1
    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    CITIZENS UNITED FOR A )
    RESPONSIBLE ENVIRONMENT, )
    )
    Petitioner, ) PCB 96-238
    )
    v. )
    )
    BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES )
    OF ILLINOIS, INC., and ) July 16, 1996
    VILLAGE BOARD OF THE VILLAGE )
    OF DAVIS JUNCTION, ILLINOIS, ) Davis Junction
    ) Village Hall,
    Respondent. ) Davis Junction, IL
    Hearing commenced at 9:25 a.m.
    BEFORE:
    HEARING OFFICER MICHAEL L. WALLACE,
    Illinois Pollution Control Board,
    600 South Second Street, Suite 402,
    Springfield, Illinois, 62704
    REPORTER:
    Carrie L. Vaske,
    Certified Shorthand Reporter,
    Ashton, Illinois
    ITV

    2
    APPEARANCES:
    ATTORNEY KIM KRAHENBUHL,
    of the firm of Williams & McCarthy,
    601 Washington Street,
    Oregon, Illinois, 61061
    Counsel for CURE.
    ATTORNEY GERALD CALLAGHAN and
    ATTORNEY ANN ZWICK,
    of the firm of Freeborn & Peters,
    311 South Wacker Drive,
    Chicago, Illinois, 60606-6677
    Counsel for BFI.
    ATTORNEY DENNIS SCHUMACHER and
    ATTORNEY BRIAN BUZARD,
    of the Law Offices of Dennis Schumacher,
    111 East Hitt Street,
    Mt. Morris, Illinois, 61054
    Counsel for the Village.
    ALSO PRESENT: Tim Hess, Concerned Citizen and
    James Ambroso of BFI.
    ITV

    3
    MR. WALLACE: Pursuant to the direction
    of the Illinois Pollution Control Board I
    now call docket PCB 96-238. This is
    Citizens United for a Responsible
    Environment versus Browning-Ferris
    Industries of Illinois, Inc., and the
    Village Board of the Village of Davis
    Junction, Illinois.
    If I could I have appearances for
    the record, please, for the Petitioner.
    MR. KRAHENBUHL: Kim Krahenbuhl,
    K-r-a-h-e-n-b-u-h-l, Attorney for Citizens
    United for a Responsible Environment.
    MR. WALLACE: For the City, please or
    the Village.
    MR. SCHUMACHER: Dennis Schumacher,
    Brian Buzard, Law Offices of Dennis
    Schumacher for the Village of Davis
    Junction.
    MR. WALLACE: And for BFI.
    MR. CALLAGHAN: Gerald Callaghan and
    Ann Zwick from the law firm of Freeborn and
    ITV

    4
    Peters, and also James Ambroso from
    Browning-Ferris Industries.
    MR. WALLACE: Let the record reflect
    there are no other appearances at today's
    hearing. Are there any members of the
    public that wish to be noted as being
    present this morning?
    MR. HESS: Yes.
    MR. WALLACE: Your name, sir.
    MR. HESS: Tim Hess, H-e-s-s.
    MR. WALLACE: Anyone else? All right,
    thank you. I received yesterday afternoon
    the stipulation which apparently pretty well
    takes care of this morning's activities.
    Mr. Krahenbuhl, do you want to
    address that at all?
    MR. KRAHENBUHL: Yes. The Petitioner
    has no evidence or information to provide
    today. We will stand on our brief and our
    argument will be made in the brief we will
    file with the Pollution Control Board I
    believe in two weeks.
    ITV

    5
    MR. WALLACE: Mr. Callaghan?
    MR. CALLAGHAN: We will do the same.
    Browning-Ferris will rely on the record that
    was presented at the local siting hearing
    and make all argument in its brief as well.
    MR. WALLACE: And Mr. Schumacher for
    the Village?
    MR. SCHUMACHER: And I think we're just
    taking the position of traveling along with
    the other parties in this matter just to
    respond to anything as far as any procedural
    issues that we feel that we need to address,
    but other than that, I think we're kind of
    viewing ourselves as a neutral party in this
    proceeding.
    MR. WALLACE: All right, so there being
    no witnesses to be called, no further
    evidence to be introduced at this time,
    before me here on the podium, I don't know
    exactly how many exhibits, these are the
    exhibits that were not included in the
    record submitted to the Board.
    ITV

    6
    It's my intention to take these
    with me to the Board's office in Chicago
    today. I don't have an exact num -- the
    exact numbers. I will rely on the chart
    that was submitted with the motion if that's
    agreeable to everyone.
    MR. CALLAGHAN: Mr. Wallace, for the
    record, if I may, many of the exhibits --
    these are the actual large size exhibits.
    Many of them were in reduced form admitted
    into evidence at the hearing, and it was
    simply the full-sized version that I think
    the parties agreed that it would be easier
    for the record not to have them, but they
    certainly, I think would be of assistance to
    the Board in making its decision.
    MR. WALLACE: All right. Do you think
    that all of them have been reduced or
    just --
    MR. CALLAGHAN: No, some of them I
    think were actual -- and I don't have my
    complete witness list. For example, there
    ITV

    7
    is -- BFI Exhibit No. 51 is a chart that was
    produced at the hearing. That was admitted
    into evidence, I believe. All of this would
    be reflected in the record as to those
    exhibits which were admitted and those which
    were produced subsequently as issues arose
    at the hearing, but certainly in the
    transcript of the proceedings you'd be able
    to tell which ones. And if you would like
    we could provide you with an exhibit list as
    we understand it.
    MR. WALLACE: That would probably be
    convenient for the Board.
    MR. CALLAGHAN: Sure, okay.
    MR. WALLACE: As you're aware, I don't
    write up the order. The Board itself will
    issue the opinion and order, and having
    these exhibits in the Chicago office for
    their reference may be helpful to the Board
    members as they write the opinion.
    MR. SCHUMACHER: May I ask for today
    for this proceeding, would it be possible or
    ITV

    8
    do we need to identify the exhibits today
    that you're taking to distinguish those that
    may have been considered or reviewed prior
    to this or explaining which is where.
    MS. ZWICK: They were all listed in the
    motion. We filed a motion.
    MR. SCHUMACHER: All of these that are
    here today?
    MS. ZWICK: Yeah. We filed a motion to
    exclude these from having to make extra
    copies so they're all listed.
    MR. SCHUMACHER: So they're all
    identified.
    MS. ZWICK: They're all identified.
    MR. SCHUMACHER: Thank you.
    MR. WALLACE: If we go by Exhibit A of
    the attachment to the motion to waive the
    requirement to file copies of certain
    documents comprising the record, I assume
    that that would be the exhibits --
    MS. ZWICK: Yep, those are them.
    MR. WALLACE: -- present today.
    ITV

    9
    MR. SCHUMACHER: Okay, good. I just
    want to make sure we have a record showing
    that.
    MS. ZWICK: Yeah, we put down -- we
    tried to put down the exhibit number from
    the hearing so I don't know if they need
    another list or not. That's it.
    MR. WALLACE: That sounds like that
    would be fine then, and since these are the
    only existing copies, according to the
    Board's order they do become part of the
    record submitted to the Board. I do not
    know if they are returnable or not. You can
    make a request after the opinion and order
    is issued for a request for the exhibits to
    be returned if you so desire, and the Board
    will rule upon that. That's entirely up to
    you. I know it's been done in the past.
    I quite frankly am not sure what
    the Board's requirements are on keeping
    these types of exhibits, so I leave that
    with you as an option if you were to desire
    ITV

    10
    to try to get them back at some point in
    time down the road.
    The briefing schedule was set.
    Anyone have any amendments or is that
    acceptable as is?
    MR. CALLAGHAN: We would request one
    thing, Mr. Wallace, and that is because I
    believe there's a two week turn around, we
    have two weeks to respond to the
    Petitioner's brief, if we could get that
    faxed to us it would certainly help us in
    preparing our brief. So I would ask
    Mr. Krahenbuhl as a matter of courtesy if
    he'd be willing to do that, and if not -- we
    will be glad to do the same to you.
    MR. KRAHENBUHL: We'll have it to you
    by the date, because we're going to file it
    before the date.
    MR. CALLAGHAN: Fine.
    MR. KRAHENBUHL: Because I'm going to
    be gone on vacation.
    MR. CALLAGHAN: We do have priorities.
    ITV

    11
    MR. WALLACE: So then the initial brief
    is due July 29th, a response August 12th and
    a reply August the 19th. Those are the
    dates established.
    The deadline in this case has been
    waived to September 19th. That is the Board
    meeting for that. The second Board meeting
    of September is on the 19th, so that the
    decision should be entered either -- well,
    I'm assuming the Board will act on this case
    on that date. Absent any additional waiver
    the Board has to act upon that date. Is
    there any --
    MS. ZWICK: Do you know what time that
    hearing will be, the Board meeting is?
    MR. WALLACE: The Board convenes at
    10:30.
    MS. ZWICK: 10:30.
    MR. WALLACE: BFI is not -- you're not
    waiving the deadline any further out at this
    time.
    MR. CALLAGHAN: Right.
    ITV

    12
    MR. WALLACE: All right. Anything else
    from the parties, Mr. Krahenbuhl?
    MR. KRAHENBUHL: I have nothing
    further.
    MR. WALLACE: Mr. Callaghan?
    MR. CALLAGHAN: Nothing.
    MR. WALLACE: Mr. Schumacher?
    MR. SCHUMACHER: Nothing further.
    MR. WALLACE: Mr. Hess, do you wish to
    make a statement as a member of the public
    for the record?
    MR. HESS: No, my comments will take
    care of that.
    MR. WALLACE: I'm sorry, sir?
    MR. HESS: The comments I'm filing will
    take care of that.
    MR. WALLACE: Okay. You wish to file
    comments to the Pollution Control --
    MR. HESS: Be written comments as per
    the -- I don't exactly remember the number
    of the document that was filed in the local
    papers here.
    ITV

    13
    MR. WALLACE: Okay. Our docket number
    is PCB 96-238.
    MR. HESS: It's a different issue. I
    realize that. Sorry.
    MR. WALLACE: I'm merely asking you if
    you want to make --
    MR. HESS: No, sir.
    MR. WALLACE: -- any oral comments for
    the record today --
    MR. HESS: No, thank you.
    MR. WALLACE: -- on the siting process
    for the Orchard Hill Site.
    MR. HESS: No, thank you.
    MR. WALLACE: Thank you. I believe
    that's all. Thank you very much. This
    record is closed.
    (The hearing was concluded at 9:36
    a.m.)
    ITV

    14
    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    CITIZENS UNITED FOR A )
    RESPONSIBLE ENVIRONMENT, )
    )
    Petitioner, ) PCB 96-238
    )
    v. )
    )
    BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES )
    OF ILLINOIS, INC., and )
    VILLAGE BOARD OF THE VILLAGE )
    OF DAVIS JUNCTION, ILLINOIS, )
    )
    Respondent. )
    I, Carrie L. Vaske, hereby certify
    that I am a Certified Shorthand Reporter of
    the State of Illinois; that I am the one who
    by order and at the direction of the Hearing
    Officer, Michael Wallace, reported in
    shorthand the proceedings had or required to
    be kept in the above-entitled case; and that
    the above and foregoing is a full, true and
    complete transcript of my said shorthand
    notes so taken.
    Dated at Ashton, Illinois, this
    18th day of July, 1996.
    Carrie L. Vaske
    Registered Professional Reporter
    Certified Shorthand Reporter
    Illinois License No. 084-003845
    8991 South Prairie Road
    Ashton, Illinois 61006
    ITV

    Back to top