ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 20,
1994
EUGENE W.
GRAHAM,
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 95—89
)
(UST Fund)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.
Yi):
On March 10,
1995,
Eugene W. Graham,
owner of the
Libertyville Citgo
(Graham), filed a petition for review of the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s
(Agency) Underground
Storage Tank Fund reimbursement determination regarding its
facility’s tanks located at 109 South Milwaukee Ave.,
Libertyville, Illinois.
Graham filed the petition for review
pursuant to Section 57.8(1) and 40(a) of the Environmental
Protection Act
(Act)
and 35
Ill.
Adni. Code 732.602(h)
of the
Board’s regulations.
(415 ILCS 5/57.8(i) and 5/40(a)
(1992).)
This matter was accepted for hearing at our March
16,
1995
meeting.
A hearing has been scheduled for May 10,
1995.
On March 20,
1995 the Agency filed a motion to dismiss the
petition for review for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The
Agency states that Graham filed the petition for review pursuant
to Title XVI
(415 ILCS 5/57 et.
seq.),
but fails to meet the
requirements to seek relief under Title XVI.
The Agency also
filed a motion to file its record instanter and the record on
April
4,
1995.
The Agency’s instanter motion is granted.
On March 28,
1995, Graham filed a response to the motion to
dismiss and a motion for leave to amend its petition.
In its
response Graham states that the petition inadvertently referred
to Title
XVI
instead of the former Illinois underground storage
tank response and cost reimbursement program set forth in
Sections 22.18 through 22.18(c)
of the Act.
(415 ILCS 5/22.18-
5/22.18
(1992).)
Graham seeks leave to amend its petition to
conform with the appropriate provisions of the Act under which it
is requesting an appeal of the Agency’s reimbursement
determination.
The Agency has not responded to Graham’s motion
for leave to amend its petition as of the date of this order.
On
March 29,
1995, petitioner waived the statutory decision deadline
until July 31,
1995.
The Board grants Graham’s motion for leave to amend its
petition.
Therefore,
the Agency’s motion to dismiss
is moot.
2
For purposes of calculation of the statutory decision deadline
pursuant to Section 40(a)(2) of the Act
(415 ILCS 5/42(a) (2)),
the filing of an amended petition will restart the Board’s
120-day statutory decision deadline.
Unless an amended petition
is filed on or before May 5,
1995,
curing the above-noted
defects, this matter will be subject to dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy N. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby
ertify that the above order was adopted on the
day of
____________________,
1995, by a vote of
7—e)
?)~ ~
~
Clerk
lution Control Board
/