ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October
5,
1995
JACK PEASE,
d/b/a
)
GLACIER LAKE EXTRACTION,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 95—118
)
(Permit Appeal-Mining)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by C.A. Manning):
This matter is before the Board on two motions for
reconsideration and/or clarification of the Board’s opinion
and order that was issued on July 21,
1995.
In that order we
found that the Agency’s denial of
a permit to Glacier Lake
Extraction
(GLE) was inappropriate, and we accordingly ordered
that the Agency issue the permit in question.
The first motion,
filed on July 22 by GLE, originally
requested that our order be amended to require that the Agency
backdate the permit to the date the permit was denied so that
GLE would be protected against
a pending enforcement charging
that it was operating without a permit.
Later filings reflect
that GLE is no longer concerned with the retroactive permit
date issue and,
it appears, GLE believes that the Board’s
order is “moot”.’
This latter conclusion arises from the fact
that, pursuant to a renewal permit application that was filed
independent of the permit in dispute, ~ permit
wa~
issued to
GLE on July 31 which apparently allows GLE to operate in the
same manner as would the permit in dispute, and resolves all
issues.
The Agency’s motion for reconsideration, filed on August
24, alleges a litany of caselaw which it would have applied
differently than the Board and accordingly requests that the
Board reconsider and reverse our final decision based on
alleged errors in our application of the law.
Alternatively,
the Agency asks that we vacate our order since a permit was in
fact issued to GLE on July 31.
1Apparently the Board’s determination on July 21,
1995 that GLE had a
right to a permit,
(and the effective date of the permit),
had a bearing on
the outcome of three related criminal cases pending before the circuit court
in McHenry County regarding
3LE~S
operating its mine without a proper permit.
As of GLE’s most recent filing on September 20,
1995,
the circuit court had
dismissed these actions concluding that even though a partnership between Jack
Pease and James Tonyan dissolved, GLE still had an effective permit until
August of 1995.
based upon the standards for granting motions for
reconsideration found at 35 Ill. Adm. Code Sections 101.246
and 101.300, we deny both motions for reconsideration.
There
is no new evidence which was not available at the time of the
Board’s consideration of this matter, and no changes in the
law or errors in our application thereof which would change
the outcome of our opinion and order in this matter.
The
Board’s order to issue the permit, which resulted based upon
the Board’s best judgement of all of the facts and law before
it
at the time,
was correctly entered.
Accordingly,
the Board
denies both motions for reconsideration.
However, since both
parties indicate that the permit issued on July 31,
independent of this proceeding,
is satisfactory and that this
matter
is resolved,
the Board hereby
grants
the
Agency’s
motion to vacate that portion of our order of July 21,
1995,
directing the Agency to issue a permit in accordance with the
opinion of the same date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Section
41. of the Environmental Protection Act
(415 ILCS
5/41) provides for the appeal of final Board orders within 35
days of the date of service of this order.
(See
also
35 Ill.
Adm. Code 101.246, Motion for Reconsideration.)
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board
hereby certify thai the above order was adopted
on the ___________day of
__________________,
1995,
by a
vote of
________________
2LLI
Dorothy )~7Gunn,~Clerk
Illinoi~J~ol1utionControl Board