ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    October
    28, 1971
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    v.
    )
    #
    71—101
    BELOIT FOUNDRY CO.
    Alvin Liedling, Assistant Attorney General,
    for the Environmental
    Protection Agency
    Stanley Guyer for Beloit Foundry Co.
    Opiniol) of the Board
    (by Mr. Currie):
    The parties have stipulated to the facts relative to this
    Agency complaint.
    Beloit Foundry operates
    a grey
    iron cupola in
    South Beloit, presently equipped with a Schneibel Wet Collector.
    Relying on the manufacturer~s guarantee, Beloit estimated particulate
    emissions
    at
    24.8 pounds per hour, which,
    as it read the regulations,
    was
    in compliance with
    the limit of 25,10.
    These figures were
    reported to the Agency
    in
    a letter of intent filed as required,
    but no program for achieving compliance
    (Acerp)
    was filed because
    the company believed it was already complying.
    In 1970 the company nevertheless employed
    a commercial test-
    ing company to perform a stack test, which revealed that the collector
    was only 50
    efficient and that therefore emissions
    (180 lb/hr in
    the absence of any controls) were substantially
    in excess of those
    permitted.
    Moreover, the company
    in fact misread the regulations,
    so that even the emissions
    as calculated on the basis
    of the
    guarantee were slightly in excess of the 20.7 lb/hr actually permitted.
    Upon learning of the adverse stack test the company contracted
    for the installation of
    a baghouse and other equipment that ~hould
    reduce emissions to the
    low level of
    3.35
    lb/hr.
    Completion
    is
    promised by March
    20,
    1972.
    We note with pleasure that among the
    equipment
    is an afterburner that should reduce carbon monoxide
    emissions even before
    the adoption of our proposed regulation on
    that subject.
    That there has been
    a violation of the regulations with respect
    to
    the filing of
    a program and
    to the emission of particulates
    is
    clear.
    The question
    is one of remedy.
    A shutdown of the plant
    is out of the question.
    The pollution
    is not that severe;
    the plant
    is relatively remotely situated
    and
    the neighbors do not object to allowing continued operation during
    2
    719

    the installation.
    A shutdown would
    put 190 people out of work
    and cripple the company.
    The parties have agreed that we should
    allow operation while
    the company pursues its program,
    and we
    shall
    so order.
    The remaining issue
    is money penalties.
    In light of
    the
    company’s good faith reliance on the manufacturer’s guarantee and
    of its commendable action in proceeding with
    a stack test and
    with plans
    to correct the deficiency,
    we think
    no such penalty
    is necessary.
    This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions
    of law.
    ORDER
    1.
    Beloit Foundry Co.
    shall cease and desist from particulate
    emissions
    in excess of those permitted by the Rules
    and Regulations
    Governing the Control
    of Air Pollution by no later than March
    20,
    1972.
    2.
    Beloit Foundry Co.
    shall pursue with diligence the control program
    described
    in the record.
    3.
    Within
    35 days after receipt of
    this order, Beloit Foundry
    Co.
    shall post with the Agency
    a bond or other security in the
    amount of $150,000
    to assure compliance with the terms of this
    order.
    I.
    Regina E.
    Ryan, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board, certify
    that the Board adopted the above Opinion this
    28
    day of
    October
    1971.
    2
    720

    Back to top