ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED.

CLERK’S OFFICE.

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

Ilk

ll,t.I’~4Jl’~

:rti

II

FO\

(UNi’I~(~I,I;(.);\l~I

IflNFG\

\llI)WES’J’

GlTNl:RATION,

1~C.

(II Ei’~NEPINPO\VIOt SI’AnON),

P

t Lit i(III CE.

ILLINOIS

FNVIIWN\IEN’t’A1,

PI4( )‘I’E(

‘‘I ION

..sc;I:!’cCy,

)

P

(.~

13

)

(Perni

it

A ppc~)I

.\

ir)

It

CS

I~°

rid en t.

~1~j’Jj(

F

()F

F

lt,ING

lu:

Pollution

Cc•iitrol

Board, Aim:

Clerk

.Laiiics

K.

thompson Center

I

it)

\V.

Randolph

Suite

11—500

(:hicauo.

Illinois 60601

Ijivision

of

I

.egitl

(.‘ounscl

Illinois

1::nvironnient:tl

Protection ,~\~cric\

1021

North

(irand Avenue,

last

P.O. Box

10276

Springfield.

Illinois

62794—0276

lfl

EASE

LAKE NOTICE that

I

have

today

filed

with

the Office of U’

Clerk ot’the

Pollution

control

Board

ihc original

and nine copies oflhe Appeal

ol (2AAPP

Permit ol

Ihnegy

Midwest

Generation.

Inc.

(Hennepin

Power

Station)

and

the

Appearances

vi

Sheldon A.

Zabel.

Kathleen

C.

Bassi. Stephen

J

.

l3oncbrakc. Joshua

R.

More,

nod Kavita NI.

Paid, copies of which are herewith

served

upon

you.

Kat

ken

C.

asst

Dated:

November

3,

2005

SheLdon

A. Zabel

Kathleen C.

Bassi

Stephen

i.Bonebrakc

Joshua R.

More

Kavita

M.

Paid

SO-TIFF HARDTN, LLP

6600

Sears

Tower

233

South

Wackcr Drive

Chicago.

Illinois

60606

31.2-258-5500

Fax:

312-258-5600

---

ELECTRONIC FILING,

RECEIVED.

CLERK’S OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

l~r.oI~F:iALl~

lt,Lt,\()lS

l’ttl

I,(IIOi\

(‘O.\l

ItUL

PU

\Id;

I)Y.\FGY

.\JIJ)WF.ST

(;FNFJtA’I’U)N,

INC.

(1Il:NNl~:;I’INPO\\’EI(

S

A1’ION),

I’etiliontr.

)

)

( Permit Appeal

—

:\

ir)

II.I,INOIS

LNVIItONl’.II’NTAL

3

PR01F:(’l’ION .\GIH\C\.

Respondent.

A

P

P

E\

It

A N

CE

I hereby

tile

my appearance

in

this

proceeding,

on

behalfoI’Dvncgy

Mid’aest

(iendration. Inc.

(1 lennepin

Power Station).

.1

.Y’

.~.

•~‘.

—1

i~’~

H

.J

;~.,

/.t~

Sheldon A. /.ahd

Dated:

Noveni her 3. 2005

Sheldon

A.

7ahe I

Kathleen C.

Bassi

Stephen

J.

Bonebrake

Joshua

R.

More

Kavita

M. Patel

SCH1FF HARDN,

LL1~

6600 Sears

Tower

233

South Wacker Drive

Chicago, Illinois

60606

312-258-5500

Fax:

1l2-258-5600

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED! CLERK’S

OFFICE, NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

t~FI’flI~lliii.

lI,l.l~d)I~.

j’(ij

l.~

LION (()i\

IR(~I.

I~(L\tI

I)yNr(;v

\1II)\\’I~S’I’

(;r:NFItA’I’I().’..

I.N(’.

)

(IIF:Ni’SFPIN

I’tI)\VFIt

SlA’IiON).

I’etit inner’,

)

PCH

___________________

Permit

Appeal

—

Air)

II,LIN()I~ F:NVIItON\llINT.Al.

)

l’ltO’l’l”.(I

lION

~\(I’IN(.’’i,

l’tcspm.in

(leFtI.

APP EAR A NCI~

I

hereby

file my appearance

in this procceclig. on

belialf’of Dvneg’

Midwest

Generation.

Inc.

(I lerincpin

Power Stationy

;iS

~

V

Kathleen

C.

Bassi

Dated:

November

3.

2005

She Ido a A. label

Kathleen

C’.

l3assi

Stephen

J.

Bonebrake

Joshua R.

More

Kavita M.

Patel

SCHIFF

IIARDIN, LLP

6600

Sears

Tower

233

South

\Vaeker

Drive

Chicago. Illinois

60606

312-258-5500

Fax:

312-258-5600

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED,

CLERK’S

OFFICE, NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

PCB 2006-072

*~,

*

*

k~Ol~l:

‘I

III:

JLI,l.N()l\

Pt~l.Ll

‘I

JON

C

()\‘I’UOl.

ljt).\1tJ)

DVNE(;\”

~I1nW”I’:si’(;ENFR.,tTION,

trcc.

OJENNEI’JN POWFE

S’F..VI’ION),

Petitioner.

V.

)

l’(’i3

________________

I’crnit

~\ppe~ml

—

IlLiNOIS

EN\’II(ONi\IEN’T;\l,.

PROTF?’TJON

.u~J:N(’\’,

Ites

~)OIi

(I

Cut.

APPEARANCE

I

hereby lile my

appearance

in

this proceeding.

on behalf ol’ Dynegv

NI

ids~esi

Generation.

Inc.

(I lerinepimi

Power Station).

7/tj

j,,

.“

Siepitem LBonehrake

I

)ated:

November 3.

2005

Sheldon A. label

Kathleen C.

Bassi

Stephen

J.

flonebrake

Joshua it.

More

Kavita M.

Patel

SCHIFF

IIARDIN,

LLP

6600 Sears Tower

233

South Waeker Drive

Chicago, Illinois

60606

312-258-5500

Fax:

312-258-5600

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED

CLERK’S OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

l;l.II:)l.w’IIll’

III

INCH

Cl

I.L’I’I(j\

(‘ONTROI,

ROARI)

I)VNF:(;Y

UI ifl\’LST

GENERATION,

INC.

(lli:NNI:l’IN

l’O\’IIt

SI’A’lION),

l’eOf.ioucr,

)

P01

__________

(Permit

Appeal

—

Air)

ll.li.NOIS

l.:”svIItoN.\.lI:NT..\L

)

PRO’l’IIC”I’ION .\(;FNC\

Itespondeit.

A P P LA

RAN

CE

I

hereby tile

my appearance

in this proceedin~.

on

behall’of I)) neg)

\hd~~esI

Generation.

Inc.

1

lennepimi

Power Station).

.Ioshua

K.

More

Dated:

November

3,

2005

She

don

A. /abel

Kathleen

C.

l3assi

Stephen

J

.

Bonebrake

Joshua

R.

More

Kavita

NI.

l’atel

SCI

LI FL

lIARDIN.

L1.P

6600

Sears

Tower

233

South

Waeker

Drive

Chicago, Illinois

60606

312-258-5500

Fax:

312-258-5600

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED.

CLERK’S

OFFICE.

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB 2006-072

*

*

*

BEFORE ‘11W

ILLE\OIS POl,L1’lION

(.‘O\I

ROE

HO,\¼R1)

lflNEGV

\iIl)W’I’I.S’l’ GENERATION, INC.

(I1E..NNFI’IN

POWER STATION),

l’eii(toncr,

V.

)

PC’Il

)

(l~ern~it

.\ppeal

—

~\ir)

ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENT,.\L

PROTECT

ION

AG ENCV,

3

Respi)

ii

dent.

APPEARANCE

I

hereby file my

appearance

in this proceeding.

on beltal f of

1 )vnegy

Midwest

Generation.

Inc.

(1 leniiepin Power Station),

-

~

~

-

Kavi

t a

NI.

Pate I

DaLd:

November 3.

2005

Sheldon

A. /abel

Kathleen C.

Bassi

Stephen

J.

Bonebrake

Joshua

R.

More

Kavita U.

Patel

SCHIFF

iLARDIN.

ELF

6600 Sears Tower

233

South

Wacker Drive

Chicago,

Illinois

60606

3U-258-5500

Fax:

312-258-5600

---

ELECTRONIC FILING.

RECEIVED,

CLERK’S OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

I~VF()I01’’~’Ill~

lI.l.1N0I5

I’(øI,I,I

‘I

10751

U’S’I’ROI. ROARI)

l)YNEG\

M1I)WESl’

GENERATION, INC.

(1II:NNEPIN

I’()’V~’I~l~

‘‘I’A’II()N),

3

Petitioner,

)

FIB

—

_________________

)

(

I”i.rn~itAppeal

—

Air)

I 1.LINOIS ENViRON’lI:N’F,~I.

l’R( III:C’I’lO.N

AG l1\t

V.

l’~esporrden

t.

.

CLIfl1FICATE

OF SER\1(’E

I.

he

undersigned. certll\

that

I

have scr\ ed

he

attached

Appeal

of (,AAPI’

Permit of

l)ynegv

Midn cst Generation,

Ine.

(lien nepin

Power

Station)

and

Appearances of Sheldon

.\.

label,

Kathleen

C.

Rassi,

Stephen

I.

l3onebrake.

Joshua

K.

Marc.

arid Kavita U.

Patel,

by

electronic delivery upon

the

blloaing

and

by

electronicand lirsi

class

nail

upon

person:

the

IhIlow’ing person:

Pollution Control

Board.

Atiri:

Clerk

Division

ol’ legal

Counsel

James

K. ‘I’hompson

( enter

Illinois Fnvii’onnienlal

Protection

Agenc~

I Of

\V

.

Rando ph

I 02

I

North

( i rand Atentie, Last

Suite

11 —500

P. C).

Box

19276

Chicago, Illinois 60601

SpringliL’Id,

Illinois

62794—9276

F~athleenC.

Buss

Dated:

November

3,2005

Sheldon A, Label

Kathleen

(7, Bassi

Stephen

J.

Bonebrake

Joshua

R.

More

Kuvita U.

Patel

SCI’ll

F

F”

I I ARDIN, TIP

6600

Sears

‘lower

233

South

Waeker Drive

Chicago, Illinois

60606

312-258-5500

Fax:

312-258-5600

---

ELECTRONIC FILING,

RECEIVED.

CLERK’S OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

BEFORE ‘L’IlE

lI,I,INOJS

I’Ol.IA’1

ION CON’I’ROI.

ROAR!)

DVN’l:G\’

\IIU\\l:Si’

Gl7NERA’I’ION.

INC.

IIF:NNI:l’lN

P( )V\i’iAt

S’lA’lION)

Petitioner.

lk’Il

(Pernilt

Appeal

—

Air

ILLINOIS

ENVIR()N\IENI.AI.

li((

)‘l’I

(.11 ( )N

AGENt,‘V.

it ~

S

p

(

11(1

I

iii.

APPEAL OF

CA

APP

PERJ\1IT

NOW

CONIES

Petitioner.

DYNEGY

MIDWEST

(;ENLRA’FION.

INC.

TI11NNI:PIN

POWER

S’I’,—\’l’ION) ttetiriotter.’’

or ‘‘DM( i’’.

pursuant

to

Section 40.2 of the Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Act t’Act”~t~I

IS

11(5

5/40.2)

and

35

IIl.,\din.(’ode

~ 105.300

ci

.sej..

and requc~ts

a

hearing before

the

Board

to contest

the permit

issued to

Petitioner on

September

29.

21)05.

tinder’ the Clean /\ir

.\et I’erniit

l’r’oru’ani (“CA.APP” or”i’ irk

V”’t

set

forth

at

Section

39.5 of the Act

(415

II.CS

5/39.5L

Alihotiehi

this

appeal

contests

tritniv

specihe prosisions

of

the

permit.

these

specific provisions

are .~ointertwined

with the i’ernaining

provisions

that

it

would

he

inipt-actieal

to

iniplemet’rt

those r’enia in i

rig provisions.

‘l’heret’ore. DMG

appeals

the perntit

as

a whole.

In

support of its

Petition, Petitioner’ states

as

follows:

1,

BACKGROUND

(35 ttl.Adm.C

ide

§

lOS.304(a))

I.

On

November

IS,

1990. Congress amended the

Clean

Air

Act (42

U.S.C.

740l~767l

q) and

included in the

amctidnients

at Title

V

a

requirement br

a national

perat

it

program.

The ‘Lit Ic

V pt’ogrEti

it was to

be

implemented

by

states with

approved

programs.

Illinois‘‘1’ dIe V

program.

lie CAAPP. was fully

and finally

approved by

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED,

CLERK’S OFFICE.

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

i S.

Fevii’oti

ii ‘.::‘ii:

Ii,

‘:.‘,‘H,ri

“,•,

LR~

‘~‘Sl’~I~:\

‘Ne:

l”tece:’,,l”.’:

•l.

~y/.;

‘H~l’ed.Keg.

72(i4(it.

‘ite IIlrntn~I.n’~

ii’,

‘rinte’iNi

Protection

:\genes (“Ager’iey’

I

has

had

the authority

to

issue (‘A.’\Pl’

permit’

~:tiL’e

at

Ie:ot

N’l:ir’eli

7.

1005.

ohert the

state

\\:is

granted interim

:ippri’v:~l

ci

its (‘A.\I’P

ut’)

I’ee.Pee.

t?t7st.

IllineiC

1

ale V

pn’gt’:int

is

set

torth

at

Section

cit

the

Act.

35

Ll.’\

ia,C”’cie

210

Si:hpart

I’.

and

35

llt.Adtri.(,’i’de

firer

271).

2.

‘I

lie

Iletitii’j’in

l’co~er

Station

“I feonepin

ci

tIre

Stailoti

I. A.erte~II).

No.

art

Herun

ye::er’:itt:ie

staiitcrt

o’sreJ

arid

opettired H

DN1O.

‘I’he

Hettneptn

‘.‘leeti real

getteratirir

,nuts

‘‘hut

‘

,\e:ti

inLine

bets’, ccii

053

iiiitd

l~i5o, lIre Sutton

i~

rented

at

K

K.

Ph.

R,c\

\.\.

I Ici~iiepnt.lllirii’is

ôl 327.

DUG

errtplo\’s

appric~.tni:iteIv57

people’

at

the

llenrreprti lover

Station.

3.

D\1C

onei’:ites

t\\

0

coal-fired boilers

at

I lertrieprn

that have

the capability to

tire a!

al’roirs

iiiode~that

include the eoittbiii~r:tcn f coal

and/or natural

us

tlteir principal

fuels.

In addition,

lie boilers

I

ire

urinal

gas

as

artxrlrary

I’uel

(luring ‘tarttip

and

l’or flame

stahtli’i,~ttion.Certain

alrertititise luck

niav

he

utili,ed

as \\eIl.

DN’lC~also operates

one

natural

gas

fired boiler

at

I Icirtti’pitr

used

lot’ building

lieattrtg

purposes

arid

to

produce

slearn

for

auxiliary support.

I lenneprit

also

operates as,,~()ci~ite(l

coal

liaridltng,

coal

processing

arid

ash

handling ccllrtprnettr

arid

systerils.

Finally.

there

is

a

000—gallon

capacity gasoline tank

located

at

1 lennepiti.

“1.

l-Iettnepin

is

a major

soturee strbject

to Title ‘V.

i’he two

ECUs

at

Herniepin are

subject

Ic

both of Illinois’

NCx

reduction programs:

the ‘‘0.25 averaging’’

program

at 35

hll.Adm.Code

21 7.Suhparts

V

arid

the “NOx

trading program’

or ‘‘NOx

SIP

call’’ at

35

lll.Adrn,Cnde

21 7.StrI:pac’t

\\‘.

1 letitiepiri

is

strhjeet to the l’edei’al

Actd

Rain Progi’attt

at ‘uitle

l\’

of the (“lean Air Act

and

has

beet:

isstted

a Phase II

Acid

Rain Perrttrt.

-2

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED. CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

ii’rCt’,IH. NC~e:irissic,t;s

:‘r~’.

l’~~’H.e’s

lurid

2

ate ruititn,lled

L’s

1r,’

Nu\

Iitit’rtet’srrntl ovet’ttt’e

air

eniissrotts

ol

SO—

Irout

tlte

I$rrilet’s

I

and

2

are controlled H’

Itrititing

the srrll’ttr

eonteta

cci’

the

‘rich

rtsed

fur

the boiler’.

I’M

emissions

lrorn

I3oilers

I

arid

2

are

eot:tr’trilc’cI hr art

electrostatic

preetptuator

‘‘hSP”~with

a

lItre gas erctidittortrrrg

svsuerur.

Fugitive

IN)

ertttssrecrls horn

vartous

coal

arid

:t’I: handling activities

arc einnrollco

tlir’i’rrrgh

hagliotises. errelostt:’

c’s.

covers,

attd

thor

scippr’essutnts.

as

treeessat’y arid

appropriate.

Etitissiotis

ol’earhot:

rttinioxrcle

“(‘0”)

true iitt~itedthirotiehi

good

cotrihuistion

pt’uietic’e.s iii

tIre boilers,

\‘ONI

ettttssrs’u:s

turin

the ga~clinest,’iaee

tunA ac

euctitriclled

by tire

use of

a

‘srrhnier’gecl

htvidirrg

pipe.

6.

I’lm

.Ageney received

the

oriernal

C’..\,\PI~perntit application

br the

Station

in

aliotrt

Septerirber.

1995.

arid

assumed Application

Nit, 95tt00052.

Tire

CAAPP permit

apphieatioti

was

timely subtiritted

nerd

tupdated.

arid

l’etiurotier t’eqtuested

arid

was gvaruted

urn

application

sltield.

put’

ant to

Seettoti

39.5i5

hi.

Petitioner

has

pattI

fees’

us

set

l’or’th

at

Section

39.5( IX) of

tire Act since 20t)t)

irt

eottrrt’rtion

sHrli

he (TAAPP permit

for the

Station.

The

Statiot’r’s

stuoe operating

pertnits brave

continued

iii

full force

and effect

srnce strbmiital

of

the CAAPP

permit

aplilreatioi’r.

Iinrstrant

to Sections 9.1ff)

and

39.5(4Xh)

of the

Act.

7.

l’he Agency

isst.red

a draft

perrriic for pt.rblic

review

on

,itrne

1 7.

2003.

The

Agency

si.rbsequently held

‘a

hearing

on

the draft

perniit

in

Aiagrrst

2003.

DM0

filed written

eonitnents with

the

Agency regarding

the 1-lennepin draft

permitt.

8.

The

Agency

issued

a proposed

perimint

for the

Henriepin

Station

in

October

2003.

This

permit

was

not

technically

open

for

ptrhiie comment,

as

it

had been

sent

to

t.JSEPA

DM6

has

uctrached

the

appealed permit

to

his

t’eiitioit,

Ftowever. the

dral’t

and

proposed

perriiiis

and

other

dot:nrcierits referred

to

herein

should he

irtetuded in

the adriiinistrative

record that

the

Agency

will

file,

Oiher

documents

referred to

iii

thts Petition. su~’has

c’ases or

P,c’ctrd

decisions,

tire

cursity

uccressrhte.

tn

tire

interest H

economy’,

then

t’)MCi

is

nor

urttaehirr/

streh diurutnietirs to

thi,s

Petition,

-3

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED, CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

it’.

ccci

tale Si!

,i’.

t,’c1iuicci

irs

L0~

\‘.

bJ’”.,’c:rR’:’e,s,

I5,’cctiil~,’i’

fctii,

rite

:“.:.‘.‘.‘iii’s

i,ssnieu.h

a

riralt

‘es ised

prc.rpcsseih perntit

utnul

t’e1ttesreuh c’ucititlietits

cii

Petitioner

and

tither iirtet’ested

persons.

l)Nlt’i

urguirti c’cnint:erited.

1

lie

.\eetiev

issued

ur

second

draft

es

sed

pncposed lmt

in

;\tiu’utsl

2.:’t’tS

intl

u,hiossech

rite

Pc’nuticuii’r

utrish

other intteresteci

per’tuls

lIt (hays

to c’orntnent.

:\t

rite

‘urine

tuttie.

tile ;\geites

ic’eursccl

its

pu’cli:tttruutty

Respcrrstserress Sciroitiars’. ~shteIiwa~

a

dealt

o:

tts

test

‘(‘use

icc

ccctnttitc’ots.

,tticl

invited

ctctrtutienit

ott titnt

choc’itnietit

as

weil.

DN1C3

‘iii”nititnecl

c’atnlsrneci

c’i’rtiitcuui

s cii

this

seoi~’:i

ccl

rite

permit

t’c’r

I3akh’.s

iii

arid

Icr

its

oar other

grtccr’ui! trig

stuiticcnts

together,

uis nell

ut’cti’itic

1ci’el~tiitniun’vRrs1’crnsrseniess

Stunrnnuirv,

‘ftc

A’eertcv

stil’criirtieci

tite

revised

lit’ccP~csechpertirnt

hi

I:SI,h’A

or its 45-un:

res’ie\s

or:

August

15.

tilt5.

‘l’Iie

,\gcne\

did

trot

seek

I’rtn’tbrer

er’uuoc’rrl

ccrr

tire

pernitit horn

the Petitnotier or uitlier

interested persons.

arid DM6

hua,s

riot

submitted

any

ttrr’rher eoriinneiits.

hurseci

upon the

cttuhcrsmaruclurtu that

tire ,“sceires

itad ever\

irnrerrtic’it

to

tssne

Ire

lermnrt

at

tire end of

USEPA’s

nes ie\\

1certocl.

9.

I

Etc

rout!

per’rnrt

v.’urs,

indeed.

isscred

our Septcn:iher 29,

201t5:

Although some

of

Petritoiter’s comments

have been

utddi’es,sed

in

the

\‘uin’iOrns

iterations

01

the

permit,

in

still

c’onmains

terms

uunich

conditions

that are

ml

acceptable

in

Petitioner,

including

eomrdituons

that are

eorrtrarv to applicable

lurw

and

conditions

that

hirst appeared.

at

feast

itt

their final

detail.

in the

Atigus

t

20t)5

proposed permit arid ttpon

whnch

I’eti tuoner

ci id not have

lie opportunity to

eonlmermt

.

It

t

S

‘or

these reasons that

Petitioner hereby appeals

the permit.

This pernii

I

appeal

is time

y

stibinirted within

35

days

following issuance

of

the permit.

Petitioner reqtiests that

,~

LSI-’PAR~Hai

S’s

I’ertritis

scc’tcsute

at

b,~

d

swep.evy!yjccn5d’in/pcmdsShuiHetrm

-~

‘‘c:AAI’p

perrniil

Records’’

—)

‘‘t)yttegy

t’’Iidssest

Generation lint’,’’

t’tcr the

source

‘‘eared

uo

#t

Chesseti Lurne.

Alum,

tccr

tire

sc’cnrtptcre

“irurni” of the

nrdestone

oc’iim’cn

clato,s

icr tins

pernint.

-‘4-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED.

CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

thuc

Eccuirci

ie’~iev,’rite

:‘c’,’HS

:,,

:‘e:i~uirtcl

it

tr’

ti’e

.\H,ire~,,

oid

s’”,hc,’r

tIn’

:\uiei!c”.

I’”

c’i’rrcc’!

uctic.!

rei~sttethe permit.

st’ttli~iutlinrtlier pinhlie

proeeeiltits,

ris

utppn’cipriurre.

II.

L1~’F’h:c’i’h\lNi:s,s 01

pl:Ic\lrI’

Prrn”iuuuttt

no

Seetioit

ii’L(O”hc

ot

the

llhnntors

5\~lttnritistruitise‘t’cieeshutn’r’s Act

f”Ah’A”t.5

ILCS

lttlVItu-hS.

uoutl

the Itoldttig

iii Re’,’~.\t(’/’,ir’i’(‘u//s

t’.

\Inuc:m.

~i27N.E.

2d

415

(ll.Appt:n.

1981

t (“/Amm’u-htc,’m’,ier”t.

rite

t

‘:\API5

peruintn

iss.tted by

rite

Agenc’s

to

rite

Siuitatri

ctcces

niot

become

etieeti\e

until

utiter

ur

riding

by the

board

sin

tire

perot

uippeuil

and.

tnt

hue

esetit

ccl

a

reiiiurnrd, ruin!

ilte ,\geocy

ta’

issued

the

pem’init

consisternr

with

the

Hoard’s

order,

Section

l0-(s5h) provides

that

“ss’ltenm

uc

Inceosee has

rude

niniei~urrid

sc,dfrenenn

urpplteuunion

for

tire

reucsvunl of

a

license

or

a

less

license

with

reference

tn

army activity

oh

a

coniiriumrntr~nature.

the exisrinig

Iieen~’eshall

eonmlititie

iii lull

once

arK! ehiect triitil

time

hinial

agenmes’ decusiorm

on

he

utpplicaniour

has

heern

rrturdc

artless

a

utter

dune

is

bused by order

if

a

rex ie\sitmg ec’ttrt,”

5

lI,.cS

l00/Ifl-65(h~, The

l?oc’u-\’\’(,’/’Itn”r

ectcnr’t

lottiud

that

with: respect

to

an

appeuiled

ennviron:nnmetntal

pernint.

time ‘‘firm

agetmev

dee

stunt’’

is the

final

tIee’nsnou by

time

i3oarcl

iii

atm appeal, not

the

issuanree

of the permit

by’

lie

Agency,

fljru~-iVrirntc’r.

427 N.E.

2d

.415

at 422:

see

a/co/SI’.

Inc.

v.

IL

/:nmii’o;ti’iie’nnla/

Proic’c’invn

,4u,’c”iies’.

1989

WE 137356 (III.

Pollution

Coimtrutl

i3d.

1989):

LIce

ne

L/ncn’g)’,

Inc.’.

v,

I/f

PuI/uur,’oet

Crn,r,’o/

Sd.

1985

WL

21205 (III.

Pollution

Control

Bd.

1985).

‘I’herefore.

pursuant

no

the APA

as

interpreted

by

Borg-Warner,

the

etmtin’e

permit

is

not yet

effective

anmd

the

exisning permits for the facility

contimmue

in effect.

11.

The

Act

provides

at

Sections 39.5(4)(h) and 9.1(1)

that

the

stale operating

perrrm it

continues in effect

unit il

issuaniee of ihe CAAPP

perrmm it.

I. lnder

Borni— Warner,

the

CAAPP permit does riot

heeoti’re effective

tarn il the

Board

issues

U.s

on’der on this appeal

and

the

Agency has

remsstnecl

the

pernunt.

1’Imerelom’e. DM0

ctrrrcnmtl

imas

the

neeessar

permiirts

no

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED,

CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

open’ui:e

till’

Si,,!

ii,:,.

It:

t.:.’s

,:htet’t

i:y:

‘.e.

to u:vu~iihe

:oc

~:,e”H

r,

a’

1i,e

~

‘l:t

tue

‘.e’’Jic:

rime cl’feerrsettes’

ccl

thu

perutnir

nodei’

rIme

,\l’A.

I)NIf~t’eqnesrs

titan

tue

Houird exercrse

ms

thisd’t’etnctntutt’\

uninniticriny

urt

‘15

lll,:\rim,Cm’cde *

lOS,3tl4nisn

antI

stay the

emnitre pertiinr.

Such

ur

isrec’e ssunn’\

ttcJtt’cctc’~’tir,\IG

sniriutnnccunp’’eai

urntrltcc,n~rmmrhrimc’ iiitrcicsrtmot’ncctcomrtlitmottstltur:

ectnrtruntiuet

rcu

uric’ ettntitthu,ii\e

c’cb

nice

c’cctichtHrltis

iii

mine

pi’eextstiuig

perttrrus

hetore

mm

is

unhle

to

exercise

tituin

riel:n

tic

ut1’cpeuil.

l’trrnhter,

cotmnplturutee

\\t!It

Iris’

tmturiucd

cc!

tien

jmnciniitortnmg.

uin.slieerii)nm.

neet’t’ctkeelc!tte.

~.r.e tc’pccrttnug

encnmc:iticcn~

rI:unn

urt’e

in

the (‘,\,\I’P

perniitn will

he’

extn’eiltel\

c’ccsn,’.

Ii’

coniin).V

is iii

c’c’ntclitmc’nms

ihnurt

nrc

iti’apnsno1nriatc.

as DM6

alleges

Iiehccvs’,

ss’c)tthth

c’uruse

trnc’r”,u’alcle

Ituirtmm

to

1MG.

noelcititnici

lie

imniposrnircn

cci

these unnnnneeessurry

costs

arid

time

unds er~eeh’t’een

oil

TAlK’s

rtglmn

to

undlefltiuite t’e’~’iL’s\dcii

:rppeunl.

DM6

bias

no

adequate

renimedy

an

Iass~c’nhien

than

tlmis

appcunh

to

tine

i3ounrcl,

DM6

is

the!

to

smnceeed

on tile

nmierins

of

its

,r1ipe;rl.

urs

tint’

.‘\eenie\

he~intu

Icrcled etcodiriorts

tinunt

do

r’n.st

reflect

“uipphicahhe

reqcnirennennts.”

as

slelutned

hu

‘lithe

\“.

utnid

ins

exceeded

its

arnnlnccn

try

icc

ninpccse

pei’nmiim

ecmudiniorns

arid

bras

inuposech

pen

oil

ccrtluIntionrs

ilium

urt’e

urn’hntrat’y arid

eunprreiotns.

Set’

Loire

5iar Iintliisiriev

Im’.

n’.

IH”,1.

PCB

03

94

tjurnninun’y

9.

2003

:

A”ic’/sc’ir

c~

Ri’aimt/’riiI~’e,L.L.

(‘,

ii

IEPA,

PC3

03-98

(February

6,

2(k13):,Soini1.Gcicoiiu

(‘oiiiainrer.c,

hit’,

‘.

/1)51,

‘Ch

04~47

Noveninher

6, 2003):

(‘/ianipioit

l,ohui’r’c’!oriri,s.

lee.

u’,

IIJ’A,

PC’ 3

04-65

tJuntrctun,’

8.

2004): Aumeon.

/ine,

cc.

ILP/i,

PCI3

04—102

(January 22.

201Dm’.

Li/gel Peii’o/enini

,4th1/riee,c,

line..

m’.

IL’I’A,

PCB 04—113

~

5, 2004):

Crisis

1w

Jiisi,’ie,s,

lent’’.

i’.

11:’P1t

,

PC B 04.

I

I 6

( May 6,

2004).

Moreover,

the

Board

has

stayed

time entirety of all

time CAAPP permits

nhat have been

appealed.

,1ddii/onalI~’

see

Rridf./eSiOtle/il)’(’Sione

0/!

Road Tire Company

nj’,

/L,P,4

,

pc:B

02-31

(Noveniber

1. 2001);

,‘~jjdu’e.si

~

I./.(

‘

Ccm//eni.s

(,;c’ireram,,L’

,Suilc’oer

i’.

/EPA.

Pf’13 04-I (mx

(Jurnrtarv 22.

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED, CLERKS

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

l~’.’,ic’1Ice’’iti.s:cc’,s,’’I

/:c,’,ic.cc,

/,‘h~.,/

~

t.

I/iA.

h’ch~’~i.J•

dltmt-lm,

‘l’he

liounr’tl

shitcnulrl

eonmtinioe

to

tcchlcnsy

tints

precedent,

I

2,

Finiunll’.

a

large

uitninhet’

oh

u’omithmnonms

inmc’hincied

tin

timis

(‘,\1\b~P

pem’nmtn

arc

uimspe:m(ecl

here,

1n

allow sonic

cccncintitcrrs

(cf

tue (‘AAIT

pernrtit

to

tic’

ettecttee

whmle

ec1rni\

aletit

essmmdmtiicns

ir

the oiri

snuile

onierunliug

cen’n’T.’imts

rertmurtrn

efteeni’

e

cin~chc’rSeetionm

itt

u5dui

tst

the

illnuois

‘\PA

usoolci

creurne

urn:

adnmmtnitstrative

enmvimccrnrmieno

tina:

suocild

he. to ,say

the

le:csr.

sery s’tcnilnrsiuri,

Moreo’em.

mire

:\sienmc\’s

tailnrre

to

r°~

idc’’,i

s:utneuicnin

tsfbasms

choecissed

hc’ltcvs’.

remr~letsnbie entire

peeitiir

cleteutnee,

‘‘henet’or’e,

b)TsI(

requests

tItan

the

Hoard

star

the

entire

lmc’rtntit br

these

n’euts1cni~,

13.

In stint.

pcirsiruitmt

mt

Section

lO’tm5(b)

cf time .‘\I’/\

uinid

Hc’n’e’ Vt’a,’m’i’.

time

entin’ety

of

die

(T’AAPP perintt

dices

mom

heconmie elective until

the eotmmplenion of the

atitnmimmisiratns’e

pm’ocess.

wlniem

aeccrrs “lieu

tire

Hoard

inas

issues!

mis

h’nrmah

ruIning

on

the appeal

utah

the Agency

has

acted oti

urns

renniurnd,

(For

time

sake ol

simplicity.

her’eunt’ter

mIie ei’i’eet

of

thic~,AP.\

ss’ili lie

r’efemi’ed to asa”slni\’’t.

Inn

the

umiternatmve.

DM6

n’e4rmests

that

the

l3ounn’d,

consistent with

its gratits

of

stay

in: other CAAI’P permit

appeals. heearrse

cc!

the

pen’vasnx’eness

of the

conditromis

umppealed throughout

tine

permrmmt.

te

proneen

1)15465 right to appeal

and in

the

in’nterests of adniitdstn’anive efficiency.

stay

the

effectiveness

of

the

e.ntin’e

pernnit

ptmrstnant

to

its

discretionary authorhy at

35

lll.Adm,Code

§

105304(b),

Iii

addition, such

a stay will

minimize the risk of unnecessary itmgation

concerning the

question of

a stay and expedite

resolution of the underlying substantive issues.

The state

operating permits eutrently

it)

elleet

will continue in

effect

throsngbienitt

the

pendenmey of time

appeal

arid remand,

Therefore,

the

Station

will

remain

snnhjeet

msi tire

termsis’.nnd

e’onditmons of

muse

pen’inmmts.

As the CAAPP perniiil

eaninmot Inipose

ness’

s abst u’nntive

eomid it ions

tipoti

a

perr’niittee

(see

thnsettss ion below).

emimissiotis

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING

RECEIVED,

CLERKS

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

liniituitit,tns

un

t•e:,

c’’:’i•a.

a

a

c:

F’•c•iL

1’’1et’i.it~ •l’he

‘,‘tt\ii’tt

em

tnt

“~uihrich

lic huirtiied

Icy

ur

slay

t’t’

the (‘:\:\Pb’

jiem ttrti,

lii.

1551115

ON

:~l’b’l’l\l,

15

tnt,

\itimr.( ‘ode

~

1u5,3(t—mtamCc.

Ic.

unnctl

c4tc

4,

,\s

ui

p

euiti,;’,,im’s

mmiuitnen,

line (,‘A..\ E”i’l’tL’t’ntirns

t~sc,s’ihno

nIce

flermnmepin

Poster

Stuinmimni

uiind

20

cit

mimi’

c.ltru’m’

c’al

l’m”u’e

pcc’s’et

plants

tnt

‘:he

‘tuinc’

tctu

nine

smrtmne

dame

mire

very

smrmnrlurr

at

c(ctnlemml,

‘I

lie

suiuip’

iumtre.a:ec

uii’tuceuirs

in ‘cirtmiatlv

aL

‘‘f

time

;‘cu’r:iiin~,thictinli

timere are

subtle

\‘urriurt

ircins

Ii

tsI”~’ç’

e,’iichml

co

icc

reflect

the

el emttetmt’

t’!

liflt

cli ier:ess

titan

exists

at

(lie

varrotns

siurtnslnrs,

For u’\,iitti’lc,

‘t’’t

‘ill

statictnns

itunse

lime

samnie roles

niL

eutiissiccnms

ands,

Sonic

cnnntts

in

Ire state

uric

sunliteet

I’’

Ne’s

accuiye

Pei’Iccrtuuntcee

Stunticiuri’tls i”NSl’S”t,

perhaps

New Source

Revmew (‘NSR”m

icr

Preset:t,n’nt

ill

Smeumutcuion

Deteriscn’unnmmnnm

“P51)1,

icr

nctbmer

state or fedem’aI

pm’ogranmis.

ssltmle

mcnicens

ate

tot,

,\1’t1iliealiie

retlnnc’ein’ccnns

tmiay tinter

hecutuse

oh

geographic

lcceatnonm,

~\s

ur :‘esidt,

tIne

uc’ieuus

rib

these pernmirs

riled

s~utlmthe

Hound

\viII

he

repetitious with

eleniienmms of trtirqite

mue~stcb’lceiiime

the

various

sturtions’

ein’ciinmistuirices,

Ftnrnher. the

issues

on

umppcunl

sputa tI:e

runurin

nib

~ttttplc’

tYNceraplntcumi

errors

to

c,\treunely complex

qnestioims or

law.

Petitinctier’s

presenntuninont

tnt

Iris

urppeal

is

by

rsstme

per

tmtmin

m~pe.idetmtii’ying

the permit

eundintonts

giving

t

se to

time

un1c1ieuit,

and

the conliuntiouis

n’eiunned

to

ninenc

tlimn

wutild be

affected.

shonnld

time

Hoard

grunmit

Pettnnccnrer

‘5

utppeal.

Petitioric’r

appeals

mmli

eonmditiorrs

related to the

conditions

gi\’mnmrn

toe

to

nine appeal. however,

whether or not

strch related

conditions

am’e

expressly identified

below.

IS,

The Act

clues

non require

a

pec’nnittee to have pam’tieipated

in the public

process:

the

pernruimtee

rmiei’cly

uceeds to object

to

a

lernnn or eoniditiotc

iii

a

permit

in order to have

standing to appeal

the permmut

rsstnec,i

tic

mum

‘Ste

Section

4t).2(mni oi

the

Act

(the applicant

may

mmppeal

while

onimers

need to

imutve

pumrticipmmted

inn

tIne ptmblie

pn’oeess).

l’iowever.

I)MG.

as will

8-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED.

CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB

2006-072

*

‘5

*

*

*

i’e

es

hieiuc’c’s

ins

mite

uitlntmi:tmstmucmi’,e

rec”j

ci,

t’.ea

umc:ti’

c:lr

pucmniei1sun’~eL

:0

the

c’.”.t

em’~: aliimvsu’si

liv

the

~

ni

tine

deveiopnieot

ct

this

nerm’miit,

Its

stcitIc

iti.Ltance.s,

as

thsenmssed

ins

tnmrthmer

cletunni

below.

the

Agemicy did

riot

prosicie DM0

svnrim

ur

stumiilc

op1uorttnnmtry

no

coninnnnemit,

lc’unvntig DM0

s0mht

appeuml

uns

its

scaly untetituttis’e

ms

a

tnmcuiuw

mmt

‘set ilyinig

imia1ijiropriutre

ccmnti!itttcnis,

loese

issues

mire

properls

heocre

the

I3oumrd

mm: this

prs’eeedinmg.

lb.

Sectucnm

St:tS(Ptmd)tii cot

the

Act

grurmmts

tIne

Agency

litcmtts’d

unmitlmccrmts

no

“gun1iiil.”t,;a1sLllimng

is

the

nuclntstccms

tic

mIne

peinmmim

cit

pcruudie

nnicctmntortitg

rec1intreaiemnns,

ss”hei’e

tine

sntndei’ls’ing

aliplicutble

n’es1mnnncmntcnut

does riot

imieltisic’

tinenni,

Seeticint

,iO.T’mjctdm(nn)

b’aithnb’uhl\

retleets 4t)

C’FR

~ 70,hm a’t(

iii

ilL,,

tins’

smnb1ec’t

cci

htniganton

no

,‘\fi;c(ucr’e/nicm;n

‘omit’

(‘ncnujcrn;nv

r.

EPA.

205

mum

lIds

D,(’.

Unme

200th.

‘I lie

cncuni

in

Appce!tnc’/n/ciii

Potter

tscnmad

that

state

amntimccrities

ire

precluded

lm’onc

ineltudmag

provisions

in pernnits

reqttiring more brequent

niconttoring”

nhaa

is

m’eqtnim’ed

inn

rhe

tttcderl~inngui1iplicunhhe

rec1smit’enmietit

unless

time applneuthle

n’equireimtermt cootainet

tint

periodic

tesnimir’ or

mmmomntcsrtng.

sliecified

ito frequency for the

te,snnnig

or tmnoiintori

mg.

ccr requited only

a oae-tinie

test,

Ap1co/oe/nuiit

Potter

at

1028.

17.

The

Aj:ipu/ttelmku’u

Potter

eotct’t

also noted

that

‘Title V

does

lion

impose

substantive new reqir iremiierit s’’

an

mci that

test

nmmemhods

acid the ft’equenicv

at which tney

are

reqccired

‘are surely

‘

stnhstnuntti

ye

requ

im’ermmenits: they’

mimpose duties

and

ohm igations

on

those

who

are. re~uiated.’’

Appo/ue/iiui’i

Power

at

1(126-27.

(Quotation

marks and citatmons in

original omitted.)

Thus,

where the permittimig authority,

here the Agency.

becomes over-

enthusiastic in

its

gapfiiicig.

it

is

imposing

new subsnantive requirements contrary

to Title

V.

IS.

The Agency,

indeed.

has engaged

inn

gapfillling,

as

sonne of the Board’s

tmnnderlying

regtnlationis do

not provide specifically

for periodic

monitoring,

C’.!,.

35

None

that

testing

maybe

a

ispe

cut mooiroriae,

Sc’C

Sectioum

39,5(7)(dcfi) of

ntne

Act.

.9-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED, CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

1.1..

\ca.i.m

cc’,,

L5’HL1

u,~’ i,.

i

‘.~

‘cam,

time

•‘a’,’uj\

lmuus

umlc,t

c:tgu::1c’c.

i

~m’’\

er—c’

tuttimt.’5Ltstic

gmmpimlimnng

inn

scunne

nmssiunnmees.

uns

discussed

mm: detail

biclccw,

These

acmiccas

utre arbitrary

acid

eunprneloirs

arncl

mire

iii

irtilunnsl,ni

un~smrtnqcticcnmccl

i’ee’smhunlnir\

autlmnrrnnv

ilium

eruut’:tccl

hr Section 39.5

cit

rice

Act.

\I,trecisem

c’m’mi’,tu;m\

tmm

.t,’c/cn’!cmr’//imIII

/ticus/, the\.

by

nbienr

umunnsmre.

tnnlasvtcmliy

eccastmtmmlc

tine

iinm1tcusitnccin

om

umess

s,c”m.’.munt’cmnvc

resmtmnrentnentrs.

\\lmere

Pc’citnc’icem

idcnitri’mes

inmmelrinscririunte eumpiillinou

Lm’~

the

bcuusis

t’c.cr

its

i’hjecnic’in

to

a

term

m

ncr er.mmrditircts

etf the

pen’tnut.

i’etitcmctncr recrmiests

ilium

tIme

brruitsiuo snitlic

tmtis

jireeednrng

disctussisurt

cit

gunjimrlli;m~as

part

sit

mlnunt

SI;sci.Lsicco

mcI

time speeitic

uerunm

cci

eomnditiccni,

lii

un

nmmtnmmbcn

mit

mtnsuuctiecs

specnLmca1h~tslenmtmticri

and

siiscnmssed

below, the

.\gcttey

itas

bailed

tcs

1sucende

i’ec1mmnied

ctnatnmcnns

tic

tine applicable

rcqtniretnmeut.

‘‘Applncmrble

t’eqcnii’euiet:ts”

nrc

tlimcsc

smnla~numtinis

e

i

eqimtn’ciueist.s

nl’mmmn

butte

beer:

pn’oniculcutted

ncr mrppr’oved by

IuSI1PA

ptnrsntmmnnt

no

nine

(‘heucmn

:\in

,\ct

\sitmclm

directly

numjiscsc

reqlltrcntncnmns

upon

a

soctree.

inceludimie

nito~e

requirenmicncrs

sen

frmmiln

tnt

tIme

stumtctnc or regulutn ions

that

unre

part ol

the Illinois

SIP,

Section

~t5(

It,

Gerteruni

j:ncmecdcmrmd’type

req

nnrercmeats

cur

aonhscrmtatiomis

are riot

snnbstanttive’’mnpphicurble

c’eqcmnm’t’tdiemmts’

aincl

are riot

sctf’Inemenmt

basis

tor

a stibsnanitcve nerrn

or

c’onslit

tOll

10

the liertmiit

20.

‘line

Aeetme\

limo

s’nted

tuermerally

to Sectioins 39,5(71(a).

(b),

(e)

and (F) oF the

Act

or to Section 4(h) ot

the Aci,

bt,it

it

has

riot cited

to

tire ssthstanitiye applicabe

requirement

nhat

serves

as

time basis

for tine contested

condition

in the

permit.

Only

applicable requirements

may he

included in

time

pen’titit.1

amid

the Agency

is

required

by Tite

V to identify

1k basis for

inclusiorn of

a

pen’cnnt coccditiors

(Seetionn 39.5(7)0)).

If

time Agency

eannuot

cite to

tIne

utispincuthle

m’eqmniretnnermn

mind

mint’ condition

is

icon

pr’ccper

gaphihtnng.

tine

emcatlinion caution

be

tm

is

ttseins.siccmn

nit

papImttiaL~

rite

ri/)Jco/ac’/ni(cmm

I’cmccs’rcimntrt

ttcmtes

thin

“t

iite

V

it,ceu,

not

ifllpcite

sub,stunnmtive

new

rec1uirernnents,’’

205

FL3d

mit

(126,

ilniec’mnat

claninamion

niiunrks

unicd

citumtimstts

mitninmect),

-10-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED. CLERK’S

OFFiCE, NOVEMBER

3.

2005

+

*

*

*

POB

2006—072

*

*

*

*

*

imsetmmclesl

inn

misc

iternu

mit.

‘Line

:\geire’:

hums

ctimtasccl

ic

umc:usmt

ciuccum.

acid

itnLmcrucatimmn-ucniucrmuma

untilhscn’ity

wills

‘mmpjciicunhle n’equic’erm:eicis.

Ihe,s

mmmc

rmnct

lie

same.

Seenmoni 4(h) of the

Act

eunrinot

he

ccci:’ eu’tecl

itnncm

unit

uipphieumhhc

n’cslciirenccnrt

mends’

becacise

mine Agerev

includes

it

uts

nine basis

t’cnra

ecmnndinnonm,

Futilmni’e

mit

cmne

tine

utpjihieunhle

m’eqntretaercu

is

gn’ncninnds

for’

mine

Hcmunr’sh

km

rennausi

nine

term

mm

cmutmditmicit

to

the Agenmee.

21.

\‘lcmrei”ser,

tine

Agettc\”s

uiss(’rtiomn

itt

tIre

Kespcnmnsmsc’mmess

Saninsar\

thrunt

its

general

snucicntor\

aintlncmrmnr

scr\es

ums it~uicmnhscrity

icc

nnc~uhrmchecori~hnrtontstnecessar\

tic

“umccomplnshi

the

pmtr’Jc,mses

m~I rise

\cn’’

tilisitame’

s.thtumtounctntumlty

iii

nine ,\ct.

RcsIsccnisms’ettcss

Sunnjtnar~,p.

ISu

or

,S’cciisctn ,10.5(Thrit,

Seenoma 39.,5i7ituni

,suns’,s

mInim

mime permit

is

to

coictaini

csmniditictns

mmcc’s’ ssuim’v to

urskmnre

c’c’:imipliunrmce

witim

all

uilihshmcuihche

nenhmnin’entnennt.s.’’

(Iummrphi;nsns

added,)

For

the Agency nc

tssnnnmtc

broader

asnthornty’

barn

ticam

grmmnttesi

by the Act

ns

siinla’af’ctl

artd arbitrar

and

eapricnotts.

22.

Another

genterumi

deficieticy of

mire

CAAPI’

perrnmntiug

process in

lhimrtois

is

mire

Agemncy’s refusal

to

deselimp arid

some

mm

loc’nnal

.stniemtreai

cci

basis l’or the perc’nin’s

cnmnidmniccnn,c.

This stamcnncnn

of

basis

is

to

explumin:

tins’

mx’m’tm’citttog

acnthorinys

rattonnahe for the

terms

acmsl

cscndcniocns of the perninit,

In

is

to explain

‘viny the

Agency

cuacie

tine decision

it

slid,

amid

it is

to

provide the

pernnin tee

ice opporl utcit V

to challenge

tine

Agency’s rationale during

nbc

perrnn

developmiient

process or

comment

pcriecd.

‘l’inie V

reqemires

tine

perrnmntting authority

to prox’icle

such

a statement of hasis.

(Section 39.5(7)(n) of the Act.)

The Agency’s

after-the-fact

conglomeration of the very

shod

project

sui’nnnary produced

at public notice,

time permit,

and

the Responsiveness

Summary are

jtnst

not sufficient.

When the pernnittee and the public

are

questioning

n’annonale

ri

eomnnent.s.

it

ns s’vident

that

rime Ageocys

view of a

,snateme,tn of’

hunsis

is not

sufficienit,

Fimether.

time

Resporms ns’emmess

Stnrrmmmiry

ms prepared

after

the fact; it

is not

.11-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED. CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

PCB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

;ucrmmHc

cmc’ve

.L!c~

.m~.’am.

LLrm’cumrc’

H

e;mtnrmcmm

~c.t’5c’

cmi

,lmm’

stumtc

muck

mum

cit

,suucc’u

‘LIce

buick

itt

cm

vrunislc

ktaicmrtcirt

ccf

bursts.

sicti\muig the

pei’rmnmitee

normce

of the :\veircys

dccrsnorm-

nmnu~knog rurtiimnmunlc

unntcl

nine

ccp1ccmrnmutmim\

tic

t’m’nntimrcuin

tincr’ecms.

miunkes

mime

enmnmre

pem’nrnit

defective

cud

ii,

rim

unnoh

cml

itsc’hb,

cm

hunsis

tmcr

cipJseuml

u:tcii

rcrtmumrmsi ot

time

permit

mind

sOny

cit

tIne

entire

permit.

\.

lsm’ittdilt(’t’ and

l’ift’(’tivt’

l)utl&’s

i

(

c,vcr

13.

The

:\c’cnmc

a

i.”mmeci

titan

HA,.\ichc

1ncrnmmit

than

is

tine

srthtecm

mnf

minis

appeal

to

Aim;

cmn

Scpmennnh:r

‘o.n

lnittl,

cmi

uchiccit

‘

I

~um

lime

Ageucs

nt~uiit’meslDNIG

linuin

die

permit

luuccii’mccuiskns’dimlnndctmgimemmnumiHsctti

mh’)~sin’, ‘Lime

emumail

icidicamed

timurt

the

1rernnirs

were

utsucilunhie

mitt

i,tSh’.t’

\s

sschm,t5’,

\surcrc

hllmrmt’ts’

pcritnrns

arc

imnmused,

llc,wevci.

than

was

mciii

tine

cutse,

1)51(3

svcmc

mcci

unhlc

tnc

bntcurmc

time

permits

‘mm

rite ssehsmte that

evening,

24.

lime

isctnucmts’e

lucre

if the

pcrnrnim

hecoimnes

minmpnmtlutut

hecmtmnse that

is

also

the

siunne

ninuct

stunris

tine clock

t’,nr

fnhitmg

mum

umppeutl

utitsi

tine siunte.

unless

the

perimmin

is

unppeunled. by

ts

hnccIn

ccm’numnnr

dcucmmnnmcnmrs

ninrmsm

hk

scnhrnitnmesh

tsn

mIme ;\gctncv.

USFP,A’.s

wehisinc

isicntii’ies

than

dare

mis

Septentther 20,

20)5,

if

mmmii

dunte

is

unisu

nIne

ct’teetive thnne,

nmany’

unsisintional

deadlines

ccocnhcl

he trineered.

imsclmnditse

rime

cx1sir’unmionm

siane

as

well

uts

mIte

date

by uhicis

certain

dcuccnnnnemmts

nrmtnsm

ice

‘uuhosntmeci

nrc

time

Agcrmcy,

More critical, however,

is

the

fad

that once

time

permit

heeonnmes

el’l’cetrve. i,)Ni(J

t~’otnlsibecormie

s.hligutted

ro conmply with

mm

m.sub~ectto the stay

of

tine

perumnt

as slisestssed her’eir).

rcguirdless of wimetlmcr

it

mad

necessary c’cemnesikecping

systems

inn place. the

necessary

ucsisl it ional

cscntn’oi

equ

pnmcnm

inn

place. ansi

so

iom’th.

It

took the

Agency

oven two

years to

isstne

tine

final

permit

,

Over that

course

of

t

imne, the

Agemmey

issined

mtinnneronms

versions

(ci

the

penrmiin.

anmd

it

Icas changed conmsidcrahly,

Therefore,

it

wottid

be

tnnn’eunsonabic to expect

l).MG

to

icutssu

mnmtmncipamesi

nine

(‘vial

pernnrit

to

tine degree

riccessutry for

it

no

inure

been

ni

comnnplianice

by

September

29,

2005.

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED,

CLERKS

OFFICE.

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

PCB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

25.

\Jm’remuvcr.

:u.miiiic.mm jc’ic

muf

mice

;.

c::c.mmuim

‘iO

um

•cseH.~

m~’

i:’

im c’n

cclfmsicnl

utOLitik’iutiUiu

ma

Illinois,

‘lime

i’ciittccmner

cunnmmnot

he

deerined

Is:

“imumse

mine permit

ti~inmlmime

origimnal. signed

version

cii

mime

peritimn

has

been

sielcverech,

Neither

Ihirinois’

i’cmies

incur

nine Act

have

been

aniiertcled

to

retlecm

cls’cmncm~niic

delis

err

cii

pernmccms.

espeemahly h~relenence to

a tinird

party’s

ss’chsire,

‘ilieret,c,’e.

cnmnnil

nine

pet’tm:iI

u’

mmm’imeialiv

nielts’en’ech

mccci

J\’m”~:mmttee.ct

shncnnisl

not

he

dcc’ mined

cii ec’t

n \~e.

20.

Prior

imc

tIne

umciser,t

cci

persasis’e

use

ot

cininmptnmers

ucnmsm

rebiucuice on

mite

inmicrinet

i5ir

conmumncmmniccctmonm.

tine

,~\gcmme\scnnn

pcrnttmt~s

Is’

socmrce.s

nhcm’ourin

mime

1.5.

Postal Scrvcce.

srst

cmi

mliii C’’\Al’l’

penmcnit

\s

as

delis ered

cci: October

3.

20(15.

Neither

tine

Acn

ncr tine

n’egtciuttions

specify when permits

si~nmcnmisi become eliecti\ c.

Prior

to tire

urdx’emnt

cmi

‘lithe

\c’,

however,

sdcknrccs

were

mnot subject

to

smncin

mtcntnneiocts

mnrtsi detailed

periucit

cscmndrmisccns.

mmor were they

expscsed

tcc

cnfon’cettns’mit

incus

sc

umummir

sisies.

~3tidcr‘l’ithe

V. riot

omii\

nbc

Agency through the

Atloc’imev

(ienmcn’aI.

hon

unlssm

I ISEF’A

amid

time

genmermni

pimiclnc

cunnn

bring etmfor’ecmtnemmt

ssnits

fscr

vioimtmioci of the

Icasm

matter

inn

nine permit.

it

time

msstmunnee

dmtte

us

tine effective

slate. dere is

potential

foe nrenmnemndous

adverse c’sntses1ueimees

to

time

pem’nnmittee

witin extremely

ttmequitahle

ei’fect,

27.

If the eileen i

ye

date was

Septecnnber 29.

2005. that

wsctnld

also create

an

cbligmmn ion

to pcrfon’n quarterly’

mm toni!oring

arid to suhrtnit qrnarterly reports, (ef

Condition

7. 1.1 0—2(a)). for the

mimird

quaner of 2005.

The third

quarter

n’epoctinng

n’equirennencts would

coven’ less than

30 hours

of ope.rat ion.A

requirement

to perform

quarterly monnmtoring.

reeordkeeping, and reporting for

a quarter that consists of

less than

3(1 hours of operation,

assutniug tine

pcrnniittee woulsi

evemn have

escmniplnauec

sysiermns ii

place

SC)

qmnickly after

isstmannce

.h3

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED,

CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

~“

FOB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

ricrmc,im,

i’,

c:ycmL.

Hcmdc,ms,cmre

uamsi

s’,Cmmcdi

mac

i’u’mmd’tit

m:cc’c’mm\ct’immmc:cmrt

i tm,m:u\

u:~ucmmums’m.

Iherefore,

time

m’eslnuremmmem’mn

ms

umrhirrary

unudi

capt

ietccmts,

25,

:5

iumsstmmi,

cud

note

csimirruchhe

cnpprc’cceh.

wccuid

ne

Im:r

mine Agency

tic

sicl’av

nine

cmtecnive

slumme

u’t

un

imrrcmi

aerate

cciner

i’ctimmmmmsl

unnmsl

tcmssmt,nnmce

imir

cm

pemiosi

of

mmmc

rs’mrsccomcblv

scnii:cicnmt

tic

udloss

‘dcumuccs

icc

iicmmuictmcetil

umuly

i’ne’,\

cm’mu:plnccimcc

svsncmmis

nmece’sar\

inec’amnse

oi

mine

ncrnmms

cii’

mime

pcrumiin,

Am

tics’

\~er’.leon.

time :\eeoe\

silcmciici

deLia

time

pernmmit elective

slate

nmcmil

tine

name

allowed

la\

lums’:

Ocr

tine

.sotitce

mic

ucrcpCa~nbmc

perrntmt

mmi.k

espmi’ec.I.

(‘ccr’;sisns’tct

s’,ctlc

tine

:\PA,

mice

eimecmnve

clans’

sit

misc

neiman!,

cccnctesmesI

Imercinc,

is

sna\ed,

mind

)~(‘,

ret1mmc’is

titan,

mice

I3ocmrsm

cinder

mime

:\g.cn:e\

icc

cstalniisin

an:

citectise

slate

‘(urine

pencil

of rime

uniter

mice

1is’rmrmnmec

mcmi

receuseil

nine

pcu’ru:it

moliors

rig

t’ermiamnsi

crud

n’en.ssttmnunce of

tine

perunim.

to

unliow

the

pm’rnmttnnee

sntltmemenst

tmrmnc

to

tntcpleumnetit

time

sysnemmns

necessary

Is

connipla

witin

all

me’slumrcnileuits

inn

tints

very

escuncplex

mcct’nut

14.

(iveraii

Soti ne

(‘oimd

lions’

Section

5

t

‘l’he

1k’ mu

ii

I

imi p mc peru

i

ncorporatt’s

(

onsenil

i)ecnet’ Requircnmwnts

30’

Ott

Mar

27. 2005.

rite

United

Stmntes

District

Coon

I’s.’r

tine

Soumhenn

District of

Iliiimccps

etmnered

a

Conrscnnn

Decree in

mine

nnammer of the

Unnnnesl

States of .‘\nneniea, ct

am.

v.

i)s

mmeoy

NI rdvc

t

st( a inst

cm noun

en

1

(

tsr

No

99

5

s

SliP

(mitt

C

scuse

1

Dr cc

us,

)

flit

CAAPP

Pernmnit

refer’s to

the Consemnt

Decree

mn.s

Attaelnnnemmt

7.

1 mdcc Paragrapim

158 of

mine

C:omisennm

Deen’ee,

DM0

is

reqtniresl

witininm

I

SO

slays

ufier entry of time

(‘ccnnsecnm Decree (by

November’ 23,

20051

to

aummenci

any

applicable

‘i’imle

V

Perni it App

icat ion, or

ms) apply’ for

armncnsi rents of its

Tim Ic

V ~nernimI

5,

to

mmcl cnsie a

seimesimile for

mcii

‘‘Unit—specific

performnanmee,

operationma.

rmmaimrts’irmcmnce,

umnisi

connnt’scI

mecinitolscgv

c’c’slcritcnmetims

esmmmishmsliesi by

Imimel

(Lcnsent

Decree

mm

(‘omnititicin

5.4(a).

time Agency purports

to

ineorporctte

sudm

a

sehcdtmle

ion’

tine

14-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED.

CLERK’S OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

ilcmmnmc~ini.~munnimumc

tmnrccmnJ

“,‘smtcmclmrc

memmu

0

Jun

flucrrtrim~’

:55

tmmmid’o

tU:

(,c:cmdtiiamm

5.-hal,

.smncim

cmnn

“Attcmclnrmneiit

(n’

is

refdurresl

no

mum

tine

pernnmi

ucs

time

“Sehesluie.”

Couslimicmn

5,4ma)

scf the

pcnmm:ii

nd’s1tmim’es

miccmt D~~C

coumpmv

es ill:

tine

“rcqmuin’ennlennnn”

ccl

tine

Seits’dnile.

i’mtrlrer,

ittider

SecOomi

IS?

1if

mite

(‘ounscrim

Dcci’ce.

“umuca

menu::

sir

hnnmnmt

esnuninlislmesl

liv

ncr

strider this Consent

Ftccrec~ln’,cil

inc

cnnt’scmscmmhle

uninder

minus

(‘dmmn’,cmnr

Decree

reeumrdless

ict

\slcenhen

smnclm

tcrnun

has or

o

iii

hem’cinmne

cc

lnmmn’t

oi’

cc

‘l’itlo

V

pernmrt

11,

:\itlui’mmoiu

cminmmpmiccuee

ivinlu

the

rcslsmineinemnms

sen

bob

mu

tine

Scltesitmle

is

ai:eumslvr’cs1mimrcsi l’\

(‘cimnslnnionn

5,~4mumm

cmicmn

mice

(.‘snmnscmnt

Decree

cmlso

remumuicnms

etnmccreeahie

by

mis

men’mcrs,

urnunnmr

suiher

secmiscmms

mmf

tire

pcrnimmm

cmlso

psnrpscui

tom

resltnin’e

cuummmpimarmce

o

rim

\‘cmrnscus

redloircmunen:ts

set

torth

cnn

mine

Scincsltmis’,

See. cc.,

(,‘ouditicins

5.4(H

.5.7.3,

5.7,4. 7.l.3cuit(ii).

7.l.3(h)mh). 7.l,3(c)cii’t,

7.,40c’ctin’.

7,1.4(e), 7,l,~n, 7..6-2(b~.7.I.7(afli), 7,l.7(a)(iii),

7,i7(mm)cs),

7,I.7(in)(ihcmfl),

7.1.5(e)

ansi 7.l.9-2(h)(ivl.

‘l’he

rel’em’eunces to.

ansI

the

chmmrcceenizainoncs

aimsi

pmmrmnorucol

innccmrporunmion

cf

Scinedmule

onn

Cocnnscnm

Decree

reclnciremnnents

jim

mmniciumplc

eonic,iitiomms

m’esdtlrs

no

sntpbiectttse

ansi

potecmwcliy’

cncoctsismenur

obliemctions. unauthorized

rcsmuiren:enns,

cormfsnsion

mcrmoi

mnmithigrciny,

For

innsmcmnnee,

as

rioted

in

,nmccn’e sienail elsewhere in

tinis

Petition, Condition 7.1.1 2(h)(ni) of

minis

pernimit

pmmrports

tom

innpleinnt’nnt

parniciciame

melter CF,MS

provisionns

of

mine

C ‘otnsenm Decree hut,

in reality’, would if susnaimned.

create an entirely new and

unnftttinonnZesi

obligation.

Tin is

del’eem in Condition 7.

1

.

1 2( h)(i i

).

and

si

ni lmnr

slel’eems

in some

other conditions

mham

address or refer to

tine Consent Decree.

are

separately adsiressed later in

mimis

petiniomn.

Those

specific

cinalemmges

iilnnsnrate the many probienis caused

by including

specific

conditions that refer to or otherwise

amlemmmpt

to incorporate obligations or provisions

mona

the

Sclnedmnie

scm’

Cotisenm

Deen’ee,

mcnnd

higiningint

iii

vnn’tic’iulmnr.

winy

those

contditiomms

simsmtnld

he deleted from

tine permit

.

Making speeiiie challenges to soirte

c’omnslimmcums

is.

Inenwever, not

.15-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING

RECEIVED, CLERK’S

OFFICE.

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

mm.scm.u.mm:.c

ci

Iomnc

::mcmcmccni.clccms,aimmlai’

H

ccunstrtued

as

cm

wumi\’s’r

mul

mine

t’cmcimmt

inn

nlmis

section:

of

mine

pemmtnrcmm

tic

delete all

eouunstmmtonns

nlnccm

refer

sn the

Schedule cr0

m’umscmim

I )cemcc.

v

itlm

ume

excepmmcmn’:

cml

(

dmmcdmtncnui

5.4may

32,

Gn:eum

‘inc

l,mm,u’,., ccc

mcm

mine

(‘m’tmscmct

Decree

u:r:sl

mccum

mmmc

i’m

its

res1icmneun:cnnrs,

DM0

does

mncmm

cmh;e~n

is’

(‘c.cmcscemmicm

5,4mc.m,

Iicdmcmsimmu

cctacldmntc:ucumi

coccsltmmccn:s

inn

mine

pernnnt.

lnccoeser,

cmncimmslnmtc

0

murslntmmmnn

5

4mlcm,

mttuclsnsi.iuc

cmli

mci

mrs

~snlmnccmmsu.

5.7.3

cimtcidnmimmno

all

stmlmpunr’is),5.7.4.7.i,3m.mccc;,

-

lHchcmitm,

7.i,3~cicmnt,7

l..imlmimnin,

7,I.cmcm.7.lan.l

cinueimmsiiumg

au

mfits

submncin’ms),

7,i.O.Hicm

cccclmmmiitme

cmii

c:.clmlmcin

smmhrmcmm’msm.

7,l.7(um,ctim,

7.l,7(umcmiiim,

7.I.7munm(vm.

7.1 ,7lhn(ntncml3).

7,l,cSmcmccmisi

-

i.~c.2mhmmcsm

mlmcmm

~cLirlnoo

ru

tnmmpicnnnemmn

icr

undiOjit

ncquircnneumms

t’mnmm or onherss’ise

chum

cceuenmvc

cur

remen

mdc

nbc

S

‘cmumscnm

Decree or

Scheilinle,

ansi

csmnislitiscnms

mimcnm

r’cfem’emnce

cnn

relumne

mc:

such

ccmnmmimnicmmcs

is

umrhtnn’umm’r

arid

ccnpnncnc.nas

ccmnd

mimnmcsmtinoniteo hi’

lutsi

time

‘‘:\dslitnocnmal

(immmscmnn

Decree

mcnmdiinmduins”).

33.

ion

iinese

tccnmctm’,

:\mldlitmsumiccl

Consent

Decree

(‘cmnmslmmisnnns.

mcli

ecninmesned

heu’enmm.

arc stayed

mu thns

pn’occesimnng

c,cmm~mstcnnn s’

nmin

tine

AP1\ .ncusi

DM0

rcs1nmcsns

than

mhe

Romci’si crsier

tine

Agenncy to delete these

cm’.mudnmicumns

atnd

cr11

ms’i’en’emmces

to

these

consimmnons

I’rcmnn the

permit.

‘fhns

slay will

have rio effect

0mm

nine

enmfoi’ccahmhty

sd

mine

Comnscnm

Decree

under its

mmwo

ternms.

~ii)

The Permit I ris’orrectiv

Reqinires

Conmnpliance with

Consent

I)eeree Requirements

Iii al

Do

Not

Ace rmi

e

win

hin

I he ‘Fe mm

(If

tine

Pci’m it.

34.

‘line

ps’nummit

nm

s’ctnuous conditions

purports to

speemiic’aIly’

inmnpose

obligations

with

n’especm to

man ten’s

that

are

lot

t’ec1ttnred

tnmnder

tine

Comisemnm

Decree

prior

to the

stated

expiration

date of

mhe

permit.

Sepmennher 29.

2OiO.Arnennpnine

mo

impose

in this

penhnit

m’eqtmiremnnenns

that

slcm

nom

accnmie

trail

uniter

rime

tennnirmutiemn

slutme. of

linus

permit is arbitrary

arnd

capniciotns

amncl

mmmncconhsni’izeml

ha

law.

Ion excnnnple,

(‘onmslmnioas

7.1.6-1(a).

(in)

amid (e)(ii)(B)

16-

---

ELECTRONIC FILING,

RECEIVED, CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

ucddncss

etnm?u.iscnc

Jummitcinicutis

cmicl~ciiecml~ic

,untc’~’mimc

s’vmlr:c

miccrm

dame

smcmtcsm

Iiv’eccccr

‘.erc::

mime

(‘:\APP

1ns:rmmitn.

35.

I”snr

ninese

u’ecmsscus,

escnnslimt~uurctimuct

uccidn’es~sm’eslnuircumnemnns

rnmncier

mine

S.

cum~L”

mm

Decree

nhumn

mmrke

muter

Semntemniner

7s,m,

2(1cm.

mmmcitcm,tmmc

(.‘nmmdimtonn

7,.6-lcmmc.

(Iii

cmmnd

ccmc

mu

miD.

cmnsi

mcii

cmcnndunms:nms

micat

refeu’emice

sir

r’eiccne

am

nicese

cmcumslrmucumcs.

umil

cmcmntested

lnereimn,

cure

sncnvcci

cscnnsmsnemrt

soth tine

:\P:\

.c:mmsl DM0

res1mmcsns

mimcmm

mi,e

himmnncl

cunmier

tIns’

.~\cenmesrc:

delete

nbnesc

es’usiimno:ns

ccuci

cmli

relereincu’s

to

tfnese

csctcdi:nmcrms

remit

mine

perunnin.

‘I

inns

stuns

o’iii

imutie

tic’

eIleen

omm

mime

enmtol’ceaiumlin\

snI

time

(‘ucnnseunn

Deemi’cc

nncmlem

in

ccwnm

memimts.

iii)

‘line Scimednile Misconstrues

Sonic

(ccinsenmt

Decree

Itequimenmeints

arid

Inneomrt’ctI~’

Requires

Compliance svilh

Cericrimn

(.‘oimsenit

l)eerec

Rcqu’enmeuts final

Are

Not Unit

Specific.

35~,

;\ccon’dinmg

tom

Csnnslitioin

5.-lmccl,

tine

Scineslunle

sets

irmrtin “I.inmm-Spceii’ic

Perf’ortiuance,

O1nercmtionmcnl.

N’iccimnteincnmncs’.

anmoi

(‘mcncmurci

1

ceimnimmiccgv

Re1snin’ennteumm5

sit’

nine

(oumsemnm

i)eeree that Apply’

mdc

mine

i3mcidwnmn

Sncrniomn

..‘‘

cmiii.

cmccou’nlimme

mo

mime

Agemney.

the Seheslunle

is

‘‘included

inn this

permnnil

inmnrswcmit

mo

Icmcrcm~.rncinit

I

ScS

of

mine

Cumnnsennn Decree

‘‘Tine

Selnedmmie.

imoweve r,

nrnelnnsles

reqimi

rennnemnts that

an’e

non

mmnn

in—s

penile

aumd

miniscinaracmerizes

certain

Cornscmnt

Decree

m’csui

remnnents,

37’

Contrary to

Comnditiorn

5.4(a)

ccn:sI

nine Consent

Decree,

Paragraphs

57.

58. 59,

60, 6,

62,

73. 74,

83,

87,

89, 91,92.94

95.

96. 98. 99.

119.

125,

157.

aind

183

of tite Schedule

innpose obligations on

the

Smatiomn that are

not

umiin-s1nccific,

Tin

addim loin.

Pai’agra1nhs 9

.

92. 94,

95 and 96

of the

Schedue

atmempm

1.0

impose m’equirememnts

that

are not currently applicable

to

a

Henncpin

unim

and

tinan might

not apply

in

mine

futum’e.

Paragraph

157

also

rniseonstrnnes

the

Counsennm

Decree

by purporting

to

nnake

mine

Selnesitnie

emnfom’eeane

tnnder the

Consern~Decree.

Furtlnen’niore.

Paragraphs 42

arid

44

do

mom

mcec’tnrmcu ely

recite tine

lam igmnfnge

of

tine Coinse nit

-17-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED. CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

I

me~mee.

u.:crtmce

,mmtThELmCH’.

c,r’.i

~

:‘hWcts’cat

or

immcHtmsm.’.memm;

.,el:iecm t:ccm :s.:\cs’u;’slmumgiv.

nhmese

imcmrcmen.cmlllns ol

time

Sd

medimnis’

.nre

cmrtnnti’cnnv

annsl

ca1nricmncmn~curd

mmnncinmtinonmied by

law.

3~.

ion

these

rcmiscmmnn.

l’cmrcnenapbis~/.58.

59.

0(1,

(ml.

Sc?,

7.3.

74.

83. 87.

89. 91.

92.

o~ scm’:

05,

Oem,

1 I~. 25.

i57,

cmnnch

83

sum’ tine

Scinedmnic.

aim

ccmmncsmcch

hmcnemna

are

sncnyesh

u’rnsmstetnm

~i

imin

nine AiA.

cmmmci

1)510

reqmnesms

mincnn

mine

i3ocmrsh

order nine

:\eenncv

no

delete

i’cm:cmen’cnilmns

57.58. 5~,

(:1), (ci,

(iS.

73,

~.m,

c)i

cJ’

tLm,

95

O(i

sm$,

519,

125.

157.

and

183

frcnnn

mine

Setnesisnic

cunmsl

all

rclcmetncs’~

tic

timcc

i’cmn’cm~rapIn’cIn’ccnmn

nine

penmen,

no

ne\ise

i’cmrcngrcmpins

53.

87.

f~.arid

I

1° 1mm

muienmnims

mine

hnceimtc

immnutts)

cit

tine

I Ienmmnepnmn

Snammscnm

mmcm

mime

requiremnnemnn

applies

mc:

cmnncl

tcu

emmtlccc

time

em’rmcns

cccmmnc:inned

nm

I’cincmercnphns

42

cnind

4-1

nv

simninincammnnu

the

lmmnngtnage

in

mine

pcmrcmilel

pn’suvistdcmt’

cnl

uhic

(‘smmnsenn

Decree.

(i\

.1

Recordkeepmg

(IF

and

Reporting

HAP Fmmmissions

line

5

.\.\)J)

incrunnin

nssnmesi

icc

nine

Stcmtns’n requires DM(

i

Inc

keep reeorsls of

eunnissionus

sit

nnieresmrs

,

invsircnrenm

clniorisie,

cmmmsi

Insdi’ogemn

lisnsnrnde

--

cmli

I 11\Ps

‘-amid

no

repsmrt

tinscse

cnnnissionns

cnn

Csmnnslmmicmnms

5.5:.

1

(cm)

cnnnd

mIni (n’eeordkecpinng)

cnnnd

5.7.2 (reportinng).

Time

Agemncs•

ito’

nnot

ci

jnn’nnvided

ci

Inn’olner

smcnttttOry’

snr

rn’gtmicttmury’

basis

ior

nlmesc

reqmniremnennts

sntlner

lion

tine

nuemnen’cni

inrovisnoins ci

Ses’min,cmns ruin)

amnd

3c;5(7)(3)

(In).

cdmmd

(e) ol

tine Ad.

Cimatiotis

nmmem’ely

no

nine

genneral

pn’cnvisiomns of

nine

.Aen

sb

not create

ann “applicable

reqnnim’eminent.”

40.

inn

fact,

mitem’c

is

no applicable

reqsniremmnennt nhat

allows

tine Agenncy to

reqtmire

this recordkeejninig and

reportmmng.

‘here

are

ins) regal ations

Ilnam

I

irmnin

emmssmomns of HAPs fronn

tine

llemnnnepin

Power

Snanionn.

While USEPA has

recently

prommnugated

tine

Cleamn Air Mercury

Rule (“CAMR”)

(70 Fed.Reg.

28605 (May

IS, 2005)),

illinois

has

not

yet

developed

its

eon’n’esponnslnnng

regtnlammcnnns.

I

Inc Arenney

eorn’ecniy

discussed

minis

issmne

relative

specifically

mo

mnnereury’

mm

the

Res1nomns’ennes,s

Stmnnmnnary

by

psninnmimng (nut

mlnam

it

cmninncun

mnslsl

smihsmannmive

.18.

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED,

CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB

2006-077

*

*

*

*

*

reslmmtremnncnnns

:iims’oeim

cm

r.\.\Ilm

psn’nnnit

cmr

mimm’.im

cli

its

muinimc1

mc

tcms’netnee

mmc

nine (‘.\\k

.5cc

Respcnsuvenness:

Sttmnmmnmcurv

inn

tine

Adnnnmmnismrcinmve

Recond,

p. 21.

I

iccwe’cen.

nine

Agency

wcns

mrmccmm’res’n

iii

u.s

shmscmmssic’nm

nmm

nine

Rc:~nmuin~ivemiess

Snunnmrnnar\

by

statnnnc

thom

mm

ccmmn

ncR

mlpmcun

Secmhmmu

4(hn

as

cm

inmyms

cur

n’,’qmtndinnc

n’ecm~rmtks’eminmnccmmnsi

n’~nmum’nirmgcci

nnmereur\

emnmrssioins

mmnn’osngin

the (‘AAPP

penmnnmm.

‘lime

:\cemncv

hncms

ccuntmnsesl

its

dmnn~ run gather

dcmtcm

mnmmrsnmcnum

mci

Secnnncmm

4timm

amid

its

cnlntimonim\

no

ecnphmlt

t

mu

cm~~

mire

eomnn1nimcnmnce

winim

tine

1ncn’mmiim

\\ntin

tine

imnnnnncmmmonn

cnn

nms

cnmnnlncnnmrv

unnncicr

finlc

\‘

to

mtnclmcdc

omniv”cmppiiccmhie

res1umrcmmnemnns

inn

cm

i

tie

V

pernnnin.

See

Apjcum’tim’Jiiciim

J’iccmn

1.

Kern

h\

immcimisimmne

ccfli\

recouikseinun:

mind

m’epclnnmmng

mi

ilAlm

emmnissictnn~ in:

tine

Inermmmin.

nine

•\eemiev

imcns

esccesled

its

cmmmthmmnrmtv

ust

cms

serncncsiv

mis

ii

mm

imcmd

nmncismdesl

ennnissiomns

lirnimcnnnonms

i’mur

I iAl’s

inn

One

perunmnt.

Secticcin

4tinn

sisnes

non

1nn’cms’nde

time

cmmininority’

tsu

innpsnse

ninis

csnrnsintiomns

inn

cm (T~\,\f~P

Inc’m’nmmnl.

4.

Fnnher.

nine

:\gennc’v’s

ncwml

regunicmmiomms.

~0nmcim

cnre pa~oi

tine

cnpptox’ed

~nI’ogmannn

on

SIP

tot’

its

‘i’imle

V

nm’snmnnarnn.

nnecinde nbc

A’nmcy

tnnnnn

‘equnn’nnp

mine

rccsmrdkee~nmnng

amnd

r’epsnrminng of

HAP s’mnnissisnmns

nlncnm

in

inas

imneitusied

at

Cormsiimionns

5.6. It a)

mmmlii

(in)

amid

5.7.2,

Time Agerney’s

Annnnucni

hlnnissionns

Reporninne rules,

35

lli.n\cimnn.Code

Pan

254,

whnein Connditionn

5.7.2 specifically addresses.

smate

as follows:

Applicable Poll

nmtcnmnt s

ion A nnnnmna I

Enn iss iomns

Reporm rig

Each

Annual

Emissions

Report

shall

imnelude

applicable

imnfornnnationn

for

all

reguianed

air

polIutamnts.

as

defnmned

inn

Secmiomn

39,5

of

tIne

Act

145

ILCS

5/39,51,

excejrt

for

the

folio

inct

j~jmflutamnts:

*

*

*

h)

A

hazardous

air

pollutanm

eninitted

by

an

eminission

umnit

that

is

not

snilnjecn

tsn

a

Nctmiomnal

Etnnissions

Smanslarcl

for

Hcnzardoris

Air

Polutannms

(NTIS

lAP)

or

max irnmnnn

ae)nie~’ableeonntroI

neeinmnniogy’

(N4A( 71’).

For

ptrrposes

of

this

snbseetion

(h).

ennnissiomn

ummits

ninum

are

non

reqttircd

to

eonnmnnl

snr

Innimit

emnissnsnns

bum

are

m’esiuiresl

to

nnnonnimsnr.

keep

I 9-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED. CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

FOB 2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

.•‘dte~

.~‘c~dme cmeti\itiesc:md

5’c,n.sismm.:tcci

n~m1yeet

am

mmcii

t’mI:dmmiaemmnt

ccc’

rcqmmiremmtemnn,

35

liI..\dnmm.(’cmcie

7

2~4.

iOmi:u.

ul3rcnekets

icn

o:ugmumcmic

eunmisincists

cmciciesi.n

Pccs\er

picnmmts

cnm’e

uncut

scilniecn

mmc

clime

NE’.SI i,\I~

cut

\1.\(

“I

smcmmtcic:nmk,

8ec

5m5t

l:eci

Re”

590-)

(Mardi

s)

2005)

ci

5i31.\

\‘,‘mmImmhm’cm\’~ in~

iisttmme

cnf

cc~cmi~n’mrenh

1moc,\er

mnicimmts

umnser

Secmnsnmn

1121cm

sit

tine

(‘ieamm

Air

.\ctm.

lime

,\u.eumc\

lid’

tmcnt

cimc’si

mmmc

icrimer

ctl;mmiicc:I:ie

reqmmmrcn:mennt

thou

mmrovmsics

mm

ssimim

tue

cmtmmincmiune

mc:

reslmm:ud

DNi(

mc’

i.:s’..’mm

mcdccrmh’.

c’t

,mmmcl

repmnn

I lAP

cmmnissiccnms,

limers’iore.

ntcm’sumcmnuu

mo

mime

pncu\

ismmmus

ni

25-S;.

iSthmi

cci

tine

:\dcmne\’s

reemii~mmncnmms,

he

,\cemmc\

has

mIsc

rccmmiatom’v

Incmsns

kim’

nec1mmirnmnc

nine

mej’cmm’tmmmg

~‘~

\1~5

emnmnnnec!

Fc~

eoc’.i

•H

esh

pc:\\cr

plcmnns.

42.

Lcmr

mine~c ‘ccnsccmns,

Ccmmmdmncunn,~ 5j’m.l(mm:

cnncl (h~

hi

10/cc

cmnnd

Conndmniccmn

5.7.2

mis

nn

relates

iii

re1nuumnmnnrm

emtiissnmmnns

cci

I-tAlk

iun

time

Ammrmnmal

Lntmissicmmn Repon.

oil

contested

hereimn, are

sicmvesi

escnlsistenmt

w

mmii

nine AP~\

.cnusi 1)510

m’cc1cuesns

nincni

mine

Board order

nine

.‘\eemney

tc)

cnmnnend

time

Jnermnuin

Inc

slciene

stncln

cc

umnslnnnsmuns,

(v)

Itelemnliorn

and ,kvailahjliv

oF Records

43,

5 ~c:unsinmnnmmns

5.6.2(m)

aind

id

sm

imch

time

bsmndemm of copvnmng

rccscrds

lime

Agency

m’ec~mnesmsfronn

nine

Agenney.

as ~mcnmed

nun

Cncmmshinion

5.6.2(cn).

o

nine

perunnimnee.

Winile DM6

germcn’mnily

does

ui~mt oiniecn

ci

pn’ovmdimn~nine

Agenmcv

u’ecccm’ds

reasonably requested

annsi

is

n’ectssuuecl

by

nine

Aeemncy’s

smcntennnenm

imm

tine Responsiveness

Smmnnmnnary

that

its

“onn-siIe

inspect

join of records

annd

wnnt temm

smr

verina

requests for

copies of

records

~vn

H

trennerall v occur

at

reasomnable

n

inmmes

ansi

be

reason able

in

unamume

and

scope’’

(Responsiveness

Smn mnnnmary’. p.

18)

(ennnlnhasis added). DM6

nnay

riot

he

able

to print

and

provisle

data within

fine span

of

aim

irnspcct

n

mr’s

visit

wine’re

tine

records

are

electronic

mnmmd

irmelmude

vast

cmunnomnnnis of data.

Moreover,

mnicnsl

cmi

tine

electu’onmie

records

cnn’e

cmlready

mmvaricmhle

to

mine

Ageuney

thromngin

ins

osvmn

cur

USE.PA’s

dcnmcthcnses,

and

wbms:n’e

his

ms

tine

case. DM0

simomnld

riot

b.c required

to

agcmmnn

prcn’c’nde

mime

data

-21-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED, CLERKS

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB

2006-072

*

~k

*

*

*

c.i”e:nn

in.c

mciss

Lur

sc1ctnnd

mmtnt~’meeee’,tttcm’.’’mc,

ci moi

eerncinmn:\

dims

ci

tmm’i

)c’

iic,.c

mc’

Imrd:nm

‘lilt

me

inniucrmnnatiomn.

1-anther,

DM0

is

tm’smmnblcsi

my

mite

simicmlif’uer

,en’m’emm/h

tlncnm

nine

.‘\cenme\

inncimmdesl

inn

nts

~namerneunt,

in

imnninies

nlncmn

mine

,‘\eemns\

inlay

micun

cni\\

us’s clncsse

m’s’ccsccmncclite

tunes.

mndmttnre,

aunsi

scope of these

m’eqnnesns.

44,

hscr these

neccsonns,

(,otnsiitioums 5.ftthi

mmmd

Is’).

cmii

eccmnnesnenl

inen”cn

mm,

cmn’e

smacesl

eannsnstefll

wmmin

tine

APS,

cmund DM0

nesimnesms

iltcnn

mine

hcccnn’d

cmrsier

nine

Acenmcv

cc

annnennd

mheunn

iii

ci

umnmmmnmner

to

ccnrrcen

mine

del

ncteumemes

cccmnliumed

cmlumun

e.

(nil

I )nplieali

V

Reporting

45.

Various pn’o\usioas

ol

tine

permnur

innnpose

cchnitccnniccmt.s

tic

~mmlntmnnt

nmrfscrnnmcntucmmn

nc

nine

.\gemnc~mmcm

DM6

arecmclv

smmbmnnnts

eleetronueaiic

to

cove rim mmnemnt

cigenneics

ptirsiucnmnu

to

e.erncnnnn federal

cnmnsl

~tcnne

reqnmnn’eunneunts.

lmnlscn’unmnmismn

smnbmnnnmned

eieenrsmnni’ailv

msn the IJSEI’A.

ion

innsncnrnee.

is

genmcrcniic’

mmvcmilcihnle

to

mine

Acemucv

timn’orueh fmSLpA’,5

electrinunie

sicimcnFncnses.

‘lie

m’eqrmin’ennennt

ci

smnlnnnin

nuntccnmmmcntiomn

mo

nine

Ageunes’

Uncut

us

airectd\

avcmmlcmhle

mmn

nine Agemmc~

eleemrsumnnecmlly

results

imn

sltminliecnmi\’e

olnliganisnuis

nan

are

inordemnsomnme

cnnmsi

serve

uno

cnp~nam’ennm

jnmnr1nose.

Therei’cnre,

line

requuiretnmernn

is

arbitrary

aund

ccnlnriciotms.

i—or

ilnese reasons.

all

eomnditiouns that

nmnnpose obligations

m.npomn

DM6

to

snbmjuit

iumfon’nnatisnum

no

tIme

Ageuncy

tlncnt

is

cnvcni)znbie

Is)

nine

Agency ½’i(hornt

snucin

stnlmninssiomns,

are stayed

consistent

with

tine APA. and

DM6

requests

tham

such

conditions

he deleted front

line

pennnim.

(vii)

Submission of Blank,

Record

Forms to

the

Agency

46.

DM6

is

unstnre as

to

what the

Agency

expects

with

respect

to

Conditicnn

5.6.2(d).

See Conditioin 5.6.2(d).

On

fine one hand,

this

condition

nay require submission of

mhe records

rhan

are

m’equired by

Connditisnns 7.1.9-i.

7.1.92.71.9-3.7.1.9-4.7.2(1,739

749

7.5,9.

urns

7.6.9.

Onn

the

other

lnamnd,

Csnundition

5.6.2(d)

nay

requni-nI’ DM6

to

subminit blank

.2J

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING,

RECEIVED, CLERK’S OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB 2006-072

*

*

*

‘k

*

cc’

p

Is’s

‘.5

its

reL’m’mLsc,

5”:

‘mimcmm~

.

c’

man

mime

‘\cenmev

cmii,

•eimes,~limc’mtm

mci

tsmmmn,

m,mnsi

mrpe oi

ec’mnmenmm.

If

iImns

mimmet

mmmiem

i’tem,mmtccdm

is

cccrn’ecn.

mlnere

is

ito

in,ms

mum

i,m\\

icir

such

a

neslmnmrenmenmn

c.mume

mm

utnrmst

Inc

cie.eted.

47,

I’,,n~

in

c~’m’iic:u,’. inc’s

time

uncict

ccuncl

respccmu~mimmimuc nc’

dc”.

clip

aund

inmnplemnncnn

nunmerummi

recccm’nlkee1nimmm’

~nsmencu’

P’emn

minc

nnnosu

mnmnscc1ninusnmccnmed

eommmpcmmm\

Incns

nine

nighm

to

develop

mmmd

imnipL’mms:nmm

Himemnimml

ree,’rdkeemnimne

svsnummns

dimist

bedmn’s

Line n’esnomnsihiliny for

anmy

umi’i,t!uememienes

mu

mn.m,m.,s~rmc,,c’mm.:’ ~mc:\ho:mmi

ci

smcmnnmmccm-s

crmmimm

ncr

tine

prmcmnnmucamucnn

cnmrs’pcnu’ninnc

I’mcrnmnmmn.s

mimrmcntcim

r,mmen m’m,m’,imnL

i:ie

‘icennev

imcm~ mmci

cnsmmiic’umn’c’

Inc

cceeu’sce

nine

Jevelopnnnemmm

cci

rcescrslkcepmmmc

scm

me1c’~rmntcc’

Icc:mnmmmms.

lime

;\cemnsc

cc,~time

c,emtinon’ime

to

require

titan

ceulamun

tmnl’ccnucn:mtnnsnn

he

c’epc’rmc’cd

i’umm

cites

no

mncc authority.

heemmmnsc

ulmere

is

monte.

no

ssmjnpou’l

LInk

em

cnmin

sun.

4~.

mur

clccm’s

mine

:\ee’,mey

1mm’cmsude

mu

lnnnm’jnccse

icmr

minis

eommslimimcn

-

\Vinieh serves

as

cnn

exceiiennn

cxcmnnm1nie

cut

~clie

.m

ciencimieci

smcmnennueunm-oi-Incisis

doemmnmnennn

‘mould

mns:eomnnpaun~ nine

(‘,\Api’

peu’nnnmts.

mmneiumcimmmg

nine

drcmn’ns,

as

res1cnnred

my

‘I

in!e

V.

Onne

comm

merel

assumnne

that

nine

,‘\gcuney’s

pmtu’1nmc.se

icr

mimi’

commciimnmmmn

is

cm

‘es iew

recscri,k

nimcnn

pen’mnnmtees

nOun

no

keep

inn

ssmplnoui

mcf

tine

vcnriomns

reecmm’dkeelnntnc

n’e quireumnennms

inn

mine

1nenuninn

mn order

ncc

assmnre that they are

cidequcnue.

I’lmmwever ,theme

5

icc

u’eu.mtmlcnnorv or

sncnmmmnor\

basis

Ion’

mine Aceuncy to

sisn this.

annd

it

lncns

cnued

unonne.

Moreccver.

ui

mine Agenney’s

purpose

or

reqtninimm~tinis

ssnhmnnissio,n

is

to

determine

nine adequacy oi

n’ceoi’clkeepinng.

them

wutinoum

nnninen’emnm

krnsnwledge of

mnil sff tine

details

of amy givein

open’amionn.

it

will

Inc

difficult

Ion

mine

Amnemney

no

slenerniimne the. aslequacy of

recorsikeeping

i’cnr

nine

f’cneilnmy

mlun’omngh

cnn

cuisine review,

if

tine Agency finds

recorsls

that

are

siminumnitned

durinme

tine

nu’escrihesl

repscn

ummng

Inermmcis

mnmaclecimrate.

nine

Agemnc~Incus

a

m’eunmedc’

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED. CLERK’S

OFFICE,

NOVEMBER

3,

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB

2006-072

*

*

‘k

*

*

d:’,cmclccln

e

ic’

im

umminsurim

mice

icie:

ii

comm

5

.c~msy

.,rm:mmmsn

nine

c’ccem’ncmnny.

Hsmn

H

tiny

miss

minim

esnmn

n 1ncmmn

y

becnm’s,

1-cmm’ulner,

ii’

mite

esumnmpanm\

k

eccmmceu’nmed

ss’imlm

time

cmdes1tmmuec

ml

mis

1’mlmmmnnnesi

u’eecmrdkeepcng.

it

s’cnum

musk

mmmc

,‘\geunc\

tcm

1nrcnvtcie

rm

smnmmue

eommmmsei.

Pro’msiimne

such

eccmmunsei

or

cnssrsmcmmnce

5

a

snccmmumory

inmmnemisumn

cc!’

mine

Acetic’,

i:vemn

mmcm.

Imsuwever.

mime

Acetnec

suit

smmncnini

y

nts

assmsm.ctmee

imn

under

nc.

mcmneurmpn

cc

mmvcc;c

reincimnee

cm

time

pcmm’n

ccf’tlme

nemummumree

dncmnnlcl

titere

Inc

dun

eunlccreemncemnt

cneniscnm

inrocmglmu

Am

mnmuem’Jnmenciuimcmn

mci

minis

escmnditusnnm

eccmmici

he

mmcmi

n\

pmccvudiumg

lnlmimmk

reecmm’smkeeinmumc

isuniuts

mum

time

\gcmms’\,

c:bsemmn

cm

cmcnmiuunnnmnmeanionn

trcnmmm

nine Age:mc~

titan

nines

cure

nummusleslmuame.

s’mntscrecnneunt

;cccninsm

nine

pertimmunee

cmr

mtnmnslesimuate

n’eeorslkee~niungus

inarresi. so

lcummc

as

nine

t’scrmnns

mire

i’iliesi

omit.

heemimu’e

mimes’

cmm’c

covered

mu

tire

pcrmrmmm

slnieisi.

50.

Addimmouncmllv,

One

Agennc’u

lois

vucicnned

i’)MG’s

dtme

inu’oeess

riglnns

smmnsier

tine

Cscimsiitumiou

by n’eqinuu’umng

scrinmnmissnomn si

timese

sicmcmmnmmeuts

hef’cun’e DM6

mmcd

fine

opps’i’ntuniny

tsn

exem’eiuse

its’

nigint

no

appeal

mine

ecnmnslmnicnmn.

mns

cn’aunmesi h~nine

Act

am

Seemmon 40.2.

lIne

Act

allows

perumnnntees

35

slays

in whicin

no

cnininemni

eucmcditiscmns

of

tine

bneu’mmmmm

no

wlniein

ut

objects.

Tine

Agemneys

n’equirennnernt

an

(‘ucinditioun 5tu.2(si

t

mmn~nDM6

stnhmnnit

hlaunk

t’snu’mnns

wnniminn

3(1

days of

isstnaunec

unf

tine

pernnmt

sigmniiieccmnnis’

amncien’rnnnuue~DM6’s

right

to

cnppecni

—

cnrmd

tine

efi’eetivemness

of tlnan

rigbnm

—

or

forces

DM6

to

‘cuol cnne

mine

n

ernnns

ccnnd

esnindin iomns

of

nIne

pernnim

mo ilnil y preserve

its rights.

Ahmhough

tine

coindition

is

stayed.

lneeatise

tIne appeal

nnay not

he filed

urnmih

35

days

after

issnuanee.

there could

at least

be

a

question as

to whemhnem’ DM6

was

in violation

from

the

tinne the

report

was due until the

cmppeal

was filed.

DM6

submits

that the

stay relates

hack

to

tine

date of’ issuance.

Nevertheless,

it

is

iunnproper

to even create

this

tnuneertainty.

This

denies

DM6

dmie

pn’ocess and

sm

is

mnutesnmnstiuunicnunal.

urnhcnwiui.

nuns

am’hinrar\’

aund capricious.

-23-

---

ELECTRONIC

FILING.

RECEIVED, CLERK’S

OFFICE.

NOVEMBER

3.

2005

*

*

*

*

*

POB

2006-072

*

*

*

*

*

St.

I

ncr

‘imese

recc\c~i

.

,‘m’,s

udr,nmn

5.c’,ltcim,

encmnmessesi

i’.ete:r,.

us

smmnyecl

escmn.snsueunn

us

uth

tine

i0\

cmmnsi

I)Yi6

n’eclime\m’.

mmcm,n

nIne

Rommrsl

ccrnier

nine A~~mucy

mcc

sieleme

mm

irsurn

tine

perunnin.

1mm

mime

mmims’n’mmmmnise, i)\iG

ec’,mmesH

mmml

tics’

Board

imnnerprem

mimmu

eonn,limin’m

‘mnein

nan