ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL ROARD
    March
    5,
    1981
    VILLAGE OF HANOVER PARK,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 80—221
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    )
    AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by
    3. Anderson):
    This matter comes before the Board on the petition of the
    Village of Hanover Park
    (Village),
    filed December
    5,
    1980 as
    amended December 23,
    1980,
    for variance from the 1.0 mg/i barium
    concentration limit of Rule 304(B)(4) of Chapter
    6:
    Public Water
    Supplies.
    The Board has previously granted variance from this
    standard in two proceedings, the records of which have been incorp-
    orated into this action in Village of Hanover Park v.
    IEPA,
    PCB 77-
    348,
    29 PCB 439, March
    30,
    1978; and PCB 79—199,
    37 PCB 135, January
    10,
    1980.
    On January
    22,
    1981, the Agency filed its Recommendation
    in support of grant of variance, with conditions.
    Hearing was
    waived and none has been held.
    As noted in the Board’s latest Opinion,
    two of petitioner’s
    six wells
    (4 deep,
    2 shallow) contain barium in excess of the
    barium standard,
    (Wells
    #2 and 4).
    While
    water from Wells
    #2 and
    4 is mixed with water from the rest of Petitioner’s system, the
    Petitioner
    feels that compliance cannot be achieved by commingling
    (blending) without installing additional transmission lines and
    limiting use of well
    #4, which
    is needed to serve ongoing demand
    (37 PCB
    135,
    136).
    The Village’s updated estimated treatment
    costs, which to the Agency appear “higher than usual
    ...but with-
    in the range of possibility,” are a)
    for an ion exchange system,
    $1,262,000 capital cost,
    $40,800 annual operation and maintenance
    (0
    & M),
    b)
    for a lime softening system,
    $3,800,700 capital cost,
    $79,200 annual 0
    & M, and c) for a chemical precipitation system,
    $3,435,100 capital cost and $155,900 annual 0 & M.
    As a result of the studies and reports commissioned by the
    Village as part of its past compliance efforts,
    the Village entered
    into an enforceable agreement to join the Northwest Suburban Water
    System
    (Venture).
    Venture is a regional public water
    supply, cur-
    rently including
    8 municipalities and a utility company, created
    to
    develop
    “a legally, technically, professionally and financially
    sound program to construct a water transmission pipeline system”
    41—43

    to transport treated Lake Michigan water to its members.
    As
    of
    July 25,
    1980,
    Venture had completed two/thirds of its preliminary
    planning program, and was entering into the final phase of prepa-
    ration of preliminary engineering and financial plans.
    Based on
    the projected schedule,
    a Venture pipeline could be
    in operation
    in
    1985.
    Although the Village does not estimate total costs to
    it of the Venture project, as of December,
    1980 it had spent
    $23,000
    as part of its commitment to the project
    (affidavit of
    Village Manager Dawson).
    The Agency supports grant of variance until January
    1,
    1986,
    the deadline for exemptions under the Safe Drinking Water Act
    (SDWA), 42 U.S.C.
    §1416,
    as recently extended by P.L.
    96—502,
    for
    water supplies that have binding commitments to become part of a
    regional water supply.
    Although noting that it has never been
    established under federal
    law exactly what constitutes
    a “binding
    commitment”
    or a “regional water supply”, the Agency believes that
    the Village’s entry into the Venture arrangement satisfies the
    policy and intent of the SDWA.
    The Board finds that the Village’s entry into the Venture
    agreement satisfies the SDWA requirement.
    In light of the high
    cost to the Village of treatment of its current water supply,
    the
    lack of demonstrated threats to health from consumption of barium
    at the levels
    in the Village’s water, and finally the Village’s
    demonstrated commitment to the Venture regional water project,
    the
    Board finds that denial of variance would impose an arbitrary or
    unreasonable hardship.
    The requested variance from Rule 304 of
    Chapter
    6 is hereby granted until January
    1,
    1986,
    subject to the
    conditions outlined in the attached Order.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    1)
    Petitioner,
    the Village of Hanover Park,
    is hereby granted
    variance from the 1.0 mg/i barium standard of Rule 304(B)(4)
    of
    Chapter
    6:
    Public Water Supplies until January
    1,
    1986,
    subject to
    the following conditions:
    A)
    Petitioner shall continue to perform its obligations
    as outlined in the Northwest Suburban Water System (Venture) Agree-
    ment, as
    it may be from time to time amended,
    and shall replace its
    current water supply with Venture—supplied water as expeditiously
    as is practicable.
    B)
    Petitioner shall take all reasonable measures with
    its existing equipment
    to minimize the level of barium in its
    finished water.
    C)
    Pursuant to Rule 313(D)(1)
    of Chapter
    6, on or
    before June 30,
    1981 and every three months thereafter Petitioner
    ~iillsend to each user of its public water supply a written notice
    to the effect that Petitioner has been granted by the Pollution
    41—44

    Control Board a variance from
    the
    1.0
    mg/I
    maximum
    barium standard.
    The notice
    shall state the average content
    of barium in samples
    taken
    since the last notice period during which samples were taken.
    2)
    Within forty—five days of the date of this Order,
    Petitioner
    shall execute and forward to David L.
    Rieser, Technical
    Advisor, Enforcement Programs,
    Illinois Environmental Protection
    agency,
    2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield,
    Illinois 62706,
    a Certif-
    icate of Acceptance and ~greement to he bound to all terms
    and
    conditions of
    this variance.
    This forty—five day period shall
    he
    held
    in abeyance for any period this matter
    is being appealed.
    The
    form of the certificate shall be as follows:
    CERTIFIC~TION
    I,
    (We), _________________________——
    ,
    having
    read.
    the Order
    of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
    in PCB 80-221,
    dated
    _____________________________,
    understand and accept the said
    conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By:
    Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett, Clerk
    of the Illinois Pollution Cor~tro2
    Board,
    he e~ycertify that
    the
    above Opinion and Order were adopted
    on the
    ________
    day of
    ~
    1981 by a vote of
    ~
    Christan L. Mof~~ Clerk
    Illinois Pollution~ontrolBoard
    41—4.5

    Back to top