ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    July 20,
    1995
    JACK PEASE, d/b/a
    )
    GLACIER
    LAKE
    EXTRACTION,
    )
    Petitioner,
    )
    PCB 95—112
    )
    (Permit Appeal
    -
    Mining)
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    CONCURRING OPINION
    (by E.
    Dunham):
    Though I agree with the outcome of this case
    (issuance
    of
    the requested permit),
    I believe that the case could have been
    decided strictly on factual grounds.
    Mr. Bruce Yurdin, the
    permit reviewer in this case,
    admitted that he did not
    specifically research purgeable organic carbon
    (POC) when he was
    given those results by Glacier Lake Extraction
    (GLE).
    Had he
    reviewed published reports of the Illinois Water Survey,
    be would
    have known that POC results from GLE are no higher than some
    results from drinking water wells in the State.
    Considering that POC is a fraction of total organic carbon
    that includes
    (at least potentially)
    those volatile organic
    carbon
    (VOC) compounds of regulatory concern, Mr. Yurdin could
    have conditioned a permit on the further analysis of groundwater
    at GLE to prove that VOC was,
    or was not, present.
    The permit
    could further have been conditioned upon cleanup of any
    contamination found as a result of sampling.
    Given a low probability of harm caused by POC levels
    equivalent to drinking water, Mr. Yurdin should have issued the
    permit to GLE, with conditions.
    For these reasons,
    I concur.
    Emmett
    E. Dunham
    II,
    Board Member

    I, Dorothy M.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, here~certify that ~ti~eabove concurring opinion was filed
    on the
    c~/
    ,
    day of
    ________________,
    1995.
    (2
    ~,
    Dorothy M. 14unn, Clerk
    Illinois P~1utionControl Board

    Back to top