ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March 21, 1996
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    )
    )
    TRIENNIAL WATER QUALITY REVIEW:
    )
    R94-1(A)
    AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL. ADM. CODE
    )
    (Rulemaking
    -
    Water)
    302.208 and 302.407 (Lead and Mercury)
    1
    Proposed Rule
    Second Notice
    PROPOSED OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by
    E. Dunham, C.A. Manning, and
    R.C. Flemal):
    This matter comes before the Board on a regulatory proposal filed on February 24,
    1994 by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency). The Agency filed the
    proposal as part ofits mandatory review of the applicable water quality standards of the State
    of Illinois pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §~1251-1387 (1987)2. On January 4, 1996, the Board
    severed the docket into subdockets A & B.3 By today’s order the Board sends the proposed
    amendments to the lead and mercury standards to second notice.
    The Board’s responsibility in this matter arises from the Environmental Protection Act.
    The Board is charged therein to “determine, define, and implement the environmental control
    standards applicable in the state of Illinois.” (415 ILCS
    5/5(b)
    (1994).) More generally, the
    Board’s rulemaking charge is based on the system ofchecks and balances integral to the
    illinois environmental governance: the Board bears responsibility for the rulemaking and
    principal adjudicatory functions; the Agency has primary responsibility for administration of
    the Act and the Board’s regulations. The latter includes administering today’s proposed
    amendments.
    PROCEDURAL HISTORY
    The proposed amendments were filed by the Agency pursuant to Section 27 of the
    Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/27 (1994)) and the Board’s procedural rules
    1
    The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the CleanWater Act
    (CWA),
    §~
    101-607 requires the Agency to periodically, but at leastevery three years, review
    the water quality standards applicable in the State. This review is commonly referredto as the
    “triennial review”. The Board today adds this designation to the caption in this matter for
    purposes of more fully characterizingthe instant proceeding.
    2
    Subdocket (A) is comprised of the amendments proposed by the Agency for lead and
    mercury (Sections 302.208 and 302.407). Subdocket (B) contains the amendments proposed
    by the Agency for ammonia nitrogen (Sections 392.202, 302.212, 302.213, 304.122 and
    304.301).

    2
    at 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    §~
    102.120 and 102.121. By order of May 5, 1994 accepted the Agency
    proposal as a federally-required mie pursuant to Section 2&2 of the Act
    By order of September 15, 1994 the Board adopted the Agency’s proposal for purposes
    of first notice, pursuant to Section 5.01 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act. (415
    ILCS 100/1005-40). The Board adopted the proposal without making substantive comment on
    the merits of the proposal. First notice publication occurred in the Illinois Register on
    September 30, 1994 at 18 Ill. Reg. 14555 (Part 302) and 18 IlJ. Reg. 14549 (Part 304). The
    Illinois Administrative Procedure Act requires that adoption of the rule occur within one year
    ofthe first notice publication.
    (5
    ILCS
    5140(e)
    (1994).) As the one-year time period had
    already elapsed, the Board sent part ofthe rulemaking back to first notice. The proposed
    amendments to the lead and mercury standards were published in the Illinois Register on
    January 26, 1996 at 20 Ill. Reg. 1445.
    Publication ofthe proposed amendments in the Illinois Register began a 45 day
    comment period. The Board received no comments during the comment period. The Board
    received editorial changes from the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. These changes
    are incorporated in the amendments as proposed for second notice.
    Three public hearings in this matter were held before hearing officer Diane O’Neill: on
    November 10, 1994 in Chicago, Illinois; on November 22, 1994 in Springfield, Illinois; and
    on January 26, 1995 in Chicago, Illinois. At hearing the Board received testimony in support
    of the proposal from the Agency, as well as testimony on various aspects of the proposal from
    interested persons. The hearing record pertaining to lead, mercury and non-anunonia matters
    is summarized below.
    SUMMARY OF THE RECORD BEFORE THE BOARD IN DOCKET A
    The principal provisions of the instant proposed amendments are revision of the
    Board’s General Use Water Quality Standards for lead, mercury, and ammonia nitrogen, as
    found at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 302.208 and 302.2 12, and modification of the ammonia effluent
    exception procedures at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 304.122 and 304.301. The proposal also contains
    several conforming and housekeeping amendments.
    The Board summarizes the proposal submitted by the Agency along with the record
    developed to date in this matter as they pertain to lead and mercury standards.
    Overview of the Proposal-Subdocket A
    Lead: General Use Water Quality Standard Among its General Use Water Quality
    Standards, the Board currently has an acute standard (AS) for lead found at 35 Ill. Adni. Code

    3
    302,208. The General Use Water Quality Standards currently do
    j~
    specify a chronic
    standard (CS) for lead.
    Pursuant to today’s proposal, the AS for lead would be modified to reflect updated
    aquatic toxicity data regarding lead, and a CS for lead would be added. In both cases, the lead
    standards would be expressed as functions of hardness.
    Mercury: General Use AS and CS Water Ouality Standards The Board currently has a
    mercury AS among its General Use Water Quality Standards. Today’s proposal would change
    that AS from
    0.5
    ug/L to 2.6
    ugiL,
    based upon the most recent aquatic life toxicity
    information regarding mercury. Today’s action would also add, for the first time, a CS for
    mercury at a value of 1.3 ug/L.
    Human Health Water Quality Standards Today’s action proposes, for the first time in
    the Board’s General Use Water Quality standards, a human health standard (HHS)4. Only one
    such standard is today proposed, that being for mercury at new subsection (I) of 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 302.208. The value proposed for the mercury HHS is 0.Ol2ug/L, which is lower than
    the currently existing AS for mercury at Section 302.208. New text is also proposed at new
    302.208(c) and 302.208(e)(3) to support the human health standard.
    Conforming and Housekeeping Amendments There are several places in the sections
    which are today opened for other purposes where housekeeping corrections are in order.
    Among these are updating citations to the Illinois Compiled Statues to the current (1994)
    edition and replacement of the preferred abbreviation ofthe word “liter” from “1” to “L”.
    The Agency’s proposal amends the STORET number for un-ionized ammonia (as N)
    found at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 302.407. As the Agency observes, the STORET number currently
    found at Section 302.407 for un-ionized ammonia (as N) is actually the number for un-ionized
    ammonia (as NH3). The Board corrects the STORET number in Section 302.407 in today’s
    order.
    At hearing on November 22, 1994 the Agency submitted an errata sheet correcting
    typographical errors that appeared in the proposed amendments as first noticed. These, along
    with similar changes suggested by the Administrative Code Division in Public Comment #25,
    have been incorporated into today’s proposal.
    ~ The Board observes that human health criteria, pursuant to
    35.
    ill. Adm. Code 302.Subpart
    F, have been a feature ofthe Board’s water quality regulations since 1990. (See also
    Amendments to Title 35 Subtitle C (Toxics Control), R88-21, fmal opinion and order of the
    Board, January
    25,
    1990.)

    4
    HEARING RECORD
    Agency Witnesses
    -
    Mosher The testimony of Mr. Mosher focused on the technical
    justification for the proposed new water quality standards, and on the anticipated economic
    impact ofthe new water quality standards.
    As regards the lead standards, Mr. Mosher testified that the Agency’s proposed
    numbers have been tailored to illinois conditions but remain consistent with the national
    criteria for lead. (Tn. at 22.) Mr. Mosher observed that there is some controversy over the
    existing NCD for lead5 associated with the nature of the species that control the chronic lead
    standard, inability of analytic techniques to accurately measure low lead values, and the
    absence of approved test methodology for the most toxic forms of lead. (Mosher at 24.) In
    view ofthese and other problems, the Agency believes that Illinois-specific lead standards are
    justified and achievable. Mr. Mosher testified:
    The Agency concludes that the proposed chronic criterion for lead is
    most suitable foruse in Illinois in that it is driven by native aquatic organisms
    and the degree of safety factoring is held to an appropriate level because of
    the improved methodology. This criterion is more in line with observations in
    Illinois streams in that violations of the chronic standard will not routinely occur
    in streams supporting high quality biota.
    . .
    With the establishment of a èhronic
    standard, the acute standard cap is no longer necessary. The proposed acute
    standard is very similar to the existing standard without the cap. (Mosher at 28.)
    As regards the proposed new mercury standards, Mr. Mosher observed that the
    existing mercury water quality standard (0.5 ug/L) is based on human health considerations,
    even though it is identified in the regulations as a standard forthe protection of aquatic life (an
    AS). (Mosher at 19.) At this juncture in time, sufficient information is available to
    promulgate aquatic protection standards that are truly based on aquatic life conditions.
    Accordingly, the Agency recommends that this step now be taken (Tn. at 22),. and
    additionally that the current
    0.5
    ug/L standard be properly recognized in the regulations as a
    HHS.
    The existing acute standard was set lower than levels ofmercury which actually cause
    effects to aquatic life. (Mosher at 21.) This was done in part to limit the total amount of
    mercury that could be discharged because of the lack of a chronic or HHS standard. (Mosher
    at 21.) The Agency now proposes to update this standard and others for chronic toxicity
    protection of aquatic life and protection of human health through the prevention of fish flesh
    contamination. (Mosher at 21.) The Agency recommends that adoption of the NCD acute and
    This document is Exhibit J to the Agency’s proposal of February 24, 1994.

    5
    chronic criteria and proposes the NCD chronic criterion protective of bioaccumulation in fish
    flesh as a HHS. (Mosher at 21.)
    The Agency believes that the economic impact resulting from the proposed lead and
    mercury standards will be minimal. (Mosher at 37.) No additional treatment for lead is
    believed to be required as a result of this rulemaking. (Mosher at 37.) The few dischargers in
    Illinois with lead limits in their permits are utilizing the best degree oftreatment and are not
    expected to have trouble meeting the new standard. (Mosher at 37.) Mercury dischargers are
    rare and the new standards will have the most potential impact by encouraging pollution
    prevention. (Mosher at 37.) Dischargers with mercury limits will be required to utilize the
    best analytical methods to detect mercury at levels as low as possible. (Mosher at 38.) This
    may result in some minor additional expense. (Mosher at 38.)
    Public Comments
    The Board received 25 public comments on the Agency’s proposal. The origin and
    content ofthose public comments pertaining to the mercury and lead standards are summarized
    in this section.
    PC #1:
    By Linda Brand, Manager of Regulatory Flexibility Unit, Illinois Department
    ofCommerce and Community Affairs: a review of the proposed amendments
    found no impact on small businessesL. Filed
    10/5/94.
    PC #11:
    The Sierra Club, illinois Chapter ofTrout Unlimited, Citizens for a Better
    Environment, Lake Michigan Federation, and Friends of the Chicago River,
    by Albert F. Ettinger; supports adoption ofproposed standards for mercury
    and lead. Filed
    3/10/95.
    PC #12:
    By Jeffrey Flocken, Lake Michigan Federation; supports the proposed
    standards. Mr. Flocken sites the health effects of mercury. Filed 3/10/95.
    PC #25:
    By the Index Department of the Administrative Code Division of the Office of
    the Secretary of State; notes corrections that must be made to the text ofthe
    rule before the rule can be adopted. The Board today makes the suggested
    corrections to the text. Filed 11/7/94.
    DISCUSSION
    The Board believes that the Agency has adequately demonstrated that the water quality
    standards it recommends for lead and mercury are justifiable and necessary for the protection
    of aquatic life in Illinois. The Board accordingly today proposes adoption ofthese standards
    as recommended by the Agency for second notice.

    6
    ORDER
    The Board hereby directs that second notice ofthe following proposed amendments be
    submitted to the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules:
    SUBTITLE C: WATER POLLUTION
    CHAPTER I: POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    PART 302
    WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
    SUBPART A: GENERAL WATER QUALITY PROVISIONS
    Definitions
    Scope and Applicability
    Allowed Mixing, Mixing Zones and ZIDs
    Stream Flows
    Main Riven Temperatures
    Nondegradation
    SUBPART B: GENERAL USE WATER
    QUALITY STANDARDS
    Scope and Applicability
    Purpose
    Offensive Conditions
    pH
    Phosphorus
    Dissolved Oxygen
    Radioactivity
    Numeric Standards for
    Fecal Choliform
    Other Toxic Substances
    Temperature
    TITLE
    35:
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    Section
    302.100
    302.101
    302. 102
    302.103
    302.104
    302. 105
    Section
    302.201
    302.202
    302.203
    302.204
    302.205
    302.206
    302.207
    302.208
    302.209
    302.210
    302.211
    302 .212
    Chemical Constituents
    Ammonia Nitrogen and Un-ionizedAmmonia

    7
    SUBPART C: PUBLIC AND FOOD
    PROCESSING WATERSUPPLY STANDARDS
    Section
    302.301
    Scope and Applicability
    302.302
    Algicide Permits
    302.303
    Finished Water Standards
    302.304
    Chemical Constituents
    302.305
    Other Contaminants
    302.306
    Fecal Coliform
    SUBPART D: SECONDARY CONTACT AND
    INDIGENOUS AQUATIC LIFE STANDARDS
    Section
    302.401
    Scope and Applicability
    302.402
    Purpose
    302.403
    Unnatural Sludge
    302.404
    pH
    302.405
    Dissolved Oxygen
    302.406
    Fecal Coliform (Repealed)
    302.407
    Chemical Constituents
    302.408
    Temperature
    302.409
    Cyanide
    302.410
    Substances Toxic to Aquatic Life
    SUBPART E:
    LAKE MICHIGAN WATER
    QUALITY STANDARDS
    Section
    302.501
    Scope and Applicability
    302.502
    Dissolved Oxygen
    302.503
    pH
    302.504
    Chemical Constituents
    302.505
    Fecal Coliform
    302.506
    Temperature
    302.507
    Existing Sourceson January 1, 1971
    302.508
    Sources under Construction But Not in Operation on January 1, 1971
    302.509
    Other Sources

    8
    SUBPART F: PROCEDURES FOR
    DETERMINING WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
    Scope and Applicability
    Definitions
    Mathematical Abbreviations
    Data Requirements
    Determining the Acute Aquatic Toxicity
    General Procedures
    Determining the Acute Aquatic Toxicity
    Water Chemistry
    Determining the Acute Aquatic Toxicity
    Water Chemistry
    Determining the Acute Aquatic Toxicity
    Combinations ofSubstances
    Determining the Chronic Aquatic Toxicity Criterion for an Individual Substance
    -
    General Procedures
    Determining the Chronic Aquatic Toxicity Criterion
    -
    Procedure for
    Combination of Substances
    The Wild and Domestic Animal Protection Criterion
    The Human Threshold Criterion
    Determining the Acceptable Daily Intake
    Determining the Human Threshold Criterion
    The Human Nonthreshold Cnitenion
    Determining the Risk Associated Intake
    Determining the Human Nonthreshold Criterion
    Stream Flow for Application of Human Nonthreshold Criterion
    Bioconcentration Factor
    Determination of Bioconcentration Factor
    Utilizing the Bioconcentration Factor
    Listing of Derived Criteria
    Appendix A References to Previous Rules
    Appendix B Sources of Codified Sections
    AUTHORITY: hnplementing Section 13 and authorized by Section 27 ofthe Environmental
    Protection Act 415 ILCS 5/13 and 27).
    SOURCE: Filed with the Secretary of State January 1, 1978; amended at 2 Ill. Reg. 44, p.
    151, effective November 2, 1978; amended at 3 ill. Reg. 20, p.
    95,
    effective May 17, 1979:
    amended at 3 ill. Reg.
    25,
    p. 190, effective June 21, 1979; codified at 6 ill. Reg. 7818;
    amended at 6 ill. Reg. 11161, effective September 7, 1982; amended at 6 ill. Reg. 13750,
    Section
    302.601
    302.603
    302.604
    302.606
    302.612
    302.615
    302.618
    302.621
    302.627
    302.630
    302.633
    302.642
    302.645
    302.648
    302.651
    302.654
    302.657
    302.658
    302.660
    302.663
    302.666
    302.669
    Criterion for an Individual Substance
    -
    Criterion
    -
    Toxicity Independent of
    Criterion
    -
    Toxicity Dependent on
    Criterion
    -
    Procedures for

    9
    effective October 26, 1982; amended at 8 Ill. Reg. 1629, effective January 18, 1984;
    peremptory amendments at 10 Ill. Reg. 461, effective December 23, 1985; amended in R87-27
    at 12 ill. Reg. 9911, effective May 27, 1988; amended at in R85-29 at 12 ill. Reg. 12082,
    effective July 11, 1988; amended in R88-1 at 13 Ill. Reg. 5998, effective April 18, 1989;
    amended in R88-21(A) at 14 Ill. Reg. 2899, effective February 13, 1990; amended in R88-
    21(B) at 14 Ill. Reg. 11974, effective July
    9, 1990; amended in R94-1(A) at 20 Ill.
    Reg.
    ,
    effective
    ________________________________________
    BOARD NOTE: This Part implements the Illinois Environmental Protection Act as of July 1.
    1994.
    SUBPART B: GENERAL USE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
    Section 302.208 Numeric Standards for Chemical Constituents
    a)
    The acute standard (AS) for the chemical constituents listed in subsection (de)
    shall not be exceeded at any time except as provided in subsection (e4).
    b)
    The chronic standard (CS) for IlK cheniical constituents listed in subsection ~d~)
    shall not be exceeded by the arithmetic average of at least four consecutive
    samples collected over any period of at least four days, except as provided in
    subsection (e4). The samples used to demonstrate compliance or lack of
    compliance with a CS must be collected in a manner which assures an average
    representative ofthe sampling period.
    c)
    The human health standard (HHS) for the chemical constituents listed in
    subsection (IT) shall not be exceeded when the stream flow is at or above the
    harmonic mean flow pursuant to Section 302.658 nor shall an annual average.
    based on at least eight samples. collected in a manner representative of the
    sampling period, exceed the HHS except as provided in subsection (d).
    ~e)
    Inwaters where mixing is allowed pursuant to Section 302.102, the following
    apply:
    1.
    The AS shall not be exceeded in any waters except for those waters for
    which the Agency has approved a ZID pursuant to Section 302.102.
    2.
    The CS shall not be exceeded outside of waters in which mixing is
    allowed pursuant to Section 302. lO2.~
    3.
    The HHS shall not be exceeded outside of waters in which mixing is
    allowed pursuant to Section 302.102.

    10
    ed)
    Numeric Water Ouality Standarsls for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms
    360
    exp~A+Bln(H), but
    not to exceed 50
    ugIL,
    where
    A=-2.918 and
    B
    =
    1.128
    16
    exp~A+Bln(H)
    where A=3.688
    and B =0.8190
    exp~A+Bln(H)
    where Ar-i .464
    and B =0.9422
    22
    exp~A+Bln(H)
    but not to
    exceed 100 ug/L
    where Ar 1.460
    -~301 and B=1.273
    ug/L
    =
    microgram per liter,
    exp~x
    =
    base neutral logarithms raised to the
    x- power, and
    Storet
    AS
    CS
    Constituent
    Number
    (ug/L)
    (ug/L)
    Arsenic
    (total)
    Cadmium
    (total)
    Chromium (total
    hexavalent)
    Chromium (total
    trivalent)
    Copper
    (total)
    Cyanide
    Lead
    (total)
    Mercury
    TRC
    where:
    01002
    01027
    01032
    01033
    01042
    00718
    01051
    71900
    500600
    190
    exp A+Bln(H)
    where A=-3.490
    and B =0.7852
    11
    exp~A+Bln(HjJ
    where Ar 1.561
    and B=0.8190
    exp~A+Bln(H)
    where A=~1.465
    and B=0.8545
    5.2
    Not Applied
    explA +Bln(JDL
    where A=-2.863
    and B=i.273
    ~~JQ1Applied
    1.3
    19
    ii
    ln(H)
    =
    natural
    logarithm of Hardness (STORET 00900):

    11
    fi
    Numeric Water Ouality Standard for the Protection ofHuman Health
    Constituent
    STORET
    Number
    (ug/L)
    Mercury
    71900
    0.0 12
    where ug/L
    =
    micrograms per liter
    Concentrations of the following chemical constituents shall not be exceeded
    except in waters for which mixing is allowed pursuant to Section 302.102.
    g~)
    Constituent
    STORET
    Unit
    Number
    Standard
    Barium (total)
    mg/L
    01007~
    5.0
    Boron (total)
    mg/L
    01022
    1.0
    Chloride (total)
    mg/L
    00940
    500.
    Fluoride
    mg/L
    00951
    1.4
    Iron (dissolved)
    mg/L
    01046
    1.0
    Manganese (total)
    mg/L
    01055
    1.0
    Nickel (total)
    mg/L
    01067
    1.0
    Phenols
    mg/L
    32730
    0.1
    Selenium (total)
    mg/L
    00147
    1 M
    Silver (total)
    ug/L
    01077
    5.0
    Sulfate
    iiig/L
    00945
    500.
    Total Dissolved
    mg/L
    70300
    1000.
    Solids
    Zinc (total)
    mg/L
    01092
    1.0
    where: mg/L
    =
    milligram per liter and
    ug/L
    =
    microgram per liter
    (Source: Amended at 20 Ill. Reg.
    __________,
    effective
    )

    12
    Section 302.407 Chemical Constituents
    Concentrations ofother chemical constituents shall not exceed the following standards:
    Ammonia Un-ionized (as N*)
    Arsenic (total
    Barium (total)
    Cadmium (total)
    Chromium (total hcxavalcnt)
    Chromium (total trivalent)
    Copper (total)
    Cyanide (total)
    Fluoride (total)
    Iron (total)
    Iron (dissolved)
    Lead (total)
    Manganese (total)
    Mercury (total)
    Nickel (total)
    Oil, fats and grease
    Phenols
    Selenium (total)
    Silver
    Zinc (total)
    Total Dissolved Solids
    006192
    01002
    01007
    01027
    01032
    01033
    01042
    00720
    00951
    01045
    01046
    01051
    01055
    71900
    01067
    00550, 00556
    or 00560
    32730
    00~147
    01077
    01092
    70300
    0.1
    1.0
    5.0
    0.15
    0.3
    1.0
    1.0
    0.10
    15.0
    2.0
    0.5
    0.1
    1.0
    0.0005
    i.0
    i5.0~~k
    03
    1.0
    1.1
    1.0
    1500
    STORET
    CONCENTRATIO
    CONSTITUENTS
    NUMBER
    N
    (mg/1~)

    13
    *For purposes of this
    section the concentration ofun-ionized ammonia shall be computed
    according to the following equation:
    U =
    N
    where:
    0.94412(1 + lox) + 0.0559
    X=0.09018+ 2729.92
    -pH
    (T + 273.16)
    U
    =
    Concentration ofun-ionized ammonia as N in mg/It
    N
    =
    Concentration of ammonia nitrogen as N in
    mg/lb
    T
    =
    Temperature in degrees Celsius
    **Oil shall be analytically separated into polar and non-polar components if the total
    concentration exceeds
    15 mg/It. In no case shall either of the components exceed 15
    mg/IL
    (i.e., 15 mg/IL
    polar materials and 15 mg/It non-polar materials).
    (Source: Amended at 20 Ill. Reg.
    _______________,
    effective ___________________________
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, hereby certify that
    the above opinion and order was adopted on thec2/
    ~ft:
    day of
    7kiSi~-ct~
    ,
    1996, by
    avoteof
    _______
    ~Dorothy
    M. 9~in,
    ~‘t
    Clerk
    Illinois PolliLtión Control Board

    Back to top