RECEIVED
CLERK’S
OFF!CE
MAR
 29
 2002
STATE
 OP IWNOIS
R02-l
 Pollution
 Control Board
(Identical-in-Substance
Rulemaking
-
 Land)
RCRA
 SUBTITLE
 C UPDATE,
 USEPA
AMENDMENTS
 (July
 1 through December
31, 2001 and January 22,
 2002)
R02-12
(Identical
-
in-Substance
Rulemaking
-
 Land)
UIC UPDATE,
 USEPA AMENDMENTS
(July
 1,
 2001 through December
31,
 2001)
R02-17
(Identical-in-Substance
Rulemaking
-
 Land)
(Consolidated)
__
 ~
NOTICE
TO:
 Dorothy Gunn,
 Clerk
Illinois Pollution. Control Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago,
 Illinois 60601
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
 that
 I
 have filed with
 the Office
 of
 the
 Clerk
 of
the
 Illinois
 Pollution
 Control
 Board,
 the
 RESPONSE
 OF
 THE
 ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
 PROTECTION AGENCY
 PURSUANT
 TO PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR
PROPOSED
 IDENTICAL-IN-SUBSTANCE
 RULES,
 a
 copy
 of
 which
 is
 herewith
served upon you.
an J
Associat,7Counsel
Division of Legal Counsel
Dated: March18,
 2002
Agency File Number:
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Post Office Box 19276
Springfield,
 Illinois 62794-9276
BEFORE THE
 L
 BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
IN THE MATTER OF:
RCRA SUBTITLE C UPDATE,
 USEPA
AMENDMENTS
 (January
 1,
 2001 through
June
 30,
 2001)
)
)IS ENVIRONMENTAL
ION AGEI~CY,
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
IN
 THE
 MATTER
 OF:
RCRA SUBTITLE
 C UPDATE, USEPA
AMENDMENTS
 (January
 1,
 2001 through
June 30,
 2001)
R02-1
(Identical-in-Substance
Rulemaking
 -
 Land)
RECEIVED
CLEr~pcs
r~r~r?r’~’
MAR
 2
 92002
STATE OF
 ILLINOIS
Pollution Control Board
RCRA SUBTITLE
 C UPDATE, USEPA
AMENDMENTS
 (July
 1 through December
31, 2001 and January 22,
 2002)
R02-12
(Identical-in-Substance
Rulemaking
-
 Land)
UIC UPDATE,
 USEPA AMENDMENTS
(July
 1,
 2001 through December
31, 2001)
)
 R02-17
(Identical-in-Substance
Rulemaking
-
 Land)
(Consolidated)
RESPONSE OF THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PURSUANT TO PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR PROPOSED
IDENTICAL-IN-SUBSTANCE RULES.
NOW COMES
 THE
 ILLINOIS
 ENVIRONMENTAL
 PROTECTION AGENCY,
 (hereinafter
“Agency”),
 by
 and
 through
 one
 of
 its
 attorneys,
 Susan
 J.
 Schroeder,
pursuant
 to
 Section
 7.2
 of
 the
 Environmental
 Protection
 Act
 (“Act”)
with responses
 to proposed amendments
 to the Resource Conservation and
Recovery
 Act
 of
 1976,
 Subtitle
 C
 (RCRA
 Subtitle
 C)
 Hazardous
 Waste
Management regulations at 40 C.F.R.
 260
 et
 seq,
 and to the underground
 injection
 control
 (UIC)
 regulations
 that
 USEPA
 adopted
 to
 implement
Section 1421
 of the federal
 Safe Drinking Water Act
 (SDWA)at
 42 U.S.C.
300h.
The proposed
 regulations were published through
 an order
 of
 the
 Board
dated January 24,
 2002.
 The Agency’s
 comments pursuant
 to the public
comment
 period
 for
 the
 proposed
 identical-in-substance
 rules
 are
included with this filing as Attachments A and B.
Respectfully submitted,
ILLIM IS ENVIRONMENTAL
usan J. Sclfoeder
Associate ~6unse1
Division of Legal Counsel
BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
ATTACHMENT
 A
FEDERAL REGISTER
CITATION
FEDERAL SECTION
AFFECTED
STATE SECTION
AFFECTED
COMMENTS
66 FR 58258
 268.40
 728.Table
 T
 For waste code
 “Kl76
 -
 Mercury”,
 CAS2
No.
 reads as
 “7438-97-6”.
 Field should
be corrected to read as “7439-97-6”.
For waste code
 “1(178
 —
 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin,”
 CAS2
 No.
reads
 as “35822-46-9”. Field should be
corrected to read as “35822-39-4”.
For waste code “HxCDD’s,”
 CAS2
 No.
 does
not appear in State Rule.
For waste code “HxCDF’s,”
 CAS2
 No.
 does
not appear
 in State Rule.
Omitted
 entry
 in
 State
 Rule
 for
l,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzofuran.
For
 waste
 code
 “PeCDD’s,”
 CAS2
 No.
 does
not
 appear
 in
 State
 Rule.
For waste code
 “PeCDF’s,”
 CAS2 No.
 does
not
 appear
 in
 State
 Rule.
For waste
 code
 “TCDD’s,”
 CAS2
 No.
 does
not
 appear
 in
 State
 Rule.
For waste
 code
 “TCDF’s,”
 CAS2
 No.
 does
not appear in State Rule.
For
 waste
 code
 “Thallium,”
 the
 non-
wastewater concentration limit does
 not
appear in the State rule.
 Language
 in
the
 Federal
 rule
 indicates
 that
 a
concentration
 limit
 of
 0.20
 mg/L
 TCLP
has been established.
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
ATTACHMENT
 B
1.
 The Agency would like
 to thank the Board
 for
 its quick action
 in
response
 to
 the
 amendments
 to
 the
 federal
 corrective
 action
management unit
 (“CAMU”)
 regulations adopted by the United States
Environmental
 Protection
 Agency
 (“USEPA”)
 on
 January
 22,
 2002.
The
 Agency
 respectfully
 reiterates
 its
 request
 that
 the
 Board
complete
 this
 rulemaking
 by
 April
 22,
 2002,
 at least with respect
to
 the
 CAMU
 regulation
 amendments,
 so
 the
 Agency
 can
 obtain
interim authorization by rule for those amendments.
2.
 The
 Board
 requests
 comments
 on
 the
 text
 and location
 of
 Board
Notes
 proposed
 in
 response
 to
 its
 review
 of
 Battery
 Recyclers,
Inc.
 v.
 EPA,
 208
 F.3d
 1047
 (D.C.
 Cir.
 2000)
a.
 Regarding
 the
 Board
 Note
 proposed
 for
 Sections
 728.124(a)
and
 728.134(a),
 the
 Agency
 agrees
 with
 the
 text
 of
 the
note.
 Since
 the
 Board’s
 adoption
 of
 the
 proposed
 Board
Note,
 the
 USEPA,
 in
 response
 to
 Battery
 Recyclers,
 amended
40
 C.F.R.
 §
 261.24(a)
 to
 exclude
 manufactured
 gas
 plant
waste
 from
 the
 Toxicity
 Characteristic
 Leaching
 Procedure
requirement
 of that Section.
 See
 67 Fed.
 Reg.
 11251
 (March
13,
 2002)
.
 Because
 the
 USEPA
 amended
 only
 40
 C.F.R.
 §
261.24(a),
 it
 appears
 that
 Section
 728.134(a),
 the
corresponding Board regulation,
 is
 the proper location for
the
 Board
 Note.
b.
 The Board
 also
 proposes
 the
 addition
 of
 a
 Board
 Note
 to
Sections
 721.102(c) (3)
 and
 721.104(a) (17).
 The
 Agency
notes
 that
 the
 USEPA’s
 recent
 rulemaking
 also
 amended
 40
C.F.R.
 §~
 261.2(c)
 (3)
 and
 261.4(a)
 (17)
 in
 response
 to
Battery Recyclers,
 the
 federal
 regulations
 corresponding
 to
Sections
 721.102(c)
 (3)
 and
 721.104(a)
 (17)
 of
 the
 Board’s
regulations.
3.
 The Board proposes
 to
 change Section 724.654(g)
 so
 the
 first
sentence reads
 as follows:
 “Staging piles
are
 subject
 to land
disposal
 restrictions
 and
 federal
 minimum
 technological
requirements.”
 This
 language
 conflicts
 with
 the
 deleted
language
 it
 replaces,
 as
 well
 as
 the
 remainder
 of
 the
paragraph.
 A
 “not”
 should
 be
 added
 to
 the
 sentence
 so
 it
reads
 as
 follows:
 “Staging
 piles
 are
 not
 subject
 to
 land
disposal
 restrictions
 and
 federal
 minimum
 technological
requirements.”
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
STATE
 OF
 ILLINOIS
COUNTY
 OF
 SANGAMON
PROOF
 OF
 SERVICE
I,
 the
 undersigned,
 on
 oath
 state
 that
 I
 have
 served
 the
 attached
NOTICE
 and
 RESPONSE
 OF
 THE
 ILLINOIS
 ENVIRONMENTAL
 PROTECTION
 AGENCY
PURSUANT
 TO
 PUBLIC COMMENT
 PERIOD
 FOR PROPOSED
 IDENTICAL-IN-SUBSTANCE
RULES
 upon
 the
 person
 to
 whom
 it
 is
 directed,
 by placing
 a copy in an
envelope addressed to:
Dorothy Gunn,
 Clerk
Pollution Control Board
100
 West
 Randolph
 Street
Suite
 11-500
Chicago,
 Illinois
 60601
(FEDERAL
 EXPRESS)
and
 mailing
 it
 from
 Springfield,
 Illinois
 on
 March
 28,
 2002,
 with
sufficient postage affixed.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
this
 28th
 day of March, 2002.
Notary Public
X
 OFFICIAL
 SEAL
*
 BRENDA BOEHNER
 Z
*
NOTARY
 PUBLIC,
 STATE
 OF
 ILLINOIS
~:
:!.MY
 COMMISSION
 EXPIRES
 11.14.2OO5~:
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER