ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February 9,
1995
MINNESOTA MINING
AND
)
MANUFACTURING
COMPANY,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 91—162
)
(Variance
—
Air)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OR THE BOARD
(M. NcFawn):
This matter is before the Board on a Joint Status Report
filed by petitioner Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.
(3M)
and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) on
February
1,
1995.
In their status report, the parties state that
3M seeks a variance from 35 Adin. Code Section 218.105(c), which
is identical to and derived from Section 52.741(a) (4)
of the
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP).
3M has petitioned the United
States Environmental Protection Agency
(TJSEPA)
for a FIP revision
to address its difficulty with the FIP capture efficiency
protocol.
The parties assert that USEPA has stated that it will
delay its decision on 3M’s FIP revision petition until USEPA
completes its study of alternative capture efficiency methods.
The parties further assert that,
in a January 31,
1995 phone
call,
Dr. Robert Stallings of USEPA stated that a guidance
document concerning capture efficiency protocols will be issued
shortly.
The Agency has indicated that it will follow USEPA’s
decision on capture efficiency protocols.
The parties therefore
believe that this matter should be continued until USEPA issues
its decision.
The parties note that 3M has filed a waiver of the
decision deadline until December 31,
1995.
The Board accepts the joint status report.
As requested by
the parties, the next status report in this matter must be filed
by August
1,
1995 or such time as the USEPA takes action on the
pending FIP, whichever is earlier.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby cer ify that the above order was adopted on the
ctc~.
day
of
e4~~
1995,
by
a
vote
of
________
Dorothy M. ~unn,
Clerk
Illinois i~x1lutionControl Board
‘I