ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 6, 2001
NELSON WESTERBERG, INC.
Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PCB 01-140
(UST - Appeal)
DISSENTING OPINION (by G.T. Girard and Thomas E. Johnson):
We respectfully dissent from the majority order issued today. This case is before the
Board on cross-motions for summary judgement. We do not believe that additional explanation
by the Office of State Fire Marshal is necessary or warranted. In deciding a motion for summary
judgement the Board first determines if there is a genuine issue of material fact. Based on the
record and pleadings before the Board, there is no genuine issue of material fact and this case is
ripe for decision.
The record clearly demonstrates that the two tanks at issue were properly registered in
March 1986 and the two tanks were in use at the time of registration. R. at 1-2. The denial letter
from Office of State Marshal states that the petitioner is ineligible for reimbursement because the
two tanks were “not in operation at any time since January 1, 1974.” There is no support in the
record for this assertion. Therefore, this case is ready to be decided. Based on facts in the record
and the application of Section 57.9 of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/57.9), we
would grant summary judgement in favor of the petitioner and find that petitioner is eligible for
reimbursement.
For these reasons, we respectfully dissent.
G. Tanner Girard
______________________________
Thomas E. Johnson
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that I received
the above dissenting opinion on September 6, 2001.
2
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board