ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 1,
1994
DOROTHY FURLAN AND
)
MICHAEL FURLAN,
)
Complainants,
v.
)
PCB 93—15
(Enforcement)
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
)
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by E. Dunham):
This matter comes before the Board on a complaint filed
January 29, 1993 by Dorothy and Michael Furlan (Complainants).
The complaint alleges that the air conditioners at the University
of Illinois School of Medicine (Respondent) in Rockford, Illinois
emit noise in violation of Sections 23 and 24 of the
Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/23 and 24). In
April, 1994, both parties filed status reports stating that noise
monitoring was to be performed during the air conditioning season
of 1994. In a further status report of July 1, 1994, complainant
stated that the monitoring was scheduled for the first week of
July, 1994.
Results of tests performed by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (Agency) were filed with the Board on July 14,
1994. According to the test results, there were no exceedences
of the numerical standards for noise found at 35 Ill. Adm. Code
901.
Respondent filed a “Motion for Summary Judgment” on August
8, 1994, asserting that the noise level testing indicated that
there were no violations of the numerical standards. No response
to the motion for summary judgment has been filed by the
Complainants.
Section 23 of the Act describes the findings of the General
Assembly concerning excessive noise and the purpose of the title
which is “to prevent noise which creates a public nuisance”. (415
ILCS 5/23.) Section 24 of the Act provides that “njo person
shall emit beyond the boundaries of his property any noise that
unreasonably interferes with the enjoyment of life or with any
lawful business or activity” in violation of any Board
regulation. (415 ILCS 5/24.)
The Board accepts the findings of the Agency as proof that
the noise levels in the complainants’ home do not violate the
Board’s numerical standards for noise. The noise nuisance count
has not been specifically addressed, but pursuant to 35 Ill. Adin.
2
Code 101.241(b), failure to respond to a motion is deemed to be
waiver of any objection to the grant of the motion. Summary
judgment for the respondent is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act, (415 ILCS
5/41 (1992)), provides for appeal of final orders of the Board
within 35 days of the date of service of this order. The Rules
of the Supreme Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
(See also 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.246, Motion for Reconsideration.)
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, ltftreby certify that, the above order was adopted on the
/~‘—
day of
,
1994, by a vote of
Dorothy N.
Illinois
Control Board