ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September
7,
1995
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
CO-PETITION OF SOLAR
)
AS 94-2
CORPORATION AND THE ILLINOIS
)
(Adjusted Standard
-
Air)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
)
AGENCY FOR AN ADJUSTED
)
STANDARD FROM 35
ILL. ADM.
)
CODE 218 SUBPART PP
)
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by M. McFawn):
This matter is before the Board on a “Motion to Modify Final
Board Order,” filed by the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency
(Agency) on August 14,
1995.
Solar Corporation (Solar)
filed a response to the motion on September 1,
1995.
Because the
Agency’s motion is requesting that the Board re—examine
a final
Board opinion and order,
we will treat it as
a motion for
r~c~c~rcrirrn
*
In its motion, the Agency seeks to modify the language of
the Board’s July 20, 1995 opinion and order granting the co-
petition for adjusted standard in this matter.
The Agency states
that a misunderstanding has resulted concerning its position
regarding the environmental and health effects of the proposed
adjusted standard.
In its motion, the Agency points out that it
stated at hearing:
The Agency believes that the proposed adjusted standard
will not result in environmental or health effects
substantially and significantly more adverse than the
effects than those considered in adoption of
R93-14
regulations.
(Tr. at 10)
In a motion to correct the transcript filed by Solar on May
3,
1995, and agreed to by the Agency, Solar made the following
correction
at page 18 of the transcript.
As the Agency has stated, we believe that this adjusted
standard will result in some ill effects or adverse
impact on the environment
.
.
.
“
should read
“...
this
adjusted standard will result in
no
ill effects or
adverse impact
.
.
The Agency states in its motion that it considers this
statement to be
in error, and that it mistakenly concurred in the
motion to correct the tran8cript.
The Agency
states that it does
not consider emission of VOM, especially during the ozone season,
to be insignificant.
The Agency therefore asserts that the
statement should properly have been left as “some ill effects”,
2
not “no ill effects.”
Therefore, while the Agency still
recommends that the adjusted standard be granted,
it asks that
page
8 of the July 20, 1995 opinion of the Board be modified as
follows:
The pctitioncrs-
assert
that impact to general air quality
and the effects to the health or environmen~will be
inc3ignificant based upon the emission data of VOM from the
adhesives used by Solar4, and that the rcgucstcd adjusted
standard will not be substantially or significantly more
adverse than the impact and effects than those considered in
adoption of RACT regulations. have no adverse impact on
hcalth or tWo cnvironmcnt.
In its response to the motion,
Solar states that, while it
believes that the relief granted will result in no ill effects or
adverse impact upon human health and the environment,
it has no
objection to the Agency’s proposed modification.
Because the proposed change will clarify the agreed-upon
position of the joint petitioners concerning the effect of the
proposed adjusted standard, the motion for reconsideration is
granted.
The Agency’s proposed changes to the final opinion are
accordingly adopted.
We note that this will only affect the
language of the July 20,
1995 opinion, and will not affect the
language of the
July 20,
1995 final order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Boj~,~hereby certify/that the above order was adopted on~he,
~
day of
.,~?&eAJ
1995,
by
a vote of
f~”
~
iiL~
Dorothy M.
ç4tin, Clerk
Illinois Th4jution Control Board