ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
13,
1971
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
v.
)
#
PCB
71—28
DANVILLE SANITARY DISTRICT
Supplemental Opinion
& Order of the Board
(by Mr. Currie):
Our May
26 order forbade new connections to the Danville
Sanitary District until measures were taken
to reduce effluent
suspended solids to
a monthly average of 50 mg/i and BOD to
20 mg/l.
The District has taken the prescribed
steps.
From
July
1 to August 10 suspended solids averaged
24 mg/l;
from July
15 through August
4 BOD as measured by an expert consulting
firm averaged
23 mg/i.
These concentrations compare very favor-
ably with average BOD levels
of 92 and suspended solids
of 151
before corrective steps were
taken.
The present suspended
solids
level is much better than required by
the order; the BOD level
is in the right ballpark and
so close
to the required level as
in substance
to comply.
We believe the intent of our order has been met, especially
since the initial figures were
set on the basis of a prediction
from laboratory tests as to the efficiency of the process.
We
commend the District for its prompt and effective
action and we
hold,
in the light of additional information not available
at
the time of our
order, that the District is
in substantial
compliance with the effluent requirements of our order.
The District testified that new sources approximating
1500 P,E. will need connection in the next
10-12 months and that
this quantity can be added,
both organically and hydraulically,
without jeopardizing the maintenance of present effluent levels.
We therefore allow the connection
of new waste sources aggregating
not
in excess of that quantity, except that further connections
shall cease if the monthly average BOD exceeds 30 mg/i or suspended
solids 25 mg/l,
We cannot lift the ban altogether because too
many additions would cause another overload.
In all other
respects
the May
26 order remains
in effect.
The District shall
file
a report three months from this date indicating what
2
—
275
additional connections
have been made and what effluent con-
centrations have been achieved.
At that point the Board will
reexamine the sewer ban auestion in the light of the then
situation.
I, Regina
E.
Ryan, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board,
certify that the Board ~
the ab~upplemental
2
—
276