The
Illinois
C
American
RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
MAY
18
2001
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution
Control Board
Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
Hearing Officer
100 West
Randolph,
Suite 11-500
Chicago,
IL 60601
Dear
Board
Members,
The Illinois Chapter
of the
American
Fisheries Society
is
a not for profit
professional organization with over 200
members
who support the conservation
and stewardship of fisheries and aquatic ecosVstemsin
Illinois.
We
appreciate the
opportunity to provide
comment
on
proposed new 35
III.
Adm.
Code 301.109,
which would develop
a process
to allow provisional
variances for power
companies
to
exceed tliermal limits for
up to 45 days
in
any calender year.
Illinois’ thermal
regujations were designed to
provide
protection to
aquatic life
while allowing power 9enerating stations to
provide the electricity our industries
and
homes demand.
The cooling
lakes associated
with
our electrical generation
industry provide
a vital recreational resource to
the
people of
Illinois.
In
many cases
these lakes
are modifications of
previously existing
natural systems.
Numerous
studies
have shown that elevated
thermal discharges
can effect the ecology of our
lakes
and
streams.
These
effects
are currently of brief enough
duration to allow
robust fish populations to occur in Illinois’cooling
lakes and
in
our streams
below
thermal
ouiialis.
Recently,
in
1 99~,
provisional variances were
used
in
Coffeen
and
Newton
Lakes,
and
these variances
led directly to
fish kills.
We
believe it
is
inappropriate
to allow variances that will lead to fish kills or damage other
natural
resources.
We agree that there needs to
be
an
opportunity for the
electrical generation
industry to
have emergency
relief from thermal standards to protect the
health
and
welfare of
Illinois citizens.
This
relief should not, however
be extended for
purely
economic or competitive
reasons.
The request
for variance should
be
accompanied
by evidence that the
need
is for
an
emergency within the State
of Illinois
and
is
not
an opport&nity~to sell
power outside the
service
area.
Given the
high risk to
Illinois’
aquatic and recreational resources,
any such
provisional
variance from thermal
standards
should
be stringently controlled and
well documented.
founded
1963
If the
proposed code
is
approved, then
additional
measures
should
be
required:
1)
the petitioner should
be required
to continuously monitor
temperature
and
dissolved
oxygen at all
intakes
and discharges,
and
during the most
critical periods when the
variance
is
in effect visually
inspect
all
effected areas of water every 3 hours throughout the day
and night
when the
variance
is
in
effect.
A plan
should
be
in
place
and
steps
should
be taken to
immediately reduce thermal discharges
if
any evidence
of
a fish
kill
should occur.
During
summertime
conditions,
lethal temperatures are already
present
in the
discharges
of our generating facilities.
Under these conditions motile
fauna
like
fish crowd into those portions
of the
cooling
lake that
have adequate
dissolved oxygen
and temperature to sustain life.
Non-mobile aquatic
organisms
die.
A small
increase
in
discharge temperature
or volume,
or
a decrease
in dissolved oxygen content
under these conditions can
and
has had
disastrous effects.
2) the
petitioner should
develop and
implement
a
response and
recovery plan
approved
by the agency
and the
Illinois
Department of
Natural
Resources to address
any
adverse environmental impact due to
thermal
conditions resulting from
a provisional variance.
3) there
should
be
a
clear delineation of what
Illinois waters will
be
subjected to
provisional thermal variances.
We
are
strongly opposed
to the
issuance of
provisional thermal
variances for direct
discharges
into Illinois
streams, rivers or
Lake Michigan.
These
waters contain
diverse species
assemblages including
coolwater species that could
not withstand
the
additional thermal loading associated
with
provisional
thermal variances.
In
addition, the
Illinois Chapter of the American
Fisheries
Society agrees
with
the additional
reporting requirements
discussed
in the
Illinois
EPA
proposal,
and
asks that these requirements
be mandatory to
any approved
provisional thermal
variances.
Several
new natural
gas fired generating facilities
are currently
under
construction
or have just been completed which
are designed to
meet peak
generating
needs
while introducing
little or
no thermal load to our aquatic systems.
Many of these facilities
are so efficient that no
mixing zone
is required to
meet
existing standards.
Illinois’top 4 power
companies testified recently
that there
is
now adequate generating
capacity to meet
any
conceivable demand
this summer.
This means that at present
adequate capacity exists with current standards,
and
even
more generating capacity
is under construction
within the
State.
Given the
abundant supply of energy within the state
of Illinois,
and the
risks associated with
provisional
variances for thermal effects,
we believe that the
Board
should be very
cautious
in
it’sdevelopment of
rules to
govern them.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide
our organization’scomments to the
Illinois Pollution Control
Board.
We would strongly urge
the
Board to
act to
protect
Illinois’invaluable aquatic
resources
and insure that any
action taken is
in
full
compliance with
the
Clean Water Act.
Sincerely,
~
4
Dan
Sallee
President,
Illinois
AES
702
N.W.
9th
Ave
Aledo,
IL 61231
cc:
Lynn
Padovan,
IEC
Aiben~
Ettinger.
Sierra Club
Jeff Stein,
American
Rivers
John Tranquilli
Mike Hooe
Vic Santucci
Gary
Lutterbie
Dr.
David
Bergerhouse