ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    July
    24, 1980
    CITY OF BELVIDERE,
    )
    Petitioner,
    V.
    )
    PCB 80—86
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    Respondent.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by J. Anderson):
    This matter comes before the Board on the April 21, 1980,
    petition by the City of Belvidere for variance from the BODç and
    Total Suspended Solids (TSS) limitations of Rule 404(c) of chapter 3:
    Water Pollution (Chapter 3). On June 18, 1980, the Environmental
    Protection Agency (Agency) filed its Recommendation in support of
    variance. Hearing was waived, and none was held.
    Petitioner, the City of Belvidere (City), which is located
    in Boone County, owns and operates an area wastewater treatment
    facility serving 14,946 residents and 275 commercial and industrial
    users. The discharge monitoring reports for this facility for
    theand12pastmg/iyearTSSshowmonthlyconsistentaverageexcursionsand
    the 25-30from dailythe
    10maximummg/i BOD5
    effluent limitations established by its NPDES permit. The City
    attributes these excursions to a) excessive infiltration and
    inflow, h) inefficiency of existing vacuum sludge filters,
    resulting in solids carryover into plant effluent, and c) the
    fact that the facility when upgraded in 1970 was designed to
    produce the 20 mg/i 130D5 and 25 mg/i TSS monthly average effluent
    required by then existing rules (Pet. 1—2, Rec. 1—2).
    The City has actively sought the funding necessary to upgrade
    its plant since 1977. It currently holds place number 633 on the
    Agency’s Fiscal Year 1980 Construction Grants Priority list.
    Because of the numerous and costly problems involved with main-
    tenance of its sludge filters, in 1979 the City applied for and
    received emergency authorization from the Agency to desic~n and
    install belt filter press solids dewatering equipment prior to
    the eventual design and construction of the balance of the im-
    provements identified in the City’s facility plan. (It is
    important to note that in the emergency authorization situation,
    the authorized work is done without immediate 75 Federal Funding.)
    The City calculates that the dewatering equipment will be installed
    and operational by July 1, 1981, assuming no undue delays in Agency
    review of plans or in equipment manufacture. It is anticipated that

    2
    the balance of the plant improvements will be completed before
    July, 1983, although this time estimate is contingent upon Agency
    certification of Step 1 studies and the availabliity of Federal
    construction funds (Pet. 2, 4, 7, Rec. 3).
    Pursuant to this plan for upgrading its facility, the City
    requests a two-step variance. First, until installation of the
    belt filter press dewatering system, and for approximately one
    month of operation thereafter (to allow the plant solids inventory
    to reach equilibrium), the City seeks to have the monthly average
    BOD5 and TSS levels set at 30 and 30, and the daily maximum limits
    set at 75 and 75. Second, during the period after installation of
    the dewatering system but before completion of the balance of the
    upgrading improvements, the City petitions that these levels be
    set at a monthly average of 20 and 25, and a daily maximum of 50
    and 63 (Pet, 6—7),
    The City alleges that the grant of the requested variance
    will have no adverse impact on the quality of the Kishwaukee
    River into which its plant discharges, and the Agency confirms
    this. As its last point, the City explains that denial of variance
    would impose a severe economic hardship, in that the $8.8 million
    dollars in capital improvements necessary for upgrading its plant
    are economically feasible only if the City can count on 75 of
    this cost being federally funded, which funding is contingent on
    compliance with applicable state law (Pet, 8, Rec. 3).
    The Board finds that it would be arbitrary and unreasonable
    to refuse to grant the City~svariance request; the City has
    moved expeditiously to upgrade its plant and essentially here
    petitions the Board for the necessary authorization to continue
    to do so. Therefore, variance from Rule 404(c) of Chapter 3 is
    granted, with conditions, through July 31, 1983. The Board
    extends the variance periods suggested by the parties by one
    month to provide some slight cushion for unavoidable delay.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board~s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this mattet.
    ORDER
    Petitioner, the City of Belvidere, is hereby granted a
    variance from Rule 404(c) of Chapter 3: Water Pollution, subject
    to the following conditions:
    1) Through July 31, 1981, the effluent from the City~s
    wastewater treatment facility shall not exceed the following
    effluent levels: a monthly average for both BOD5 and Total
    Suspended Solids (TSS) of 30 mg/l, and a daily maximum for both
    SOD5 and TSS of 75 mg/i.
    2) From August 1, 1981, through July 31, 1983, the effluent
    from the City’s wastewater treatment facility shall not exceed the

    3
    following effluent levels: a monthly average for SOD of 20 mg/i
    and for TSS of 25 mg/I. and a daily maximum for BOD5 o~50 mg/i and
    for TSS of 63 mg/i.
    3) The City shall continue diligent pursuit of grant funding
    for the upgrading of its facility.
    4) The City shall operate and maintain its facility at all
    times in such manner as to produce effluent of the best quality
    practicable.
    5) Within 45 days of the date of this Order, the City of
    Belvedere shall execute and forward to the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency, Division of Water Pollution Control, Variance
    Unit, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield, IL 62706, and executed
    Certification of Acceptance and Agreement to be bound by all
    conditions of the variance. The forty-five day period herein
    shall be stayed during judicial review of this variance pursuant
    to Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act. The form of
    said certification shall he as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I, (We,)
    ,
    having read
    the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 80-86,
    dated
    __________________,
    understand and accept the said Order,
    realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and conditions
    thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By ____________________________
    Authorized Agent
    Title ________________________
    Date ___________________________
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the
    ______
    day of
    __________,
    1980, by a vote of
    Christan L. Moffett, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top