BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    IN THE MATTER OF: )
    )
    MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL ) R98-9
    (MSWLF) RULES; AMENDMENTS TO 35 ) (Rulemaking - Land)
    ILL. ADM. CODE 811, 813, and 848 )
    The following is the transcript of a hearing held in the
    above-entitled matter, taken stenographically by Lisa Knight
    Cosimini, CSR, RPR-RMR, a notary public within and for the State
    of Illinois, before MARIE TIPSORD, Hearing Officer, at James R.
    Thompson Center, 100 West Randolph, Room 11-500, Chicago,
    Illinois, on the 19th day of November, 1997, commencing at the
    hour of 10:00 a.m.
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    2
    A P P E A R A N C E S :
    HEARING OFFICER:
    MS. MARIE TIPSORD
    100 West Randolph Street
    Suite 11-500
    Chicago, Illinois 60601
    (312) 814-4925
    COUNSEL FOR ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY:
    MS. JUDITH DYAR
    1021 North Grand Avenue East
    Springfield, Illinois 62702
    COUNSEL FOR NATIONAL SOLID WASTES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION:
    MR. PHILLIP R. VAN NESS
    202 Lincoln Square
    Urbana, Illinois 61803-10189
    ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
    DR. G. TANNER GIRARD
    MS. KATHLEEN M. HENNESSEY
    MR. ANAND RAO
    MR. JOSEPH YI
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES:
    MR. EDWIN C. BAKOWSKI
    MR. KENNETH W. LISS
    MS. JOYCE MUNIE
    ALSO PRESENT:
    MR. MARK ALLENDORF
    MR. JAY CORGIAT
    MR. CRAIG S. RAWLINSON
    AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    3
    I N D E X
    Page
    GREETING BY HEARING OFFICER ................................. 4
    GREETING BY DR. GIRARD ...................................... 6
    STATEMENT BY MS. DYAR ....................................... 6
    STATEMENT BY MR. VAN NESS ................................... 9
    QUESTION BY MR. RAWLINSON ................................... 11
    QUESTION BY MR. CORGIAT ..................................... 12
    QUESTION BY MR. RAWLINSON ................................... 15
    * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    E X H I B I T S
    EXHIBIT NUMBER 5 ............................................ 7
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    4
    1 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: I have 10:00. So, I think we'll
    2 go ahead and start.
    3 Good morning. My name is Marie Tipsord, and I've been
    4 appointed by the board to serve as hearing officer in this
    5 proceeding entitled: In The Matter of Municipal Solid Waste
    6 Landfill Rules; Amendments to 35 Ill. Admin. Code 811, 813, and
    7 848, Docket Number R98-9.
    8 To my left is Dr. Tanner Girard, one of the presiding board
    9 members assigned to this matter. And to his left is Kathleen
    10 Hennessey, one of the board members -- one of our board members.
    11 Also, member Joseph Yi is here with us today.
    12 In addition, we have John Knittle, Joseph Yi's assistant;
    13 Cindy Ervin, who is Chairman Manning's assistant, since Chairman
    14 Manning couldn't be with us today. And Anand Rao is here as
    15 well. And I think that covers the board's staff I see here.
    16 This is the second hearing in this proceeding, and the
    17 first hearing was held in Springfield on October 27, 1997.
    18 This is a joint proposal filed on August 11th of 1997 by
    19 the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and the National
    20 Solid Wastes Management Association.
    21 Along with the proposal, the proponents filed a motion
    22 asking the Board to limit the scope of this proceeding. On
    23 August 21, 1997, the Board accepted the proposal, and I will
    24 quote from that order.
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    5
    1 Quote: The Board notes the proponents' desire to proceed
    2 with this rulemaking in an expeditious manner, and their
    3 concern's that expansion of the scope of the proposal to include
    4 other regulatory wish lists would unduly delay the Board's
    5 deliberation. However, the Board will not limit the discussion
    6 of any regulatory alternatives proposed in public testimony or
    7 comment concerning subject matters addressed by this proposal.
    8 Therefore, at this time, the Board agrees to limit the
    9 scope of this proceeding in that the Board will not entertain
    10 requests from other parties to expand the list of sections
    11 proposed for amendment. The Board will accept comments on the
    12 proposed language for the sections opened in the proposal,
    13 including any potential suggestions regarding alternatives,
    14 closed quote.
    15 Therefore, the Board has limited the scope of this
    16 proceeding, and I will limit the scope of the hearing consistent
    17 with the Board's order.
    18 Outside the door are sign-up sheets for notice and service
    19 lists. If you wish to be on the service list, you will receive
    20 all pleadings and all pre-filed testimony in this proceeding.
    21 In addition, you must serve all of your filings on the persons
    22 on the service list.
    23 If you wish to be on the notice list, you will receive all
    24 board and hearing office orders in this rulemaking.
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    6
    1 If you have any questions about which list you wish to be
    2 placed on, please see me at a break. There are also copies of
    3 the current notice and service lists outside the door.
    4 The Board received pre-filed testimony from the Agency in
    5 this proceeding. We will allow specific questions to each
    6 person testifying; and if there's -- if they would like to do a
    7 summary of their testimony, we will do that as well, and we'll
    8 begin with the pre-filed testimony.
    9 After we finish with the pre-filed testimony, we will
    10 proceed with anyone else who might wish to present testimony
    11 today and questioning of those -- of that testimony.
    12 At this time, I would like to ask Dr. Girard if he wishes
    13 to say anything further or --
    14 DR. GIRARD: Well, thank you. I would like to welcome
    15 everyone to the board. Please forgive us for the cramped
    16 quarters. You can see we're upgrading our computer system, and
    17 we don't have very much space here to do the work; and we look
    18 forward to an efficient hearing this morning. Thank you.
    19 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: And with that, we'll proceed to
    20 the Agency's testimony. Ms. Dyer.
    21 MS. DYER: Good morning. My name is Judy Dyer. I'm here
    22 today on behalf of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
    23 and I'm starting to get a little hoarse. So, I'm hoping that my
    24 voice will hold out.
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    7
    1 I'd like to introduce three witnesses on behalf of the
    2 Agency here with me today. On my immediate left is Joyce Munie.
    3 And on her left, is Ken Liss. And on my right is Ed Bakowski.
    4 As the hearing officer mentioned, the Agency pre-filed
    5 testimony, some brief supplemental testimony, addressing
    6 questions from the Board at the last hearing. Rather than
    7 having our witnesses summarize their testimony, if it's okay
    8 with the Board, I'd like to move that their testimony be entered
    9 as if read in the record.
    10 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Let's swear the witnesses first
    11 before we do that.
    12 MS. DYER: Okay.
    13 (Whereupon, Kenneth Liss, Edwin Bakowski
    14 and Joyce Munie were duly sworn.)
    15 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. Is there any objection to
    16 accepting the testimony as if read?
    17 (No response.)
    18 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Seeing none, we will mark the
    19 testimony of Kenneth Liss, Edwin Bakowski, and Joyce Munie as
    20 Exhibit Number 5.
    21 (Brief pause in proceedings.)
    22 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Is there any objection to
    23 admitting it as one exhibit, or would the proponents prefer that
    24 we admit them each individually?
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    8
    1 MS. DYER: One.
    2 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: All right. We'll admit it as one
    3 exhibit then.
    4 And did you have copies of that available?
    5 MS. DYER: Yeah. I wanted to mention that there are copies
    6 outside the door of our supplemental testimony; and before I
    7 offer our witnesses as a panel for questions, I want to point
    8 out one typo.
    9 In the supplemental testimony of Kenneth W. Liss, under
    10 Section 811.309, the suggested or recommended language, we've
    11 struck out the word "with," and it should not be struck out.
    12 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. Thank you.
    13 And at this time, are there any questions of the Agency's
    14 witnesses on the testimony? Or, actually, are there any
    15 questions at this time?
    16 (No response.)
    17 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: All right. Seeing none, we'll
    18 move along.
    19 Did the Agency have any other testimony it wished to
    20 present today that was not pre-filed?
    21 MS. DYER: No. The Agency will be addressing a written
    22 comment, additional issues raised by the Board, as indicated by
    23 the Agency at the last hearing.
    24 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. Thank you.
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    9
    1 Is there anyone else who wants to present testimony today?
    2 MR. VAN NESS: Well, let me first introduce myself on the
    3 record. My name is Phillip Van Ness. I'm representing the
    4 National Solid Wastes Management Association.
    5 To my left is Mr. Tom Hilbert; and we would not be
    6 tendering additional pre-filed testimony on his part, but we
    7 would first remind the Court, for the record, that Mr. Hilbert
    8 has pre-filed testimony previously. And copies of that
    9 pre-filed testimony are also available on the small table
    10 outside the door to this room.
    11 And we would ask that Mr. Hilbert be sworn in as well as a
    12 witness so that he can be incorporated into the panel as a whole
    13 for purposes of fielding questions from board members and staff
    14 and any members of the public that may be interested.
    15 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: All right. May we have him
    16 sworn?
    17 (Whereupon, Tom Hilbert was duly sworn.)
    18 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: All right. Anything further
    19 or --
    20 MR. VAN NESS: Nothing further.
    21 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Is there -- are there any
    22 questions, then, of the panel from the Board or anyone here
    23 regarding the proposal as filed with the Board?
    24 (No response.)
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    10
    1 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. I don't see any.
    2 Was there any other business that you had to present today?
    3 (No response.)
    4 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Then I'm going to ask, if you
    5 don't mind, if we go off the record for a few minutes but we
    6 stay convened for at least the next 25 minutes or so, in case
    7 someone from the public does wander in late that may have
    8 questions, if you don't have an objection to that.
    9 MR. RAWLINSON: I think that's a good idea. I'm expecting
    10 a few other people who will be here.
    11 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. All right. Could you
    12 identify yourself, please?
    13 MR. RAWLINSON: Craig Rawlinson with STS.
    14 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: All right. Let's, let's recess
    15 then, and we'll recess until, let's say, 10:30; and we'll
    16 reconvene at 10:30 and see if there's anyone else that may have
    17 questions. And we'll see where we're at then. Okay.
    18 (Recess, 10:10 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.)
    19 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Let's go back on the record.
    20 I notice we've had some people join us. Just to summarize,
    21 the Agency has submitted pre-filed testimony which we've
    22 admitted as an exhibit, and the panel has all been sworn and are
    23 available to answer any questions regarding the proposal on
    24 R98-9.
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    11
    1 And are there any questions?
    2 (No response.)
    3 MR. RAWLINSON: I'd like to make one comment. Would it be
    4 possible now with the passage of the geologists' registration
    5 requirements to recognize geologists who are submitting certain
    6 portions of landfill reporting, be it quarterly reporting or
    7 some sig. mods., significant modifications, under the
    8 geologists' registration number as opposed to having had a
    9 professional engineer certify all work?
    10 I'm talking about geology-related, nondesign aspects of the
    11 landfill reporting.
    12 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: I need you to identify yourself.
    13 MR. RAWLINSON: Craig Rawlinson with STS Consultants,
    14 Deerfield.
    15 I think before when this was introduced, maybe the
    16 geologists' certification wasn't in place at that time.
    17 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Is there a comment from the
    18 panel?
    19 MR. VAN NESS: I guess my offering on that, Madam Hearing
    20 Officer, is that I don't know that we take a position
    21 particularly, except that this is, obviously, beyond the scope
    22 of the rulemaking pursuant to the Board's order.
    23 My understanding was that this would be technically off
    24 limits in terms of a proposal. We're not taking any particular
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    12
    1 position on that. The registration certification of a
    2 professional geologist simply has not been a subject discussed
    3 or considered heretofore for some of the reasons that were
    4 mentioned. It didn't exist before.
    5 So, I guess I would say that we have no position in terms
    6 of the substance of it procedurally. It may not be the
    7 appropriate thing to do. But I would leave that to the Board's
    8 discretion as to whether they want to open it up to that.
    9 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Does the Agency have any comment?
    10 MR. BAKOWSKI: Yeah. I just believe at this time the
    11 Agency is aware of its recent passage, and I think it's just
    12 under review right now as to how it's going to impact what we do
    13 at the Agency.
    14 I don't think we have any official position on it yet.
    15 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. Do you have a follow-up,
    16 or --
    17 MR. RAWLINSON: No, I don't. I just would like it
    18 considered by the Board.
    19 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay.
    20 MR. CORGIAT: I have a procedural question.
    21 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Could you identify -- excuse me.
    22 Could you identify yourself?
    23 MR. CORGIAT: Sure. I'm Mr. Jay Corgiat.
    24 I had a procedure question. Are we trying to focus only on
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    13
    1 the language that's been changed or on these parts of the -- of
    2 the regulations, I guess, that are changing?
    3 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: The Board's order basically
    4 indicated that we would accept comments on the proposed language
    5 for the sections opened, and we are limiting the scope of the
    6 proceeding in that we will not add any new sections.
    7 MR. CORGIAT: Okay. I guess with that in mind, I have a
    8 question about the, in the gas treatment section. It says
    9 that --
    10 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Could you identify it by section
    11 number, please?
    12 MR. CORGIAT: Sure. 811.312(b): Except as allowed in
    13 subsection (g), which is for gas processing facilities that are
    14 off site, it says, basically, that all the landfill gas
    15 processing equipment, to paraphrase, must remain under the
    16 control of the operator and shall be considered part of the
    17 waste disposal facility.
    18 I wondered how the EPA was gonna handle a lot of these
    19 third-party landfill gas energy companies and how they're going
    20 to be covered in the regs. Will they be considered an operator,
    21 or can there still be a separate operator from the land -- from
    22 the third-party vendor?
    23 MS. MUNIE: You want me just to answer?
    24 MR. BAKOWSKI: You want to do it?
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    14
    1 MS. MUNIE: Sure.
    2 Right now, a third-party operator who would operate a
    3 landfill gas energy facility on the landfill facility would have
    4 to have a permit as the owner of the land, being the landfill
    5 owner; and then the operator of the facility could be either
    6 identified as the third party, or it could be the operator of
    7 the landfill, depending on how the landfill chose to set up
    8 their contractual agreement there. That's really entirely a
    9 contractual agreement.
    10 And the permit itself, however, is held by the landfill and
    11 is the responsibility of the landfill owner/operator.
    12 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Are there any other questions for
    13 the panel?
    14 (No response.)
    15 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Did you have anything?
    16 (No response.)
    17 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. All right. Seeing none,
    18 then we'll proceed to the next order of business, and that is
    19 that this rulemaking has not yet been proposed for first notice
    20 with the, under the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act, and
    21 that would -- the Board's next step would be to determine
    22 whether or not it merits proceeding and, if so, to do that
    23 first-notice proposal.
    24 So, at this time, I would like to set up an
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    15
    1 agreed-upon schedule for filing comments prior to the Board
    2 taking an action on either proceeding to first notice; or the
    3 Board has the option, of course, of dismissing a proposal if it
    4 doesn't merit proceeding.
    5 So, let's go off the record for just a second and start
    6 talking about dates.
    7 (Discussion off the record.)
    8 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Let's go back on the record.
    9 Before we set the final comment date, we do have one more
    10 question. Go ahead.
    11 MR. RAWLINSON: Okay. My question is: This semiannual
    12 monitoring, which list of constituents would that reflect?
    13 Would it be the burden of the applicant to propose a list, or
    14 would it be subtitle (d), Appendix 1 list that's currently
    15 required by the Federal Regulations by default?
    16 MS. MUNIE: Which section are you referring to here? Is it
    17 the 319? I just want to make sure it's the 319 and not the 309.
    18 MR. RAWLINSON: Yes, 811.319(b) -- wait. I'm sorry.
    19 MS. MUNIE: (a)(1)(A).
    20 MR. RAWLINSON: (a)(1)(A), yeah.
    21 MR. LISS: And the question is: You'd like to know if that
    22 includes or does not include the appendix side list?
    23 MR. RAWLINSON: We just want to know: Is it up to the
    24 applicant, then, at that point when they go forward to request a
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    16
    1 switch to semiannual after they have their background to five?
    2 Would it be up to them to propose a list again? Would it be an
    3 Appendix 1 reasonable list? Or would it be something that's --
    4 MR. LISS: Yeah. I anticipated that it would be whatever's
    5 in your permit; and if you wanted to propose at that time
    6 something different --
    7 MR. RAWLINSON: So, you're thinking it would be (g)(2), the
    8 annual list or the routine list that's in the permits?
    9 MR. LISS: The annual list is, is done annually anyway.
    10 So, I don't think we make anyone do that semiannually.
    11 MR. RAWLINSON: Okay.
    12 MR. LISS: So, it would be whatever is in your permit for
    13 quarterly; and at the time, when you wanted to get reduction in
    14 sampling, we would probably just use that list unless you
    15 propose something different.
    16 So, the annual list isn't quarterly. So, therefore, it's
    17 not part of this.
    18 Does that answer your question?
    19 MR. RAWLINSON: It's just the quarterly list --
    20 MR. ALLENDORF: For one of the semiannual events, and then
    21 the annual list for the second semiannual --
    22 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: You need to identify yourself.
    23 MR. ALLENDORF: Mr. Mark Allendorf with Browning-Ferris
    24 Industries.
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    17
    1 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Could you repeat what you said?
    2 MR. ALLENDORF: Sure.
    3 My understanding is that the first semiannual event -- or
    4 one of the semiannual events would be the typical short (g)(1)
    5 list, if you will, that are typically in the permits; and then
    6 the annual list would be the second semiannual event.
    7 MR. LISS: Correct.
    8 And I can clarify that for the record. When he indicates
    9 (g)(1) or (g)(2), that's the Agency's method of identifying
    10 quarterly parameters versus annual parameters.
    11 The (g)(1) would be the constituents that we routinely
    12 monitor quarterly; so, they would be going off. Under this
    13 proposal, you could -- that list or some other list that you
    14 would propose would remain, but it would go quar-- semiannually.
    15 And then once a year at one of those semiannual events would be
    16 the (g)(2) or annual list.
    17 MR. RAO: And just a clarification, this (g)(2) list that
    18 you just mentioned, is it a more comprehensive list than the
    19 (g)(1) list?
    20 MR. LISS: Yes.
    21 MR. RAO: Okay.
    22 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. Are there any other
    23 questions?
    24 (No response.)
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    18
    1 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. And also, just to be sure,
    2 there's no one else here who wishes to present testimony today;
    3 is that correct?
    4 (No response.)
    5 HEARING OFFICER TIPSORD: Okay. All right. Then after
    6 discussion off the record, we will set December 19th for the
    7 deadline to file comments prior to the Board's proceeding with
    8 this rulemaking either to first notice or whatever action is
    9 taken.
    10 That is mailbox rule so that they can be mailed on December
    11 19th. The Board will consider any comments received as up to
    12 that date when it proceeds next with the rulemaking. This does
    13 not mean that comments will be cut off as of December 19th; it
    14 means merely that to ensure that we consider them before we move
    15 to the next step, you need to have them in by December 19th.
    16 After we -- if the Board goes to first notice, after that,
    17 there's an additional 45-day public comment period at a minimum;
    18 and we can also at that time revisit the issue of a hearing,
    19 another hearing at that point in time.
    20 So, if there's nothing further, I want to thank you all for
    21 coming, and I appreciate it. I think you've done a fine job,
    22 and I look forward to seeing your comments.
    23 Thank you very much. We're adjourned.
    24 HEARING CONCLUDED AT 10:50 A.M.
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    19
    1 STATE OF ILLINOIS )
    ) SS
    2 COUNTY OF C O O K )
    3
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
    5
    6 I, LISA KNIGHT COSIMINI, CSR, RPR-RMR, Notary Public
    7 in and for the State of Illinois, do hereby certify that the
    8 foregoing transcript, consisting of pages 1 through 18, both
    9 inclusive, constitutes a true and accurate transcript of the
    10 original stenographic notes recorded by me of the foregoing
    11 proceedings had before Marie Tipsord, Hearing Officer for the
    12 Illinois Pollution Control Board, on the 19th day of November,
    13 1997.
    14
    15 Dated this 2nd day of December, 1997.
    16
    17
    18 _______________________________________
    LISA KNIGHT COSIMINI, CSR, RPR-RMR
    19 Illinois License No. 084-002998
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    L. A. REPORTING (312) 419-9292

    Back to top