W:\HTDOCS\PCB\OPINION\Z961107\96243A.DOC
11/18/96 3:10 PM
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November 7, 1996
RESIDENTS AGAINST A POLLUTED
ENVIRONMENT AND THE EDMUND B.
THORNTON FOUNDATION,
Petitioner,
v.
COUNTY OF LASALLE AND LANDCOMP
CORPORATION.,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PCB 96-243
(Pollution Control Facility Siting
Appeal)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by M. McFawn):
This matter is before the Board on several filings. First, on October 8, 1996,
resopndent LandComp Corporation (LandComp) filed a motion for rule 308(a) certification
and for a stay of the Board’s September 19, 1996 order in this matter. Second, also on
October 8, 1996, LandComp filed a motion requesting that the Board dismiss its appeal of the
Board’s September 19, 1996 decision. Third, on October 15, 1996, the National Solid Waste
Management Association (SWMA) filed a motion for leave to file an
amicus curiae
brief in
support of LandComp’s motion for rule 308(a) certification and request for a stay,
accompanied by its proposed brief. Fourth, on October 21, 1996, petitioners Residents
Against a Polluted Environment and the Edmund B. Thornton Foundation (collectively,
Residents) filed an objection to LandComp’s request for rule 308 certification. Finally,
LandComp filed a reply memorandum to the petitioners’ objection to rule 308(a) certification,
accompanied by a motion for leave to file.
Initially, we note that LandComp’s motion to dismiss its appeal is moot, since the Third
District Appellate Court granted LandComp’s motion to dismiss its petition for review on
October 18, 1996. We will therefore not further address this motion.
In its motion for rule 308 certification, LandComp asks that the Board issue an order in
accordance with 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.304 and Supreme Court Rule 308(a), certifying an
appeal of the Board’s September 19, 1996 order in this matter. Supreme Court Rule 308(a)
provides:
When the trial court, in making an interlocutory order not otherwise appealable,
finds that the order involves a question of law as to which there is substantial ground
for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially
advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, the court shall so state in writing,
identifying the question of law involved. Such a statement may be made at the time of
2
the entry of the order or thereafter on the court’s own motion or on motion of any
party. The Appellate Court may thereupon in its discretion allow an appeal from the
order.
The Board, in its procedural rules, specifically provides for certification of
interlocutory appeals in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 308(a). (
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code
101.304.) The Board’s authority to certify interlocutory appeals is also supported by judicial
interpretation. (
See
People v. Pollution Control Board, 129 Ill. App. 3d 958, 473 N.E.2d 452
(1st Dist. 1984) (decision on certified interlocutory appeal); and Getty Synthetic Fuel v.
Pollution Control Board, 104 Ill. App. 3d 285, 60 432 N.E.2d 942 (1st Dist 1982) (finding
Supreme Court rules 301 through 320 and 327 through 373 generally applicable to appeals
from Board decisions.)
In support of the motion for certification, LandComp states that the Board’s September
19, 1996 order departed from important precedent and raised questions of law as to which
there are substantial grounds for differences of opinion.
The Illinois Supreme Court has indicated that Rule 308 appeals are to be allowed only
in certain exceptional circumstances. (People v. Pollution Control Board, 473 N.E.2d at 456,
citing
People
ex rel.
Mosley v. Carey, 74 Ill.2d 527 (1979).) Thus, Rule 308 should be
strictly construed and sparingly exercised. People v. Pollution Control Board, 473 N.E.2d at
456.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, hereby certify that
the above order was adopted on the _____ day of ___________, 1996, by a vote of
______________.
___________________________________
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board