ILLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June 9, 1971
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
)
)
v.
)
PCB
$
71—30
)
C. E. KOONS
Opinion
of
the Board (by Mr. Currie):
flon about 1966 into July of 1970 Mr. Thons openly dumped
various waste materials on his property near Flora. CR. 13, 14).
He nade no attempt, despite repeated warnings, to comply with the
requirenents of the statutes and the Rules and Regulations for
Refuse Disposal Sites and Facilities CR. 18, 19). The evidence
shows no conpaction
(Rule 5.06), spreading (Rule 5.06), or covering
of refuse (Rule 5.07); dumping over an unreasonably large area
Utile 5.03); inadequate supervision (Rule 5.02), inadequate
access
roads (Rule 4.03); and inadequate equipment for refuse handling
(Rule 5.05), or fire prevention (Rule 4.04). Open dumping itself
is fcrbidden not only by Rule 3.04 but by section 21 of the Environ-
mental Protection Act. The violations are conceded. The respondent’s
exolanation is a financial inability to operate the site in
conpliance with the :aw. CR. 76,77).
Since ?une 1970 Mr. Thcns has determined to close the site
CR. 9, 10).
His duty to cover or remove all remaining refuse is
clear. The Rules clearly require
final covering
of closed sites
with-
in
six ncnths (Rule 5.07
9)).
It has
taken an inordinately
and illegally long
tthe to do
this. Just before the hearing
Mr.
lZoons
borrowed the services
of a farmer and his caterpillar
to push some of the retuse into a pit CR. 25-28) and
he expects
to get the farmer back tc cover ~.twhen the planting schedule
permits CR. 79). One gathers a single day’s work will do the
trick CR. 80). Larger itema such as refrigerators and tires he
has begun hauling away by pickup truck; he thinks this
can be
accomplished with another 5 truckloads, which can be done 2 or
3 a week CR. 81).
We
recognize the claim of financial difficulty, although
there is nothing in the record to back up
the
respondent’s
staterent that he cannot afford ‘o run a landfill in accord with
the law. Poverty is no excuse; people who haven’t money to do
business as the law reauires shouldn’t do business. Mr. Koons
long continued illegal dumping after he knew it was wrong. And
his efforts to close out the site have been far too lackadaisical.
1-883
We cannot allow the cleanup, a1~ady delayed nearly a year since
dumping ceased, to await the
conveiiience
of a nearby farmer,
Mr. Kôons testified he had made no effort to employ a commercial
equipment firm to do this brief and simple job for him,
Mr. Koons will be required to cease dumping at the site
altogether, since he has demonstrated he lacks the resources to
do so in compliance with the law; to cover or remove the remaining
refuse within two weeks, as that can easily be done; and to pay a
penalty of $100 for his repeated and deliberate violations, This
sum, w~add, would be considerably higher but for his uncontested
assertion of poverty, Any failure to comply with this order will
be subject to penalties more severe.
This opinion constitutes the Board~sfindings of fact and
conclusions of 1aw~
ORDER
1) C~ E~ Koons shall not cause or allow the deposit of refuse
on his property near Flora.
2) C, E. Koons shall either remove from the premises or
cover, in accordance with the Rules and Regulations
for Refuse Disposal Sites and Facilities, all refuse
presently on the site, no later than June 23, 1971,
3) C, E, Koons shall pay to the State of Illinois, on or
before July 13, 1971 the sum of $100 as a penalty for
the violations found the the Board.
I, Regina E, Ryan,
above
Opinion and Order was entered
I —
664