ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March 7, 2002
     
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    )
    )
    WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT ) R02-9
    UPDATE, USEPA AMENDMENTS ) (Identical-in-Substance
    (October 3, 2001)
    ) Rulemaking - Public Water Supply)
     
    Adopted Rule. Final Order.
     
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by N.J. Melas):
     
    The Board received a motion for expedited consideration from the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency (Agency) and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater
    Chicago (MWRDGC) on October 31, 2001. By that motion, the Agency and the MWRDGC
    requested that the Board expedite consideration of certain amendments adopted by United States
    Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on October 3, 2001. Those federal amendments are
    intended to implement the federal Project eXellence and Leadership (Project XL). The joint
    motion requested that the Board incorporate the October 3, 2001 federal amendments into the
    wastewater pretreatment amendments proposed by the Board in Wastewater Pretreatment
    Update, USEPA Amendments (January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001), R02-3 (Oct. 4, 2001).
     
    In its November 15, 2001 opinion and order, the Board granted this request and proposed
    corresponding amendments to the Illinois wastewater pretreatment regulations. A Notice of
    Proposed Amendments appeared in the November 30, 2001 issue of the
    Illinois Register
    , at 25
    Ill. Reg. 15365. The public comment period would have expired after 45 days, on January 14,
    2002. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) filed comments on January 14,
    2002. However, on January 24, 2002, the Board granted the January 11, 2002 request from
    USEPA that it be allowed to file comments until February 15, 2002. USEPA filed its comments
    on February 15, 2002.
     
    In this opinion and order, the Board adopts as final amendments based on the October 3,
    2001 federal amendments. In response to the Agency and USEPA comments that portions of the
    Board’s proposal were not truly “identical-in-substance” to the USEPA rules, the Board has
    deleted a segment of the rule proposed as 35 Ill. Adm. Code 310.930(b).
     
    Under Sections 7.2 and 13.3 of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/7.2
    and 13.3 (2000)), the Board today proposes amendments to the Illinois regulations that are
    “identical in substance” to wastewater pretreatment regulations that the USEPA adopted to
    implement Sections 307(b), (c), and (d) and 402(b)(8) and (b)(9) of the federal Water Pollution
    Control Act (FWPCA) (33 U.S.C. §§ 1317(b), (c), and (d) and 1342(b)(8) and (b)(9) (1994)).
    The federal action that underlies this docket includes the federal wastewater pretreatment
    amendments that USEPA adopted on October 3, 2001.
     

     
    2
    Sections 7.2 and 13.3 provide for quick adoption of regulations that are identical in
    substance to federal wastewater pretreatment regulations that USEPA adopts to implement
    Sections 307(b), (c), and (d) and 402(b)(8) and (b)(9) of the FWPCA. Section 13.3 also provides
    that Title VII of the Act and Section 5 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 ILCS
    100/5-35 and 5-40 (2000)) do not apply to the Board’s adoption of identical-in-substance
    regulations. The federal wastewater pretreatment regulations are found at 40 C.F.R. 400 through
    499.
     
    The Board will promptly file these amendments with the Office of the Secretary of State.
     
    THE FEDERAL ACTION CONSIDERED IN THIS RULEMAKING
     
    On October 3, 2001 (at 66 Fed. Reg. 50334), USEPA amended the federal wastewater
    pretreatment regulations to facilitate its Project XL. Project XL allows the imposition of
    alternative requirements to the generally applicable environmental regulations for the sake of
    achieving greater environmental benefits by alternative means. The specific October 3, 2001
    Project XL action incorporated a new provision in the federal wastewater pretreatment
    regulations that would allow the State to issue permits that relax the generally applicable
    regulations in favor of imposing alternative requirements that would confer greater
    environmental benefits than would compliance with the generally applicable rules. USEPA
    undertook the October 3, 2001 Project XL action for the immediate benefit of five publicly
    owned treatment works (POTWs), including the MWRDGC, which is regulated under the
    Illinois wastewater pretreatment program.
    1
    The new provision added to the federal regulations,
    however, is drafted broadly enough that it would apply to other POTWs in the future.
     
    PUBLIC COMMENTS
     
    The Board adopted a proposal for public comment in this matter on November 15, 2001.
    A Notice of Proposed Amendments appeared in the November 30, 2001 issue of the
    Illinois
    Register
    , at 25 Ill. Reg. 15365. The public comment period would have expired on January 14,
    2002, but the Board extended the public comment period until February 14, 2002 based on the
    January 11, 2002 request of USEPA. The Board received public comments on this proposal until
    February 15, 2002. During the comment period, the Board received the following two public
    comments:
     
    PC 1 Connie Tonsor, Associate Counsel, Special Assistant Attorney General, Division
    of Legal Counsel, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (received January
    14, 2002)
     
    PC 2 David A Ullrich, Deputy Regional Administrator, United States Environmental
    Protection Agency (received February 15, 2002)
     
    1
    The other four POTWs are the following: The Narragansett Bay Commission in Rhode Island,
    the Jeffersontown Wastewater Treatment Plant in Kentucky, the City of Albuquerque, New
    Mexico, and the City of Denton, Texas.

     
    3
    Both the Agency (by PC 1) and USEPA (by PC 2) requested that the Board change the
    proposal by removing proposed subsection (b). The comments received and the Board’s
    response are described below in the discussion of the amendments.
     
    DISCUSSION
     
    The Board incorporated the October 3, 2001 federal amendments to the wastewater
    pretreatment regulations into the Illinois wastewater pretreatment regulations with minimal
    deviation from the federal text. Persons interested in the substance of the underlying federal
    action should refer to the notice that appeared in the October 3, 2001 issue of the
    Federal
    Register
    . This discussion considers only incorporating the federal Project XL provision into the
    Illinois regulations. The Board has found it necessary to deviate from the text of the federal
    regulations, and this discussion focuses on those deviations.
     
    The first addition to the federal text is the addition of a definition of “Project XL” to the
    Illinois regulations. We added this definition to Section 310.110, the centralized body of
    definitions intended for use with the wastewater pretreatment regulations. To define “Project
    XL” the Board referred to the federal “Project for eXcellence and Leadership” and facility-based
    and community-based regulatory reinvention projects as described in the two
    Federal Register
     
    notices that announced initiation of the federal program. On May 23, 1995, at 60 Fed. Reg.
    27282, USEPA announced the program for facility-based projects, and on November 1, 1995, at
    60 Fed. Reg. 55569, USEPA announced expansion of the program to include community-based
    projects. The definition refers to both
    Federal Register
    notices. The Board invites comment on
    our added definition of “Project XL.”
     
    A second deviation from the federal text relates to the structural changes made in
    adapting 40 C.F.R. 403 into the Illinois rules at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 310. Many of the federal
    provisions have been divided into several Sections in the Illinois regulations. Often, a single
    federal provision equates to a Subpart of Part 310 of the Illinois rules. In codifying the new
    Project XL-related federal provision, 40 C.F.R. 403.20, the Board has modified the federal text
    to make the rule conform to this existing codification scheme. The Board has codified new 40
    C.F.R. 403.20 as a single Section, 35 Ill. Adm. Code 310.930, but placed it in a new Subpart L,
    pertaining to federal Project XL agreements.
     
    A less desireable alternative was to place this new Section in existing Subpart K, which
    currently includes a few Sections based on 40 C.F.R. 403.18, relating to modification of
    pretreatment programs. This alternative, however, would have required deviation from the
    existing structure of the Part 310, and it could lead to confusion of the two distinct subject
    matters of existing Subpart K and Section 310.930. The Board requested comments on our
    creation of a new Subpart L for new Section 310.930, and none of the comments objected to this
    aspect of the proposal.
     
    A third set of deviations from the federal text relates to the structure of the rule. The
    Board has divided the federal text into a preamble and two subsections, (a) and (b). We believe
    that this division enhances the clarity of the text by separating the general ability of the Agency
    to issue permits based on Project XL agreements (in the preamble), the requirement for the

     
    4
    POTW to submit alternative requirements as a substantial program modification (in subsection
    (a)), and the requirement for inclusion of a reopener clause in the permit (in subsection (b)). The
    Board invited comment on our division of the federally derived text into three segments to
    enhance the clarity of the rule, and none of the comments objected to this aspect of the proposal.
     
    Objections to and Deletion of Section 310.930(b)
     
    In this opinion and order the Board is eliminating a fourth set of deviations from the text
    of 40 C.F.R. 403.20 that appeared in the November 15, 2001 proposal for public comment.
    Those related to differences in the federal and Illinois regulatory schemes. The Board is
    eliminating that fourth set of deviations from the text of the federal rule in response to the
    comments from the Agency and USEPA. Despite the elimination of these deviations, the Board
    explains this set of amendments and considers the comments received in this segment of this
    opinion.
     
    At the federal level, one agency, USEPA, establishes general regulations, issues
    environmental permits, and grants exceptions or variances from the generally applicable rules.
    In Illinois, these functions are divided between the Agency and the Board. The Board
    establishes the Illinois environmental standards and grants variances or adjusted standards from
    those standards. 415 ILCS 5/5 (1998). The Agency issues all environmental permits and
    participates directly with USEPA to resolve issues relating to the implementation of federal
    programs in Illinois. 415 ILCS 5/4 (1998). Basically, this means that although the Agency
    participates with USEPA in the development of any Project XL agreement relating to an Illinois
    facility, which confers relief from the federal wastewater pretreatment requirements, the Board
    must grant any necessary relief from the Illinois regulations that may be needed to implement
    that Project XL agreement.
     
    The Act establishes the mechanisms that the Board must use to grant regulatory relief.
    These are by rulemaking (415 ILCS 5/27 and 28 (1998)), by an adjusted standard (415 ILCS
    5/28.1 (1998)), or by a variance (415 ILCS 5/35 through 28 (1998)). In order for the
    implementation of a Project XL agreement to occur in accordance with Illinois law, the Board
    must grant one form of this relief or another from any regulation that would stand as an
    impediment to that implementation. For this reason, in the proposal for public comment the
    Board had conditioned the authority of the Agency to authorize alternative requirements on
    fulfillment of the requirements of an added subsection (b).
     
    Subsection (b), as proposed, essentially provided for prior Board approval of a Project
    XL agreement before the Agency and the affected POTW may proceed to implement the
    agreement. In this provision, the Board differentiated between the Project XL agreement
    involving the MWRDGC, which USEPA has essentially endorsed by rule, and any subsequent
    Project XL agreements for which such federal approval by rule is unlikely. In proposed
    subsection (b)(1) the Board approved (using the identical-in-substance rulemaking authority) to
    the August 30, 2001 agreement among the Agency, USEPA, and MWRDGC that prompted this
    action. In proposed subsection (b)(2) the Board provided for Board approval of any subsequent
    Project XL agreements by alternative means.
     

     
    5
    The Board invited comment on proposed Section 310.930(b)(1) and (b)(2). USEPA and
    the Agency both submitted adverse comments on the proposal. Those comments have caused
    the Board to eliminate proposed subsection (b) in its entirety and make other corresponding
    changes in the text of this Section to reflect the removal. Thus, proposed subsections (a)(1) and
    (a)(2) have become subsections (a) and (b), respectively, in the adopted amendments, and
    subsection (b), which included proposed subsections (b)(1) and (b)(2), has been removed.
     
    In PC 1, the Agency asserted that the Board exhibited a misunderstanding of the Project
    XL process in the pretreatment area. The Agency further observed that the Board appeared to
    position itself to review USEPA actions. The Agency further criticized the proposal in that it
    elevated the Project XL agreement to the status of an enforceable agreement, while the
    agreement itself provides that it is not enforceable against any party.
     
    In PC 2, USEPA similarly criticizes the addition of proposed subsection (b) as making
    the rule not identical-in-substance to the corresponding federal rule. USEPA acknowledged that
    states may need to modify their regulations or statutes to allow for implementation of Project XL
    agreements, but took issue with the fact that proposed subsection (b) would have required the
    Board to grant relief from the Illinois regulations based on any future Project XL agreement.
     
    In response to the comments from USEPA and the Agency, proposed subsection (b) has
    been removed from the text of the amendments as adopted.
     
    General Revisions and Deviations from the Federal Text
     
    The following discussion begins with a description of the types of deviations the Board
    makes from the literal text of federal regulations in adopting identical-in-substance rules. It is
    followed by a discussion of the amendments and actions undertaken in direct response to the
    federal actions involved in this proceeding. This first series of discussions is organized by
    federal subject matter, generally appearing in chronological order of the relevant
    Federal
    Register
    notices involved. Finally, this discussion closes with a description of the amendments
    and actions that are not directly derived from the federal actions.
     
    In incorporating the federal rules into the Illinois system, some deviation from the federal
    text is unavoidable. This deviation arises primarily through differences between the federal and
    state regulatory structure and systems. Some deviation also arises through errors in and
    problems with the federal text itself. The Board conforms the federal text to the Illinois rules
    and regulatory scheme and corrects errors that we see in the text as we engage in these routine
    update rulemakings.
     
    In addition to the amendments derived from federal amendments, the Board often finds it
    necessary to alter the text of various passages of the existing rules as provisions are opened for
    update in response to USEPA actions. This involves correcting deficiencies, clarifying
    provisions, and making other changes that are necessary to establish a clear set of rules that
    closely parallel the corresponding federal requirements within the codification scheme of the
    Illinois Administrative Code.
     

     
    6
    The Board updates the citations to the
    Code of Federal Regulations
    to the most recent
    version available. As of the date of this opinion, the most recent version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    available to the Board is the July 1, 2000 version. Thus, we have updated all
    citations to the 2000 version, adding references to later amendments using their appropriate
    Federal Register
    citation, where necessary.
     
    The Board has assembled a table to aid in the location of these alterations and to briefly
    outline their intended purpose. The table sets forth the miscellaneous corrections to the pre-
    amended base text of the rules in detail. The table is set forth and explained beginning on the
    next page of this opinion and order. There is no further discussion of most of the deviations and
    revisions elsewhere in this opinion.
     
    Discussion of Miscellaneous Housekeeping Amendments
     
    The tables below list numerous corrections and amendments that are not based on current
    federal amendments. The first table (beginning immediately below) includes deviations made in
    this Proposal for Public Comment from the verbatim text of the federal amendments. The
    second table (beginning below at page 7) contains corrections and clarifications that the Board
    made in the base text involved in this proposal. The amendments listed in this second table are
    not directly derived from the current federal amendments. Some of the entries in these tables are
    discussed further in appropriate segments of the general discussion beginning at page 4 of this
    opinion. Table 3 (beginning on page 11 below) is a listing of revisions made to the text of the
    amendments from that proposed and set forth in the Board’s opinion and order of November 15,
    2001. Table 3 indicates the changes made, as well as the source that suggested each of the
    changes.
     
    Table 1:
    Deviations from the Text of the Federal Amendments
     
    Illinois Section
    40 C.F.R. Section
    Revision(s)
    310.930 preamble
    403.20
    Added the precondition “once the POTW
    . . .”; changed “approval authority” to
    “Agency”; added parenthetical “by a
    permit. . . . the Act” offset by commas;
    changed “publicly owned treatment works
    (POTW)” to the defined abbreviation
    “POTW”; removed the quotation marks
    from the defined term, “Project XL”;
    added the precondition “approved under
    subsection (b)”; removed unnecessary
    capitalization from pretreatment program”
    310.930(a)
    403.20
    Subdivided the text and added the
    subsection designation; changed
    “§ 403.18” to “Subpart K of this Part”;
    added “before the POTW may implement
    it”

     
    7
    310.930(b)
    403.20
    Subdivided the text and added the
    subsection designation; changed
    “approval authority” to “Agency” (twice);
    used lower-case “local pilot pretreatment
    program”; added “embodied in the Project
    XL agreement”; removed the quotation
    marks from the defined term, “Project
    XL”; added “pursuant to its own terms”
     
    Table2 :
    Board Housekeeping Amendments
     
    Section Source
    Revision(s)
    310. table of contents
    Board
    Added new Subpart L designation
    310.110 “Act”
    Board
    Changed the Illinois Revised Statutes citation to the
    Illinois Compiled Statutes citation
    310.110 “Approval
    Authority” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “approved
    POTW pretreatment
    program” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “approved
    POTW pretreatment
    program”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause
    310.110 “authorization
    to discharge”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause
    310.110 “blowdown”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “CWA”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “indirect
    discharge” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “industrial
    user”
    Board
    Removed the quotation marks from the subsequent
    appearance of the defined term, “industrial user”; added
    “the person” to complete the sentence in each
    paragraph subdivision (six times); changed the ending
    periods to semicolons (five times); used lower case for
    the conjunction “or” and deleted the ending comma
    310.110 “industrial
    user” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available

     
    8
    310.110 “interference”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause; changed “both” to “for which both of the
    following is true”; added “the discharge” (three times);
    changed “therefore” to “as a result of the inhibition of
    disruption” as a parenthetical offset by a comma;
    removed the quotation marks from the term, “sludge
    requirements”
    310.110 “interference”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “new source”
    Board
    Removed the quotation marks from the term, “new
    source”
    310.110 “new source”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “noncontact
    cooling water”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause
    310.110 “noncontact
    cooling water” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “noncontact
    cooling water
    pollutants” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “NPDES
    permit” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “pass
    through”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause
    310.110 “pass
    through” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “person”
    Board
    Added a comma to separate the final element of a series
    310.110 “person”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “pollutant”
    Board
    Changed commas to semicolons to separate the
    elements of a series containing a sub-series (15 times);
    added a semicolon to separate the final element of a
    series containing a sub-series; added a comma to
    separate the final element of a series
    310.110 “pollutant”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “pollution”
    Board
    Added a comma to separate the final element of a series
    310.110 “pollution”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “POTW
    treatment plant”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause
    310.110 “POTW
    treatment plant” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available

     
    9
    310.110
    “pretreatment”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause
    310.110
    “pretreatment” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “pretreatment
    permit”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause
    310.110 “pretreatment
    requirements” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “pretreatment
    standard”
    Board
    Added a comma to separate the final element of a
    series; changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive
    relative clause
    310.110 “pretreatment
    standard” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “process
    wastewater”
    Board
    Changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive relative
    clause
    310.110 “process
    wastewater” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “process
    wastewater pollutants”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “Project XL”
    Board
    Added the definition of the term “Project XL”
    310.110 “publicly
    owned treatment
    works”
    Board
    Added a comma to separate the final element of a series
    (twice); changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive
    relative clause (twice)
    310.110 “publicly
    owned treatment
    works” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “schedule of
    compliance” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “significant
    industrial user”
    Board
    Added a comma to separate the final element of a
    series; changed “which” to “that” for a restrictive
    relative clause
    310.110 “significant
    industrial user” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “sludge
    requirements” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “submission”
    Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available

     
    10
    310.110 “treatment
    works”
    Board
    Added a comma to separate the final element of a series
    (twice)
    310.110 “treatment
    works” Board note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.110 “unit of local
    government”
    Board
    Removed the quotation marks from the subsequent
    appearance of the defined term, “industrial user”
    310.110 “unit of local
    government” Board
    note
    Board
    Updated the cited version of the
    Code of Federal
    Regulations
    to the latest edition available
    310.Subpart L
    Board
    Added the new Subpart heading
     
    Table 3:
    Revisions to the Text of the Proposed Amendments in Final Adoption
     
    Section Revised
    Source(s) of
    Revision(s)
    Revision(s)
    310 table of contents
    Section 310.930
    heading
    Board
    Changed “federally-approved” to “federally
    approved”
    310.930 heading
    Board
    Changed “federally-approved” to “federally
    approved”
    310.930 preamble
    Board,
    USEPA,
    Agency
    Changed “fulfilled the requirements of subsection (b)
    of this Section” to “entered into a federally approved
    pretreatment program reinvention pilot project under
    Project XL”; changed “any” to “that”; removed “that
    has a final Project XL agreement approved under
    Subsection (b)”
    310.930(a) Board,
    USEPA,
    Agency
    Renumbered the subsection from subsection (a)(1) to
    reflect the deletion of proposed subsection (b)
    310.930(b) Board,
    USEPA,
    Agency
    Renumbered the subsection from subsection (a)(2) to
    reflect the deletion of proposed subsection (b)
    310.930 Board note
    Board
    Added a reference to the federal provision from which
    this Section derives and referencing the Project XL
    agreement relating to the MWRDGC
     
    ORDER
     
    The complete text of the proposed amendments follows:
     
    TITLE 35: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    SUBTITLE C: WATER POLLUTION
    CHAPTER I: POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
     

     
    11
    PART 310
    PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
     
    SUBPART A: GENERAL PROVISIONS
    Section
    310.101 Applicability
    310.102 Objectives
    310.103 Federal Law
    310.104 State Law
    310.105 Confidentiality
    310.107 Incorporations by Reference
    310.110 Definitions
    310.111 New Source
     
    SUBPART B: PRETREATMENT STANDARDS
    Section
    310.201 General Prohibitions
    310.202 Specific Prohibitions
    310.210 Specific Limits Developed by POTW
    310.211 Local Limits
    310.220 Categorical Standards
    310.221 Category Determination Request
    310.222 Deadline for Compliance with Categorical Standards
    310.230 Concentration and Mass Limits
    310.232 Dilution
    310.233 Combined Wastestream Formula
     
    SUBPART C: REMOVAL CREDITS
    Section
    310.301 Special Definitions
    310.302 Authority
    310.303 Conditions for Authorization to Grant Removal Credits
    310.310 Calculation of Revised Discharge Limits
    310.311 Demonstration of Consistent Removal
    310.312 Provisional Credits
    310.320 Compensation for Overflow
    310.330 Exception to POTW Pretreatment Program
    310.340 Application for Removal Credits Authorization
    310.341 Agency Review
    310.343 Assistance of POTW
    310.350 Continuation of Authorization
    310.351 Modification or Withdrawal of Removal Credits
     
    SUBPART D: PRETREATMENT PERMITS
    Section
    310.400 Preamble

     
    12
    310.401 Pretreatment Permits
    310.402 Time to Apply
    310.403 Imminent Endangerment
    310.410 Application
    310.411 Certification of Capacity
    310.412 Signatures
    310.413 Site Visit
    310.414 Completeness
    310.415 Time Limits
    310.420 Standard for Issuance
    310.421 Final Action
    310.430 Conditions
    310.431 Duration of Permits
    310.432 Schedules of Compliance
    310.441 Effect of a Permit
    310.442 Modification
    310.443 Revocation
    310.444 Appeal
     
    SUBPART E: POTW PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
    Section
    310.501 Pretreatment Programs Required
    310.502 Deadline for Program Approval
    310.503 Incorporation of Approved Programs in Permits
    310.504 Incorporation of Compliance Schedules in Permits
    310.505 Reissuance or Modification of Permits
    310.510 Pretreatment Program Requirements
    310.521 Program Approval
    310.522 Contents of Program Submission
    310.524 Content of Removal Allowance Submission
    310.531 Agency Action
    310.532 Defective Submission
    310.533 Water Quality Management
    310.541 Deadline for Review
    310.542 Public Notice and Hearing
    310.543 Agency Decision
    310.544 USEPA Objection
    310.545 Notice of Decision
    310.546 Public Access to Submission
    310.547 Appeal
     
    SUBPART F: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
    Section
    310.601 Definition of Control Authority
    310.602 Baseline Report
    310.603 Compliance Schedule

     
    13
    310.604 Report on Compliance with Deadline
    310.605 Periodic Reports on Compliance
    310.606 Notice of Potential Problems
    310.610 Monitoring and Analysis
    310.611 Requirements for Non-Categorical Standard Users
    310.612 Annual POTW Reports
    310.613 Notification of Changed Discharge
    310.621 Compliance Schedule for POTW’s
    310.631 Signatory Requirements for Industrial User Reports
    310.632 Signatory Requirements for POTW Reports
    310.633 Fraud and False Statements
    310.634 Recordkeeping Requirements
    310.635 Notification of Discharge of Hazardous Waste
     
    SUBPART G: FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FACTORS
    Section
    310.701 Definition of Requester
    310.702 Purpose and Scope
    310.703 Criteria
    310.704 Fundamentally Different Factors
    310.705 Factors which are Not Fundamentally Different
    310.706 More Stringent State Law
    310.711 Application Deadline
    310.712 Contents of FDF Request
    310.713 Deficient Requests
    310.714 Public Notice
    310.721 Agency Review of FDF Requests
    310.722 USEPA Review of FDF Requests
     
    SUBPART H: ADJUSTMENTS FOR POLLUTANTS IN INTAKE
    Section
    310.801 Net/Gross Calculation by USEPA
     
    SUBPART I: UPSETS
    Section
    310.901 Definition
    310.902 Effect of an Upset
    310.903 Conditions Necessary for an Upset
    310.904 Burden of Proof
    310.905 Reviewability of Claims of Upset
    310.906 User Responsibility in Case of Upset
     
    SUBPART J: BYPASS
    Section
    310.910 Definition
    310.911 Bypass Not Violating Applicable Pretreatment Standards or Requirements

     
    14
    310.912 Notice
    310.913 Prohibition of Bypass
     
    SUBPART K: MODIFICATION OF POTW PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
    Section
    310.920 General
    310.921 Substantial Modifications Defined
    310.922 Approval Procedures for Substantial Modifications
    310.923 Approval Procedures for Non-Substantial Modifications
    310.924 Incorporation of Modifications into the Permit
    310.930 Federally-Approved Pretreatment Program Reinvention Pilot Projects Under
    Project XL
     
    SUBPART L: FEDERAL PROJECT XL AGREEMENTS
    Section
    310.930 Federally Approved Pretreatment Program Reinvention Pilot Projects Under
    Project XL
     
    AUTHORITY: Implementing and authorized by Sections 7.2, 13, 13.3, and 27 of the
    Environmental Protection Act [415 ILCS 5/7.2, 13, 13.3 and 27].
     
    SOURCE: Adopted in R86-44 at 12 Ill. Reg. 2502, effective January 13, 1988; amended in R88-
    18 at 13 Ill. Reg. 2463, effective January 31, 1989; amended in R89-3 at 13 Ill. Reg. 19243,
    effective November 27, 1989; amended in R89-12 at 14 Ill. Reg. 7608, effective May 8, 1990;
    amended in R91-5 at 16 Ill. Reg. 7346, effective April 27, 1992; amended in R95-22 at 20 Ill.
    Reg. 5533, effective April 1, 1996; amended in R96-12 at 20 Ill. Reg. 10671, effective July 24,
    1996; amended in R97-7 at 21 Ill. Reg. 5163, effective April 10, 1997; amended in R98-23 at 22
    Ill. Reg. 11465, effective June 22, 1998; amended in R99-17 at 23 Ill. Reg. 8412, effective July
    12, 1999; amended in R00-7 at 24 Ill. Reg. 2372, effective January 26, 2000; amended in R00-15
    at 24 Ill. Reg. 11633, effective July 24, 2000; amended in R01-5 at 25 Ill. Reg. 1322, effective
    January 11, 2001; amended in R01-25 at 25 Ill. Reg. 10860, effective August 14, 2001; amended
    in R02-3 at 26 Ill. Reg. 4008, effective February 28, 2002; amended in R02-9 at 26 Ill. Reg.
    ________, effective ______________________.
     
    SUBPART A: GENERAL PROVISIONS
     
    Section 310.110 Definitions
     
    “Act” means the Environmental Protection Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 111 1/2,
    par. 1001 et seq.) [415 ILCS 5].
     
    “Agency” means the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
     
    “Approval Authority” means the Agency.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(c) (1991) (2000).
     

     
    15
    “Approved POTW Pretreatment Program” or “Program” or “POTW Pretreatment
    Program” means a program administered by a POTW which that has been
    approved by the Agency in accordance with Sections 310.541 through 310.546.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(d) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Authorization to discharge” means an authorization issued to an industrial user
    by a POTW which that has an approved pretreatment program. The authorization
    may consist of a permit, license, ordinance or other mechanism as specified in the
    approved pretreatment program.
     
    “Blowdown” means the minimum discharge of recirculating water for the purpose
    of discharging materials contained in the water, the further buildup of which
    would cause concentration in amounts exceeding limits established by best
    engineering practice.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(p) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Board” means the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
     
    “CWA” means Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean
    Water Act, as amended, incorporated by reference in Section 310.107.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(b) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Control authority” is as defined in Section 310.601.
     
    “Indirect Discharge” or “Discharge” means the introduction of pollutants into a
    POTW from any non-domestic source regulated under Section 307(b), (c) or (d)
    of the CWA (33 U.S.C. 1317(b), (c) or (d)).
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(g) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Industrial User” or “User” means a source of indirect discharge. As used in this
    Part, an “industrial user” includes any person who meets any of the following
    criteria:
     
    Discharges The person discharges toxic pollutants as defined by 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 307.1005.;
     
    Is The person is subject to a categorical standard adopted or incorporated
    by reference in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 307.;
     
    Discharges The person discharges more than 15% of the total hydraulic
    flow received by the POTW treatment plant.;
     
    Discharges The person discharges more than 15% of the total biological
    loading of the POTW treatment plant as measured by the 5-day
    biochemical oxygen demand.;
     

     
    16
    Has The person has caused pass through or interference. Or,; or
     
    Has The person has presented an imminent endangerment to the health or
    welfare of persons.
     
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(h) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Industrial wastewater” means waste of a liquid nature discharged by an
    industrial user to a sewer tributary to a POTW.
     
    “Interference” means a discharge which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge
    or discharges from other sources, for which both of the following is true:
     
    Inhibits The discharge inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment
    processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use or disposal; and
     
    Therefore As a result of the inhibition of disruption, the discharge is a
    cause of a violation of any requirement of the POTW's NPDES permit
    (including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation) or of
    the prevention of sewage sludge disposal in compliance with any “sludge
    requirements.”
     
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(i) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Municipal sewage” is sewage treated by a POTW exclusive of its industrial
    component.
     
    “Municipal sludge” is sludge produced by a POTW treatment works.
     
    “Municipality.” See “unit of local government.”
     
    “New source” means “new source” as defined in Section 310.111.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(c) and 403.3(k) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Noncontact cooling water” means water used for cooling which that does not
    come into direct contact with any raw material, intermediate product, waste
    product or finished product.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(n) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Noncontact cooling water pollutants” means pollutants present in noncontact
    cooling waters.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(o) (1991) (2000).
     
    “NPDES Permit” means a permit issued to a POTW pursuant to Section 402 of
    the CWA, or Section 12(f) of the Act and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 309.Subpart A.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(l) (1991) (2000).

     
    17
     
    “O and M” means operation and maintenance.
     
    “Pass through” means a discharge of pollutants which that exits the POTW into
    waters of the State in quantities or concentrations which, alone or in conjunction
    with a discharge or discharges from other sources, is a cause of a violation of any
    requirement of the POTW's NPDES permit (including an increase in the
    magnitude or duration of a violation).
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(n) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Person” means an individual, corporation, partnership, association, State, “unit
    of local government” or any interstate body. This term includes the United States
    government, the State of Illinois, and their political subdivisions.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(m) (1991) (2000) and 33 U.S.C.
    1362(5).
     
    “Pollutant” means dredged spoil,; solid waste,; incinerator residue,; sewage,;
    garbage,; sewage sludge,; munitions,; chemical wastes,; biological materials,;
    radioactive materials,; heat,; wrecked or discarded equipment,; rock,; sand,; cellar
    dirt; and industrial, municipal, and agricultural waste discharged into a sewer.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(f) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Pollution” means the man-made or man-induced alteration of the chemical,
    physical, biological, and radiological integrity of water.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(g) (1991) (2000).
     
    “POTW” means “Publicly Owned Treatment Works,” which is defined below.
     
    “POTW Treatment Plant” means that portion of the POTW which that is designed
    to provide treatment (including recycling and reclamation) of municipal sewage
    and industrial wastewater.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(p) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Pretreatment” means the reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination
    of pollutants or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater
    prior to or in lieu of discharging or otherwise introducing such pollutants into a
    POTW. The reduction or alteration may be obtained by physical, chemical or
    biological processes, process changes or by other means, except as prohibited by
    Section 310.232. Appropriate pretreatment technology includes control
    equipment, such as equalization tanks or facilities, for protection against surges or
    slug loadings which that might interfere with or otherwise be incompatible with
    the POTW. However, where wastewater from a regulated process is mixed in an
    equalization facility with unregulated wastewater or with wastewater from
    another regulated process, the effluent from the equalization facility must meet an
    adjusted pretreatment limit calculated in accordance with Section 310.233.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(q) (1991) (2000).

     
    18
     
    “Pretreatment permit” means an authorization to discharge to a sewer which that
    is issued by the Agency as the control authority.
     
    “Pretreatment requirements” means any substantive or procedural requirement
    related to pretreatment, other than a pretreatment standard, imposed on an
    industrial user.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(r) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Pretreatment standard,” or “standard” means any regulation containing pollutant
    discharge limits promulgated by USEPA, and incorporated by reference in 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 307. This term includes prohibitive discharge limits established
    pursuant to Section 310.201 through 310.213 or 35 Ill. Adm. Code 307.1101.
    This term also includes more stringent prohibitions and standards adopted by the
    Board in this Part or 35 Ill. Adm. Code 307, including 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    307.1101, 307.1102, and 307.1103. The term also includes local limits pursuant
    to Section 310.211 which that are a part of an approved pretreatment program.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(j) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Process wastewater” means any water which that, during manufacturing or
    processing, comes into direct contact with or results from the production or use of
    any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by-product, or waste
    product.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(q) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Process wastewater pollutants” means pollutants present in process wastewater.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(r) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Project XL” means the federal Project for eXcellence and Leadership or a
    federally approved facility- or community-based regulatory reinvention (XL) pilot
    project, as such are described in the Federal Register notices of May 23, 1995 (60
    Fed. Reg. 27282) and November 1, 1995 (60 Fed. Reg. 55569).
     
    “Publicly owned treatment works” or “POTW” means a “treatment works” which
    that is owned by the State of Illinois or a “unit of local government.” This
    definition includes any devices and systems used in the storage, treatment,
    recycling, and reclamation of municipal sewage or industrial wastewater. It also
    includes sewers, pipes, and other conveyances only if they convey wastewater to
    a POTW treatment plant. The term also means the “unit of local government”
    which that has jurisdiction over the indirect discharges to and the discharges from
    such a treatment works.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(o) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Schedule of compliance” means a schedule of remedial measures included in an
    authorization to discharge or a pretreatment permit, or an NPDES permit,
    including an enforceable sequence of interim requirements (for example, actions,

     
    19
    operations or milestone events) leading to compliance with this Part and 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 307. A schedule of compliance does not protect an industrial user or
    POTW from enforcement.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(m) (1991) (2000) and 33 U.S.C.
    1362(17).
     
    “Significant industrial user” means as follows:
     
    All industrial users subject to categorical pretreatment standards under
    Section 310.220 through 310.233 and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 307, and
     
    Any other industrial user that discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per
    day or more of process wastewater to the POTW (excluding sanitary,
    noncontact cooling, and boiler blowdown wastewater); contributes a
    process wastestream which that makes up five percent or more of the
    average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the POTW treatment
    plant; or is designated as such by the control authority, as defined in
    Section 310.601, on the basis that the industrial user has a reasonable
    potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any
    pretreatment standard or requirement (in accordance with Section
    310.510(f)); except, upon a finding that an industrial user meeting the
    criteria of this second subsection of this definition has no reasonable
    potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation of for violating any
    pretreatment standard or requirement, the control authority, as defined in
    Section 310.601, may at any time, on its own initiative or in response to a
    petition received from an industrial user or POTW may determine in
    accordance with Section 310.510(f) that such industrial user is not a
    significant industrial user.
     
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(t) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Sludge requirements” means any of the following permits or regulations: 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 309.155 (NPDES Permits), 309.208 (Permits for Sites Receiving
    Sludge for Land Application), 703.121 (RCRA Permits), 807.202 (Solid Waste
    Permits), the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601) or the Marine
    Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act (33 U.S.C. 1401), Section 39(b) of the
    Act (NPDES Permits), and Section 405(b) of the Clean Water Act (federally-
    imposed sludge use and management requirements).
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(i) and 403.7(a) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Submission” means a request to the Agency by a POTW for approval of a
    pretreatment program, or for authorization to grant removal credits.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(t) (1991) (2000).
     
    “Treatment works” is as defined in 33 U.S.C. 1292(2) (1987). It includes any
    devices and systems used in the storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of

     
    20
    municipal or industrial wastewater to implement 33 U.S.C. 1281, or necessary to
    recycle or reuse water at the most economical cost over the estimated life of the
    works, including intercepting sewers, outfall sewers, sewage collection systems,
    pumping, power, and other equipment.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.3(o) (1991) (2000) and 33 U.S.C.
    1292(2).
     
    “Unit of local government” means a unit of local government, as defined by Art.
    7, Sec. 1 of the Illinois Constitution, having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage.
    “Unit of local government” includes, but is not limited to, municipalities and
    sanitary districts.
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 401.11(m) (1991) (2000) and 33 U.S.C.
    1362(4).
     
    “USEPA” means the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
     
    (Source: Amended at 26 Ill. Reg. ________, effective ______________________)
     
    SUBPART L: FEDERAL PROJECT XL AGREEMENTS
     
    Section 310.930 Federally Approved Pretreatment Program Reinvention Pilot Projects
    Under Project XL
     
    Once a POTW has entered into a federally approved pretreatment program reinvention pilot
    project under Project XL, the Agency may, by a permit issued pursuant to Section 39 of the Act,
    allow that POTW to implement a pretreatment program that includes legal authorities and
    requirements that are different than the administrative requirements otherwise applicable under
    this Part.
     
    a) The POTW must submit any such alternative requirements as a substantial
    program modification in accordance with the procedures outlined in Subpart K of
    this Part. The approved modified program must be incorporated as an enforceable
    part of the POTW’s NPDES permit before the POTW may implement it.
     
    b) The Agency must include a reopener clause in the POTW’s NPDES permit that
    directs the POTW to discontinue implementing the approved alternative
    requirements and resume implementation of its previously approved pretreatment
    program if the Agency determines that the primary objectives of the local pilot
    pretreatment program embodied in the Project XL agreement are not being met or
    the Project XL agreement expires or is otherwise terminated pursuant to its own
    terms.
     
    BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 403.20, as added at 66 Fed. Reg. 50336 (October 3,
    2001). A Project XL agreement among the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater
    Chicago, the Agency, and USEPA and described at 66 Fed. Reg. 50336 (October 3, 2001)
    received final approval by USEPA and the Agency on August 30, 2001.

     
    21
     
    (Source: Added at 26 Ill. Reg. ________, effective ______________________)
     
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
    adopted the above opinion and order on March 7, 2002, by a vote of 7-0.
     
     
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top