 05140206-030/on
ReceMncj
stream BSC:
Cache
RiverRM 0.0 to 52.6, C, 1992
Receiving
stream
7Q.1 0: 0 Stream
order Cache
River) 2 (at facility outfall) WBID:
ILAD
05 WBSEG: AD 05
Approx. discharge rates
during survey (09/01/99): (1) Cache River site
A-I,
0.1
cfs
or 0.06 mgd;
(2) MWWTP effluent, 0.8 cfs or 0.5 mgd; (3) Cache River site C-I. 0.9 cfs or 0.6 mgd.
Apprpx.
dilution ratio: 0.12:1
Other
cause_s
and
urces of impairment: urban
runoff
Previous
Illinois_EPA
facility-related stream surveys
(mofy~)~:
04/14,08/84,
05/92
Findings of previous lllinoks~PAsurveys downstream from the
Anna MWWTP:
The 1984 survey found that aquatic macroinvertebrate communities indicated
very
poor conditions in Cache
River downstream
from
the
Anna MWWTP.
The 1992 survey also ‘found very poor conditions in Cache River downstream from the Anna MWWTP.
C.
Biological findings
ol
this
survey:
Aquatic macroinvertebratecommunities indicated good condition5 in
‘Cache
River, upstream (site A-i)
and
downstream
(sites
C-I ,C-2,
and
C4) from the
Anna
MWWTP (Table 2).
Fish were
observed
at sites A-i, C-I, C-2, and C-4. Schools of minnows (Cyprinidae) were observed at all four
of these sites. Topminnows (Fundulus) and mosquitofish (Gambusia) were observed at site C-2. Fish
communities were sampled at sites C-2 (AD-il)and
C-4
(AD-to). Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) values at sites
AD-il (44), AD-Ia (48). and AD-OS
(44)
Indicated good fish communities at those sites,
in
July and September
1999. (Table 3)
Biological data from samples collected at sites AD-I1,
AD-I
0,
AD-OS,
and AD-OS, in 1999, indicated full support
of aquatic
life
use in the 17.2-mile stream reach of Cache River downstream from the city of
Anna (Table
13).
APR—15—2002 16:49
2177829807
2177829807 P.06
Figure 1. Sampling
locations
In Cache River, In the
vicinity
of Anna MWWTP, Union County. UIinoI~,
AUgUet 31 and September 1, 1999, and Januaty IS, 2000.
Tablet. Sampling
locations
in
Cache
River
(stream
code AD) and
types
of samples
collected
In the vicinity
of
Anna MWWTP,
NPDES
permit
27481, Union County. Illinois, August 31 and September
1.1999,
and January 19,2000
Site
Code
UMS
Site
Code
W~
Body
-
0~st
(mites)
Upeir
0’
OreS
Loc~tlo~
T
R
1/4
se~
Lathudo
•
Longitude
‘‘
Sample
T)r~~~
—T~$~$~
Stream
lope
order mile (RM)
Map
AI)-A1l-Al
Cache R
0.12
U
Walk ki
125
1W
NEll
372847
891400
M,D.HW
2
54.9
2800
AD-AN-Si
AD-AN-Cl
Elffue~t
Cache
R
0
0.3
—
—
8tftuentat final
~z~k
Walk In
125
125
1W
1W
N~17
NEll
872854
372856
801406
891407
D.W
M,O.W
—
2
54.5
547
280B
2800
AD--Il AO-AN-CZ
CacheR
0.7
0
N-SUmekilnRd
125 1W
SWOO 372915
89 1550
M.F.D I-LW
2
64.1
2800
4D-,~It+C3 Cact,R
1.5
0
Wajkhabend
12$ 1W
NWO9
372953
891348
W
2
Ss~ 2800
AD—ia
A0.AN-C4
C.ache
R
1-9
0
Walk
In
U
uflfl 1n1
125
1W
SWO4
373005
591340
M.F.D~H.W.S
2
52~9
2TiC
AD-.N4.C6 CacheR
2.2
0 WalkinOunn9lb
125 1W
3W04 373008
891323
W
2
52~8
VIC
AD-OS
cache
R
70
P
Rd. 0~S
rvi4 SW Saratoga
125 1W
SWO1
373016
891015
M.F.D.H.W
4
47.8
271C
05
Cache
R
16.0
0
Rd.
I
ml
N
ofMt Pleaaant
12$ IE
3W14
372800 390437
M,P.D.H.W
4
58.5
280A
- Olstw,c.8001 Anna MWWTP ou~8(~a.emmiles)
Sam~Ie(ype
PA .. Macrci,Wedebates
0— Dlachacge Moaauramert
F—
F1~h
Commilnuly
W-W~tt,Chenulstiy
H - Habitat estknates ortansects
S
- Sediment Chemlaty
AD-OS (RM
47.8)
~.
AD-OS
(RM 3e.B)~.
C—3
(AD-it)
pe3mNGLe ~X~T~0M
N
A-i’
Azu~oa~
(ac~5Io)
i~iPR—15—2~2 16:49
21 778298~7
21778298~7 P.@7
Table 3. Fish community sampling
results
from Cache River sites in the vicinity of the Anna MWNTP, 1999
BIOS
‘
FISH SPECIES
Sito~
AD-Il
Scientific
Common.
Date~ 6l24I~2
911199
-
Cache
Rjvor
-
‘
AD-OS
611192
81910w
AD-b
6124192
911199’
AD—06
1~11~7119199’
Code
Name
Name
Method~,BP+SH
ES
BP+SH
-
ES
-
ES
ES
ES
-S--
ES
3008
Amia
calva
Bowlin
i
301 B
3020
3025
~scramericanus
Grass
PIckerel
Campostoma anomalum
Central
Stoneroller
104
Cyprinu.2
CarpiO
Common
Carp
334
120
666
4
I
42
2
4
i
3052
3058
3061
3064
3069
3200
Nofropis
Iutionws
Red Shiner
3
Lythrunjs
umbratilis
Redfln Shiner’
21
Cyprinelfa whipplsi
Steelcolor Shiner
-
Pimephales flotaliL9
Bluntnose Minnow
15
Setnolllusafrornaculatus
Creek
Chub
13
Suckers
Catostomidae
3
7
9
S
60
70
‘
20
3
11
18
9
52
19
205’
81
51
63
78
10
30
12
9
14
5
2
3073
3075
3081
3089
Calostomus commerscni
White
Sucker
Edmj~zon
oblongus
CreekChubsucker
7
Minytrema t~ieIsnops
Spotted Sucker
Aweiuru$ nat~1i~
Yellow Bullhead
13
-
11
1
22
4
28
4
1
1
1
7
2
1
4
21
21
2
2
3095
Noturusgyriflus
Tadpole Madtom
1
4
3
4
2
3
7
3100
3105
Aphredoderussayanus
Pirate
Perch
Fundulus
notateas
Blackstripe
Topminnow
21
I
11
3106
Fandulus
oilvaceus
Blackspotted Topminruow
‘
12
6
2
4
3114
Can fra,vhus
macropterus
Flier
2
3116
3120
3121
3122
3125
3128
3127
3149
Lopomiscyanellus
Green Sunfish
Lepornis macrochtrus
Bluegill
Lepo,nismegalotis
Longear Sunfish
Lepomis
mcroiophus
Redear Sunfish
Micmpteiuepunctu(atus
Spotted
Sass
Miropterus salmoides
Largemouth Bass
Pomoxisannularis
White
Crappie
Perciria macolata
Bladcside
Darter
14
14
5
-1
2
4
1
14
60
14
g
4
21
14
129
4
12
1
2
3
75
92
49
20
-i
1
81
-
4
3157
CoItus carol!nae
-
Banded Sculpin.
8
22
2
-
Hybrid sunflsh’
I
NumberollndMduals;
167
553
190
1093
384
322
129
45
S
NumberotTaxa~
8
14
10
16
16
j5
14
-
Index of Biotic Integrity (lBl)~
38
44
38
48
38
44
38
*
Method: BE—Boat Electrofishing, BP—Backpack
Electrofishing, ES—Electroselne, SH—Seine Haul
Hybrids
not
included
in number of taxa.
Partial sample
(no
IBI value)
Ann#99fl5P0.w~
(04/17/00)
ciPR—15-28~2 16:49
2177829887
2177829807
P.08
Table 5. Field and laboratory water chemistry
from Cache
River (AD) .and an effluent
sample, in the vicinity of Anna
MWWTP, January 19, 2000.
TNTB code;
AD-li
AD~1O
AD-OS
STORET
FRSS code: AD-AN
AD-AN
AD-AN
AD-AN
AD-AN
AD-AN
AD-AN
CODE
Parameter
-
Site:
Al
El
Cl
C2
C3
C4
CS
SW Saratoga
Sample
Time
800
830
845
930
1000
1030
1100
1300
Discharge (cis)
.
0.80
Discharge (mgd)
0.5
20
Air
Temp(SC)
-1
-1
.1
0
2
3
3
3
-
10
WaterTemp(C)
6
13.2
7
5.9
52
5.2
4.9
3.6
11
WaterTemp(’F)’
43
56
45
43
41.
4-I
41
38
400
pH
(units)
7.9
6.9
7.6
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.1
,
8.1
-
94
ConductivIty
(pmhoslcm)
-
565
647
580
560
540
528
522
460
299
DIss
Oxygen
(mgII)
113
9.0
10.9
11.2
11.0
11.4
11.1
12.3
301
Diss Oxygen
Saturation
*
93
88
92
93
89
92
89
95
80082
BOD Carb
(mg/I)
1
1
2
1
1 K
I K
I K
- -
310
,
BOD Total
(mg/I)
2
2
3
5
1
1
1
- -
580
1. OrganIc Carbon
(mg/I)
20
5.3
2.7’
2.4
22
2.5
2.4
3.4
530
Susp Solids (mg/I)
20
5
23
24
,
25
22
30
22
610
NH3+NH4 N (mg/I)
0.14
0.01 K
0.06
0.01 K
0.01 K
0.01 K
0.01 K
0.01 K
612 Un-ion
Ammonia N (mg/I)’
0.002
0.001 1 0.001 K
0.001 K
0.001
K 0.001 K
0.001
K
0.001 K
630
N02+N03
N(rTig/l)
1.7
19
4.6
3.5
3.5
3.8
3.8
38
665
Phosphorus Tot (mg/I)
0.09
4.6
0.84
0.58
0.65
0.73
0.76
0.75
900
Hardness(mg/I)’
234
168
222
224
215
212
206
185
916
CalcIum Tot(mg/I)
63
37
59
60
58
‘
57
56
55
927
‘
Magnesium Tot
(mg/i)
19
18
18
18
17
17
16
12
929
937
Sodium Tot (mg/f)
-
-
Potassium Tot (mg/i)
21
2.2
55
11
26
3.2
24
2.8
23
3.0
24
3.5
23
3.8
23
4
1105
Aluminum Tot (pg/I)
400
100 K
470
550
760
550
850
220
1007
Barium
Tot
(pg/i)
60
15
54
58
60
59
63
64.
1012
Beryllium
Tot
(pgll)
1 K
1 K
1 K
I K
1 K
I K
1 K
1 K
1022
Boron Tot
(pg/I)
38
280
83
65
67
71
78
65
1027
CadmiumTot
(pg/I)
3 K
3 K
3 K
3 K
3 1
3 K
3 K
3 K
I
034
Chromium
Tot(pg/I)
5 K
5 K
5 K
5 K
5 K
5 K
5 K
5 K
1037
CobaltTot(ii,g/I)
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10
K
10 K
1042
CopperTot (pg/I)
10 K
-
18
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 J(
10 K
1045
Iron
Tot (pg/I)
450
74
520
630
840
740
930
350
1051
Lead
Tot(pgIl)
50 K
50 K
50-K
5 K
50 K
5 K
50
K
5 K
‘1055 Manganese Tot
(pg/I)
38
15 K
35
36
33
30
40
78
1067
1077
Nickel
Tot (pg/I)
Silver Tot (pg/f)
25 K
25 K
25 K
3K
‘
3K
31
25 K
‘3 K
,
25K
3
25 K
25
3K
3
K
‘
25 K
K
3K
1082
Strontium Tot (pg/I)
4900
170
4000
4300
3800
3400
3100
880
1087
,
VanadiumTot(pg/I)
5
K
5 K
5 K
5 K
5 K
5 K
5 K
.
5 K
1092
ZincTot(pgfl)
100 K
100 K
100 K
100 K
100 K
100 K
100 K
100 K
71900
Mercury (pg/I)
0,10 K
0.10 K
0.10 K
0:01 K
0.10 K
0.01 K
0.10 K
0.01
‘
Calculated
J
-
Estimated
K
- Less than stated detection limit
F~PR—15—2002 16:49
2177829807
2177829807
P.89
Table 7.
Illinois
EPA effluent sampling results
from
Anna municipal wastewater
treatment
plant, NPDES permIt 27481, 1995-1999. (All
units
are mg/I, except as noted.)
10
Water
Temp
403
Lab
pH
610
Ammonia
-
612
Un-ionized
310
Total
80082 -—
Carb
530 -
T
Susp
Date
Time
(‘C)
(‘F) (units)
a~
N
Ammonia
as N
BOD
-
BOO
.
Solids
95(01131
930
7
45
7.8
1.2
0.007
14
18
95/02121
830
8
46
7.8
0.61
7
10
95104/05
845
8
46
7.5
.
1.4
0.009
15
31
95/05/15
915
18
64
7.7 -
0.80
0.013
11
25
95/06/13
900
20.
68
7.5
0.96
0.012
7
, 13
95107(06
830
23
73
- 7.8
0.35
0.011
19
-
70
95/08(08
~i5
25
77
7.6
2.7
0.060
11
17
95/09120
1330
21
70
7.3
1,6
0.013
12
9
95(10(15
900
13
55
.
7.3
1.4
0.007
9
9
95/11(08
845
10
50
7.4
4.0
0.019
17
22
95/12111
-
-103
4
39
7.8 .
0.156
55
72
96/01/23
815
11
52
7.6
3.4
•
0.027
7
20
.
96/02/14-15
800
9
48
7.8
14
0.095
28
.
17
-9~/04/10
. 900
10
50
7.7
4.4
0.041
iT
8
96/05/01
845
14
57
7.8
0.46.
0.008
16
20
96106/11
900
20
68
7.8
0.40
0.010
12
35
96/07~31
845
22
72
1.7
1.4
0.031
14
12
96/00/20
26
79
7.5
2.1
.
0.042
18
42
96/09(17
830
20
68
7.8
10
0.155 •
19
34
96/10/21
1030
17
83
7.8
2.7
0.034
20
25
96/11/18
7.9
4.2
9
42
96/12/03
845
11
52
7.9
2.3
~,
0.036
22
23
97/02106
815
8
46
7-9
3.6
0,045
24
28
97703/04
-
830
11
52
7.7
0.80
0.006
15
33-
97104/01
900
10
50
7.9
-
1.0
0.015
20
31
97106116
830
7.5
2.5
20
34
97/07/09
845
22
72
7.6
2.7
0.051
14
38
97108125
900
23
73
7.7
8.6
0.159
20
23
97/10126
13
55
7.1
.
8.5
-
0.105
•
27
14
97112(22
.
7.8
6.7
•
24
40
98101120
5
41
7.9
55
.
25
.
98/03/30
915
13
55
.
7.2
0,07
11
98/04/21
930
14
57
7.1
0.49
4
8
98/06/11
800
.22
72
7.0
0.26
6
.
28
98/07/09
815
24
75
7.3
4.1
20
19
98/08/19
845
25
77
7.2
0.42
1
3
98/09/22
- (no dlscI~arge)
.
98/11/05
815
19
65
7.5
0.23
2
2
98/12/08
800
17
63
7.2
0.18
2
.
9
0.057
0.001 K
0.002
0.001
0.043
0.004
99/01/26
99/02/23
99/03/02
99/05/18
99/06/16
99/07/14
99/08/31
99/09/01’
99/09/28
99/10/26
99/11/16-17
99/11/23
99/12/28
12
54
7.1
12
64
7.3
7.6
20
68
7.4
7.4
24
75
7.4
29
84
7.3
1100
25.3
78
6$’
23
73
1.5
17
63
7.2
7.3
i8
64
7.2
10
50
7.3
6_9 *
0.33
0.27
0.14
0.97
1.2
0.40
0.26
0.65
6.3
0.83
0.01 K
0.25
0.01 K
00I K
0.003
0.001
0.001 -
0.001
0.010
0.006
0.004
0.003
0.102
0.004
0.001
0.001 K
2000/01/19
830
13.2
56
0.001 K
4
2
2
4
3
2
3
I
10
3
1K
5
2
2
11
2
5
12
4
5
5
20
15
2
10
24
8.
S
1K
I
K— Less than stated detection level
N:
48
48
52
52
45
52
2
52
Average:
16.2
61.2
7.5
2.8
0.031
12.2
19.7
Minimum:
4
39.2
69
1101
K
0.001 K
I K
a
Maximum~
29
84
7.9
22.0
0.159
55
72
NPIJt~permit limits:
(8/28/95.8/31/0)
• Field
pH
Apr-Oct
Nov-Mar
Ammonia
mean
15
40
m~n
(~O~Inv,J1~
In
I
F~PIR—15—2002 15:50
2177829807
2177829807
P.10
Table 10. Concentrations of metals, nutrients, and organochiorine compounds
in sieved (63 microns) stream sediment samples from Cache River,
downstream from Anna, 1992 and 1999.
-
Site:
AD-Il
AD-lO
-.
AD-06
.
STORET
River Mile:
CODE
Parameter
-
Date:
54.1
1011192
52.9
- -
911199
41.8
611192
7119199
Metals
and Nutrients (mg/kg,
dry
weight)
339
Chemical Oxygen Demand
37200
.
*
15400
- -
70322
Solids, Volatile ()
4.2
3.1
2.8
2.9
627
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
1060
1100
721
1618-
668
Phosphorus
900
578
443
452
938 Potassium
1000 K
710
1000 K
530
1003
Arsenic
4.7
1 K
5.6
-
3.5
,
100$
Barium
113
-
66
102
64-
1028
Cadmium
1
0.3 K
1
0.3 K
1029
Chromium
34
9.6
12
7.0
1043
Copper
21
82
9
6.0
1052
Lead
44
17
17
8.9
1053
Manganese
~j~1
36
690
370
1068 Nickel
14
8.2
13
7.2
1078 Silver
2
0.32
.
1
0.5 K
1093
Zinc
106
1170
Iron
15000
42
8200
41
14000
24
7700
71921
Mercury
0.10
0.10 K
0.10 K
0.10 1
Organochiorine compounds (pglkg,
dry
weight)
39519
Total
PCR’s
-
10 K
10 K
•~
,
~
10 K
39333 - AIdrin
I
K
I K
I K
I K
39383
Dieldrin
-
~
I K
I K
39301
p,p’DOT
44
I K
10 K
1 K
39311 p,p’DDD
11
1.5
1
K
I K
39321 p,p’DDE
-
6.7
1.2
1 K.
1 K
39359
TotalDOT
10 K
I K
10
K
39064
Chlordane, cis isomer (alpha)
22
2 K
-
11
2 K
39067
Chlordane, trans isomer (gamma)
16
-2 K
17
2 K
39351
Total alpha
& gamma Chiordane I
s
K
.1
281
5 K
39393
Endrin
.
I K
1 K
I K
I 1
39461
Methoxychlor
.
5 K
5
K
5 K
39076
Alpha
BHC
-
I K
I K
I K
39343
Gamma BHC(Lfndane)
.
I K
I K
I K
39701
Hexaohlorobenzene
I K
1
K
I
K
39413
Heptachior
I K
I
K
I
K
39423
l-Ieptachlorepoxide
I K
I K
I K
81618
Trifluralin
.
-
10 K
- -
10
K
39631
Atrazine
-
- -
50 K
--
,
50 K
81407
Alachlor
- -
10 K
- -
10 K
81409
Metribuzin
- -
-
rn
K
- -
10 K
38923
Metolachtor
.
- -
25 K
- -
25 K
82409
Pendlmethatin
- -
10 K
- -
10 K
49196
Captan
- -
10 K
- -
10
1
82543
Cyanazine (Biadex)
- -
25 K
•-
25 K
K
-- Less than stated detection level
- -
Not analyzed for
Nalues that are
shaded are elevated, and values
that are outlined are highly elevated, based on
Short1 I~971
FRPR—15-2~02 15:5w
21778298~7
21778298I~7
P.11
Table 12. Illinois EPA habitat data for Cache River sampling sites
in
the vicinity of Anna,
1999.
INTB code:
AD-Il
AD-b
AD-O6
FRSS’code:
AD-AN-Al
AD-AN-Cl
AD-AN-C2
AD-AN.C4
Habitat Parameter
Date:
Aug 31, 99
sept.~~eo
Aug 31,99
Sept.i, 99
Jul 19,99
425
605
543
400
800
540
11
1.1
11
40
60
54
222
118
106
117
12
8
15
33
3
3.4
3.8
58.1
2.5
2.8
17
10.2
11.3
12.8
18.6
16.1
12.0
18.6
31.1
4.3
11.0
12.3
1.7
8.5
7.6
6.8
09
1.9
0
1.7
6.6
0
11.9
0
0
3.4
2.8
26
9.3
2.8
0
000
0
0.9
0
SAMPLING
REACH
-
Station Length
-
Fish (ft)
- -
- -
T. Transect Reach -
Habitat (It)
200
200
No. Habitat Transects
0
0
Transect Interval (ft)
-
-
- -
- -
Incrempnt VVldth (tt)
1. No. Habitat Samp’e Points
--
0
-
--
0
T. No. Velocity Measurements
I
I
T. No. Channel Width Measurements
- -
- -
SUBSTRATE
()
Silt
-
Mud (-cO.063 mm).
Sand
(0.063
2 mm)
5J
14 J
8
8
J
J
Fine Gravel (0.08 0.3 inches)
10 J
8
J
Medium Gravel (0.2
-
0.6 inches)
15 J
8
J
Coars~Gravel
(06
-
2.5 inches)
a J
15 j
Small Cobble (2.5-5
Inches)
-
4 J
j
Large Cobble (5- 10
inches)
2 J
14 J
Boulder
(~- 10 inches)
I J
-1
J
Bedrock
-
10 J
4 J
Claypan
-
Compacted Soil
14 J
7
j
Plant Detritus
14 J
.
5J
Vegetation
3 J
2 J
Submerged Logs,
0 J
0 J
Other
- o~
HYDRAULIC
FEATURES.
StreamOrder -
. -
2
-
2
2
2
4
Discharge (cfs)
cii
1.9
J
1.2
-
0.6
1.8
-
Mean
Channel Width (It)
- -
- -
47
50
68
Mean Width ofWater (It)
4
12
225
20.2
22.3
Mean Velocity ~ Q (discharge)
0.63
0.2 J
0.65
0.75
0.83
Mean
Velocity (cts/wd)
.
0.08
020
J
0.06
0.07
0.06
Mean
Depth (It)
0.3
0.8 J
og
-
0.4
1.3
Mean Depth at Thalweg (It)
Mean
Width!
Mean Thaiweg Depth
--
--
--
-
1.8
12.5
0.9
22.4
2.0
11-2
Water Level
.
Normal
Normal
-
Normal
Normal
Normal
Water
Level Trend
Stable
Stable
-
Stable
Stable
Stable
Pool
40
J
40 J
51.7
316
35.4
Riffle
Run
20
J
40 J
20
40
J
J
1~2
31.9
.
14.6
46.8
7.0
46.9
Slack
OTHER
.
.
- -
- -
1.2
70
10.8
-
Shading
()
50
85
33
45
50
lnstream Cover Total ()
- -
- -
8.21
8.68
7.1
Boulders
- -
- -
1.98
3.37
1.26
Undercut
bank
- -
1 J
2.58
1.47
1.74
RoclclClayLedge
--
1 J
0.77
1.16
1.10
Submerged
tree roots
1 J
1
J
1.81
1.51
1.01
Brush-debris
jams
t J
1
J
0.00
0.43
0.24
Logs
--
--
0.60
0.56
1.18
Aquatic
Vegetation
- -
.
- -
0.27
0
0
Submerged Terrestrial Vegetation
.
- -
- -
0.18
0.06
0.51
Other (trash)
- -
- -
0~02
-
0.02
0.02
Potential
Index of Blotic
lnte~~y
(PIBfl
.
39.8
41.0
42.5
42.8
36.3
J
—
Estimated
IiPR—15-2~02 16:5w
2177B298~7
21??8298~7
P.12
~ (_V
f/I(.
ILLINOIS IEPA
- BOW - DWPC - MONITORING AND -ASSESSMENT
FACILITY-RELATED
STREAM
SURVEY
REPORT
A.
Facility: Urbana-Champaign SD SW
NPDES
Permit: 00315-26~
Exp: 09/30/98
County:
Champaign
Location:
Urbana-Champaign -
-
Population: 63,502
(Champaign)
BOW Region:
4
Survey Date: 08/12/97
Report
Date: 02/21198
Discharge 1D: 0 01902
Treatment
Level: Sedimentation, activated sludge. and rapid sand filtration with excess flow
treatment * nitrification/denitrificatión and_phqsphorus removal; Sludge treatment consists of
aerobic digestion, belt filtration, floatation thickening_and land application.
Disinfection Status; Year-Round
DAF/Max (mgd): 5.90/1 2.50
CSO’S:
.
Last Major Upgrade (year): 1982
Operational condition of facility (from DWPC records, operator’s comments, and/or
observations):
Violations of permit
limits
over
last year (from
DRMRs and FOS monitoring):
A
summary
of IEPA
effluent monitoring_data is included as Table 3.
Effluent
bioassay data available? YesX
No~
WBID: 1L013.
B.
Receiving Stream:
Copper Sloug~
Basinlsub-basin: K-askaskia River
USEPA stream Reach:
071402_Ol
Receiving Stream BSC/year: C
-
1986
BSC Other/year:
—
Receiving Stream 7Q10: ~Q
Stream Order:
2.
Discharge of Receiving Stream downstream from
WWTP
outfall, during survey:
Discharge at station Cl was measured at 21.10 cfs on
the
day
of the survey.
Discharge of Facility at outfall: .4.52 mgd (daily averag~ior
O8I1.2/97)~
(Facility flow meter..&.. or
IEPA measurement_)
Est. dilution ratio during survey:
Other Potential Sources
of
Impairment Urban runoff
/ Development
Previous Surveys (years): FRSS (1980.
19~3.1987, 1992)
-
Findings of previous surveys; Data
from the 1992 FRSS survey did not indicate any
impact
to
Copper Slough in the vicinity of Urbapa/Champajgn SW STP. There were no
violations to state general use water quality standards at that time.
-
~PR—15-2002 16:50
2177829807
2177829807
P.13
C. Biological Findings
of this survey: Based on cal~u1atedMB1 scores, overall stream
quality was good within Copper Slouah and Kaskaskia Ditch in
the
vicinity_of
Urbana/Champaign
SW STP.
No appaçent
.irn~actwas
observed within Copper SIoi~h
downstream from the outfall during this su~ey.._
0.
Water quality findings of this survey: There
was no indication of malor water quality
problems and no aeneral use water Quality violations were identified during this~surv~y,,
E.
Recreational use,
actual or
potential:
F.
Conclusions:
1. Based on MB! scores, overall siream guaIi~was good. No
a~~arent
imD~ct
was
observed to the bioloolcal communities within the receiving streams.
2. There were no indication of malor water auality
problems and no general use
water quality
violations were lientified.
G.
Recommendations:
I-I.
Monitoring and assessment
staff
who worked on this survey.
Jim Hefley
Mark Joseph
Don Jarrett (intern)
fi~f~rm/3-16-98
Figure 1. Stations sampled on streams in the vicinity of Urbana/Champaign SW STP,
F\)
:~3
~
F~
-Lt~JI~JL~1v’~”
~r&’ii~~
w
co
August 12,
1997.
-u
73
~,~\lL~’
/fr~~~
~
I-~
~.
~
~_~ ~.
~
4~:~
~
I
----~-~2
.
~
~—~—
/~,
I
-~
Ia. ~°
~
..‘_____
1
Il
~
~
~
~.
/
.~
~
:
(
(
I
‘t
~--j
~.i
~K’111J4~.~4~
~
!C(~-~4~J.(
~
3~
~L1’?~)
c~
0
0.2
~0.4 ~
0.8
~~1~Miles
705
c~\JSCA~~E~CALE3I
;~_~
N
F1PR—15—2002 16:51
2177829807
2177829807
P.15
Table
1.
Macroinvertebrate data
collected
during the UrbanaIChampaign SW FRSS.
August 12,
1997.
STATION
TAXON
TOLERANCE
RATiNG
Al Cl
C2 C5
DZ
Plecoptera
OIigoneuriid~e
Corydalidae
Calopterygidae
T~ichoptera(Non-Hydropsychidse)
Heptsgenhidae
Sialidae
Amphipoda
Baetidae
Potamarithidae
Tipulidse
Cyrenidae
(Corbicula
fIuminae)
Anisoptera
Ephemeridae
Cambaridae
Ceratopogorudae
Elmidae or Dryopidae
Sphaeriidae
Caenidae or Tricorythidae
Coenagrionidae
Hydropsychidse
Asellidae
Chironomidae (Non-Chironomus)
SImullidse
Turbeltaria
Other Gastropoda
Planorbidae
Scirtidae (larvae
only)
Lyrnnaeidae
Ancylidae
(Femssia
sp.)
Tabanidae
Culicidae
Hirudinea
Physidae
-
Oligochaeta
Red Chironomidae (blood midge)
5.0
1
5.5
5.5
27
5.5
6.0
6.0
19
6.0
6.0
12
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
9.0
7
10.0
1
11.0
1
4
11
11
6
5
41
434
6
21
11
2
14
61
51
47
18
21
11
1
1.5
3.0
3.0
3-5
3.5
3.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
2
I
I
I
24
2
7
9
11
4
24
13
I
24
17
10
60
13
1
1
3
140 129 176
11
11
13
5.1
4.7 5.2
I
TOTAL ABUNDANCE
TAXA
RICHNESS
MBI
I
I
2
52
1-1
4.6
2
31
I
93
15
5.2
RPR—15-2002 16:51
2177829807
2177829807
P.16
Table 2. Water Chemistry
results from
Copper Slough In the vicinity of
the
Champaign SW STP,
August12. 1997.
PARAMETER
GENERAL USE
STANDARD
Al
El
ci
C2
D2
-
State Water Quality Standard Violation
— Calculated value
~ Standards are hardness dependent acute standards
are
eridosed
in parenthesis.
(a)
Total ammonia
nilmgen shall not exceed 15.0
mglL~Unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.33 mg/I (acute)-
or 0057
(thronic average) diailng summer months.
(b) Effluent standards apply
to
daily maximum concentratIons,
.
Field Water Temp.,
Deg. C.
Field
pl-l,
units
Field Dissolved Oxygen, mg/I
Field Conductivity, umhos/cni
Ammonis Nitrogen, mg/I
Unionized Ammonia, mg/I
Nitrate + Nittlte-N, mgiI
Total Phosphorus, mg/I
BOD,rng/I
-
BOb c.arb (Inh.), mg/I
TOC (carbon, total or9anic)
Total Suap. Solids. mg/I
Feral
Coliform
T. Mercury. ugIl
mg/I
65—8.0
5.0 mm
15.0(a)
03310.057(a)
.
0.5 ugh
21.1
7.9
5.6
302
034
0.012
0.82
0.06
3
2
6.2
26
3900
0.1
2t0
7.5
8.1
584
0.17
0-002
6.3
0.59 -
3
1
6.8
3
3700
0.1
21.0
.
3.1
7.7
451
0.38
0.020
3.4
0.29
4
2
7
16
2700
0.1
22.8
8.1
7.8
431
0.49
0.030
3.4
0.23
4
2
7.1
11
3500
0.1
21.5
8.3
8.8
458
0.47
0040
2.3
0.15
2
1
5.5
11
1500
0.1
17.3
83
10.2
~
0.88
0.056
0.34
0.04
2
1
3.6
6
1100
01
T. Calcium.
mg/I
29
31
31
31
40
58
T. Magnesium,
mg/I
T. Sodium,
mg/I
T. Potassium, mg/I
.
T.Aluminum,ugIl
T.Barlum,ugil
T. Boron,
ugh
5000
ugh
1000 ugh
11
16
2i
440
58
180
16
67
9.5
110
13
650
14
43
5,9
270
34
430
13
39
5.3
190
35
380
18
36
4.3
170
94
440
28
33
2.1
100
210
550
T. Beryllium.
ugh
1. Cadmium,
ugh
~
(11.5)3
1
3
1
(13.6)3
1
(13.3)’3
1
(18i)3
1
(27.8)3
T. Chromium.
ugh!
5
‘5
5
5
5
5
1. Copper, ugh
(20.4).clO
10
(23Mc-io
(23.0)l0
(29.7)10
(425)1 0
T.Cobaitughl
Tlrorr,ughI
10
620
.
10
53
10
290
10
200
10.
200
10
100
T. Lead. ugh!
‘
(98.6)’SO
50
(100)c50
(l00)50
(100)50
(100)50
T.Mangariese,ugll
1000 ugh
39
15
28
21
23
17
T. Nickel, ugh
1000 ugll
‘25
‘25
25
‘25
25
25
T. Silver.
ugh
5.0
ugfl
‘3
3
3
‘3
3
. 3
1. Strontium,
ugh!
120
140
140
130
220
400
T. Vanadium, ugh!
‘5
‘s
5
s
5
5
1. Zinc,
ugh
l000ughI
100
100
100
100
100
‘100
- Hardness. mg/I
.
116
143
134
132
173
253
RPR—15-2~2 16:52
2177829807
2177829807
P.17
Table 3. STORET generated summary of IEPA effluent monltonng data collected between
August 20, 1993 and June 19, 1997
for the (JrbanalChampaign SW STP.
IW~TIAL
DATE
93/08/20 93/10/Q5 93/12/05 94101/21 94/03/25 94/04/7’,
94/0612.7
94/09/02
94/2.0/22..
5521’IAI. 5584!
2.100
1100
1134
1030
1040
1418
5135
2.030
2040
co~si~caoR TIME.ST~TEsTIcsL
~
cd-v-
cs-v-
co-v.
~
c;-v-
co-v-
co—v-
ez’.v-
co-y-
MED~UN
WATER
WAlKS
WAlES
WATER
MATES
WATER
WATER
WATER
W).O15
DEPTR-FTISNK)
0
0
0
0
0
9
• 5
0
98932.
DATSIOME)
93/05/20 95/80/09 93/2.2/01 94/02.121 94/02/29
94/04/27 94/04/17 94/09(02
04(10~21
PIOD.L TIME.NUMGER OF
SAMPLES
1100 SC 12.00 SC 12.34 SC
2.030
SC 1040 SC 2.42.5 SC 1115
SC 1030
SC 2.040
oc
2275
1
8.
3.
2.
1
1
2.
1
3.
00403 911
2.53
SO
5.2
0.4
8.4
77
03
0.4
8.2
6.2.
30930 929300!
709
WBTT
MG/I.
1
8
2
5
2.
1
4
2
90610 955.11114- 70
TOTAL.
MG/I.
.02.05
.070
.0105
.LS00
.260
.070
a3o
.110
.340.
00665
P505-TOT
HG/T.
9
.200
.290
.2511
440
.400
260
.22.0
.570
.160
14041 1109
SAMOL!
OTDAT~
950420
990420
950420
980420
850420
950420
950420
930470
950420
60008 500
bC 502.7 C2.R MG/I.
1.0K
2.0
1.0K
2.0
2.0
2..0K
1.01
3~0
2.05
8581233.
DAIS
94/3.1/23
92/01/27 95/03/03 95/05/2.9 95/07/24 95/12./2.7 96/03/01 96/04/26
96/08/07
INITiAL TIME
1149
1015
2.050
0935
1100
0936
1100
1139
1015
OP-SPACE Cr0 ‘rTNZ-STATISTIOAL CCXC
CP-V-
CO’.~P-
CP.V-
C2.V.
~p.Y..
~9V
Cp-V..
CP-V-
C9-V-
14691CM
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
872.755
WATER
WATER
95775-97(5145)
0
0
0
iI
0
0
0
0
0
£2933.
09.75(0145)
9412.3.123 95/02/27
95/05/03 59/09/iS 96/07/24 99/U/i?
94/03/01 94/04/26
86(06/01
21521
TIME-NUMBER
OF SM(PLES
1149 SC 1025 SC 2.050 SC 0935 SC 1100 SC 0935 SC 2.100
SC 2.139 SC 1013
SC
PIPE
3.
1
1
1
2.
3.
2.
2.
00403
95
LAS
397
0.4
8.3
8.0
8.1
81
02
82
8.3
00550
9551005
TOT NFr.T
MC/T..
2
4
12
4
4
12.
22
2
2
00610 553.8754- 87 TOTAL.
MG/L
.070
.2.40
.470
.010
.240
.030
.140
.0101
.02.05
0o663
P503-TO?
oss/3. 9
.130
.090
.840
.2.60
.360
.360
.460
.350
.730
14041 WQP
5324L0
JPOAISD
950420
550420
960208
940221
960723.
960509
960717
940117
562.029
60082 POD
8CC 5057 C8&
MG/I.
1.0
1O
20
2.0
2.0
7.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
2111552.L
DATE
94/07/24 96/09/06 96/10/15
56/tUGS
56/2.2/26 9C/12/iO 97/01/Si 97/01/il
51/05/24
2873787.0. TIME
202.5
0919
1015
11115
1500
2.300
1100
2.100
1045
CP..OPACE OR
TIME-NIATISTICAL. 90MG
CO-I-
CP-V-
cp-v-
ce-v-
cr-v-
cp-v-
CL’-V-
C9-V-
CA-V.
55010287
WATER
YASiR
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
879455
WATER
55759(
Dspm-FrCsNK)
0
a
a
o
a
o
228721 DATB(0557
95/07/85 96/09/06 96/10/18 96/11/08 96/12/55
96/2.2/2.8 97/01/52. 97/02/51
97/03/24
P~05LTmS-NVMSER
OP 303198.23
1015 SC 0935 SC 1015 SC 1015 30
1600 SC 2.500 SC 2100 SC 12.00 SC 1043 SC
8585
1
3.
2.
2
1
1
1
1
00433
PR
L).S
SO
6.3
7.9
6.4
8.4
8.2
8.2
8.3
83
00330 2538005
705 N?L?
NU/L
2
16
4
2
8
8
9
9
3.2
0062.0
.7054. 98 50792.
(40/I.
.0105
1300
.040
.080
.310
.340
.040
~C4fl
~130
00664
PaDS—TOT
MG/I. 7
.2.57
.270
.470
.350
.369
.560
.550
.550
.980
74041 “~P.
59,9177.5
UPDATED
970314
970514
91Q53.4
970524
970713
971024
97012.5
972.024
971024
50082
500
200 SOAP 02.9.
MG/I.
.
1.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
20
20
2.0
3.0
-
INITIAL
PATS
97/06/3.5
IOLITIAL ‘rIME
1210
OR TIME-STATISTICSJ. OOJEC
C5-V-
WATER
DEP8E-FT(SMK)
a
£2705.
0573(0MW)
97/06/15
P5501.
?1R-NU~2R
09 301498.23
1210 SC
PIPE
2
00403
95
LAS
SC
5.5
60530 5552005
70T NFL.T
MG/I.
8
0343.0 553.9394. 98 70151.
140/I.
.050
74041
WQF
SNIPLE
UPDATED
971024
00002 900 ICC 5021 022.
940/7.
2.550957 95IWLIRYAL DATE
98/03/24
FRPR—15—2002 16:52
2177829807
2177829807
P.18
Table
4.
Summary
of habitat characteristics
for streams in the vicinity of the
UrbanalChampaign SW STP, August 12, 1997.
All values are field
estimates.
1-(ab!tat
Parameter
Al
Cl
C2
C5
D2
Stream Width (ft)
~
Q
16
20
20
25
12
Stream Depth (ft) @ Q
1
0.7
0.7
0.9
1 2
Pool()
0
0
5
0
0
Riftle()
5
0
20
0
0
Ruri()
95
100
75
100
100
Shading()
0
0
0
0
0
BUt/Mud()
0
0
0
0
0
Sand()
0
0
2
2
10
Fine Gravel ()
20
20
10
25
20
Medium Gravel ()
25
35
35
55
30
Coarse Gravel ()
37
35
30
15
10
Small Cobble ()
0
0
2
0
0
Large Cobble ()
0
0
3
0
2
Boulder()
3
0
5
1
3
Bedrock
()
0
0
0
0
0
Claypan ()
0
0
5
0
0
Plant Detritus ()
0
0
3
2
5
Vegetation()
15
10
5
0
20
Submerged Logs ()
0
0
0 -
0
0
Other()
0
0
0
0
I~PR—15-2o02 16:52
2177829807
2177829807
P.19
Table 5~.Location of stations sampled during the Urbana/Champaign SW FRSS, 1997.
Station
OZYA-CH-A1
OZYA-CH-E1
OZYA-CI-1-C1
OZYA-CH-C2
OZY-CH-C5
OZY-CH-D2
Description
Copper slough, approximately 100 yards upstream from the point of
discharge; Champaign County; T19N~R8E. SWZO;
40 05’05” /88
19’44”
Urbana/Champaign SW sewage treatment
plant effluent;
Champaign County; TI9N, R8E. SW2O;
40 05’02” /88 1 9’57”
Copper Slough, approximately 100 yards downstream from the point of
discharge; champaign County; 119N, RBE, SEI9;
40 05~02”/88 2003”
Copper Slough, approximately 0.28 mile downstream from the point of
discharge; Champaign County; TI9N, R8E, SEI9;
40 05’02” /88 20’16”
Kaskaskia Ditch, approximately 1.5 miles downstream from the point of
discharge;
Champaign County; TI
9N, R8E, SW3O;
40 04’12” /88
20’44”
Kaskaskia Ditch, aproximately 0.6 mile upstream from the confluence
with
Copper Slough; Champaign County;
TI9N, R8E, SWI9;
40 05’02” /88
20’53”
IRPR—15-2002 16:52
2177829807
2177829807
I ~
P.20
ILLINOIS
IEPA
-
BOW
-
DWPC
- MONITORING
AND
ASSESSMENT
FACILITY-RELATED STREAM SURVEY REPORT
A.
Facility: Clinton
STP
NPDES
Permit: 0023612
Exp: 09/30/00
County: Dewitt
Location: Clinton, DL
Population: 7,437
BOW Region: ~
Survey Date:
08118197
Report Date: 04/07/98
Discharge ID: ElI 03901
Treatment Level: IMHOFF and activated_sIudg~followed by rapid sand filtration
Disinfection Exemption Status: Year-Round
DAF/Max (mgd):
I
.68/4.2Q
Permitted CSO’S: Yes
Last Major Upgrade (year): 1988
Operational condition offacility (from DWPC records, operator’s comments, andlor
observations):
Violations of permit limits over last year (from DRMRs and FOS monitoring): A summary
of LEPA.effltLent
monitorinQcLataiS
included as Table 3.
Effluent bioassay data available? Yes
X.
No
WBID: ILEIIOI.
B.
Receiving Stream: Coon Creek
Basin/sub-basin: Sangamon River / Salt Creek
USEPA stream Reach: 07130009
Receiving Stream BSCIyear: C -1982_
BSC Other/year: —
Receiving Stream 7Q10:
Q_
Stream Order:
i...
Discharge of R~ceivingStream downstream from WWTP outfall, dunng survey:
5.93 cfs at Cl
Discharge of Facility at outfall:
0.89
rngd. as a monthly average_for
August 1 99L
(Facility flow meter~.~or IEPA measurement
J
Eat. dilution
ratio, during survey:
Other Potential Sources of Impairment: CSO discharges. urban runoff and non-~~t
sources.
Previous Surveys (years): FRSS (1975, 1979. 1981. 1985. 1989)
Data is also available for C3 from a 1997 intensive_survey on the Salt Creek basin.
Findings of previous
surveys:
Maoroirwertebrate data from the
1989
survey indicated
mo~ierate
impairment to. Coon Creek upstream from the STP and slight to m~erate
impairment to background
sites
on Ten Mile Creek. State general use water quality
standards were
exceeded for cooner. dissoived_oxy~en.iron, and silver
Figure 1. Location of stations sampled on Coon Creek in the vicinity
of
Clinton STP, 1997.
j_jf-’
‘s
~!
(
~
ru.1~(
~-,~“-
1.-.
-
I—
0.5
0
~1::.~~
1 Mites
-U
r’J
I-~
Table 2. Water chemistry results
from
samples collected during the Clinton FRSS,
August 19,1997.
PARAMETER
GENERAL USE
Al
STAN DARD
* State Water Quality Standard VidtaUon
-
‘~ Calculated value
Standards are hardness dependent; acute standards are enclosed in parenihesis.
(a) Total ammonia
ni(togen
shall not
exceed 15.0 mg)L; Unionized ammonia shall aol exceed 0.33 mg/I (acute)
or 0.057 (chronic average) during summer months,
El
Cl
C2
C3
FieldWalerlemp..Oeg.C.
20.2
21.3
20.8
20.9
21.3
Field pH,
units
.
6.5.9.0
7.5
7.3
7.5
7,9
5.0
Field Dissolved Oxygen, mg/I
5.0 mm
4.9
A
6.6
5.4
7.8
7.8
Field CortduclM(y, umhoslcm
561
1267
856
770
- 692
Aninionia Nilrogen,
mg/I
15(a)
0.33
0.14
0.24
0.18
0.12
UnFoni~edAmmonia,mg/I
.
0.33~L067(a)
0.004
0.001
0.003
0.006
0.005
Nilate+
Nitrite, mg/I
2.1
6.5
3.7
3.7
3.3
Total
Phosphorus,
mg/I
-
0.29
0.95
0.56
0.56
0.54
BOD1mg/I
4
3
3
3
3
SOD oarb (lnh.),
mg/I
2
1
1
1
1
TOC
(carbon, total organic)
mg/I
.
5.3
-
6.2
6.0
4.9
5.0
TotalSusp.SolIds,mgfl
13
6
10
15
16
Fecal
Collfomi,
col/lOOmI
6200
•
8400
9100
6700
7200
T.
Mercury,
ugh
0.5 ~
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
1.
Calcium, mg/I
-59
77
69
58
49
T. Magnesium. mg/I
22
32
26
23
20
1. Sodium. mg/I
27
150
81
73
68
1’. Potassium,
mg/I
3.6
6.4
4.9
4.4
4.4
T.Aluminum,ug/I
620
100
660
840
760
T. Barium, ugh
5000 ug!J
120
190
160
120
100
1.
Boron, ugh
1000 ugh
150
480
300
270
220
1. BeryFliuui-i ugh
‘ci
1
1
1
1
1. CadmIum, ugh
‘~
(26.0).3
3
(32.0)3
(25.9)3
(21 .8)’3
1.Chromium,ugh
5
.
5
5
(5
5
T. Copper, ughi
“
(40,3)13
34
(47.9)22
(40.1)17
(34.7)14
1. Cobalt, ugh
-
10
10
10
‘10
‘10
T.Iron,ug/I
1300
66
1100
1200
1000
T. Lead, ughi
(100)’cSO
‘50
(100)50
(l00)c50
(100)c50
1. Manganese, ugh
l000ug/l
140
21
130
110
84
T. Nickel, ugh
1000 ugh
‘26
25
25
25
25
1. Silver) ugh).
5.0 ugh
3
‘3
3
3
‘3
1. Strontium, ugh
130
230
190
160
150
T. Vanadium, ugh
-
‘5
5
5
5
5
1.
ZAnc,ughl
l000ughI
100
360
140
100
100
‘~ Hardness, mg/I
239
322
287
238
204
I-,
a.,
c-n
-U
F’)
F’)
I~PR—15-2002 1654
2177829807
2177829807
P.23
Table 4. Summary of habitat characteristics for stations sampled during the
Clinton FRSS,
August
18, 1997.
Habitat Parameter
Al
Cl
C2
..
C3
* Stream Width (ft) c~
0
10
14
-
-
• Stream Depth (ft) ~ Q
0.79
0.71
-
-
Mean Velocity
(tt/s) ©
Q
0.35 .
0.5
-
-
*
Discharge (cfs) ~
0
2.64
5.93
.
-
Pool()
0
50
25
5
Riffle()
.
20
26
0
5
Run ()
-
80
25
75
80
Shading()
60
20
75
30
Silt/Mud ()
‘2
2
10
0
Sand()
-
10
30
80
25
FineGravel()
5
13
5
40
Medium Gravel ()
4
10
2
20
Coarse
Gravel ()
5
12
0
5
Small
Cobble
()
0
0,
0
0
Large Cobble ()
0
10
0
0
Boulder()
0
20
0
0
Bedrock()
0
0
0
0
Claypan()
-
0
0
0
3
Plant
Detritus
()
,
0
0
0
5
Vegetation ()
1
0
0
2
Submerged Logs ()
2
3
3
0
Other () Cement debris
60
0
0
0
* Denotes measured parameters; all others are estimates.
IRPR—15-2002 16:54
2177829807
2177829807
P.24
STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF SANGAMON
)
)
)
)
)
ss
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, on oath state that I have served the attached
AGENCY’S COMMENTS
upon the persoii to whom it is directed, by placing a copy in an envelope addressed to:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(FIRST
CLASS MAIL)
Mathew Dunn
Illinois Attorney General’s Office
Environmental Control Division
James
R.
Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street
Cbicago, Illinois 60601
(FIRST CLASS MAIL)
Attached Service List
(FIRST CLASS MAIL)
Made E. Tipsord
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James
R.
Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(FIRST
CLASS
MAIL)
Legal Service
Illinois Department ofNatural Resources
524 South Second Street
Springfield, Illinois 62701-1787
(FIRST CLASS
MAIL)
and mailing it from Springfield, Illinois on April 15, 2002, with sufficient postage affixed as
indicated above.
I
OFFICIAL SEAL
BRENDA BOEHNER
2
NOTARY PU6UCI
STATE OF ILLINOIS
~MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
~‘l-~$2005~
c~72id
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN
TO
BEFORE ME
this day ofApril 15, 2002.
~)
AQ$~J~
Notary Public
3c~\i~(
THIS PILINC
PIUNTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
5
I~PR—15—2002 16:54
2177829807
2177829807
P.25
Matthew Dunn
Cbief,
Envi~on~ntalBureau
Officeof the AttorneyGeneral
188 West Randolph Suect, 20th~1oor
Chioago. fllinoic 60601-3218
Lany Cox
Downcr’a Grnve Sry~istnct
2710Cur~ssStreet
Downcr’aGrovc~funds
60515
AlbertBct5nger
Eevñ~eaneotalLaw and Pol
icy
Center
35 PastWacket Driv8, Suite 1300
Cbicago~Illinois 60601-2110
~a~e1d
Depestianitof?ublfr Worica City ofJo1ic~
921 EaatWashington Su~ct
~oliee,
I1linoi~ 604~3
Lisa Frcdc
cernicalluduafty Council
9801 WestHigjis Road, Suite 515
Roseniont,Illinois 60018
boruthyGuem
illinois PollioionConttoL?.c’aid
100 WettRandolph $~eet,Suite
11-500
Chicago. illinois 60601
Jaur.s
T.
H~rrington
Roes & Hard~cs
350
NorthMichigan, Suite
2500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Ron Hill
2I:bLC~OW:NI.fOr
85
Mc~opo1itanWaterReebroationDis~ictofChicago
6001West Pershing Road
Cicero, Xu1i~ois
60804.4112
21:DLC:uOW:NL,
Ibe $6
aththie Hedge
HodZe, Dwyer and Zcmnn
3150 RolandAvenue,
Post
Office Box
5776
Spi-frtgtield, illinois
62705.5776
MssgareiHowaid
Hedinger and X1ow~rd
1225
South SixthSisect
Springfield, tllinoi~62703
2l:C:n0W:~Lthr$5
21:DLC~OW:NLfur5$
Robert
Lawley
CI~efLepiCounsel
Illinois ~epa~ti~ntofNatiaral Resources
524
South Second Seteet
Spring~eld.illinois
62701
Robert
Mes~irja
illinoisEnviosnrnentsl
ii1at~ryGroop
215 FastAdams
$tftee
Sprin~Ield,ilhinoin 62701
Torn MuSh
FoxMetro
Walter
lceelasr,nfign Duels;
682
State
Route 31
O$WgO,
Illinois 60543
2l:DLC:~0W:NT.
for$S
IrWiAPOllS
Metwpo1ic~nWeter Reclamation District ofChcago
600lWcstPershing Road
Cicero, 1llisoI~
6080d-4fl2
21:DL8QW’~tJ.tbr
SS
Maxfe Tipsord
Hearing Officer
IllinoisPollutionCon~ol~oau1
100 Wcst Randolph Stect. Suite 11-500
Chicag; Ulutois 60601
21:DLC:B0W~NLfur SS
~
Callahan
Bloomington Nonnal WaterRechirnationDistrict
p0g
Oftce Box 3301
Bloomington, Ifunois
61102-3307
2I:bLC:aOW~SLfu~
5$
Zl:DBQW~1SL
mess
21~PLC~0W:NLrorss
2t:DLC~0W:NLfur
CS
Zt~DLC~0W:NL
for 55
l1ciaow~r~LSte55
Z1~DL.O8OW~NLfcr
CS
2t~DLC.U0W:NLforCS
21:DLOBOW:NLfbr$6
TIJTflL
P.25