ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 20,
1995
JACK PEASE, d/b/a
)
GLACIER
LAKE
EXTRACTION,
)
Petitioner,
)
PCB 95—112
)
(Permit Appeal
-
Mining)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
CONCURRING OPINION
(by E.
Dunham):
Though I agree with the outcome of this case
(issuance
of
the requested permit),
I believe that the case could have been
decided strictly on factual grounds.
Mr. Bruce Yurdin, the
permit reviewer in this case,
admitted that he did not
specifically research purgeable organic carbon
(POC) when he was
given those results by Glacier Lake Extraction
(GLE).
Had he
reviewed published reports of the Illinois Water Survey,
be would
have known that POC results from GLE are no higher than some
results from drinking water wells in the State.
Considering that POC is a fraction of total organic carbon
that includes
(at least potentially)
those volatile organic
carbon
(VOC) compounds of regulatory concern, Mr. Yurdin could
have conditioned a permit on the further analysis of groundwater
at GLE to prove that VOC was,
or was not, present.
The permit
could further have been conditioned upon cleanup of any
contamination found as a result of sampling.
Given a low probability of harm caused by POC levels
equivalent to drinking water, Mr. Yurdin should have issued the
permit to GLE, with conditions.
For these reasons,
I concur.
Emmett
E. Dunham
II,
Board Member
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, here~certify that ~ti~eabove concurring opinion was filed
on the
c~/
,
day of
________________,
1995.
(2
~,
Dorothy M. 14unn, Clerk
Illinois P~1utionControl Board