ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September 18,
    1980
    WOODLANE CORPORATION,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 80—108
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    )
    AGENCY and COUNTY OF DuPage,
    )
    )
    Respondents.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by
    I.
    Goodman):
    Woodlane’s August 15, 1980 motion prays to amend in order
    to seek connection to the interim wastewater treatment
    (package)
    plant ordered by the ~oard to be constructed by certain past
    variance petitioners
    as set forth in the compliance plans and
    the Board’s Opinion in those matters.
    Such plant
    is to have a
    design average flow of 0.25 million gallons per day and minimum
    treatment capacity of the average equivalent mass BOD5 and
    hydraulic loading that will be generated by the proposed projects
    of three of the petitioners
    (First Consolidated Properties,
    Inc.;
    Green Trails,
    Ltd.; and Grant ~Square Service Corporation).
    Because it is possible that such project may upon completion
    be able to treat the estimated 72,000 gallons per day influent
    from Woodlane’s Training Center facility,
    all five of the
    aforementioned petitioners
    (as well as the County of DuPage) are
    necessary parties to the instant petition.
    Petitioner’s motion to amend is denied for this reason.
    Leave is granted to
    file a renewed motion upon the proof of service
    of th? existing petition, all allowed amendments,
    and the amendment
    proposed,
    as well as a copy of this Board Order,
    upon all five of
    the aforementioned petitioners within 45 days of the date of this
    Order.
    Petitioner’s motion to amend is also denied because, although
    it waives hearing on the petition,
    it attaches no affidavit
    averring that the facts stated in its petition, and any and all
    amendments made or proposed to be made thereto,
    are true.
    Without
    such affidavit,
    the Board will not, when hearing is waived,
    accept
    variance petitions.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    1Corporate West,
    Inc.
    v.
    IEPA, PCB 80—96
    (and related four
    consolidated cases).
    —2—
    I, Christan L. Moffett,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Boa d, hereb
    c
    tif
    that the above Order was ad
    ted
    on the
    ____
    day of
    ~
    ,
    1980 by a vote of
    ____
    ~
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top